Advisory Panel to the Foreign Minister on Climate Change: Recommendations on Energy Promote New Diplomacy on Energy through Leading Global Efforts against Climate Change
February 2018
SLIDE DECK
1 Japan: GHGs emissions and percentage of CO2 from energy-use
waste 2% others0.3% nitrous oxide 1.6% CFCs 3.7% industrial processes and product use 4% methan 2.3% residential 5% non-energy commercial related CO2 7% 6.4%
Japan Japan GHGs emissions by gas direct CO2 emissions FY2016 transport FY2016 preliminary figures preliminary figures 17% 1,322 million tons 1,222 million tons
industries (factories, etc.) 24%
energy conversion (CO2) Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 41% 92.4% energy related CO2 from energy use 86.5% 93.6% from non-energy use 5.9%
2 source: Ministry of the Environment (Japan), Preliminary figures for GHG emissions in FY2016 Global PV expansion
GW 73GW in 2016: China 34GW, Japan 7GW — more than 300GW 98GW in 2017: China 53GW, Japan 7GW — more than 400GW 450 more than source: BP Statical Review of World Energy 2017、GTM Research、RTS 400GW402.6 400
350 303.6 300
250 230.6
200 180.0
150 139.0 100.8 100 71.8
50 41.3 16.2 24.5 1.3 1.6 2.0 2.6 3.7 5.1 6.7 9.4 0 20002000 20012001 20022002 20032003 20042004 20052005 20062006 20072007 20082008 20092009 20102010 20112011 20122012 20132013 20142014 20152015 20162016 20172017
3 GW PV installation in top 10 countries in 2016 90
source:IEA Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme, Snapshot of Global PV Markets, 2016 (2017).
80 78.1!
70
60
50 42.8! 41.2! 40.3! 40
30
19.3! 20
11.6! 9! 10 7.1! 5.9! 5.5!
0 Japan日本 China中国 Germanyドイツ U.S.米国 イタリアItaly U.K.英国 インドIndia Franceフランス オーストラリ Australia スペインSpain ア 4 Global wind expansion GW 600 53GW in 2017 — almost 540GW 540GW 539.6 source: Global Wind Energy Council (2018)
500 487.5
432.9
400
340.0 318.5 300 283.0
238.1
198.0 200 159.0
120.1 94.0 100 74.0 59.1 47.6 31.1 39.4 17.4 23.9 0 20002000 20012001 20022002 20032003 20042004 20052005 20062006 20072007 20082008 20092009 20102010 20112011 20122012 2013 2014 2015 20162016 20172017 5 Wind installation in top 10 countries and Japan in 2017
GW source: Global Wind Energy Council (2018)
200 188.2
180
160
140
120
100 89
80 56 60
40 32.8 23.2 18.9 13.8 20 12.8 12.2 9.5 3.4 0 Japan日本 China中国 U.S.米国 Germanyドイツ インドIndia スペインU.K. Spain英国 フランスFrance ブラジル Canada カナダBrazil イタリアItaly
6 Global annual additional capacity of Renewables VS. Non-renewables
renewables non-renewables GW 200
150
100
50
0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 再生可能Renewables 14 21 31 35 35 41 54 69 75 79 104 118 119 127 154 164 非再生可能Non-Renewables 84 111 116 116 93 133 145 107 100 138 118 117 87 93 97 96
7 source: IRENA (2017), REthinking Energy 2017: Accelerating the global energy transformation, REN21 (2017) Global Status Report 2017, World Nuclear Association Global renewable heat use World and Japan
World Japan
EJ/year 10^18J/year PJ/year 10^15J/year 25 250250 太陽熱 solar thermal
bioenergy 20 バイオエネルギー 200200
15
150150 10 210 185 191 201 197 175 180 192 197 100 159 182 191 5 100 137 142 113 101
0 2015 5050 modern bioenergy geothermal 34 31 31 renewable electricity 27 24 24 23 21 20 19 17 16 15 13 12 11 solar thermal 00 renewable district heat 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 sources:IEA (2017), Renewable 2017, METI ”Energy Statistics” (22nd November, 2017) The levelized cost of electricity for projects and global weighted average values for CSP, solar PV, onshore and offshore wind, 2010-2022
Onshore wind Solar PV Offshore wind Concentrating solar 0.4
Auction database LCOE databasse 0.3
0.2 USD/kWh 2016 0.1
0.0
source: IRENA Renewable Cost Database and Auctions Database. note: Each circle represents and individual project or an auction result where there was a single clearing price at auction. The centre of the circle is the value for the cost of each project on the Y axis. The thick lines are the global weighted average LCOE, or auction values, by year. For the LCOE data, the real WACC is 7.5% for OECD countries and China, and 10% forsource: the :Bloombergrest of the Newworld. Energy The Finance(2017), band represents Notes: Figures the fossil refer fuel-firedto an estimated power project generation LCOE, taking cost into range.account tariff, inflation, merchant tail 9 assumption and a 23-year project lifetime. Horizontal axis refers to commissioning year Source: IRENA (2018), Renewable Power Generation Cost in 2017 Decreasing bidding prices for utility-scale solar
Sharp decline of bidding prices for utility-scale solar Recently, below 2 cents/kWh.
South Africa
India France Peru Morocco Jordan
Zambia Germany Brazil China Argentina the US Mexico Saudi Arabia Dubai Chile
10 source: IRENA (2017), REthinking Energy 2017: Accelerating the global energy transformation Solar PV projected cost reduction until 2025
from 2015 to 2025 the cost of PV is expected to be reduced by 59%
Module Inverter Racking and mounting Other BoS hardware Installation/EPC/development Other
Due to the reduction in the installation cost for PV, the LCOE for utility-scale solar PV will decrease by 59% in 10 years (2015-2025). In 2025, it will be 0.03-0.12USD/kWh.
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
11 source:IRENA (2016), The Power to Change: Solar and Wind Cost Reduction Potential to 2025 Global Investment in Power Capacity, by Type, 2012-2016
Renewable Energy, Fossil Fuel, Nuclear Power
billion USD
Fossil and nuclear fossil fuel nuclear power Modern Renewables Solar PV Wind Power Large-scale hydropower Bio-power Other ※Others include CSP, geothermal, small hydropower, ocean power 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
12 source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance 2017 Clean Energy Investment by Region 2004-2017
$bn BalanceBalance shifts shifts from Europe Europe as as largest-investinglargest-investing regionregion to to Asia Asia asas number number one regionregion APAC
EMEA
AMER
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 APAC
13 source:Bloomberg New Energy Finance, 2017 Outlooks for power capacity expansion in 2040 IEA: Global average annual net capacity additions by type 2017−2040, renewables will be significantly expanded
Nuclear Power source: IEA(2017), World Energy Outlook 2017
Gas
Coal
Renewables Solar Power Wind Others GW
Bloomberg: Renewable Energy will dominate the electric power mix in 2040 Small-scale solar 1.7% source: Bloomberg(2017), NEO Utility-scale Solar 3.2% Geo, Solar Thermal 0.3% Geo, Solar Thermal 0.3% Onshore Wind 7.1% Bioenergy 2% Small-scale solar Coal 10.8% 13.7% Coal 30.8% Gas Hydro Utility-scale Solar 17.9% 2016 24.2% 2040 14.7% 6,528GW 12,879GW
Oil 2% Nuclear Nucler 3.5% 5.3% Gas Onshore Hydro Oil 25.0% Wind 12.6% 6.4% Off-shore Wind 1.5% 15.4% 14 Bioenergy 1.5% Examples of “decoupling” in the world
2 2
1.8 Germany 1.8 UK
1.6 1.6
1.4 1.4
1.2 1.2
1 1
0.8 0.8
0.6 GDP 0.6 GDP
0.4 Primary energy supply 0.4 Primary energy supply
0.2 GHGs 0.2 GHGs
0 0
19901991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 19901991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
2 2 1.8 the US 1.8 Japan
1.6 1.6 “Decoupling” is also starting in Japan 1.4 1.4
1.2 1.2
1 1
0.8 0.8
0.6 GDP 0.6 GDP 0.4 Primary energy supply 0.4 Primary energy supply 0.2 GHGs 0.2 GHGs
0 0
15 19901991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 19901991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
15 Source: Primary Energy Supply・GDP:OECD/IEA(2017) CO2 emission from fuel combustion, GHG Relationship between clean energy investment and GDP until 2050 If energy conversion measures (REmap scenario) for decarbonization to achieve the 2 degrees target are implemented, 29 trillion USD will be required as additional investment until 2050. GDP will be boosted by 0.8%. Additional investment until 2050 Net 29 Trillion USD End-use sectors fossil化石燃料 fuels 原子力nuclear power Power generation エネルギー効率化energy efficiency renewabls 再生可能エネルギー CCS and others Upstream EarlyCCSその他 building replacement旧式建築物の建替え T&D,T&D バッテリー、バックアップ buttery & back-up
2015-2050Additional investments年に必要な追加的投資(兆ドル) in 2015-2050 (USD trillion)
GDP increase
2030 2050 GDP increase in 2050 0.8%
Full crowding out Partial crowding out No crowding out Source: IEA/IRENA (2017), 16 (central case) Perspectives for the Energy Transition Jobs in renewable energy around the world in 2016
Solar PV
Liquid Biofuels
Large-scale Hydro
Wind Source: International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), 2017
Solar Heating/ Cooling
Solid Biomass
Biogas
Small-scale Hydro
Geothermal
CSP
17 Comparison power generation cost among major countries
Comparison Power Generation Cost among Major Countries (LCOE, 2017 First Half)
Cent USD/kWh
Fossil fuel ※ Exclude Oil-Fired
Wind (Onshore)
PV
Coal (Average)
Gas Combined Cycle (Average) China India Japan Germany UK Brazil Chile US Wind (Onshore) and PV (Average) Asia Europe North America / South America
18 source: :BNEF(2017)、Levelized Cost of Electricity Comparison of PV costs in the world
low cost middle cost high cost
Source: IRENA (2016), Power to Change
left to right, PV cost is higher from
19 China Germany India UK Italy Jordan France Chile Spain USA Australia Japan Energy Efficiency Status in Japan Summary of IEA Recommendations on Energy Efficiency for Japan: General, Buildings, Transport, District Heating and Cooling, including Co-generation • Continue to develop policies that will deliver energy efficiency improvements in small and medium-sized enterprises. • Move forward with the design and implementation of ambitious energy efficiency standards for new buildings by 2020, with the aim of realising zero-energy buildings as soon as possible, and an effective enforcement regime. • Adopt a comprehensive strategy for identifying and realising the energy-saving potential in the existing building stock. Consider implementing an effective labelling scheme for buildings to be applied when a building is sold or rented. • Continue the successful policy to introduce stricter fuel efficiency standards and efforts to promote next-generation vehicle technology. • Build on the success of the Top Runner Programme, expanding the range of products covered particularly in the commercial and industrial sectors. • Investigate increased use of district heating and cooling (including co-generation) for more integration of renewable energy sources, increased resilience of the electricity supply system, and for wider use of municipal waste while also building international collaboration with countries featuring high penetration of DHC. • Ensure that operators of co-generation plants receive a remuneration on excess electricity sales that is in line with the avoided costs resulting from the injection of this electricity into the grid.
Energy intensity in Japan and in other selected IEA member countries, 1973-2015 The US IEA average UK Germany Japan toe/USD 1000 GDP PPP
1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015
20 Source: IEA(2016), Energy Policies of IEA Countries, Japan 2016 Review Smoothing effect of renewable energy widespread deployment
Electricity generation from variable renewables (VRE) such as wind and solar fluctuates more on a small geographical scale than on a wider geographical scale this is the “smoothing effect.”
IEA: “[…] If power plants are well dispersed, such fluctuations will be gentler and slower.” – Getting wind and solar onto the grid, 2017
The dispersal of VRE power plants makes their output easier to accommodate
Wind PV
wind in 5x5 km area average of wind supply area PV 5x5 km area average for PV supply area
CSIR(2016), Aggregation Investigation for Wind and PV in South Africa
21 Source: IEA, Getting Wind and Sun onto the Grid, 2017 30,000 MW Changing electric power market: From baseload to flexible power supply 25,000
nuclear power When looking at the whole area in a day, 20,000 imports the variability in electricity generation from renewables is not "saw-toothed" 15,000 Thermal MW type. Solar California, To match electricity demand, close to 10,000 Wind June 10, 2017 zero marginal cost renewables are Geothermal dispatched first and, then, the output 5,000 bioenergy from other sources is adjusted to cover Source: California Independent System Operator hydro power the net (residual) demand. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 GW Hour nuclear and coal participate in flexible operations Germany, January 2018 (one month)
Solar Wind Seasonal Storage Pumped Storage Others Gas Oil Hard Coal Brown Coal Uranium Biomass Source: Fraunhofer ISE Hydro Power 22 Renewables and coal power policy of major countries Share of coal Policy Major developments
・Setting a standard for subsidies for new fossil generation 41%→28%→12% At least 27% for renewables by 2030 EU ・EU-ETS application [target in 2030 is 9.1%] (approx. 50% in total electricity generation) ・CCS directives in 2009 ・Published a draft legislation for CO2 emission standard 65%→37%→- UK Coal phaseout by 2025 ・EU-ETS subject country, unilaterally set a lower limit [target in 2030 is 0%] ・2 projects for CCS, CCS ready regulation already in place ・Promulgated a directive not to approve construction without CCS 8%→4%→- France Coal phaseout by 2021 ・EU-ETS subject country [target in 2030 is 0%] ・CCS-ready regulation already in place ・Ban construction of new lignite coal-fired power plants for 5 years Policy to pay compensation for shutting ・EU-ETS subject country Germany 59%→47%→- down lignite coal power plants under ・ consideration Levy electricity as a part of environment tax ・CCS-ready regulation already in place
・CO2 emission standard already in place (it will be reviewed according to Review policy of previous administration including the President’s decree) CPP and related regulations based on the ・North-east introduced emission trading scheme 53%→40%→26% US President’s decree (suspend, amend and [target in 2030 is 7%] abrogate, if necessary) *some research bodies ・CCS project underway with 3 projects in planning foresee no increase in coal power due to less (Note) Subsidies for coal and nuclear power that Trump’s administration tried pricey shale-gas compared with coal. to introduce was denied by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission unanimously and the draft was unsuccessful.
・CO2 emission standard is in place Canada 17%→10%→- Coal phaseout (without CCS) by 2030 ・Quebec state already introduced emissions trading scheme ・One CCS project is underway
Deterring new construction of coal-fired ・Setting an emission coefficient target by major power utilities China 72%→75%→51% power plants and partly cancelled ・Start of emissions trading scheme on national scale in 2017 construction plans ・2 CCS projects in planning
No new coal plants by 2027 except those ・Introduction of clean energy tax on coal and others (tax increase in Feb India 65%→73%→58% already under construction 2016 and renamed as clean environment tax)
・Targets of Energy Save Act/Upgrading Act were set. Strengthening of 13%→33%→27% Japan operations. [target in 2030 is 26%] ・Introduction of global warming countermeasure tax, increase to the final tax rate was completed in April 2016. 23 source: Institution Presentation Materials Decarbonisation trend of international financial institutions and others Suspension of investment in coal and divestment trend
June 2013 US President’s climate action plan : appeal for suspension of public finance support for new coal- fired power plants construction abroad.
July 2013 World Bank Group Announced a guideline for energy sector financing with a principle of no financial support for coal-fired power plants construction.
July 2013 EIB Announced an emissions standard to be used when providing finance to a fossil-fired power plant.
Denmark, Finland, Suspended new financing to coal fire construction in principle and appealed to do the same to September 2013 Iceland, Norway and Sweden other countries and multilateral financial institutions.
October 2013 US Treasury announced a guideline on public financing support by international development financing institutions on coal-fired power plants projects in developing countries.
November 2013 UK Announced its agreement to the US policy.
December 2013 US Ex-im bank and EBRD Announced suspension of financing coal-fired power plants without exceptions.
March 2014 Netherlands Announced its agreement to the US policy.
September 2014 Germany Announced limiting its support for new coal-fired power plants within KfW group.
November 2014 France Announced its agreement to the US policy.
November 2015 OECD countries Agreement on limiting public support for coal fire to USC and others at the export credit arrangement group meeting.
Announced suspension of financing in upstream oil and gas after 2019. Committed to disclose December 2017 World Bank Group GHG emission amount of World Bank supported energy related projects after 2018.
December 2017 MDBs Announced a joint statement on providing support along the Paris agreement target to realise zero-emission in the latter half of this century. 24 source: Institution Presentation Materials Global trend toward decarbonisation
member countries 1. Canada Inauguration of “Powering Past Coal Alliance” aiming at 2. United Kingdom 3. Austria phasing out coal power 4. Angola 5. Belgium 6. Costa Rica • The UK and Canada jointly established the Alliance on 16 7. Denmark 8. El Salvador November 2017, during the COP 23 period, with the goal of 9. Ethiopia* rallying support for phasing out coal power in collaboration with 10. Fiji 11. Finland governments, municipalities and companies. 12. France • In the declaration, a quote was made from a research that “in 13. Italy 14. Latvia* order to implement the Paris agreement, the OECD and EU by 15. Liechtenstein* 16. Luxembourg 2030 and others by 2050, need to get rid of coal power.” The 17. Marshall Islands group aims at increasing the number of participating countries 18. Mexico 19. Netherlands to 50 by COP 24. 20. New Zealand 21. Niue ※at the time of inauguration, 27 countries and municipalities participated in. By the 22. Portugal Paris One-planet summit on 12 Dec, this number increased to 58 countries and 23. Sweden* municipalities including France and Italy. 24. Switzerland 25. Tuvalu* 26. Vanuatu*
*Partners who joined the Alliance at the One Planet Summit
25 Changing energy landscape in Asia IEA’s publication “Southeast Asia Energy Outlook” notes, “Challenges remain to expand coal-fired capacity , not least public opposition in some countries. Additional challenges involve financing the high upfront coats when many international development banks are limiting lending to coal projects and ensuring availability of skilled operators to achieve efficient output in plant operation.” “Solar and wind power generation grows especially quickly, at an annual average rate of around 15% between 2016 and 2040. Geothermal power generation almost triples by 2040, reflecting its substantial potential in some parts of Southeast Asia and supportive government policies”
“Reflecting recent TWh policy developments that favour renewables and the multiple challenges in building coal-fired plants, the contribution of coal in the power generation mix in 2040 is lower by almost ten percentage points at 40% than in our Southeast Asia Energy Outlook - 2015 (IEA 2015).”
26 Source:IEA (2017), Southeast Asia Energy Outlook 2017 Amount of CO2 emissions from different types of fossil-fired power plants Even the most advanced coal plant emits more than double the CO2 amount of a LNG plant 1 0.9 0.867 0.9 0.80~0.84 0.8 0.8 0.73 0.721 0.70.7 0.59 0.60.6 (kg-CO2/kWh)
0.5 0.5 0.415 0.40.4 0.32~0.36
0.30.3
0.20.2 CO2 emissions per unit 0.10.1
0 Coal-Fired Coal-Fired Coal-Fired Coal-Fired Oil-Fired LNG-Fired Recent LNG-Fired (Conventional) (USC) (IGCC) (IGFC) (Conventional) (Conventional) (GTCC)
27 source: Ministry of the Environment 「Working Group for Carbon Pricing」2nd of June, 2017 Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) by power source MeanLCOE平均LCOE $/MWh $/MWh $360 $359 % Indicates the rate of increase / decrease of LCOE. Nuclear power is rising, while costs of other power sources are declining.
$330 Ex. Nuclear power plant currently under construction UK: Hinckley Point C: JPY 2.94 trillion (GBP 19.6 billion, 1.63 million kW × 2) JPY 900 thousands / kW US: Vogtle: JPY 2.3 trillion (USD 21 billion, 112 million kW × 2) JPY 1.02 million / kW $300
$270 $248 原Nuclear子力 20% +20% $240 石Coal炭 -8% -8%
$210 ガGas-combinedスコンバインドサ イcycleクル - -27%27% Utility-scale PV (Mega-solar) -86% $180 メガソーラー -86% $157 風Wind力 -67% -67% $150 $148 $135 $125 $124 $117 $117 $123 $112 $120 $111 $111 $102 $105 $111 $109 $95 $96 $104 $108 $102 $96 $98 $102 $90 $83 $79 $83 $75 $74 $82 $65 $71 $72 $74 $63 $60 $70 $64 $60 $59 $55 $55 $50 $47 $45 $30 Source: LAZARD (2017), Levelized Cost of Energy 2017 $0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Mea nLC 28 Current status of nuclear power
The amount of electricity generated from nuclear power in the world (1990-2016) Unit: TWh (net) and share in generation (gross)
The share in electricity generation peaked in 1996, the amount of electricity generated peaked in 2006
1996 TWh The share in electricity generation share in % 2006 peaked 17.5% The amount of electricity generated peaked 2,660TWh 2016 3,000 Share in electricity generation Generation:2,476TWh 15 Amount of electricity generated Share:10.5% 2,500
2,000 10
1,500
1,000 5
500
0 0
29 Source: WNISR (2017), World Nuclear Industry Status Report Business leads decarbonization Global corporate PPA volumes, by region Top corporate off takers, 2017 536 GoogleGoogle 31 536 6 20 200 AppleApple 356 200 18 5 NorskNorsk Hydro Hydro 483 AMER EMEA APAC 1.3 16