DOCSLIB.ORG

Front Matter Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Front Matter Template Copyright by Dart Brooks Risley II 2010 The Thesis Committee for Dart Brooks Risley II Certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: British Interests and the Partition of Mosul APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Supervisor: William Roger Louis Yoav Di-Capua British Interests and the Partition of Mosul by Dart Brooks Risley II, BA Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts The University of Texas at Austin May 2010 Dedication To my Parents. Abstract British Interests and the Partition of Mosul Dart Brooks Risley II, MA The University of Texas at Austin, 2010 Supervisor: William Roger Louis This thesis seeks to examine and analyze British interests in the Iraqi province of Mosul during World War I. The province was significant from many different points of view, diplomatic, strategic, and economic. Most scholars have tended to focus on one of these aspects and neglect the larger picture; this study will attempt to fill in the gap by discussing all of these aspects in their proper context. v Table of Contents List of Illustrations ............................................................................................... vii Introduction: Mosul and History ............................................................................1 Chapter 1 Mosul before World War I ....................................................................7 Growing Interests and Rivalries .....................................................................9 The Baghdad Railway ..................................................................................13 War Begins: The Basra Campaign and the Route to Mosul ........................18 Continuity in British Policy .........................................................................23 Chapter 2 Mosul between Britain and France .......................................................25 Defining British Interests .............................................................................26 Sykes-Picot Agreement .................................................................................39 Promises to Sharif Husayn ...........................................................................44 The Capture of Mosul ..................................................................................47 The Eye of the Storm ...................................................................................50 Chapter 3 Mosul and British Interests ..................................................................53 The Lloyd George-Clemenceau Agreement ................................................54 The Spoils of War .........................................................................................65 Mosul in Context ..........................................................................................74 Conclusion: Mosul in Perspective .......................................................................76 Bibliography .........................................................................................................79 Vita ......................................................................................................................85 vi List of Illustrations Illustration 1: The Modern Borders of Iraq .........................................................8 Illustration 2: de Bunsen Committee Maps ......................................................38 Illustration 3: Sykes-Picot Partition ..................................................................39 vii Introduction: Mosul and History In the discipline of history one frequently encounters the danger of excessive specialization. The pursuit of obscure or narrow topics often leads the historian to conclusions that leave little impression on the collective knowledge of society, or to conclusions that inflate the significance a given topic. Yet at the same time, the historian is compelled to explore uncharted territory for the expansion of knowledge and one’s own career. Hence, scholars find themselves in a difficult predicament. The subject of this study attempts to find a balance between these two forces. The Iraqi province of Mosul, a province with rich and diverse culture, opens the historical profession to a wide range of topics, debates, and trends. The timeframe, 1914-1918, and perspective, British interests, of this study automatically strikes a sensitive nerve in the profession. The study of Empire and its inhabitants is divided and politically charged; many argue that studying from the view of the colonizer projects a negative and inaccurate view onto the culture of the colonized while others hold that without the view of the colonizer the historical record is incomplete and inaccurate. Both of these views make valid points, but suffer from a grave misunderstanding of each other. In the case of Mosul, much of its future during the First World War depended to a large degree on the decisions of British officials. This focus merely tells one part of the history of Mosul and by no means does it claim to describe its culture. The actions and words of the British statesmen represent a different time than our own and historians, unlike other scholars, cannot truly visit the area of their study. One can travel to Iraq, but one cannot travel to the past. Since the time of the British, the culture and ethnic composition of Iraq has changed radically. Iraq’s Jewish population is 1 now almost non-existent, the swamps of the Basra province are drained and numerous populations in Iraq were forcibly moved from their home origin and in Mosul many were brutally murdered.1 Needless to say these events have changed Iraqi society and if one seeks to study the past then one needs to understand society as it stood in its own time. The British archives provide the most abundant and readily available collections of sources for this very task. Thus, from a historical as well as methodological point of view Britain is inseparable from our understanding of the region. Mosul reveals something about the British Government and how it operates. In the process of analyzing Mosul, British officials had to consider many kinds of interests whether they were diplomatic, strategic, or commercial. All of these overlap at many points, but nevertheless contain unique elements that work together with one another to drive foreign policy. Some scholars have noted that it was commonplace that where trading ventures have gone forth to new lands in search of wealth the extension of the political authority of the mother country eventually follows in direct proportion to the economic value of the territory. Political authority brings the potential of force to guard its new possessions and allow commerce to commence without harassment.2 It was also commonplace that once political authority has been established, it forgets the commercial origins which it sprang and maintenance becomes its chief objective. Often the new administration of these new territories claim that only through the maintenance of its own power can economic development occur to the benefit of the mother country. And if a new territory becomes economically vital to the home country, 1 Kurdish deaths in the aftermath of an Iraqi military campaign in 1987-1989 are estimated at 50,000 – 70,000 2 Philip Ireland, Iraq: A Study in Political Development (London, 1938), p. 34 2 then steps are taken to protect that area very often including the acquisition of new territory.3 The distinction between a commercial interests, strategic, and diplomatic interests are not always clear. The control of a regions trade, for instance, allows a country to collect revenue from taxes, tariffs, and shares which it may then use to finance the construction of weapons, train armies, and wage war upon her rivals. Aside from the military aspect of power, the revenues obtained from trade compel nations to negotiate with one another and can even provide welfare services to its citizens. Hence, commercial interests and all its spoils are an essential component to a political entity’s ability to project all dimensions of its power and influence. There is much truth to the idea of commercial expansion leading to political expansion, especially in the case of India and the Iraqi province of Basra. But Mosul on the other hand is a unique case as its significance to the British was equally economic as well as strategic. In fact, as this research will show, Mosul’s future among the great powers during World War I was highly depended on how British and French officials viewed Mosul. Was it a vital economic interest or was it an inseparable strategic interest? Even within these debates, officials argued over which aspects of Mosul were more strategically valuable (e.g. oil versus terrain). Ultimately, the kind of interests in the region determined how the Britain conducted herself in it. These debates also reflected a more time-specific set of interests, mainly those of the First World War. Here again, Mosul offers us an important insight into British policy during the war. Britain throughout this period, but especially during the beginning, prioritized war-time concerns in Europe over imperial ambitions elsewhere in the world. 3 Ibid, pp. 35-36 3 This was particularly evident during partition negotiations with the French in 1915 and 1916, resulting in the Sykes-Picot Agreement. The debate over Mosul gives us a direct case study of this larger pattern of policy
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Forgotten Fronts the First World War Battlefield Guide: World War Battlefield First the the Forgotten Fronts Forgotten The
    Ed 1 Nov 2016 1 Nov Ed The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The Forgotten Fronts The First Battlefield War World Guide: The Forgotten Fronts Creative Media Design ADR005472 Edition 1 November 2016 THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | i The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The British Army Campaign Guide to the Forgotten Fronts of the First World War 1st Edition November 2016 Acknowledgement The publisher wishes to acknowledge the assistance of the following organisations in providing text, images, multimedia links and sketch maps for this volume: Defence Geographic Centre, Imperial War Museum, Army Historical Branch, Air Historical Branch, Army Records Society,National Portrait Gallery, Tank Museum, National Army Museum, Royal Green Jackets Museum,Shepard Trust, Royal Australian Navy, Australian Defence, Royal Artillery Historical Trust, National Archive, Canadian War Museum, National Archives of Canada, The Times, RAF Museum, Wikimedia Commons, USAF, US Library of Congress. The Cover Images Front Cover: (1) Wounded soldier of the 10th Battalion, Black Watch being carried out of a communication trench on the ‘Birdcage’ Line near Salonika, February 1916 © IWM; (2) The advance through Palestine and the Battle of Megiddo: A sergeant directs orders whilst standing on one of the wooden saddles of the Camel Transport Corps © IWM (3) Soldiers of the Royal Army Service Corps outside a Field Ambulance Station. © IWM Inside Front Cover: Helles Memorial, Gallipoli © Barbara Taylor Back Cover: ‘Blood Swept Lands and Seas of Red’ at the Tower of London © Julia Gavin ii | THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | iii ISBN: 978-1-874346-46-3 First published in November 2016 by Creative Media Designs, Army Headquarters, Andover.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7. Remembering Them
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2017-02 Understanding Atrocities: Remembering, Representing and Teaching Genocide Murray, Scott W. University of Calgary Press http://hdl.handle.net/1880/51806 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNDERSTANDING ATROCITIES: REMEMBERING, REPRESENTING, AND TEACHING GENOCIDE Edited by Scott W. Murray ISBN 978-1-55238-886-0 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specific work without breaching the artist’s copyright. COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This open-access work is published under a Creative Commons licence. This means that you are free to copy, distribute, display or perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to its authors and publisher, that you do not use this work for any commercial gain in any form, and that you in no way alter, transform, or build on the work outside of its use in normal academic scholarship without our express permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Sand: Canadians in Persia & Transcaucasia, 1918 Tom
    RED SAND: CANADIANS IN PERSIA & TRANSCAUCASIA, 1918 TOM SUTTON, MA THESIS ROUGH DRAFT, 20 JANUARY 2012 CONTENTS Introduction Chapter 1 Stopgap 2 Volunteers 3 The Mad Dash 4 Orphans 5 Relief 6 The Push 7 Bijar 8 Baku 9 Evacuation 10 Historiography Conclusion Introduction NOTES IN BOLD ARE EITHER TOPICS LEFT UNFINISHED OR GENERAL TOPIC/THESIS SENTENCES. REFERECNCE MAP IS ON LAST PAGE. Goals, Scope, Thesis Brief assessment of literature on Canada in the Russian Civil War. Brief assessment of literature on Canadians in Dunsterforce. 1 Stopgap: British Imperial Intentions and Policy in the Caucasus & Persia Before 1917, the Eastern Front was held almost entirely by the Russian Imperial Army. From the Baltic to the Black Sea, through the western Caucasus and south to the Persian Gulf, the Russians bolstered themselves against the Central Empires. The Russians and Turks traded Kurdistan, Assyria, and western Persia back and forth until the spring of 1917, when the British captured Baghdad, buttressing the south-eastern front. Meanwhile, the Russian army withered in unrest and desertion. Russian troops migrated north through Tabriz, Batum, Tiflis, and Baku, leaving dwindling numbers to defend an increasingly tenable front, and as the year wore on the fighting spirit of the Russian army evaporated. In the autumn of 1917, the three primary nationalities of the Caucasus – Georgians, Armenians, and Azerbaijanis – called an emergency meeting in Tiflis in reaction to the Bolshevik coup d'etat in Moscow and Saint Petersburg. In attendance were representatives from trade unions, civil employees, regional soviets, political parties, the army, and lastly Entente military agents.
    [Show full text]
  • The Armenians
    THE ARMENIANS By C.F. DIXON-JOHNSON “Whosoever does wrong to a Christian or a Jew shall find me his accuser on the day of judgment.” (EL KORAN) Printed and Published by GEO TOULMIN & SONS, LTD. Northgate, Blackburn. 1916 Preface The following pages were first read as a paper before the “Société d’Etudes Ethnographiques.” They have since been amplified and are now being published at the request of a number of friends, who believe that the public should have an opportunity of judging whether or not “the Armenian Question” has another side than that which has been recently so assiduously promulgated throughout the Western World. Though the championship of Greek, Bulgarian and other similar “Christian, civilized methods of fighting,” as contrasted with “Moslem atrocities” in the Balkans and Asia Minor, has been so strenuously undertaken by Lord Bryce and others, the more recent developments in the Near East may perhaps already have opened the eyes of a great many thinking people to the realization that, in sacrificing the traditional friendship of the Turk to all this more or less sectarian clamor, British diplomacy has really done nothing better than to exchange the solid and advantageous reality for a most elusive and unreliable, if not positively dangerous, set of shadows. It seems illogical that the same party which recalled the officials (and among them our present War Minister) appointed by Lord Beaconsfield to assist the Turkish Government in reforming their administration and collecting the revenue in Asia Minor, and which on the advent of the Young Turks refused to lend British Administrators to whom ample and plenary powers were assured, should now, in its eagerness to vilify the Turk, lose sight of their own mistakes which have led in the main to the conditions of which it complains, and should so utterly condemn its own former policy.
    [Show full text]
  • From Sykes-Picot to Present; the Centenary Aim of the Zionism on Syria and Iraq
    From Sykes-Picot to Present; The Centenary Aim of The Zionism on Syria and Iraq Ergenekon SAVRUN1 Özet Ower the past hundred years, much of the Middle East was arranged by Sir Mark Sykes and François Georges Picot. During the World War I Allied Powers dominanced Syria by the treaty of Sykes-Picot which was made between England and France. After the Great War Allied Powers (England-France) occupied Syria, Palestine, Iraq or all Al Jazeera and made them mandate. As the Arab World and Syria in particular is in turmoil, it has become fashionable of late to hold the 1916 Sykes-Picot Agreement responsible for the current storm surge. On the other hand, Theodor Herzl, the father of political Zionism, published a star-eyed novel entitled Altneuland (Old-New Land) in 1902. Soon after The Britain has became the biggest supporter of the Jews, but The Britain had to occupy the Ottoman Empire’s lands first with some allies, and so did it. The Allied Powers defeated Germany and Ottoman Empire. Nevertheless, the gamble paid off in the short term for Britain and Jews. In May 14, 1948 Israel was established. Since that day Israel has expanded its borders. Today, new opportunity is Syria just standing infront of Israel. We think that Israel will fill the headless body gap with Syrian and Iraqis Kurds with the support of Western World. In this article, we will emerge and try to explain this idea. Anahtar Kelimeler: Sykes-Picot Agrement, Syria-Iraq Issue, Zionism, Isreal and Kurds’ Relation. Sykes-Picot’dan Günümüze; Suriye ve Irak Üzerinde Siyonizm’in Yüz Yıllık Hedefleri Abstract Geçtiğimiz son yüzyılda, Orta Doğu’nun birçok bölümü Sir Mark Sykes ve François Georges Picot tarafından tanzim edildi.
    [Show full text]
  • Legacies of the Anglo-Hashemite Relationship in Jordan
    Legacies of the Anglo-Hashemite Relationship in Jordan: How this symbiotic alliance established the legitimacy and political longevity of the regime in the process of state-formation, 1914-1946 An Honors Thesis for the Department of Middle Eastern Studies Julie Murray Tufts University, 2018 Acknowledgements The writing of this thesis was not a unilateral effort, and I would be remiss not to acknowledge those who have helped me along the way. First of all, I would like to thank my advisor, Professor Thomas Abowd, for his encouragement of my academic curiosity this past year, and for all his help in first, making this project a reality, and second, shaping it into (what I hope is) a coherent and meaningful project. His class provided me with a new lens through which to examine political history, and gave me with the impetus to start this paper. I must also acknowledge the role my abroad experience played in shaping this thesis. It was a research project conducted with CET that sparked my interest in political stability in Jordan, so thank you to Ines and Dr. Saif, and of course, my classmates, Lensa, Matthew, and Jackie, for first empowering me to explore this topic. I would also like to thank my parents and my brother, Jonathan, for their continuous support. I feel so lucky to have such a caring family that has given me the opportunity to pursue my passions. Finally, a shout-out to the gals that have been my emotional bedrock and inspiration through this process: Annie, Maya, Miranda, Rachel – I love y’all; thanks for listening to me rant about this all year.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the MS-236: Bernard Peace WWI Photograph Album
    ________________________________________________________________________ Guide to the MS-236: Bernard Peace WWI Photograph Album Kelly Murphy ‘21, Ester Kenyon Fortenbaugh ’46 Intern February 2019 MS – 236: Bernard Peace WWI Photograph Album 1 box, .175 cubic feet Inclusive Dates: 1917-1919 Processed by: Kelly Murphy, Ester Kenyon Fortenbaugh ’46 Intern (February 2019) Provenance This photo album was purchased from Between the Covers in 2016. Biographical Note Bernard Peace was born in 1884 and lived in Lockwood, a suburb of Huddersfield, England when he enlisted in the British Army. In September 1916, Private Peace completed basic training and was placed in the Duke of Wellington’s West Riding Regiment, which mainly saw action on the Western Front. In February 1917 he was transferred to the Territorial Forces and stationed in Baghdad after its capture in March 1917. Between his arrival and his transfer home in April 1919 he stayed in Baghdad and traveled to other areas of Iraq and India when permitted. After arriving in Great Britain in November, he was transferred to the Class Z Reserve in Huddersfield.1 Although not much is known about the rest of his life, it can be presumed he left the army after the Class Z Reserve was disbanded. Historical Note The Middle Eastern theater of World War I was mainly fought between Great Britain and the Ottoman Empire. Since the Ottoman Empire was considered the weakest of the Central Powers, the British and French believed that they would be the easiest to defeat, and launched a failed naval attack on Gallipoli in 1914. They then decided on a land campaign led by the British and their colonial troops from India.
    [Show full text]
  • Allenby's Military Medicine
    ALLENBY’S MILITARY MEDICINE Life and Death in World War I Palestine eran dolev.indd 1 4/19/2007 10:35:13 eran dolev.indd 2 1/24/2007 12:55:44 ALLENBY’S MILITARY MEDICINE Life and Death in World War I Palestine ERAN DOLEV eran dolev.indd 3 4/19/2007 10:35:37 Published in 2007 by I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd 6 Salem Road, London W2 4BU 175 Fifth Avenue, New York NY 10010 www.ibtauris.com In the United States of America and Canada distributed by Palgrave Macmillan a division of St. Martin’s Press, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York NY 10010 Copyright © 2007 Eran Dolev The right of Eran Dolev to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by the author in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988. All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or any part thereof, may not be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. International Library of Colonial History 6 ISBN: 978 1 84511 290 5 A full CIP record for this book is available from the British Library A full CIP record is available from the Library of Congress Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: available Printed and bound by Thomson Press India Limited From camera-ready copy edited and supplied by the author Contents Foreword by Major General Louis Lillywhite vii Preface xi Acknowledgements xiii Prologue 1 Chapter 1: Military Medicine during the Great War 5 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Occupation and Resistance in Southern Iraq: a Study of Great Britain's Civil Administration in the Middle Euphrates and the Gr
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 3-2018 Occupation and resistance in southern Iraq: a study of Great Britain’s civil administration in the Middle Euphrates and the Great Rebellion, 1917-1920 Scott Jones DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Jones, Scott, "Occupation and resistance in southern Iraq: a study of Great Britain’s civil administration in the Middle Euphrates and the Great Rebellion, 1917-1920" (2018). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 241. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/241 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Occupation and Resistance in Southern Iraq: A Study of Great Britain’s Civil Administration in the Middle Euphrates and the Great Rebellion, 1917-1920 A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts March, 2018 BY Scott Jones Department of International Studies College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences DePaul University Chicago, Illinois Jones 1 Occupation and Resistance in Southern Iraq: A Study of Great Britain’s Civil Administration in the Middle Euphrates and the Great Rebellion, 1917-1920 Scott Jones International Studies Master’s Thesis Thesis Committee Advisor – Kaveh Ehsani, Ph.D., DePaul University Reader – Rajit Mazumder, Ph.D., DePaul University Reader – Eugene Beiriger, Ph.D., DePaul University Introduction – Occupation and Resistance in Southern Iraq 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Lines in the Sand
    Connolly’s Comment Column Lines in the Sand By Stephen F. Connolly May the 16th, 1916; what does that date bring to your mind? A movement forward, or backwards, by a metre or two, somewhere along the Western Front perhaps? Or might it be when a significant debate was held in the British Parliament? Or the French Assemblee Nationale? If you ask someone, anyone, from an Arab country, they would not need much thinking time before they told you it was the date upon which the Sykes- Picot Agreement was signed. I can hear in the background a chorus shout in unison ‘ the Sykes-what’ Agreement? The Sykes-Picot Agreement is one of the most significant agreements you have never heard of and it explains a great deal about the condition of the Middle East today, a hundred years after its signing. 2. Sir Mark Sykes was a Conservative politician and a diplomatic advisor to the Foreign Office, particularly on Middle Eastern matters. He actually knew a great deal less about the Middle East than he made out to civil servants in the Foreign Office and their political masters. Sykes seemed plausible to them, because they knew even less about the Middle East than he did, so he got by with some exotic sounding place names, real or imagined, and some Arabic sounding words, real or imagined. On the other hand, Monsieur Francois Marie Denis Georges-Picot certainly did know something about Middle Eastern matters. Prior to World War I, Picot was the French Consul in Beirut. In August 1915, he became an attache in the French Embassy in London.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgotten Regional Landscape of the Sykes-Picot Agreement
    LOEVY MACRO (DO NOT DELETE) 4/2/2018 10:42 AM RAILWAYS, PORTS, AND IRRIGATION: THE FORGOTTEN REGIONAL LANDSCAPE OF THE SYKES-PICOT AGREEMENT Karin Loevy ABSTRACT What was the geo-political scale of the Sykes-Picot Agreement of May 1916? What did the British and French mid-level officials who drew lines on its maps imagine as the territorial scope of their negotiations? This Article claims that the Sykes-Picot Agreement cannot be understood strictly as the beginning of a story about territorial division in the Middle East, but also as an end to a story of perceived regional potency. Rather than a blueprint for what would later become the post-war division of the region into artificially created independent states, the Sykes-Picot Agreement was still based on a powerful vision of a broad region that is open for a range of developmental possibilities. Part II of this Article outlines the prewar regional landscape of the agreement in ideas and practices of colonial development in Ottoman territories. Part III outlines the agreement’s war-time regional landscape in inter-imperial negotiations and in the more intimate drafting context, and locates the Sykes-Picot Agreement within a “missed” moment of regional development. I. INTRODUCTION: OPENING TERRITORIAL SPACE ............................ 288 A. Preface: December 1915, at 10 Downing Street .................... 288 B. A Forgotten Regional Landscape ........................................... 290 C. The Sykes-Picot Agreement: A Region Opening-Up for Development ........................................................................... 291 II. PRE-WAR HISTORY OF THE SYKES-PICOT AGREEMENT ................. 296 A. The Context of the Agreement in Pre-war Colonial JSD Program Manager, IILJ Visiting Scholar New York University School of Law; 22 Washington Square North, New York, NY 10001, [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1 The principal works were Benny Morris, The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987); Ilan Pappé, Britain and the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 1948–1951 (Basingstoke: Macmillan in associa- tion with St. Antony’s College Oxford, 1988); Avi Shlaim, Collusion Across the Jordan: King Abdullah, the Zionist Movement and the Partition of Palestine (Oxford: Clarendon, 1988). 2 On the origins of this myth, see pp. 85–87. 3 In particular, see Barbara Tuchman, The Bible and the Sword: England and Palestine from the Bronze Age to Balfour (New York: New York University Press, 1956), pp. xiv, 311–312, 337; Franz Kobler, The Vision was There: A History of the British Movement for the Restoration of the Jews (London: Lincolns-Prager, 1956), pp. 117–124; David Fromkin, A Peace to End all Peace: The Fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Creation of the Modern Middle East (New York: Avon Books, 1989), pp. 267–268, 283, 298; Ronald Sanders, The High Walls of Jerusalem: A History of the Balfour Declaration and the Birth of the British Mandate for Palestine (New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, 1983), pp. 73–74, 615. 4 Leonard Stein, The Balfour Declaration (London: Vallentine Mitchell, 1961). 5 Ibid., pp. 549–550. In his explanation of the Balfour Declaration David Lloyd George himself had emphasised the importance of the need for pro- Allied propaganda among Jewry. David Lloyd George, Memoirs of the Peace Conference, Vol. II (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1939), pp. 723–724. 6 Mayir Vereté, ‘The Balfour Declaration and its Makers’, Middle Eastern Studies, 6, 1 (Jan.
    [Show full text]