DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecological Response to Permafrost Thaw and Consequences for Local and Global Ecosystem Services

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecological Response to Permafrost Thaw and Consequences for Local and Global Ecosystem Services ES49CH13_Schuur ARI 26 September 2018 13:58 Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics Ecological Response to Permafrost Thaw and Consequences for Local and Global Ecosystem Services Edward A.G. Schuur and Michelle C. Mack Center for Ecosystem Science and Society, and Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011, USA; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2018. 49:279–301 Keywords The Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and carbon, nutrient, climate, vegetation change, disturbance, Arctic Systematics is online at ecolsys.annualreviews.org ecosystem, boreal ecosystem https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-121415- 032349 Abstract Copyright c 2018 by Annual Reviews. The Arctic may seem remote, but the unprecedented environmental changes All rights reserved occurring there have important consequences for global society. Of all Arc- tic system components, changes in permafrost (perennially frozen ground) are one of the least documented. Permafrost is degrading as a result of cli- Access provided by University of Alaska - Fairbanks on 02/04/19. For personal use only. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2018.49:279-301. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org mate warming, and evidence is mounting that changing permafrost will have significant impacts within and outside the region. This review asks: What are key structural and functional properties of ecosystems that interact with changing permafrost, and how do these ecosystem changes affect local and global society? Here, we look beyond the classic definition of permafrost to include a broadened focus on the composition of frozen ground, including the ice and the soil organic carbon content, and how it is changing. This ecological perspective of permafrost serves to identify areas of both vul- nerability and resilience as climate, ecological disturbance regimes, and the human footprint all continue to change in this sensitive and critical region of Earth. 279 ES49CH13_Schuur ARI 26 September 2018 13:58 1. INTRODUCTION The Arctic may seem distant and remote, but the unprecedented environmental changes occurring there have important consequences for global society. Temperature rise is amplified in northern high-latitude regions, occurring 2.5 times faster than the whole Earth (IPCC 2013), with important impacts on the frozen places of the planet (the cryosphere). Changing sea ice affects global climate, ecosystems and fisheries, and ocean transportation; shrinking ice sheets and glaciers influence water supplies and sea level; degrading permafrost (perennially frozen ground) impacts infrastructure, ecosystem services, and global climate (AMAP 2017). Well-developed satellite observing systems that record sea ice extent daily (NSIDC 2018) and the Greenland ice sheet mass monthly (Wiese et al. 2016) have observed record-breaking low measurements over the last several decades. In contrast, no record of permafrost change with similar spatial or temporal resolution has been made (Biskaborn et al. 2015, Brown & Romanovsky 2008), despite the potential for significant impacts within and outside high-latitude regions. This review focuses on this lesser-known cryospheric domain to address a key societal question: What are key structural and functional properties of ecosystems that interact with changing permafrost, and how do these interactions affect local and global society? Permafrost is perennially frozen ground (rock, soil, ice) that underlies natural ecosystems and human communities in high-latitude areas of Earth. Permafrost is narrowly defined by temper- ature (<0◦C for at least 2 consecutive years), essentially marking the long-term phase change from liquid water to ice. As a result, permafrost plays a role in defining both the physical struc- ture of ground as well as modulating resource availability to organisms, including people, liv- ing on permafrost. In turn, permafrost itself is modified by the overlying ecosystem. The plant community, its associated surface soil organic layer, and other physical and biotic effects on ecosystem energy balance help define where and when permafrost persists (Shur & Jorgenson 2007). Ecological and geomorphological processes are highly sensitive to the phase change between water and ice. This transition point makes the structure and function of permafrost ecosystems unique and also vulnerable to major change in a warming climate. Here, we look beyond the classic definition of permafrost to include a broadened focus on the composition of permafrost and how it is changing. In particular, the ice content and the soil organic carbon in permafrost are key regulators of ecosystem function and provide important services to local people as well as to global society (Schuur et al. 2008). Temperature may classically define permafrost, but ecosystems and people also depend on other factors and resources such as water and nutrients, the availability of which is modulated by frozen ground. Temperature, water, and nutrients are examined within an ecosystem context to highlight aspects of permafrost ecosystems that make their ecological function unique. Access provided by University of Alaska - Fairbanks on 02/04/19. For personal use only. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2018.49:279-301. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org Permafrost is not static. It depends on regional and global climate conditions, the dynamics of ecosystems through ecological succession, and the impacts of people living within permafrost ecosystems. This review outlines the triggers of changing permafrost in the context of changing northern high-latitude regions as well as the implications for ecological succession and the fu- ture state of permafrost ecosystems including the organisms that live there. Finally, the review concludes with the impacts of current and projected ecosystem change on the needs of peo- ple living on permafrost as well as on global society. Indeed, the effects of permafrost change reach far outside the northern high latitudes to affect the entire Earth system. Over the last decade and more, the study of permafrost has grown from its geophysical roots to more fully realize the interplay between geophysical and biological processes that define ecosystem function. It is the hope of these authors that this ecological perspective of permafrost serves to identify areas 280 Schuur · Mack ES49CH13_Schuur ARI 26 September 2018 13:58 of both vulnerability and resilience as climate, ecological disturbance regimes, and the human footprint all continue to change in this sensitive and critical region of Earth. 2. WHAT DEFINES PERMAFROST AND WHERE IS IT? 2.1. Temperature Frozen ground can be considered a three-part system with (a) the active layer at the surface, which thaws each summer and refreezes in the winter; (b) the transient layer located below, which is ice rich compared with the active layer and has likely alternated in and out of permafrost over timescales of decades to centuries; and (c) permafrost, which is deepest, perennially frozen over timescales of centuries to millennia, and can contain massive blocks of ice interspersed with frozen soil (Shur & Jorgenson 2007). The thickness of the active layer ranges from tens of centimeters to several meters depending on the local climatic conditions as well as the thickness of the soil organic layer and structure of vegetation that develops during ecological succession and insulates the permafrost (Nelson et al. 2004). The active layer is the zone featuring heightened biological activity during the short growing season experienced by these ecosystems. Permafrost itself can extend several to hundreds of meters in depth, but the state of near-surface permafrost, defined as ∼0–3 m depth (Lawrence & Slater 2005), is often a much more useful metric relative to ecosystems and people living on top of frozen ground. The permafrost zone occupies 24% of the exposed land surface in the Northern Hemisphere, where most of it is located (entire area is 22.8 × 106 km2) (Brown et al. 2002; Zhang et al. 2000) (Figure 1). Within the Northern Hemisphere, 47% of the permafrost zone is classified as “con- tinuous permafrost,” defined as having >90% of the land surface underlain by permafrost approx- imately –15 to –2◦C. Another 19% is classified as “discontinuous permafrost,” where 50% to 90% of the land surface is underlain by permafrost. The remaining 34% of the total permafrost zone is split between “sporadic” and “isolated” permafrost, where 10% to 50% and <10% of the land surface is underlain by permafrost, respectively. The latter three categories have relatively warmer permafrost close to the freezing point, approximately –2 to 0◦C, interspersed by soils without per- mafrost. When permafrost temperature is relatively warm, ecosystem properties related to vegeta- tion structure, snow accumulation, and the soil organic layer, as well as human and natural distur- bances that affect them, exert relatively more influence on permafrost distribution ( Jorgenson et al. 2010). Although the majority of permafrost is terrestrial, an additional 3 × 106 km2 area of shallow continental shelf under the Arctic Ocean has the potential for permafrost (Brown et al. 2002). This undersea permafrost initially formed on land when sea levels were lower during the last glacial period (Strauss et al. 2013, Walter et al. 2007). Submergence with seawater over Access provided by University of Alaska - Fairbanks on 02/04/19. For personal use only. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2018.49:279-301. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Controls of Soil Organic Matter on Soil Thermal Dynamics in the Northern High Latitudes
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11103-1 OPEN Controls of soil organic matter on soil thermal dynamics in the northern high latitudes Dan Zhu 1, Philippe Ciais 1, Gerhard Krinner 2, Fabienne Maignan 1, Albert Jornet Puig1 & Gustaf Hugelius3,4 Permafrost warming and potential soil carbon (SOC) release after thawing may amplify climate change, yet model estimates of present-day and future permafrost extent vary widely, 1234567890():,; partly due to uncertainties in simulated soil temperature. Here, we derive thermal diffusivity, a key parameter in the soil thermal regime, from depth-specific measurements of monthly soil temperature at about 200 sites in the high latitude regions. We find that, among the tested soil properties including SOC, soil texture, bulk density, and soil moisture, SOC is the dominant factor controlling the variability of diffusivity among sites. Analysis of the CMIP5 model outputs reveals that the parameterization of thermal diffusivity drives the differences in simulated present-day permafrost extent among these models. The strong SOC-thermics coupling is crucial for projecting future permafrost dynamics, since the response of soil temperature and permafrost area to a rising air temperature would be impacted by potential changes in SOC. 1 Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, LSCE/IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Gif Sur Yvette 91191, France. 2 CNRS, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Institut de Géosciences de l’Environnement (IGE), Grenoble 38000, France. 3 Department of Physical Geography, Stockholm University, Stockholm 10691, Sweden. 4 Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm 10691, Sweden. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to D.Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Edaphic and Microclimatic Controls Over Permafrost Response to Fire in Interior Alaska
    Home Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience Edaphic and microclimatic controls over permafrost response to fire in interior Alaska This article has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text article. 2013 Environ. Res. Lett. 8 035013 (http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/3/035013) View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more Download details: IP Address: 137.229.80.42 The article was downloaded on 22/07/2013 at 18:39 Please note that terms and conditions apply. IOP PUBLISHING ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS Environ. Res. Lett. 8 (2013) 035013 (12pp) doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035013 Edaphic and microclimatic controls over permafrost response to fire in interior Alaska Dana R Nossov1,2, M Torre Jorgenson3, Knut Kielland1,2 and Mikhail Z Kanevskiy4 1 Department of Biology and Wildlife, University of Alaska Fairbanks, PO Box 756100, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA 2 Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, PO Box 757000, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA 3 Alaska Ecoscience, 2332 Cordes Drive, Fairbanks, AK 99709, USA 4 Institute of Northern Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks, PO Box 755910, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA E-mail: [email protected] Received 20 April 2013 Accepted for publication 21 June 2013 Published 10 July 2013 Online at stacks.iop.org/ERL/8/035013 Abstract Discontinuous permafrost in the North American boreal forest is strongly influenced by the effects of ecological succession on the accumulation of surface organic matter, making permafrost vulnerable to degradation resulting from fire disturbance.
    [Show full text]
  • Taiga Plains
    ECOLOGICAL REGIONS OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES Taiga Plains Ecosystem Classification Group Department of Environment and Natural Resources Government of the Northwest Territories Revised 2009 ECOLOGICAL REGIONS OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES TAIGA PLAINS This report may be cited as: Ecosystem Classification Group. 2007 (rev. 2009). Ecological Regions of the Northwest Territories – Taiga Plains. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, NT, Canada. viii + 173 pp. + folded insert map. ISBN 0-7708-0161-7 Web Site: http://www.enr.gov.nt.ca/index.html For more information contact: Department of Environment and Natural Resources P.O. Box 1320 Yellowknife, NT X1A 2L9 Phone: (867) 920-8064 Fax: (867) 873-0293 About the cover: The small photographs in the inset boxes are enlarged with captions on pages 22 (Taiga Plains High Subarctic (HS) Ecoregion), 52 (Taiga Plains Low Subarctic (LS) Ecoregion), 82 (Taiga Plains High Boreal (HB) Ecoregion), and 96 (Taiga Plains Mid-Boreal (MB) Ecoregion). Aerial photographs: Dave Downing (Timberline Natural Resource Group). Ground photographs and photograph of cloudberry: Bob Decker (Government of the Northwest Territories). Other plant photographs: Christian Bucher. Members of the Ecosystem Classification Group Dave Downing Ecologist, Timberline Natural Resource Group, Edmonton, Alberta. Bob Decker Forest Ecologist, Forest Management Division, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Hay River, Northwest Territories. Bas Oosenbrug Habitat Conservation Biologist, Wildlife Division, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories. Charles Tarnocai Research Scientist, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. Tom Chowns Environmental Consultant, Powassan, Ontario. Chris Hampel Geographic Information System Specialist/Resource Analyst, Timberline Natural Resource Group, Edmonton, Alberta.
    [Show full text]
  • Deforestation in Central Saskatchewan
    DEFORESTATION IN CENTRAL SASKATCHEWAN: EFFECTS ON LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE AND ECOSYSTEM CARBON DENSITIES A Thesis Submitted to the College ofGraduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfilment ofthe Requirements for the Degree ofDoctor ofPhilosophy in the Department ofPlant Sciences University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Michael Joseph Fitzsimmons Spring, 2003 © Copyright Michael Joseph Fitzsimmons, 2002. All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment ofthe requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying ofthis thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head ofthe Department or the Dean ofthe College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use ofthis thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made ofany material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use ofmaterial in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to: Head ofthe Department ofPlant Sciences University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7H 5A8 ABSTRACT Deforestation is recognized as a serious global problem that contributes to biodiversity loss, soil degradation and atmospheric change. This thesis is an investigation ofdeforestation in central Saskatchewan.
    [Show full text]
  • Stri Laurance Chapter 4 2010.Pdf
    CHAPTER 4 Habitat destruction: death by a thousand cuts William F. Laurance Humankind has dramatically transformed much 4.1 Habitat loss and fragmentation of the Earth’s surface and its natural ecosystems. Habitat destruction occurs when a natural habitat, This process is not new—it has been ongoing for such as a forest or wetland, is altered so dramati- millennia—but it has accelerated sharply over the cally that it no longer supports the species it origi- last two centuries, and especially in the last sev- nally sustained. Plant and animal populations are eral decades. destroyed or displaced, leading to a loss of biodi- Today, the loss and degradation of natural ha- versity (see Chapter 10). Habitat destruction is bitats can be likened to a war of attrition. Many considered the most important driver of species natural ecosystems are being progressively razed, extinction worldwide (Pimm and Raven 2000). bulldozed, and felled by axes or chainsaws, until Few habitats are destroyed entirely. Very often, only small scraps of their original extent survive. habitats are reduced in extent and simultaneously Forests have been hit especially hard: the global fragmented, leaving small pieces of original habi- area of forests has been reduced by roughly half tat persisting like islands in a sea of degraded over the past three centuries. Twenty-five nations land. In concert with habitat loss, habitat frag- have lost virtually all of their forest cover, and mentation is a grave threat to species survival another 29 more than nine-tenths of their forest (Laurance 2002; Sekercioglu 2002; (MEA 2005). Tropical forests are disappearing et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Shallow Taliks on Permafrost Thaw and Active Layer
    PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface RESEARCH ARTICLE The Influence of Shallow Taliks on Permafrost Thaw 10.1002/2017JF004469 and Active Layer Dynamics in Subarctic Canada Key Points: Ryan Connon1 , Élise Devoie2 , Masaki Hayashi3, Tyler Veness1, and William Quinton1 • Shallow, near-surface taliks in subarctic permafrost environments 1Cold Regions Research Centre, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2Department of Civil and fl in uence active layer thickness by 3 limiting the depth of freeze Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, Department of Geoscience, University of • Areas with taliks experience more Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada rapid thaw of underlying permafrost than areas without taliks • Proportion of areas with taliks can Abstract Measurements of active layer thickness (ALT) are typically taken at the end of summer, a time increase in years with high ground synonymous with maximum thaw depth. By definition, the active layer is the layer above permafrost that heat flux, potentially creating tipping point for permafrost thaw freezes and thaws annually. This study, conducted in peatlands of subarctic Canada, in the zone of thawing discontinuous permafrost, demonstrates that the entire thickness of ground atop permafrost does not always refreeze over winter. In these instances, a talik exists between the permafrost and active layer, and ALT Correspondence to: must therefore be measured by the depth of refreeze at the end of winter. As talik thickness increases at R. Connon, the expense of the underlying permafrost, ALT is shown to simultaneously decrease. This suggests that the [email protected] active layer has a maximum thickness that is controlled by the amount of energy lost from the ground to the atmosphere during winter.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 7: the Boreal Forest TEACHING
    TEACHING KIT Volume 7: The Boreal Forest National Forest Week 2006: September 24 to 30 The Canadian Forestry Association is pleased to announce that after careful consultation and consideration, in 2006 National Forest Week will move from spring to fall. Based on a 100-year legacy of facilitating forest education, the CFA believes this new approach will spur increased year-round learning opportunities for interested Canadians. Trends show that early education is key to capturing and fostering the interest of youth towards volunteerism, higher education and careers in the forest and environmental sectors. Developing the forestry leaders of tomorrow is critical to ensuring sustainability of our natural resources and the socio-economic and health benefits they provide for all Canadians. Integral to this learning process is the Canada's Forests Teaching Kit series, which has become the cornerstone of CFA’s education and outreach initiatives. Available free to educators, these kits provide tools for helping youth better understand the value of forest resources and the importance of using them wisely. Beginning in 2006, the annual kit publication date will change to coin- cide with National Forest Week each September. This is in response to overwhelming feedback from teachers across Canada indicating a strong preference to receive these materials at commencement of the school year for increased and enhanced integration into teaching plans and other outreach activities. In keeping with tradition, I invite you to join the CFA in celebrating Canada’s forests — in September and year-round: plant a tree, walk through a forest or learn about forest management. Your local forestry association can provide more ideas, teaching materials and information about forest activities in your area.
    [Show full text]
  • Predictive Modeling of Freezing and Thawing of Frost-Susceptible Soils
    PREDICTIVE MODELING OF FREEZING AND THAWING OF FROST-SUSCEPTIBLE SOILS Final Report Report Number: RC-1619 Michigan Department of Transportation Office of Research Administration 8885 Ricks Road Lansing, MI 48909 By Gilbert Baladi and Pegah Rajaei Michigan State University Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering 3546 Engineering Building East Lansing, MI 48824 September 2015 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. MDOT Project Manager RC-1619 N/A Richard Endres 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Predictive Modeling of Freezing and Thawing of Frost- September 2015 Susceptible Soils 6. Performing Organization Code N/A 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Org. Report No. Gilbert Baladi and Pegah Rajaei N/A Michigan State University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Michigan State University N/A Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 3546 Engineering 11. Contract No. East Lansing, Michigan 48824 2010-0294 11(a). Authorization No. Z9 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report & Period Covered Michigan Department of Transportation Final Report Research Administration 10/01/12 to 9/30/15 8885 Ricks Rd. P.O. Box 30049 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Lansing MI 48909 N/A 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract Frost depth is an essential factor in design of various transportation infrastructures. In frost susceptible soils, as soils freezes, water migrates through the soil voids below the freezing line towards the freezing front and causes excessive heave. The excessive heave can cause instability issues in the structure, therefore predicting the frost depth and resulting frost heave accurately can play a major role in the design.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Soil Property Uncertainties on Permafrost Thaw Projections: a Calibration-Constrained Analysis
    The Cryosphere, 10, 341–358, 2016 www.the-cryosphere.net/10/341/2016/ doi:10.5194/tc-10-341-2016 © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Effect of soil property uncertainties on permafrost thaw projections: a calibration-constrained analysis D. R. Harp1, A. L. Atchley1, S. L. Painter2, E. T. Coon1, C. J. Wilson1, V. E. Romanovsky3, and J. C. Rowland1 1Earth and Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA 2Climate Change Science Institute, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA 3Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, USA Correspondence to: D. R. Harp ([email protected]) Received: 5 May 2015 – Published in The Cryosphere Discuss.: 29 June 2015 Revised: 15 January 2016 – Accepted: 19 January 2016 – Published: 11 February 2016 Abstract. The effects of soil property uncertainties on per- peat residual saturation. By comparing the ensemble statis- mafrost thaw projections are studied using a three-phase sub- tics to the spread of projected permafrost metrics using dif- surface thermal hydrology model and calibration-constrained ferent climate models, we quantify the relative magnitude uncertainty analysis. The null-space Monte Carlo method of soil property uncertainty to another source of permafrost is used to identify soil hydrothermal parameter combina- uncertainty, structural climate model uncertainty. We show tions that are consistent with borehole temperature measure- that the effect of calibration-constrained uncertainty in soil ments at the study site, the Barrow Environmental Obser- properties, although significant, is less than that produced by vatory. Each parameter combination is then used in a for- structural climate model uncertainty for this location.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arctic-Boreal Vulnerability Experiment (Above)
    1 The Arctic-Boreal Vulnerability Experiment (ABoVE): A Concise Plan for a NASA-Sponsored Field Campaign Authors: Eric S. Kasischke (University of Maryland) Scott J. Goetz (Woods Hole Research Institute) John S. Kimball (University of Montana) Michelle M. Mack (University of Florida) Final Report October 2010 2 Foreward NASA’s Research Opportunities in Space and Earth Sciences released in 2008 called for proposals to conduct scoping studies to identify the scientific questions and develop the initial study design and implementation concept for a new NASA Terrestrial Ecology field campaign or related team project. In the spring of 2009, NASA selected two projects for funding, including a project entitled: “Vulnerability and Resiliency of Arctic and Sub-Arctic Landscapes (VuRSAL) - the Role of Interactions between Climate, Permafrost, Hydrology, and Disturbance in Driving Ecosystem Processes” (NASA Grant NNX09AH57G to the University of Maryland). This report contains the recommendations from this scoping study, which presents the Arctic-Boreal Vulnerability Experiment (ABoVE). NASA outlined eight expectations for each scoping study: 1. The science questions and issues to be addressed must be identified; 2. The current state-of-the-science must be addressed; 3. The potential for a major, significant scientific advancement must be described; 4. The central, critical role of NASA remote sensing must be explained; 5. The essential scientific components of the study must be described and why coordinated teamwork is required in their implementation. An overall study design identifying the required observational (e.g., spaceborne, airborne, and/or supporting in situ observations) and analytical (e.g., models, data, and information system) infrastructure must be developed; 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring of Active Layer Dynamics at a Permafrost Site on Svalbard Using Multi-Channel Ground-Penetrating Radar
    The Cryosphere, 4, 475–487, 2010 www.the-cryosphere.net/4/475/2010/ The Cryosphere doi:10.5194/tc-4-475-2010 © Author(s) 2010. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Monitoring of active layer dynamics at a permafrost site on Svalbard using multi-channel ground-penetrating radar S. Westermann1, U. Wollschlager¨ 2,*, and J. Boike1 1Alfred-Wegener-Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Telegrafenberg A43, 14473 Potsdam, Germany 2Institute of Environmental Physics, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany *now at: UFZ – Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany Received: 11 March 2010 – Published in The Cryosphere Discuss.: 22 March 2010 Revised: 28 October 2010 – Accepted: 29 October 2010 – Published: 8 November 2010 Abstract. Multi-channel ground-penetrating radar is used to mafrost areas. The novel non-invasive technique is partic- investigate the late-summer evolution of the thaw depth and ularly useful when the thaw depth exceeds 1.5 m, so that it the average soil water content of the thawed active layer at a is hardly accessible by manual probing. In addition, multi- high-arctic continuous permafrost site on Svalbard, Norway. channel ground-penetrating radar holds potential for map- Between mid of August and mid of September 2008, five ping the latent heat content of the active layer and for esti- surveys have been conducted in gravelly soil over transect mating weekly to monthly averages of the ground heat flux lengths of 130 and 175 m each. The maximum thaw depths during the thaw period. range from 1.6 m to 2.0 m, so that they are among the deepest thaw depths recorded in sediments on Svalbard so far.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphology of the Northeast Planning Area, National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska
    GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE NORTHEAST PLANNING AREA, NATIONAL PETROLEUM RESERVE-ALASKA. 2002 FINAL REPORT Prepared for ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. P.O. Box 100360 Anchorage, AK 995 10 And Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 3201 C Street, Suite 603 Anchorage, AK 99503 Prepared by M. Torre Jorgenson, Erik. R. Pullman, ABR, 1nc.-Environmental Research & Services PO Box 80410 Fairbanks, AK 99708 and Yuri L. Shu~ Dept. of Civil Engineering University of Alaska PO Box 755900 Fairbanks, AK 99775 April 2003 8 Printed on recycledpape,: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY When comparing relationships among- ice Permafrost development on the Arctic Coastal structures, lithofacies,-and terrain &its using data Plain in northern Alaska greatly affects the kom 31 cores (2-3 m), there were strong distribution of ground ice, engineering propetties relationships that can be used to partition the of the soil, ecological conditions at the ground variability in distribution of ice across the surface, lake-basin development, and response of landscape. Large differences were found in the the terrain to human activities. Of particular frequency of occurrence of the various ice interest for assessing potential impacts from oil structures among lithofacies: pore ice was nearly always associated with massive, inched, and development in the National Petroleum layered sands; lenticular and ataxitic ice were most ReserveAlaska (NPRA) are the identification of terrain relationships for predicting the nature and frequently associated with massive and layered distribution of ground ice across the landscape and fines, organic matrix ice was usually found in the evaluation of disturbance effects on permafrost. massive and layered organics and licfines. Accordingly, this study was designed to determine Reticulate ice was broadly distributed among fine the nature and abundance of ground ice at multiple and organic lithofacies.
    [Show full text]