DOCSLIB.ORG

Parler, a Social Network That Attracted Trump Fans, Returns Online - the New York Times

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parler, a Social Network That Attracted Trump Fans, Returns Online - the New York Times 3/6/2021 Parler, a Social Network That Attracted Trump Fans, Returns Online - The New York Times Parler, a Social Network That Attracted Trump Fans, Returns Online After being cut off by Amazon and other tech giants, Parler worked for weeks to find a way to get back on the internet. By Jack Nicas Feb. 15, 2021 SAN FRANCISCO — Parler, the social network that drew millions of Trump supporters before disappearing from the internet, is back online a month after Amazon and other tech giants cut off the company for hosting calls for violence around the time of the Capitol riot. Getting iced out by the tech giants turned Parler into a cause célèbre for conservatives who complained they were being censored, as well as a test case for the openness of the internet. It was unclear if the social network, which had positioned itself as a free speech and lightly moderated site, could survive after it had been blacklisted by the biggest tech companies. For weeks, it appeared the answer was no. But on Monday, for the first time since Jan. 10, typing parler.com into a web browser returned a page to log into the social network — a move that had required weeks of work by the small company and that had led to the departure of its chief executive. Parler executives did not respond to requests for comment on Monday. After many large web-hosting firms rejected Parler, the site came back online with the help of a small provider near Los Angeles called SkySilk. Kevin Matossian, SkySilk’s chief executive, said in a statement that he was helping Parler to support free speech. For other services required to run a large website, Parler relied on help from a Russian firm that once worked for the Russian government and a Seattle firm that once supported a neo-Nazi site. Parler’s return appeared to be a victory for small companies that challenge the dominance of Big Tech. The company had sought to portray its plight about the power of companies like Amazon, which stopped hosting Parler’s website on its computer servers, and Apple and Google, which removed Parler’s mobile app from their app stores. Parler had become a hub for right-wing conversation over the past year, as millions of people on the far right had flocked to the platform over what they perceived as censorship of conservative voices by Facebook, Twitter and Google. Much of the content on Parler was benign, but for months ahead of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, the site also hosted hate speech, misinformation and calls for violence. Days after the riot, Amazon, Apple and Google said they had cut off Parler because it showed that it could not consistently enforce its own rules against posts that incited violence. Apple and Google have said they would allow Parler’s app to return if the company could prove it could effectively police its social network. After Amazon booted Parler from its web-hosting service, Parler sued it, accusing it of antitrust violations and breaking its contract. A federal judge said last month that Amazon’s contract allowed it to terminate service and declined to force the company to keep hosting Parler, as the start-up had requested. Parler had more than 15 million users when it went offline and was one of the fastest growing apps in the United States. It is largely financed by Rebekah Mercer, one of the Republican Party’s biggest benefactors. John Matze, a software engineer who was Parler’s co-founder and chief executive, said earlier this month that Ms. Mercer had effectively fired him over disagreements on how to run the site. Ms. Mercer hired Mark Meckler, a leading voice in the Tea Party movement, to replace Mr. Matze. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/15/technology/parler-back-online.html?searchResultPosition=1 1/2 3/6/2021 Parler, a Social Network That Attracted Trump Fans, Returns Online - The New York Times Before the site’s return on Monday, Parler executives had said they were rejected by multiple web-hosting companies that either feared a public-relations backlash or a cyberattack if they agreed to support the site. On Monday morning, after Parler suddenly appeared on the web again, data behind its website showed that it was being supported by SkySilk. Hours later, Mr. Matossian, SkySilk’s C.E.O., emailed a statement that said he was taking a stand for Parler. “SkySilk does not advocate nor condone hate, rather, it advocates the right to private judgment and rejects the role of being the judge, jury and executioner. Unfortunately, too many of our fellow technology providers seem to differ,” he said. “While we may disagree with some of the sentiment found on the Parler platform, we cannot allow First Amendment rights to be hampered or restricted by anyone or any organization.” About a week after it went offline, Parler set up a basic webpage for people trying to visit its social network with simple messages that said the company was working to get back online and notes of support from conservatives like Sean Hannity, the Fox News host, and Senator Rand Paul, Republican from Kentucky. That page, which was so simple it could have been hosted from a single laptop, still required cybersecurity protections to stay online, in part because Parler has been under attack from internet vigilantes who believe it helped play a role in the Capitol riot. To stay online, Parler got help from DDoS-Guard, a Russian firm, which raised concerns among some internet researchers that the Russian government could surveil Parler users. Parler also partnered with Epik, a Seattle company, for its domain registration, a basic service of the internet. Epik has helped support other fringe sites that lost their support from other companies, including the Daily Stormer, a neo-Nazi site. Mr. Matze founded Parler in 2018 with a fellow programmer outside of Las Vegas, aiming to tap into growing discontent with Silicon Valley, particularly among people on the far right, who were finding themselves increasingly restricted on mainstream social networks as Facebook and Twitter cracked down on hate speech, threats and misinformation. Ms. Mercer bankrolled the site. Other investors include Dan Bongino, a former Secret Service agent and Fox News pundit, and Jeffrey Wernick, an early adopter of Bitcoin who is now Parler’s chief operating officer. Parler plans to eventually make money by selling ads, though that business was nascent when it shut down. Parler is essentially a clone of Twitter, where users can broadcast messages to their followers, though it is harder to navigate and often much slower, an issue that could get even worse without the support of Amazon. It is also dominated by conservatives. The website prompts new users to follow a series of conservative voices, including Mr. Hannity, the actress Kirstie Alley, and Phil Robertson, the star of the reality TV show “Duck Dynasty.” Parler gained momentum in 2020, particularly after the November election when Facebook and Twitter began labeling posts from former President Donald J. Trump asserting that the election was rigged. So many new users signed up that at times the flood overwhelmed Parler’s systems and caused the site to crash or slow down. Ahead of the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, the conversation on Parler turned dark, with users calling for fellow “patriots” to take back the United States and some calling for violence, including coordinated assassinations of Democrats. Some users posted images of guns they planned to bring to the rally in Washington and others discussed streets to avoid police and tools to break into buildings. In the days after the riot, Facebook and Twitter removed Mr. Trump’s account from their sites, causing millions more people concerned about what they saw as censorship to register accounts with Parler. It became the No. 1 app on Apple and Google’s app stores. Then Apple and Google removed the app, and Amazon cut off its service. Jack Nicas covers technology from San Francisco. Before joining The Times, he spent seven years at The Wall Street Journal covering technology, aviation and national news. @jacknicas • Facebook A version of this article appears in print on , Section B, Page 1 of the New York edition with the headline: Parler Found Its Way Back In a Month https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/15/technology/parler-back-online.html?searchResultPosition=1 2/2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Download
    Proceedings of the Fifteenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2021) A Large Open Dataset from the Parler Social Network Max Aliapoulios1, Emmi Bevensee2, Jeremy Blackburn3, Barry Bradlyn4, Emiliano De Cristofaro5, Gianluca Stringhini6, Savvas Zannettou7 1New York University, 2SMAT, 3Binghamton University, 4University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 5University College London, 6Boston University, 7Max Planck Institute for Informatics [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract feasible in technical terms to create a new social media plat- Parler is as an “alternative” social network promoting itself form, but marketing the platform towards specific polarized as a service that allows to “speak freely and express yourself communities is an extremely successful strategy to bootstrap openly, without fear of being deplatformed for your views.” a user base. In other words, there is a subset of users on Twit- Because of this promise, the platform become popular among ter, Facebook, Reddit, etc., that will happily migrate to a new users who were suspended on mainstream social networks platform, especially if it advertises moderation policies that for violating their terms of service, as well as those fearing do not restrict the growth and spread of political polariza- censorship. In particular, the service was endorsed by several tion, conspiracy theories, extremist ideology, hateful and vi- conservative public figures, encouraging people to migrate olent speech, and mis- and dis-information. from traditional social networks. After the storming of the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, Parler has been progressively de- Parler.
    [Show full text]
  • Riots: a Comparative Study of Twitter and Parler
    111 Capitol (Pat)riots: A comparative study of Twitter and Parler HITKUL, IIIT - Delhi, India AVINASH PRABHU∗, DIPANWITA GUHATHAKURTA∗, JIVITESH JAIN∗, MALLIKA SUBRA- MANIAN∗, MANVITH REDDY∗, SHRADHA SEHGAL∗, and TANVI KARANDIKAR∗, IIIT - Hy- derabad, India AMOGH GULATI∗ and UDIT ARORA∗, IIIT - Delhi, India RAJIV RATN SHAH, IIIT - Delhi, India PONNURANGAM KUMARAGURU, IIIT - Delhi, India On 6 January 2021, a mob of right-wing conservatives stormed the USA Capitol Hill interrupting the session of congress certifying 2020 Presidential election results. Immediately after the start of the event, posts related to the riots started to trend on social media. A social media platform which stood out was a free speech endorsing social media platform Parler; it is being claimed as the platform on which the riots were planned and talked about. Our report presents a contrast between the trending content on Parler and Twitter around the time of riots. We collected data from both platforms based on the trending hashtags and draw comparisons based on what are the topics being talked about, who are the people active on the platforms and how organic is the content generated on the two platforms. While the content trending on Twitter had strong resentments towards the event and called for action against rioters and inciters, Parler content had a strong conservative narrative echoing the ideas of voter fraud similar to the attacking mob. We also find a disproportionately high manipulation of traffic on Parler when compared to Twitter. Additional Key Words and Phrases: Social Computing, Data Mining, Social Media Analysis, Capitol Riots, Parler, Twitter 1 INTRODUCTION Misinformation of the United States of America’s presidential election results being fraudulent has been spreading across the world since the elections in November 2020.1 Public protests and legal cases were taking place across the states against the allegation of voter fraud and manhandling of mail-in ballots.2 This movement took a violent height when a mob attacked the Capitol Hill building to stop certification of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Resilience & Confronting Risk In
    BUILDING RESILIENCE & CONFRONTING RISK IN THE COVID-19 ERA A PARENTS & CAREGIVERS GUIDE TO ONLINE RADICALIZATION POLARIZATION AND EXTREMISM RESEARCH AND INNOVATION LAB (PERIL) PERIL brings the resources and expertise of the university sector to bear CONTENTS on the problem of growing youth polarization and extremist radicalization, through scalable research, intervention, and public education ideas to PARENT & CAREGIVER GUIDE 3 reduce rising polarization and hate. WHAT IS ONLINE RADICALIZATION? WHY SHOULD YOU CARE? 4 SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER NEW RISKS IN THE COVID-19 ERA 5 The SPLC seeks to be a catalyst for racial justice in the South and RECOGNIZING WARNING SIGNS 6 beyond, working in partnership with communities to dismantle white UNDERSTANDING THE DRIVERS 7 supremacy, strengthen intersectional movements, and advance the ENGAGE AND EMPOWER 9 human rights of all people. RESPONDING TO HATE 11 HOW TO GET HELP 12 APPENDIX: STAYING ALERT TO SITES, PLATFORMS AND APPS FREQUENTLY EXPLOITED BY EXTREMISTS 17 ENDNOTES 19 CREDITS 20 ILLUSTRATIONS BY CLAUDIA WHITAKER PARENT & CAREGIVER GUIDE Who is this guide for? We wrote this guide with a wide Whether you live with a young person, or work virtually range of caregivers in mind. with youth, radicalization to extremism is something we all should be concerned about. Extremists looking Caregivers living with children and young adults. This to recruit and convert children are predatory. Like all includes parents, grandparents, foster parents, extended forms of child exploitation, extremist recruitment drives families, and residential counselors who are the a wedge between young people and the adults they would guardians and caregivers of children and youth living typically trust.
    [Show full text]
  • 1396 the Platforms of Our Discontent (Social Media, Social Destruction)
    #1396 The Pla-orms of Our Discontent (Social Media, Social Destruc?on) JAY TOMLINSON - HOST, BEST OF THE LEFT: [00:00:00] Welcome to this episode of the award-winning Best of the Le; Podcast in which we shall learn about the role that social media plays in the radicalizaAon of discontented communiAes, and engage in the debate over content moderaAon and de-plaDorming of individuals. Clips today are from The Weeds, Newsbroke from AJ Plus, On the Media, Off-Kilter, a piece of a speech from Sasha Baron Cohen, Big Tech, Vox ConversaAons, the Medhi Hasan Show, and Your Undivided AVenAon. Why everyone hates Big Tech, with The Verge's Nilay Patel - The Weeds - Air Date 7-19-19 NILAY PATEL: [00:00:34] I think one thing everyone will agree on, just universally, is that these companies are not necessarily well-run. And even if they were perfectly run, the nature of wriAng and enforcing speech regulaAon is such that you're sAll gonna do a bad job. The United States has been trying to develop a free speech policy in our courts for 220+ years and we're preVy bad at it, but four guys at Facebook aren't going to do a good job up in 20 years. So there's that problem, where does the line cross from being a preVy funny joke to being overtly bigoted? It really depends on context. We all understand this. So it absolutely depends on the context. It depends on who you think you are speaking to, whether it's a group of your friends or whether suddenly TwiVer's algorithm grabs you and amplifies you to millions of people.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDENIABLE the Survey of Hostility to Religion in America
    UNDENIABLE The Survey of Hostility to Religion in America 2014 Edition Editorial Team Kelly Shackelford Chairman Jeffrey Mateer Executive Editor Justin Butterfield Editor-in-chief Michael Andrews Assistant Editor Past Contributors Bryan Clegg An Open Letter to the American PEople UNDENIABLE To our fellow citizens: The Survey of Hostility to Religion in America Hostility to religion and religious freedom in America—institutional, pervasive, damaging hostility—can no longer reasonably be denied. And 2014 Edition yet there remain deniers. Because denial of these attacks is a mortal threat to the survival and health of Kelly Shackelford, chairman our republic, Liberty Institute and Family Research Council collaborated in 2012 to publish a survey documenting the frequency and severity of incidents Jeffrey Mateer, executive editor of hostility. In the 2013 survey entitled Undeniable, the research team led by Justin Butterfield, editor-in-chief a Harvard-trained constitutional attorney found almost twice the number of incidents in the previous twelve months than all the incidents found from Michael Andrews, assistant editor several years’ past. The rate of hostility was increasing at an alarming rate. This year in Undeniable: The Survey of Hostility to Religion 2014, the team Copyright © 2013–2014 Liberty Institute. of researchers again documented an alarming increase in the number of All rights reserved. hostile incidents toward religion from the year before. The rate of hostility is continuing to climb. We offer Undeniable 2014 to you, the American people, as an alarm bell This publication is not to be used for legal advice. Because the law is ringing in the night. We believe the many public opinion surveys showing constantly changing and each factual situation is unique, Liberty Institute that you, the people, are still a religious people.
    [Show full text]
  • Call a Convention to Amend the Constitution
    Intelligence Squared U.S. - 1 - 12/8/2016 December 7, 2016 Ray Padgett | [email protected] Mark Satlof | [email protected] T: 718.522.7171 Intelligence Squared U.S. Call a Convention to Amend the Constitution For the Motion: Lawrence Lessig, Mark Meckler Against the Motion: David Super, Walter Olson Moderator: John Donvan AUDIENCE RESULTS Before the debate: After the debate: 33% FOR 44% FOR 22% AGAINST 43% AGAINST 45% UNDECIDED 13% UNDECIDED Start Time (00:00:00) John Donvan: Hi. Jeffrey. So, Jeffrey, I'll let introduce you first. Well, I've introduced you both by name. But Jeffrey, you are president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, and you're also a professor at the George Washington University School of Law. And Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz is the director of the Rosenkranz Foundation and a professor at Georgetown Law. But, Jeffrey, I'll let you tell the story about how it comes about that we're in partnership with the National Constitution Center today, including what the NCC is. Jeffrey Rosen: Wonderful. Well, ladies and gentlemen, the partnership between the National Constitution Center and Intelligence Squared is one of the crown jewels of our Constitutional programming. And the National Constitution Center is a very special. It's this beautiful museum in Philadelphia of the Constitution on Independence Mall right across from Independence Hall. 0:00:48 But it's also the only place in the United States where the charter from the U.S. Congress to host bipartisan or multi-partisan Constitutional debates and education. And this debate series is the core of our efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Official General Election Results
    STATE OF ALABAMA Canvass of Results for the Special General Election held on December 12, 2017 Pursuant to Chapter 12 of Title 17 of the Code of Alabama, 1975, we, the undersigned, hereby certify that the results of the Special General Election for the office of United States Senator and for proposed constitutional amendments held in Alabama on Tuesday, December 12, 2017, were opened and counted by us and that the results so tabulated are recorded on the following pages with an appendix, organized by county, recording the write-in votes cast as certified by each applicable county for the office of United States Senator. In Testimony Whereby, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Great and Principal Seal of the State of Alabama at the State Capitol, in the City of Montgomery, on this the 28th day of December,· the year 2017. Steve Marshall Attorney General John Merrill °\ Secretary of State Special General Election Results December 12, 2017 U.S. Senate Geneva Amendment Lamar, Amendment #1 Lamar, Amendment #2 (Act 2017-313) (Act 2017-334) (Act 2017-339) Doug Jones (D) Roy Moore (R) Write-In Yes No Yes No Yes No Total 673,896 651,972 22,852 3,290 3,146 2,116 1,052 843 2,388 Autauga 5,615 8,762 253 Baldwin 22,261 38,566 1,703 Barbour 3,716 2,702 41 Bibb 1,567 3,599 66 Blount 2,408 11,631 180 Bullock 2,715 656 7 Butler 2,915 2,758 41 Calhoun 12,331 15,238 429 Chambers 4,257 3,312 67 Cherokee 1,529 4,006 109 Chilton 2,306 7,563 132 Choctaw 2,277 1,949 17 Clarke 4,363 3,995 43 Clay 990 2,589 19 Cleburne 600 2,468 30 Coffee 3,730 8,063
    [Show full text]
  • Ccu's New President
    STUDENT CENTER UPDATE CCU2THEWORLD ALUMNI STORIES FALL 2016 CCU’S NEW PRESIDENT: DR. DON SWEETING Feature Story (Page 10) ccu.edu/alumni LETTER FROM THE VICE PRESIDENT | Fall 2016 Dear Friends, The past year has been a whirlwind of emotions. We grieved, as a community, the loss of our great leader, President Bill Armstrong. And, on October 1st, we welcomed a new president at the helm of our beloved university. As always, it is our goal to keep you informed about and also proud to be associated with Colorado Christian University. In this edition of BEYOND, you will see some of the ways CCU is engaging with the broader community through public policy and political science; some of the wonderful events and various programs going on; and you’ll learn about the man whom the board of trustees unanimously voted to be our next president. As we move forward into a new era at CCU, we do so trusting always in the grace and sovereignty of our Lord Jesus Christ. We are excited to introduce you to CCU’s new president, Dr. Donald Sweeting. You can read more about him on page 10, but I’d like to share with you my perspective on the man God has appointed to this position. After a decade under the guidance and leadership of President Bill Armstrong, this University needs a president who stands boldly for the convictions and values that CCU holds. Dr. Sweeting does just that. And, having served on CCU’s board of trustees for 11 years, Dr. Don Sweeting has an inside understanding of the University’s Statement of Faith, Strategic Objectives, mission and vision statements, and our pursuit to become a great university.
    [Show full text]
  • How Indirect Intermediaries Shape Online Speech
    Mitchell 1 Anna Mitchell Professor Nate Persily INTLPOL 323 December 16, 2018 Hidden Censors: How Indirect Intermediaries Shape Online Speech 1. Introduction “Literally, I woke up in a bad mood and decided someone shouldn’t be allowed on the internet. No one should have that power.” After a whirlwind five days of social media protests and internal tension, Matthew Prince, the CEO of Cloudflare, an Internet-services company, decided to terminate its contract with The Daily Stormer. The Internet’s most popular neo-Nazi website had vanished from the Web.1 Cloudflare’s content distribution network (CDN), improving the Stormer’s performance and protecting it from distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks, had allowed the site to stay afloat for months or years. But that changed in 2017 during a period of tense racial relations in the United States. From August 11 to 12, the Daily Stormer helped organize the white supremacist Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia. Soon after, it published articles calling murdered protestor Heather Heyer a “sloppy lard ass” and labeling her death an accidental heart attack.2 Reaction was swift. The next day, activist Amy Suskind tagged web hosting service GoDaddy in a Twitter post: “@GoDaddy you host The Daily Stormer - they posted this on their site. Please retweet if you think this hate should be taken down & banned.”3 Within 24 hours, GoDaddy responded by withdrawing hosting services. When the Stormer tried to switch to Google, it soon followed suit.4 Zoho refused to provide email service,5 and Twitter shut down Mitchell 2 associated accounts.6 With multiple major companies withdrawing services, it became increasingly difficult for the Stormer to host and propagate content.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Economic Battle Plan
    Phil Robertson - Unplugged 2.48 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 65) Background Briefing: While the world around us may seem crazy, there is a bigger plan. Security threats, economic details, money, and fights for freedom may at times feel overwhelming. Sometimes, it is good to sit back and keep perspective on what is most important in life. This week your briefing moves from the DC swamp to the beautiful Louisiana swamp for a fresh perspective with Phil Robertson. Learn the most important topic he discussed with President Trump. Your Mission: Love your God, Trust Your God, Fear Your God, Practice Capitalism. (OSINT)– Open Sourced Intelligence Briefing Open Sourced Intelligence Briefing. This includes quotes, dialogues and summaries of Economic War Room conversations with Kevin Freeman and Phil Robertson. Phil Robertson is an American icon, professional hunter, businessman (Duck Commander company), and reality television star on the popular series “Duck Dynasty.” He is also featured on the television show Duck Commander, a hunting program on the Outdoor Channel as well as “Into the Woods”, on BlazeTV.com. “If we have food and clothing. We will be content with that. America has lost is the ability to be content. They are always nervous. They seem to be mad when they get up in the morning and they have their hand out. The young people especially, you know, ask ‘who’s going to help me? You owe me! ‘Entitlements,’ just the word gets me. They’re entitled because they are alive and breathing on planet Earth?” –Phil Robertson page 1 Phil Robertson - Unplugged 2.48 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 65) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shocking Deep State Connections of the Anti-Trump Cabal Dan Bongino - Pdf Free Book
    pdf Follow The Money: The Shocking Deep State Connections Of The Anti-Trump Cabal Dan Bongino - pdf free book Download Follow the Money: The Shocking Deep State Connections of the Anti-Trump Cabal Online Free, Follow the Money: The Shocking Deep State Connections of the Anti-Trump Cabal Ebook Download, Read Best Book Online Follow the Money: The Shocking Deep State Connections of the Anti-Trump Cabal, Follow the Money: The Shocking Deep State Connections of the Anti-Trump Cabal Free PDF Online, Follow the Money: The Shocking Deep State Connections of the Anti-Trump Cabal Ebooks, Read Follow the Money: The Shocking Deep State Connections of the Anti-Trump Cabal Book Free, by Dan Bongino pdf Follow the Money: The Shocking Deep State Connections of the Anti-Trump Cabal, Free Download Follow the Money: The Shocking Deep State Connections of the Anti-Trump Cabal Best Book, Read Follow the Money: The Shocking Deep State Connections of the Anti-Trump Cabal Ebook Download, Read Follow the Money: The Shocking Deep State Connections of the Anti-Trump Cabal Full Collection Dan Bongino, Read Online Follow the Money: The Shocking Deep State Connections of the Anti-Trump Cabal E-Books, Read Best Book Online Follow the Money: The Shocking Deep State Connections of the Anti-Trump Cabal, Follow the Money: The Shocking Deep State Connections of the Anti-Trump Cabal Ebook Download, Follow the Money: The Shocking Deep State Connections of the Anti-Trump Cabal Ebooks, Free Download Follow the Money: The Shocking Deep State Connections of the Anti-Trump Cabal
    [Show full text]
  • Qanon and Facebook
    The Boom Before the Ban: QAnon and Facebook Ciaran O’Connor, Cooper Gatewood, Kendrick McDonald and Sarah Brandt 2 ‘THE GREAT REPLACEMENT’: THE VIOLENT CONSEQUENCES OF MAINSTREAMED EXTREMISM / Document title: About this report About NewsGuard This report is a collaboration between the Institute Launched in March 2018 by media entrepreneur and for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) and the nonpartisan award-winning journalist Steven Brill and former Wall news-rating organisation NewsGuard. It analyses Street Journal publisher Gordon Crovitz, NewsGuard QAnon-related contents on Facebook during a provides credibility ratings and detailed “Nutrition period of increased activity, just before the platform Labels” for thousands of news and information websites. implemented moderation of public contents spreading NewsGuard rates all the news and information websites the conspiracy theory. Combining quantitative and that account for 95% of online engagement across the qualitative analysis, this report looks at key trends in US, UK, Germany, France, and Italy. NewsGuard products discussions around QAnon, prominent accounts in that include NewsGuard, HealthGuard, and BrandGuard, discussion, and domains – particularly news websites which helps marketers concerned about their brand – that were frequently shared alongside QAnon safety, and the Misinformation Fingerprints catalogue of contents on Facebook. This report also recommends top hoaxes. some steps to be taken by technology companies, governments and the media when seeking to counter NewsGuard rates each site based on nine apolitical the spread of problematic conspiracy theories like criteria of journalistic practice, including whether a QAnon on social media. site repeatedly publishes false content, whether it regularly corrects or clarifies errors, and whether it avoids deceptive headlines.
    [Show full text]