List of Participants Luxembourg, 25 April, 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

GENERAL AFFAIRS COUNCIL (COHESION) List of Participants Luxembourg, 25 April, 2017 Belgium: Mr Paul MAGNETTE Minister-President Bulgaria: Mr Malina KROUMOVA Deputy Prime Minister for EU Funds Czech Republic: Ms Karla ŠLECHTOVÁ Minister of Regional Development Denmark: Ms Lone Dencker WISBORG Political Director Germany: Mr Thomas ECKERT Antici Estonia: Mr Mihhail KORB Minister for Public Administration Ireland: Mr Paschal DONOHOE Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform Greece: Mr Andreas PAPASTAVROU Permanent Representative Spain: Mr Pablo GARCIA-BERDOY Permanent Representative France: Mr Pierre SELLAL Permanent Representative Croatia: Ms Gabrijela ŽALAC Minister for Regional Development and EU Funds Italy: Mr Claudio DE VICENTI Minister responsible for Territorial Cohesion and Southern Italy Cyprus: Mr George GEORGHIOU Permanent Secretary, Directorate General for European Programmes, Coordination and Development Latvia: Mr Armands EBERHARDS Deputy State Secretary on EU Funds Issues Lithuania: Ms Loreta MASKALIOVIENĖ Deputy Minister for Finance Luxembourg Mr Camille GIRA State Secretary for Sustainable Development and Infrastructure Hungary: Mr László KRISTÓFFY Antici Malta: Mr Ian BORG Parliamentary Secretary for the EU Presidency 2017 and for EU Funds within the Ministry for European Affairs and Implementation of the Electoral Manifesto Netherlands: Mr Pieter de GOOIJER Permanent Representative Austria: Mr Walter GRAHAMMER Permanent Representative Poland: Mr Paweł CHORĄŻY Deputy State Secretary, Ministry of Development Portugal: Mr Pedro MARQUES Minister for Planning and Infrastructure Ms Margarida MARQUES Secretary of State of European Affairs Romania: Ms Rovana PLUMB Minister with responsibility for European Funds Slovenia: Ms Alenka SMERKOLJ Minister without portfolio for Development, Strategic Projects and Cohesion Slovakia: Mr Peter PELLEGRINI Deputy Prime Minister for Investments Finland: Ms Pilvi-Sisko VIERROS-VILLENEUVE Permanent Representative Sweden: Ms Lars DANIELSSON Permanent Representative United Kingdom: Mr David JONES Minister of State, Department for Exiting the European Union Commission: Ms Corina CREȚU Member .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
[Show full text]
Trade Paradiplomacy and the Politics of International Economic Law: the Inclusion of Quebec and the Exclusion of Wallonia in the CETA Negotiations
New Political Economy ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cnpe20 Trade Paradiplomacy and the Politics of International Economic Law: The Inclusion of Quebec and the Exclusion of Wallonia in the CETA Negotiations Stéphane Paquin To cite this article: Stéphane Paquin (2021): Trade Paradiplomacy and the Politics of International Economic Law: The Inclusion of Quebec and the Exclusion of Wallonia in the CETA Negotiations, New Political Economy, DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2021.1879761 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1879761 Published online: 28 Jan 2021. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cnpe20 NEW POLITICAL ECONOMY https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1879761 Trade Paradiplomacy and the Politics of International Economic Law: The Inclusion of Quebec and the Exclusion of Wallonia in the CETA Negotiations Stéphane Paquin École nationale d’administration publique, Québec, Canada ABSTRACT KEYWORDS International trade negotiations are no longer largely limited to federal Trade paradiplomacy; government’s constitutional jurisdictions. In this context, substate international economic law; governments, like Quebec and Wallonia, are aware that their ability to inclusion and exclusion; formulate and implement policy, are subject to negotiations in trade Quebec; Wallonia; CETA negotiations talks. This article compares the role of Quebec and Wallonia in the CETA negotiations. While Wallonia was able to force the inclusion of an interpretative legal instrument to clarify certain parts of CETA, Quebec, like the other Canadian provinces, was able to inﬂuence the negotiation from within.
[Show full text]
Green Recovery Call to Action & Signatories 121
GREENRECOVERY REBOOT & REBOOST our economies for a sustainable future Call for mobilisation The coronavirus crisis is shaking the whole world, with devastating consequences across Europe. We are being put to the test. We are suffering and mourning our losses, and this crisis is testing the limits of our system. It is also a test of our great European solidarity and of our institutions, which acted fast at the start of the crisis to deploy measures to protect us. The crisis is still ongoing, but we will see the light at the end of the tunnel, and by fighting together, we will beat the virus. Never have we faced such a challenging situation in peacetime. The fight against the pandemic is our top priority and everything that is needed to stop it and eradicate the virus must be done. We welcome and strongly support all the actions developed by governments, EU institutions, local authorities, scientists, medical staff, volunteers, citizens and economic actors. In this tremendously difficult situation, we are also facing another crisis: a shock to our economy tougher than the 2008 crisis. The major shock to the economy and workers created by the pandemic calls for a strong coordinated economic response. We therefore welcome the declaration of European leaders stating that they will do “whatever it takes” to tackle the social and economic consequences of this crisis. However, what worked for the 2008 financial crisis may not be sufficient to overcome this one. The economic recovery will only come with massive investments to protect and create jobs and to support all the companies, regions and sectors that have suffered from the economy coming to a sudden halt.
[Show full text]
European Alliance for a Green Recovery
Launch of the European alliance for a Green Recovery Press Release Under embargo until 14/04 7:00am At the initiative of Pascal Canfin, Chair of the Environment Committee at the European Parliament, 180 political decision-makers, business leaders, trade unions, NGOs, and think tanks have come together to form a European alliance for a Green Recovery. In the face of the coronavirus crisis, the biggest challenge Europe has faced in peacetime, with devastating consequences and a shock to the economy tougher than the 2008 crisis, Ministers from 11 countries, 79 cross-party MEPs from 17 Member States, 37 CEOs, 28 business associations representing 10 different sectors, trade union confederation representing members from 90 national trade union organisations and 10 trade union federations, 7 NGOs and 6 think tanks, have committed to working together to create, support and implement solutions to prepare our economies for the world of tomorrow. This first pan-European call for mobilisation on post-crisis green investment packages will work to build the recovery and transformation plans which enshrine the fight against climate change and biodiversity as a key pillar of the economic strategy. Sharing the belief that the economic recovery will only come with massive investments to protect and create jobs and to support all companies, regions and sectors that have suffered from the economy coming to a sudden halt, the alliance commits to contribute to the post-crisis investment decisions needed to reboot and reboost our economy. Covid-19 will not make climate change and nature degradation go away. The fight against this crisis will not be won without a solid economic response.
[Show full text]
The State of EU Studies in France », in Federiga Bindi the STATE of EU STUDIES in FRANCE and Kjell A
OLIVIER COSTA Olivier Costa, « The state of EU studies in France », in Federiga Bindi THE STATE OF EU STUDIES IN FRANCE and Kjell A. Eliassen (ed.), Analyzing European Union Politics, Rome, Il Mulino, 2012, p. 195‐218. France is one of the founding members of the European Communities. It has played an active role in the definition of the Manuscript completed in May 2011 Community method. French lawyers have soon devoted much attention to European integration, since some were closely involved in the drafting of the treaties. Economists have also taken this phenomenon seriously at an early stage. On the contrary, for a long time, French political scientists paid little attention to Europe. In the 1980s, European studies were less developed in France than in the French speaking parts of Belgium, Switzerland or even Canada. Since the end of the 1990s, things have evolved significantly: today many French political scientists are working on EU matters and a significant number of them are defining themselves as EU specialists. However, the involvement of French scholars in the international debates remains quite limited and the landscape of French EU studies keeps its originality. It may seem artificial to underline this French specificity since some of the most prominent EU researchers in France appear to be Austrian (Sabine Saurugger), Belgian (Renaud Dehousse), English (Andy Smith), German/Argentinean (Emiliano Grossman) or Finish (Niilo Kauppi). Also, many French scholars have made their academic education outside France, like Virginie Guiraudon (Harvard) or Nicolas Jabko (Berkeley), or are still holding positions outside France, in EUI Florence (Yves Mény, Pascal Vénesson), the LSE (Michael Bruter), Princeton (Sophie Meunier), Université libre de Bruxelles/ULB (François Forêt, Jean-Marc Ferry, Amandine Crespy) or Copenhagen Business School (Magali Gravier).
[Show full text]
17.3.2021 A9-0033/1 Amendment 1 István Ujhelyi, Cláudia Monteiro De
17.3.2021 A9-0033/1 Amendment 1 István Ujhelyi, Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar, Elena Kountoura, Johan Danielsson, Giuseppe Ferrandino, Josianne Cutajar, Isabel García Muñoz, Benoît Lutgen, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi, Rovana Plumb, Sylvie Guillaume, Vera Tax, Andreas Schieder, Andris Ameriks, Sara Cerdas, Petar Vitanov, Klára Dobrev, Attila Ara-Kovács, Maria Grapini, Dominique Riquet, Csaba Molnár, Sándor Rónai, Ismail Ertug, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Clara Aguilera, Marcos Ros Sempere, Heléne Fritzon, Victor Negrescu, Inma Rodríguez-Piñero, Alexis Georgoulis, Alfred Sant, Erik Bergkvist, Carlos Zorrinho, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, César Luena, Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Cristina Maestre Martín De Almagro, Rosa D’Amato, Evin Incir, Marc Angel, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Pedro Marques, Valter Flego, Katalin Cseh, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Seán Kelly, Ignazio Corrao, Isabel Santos, Alicia Homs Ginel, Robert Hajšel, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Javi López, Alex Agius Saliba, Demetris Papadakis, Marc Tarabella, Sergei Stanishev, Paolo De Castro, Anna Júlia Donáth, Nora Mebarek, Leszek Miller, Margarida Marques, Adriana Maldonado López, Lina Gálvez Muñoz, Eva Kaili, Juozas Olekas, Isabel Carvalhais, Hannes Heide, Márton Gyöngyösi, Estrella Durá Ferrandis, Monika Beňová, Pina Picierno, Dietmar Köster, Agnes Jongerius, Miroslav Číž, Günther Sidl, Pietro Bartolo, Ibán García Del Blanco, Jytte Guteland, Mónica Silvana González Report A9-0033/2021 Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar EU strategy for sustainable tourism (2020/2038(INI))
[Show full text]
A Look at the New European Parliament Page 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMITTEE (INTA)
THE NEW EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT KEY COMMITTEE COMPOSITION 31 JULY 2019 INTRODUCTION After several marathon sessions, the European Council agreed on the line-up for the EU “top jobs” on 2 July 2019. The deal, which notably saw German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU, EPP) surprisingly designated as the next European Commission (EC) President, meant that the European Parliament (EP) could proceed with the election of its own leadership on 3 July. The EPP and Renew Europe (formerly ALDE) groups, in line with the agreement, did not present candidates for the EP President. As such, the vote pitted the S&D’s David-Maria Sassoli (IT) against two former Spitzenkandidaten – Ska Keller (DE) of the Greens and Jan Zahradil (CZ) of the ACRE/ECR, alongside placeholder candidate Sira Rego (ES) of GUE. Sassoli was elected President for the first half of the 2019 – 2024 mandate, while the EPP (presumably EPP Spitzenkandidat Manfred Weber) would take the reins from January 2022. The vote was largely seen as a formality and a demonstration of the three largest Groups’ capacity to govern. However, Zahradil received almost 100 votes (more than the total votes of the ECR group), and Keller received almost twice as many votes as there are Greens/EFA MEPs. This forced a second round in which Sassoli was narrowly elected with just 11 more than the necessary simple majority. Close to 12% of MEPs did not cast a ballot. MEPs also elected 14 Vice-Presidents (VPs): Mairead McGuinness (EPP, IE), Pedro Silva Pereira (S&D, PT), Rainer Wieland (EPP, DE), Katarina Barley (S&D, DE), Othmar Karas (EPP, AT), Ewa Kopacz (EPP, PL), Klara Dobrev (S&D, HU), Dita Charanzová (RE, CZ), Nicola Beer (RE, DE), Lívia Járóka (EPP, HU) and Heidi Hautala (Greens/EFA, FI) were elected in the first ballot, while Marcel Kolaja (Greens/EFA, CZ), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL, EL) and Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI, IT) needed the second round.
[Show full text]
Priority Question for Written Answer
Priority question for written answer P-003917/2020 to the Commission Rule 138 Dan Nica (S&D), Carmen Avram (S&D), Rovana Plumb (S&D), Victor Negrescu (S&D), Mihai Tudose (S&D), Adrian-Dragoş Benea (S&D), Claudiu Manda (S&D), Maria Grapini (S&D), Tudor Ciuhodaru (S&D) Subject: The precarious situation of intra-EU labour mobility and the sanitary crisis in the North Rhine-Westphalia slaughterhouse EU intra-mobility is one of the key features of the European project and the single market, enhancing economic and social growth. During COVID-19, intra-EU migrant and seasonal workers proved to be essential for the agro-food chain. However, it was once again made clear that they work in precarious conditions which exposed them to even more health risks and labour abuse. The recent situation in the slaughterhouse in Germany, where more than 1 500 employees have so far been contaminated with COVID-19, and whose workers come from Romania, Bulgaria and Poland, shows that we are facing a social emergency in Europe. The Commission is the guardian of the application of Union law and should play an active role in ensuring the respect of EU working standards and decent working and living conditions for all its citizens. 1. What steps has the Commission taken to ensure that workers’ rights and European legislation are respected in relation to intra-EU mobilty and seasonal workers in the agri‑food sector? 2. Has it planned any measures at EU level to strengthen and enforce more stringently workers’ rights, their representation, labour inspections, equal rights and safety measures at the work place? 3.
[Show full text]
European Parliament's Civil Liberties
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2004 2009 Session document A6-0077/2009 19.2.2009 ***I REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (recast) (COM(2008)0229 – C6-0184/2008 – 2008/0090(COD)) Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Rapporteur: Michael Cashman Rapporteur (*): Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Committee on Constitutional Affairs (*) Associated committee - Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure (Recast - Rule 80a of the Rules of Procedue) RR\415164EN.doc PE415.164v03-00 EN EN PR_COD_recasting am Symbols for procedures * Consultation procedure majority of the votes cast **I Cooperation procedure (first reading) majority of the votes cast **II Cooperation procedure (second reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position majority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amend the common position *** Assent procedure majority of Parliament’s component Members except in cases covered by Articles 105, 107, 161 and 300 of the EC Treaty and Article 7 of the EU Treaty ***I Codecision procedure (first reading) majority of the votes cast ***II Codecision procedure (second reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position majority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amend the common position ***III Codecision procedure (third reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the joint text (The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the Commission.) Amendments to a legislative text In amendments by Parliament, amended text is highlighted in bold italics. In the case of amending acts, passages in an existing provision that the Commission has left unchanged, but that Parliament wishes to amend, are highlighted in bold.
[Show full text]
Schulz on His Meetings with Chrystia Freeland and Paul Magnette
European Parliament President Martin Schulz Schulz on his meetings with Chrystia Freeland and Paul Magnette Press Release Internal Policies and EU Institutions Brussels 22-10-2016 “I had two separate very constructive and fruitful meetings this morning in the European Parliament with Chrystia Freeland, the federal Minister of International Trade of Canada and with Paul Magnette, the Minister-President of Wallonia on the issue of CETA These meetings give me much reason for optimism about the positive conclusion of CETA as soon as possible. During my Martin Schulz © European Union 2014 - European meeting with Minister Freeland, it was clear Parliament. (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs that the negotiations between Canada and the Creative Commons license) EU are now closed and that Canada remains absolutely keen to sign CETA at the earliest possible date. The few remaining issues which stand in the way of the adoption of CETA are for us Europeans to solve. My meeting with Minister-President Magnette, to which the Commission’s services were also associated - and for whose support I am grateful, confirmed that none of the stumbling blocks on the way of CETA’s adoption by Belgium are insurmountable. The contrary is true: this morning’s meeting already set out the next steps needed to give further clarity and legal certainty to meet the concerns raised by the Walloon Parliament and which are shared by many citizens in Europe. I am convinced that, by fully addressing the last remaining concerns, we can turn the apparent European division on CETA of the last weeks into a victory for every participant to the agreement.” For further information: [email protected] Giacomo Fassina Spokesman +32 498 98 33 10 Schulz on his meetings with Chrystia Freeland and Paul Magnette 1/1.
[Show full text]
The European Convention: Bargaining in the Shadow of Rhetoric
Published in: West European Politics, April 2004 The European Convention: Bargaining in the shadow of Rhetoric PAUL MAGNETTE and KALYPSO NICOLAÏDIS The European Convention on the Future of Europe was initially presented as a turning point in the history of European integration. This paper argues that, although its composition was broader, its process more transparent and its rules more flexible than classic intergovernmental conferences, the Convention was not Europe’s Philadelphia. Since it took place under the shadow of the IGC and under a leadership especially sensitive to the positions of big member states, the Convention reproduced by enlarge the logic of intergovernmental bargains. Nevertheless, some of the Convention’s outcome – the most formal aspects of its draft treaty with less predictable distributional consequences– can be explained by the ‘social norm’ of constitutional deliberation conveyed by its president and supported by a majority of its members. The advent of constitutional politics, while consistent with prior political dynamics, is thus renewing the language of national interest convergence in the European Union. A constitutional Convention does not come every day in the history of a polity. When in December 2001 at Laeken, the Heads of state and government of the European Union (EU) agreed on the creation of a ‘Convention’ with a broad and open mandate to prepare the next reform of the treaties, many claimed that this would be remembered as a turning point in the history of European integration1. While no-one knew for sure what the outcome of this process would be called, enthusiasts already saw the dawn of a ‘Constitutional moment’ for Europe.
[Show full text]
Revista Presei 13.10.2017
REVISTA PRESEI 13.10.2017 Dragnea: Shhaideh și Plumb și-au menținut decizia de a demisiona. Și Răzvan Cuc a demisionat; sunt lucruri pe care le-a făcut, dar nu le-a comunicat Sevil Shhaideh despre demisie: Mi-am păstrat decizia pe care am luat-o de miercuri Dragnea anunță pentru vineri o nouă reuniune a CExN al PSD Dragnea despre Tudose: Este un premier bun, un premier eficient, cu greșelile lui Tudose: Sper că Sevil Shhaideh va accepta să lucreze în aparatul guvernamental Tudose: Nu a fost un război, nu e un câștigător; câștigători să fie partidul și țara Răzvan Cuc despre demisia din funcție: Am luat decizia, mi-am menținut-o și în CExN al PSD MCPDS: Societatea civilă este invitată să se înscrie în Comitetul Național OGP Negrescu spune că punctul de vedere al României despre Brexit va fi exprimat doar în Consiliul European Comisarul european Thyssen: În privința detașărilor de lucrători în țările UE e foarte important să fie asigurată libertatea serviciilor Iohannis: Dacă și acest guvern ar cădea, ar trebui să-mi pun întrebarea dacă PSD are capacitatea să guverneze Iohannis: Infrastructura de transport trebuie să fie prioritatea zero a oricărui Guvern; am primit promisiunile necesare CE: Fermierii din România primesc sprijin pentru combaterea problemelor climatice Iancu: Un producător de electricitate a închis o parte din capacitate pentru a crea o criză și a crește prețul Comisia Europeană: Statele membre pot impune în anumite condiții restricții la vânzarea terenurilor agricole Havrileț (ANRE): Comisia Europeană nu este de acord ca
[Show full text]