DOCSLIB.ORG

Title 9 Criminal Division Chapters 101 To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Title 9 Criminal Division Chapters 101 To UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS' MANUAL DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR CHAPTER 101 9-101. 000 THE COMPREHENSIVE DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION AND CONTROL ACT OF 1970-II .................................................................... 1 9-101.100 PROCEDURES RELATING TO EXPUNGEMENT OF CRIMINAL REC- ORDS PURSUANT TO 21 U.S.C. § 844(b) ................................ 1 9-101.200 REFERRAL OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE CASES TO STATE OR LOCAL PROSECUTORS ........................................................ 1 9-101. 300 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE DESTRUCTION PROCEDURES ..................... 2 9-101.400 DOMESTIC OPERATION GUIDELINES FOR THE DRUG ENFORCE- MENT ADMINISTRATION: COMMENTS ON SELECTED PROVISIONS ....................................1988 4 MANUAL ATTORNEYS S. U. July 1, 1992 (1) 1988 CHAP. 101 UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS' MANUAL 9-101.200 9-101.000 THE COMPREHENSIVE DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION AND CONTROL ACT OF 1970-II 9-101.100 PROCEDURES RELATING TO EXPUNGEMENT OF CRIMINAL RECORDS PURSUANT TO 21 U.S.C. § 844(b) Section 844 (b) of Title 21 permits the court to sentence certain first- time drug offenders to a probationary term without a formal adjudication of guil t. Upon the successful completion of the probationary term, the court must discharge all proceedings against the offender and dismiss the ac- tion. If the discharged offender was under 21 years of age at the time of the offense, the offender may ask the court for an order expunging all official records of the case, with the exception of a nonpublic record designed to prevent an offender's disposition under 21 U.S.C. § 844(b)1988 more than once. Please refer to DOJ Order 2710, and Forms OBD-160 and DOJ-329. 9-101. 200 REFERRAL OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE CASES TO STATE OR LOCAL PROSE- CUTORS The following factors should be considered in deciding whether con- trolled substance cases should be charged in federal court or referred to state or local prosecutors for action: (1) sufficiency of the evidence: (2) degree of federal involvement: (3) effectivenessMANUAL of state and local prosecutors: (4) willingness of state or local authorities to prosecute cases investigated primarily by federal agents: (5) amount of controlled substances involved: (6) violator's background: (7) possibility that prosecution will lead to disclosure of violations committed by other per- sons: and (8) the district court's backlog of cases. A. Declination of federal prosecution on evidentiary grounds is under- standable and justified. However, absent unusual circumstances, declina- tion should not be based solely on any of the other factors. The amount involved is only one of several factors which should be considered before deciding whether to prosecute in federal court. In considering the amount involved attention should be paid to the purity of the controlled substance and the method of packaging. B. When a U.S. Attorney declines to prosecute a controlled substance case and thereafterATTORNEYS a state or local prosecutor also declines prosecution, the Drug Enforcement Administration should be afforded an opportunity to request federalS. prosecutive consideration and such cases should be accept- ed unless it is not in the public interest to do so. Federal prosecution might not be warranted, for example, where the violator qualifies for processingU. under a deferred prosecution plan. C. In appraising the effectiveness of nonfederal authorities, consid- eration should be given to the professional competence of local and state prosecutors and the length of time it takes to try a case in local and state July 1, 1992 1 . S. ATTORNEYS L 9-101.200 TITLE 9-CRIMINAL DIVISION CHAP. 101 courts. Consideration should also be given to the penalties provided by local or state law, the sentencing practices of local and state judges and the applicable parole eligibility standards of nonfederal jurisdictions. D. In assessing the background of a violator, consideration should be given to the offender's age, degree of culpability, and prior criminal record. The prosecutor should also consider whether significant mitigat- ing circumstances exist, whether the offender has cooperated with the government, and whether the offender is dependent on drugs. For example, if an offender is young, has no previous record, is a narcotic addict, and was arrested for possession for the offender's personal use, it may be appropriate to defer prosecution conditioned upon the offender's enroll- ment in a drug treatment program. 1988 E. Serious consideration should always be given to the question of whether an offender would, if federally charged, cooperate and furnish evidence of narcotic violations committed by the offender's confederates or by others. F. U. S. Attorneys are urged to cooperate fully with stat.e and local prosecutors and investigators and to encourage them in actively combating drug trafficking. There will be instances where state or local prosecution of controlled substance offenders would be warranted even when there has been significant federal involvement in MANUALthe case. However, since the federal government has significant responsibilities in the area of drug law enforcement, care should be taken in deciding which is the most appro- priate judicial forum in which to prosecute a controlled sUbstance case. G. U.S. Attorneys should confer with special agents in charge of DEA field offices in their districts regarding standards and procedures to be utilized in determining whether controlled substance cases should be pros- ecuted federally or referred to state or local prosecutors. H. Periodically, U.S. Attorneys should meet or confer with state and local prosecutors in connection with referral of federal cases for prose- cution. 9-101.300 CONTROLLEDATTORNEYS SUBSTANCE DESTRUCTION PROCEDURES Each United States Attorney's Office should designate a drug evidence destruction coordinator. This coordinator should preferably be an attor- ney familiarS. with the prosecution of narcotics cases and related eviden- tiary issues. The coordinator will work closely with DEA and FBI counter- parts to ensure that the evidentiary value of the drug evidence is pre- U.served for later use in court. In addition, the coordinator will be responsible for monitoring legal problems, providing advice, and ensuring that the FBI and DEA 60-day notices are forwarded to the appropriate attorney. July 1, 1992 2 MANUA CHAP. 101 UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS' MANUAL 9-101. 300 When the United States Attorneys' Offices receive the 60-day Notice, it should be forwarded to the attorney assigned to the case (and to the Drug Evidence Destruction Coordinator) to determine the appropriate response. The prosecutor may want to contact the DEA/FBI agent in charge of the case to get the agent's assurance that sufficient photographic documentation of the evidence is or will be available prior to destruction. Furthermore, if the evidence is marijuana, the prosecutor is encouraged to consult with the case agent to make sure that the evidence was accurately weighed and the weighing method was adequately documented for use in court proceedings. Once the appropriate reviews and consultations are complete, the prosecu- tor may take one of the following actions: 1. Send a written response to the case agent before the 60-day time period elapses permitting sampling and destruction to proceed.1988 [NOTE: The Department encourages prosecutors to do this as soon as possible for cases where there is no basis for an exception request. This will permit DEA/FBI to begin the sampling and destruction process in less than 60 days, providing laboratory analyses are completed.]; or. 2. Permit the 60-day time period to elapse, at which point the DEA/FBI case agent will authorize sampling and destruction with no further notice to the United States Attorneys' Offices once laboratory anal- yses are completed; or. MANUAL 3. Determine that an exception request is warranted, and forward such a written request, signed personally by the U.S. Attorney, to the DEA/FBI SAC. It must be received before the expiration date of the 60-day time period. [NOTE: The use of exception requests should be severely limited. In any case in which the U.S. Attorney requests an exception from the SAC, the burden will be on the prosecutor to show the particular circumstances or factors that would adversely affect the government's case. Since the sample retained under the standard procedure will be large--twice the amount required for maximum man- datory minimum penal ties under the Anti-Drug Abuse Act for all substances other than marijuana--prosecutors are strongly discour- aged from filing an exception request on the grounds that the full seizure is needed for jury appeal or other purely strategical pur- poses. ATTORNEYS If the SAC denies the exception request, the U.S. Attorney will be so notified in writing. The U.S. Attorney may then choose to abide by the SAC's decisionS. or may appeal the decision to the Assistant Attorney Gener- al, Criminal Division, as discussed below. In the event that the DEA/FBI SAC denies the U.S. Attorney's request to preserve the evidence, the exhibitU. will be retained for 30 days from the day of the denial notice before sampling and destruction are authorized. If an appeal is made, the evidence will be maintained intact until the appeal is decided, provided July 1, 1992 3 U. S. ATTORNEYS MANUAL 1988 9-101. 300 TITLE 9-CRIMINAL DIVISION CHAP. 101 that the DEA/FBI SAC is notified of the appeal wi thin 30 days of the denial notice. It shall be the U.S. Attorney's responsibility to provide the DEA/FBI SAC with a copy of the appeal letter. United States Attorney's Office Action If the DEA/FBI SAC denies the exception request, the U.S. Attorney may either let the decision stand or may choose to appeal the decision to the Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division. Should the U.S. Attorney choose to appeal, a letter documenting the reasons for the appeal should be sent to: Chief, Narcotic and Dangerous Drug Section Criminal Division U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DOCUMENT RESUME CG 018 157 Federal Drug Law Enforcement and Interdiction. Hearing Before the Select Committee on Narcotics Abuse
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 255 825 CG 018 157 TITLE Federal Drug Law Enforcement and Interdiction. Hearing before the Select Committee on Narcotics Abuse and Control. House of Representatives, Ninety-Eighth Congress, Second Session, May 22, 1984. INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, DC. House Select Committee on Narcotics Abuse and Control. REPORT NO SCNAC-98-2-4 PU., DATE 85 NOTE 211p.; Portions of document may be illegible because of small print. PUB TYPE Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials (090) EDRS PRICE MF01 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS *Agency Cooperation; Cooperative Planning; *Crime; *Drug Abuse; Drug Legislation; *Federal Aid; Federal Programs; Government Role; Hearings; Illegal Drug Use; *Law Enforcement; *Narcotics; Shared Services IDENTIFIERS Congress 98th; *Drug Trafficking ABSTRACT This document contains testimony and prepared statements from the Congressional hearing on federal drug law enforcement. Statements are given from Congressman Claude Pepper, the staff director of the National Narcotics Border Interdiction System (NNBIS), an administrator from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), a commissioner from the United States Customs Service, an assistant director of the Criminal Investigative Division of the FBI, and a Vice Commandant of the United States Coast Guard. Congressman Pepper's testimony is focused on the problems of marine trafficking and other illegal entry of drugs into this country through Florida. The operation and effectiveness of the nation's narcotics enforcement and interdiction efforts are reviewed, and cooperative efforts between agencies, task force operations, and agency use of manpower and resources are discussed. Concern is expressed by Committee members about the broad-based, fragmented approach to narcotics enforcement and the continued introduction of different approaches, task forces, and agencies that are pooling their manpower.
    [Show full text]
  • "Money Laundering," Remarks by Dick Thornburgh, Attorney General Of
    ~epa:dmetti of 3}usiite REMARKS BY DICK THORNBURGH A'rI'ORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES BEFORE THE CITY CLUB FORUM LUNCHEON CLEVELAND, OHIO FRIDAY, MAY 11, 1990 Let me present you with a cash problem. The annual gross income from drug sales in this country is estimated at over $100 billion. On the street, a crack sale is done for five or ten dollars, so that the largest denomination of currency in street circulation is usually a twenty-dollar bill. Those twenties are crumpled, so covered with a film of grime that they sometimes jam the drug-dealer's counting machines. They are usually bundled in such ways that, if seized, they can be put directly into evidence at trials as displaying all the characteristics of a drug deal. Enough of these bundles, collected from all the street dealers, ultimately total the over $100 billion I've mentioned. Together, they would weigh 26 million pounds. Here is the problem: how do you push 26 million pounds of these twenties through a bank window? An even tougher problem: how do you shove over $100 billion in twenties through a bank window without attracting attention? That, in a nutshell, is what I would describe as the drug dealers' greatest dilemma. The laundering of these billions is far more crucial to their operations -- and much more difficult, and high-risk -- than the actual trafficking in drugs. Consider the plight of Stephen Kalish, convicted drug­ dealer and money launderer. In 1983, Kalish found himself overwhelmed by his cash profits, and expecting $300 million more still in the pipe line.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Money-Laundering
    Transnational Criminal Organizations, Cybercrime, and Money Laundering A Handbook for Law Enforcement Officers, Auditors, and Financial Investigators James R. Richards CRC PRESS Boca Raton London New York Washington, D.C. Acquiring Editor: Harvey Kane Project Editor: Sylvia Wood Marketing Manager Becky McEldowney Cover design: Dawn Boyd Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Richards, James R., 1960– Transnational criminal organizations, cybercrime & money laundering : a handbook for law enforcement officers, auditors, and financial investigators / James R. Richards p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8493-2806-3 (alk. paper) 1. Money laundering. 2. Money laundering investigation. 3. Organized crime. 4. Computer crimes. 5. Transnational crime. I. Title. HV6768.R53 1998 364.16′8—DC21 98-8240 CIP This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reprinted material is quoted with permission, and sources are indicated. A wide variety of references are listed. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and the publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or for the consequences of their use. Neither this book nor any part may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. The consent of CRC Press LLC does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for resale. Specific permission must be obtained in writing from CRC Press LLC for such copying. Direct all inquiries to CRC Press LLC, 2000 Corporate Blvd., N.W., Boca Raton, Florida 33431.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Money Laundering Strategy for 1999
    THE NATIONAL MONEY LAUNDERING STRATEGY FOR 1999 September 1999 Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................1 Background...............................................................................................................................9 Goal 1: Strengthening Domestic Enforcement To Disrupt the Flow of Illicit Money .........17 Concentrate Resources in High-Risk Areas....................................................................17 Propose Counter-Money Laundering Legislation to Address Domestic Money Laundering Concerns..............................................................21 Identify and Target Major Money Laundering Systems..................................................21 Target Major Domestic and International Money Launderers .......................................24 Enhance Inter-agency Coordination of Money Laundering Investigations.....................25 Enhance the Collection, Analysis, and Sharing of Information to Target Money Launderers .............................................................................................28 Enhance and Support Efforts to Detect and Counter Currency Smuggling.....................30 Intensify Training..........................................................................................................31 Goal 2: Enhancing Regulatory and Cooperative Public-Private Efforts to Prevent Money Laundering ..........................................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • Money Laundering in Brazil and in the United States
    Money Laundering In Brazil and in the United States Rosemeire Kiyoko Matsuda [email protected] Minerva Program, Fall 2007 Advisor: William C. Handorf, Phd. 1 I – Introduction 1 II – Money Laundering 2 A – Definitions and Explanation B – The process C – The size of the money laundering problem D - Banking Privacy III – International Standard Setters 9 A - The United Nations B - The Financial Action Task Force On Money Laundering - FATF C – Bank for International Settlements (BIS) D – International Monetary Fund and World Bank F- The Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units IV – Anti-money laundering efforts in the U.S. Banking System 19 A) Alcapone G) Money Laundering Law B) Meyer Lansky H) Operation Polar Cap C) Bank Secrecy Act I) Annunzio-Wylie Law D) Operation Greenback J) Prevention of Terrorism E) Operation Smurfing K) USA Patriotic Act F) Bank of Boston L) Ten Commandments V – O Brasil no combate a lavagem de dinheiro 28 A – The Brazilian President enacted the Vienna Convention - 1997 B – Law 9.613 of 03.03.1998 and COAF Establishment – 1998 C) COAF becomes a member of the Egmont Group – 1999 D) Brazil was accepted as an FATF member – 2000 E) Drug Trafficking CPI (legislative Investigation Committee) – 2000 F) Complementary Law 105 (Banking Privacy Law) – 2001 G) Committee – Administrative Rule 98 – 2002 H) ENCLA – National Strategy Anti-Money Laundering – 2003 I ) GGI-LD – Managing Department of Integrated Prevention and Fight against Money Laundering J) International Acknowledgement VI – Conclusion 38 References 41 2 I – INTRODUCTION The rationale for this survey is the enhancement of the content of money that reaches the “business” involving money laundering in most countries currently.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of a Potent Weapon in the Drug War, 21 U
    University of Miami Law School Institutional Repository University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 7-1-1990 Tracking Narco-Dollars: The volutE ion of a Potent Weapon in the Drug War Patrick T. O'Brien Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.law.miami.edu/umialr Recommended Citation Patrick T. O'Brien, Tracking Narco-Dollars: The Evolution of a Potent Weapon in the Drug War, 21 U. Miami Inter-Am. L. Rev. 637 (1990) Available at: http://repository.law.miami.edu/umialr/vol21/iss3/6 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Inter- American Law Review by an authorized administrator of Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 637 TRACKING NARCO-DOLLARS: THE EVOLUTION OF A POTENT WEAPON IN THE DRUG WAR I. INTRODUCTION .............................. ........................ 638 II. ENACTMENT OF THE BANK SECRECY ACT ................................. 640 A. Legislative Background .......................................... 640 B. Regulations Under the Bank Secrecy Act ......................... 641 C. Early Enforcement Efforts ....................................... 642 1. Administrative Problems .................................... 643 2. IRS Problem s .............................................. 644 3. Custom s Problem s ........................................... 646 D. Initial Successes ................. .. ........................ 649 III. EMERGENCE OF THE BSA AS A MAJOR WEAPON IN
    [Show full text]
  • Bank Secrecy Act Amendments (3) Box: 1
    Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Barr, William: Files Folder Title: Bank Secrecy Act Amendments (3) Box: 1 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20220 DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY MAY 191982 MEMORANDUM FOR: Bill Barr Deputy Assistant Director Office of Poli~ment FROM: Robert E. Powi ~ Deputy Assistant Secretary (Enforcement) SUBJECT: Warrantless Search Authority for Monetary Instruments (LaFalce Bill) Pursuant to our telephone conversations last week on the above captioned subject, I am forwarding a copy of a memorandum written to me by the Assistant Commissioner, Office of Border Operations, U.S. Customs Service, which I believe makes a good case for Customs' need in this area. In addition to the information contained in the Customs paper I think it is worth mentioning that almost every day Customs personnel arrest and seize people who are bringing small quantities of drugs into the country. Typically, on May 16, 1982, one defendant was arrested at Miami Airport with 2.14 lbs. of cocaine concealed on her body. Another defendant was arrested the same day with 3.99 lbs. of cocaine concealed in the sides of a brief case. In these cases and in similar cases the "mules" probably leave the country with a quantity of cash sufficient to make the pur­ chase.
    [Show full text]
  • Drugs (4) Box: CFOA 1315
    Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Brady, Phillip D.: Files Folder Title: Drugs (4) Box: CFOA 1315 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ I l DRAFT CHAPTER VI: PROSECUTION INTRODUCTION The objective of the Federal Prosecution strategy is to immobilize drug trafficking and money laundering organizations by incarcerating their members, forfeiting their assets, divesting them of their power, and, as appropriate, extraditing, deporting, and excluding their members. To accomplish this objective, prosecution resources are directed at those significant national and international targets where successful prosecution has the greatest impact on the overall strategic objective. The strategy, therefore, focuses on a variety of interrelated activities including, but not limited to, the following: o Extending efforts to reduce the supply of illegal drugs by increased, pro-active targeting of the major traffickers responsible for drug importation and distribution. o Attacking significant local and regional drug threats by maintaining a Federal enforcement presence in every district. o Continuing to work with State and local drug enforcement authorities and expand efforts to assist them in drug prosecution at the State and local levels. o Extending efforts to interrelate Federal, State, and local prosecutions with Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) administrative proceedings to deport convicted alien ' drug traffickers and prevent their reentry to the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • The Year Money-Laundering Made the Headlines—And Nothing Was
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 13, Number 1, January 3, 1986 The year money-laundering made the headlines�and nothing was done The following listing strongly indicates whatEIR document­ businessmen, amongst whom appear some ex-presidents." ed over the course of 1985; that the American banking sys­ Feb. 28: Cowen & Co. SEC investigating for possible tem, from top to bottom, as presently organized and under violations of securities laws. presenteconomic policies, is a criminal enterprise. The real­ March 11: United Mizrahi Bank and Trust Co., North ity of the U. S. banking system's dependence on dirty money American Bank, Ltd. Court of Appeals reverses lower court for a critical margin of its remainingliquidity is undoubtedly ruling that dismissed charges.against three former bank offi­ associated with the remarkably mild penalties passed down cers, indicted after a federal undercover agent asked them to by theU.S . Justice Departmentin its so-called on"war drugs," secretly move $3 million out of the country. exemplified by the mere $500,OOOfine levied against a Bank March 19: Irving Trust Co., Chemical Bank. Ac­ of Boston convicted of laundering $1. 2 billion. A serious counts totaling over $30 million frozen, funds apparently ' prosecution of the war on drugs, entailing a crackdown on related to narcotics offenses; Chemical will be fined $210,000' money-laundering, would have to be followed up by thor­ for 857 unreported transactions totaling $26 million. ough banking reform and re-regulation of a system thereby March 25: First City National Bank ofEI Paso. DEA­ rendered bankrupt. It is to be believed, therefore, that the led investigation shows bank handling money fOf top "drug administration has pulled back from a serious war on drugs/ kingpins" from Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Trafficking a Report to the President of the United States August 3, 1989
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. u.s .. Department of Justice Office of the Attorney General Drug Trafficking A Report to The President of the United States August 3, 1989 119844 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated In this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this i ~ SIi"" material has been granted b¥ ., PUblic Domaln/Offlce of the ~~~~nera1/US Dep-t. of to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ sion of the~ owner. Compiled by: The United States Attorneys and The Attorney General of the United States • ----------------~---------- ~fnte nft4p l\Unmpl1 052utral Dhtll~ingtnn, 1!l. Q1. 2053U August 3, 1989 The President The White House Washington, D.C. 20500 Dear Mr. President: Recognizing that drug trafficking is the number one crime problem facing our country and the world, I asked our 9~ united states Attorneys last fall to prepare detailed reports analyzing the business structure of drug trafficking in their districts. They were requested to use all tools available to describe how these illicit enterprises operate -- not only how the kingpins employ drug producers and shippers, but how they have turned legitimate businesses such as accounting, banking, financing, and communications to use of their nefarious activities v I' am herewith transmitting to you and to Director Bennett the results of this e,ffort.
    [Show full text]
  • Money Laundering PRESIDENT's COMMISSION on ORGANIZED CRIME
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file, please contact us at NCJRS.gov. t3s Commission 0n, Organized Crirrime . , ,, , ? Interim Report to the President . ..and. the... Attorney General I I . ,=/- THE CASH CONNECTION: Organized C r~me, Financial Instigations, and Money_-'I~aL~dermg_ - " • " " .y >7." • , ., / : • , .! • '. " ' . A'" " • October ~'19:~ President's Commission on Organized Crime II Interim Report to the President and the Attorney General THE CASH CONNECTION: Organized Crime, Financial Institutions, and Money Laundering PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION ON ORGANIZED CRIME HONORABLE IRVING R. KAUFMAN, CHAIRMAN Jesse A. Brewer, Jr. Manuel J. Reyes Carol Corrigan Honorable Peter W. Rodino, Jr.* Justin J. Dintino Charles H. Rogovin William J. Guste Barbara A. Rowan Judith R. Hope Frances A. Sclafani Philip R. Manuel Samuel K. Skinner Thomas F. McBride Honorable Potter Stewart Eugene H. Methvin Honorable Strom Thurmond Edwin L. Miller Phyllis T. Wunsche James D. Harmon, Jr. Executive Director and Chief Counsel * Commissioner Rodino, in view of his position as Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary of the United States House of Representatives, takes no position concerning the recommenda- tions included in Part III of this Report. .PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION ON ORGANIZED CREVIE suite 700 Suite 2-122 1425 K Street, NW 26 Federal Plaza Washington, D.C. 20005 New York, N.Y. 10278 202-786-3500 212-264-3400 Chairman: Commlulonorl: Honorable Irving R. Klutmln Jesse A. Brewer, Jr. Carol Corr 19an Executive Olrector ana Justin J. C)lntlno Chief Coun$111: William J. Gusto, Jr. James O. Hirmon, Jr. JU01th R. Hol~e PnlllO R. Manuel ThOmal F.
    [Show full text]