The Crime of Incest

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Crime of Incest Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 55 Article 2 Issue 3 September Fall 1964 The rC ime of Incest Graham Hughes Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Graham Hughes, The rC ime of Incest, 55 J. Crim. L. Criminology & Police Sci. 322 (1964) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. THE CRIME OF INCEST GRAHAM HUGHES Professor Hughes is Senior Lecturer in Law in the University College of Wales, Aberystwyth. He is presently Visiting Professor of Law (1964-1965) in New York University, and for 1963-1964 he was Visiting Professor of Law in Stanford University. Professor Hughes studied law at the University of Cambridge, where he received the B.A. degree in 1948 and the M.A. degree in 1951. He also received the LL.B. degree from the University of Wales in 1950 and the LL.M. degree from New York Uni- versity in 1960. The author has taught law in Britain, at the University of Wales and the University of Hull, and in the United States, at Yale University as well as New York University and Stanford University. How do the laws of England, the United States, and other countries compare in their treatment of the crime of incest? How serious is the incidence of the crime? How can the genesis of the incest taboo be explained? What are the real harms produced by the crime? And, can the existing prohibi- tions regarding incest be defended on utilitarian grounds? Considering these and related questions, Professor Hughes critically analyses the existing law and proposes a "Model Incest Prohibition" designed to encompass the socially harmful aspects of incest without also comprising those relation- ships with which he finds the criminal law should not be concerned.-EDrrox. In jurisprudential writing in the last few years to have sexual intercourse with a woman whom he there has been a continuing debate over the knows to be his granddaughter, daughter, sister, or relationship between morality and the criminal mother. The section stipulates that the relationship law.' One of the topics that has come to be discus- need not be through lawful wedlock and that sister sed is whether some of the existing prohibitions of shall include half-sister. It may be noted that there the criminal law can be defended on utilitarian is no mention of the unce-niece relationship nor grounds or whether they reflect only deep feelings of the stepfather and stepdaughter relationship. in society of repugnancy which may not be capable Under section 11 it is an offense for a woman, if of utilitarian justification. A criminal offense often over the age of 16, to permit a man in the group of mentioned in this connection is that of incest, and relationships previously listed in section 10 to have it may therefore be worthwhile to examine the sexual intercourse with her by her consent. A existing law of incest as a crime in the light of in- curious feature of this definition is that no offense of formed opinion on the effects of incest behavior as incest occurs as between grandson and grand- expressed in the writings of sociologists, anthro- mother, though it does between grandfather and pologists, psychologists, and psychiatrists. granddaughter. Under section 38 of the statute, if a man is convicted of incest with a girl under the THE STATE OF ='r LAW age of 21 (or of an attempt to commit the offense), All common-law jurisdictions contain criminal the court may divest him of all authority over her. prohibitions of incestuous intercourse. In England Under this English statute a prosecution for the offense was originally in the jurisdiction of the incest can be commenced only by the Director of ecclesiastical courts and so has no history at com- Public Prosecutions or with the sanction of the mon law. It was given a statutory form in the Attorney General. Neither incest nor attempted Punishment of Incest Act, 1908, and is now to be incest is triable at Quarter Sessions but must be found in the consolidating enactment, the Sexual sent to the High Court. The maximum sentence for Offences Act, 1956.2 Section 10 of this statute incest is generally seven years, but is life imprison- provides that it shall be a misdemeanor for a man ment in the case of incest with a girl under 13. The general maximum I DvL , Tim Eir-oacxmENr or MoRAss (1959); punishment for attempted incest Rostow, The Enforcement of Morals, 1960 CAmm. L.J. is two years, but if the girl is under 13. the maxi- 174; Hughes, Morals and the Criminal Law, 71 YALE mum for attempt has been raised to seven years L.J. 662 (1962); HART, LAW, LIBERTY AND MORALITY 3 (1963). by the Indecency with Children Act of 1960. 2 4 & 5 Eliz. 2, c. 69. 3 8 & 9 Eliz. 2, c. 33. 1964] THE CRIME OF INCEST In the United States incest is always a statutory In some states intermarriage is a sufficient actus offense.4 Sharing the English background of the reus to constitute the crime of incest without punishment for incest being originally entrusted to necessity for proof of actual sexual intercourse 4 ecclesiastical authorities, the crime never existed (e.g., California).1 Apart from this possibility, at common law in the United States and was proof of actual sexual intercourse (i.e., penetration created by statute at varying times in the different though not necessarily emission) is required, and states. In Utah, where the Mormon community did proof of lesser acts of sexual gratification is not 5 not disapprove of incestuous relationships, incest sufficient.' Again, in some states proof of mutual did not become a criminal offense until a statute of assent is required to constitute incest, so that 1892. 5 incest and rape are by definition mutually exclusive 6 The concept of incest as a crime in United States (e.g., Missouri).' Other jurisdictions follow the jurisdictions is generally much wider than in English rule that the consent of the female is not England. All the states add the grandmother- necessary and that incest and rape may overlap grandson and the uncle-niece and aunt-nephew (e.g., Illinois)." Under most statutes knowledge of categories to the list of relationships as found in the relationship on the part of the accused is an 8 England, and almost half the states include first essential element of the offense, but in some states cousins within the sphere of the crime.6 (In Eng- knowledge is not necessary and incest thus becomes 9 land marriage between first cousins is legal and in a crime of strict liability (e.g. Florida). practice quite frequent.) In some states, although In all states incest is a felony or, at the least, a marriage between first cousins is prohibited, their high misdemeanor. The position with respect to cohabitation does not amount to incest (e.g., punishment has been summarized by Weinberg: Louisiana).7 In a number of states relationship by "Though most states have one penalty for incest affinity (i.e., through marriage) is sufficient to offenders, regardless of nearness or distance of ground a prosecution for incest 8 So sexual inter- the kin, some states have two penalties. Colo- course between stepfather and stepdaughter rado, Nebraska and New Jersey impose a heavier (Georgia), 9 between stepmother and stepson sentence upon the father than upon other male (Indiana),10 and even between brother-in-law and incest offenders. In North Carolina male offend- sister-in-law (Ohio)" may amount to incest. The ers who are in the immediate family are charged relationship must exist at the time of the inter- with a felony and are liable to imprisonment for course, though in Alabama it has been held that not more than fifteen years. Male offenders in intercourse between a stepfather and stepdaughter uncle-niece and aunt-nephew relations are amounts to incest even after the death of the charged with a misdemeanor and are liable to a latter's mother.n In 1944 it was held in Mississippi far milder penalty which is subject to the discre- that an adopted child was not a daughter within tion of the court. In West Virginia, cousin mar- the meaning of the incest statute. 3 There was ap- riages are annulled but the participants are not parently no previous authority to be found on this punished. point. "In most states the male only is punished for incest but in some states both male and female 4 See MUELLER, LEGAL REGULATION OF SEXUAL two distinct statutes CoNDuCr 44 (1961); WEInuERG, INCEST BEHAVIOR 26- are punished. In Tennessee 28 (1955). pertain to male and female offenders; the woman 6 Utah Laws, ch. 7, §4 (1892). 6 Rhode Island specifically exempts Jews, who are is an accomplice if she allows the act to continue permitted to marry within the degrees allowed by their for several months. In Texas the daughter is an religion. R.I. GEN. LAWS ch. 415, §4 (1938). accomplice if she cooperates. In Oregon the fe- 'LA. Civ. CODE tit. 4, ch. 2, §95 (1932); LA. CRIM. CODE §740-78 (1943); State v. Couvillion, 42 So. 431, male must consent or the man is charged with 117 La. 935 (1906).
Recommended publications
  • Information About Incest
    INFORMATION ABOUT INCEST Incest is sexual contact between persons who are related (e.g., parents and children, uncles/aunts and nieces/nephews, etc.). This usually takes the form of an older family member sexually abusing a child or adolescent. There are very few reliable statistics about how often incest occurs. It’s difficult to know how many people are affected by incest because many incest situations never get reported. There are many reasons that the victim might not report the abuse. The victim: may have been told that what is happening is normal or happens in every family, and doesn’t realize that it is a form of abuse may not know that help is available or who they can talk to may be afraid of what will happen if they tell someone May have been threatened may care about the abuser and be afraid of what will happen to the abuser if they tell may be afraid of what will happen to them if they tell about how many people will react when they hear about the abuse that no one will believe them or that the person they confide in will tell the abuser that people will accuse them of having done something wrong What makes incest different than child sexual abuse? All forms of child sexual abuse can have negative long-term effects for the victim. Incest is especially damaging because it disrupts the child’s primary support system, the family. When a child is abused by someone outside the family, the child’s family is often able to offer support and a sense of safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Age and Sexual Consent
    Per Se or Power? Age and Sexual Consent Joseph J. Fischel* ABSTRACT: Legal theorists, liberal philosophers, and feminist scholars have written extensively on questions surrounding consent and sexual consent, with particular attention paid to the sorts of conditions that validate or vitiate consent, and to whether or not consent is an adequate metric to determine ethical and legal conduct. So too, many have written on the historical construction of childhood, and how this concept has influenced contemporary legal culture and more broadly informed civil society and its social divisions. Far less has been written, however, on a potent point of contact between these two fields: age of consent laws governing sexual activity. Partially on account of this under-theorization, such statutes are often taken for granted as reflecting rather than creating distinctions between adults and youth, between consensual competency and incapacity, and between the time for innocence and the time for sex. In this Article, I argue for relatively modest reforms to contemporary age of consent statutes but propose a theoretic reconstruction of the principles that inform them. After briefly historicizing age of consent statutes in the United States (Part I), I assert that the concept of sexual autonomy ought to govern legal regulations concerning age, age difference, and sexual activity (Part II). A commitment to sexual autonomy portends a lowered age of sexual consent, decriminalization of sex between minors, heightened legal supervision focusing on age difference and relations of dependence, more robust standards of consent for sex between minors and between minors and adults, and greater attention to the ways concerns about age, age difference, and sex both reflect and displace more normatively apt questions around gender, gendered power and submission, and queer sexuality (Part III).
    [Show full text]
  • A Note on the Incest Taboo: the Case of the Matrilineal Khasis
    IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 22, Issue 5, Ver. I (May 2017) PP 41-46 e-ISSN: 2279-0837, p-ISSN: 2279-0845. www.iosrjournals.org A Note on the Incest Taboo: The Case of the Matrilineal Khasis Davina Diengdoh Ropmay (Research Scholar, Department of Sociology, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, Meghalaya, India) Abstract : Incest Taboo serves as one important aspect under kinship studies. Understanding the rules prohibiting intimate and sexual relations with certain kin throws light on how other facets of a social organisation operate such as marriage, clan organisation and kinship terminology. The existence of the Incest Taboo among the Khasi, a major matrilineal tribal group of Meghalaya, provides us a picture on how such facets are determined. Therefore, this article attempts to describe the bounds of the incest taboo among the Khasis and the serious implication it has towards the maintenance and perpetuation of the society as a whole Keywords: Incest, Exogamy, Incest Taboo, Marriage, Khasi. I. INTRODUCTION The study of Kinship has been a much researched area in sociological and social anthropological studies. It simply seeks to understand on one hand, in what way a person is related to another, and on the other hand, in what way do these people exhibit behaviour with each other as per their relationship. Radcliffe-Brown rightly puts it “A kinship system thus presents to us a complex set of norms, of usages, of patterns of behaviour between kindred” (Radcliffe-Brown 1950: 10). Behaviour patterns which stem out of the social relations between people, customs, norms and usages are important for the functioning of the social machinery.
    [Show full text]
  • Incestuous Abuse: Its Long-Term Effects
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 390 010 CG 026 765 AUTHOR Russell, Diana E. H. TITLE Incestuous Abuse: Its Long-Term Effects. SPONS AGENCY Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria (South Africa). REPORT NO ISBN-0-7969-1651-9 PUB DATE 95 NOTE 111p. PUB TYPE Books (010) Reports Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC05 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adult Children; *Child Abuse; *Family Violence; Females; Foreign Countries; *Incidence; Interviews; Parent Child Relationship; Qualitative Research; *Sexual Abuse; *Victims of Crime; Violence IDENTIFIERS South Africa ABSTRACT Despite the growing recognition of the prevalence of incest which is challenging-traditional views about the family as a safe haven for children, there is a serious paucity of scientific research on incest in South Africa in the new field of family violence. Almost a century after Sigmund Freud dismissed most women's reports of incest victimization as wishful fantasy, the extent of the damage done by this form of abuse remains controversial in South Africa, with some researchers maintaining that incest victims often suffer no severe effects. This report presents the findings of a qualitative study designed to explore the short- and long-term effects of incestuous abuse experienced by 20 adult women ince:-.t survivors. Although all but one of the in-depth interviews were conducted with women who at the time were residing in Cape Town, the places in which the incestuous abuse had occurred are dispersed throughout South Africa. The purpose of this study is to inform policy discussions on incestuous abuse, violence in South Africa, and violence against women in general. Includes information on prevalence of incestuous abuse, study methodology, characteristics of incestuous abuse, initial effects abuse; and long-terms effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Rape: a Guide to State Laws and Reporting Requirements
    Statutory Rape: A Guide to State Laws and Reporting Requirements Prepared for: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services Prepared by: Asaph Glosser Karen Gardiner Mike Fishman December 15, 2004 Available On-line: http://www.lewin.com/Lewin_Publications/Human_Services/StateLaws Report.htm 352695 Acknowledgements Work on this project was funded by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under a contract to The Lewin Group. This report benefited greatly from the oversight and input of Jerry Silverman, the ASPE Project Officer. In addition, we would like to acknowledge the assistance of a number of reviewers. Sarah Brown, Eva Klain, and Brenda Rhodes Miller provided us with valuable guidance and insights into legal issues and the policy implications of the laws and reporting requirements. Their comments improved both the content and the organization of the paper. At The Lewin Group, Shauna Brodsky reviewed drafts and provided helpful comments. The Authors 352695 Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................ES-1 A. Background.................................................................................................................ES-1 1. Criminal Laws...................................................................................................... ES-1 2. Reporting Requirements .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Marriage Outlaws: Regulating Polygamy in America
    Faucon_jci (Do Not Delete) 1/6/2015 3:10 PM Marriage Outlaws: Regulating Polygamy in America CASEY E. FAUCON* Polygamist families in America live as outlaws on the margins of society. While the insular groups living in and around Utah are recognized by mainstream society, Muslim polygamists (including African‐American polygamists) living primarily along the East Coast are much less familiar. Despite the positive social justifications that support polygamous marriage recognition, the practice remains taboo in the eyes of the law. Second and third polygamous wives are left without any legal recognition or protection. Some legal scholars argue that states should recognize and regulate polygamous marriage, specifically by borrowing from business entity models to draft default rules that strive for equal bargaining power and contract‐based, negotiated rights. Any regulatory proposal, however, must both fashion rules that are applicable to an American legal system, and attract religious polygamists to regulation by focusing on the religious impetus and social concerns behind polygamous marriage practices. This Article sets out a substantive and procedural process to regulate religious polygamous marriages. This proposal addresses concerns about equality and also reflects the religious and as‐practiced realities of polygamy in the United States. INTRODUCTION Up to 150,000 polygamists live in the United States as outlaws on the margins of society.1 Although every state prohibits and criminalizes polygamy,2 Copyright © 2014 by Casey E. Faucon. * Casey E. Faucon is the 2013‐2015 William H. Hastie Fellow at the University of Wisconsin Law School. J.D./D.C.L., LSU Paul M. Hebert School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Rape: a Guide to State Laws and Reporting Requirements
    Statutory Rape: A Guide to State Laws and Reporting Requirements Prepared for: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services Prepared by: Asaph Glosser Karen Gardiner Mike Fishman The Lewin Group December 15, 2004 Acknowledgements Work on this project was funded by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under a contract to The Lewin Group. This report benefited greatly from the oversight and input of Jerry Silverman, the ASPE Project Officer. In addition, we would like to acknowledge the assistance of a number of reviewers. Sarah Brown, Eva Klain, and Brenda Rhodes Miller provided us with valuable guidance and insights into legal issues and the policy implications of the laws and reporting requirements. Their comments improved both the content and the organization of the paper. At The Lewin Group, Shauna Brodsky reviewed drafts and provided helpful comments. The Authors Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................ES-1 A. Background...........................................................................................................................ES-1 1. Criminal Laws............................................................................................................... ES-1 2. Reporting Requirements.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Incest Statutes
    Statutory Compilation Regarding Incest Statutes March 2013 Scope This document is a comprehensive compilation of incest statutes from U.S. state, territorial, and the federal jurisdictions. It is up-to-date as of March 2013. For further assistance, consult the National District Attorneys Association’s National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse at 703.549.9222, or via the free online prosecution assistance service http://www.ndaa.org/ta_form.php. *The statutes in this compilation are current as of March 2013. Please be advised that these statutes are subject to change in forthcoming legislation and Shepardizing is recommended. 1 National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse National District Attorneys Association Table of Contents ALABAMA .................................................................................................................................................................. 8 ALA. CODE § 13A-13-3 (2013). INCEST .................................................................................................................... 8 ALA. CODE § 30-1-3 (2013). LEGITIMACY OF ISSUE OF INCESTUOUS MARRIAGES ...................................................... 8 ALASKA ...................................................................................................................................................................... 8 ALASKA STAT. § 11.41.450 (2013). INCEST .............................................................................................................. 8 ALASKA R. EVID. RULE 505 (2013)
    [Show full text]
  • Susan Blackburn and Sharon Bessell
    M arriageable Ag e : Political Debates on Early Marriage in Twentieth- C entury Indonesia Susan Blackburn and Sharon Bessell The purpose of this article is to show how the age of marriage, especially for girls, became a political issue in twentieth century Indonesia, and to investigate the changing intensity, focus, and participation in the debate over the issue. Compared with India, the incidence of very early marriage among Indonesian girls appears never to have been exceptionally high, yet among those trying to "modernize" Indonesia the fact that parents married off their daughters at or before the onset of puberty was considered a "social evil." Social reformers differed as to the reasons for their concern and as to what action should be taken and by whom. In particular there were strong disagreements about whether government intervention was either desirable or effective in raising the age of marriage. The age at which it is appropriate for girls to marry has been a contentious matter in many countries in recent centuries. In societies where marriage was considered to be the prerogative of families, the children themselves were rarely consulted and the age of marriage, or at least of betrothal, was likely to be quite young, before children could exert their own will. Although physical readiness for sexual intercourse and child­ bearing was a consideration, this was a matter to be supervised by adult kin, and the wedding could, if necessary, be timed so that it occurred separately from the consummation of marriage. Apart from families, the only other institutions directly concerned with marriage were likely to be religious ones.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Recrimination Doctrine
    South Carolina Law Review Volume 20 Issue 5 Article 1 1968 Recrimination: An Examination of the Recrimination Doctrine Marvin M. Moore University of Akron College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/sclr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Marvin M. Moore, Recrimination: An Examination of the Recrimination Doctrine, 20 S. C. L. Rev. 685 (1968). This Article is brought to you by the Law Reviews and Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in South Carolina Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Moore: Recrimination: An Examination of the Recrimination Doctrine RECRIMINATION AN EXAMINATION OF THE RECRIMINATION DOCTRINE MARVIN M. MOORE* I. INTRODUCTION Under the doctrine of recrimination a defendant in a di- vorce action establishes a good defense by showing that the complainant is himself guilty of misconduct constituting a ground for divorce.' In other words "[I]f both parties have a right to a divorce, neither of the parties has." 2 This doc- trine is capable of producing some remarkable results, as the following three cases illustrate: Mathewson v. Mathew- son,3 Dunn v. Dunn4 and Wells v. Wells.5 The parties in the Mathewson case married in 1853 and co- habited until 1861, when respondent (husband) left petitioner and enlisted in the Union Army. Except for two letters which she received shortly after respondent left, petitioner heard nothing from or about respondent for twenty-seven years, and during this period she assumed that he was killed in the Civil War.
    [Show full text]
  • Emancipation of Minors Rights of Emancipated Minors
    Emancipation of Minors In 2005, ACAPP successfully worked with legislators and other advocacy Rights of organizations to pass House Bill 2428, which allows minors to petition the courts to emancipate. The law became effective August 12, 2005. Below is Emancipated an overview of the process: Minors Qualifications to Emancipate: An emancipated minor is 1) Be at least 16 entitled to: 2) An Arizona resident 3) Financially self-sufficient 1. Enter a contract 4) Acknowledge in writing that the petitioner has read and understands the rights and obligations of emancipation 2. Sue and be sued 5) The minor is not a ward of the court or in the state’s custody 3. Buy and sell real Cost to Emancipate: estate 1) $46 filing fee, but the court may waive the fee 4. Establish a legal Minor Must Demonstrate to the Court the Ability to: residence 1) Manage financial, personal and social affairs 5. Pay child support 2) Live wholly independent of parent or guardian 3) Obtain or maintain health care, education, training or employment 6. Incur debts Required Documentation: 7. Apply for social The minor must provide at least one (1) of the following: services 1) Documentation of the minor’s independent living for at least three consecutive months 8. Obtain a job-related 2) Statement explaining why the minor believes the home of the license parent or legal guardian is unsafe 3) A notarized statement of written consent from the parent or 9. Apply for school guardian in addition to an explanation by the parent or guardian 10. Apply for loans Court Process: 1) Minor may represent self or be represented by an attorney 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Incest Avoidance and Prohibition: Psychobiological and Cultural Factors
    Psicologia USP http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-656420160050 287 Evitação e proibição do incesto: fatores psicobiológicos e culturais Francisco Wilson Nogueira Holanda Júnior* Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia. Natal, RN, Brasil Resumo: Embora historicamente a regulação proibitiva do incesto seja considerada um fenômeno cultural quase universal que não é influenciado por fatores psicobiológicos relativos à história evolutiva da espécie humana, evidências recentes têm questionado essa visão tradicional e defendido que a evitação e a proibição do incesto são influenciadas biológica e cognitivamente com a cultura. Este artigo objetiva desenvolver uma discussão teórica acerca da inibição e proibição do incesto, enfatizando os mecanismos evolutivos subjacentes a esses fenômenos. Argumenta-se a existência de mecanismos endógenos que evoluíram porque inibem a atividade sexual entre parentes próximos e que formam a base para regular socialmente a proibição do incesto (mecanismo exógeno). Destaca-se o efeito Westermarck, no qual a proximidade de pessoas que vivem juntas desde a infância provoca uma aversão ao intercurso sexual entre elas. A ausência de propensão ao incesto e sua proibição institucional constituem uma complexa integração entre fatores psicobiológicos e culturais. Palavras-chave: incesto, evitação, proibição, evolução. Introdução por ≥50% dos casamentos consanguíneos nessas popula- ções (Zlotogora, Hujerat, Barges, Shalev, & Chakravarti, O incesto é definido como a prática de relação 2007). Os casamentos consanguíneos de segundo e ter- sexual entre pessoas com graus próximos de parentesco, o ceiro graus oferecem vantagens, como fortalecimento dos qual pode ser de curto ou longo prazo, com ou sem geração laços e relações familiares, garantia de saber da história de de filhos (Lumsden & Wilson, 1980; Read, 2014; Tidefors, vida do cônjuge antes do casamento, facilidade de acertar Arvidsson, Ingevaldson, & Larsson, 2010).
    [Show full text]