Breeding Farmland Birds and the Role of Habitats Created Under Agri-Environment Schemes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Breeding farmland birds and the role of habitats created under agri-environment schemes Niamh M. McHugh Department of Life Sciences Imperial College London A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy rd 23 of April, 2015 Abstract In this thesis, I aim to assess how farmland birds use insect-rich agri-environment scheme (AES) foraging habitats during the breeding season and how such birds might benefit from them. It is particularly focused on how the coverage and quality (measured by insect food levels and food accessibility) of AES habitats influence territory selection, foraging activities and breeding success. The thesis begins by explaining why farmland birds have declined, reviewing how AES may help reverse these trends, along with outlining why AES may fail to benefit breeding birds (Chapter one). I then investigated whether the addition of wildflowers to AES margins, boundary type, crop type, chick food availability or accessibility influenced the foraging activity of insectivores, mixed diet species and the passerine community in general (Chapter two). Next, I wanted to find out if territory selection by a declining farmland bird the yellowhammer Emberiza citronella related to the quantity of AES habitat available; models also accounted for chick food abundance, landscape diversity and nest site features (Chapter three). Subsequently I investigated how the availability of AES can affect chick diet and survival using the Eurasian tree sparrow Passer monatus as a focus species. I compared the abundance and diversity of tree sparrow chick food items between nest boxes with and without access to AES habitats aimed at foraging birds (Chapter four). I then documented whether tree sparrow productivity was limited by the availability of such invertebrate- rich foraging habitat (Chapter five). As the majority of AES studies use only short-term data sets, my final data chapter aimed to address this by linking trends in yellowhammer and common chaffinch Fringilla coelebs nest success to the total chick food abundance of available arable and AES habitats over an 10 year period (Chapter six). The thesis concludes by considering future research directions of AES and farmland bird studies in the United Kingdom (Chapter seven). i Thesis Declaration Declaration of Originality I confirm that all work within this thesis is my own, except where declared below. The data for Chapters two and three were collected with the help of three masters’ student Cecily Goodwin, Sophie Hughes and Jacqui Machin under my supervision. Data for Chapter six on annual trends in agri-environment scheme invertebrate populations and nest survival were provided by the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust. Copyright Declaration The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives licence. Researchers are free to copy, distribute or transmit the thesis on the condition that they attribute it, that they do not use it for commercial purposes and that they do not alter, transform or build upon it. For any reuse or redistribution, researchers must make clear to others the licence terms of this work. ii Acknowledgements I would like to start by thanking my funders the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust (GWCT) and Natural England for their monetary support through a CASE studentship. Without this funding none of this work would have been possible. A number of people provided help along the way most notably the North Wiltshire ringing group, Patrick White, Simon Lane, Tom Porteus, Julie Ewald, Neville Kingdon, Christopher Wheatley, Mark Whiteside, John Szczur, Gillian Gooderham, David Orme, E.J. Milner- Gulland, Barbara Smith, Nick Sotherton, Mick Crawley, Francis Buner, Andrew Knight, Andrew Hoodless, Nicholas Aebischer, Carlos Sánchez and Barbara Sanger. Special thanks are due to Steve Moreby for his help, patience and enthusiasm when teaching me to identify invertebrates and faecal fragments and also to Matt Prior, Cecily Goodwin, Sophie Hughes and Jacqui Machin for their assistance in the field and most importantly their company whist we waited for it to stop raining. Phil Grice – thank you for taking the time to read my thesis draft and for providing extremely helpful comments. Thank you to my supervisors Simon Leather and John Holland. Simon, I am extremely grateful that you gave me the opportunity to carry out this project and I would like to thank you for the expertise you contributed. John, you have always done what is best for me and I can never thank you enough for the support, guidance and encouragement you gave me throughout my PhD. iii To everyone at the GWCT, thank you for being so welcoming and making Fordingbridge my home away from home. I would especially like to thank all of the students who made my time there so enjoyable – Lizzie Grayshon, Ryan Burrell, David Evershed, Jessica Chadwick, Amy Smith, Laura Kor, Holly Narey, Freya Stacey, Lucy Coals, Tom Elliott, Liam Crowley, Claire Blowers and honorary student / wine night enthusiast Megan Hey. To everyone from the walled garden tearoom, thank you for keeping me both calm and refreshed on those stressful days. I would like to thank all of the friends I have made at Imperial over the years, especially my fellow PhD students – Henrietta Pringle, Will Pearse, Giovanni Rapacciuolo, Mark Ramsden, Kate Luckett and Diane Lawrence – and the friends I made whilst doing my masters there – Emma Jane Sheard, Francisca Sconce, Annie English, Rachael Hall and Sandy Morrison. Thanks to my family for encouraging me to pursue this PhD and fostering my enthusiasm for wildlife and the environment from an early age. Finally, I would like to thank my sister Elaine, for always beings there when I needed her and my partner Christopher for helping me with fieldwork, proofreading my thesis and for always being ready with a cup of tea. Thank you for everything. iv Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... i Thesis Declaration .................................................................................................................... ii Declaration of Originality ..................................................................................................... ii Copyright Declaration ........................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ iii Contents .................................................................................................................................. iii Tables ...................................................................................................................................... vii Figures .................................................................................................................................... xiv Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ xix 1. General Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Farmland bird population declines and agricultural intensification ........................ 1 1.2 Agri-environment schemes ............................................................................................. 4 1.3. Why might AES fail to benefit farmland birds? ......................................................... 7 1.4. Thesis aim .................................................................................................................. 8 1.5. Thesis objectives and predictions .............................................................................. 9 2. Use of Grass-only and Wildflower Margins as Foraging Habitat by Farmland Passerines ................................................................................................................................ 13 2.1. Introduction.............................................................................................................. 13 2.2. Methods .................................................................................................................... 17 2.2.1. Margin selection................................................................................................... 17 2.2.2. Vegetation survey ................................................................................................ 17 2.2.3. Invertebrate sampling........................................................................................... 18 2.2.4. Passerine surveys ................................................................................................. 19 2.2.5. Analysis................................................................................................................ 21 2.3. Results ...................................................................................................................... 24 2.3.1. Vegetation differences between margin types ..................................................... 24 2.3.2. Margin features and invertebrate abundance ....................................................... 25 2.3.3. Passerine foraging and habitat type ....................................................................