RIT Fraternities and Sororities Records Ritarc.0545
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
MU PHI EPSILON COLLEGIATE CHAPTER BYLAWS BYLAWS Of
MU PHI EPSILON COLLEGIATE CHAPTER BYLAWS BYLAWS of Beta Alpha Chapter of Mu Phi Epsilon International Professional Music Fraternity at California State University, Fullerton ARTICLE I. Name Section 1. The Name of this Chapter shall be Beta Alpha Chapter of Mu Phi Epsilon International Professional Music Fraternity. ARTICLE II. Purposes and Aims Section 1. Beta Alpha is a Chapter of Mu Phi Epsilon International Professional Music Fraternity. The purpose of this organization is the recognition of scholarship and musicianship, and the development of a bond of friendship among its members; its Aim is the advancement of music in the community, in the nation and in the world through the promotion of musicianship, scholarship, therapy, and education, with an emphasis on service through music. ARTICLE III. Requirements for Membership and Selection of Members Section 1. Membership in the organization shall be open to all undergraduate music major/minor regularly‐enrolled California State University, Fullerton students who are interested in membership. Faculty and professional music staff of California State University, Fullerton are also eligible for membership. There shall be no other requirements for admission to regular membership except those that follow the International Collegiate Manual of the Professional Music Fraternity Mu Phi Epsilon. Each regular member has equal rights and privileges. a. Undergraduates must: 1. be music majors or minors, or the equivalent thereof, enrolled in the school as a candidate for a degree; 2. have attained second‐term (quarter, trimester) freshman standing and have passed first‐term theory or an equivalency examination formulated by a theory faculty member; 3. have a minimum grade point average as specified by the fraternity of 3.0 music and 2.0 academic (A=4.0) b. -
Tau Beta Sigma Separate Session Minutes July 18 – 22, 2017
Tau Beta Sigma Separate Session Minutes July 18 – 22, 2017 Tau Beta Sigma July 18 – 22, 2017 National Honorary Band Sorority 36th Biennial National Convention Orlando, Florida Table of Contents Separate Session #1..................................................................................................................................................3 Separate Session #2..................................................................................................................................................4 Separate Session #3..................................................................................................................................................5 Separate Session #4..................................................................................................................................................6 Separate Session #5..................................................................................................................................................6 Separate Session #6..................................................................................................................................................8 Appendix A: Tau Beta Sigma Standing Rules .......................................................................................................11 Appendix B: Biennial Report of the Board of Trustees ................................................................................12 Appendix C: Report of the National Vice President for Professional Relations ...........................................14 -
Mu Phi Epsilon Collegiate Chapter Bylaws
MU PHI EPSILON COLLEGIATE CHAPTER BYLAWS BYLAWS of The Phi Tau Chapter of Mu Phi Epsilon International Professional Music Fraternity at the University of North Texas PREAMBLE The Phi Tau Collegiate Chapter is a chapter of Mu Phi Epsilon International Professional Music Fraternity. Its Purposes are the recognition of scholarship and musicianship, and the development of a bond of friendship among its members; its Aim is the advancement of music in the community, in the nation and in the world through the promotion of musicianship, scholarship, therapy, and education, with an emphasis on service through music. ARTICLE I. Members Qualifications for Membership Section 1. Those persons eligible for membership in the Phi Tau Chapter shall be undergraduates, graduate students, faculty and professional music staff of the University of North Texas. A. Undergraduates must: 1. be music majors or minors, or the equivalent thereof, enrolled in the school as a candidate for a degree; 2. have attained second-term (quarter, trimester) freshman standing; 3. have a minimum grade point average as specified by the fraternity of 3.0 music and 2.0 academic (A=4.0) B. Transfer students must meet the requirements outlined in Section 1A above and must have established a grade point average in the school where membership is proposed. C. Graduate students whose undergraduate degree was in music are eligible for membership at any time. Other graduate students must be pursuing a music degree and meet the grade point average standard set forth in Section 1A3 at the school proposing membership. D. Special Permission to allow exceptions to any of these qualifications specified in Section 1A may be granted in certain cases with the approval of the International Executive Board. -
National Bylaws
1 SIGMA ALPHA IOTA NATIONAL BYLAWS ARTICLE I - NAME The name of this organization shall be Sigma Alpha Iota International Music Fraternity, whose purposes are stated in the Articles of Association. ARTICLE II - GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 1. General Policies and Procedures A. Any Fraternity procedures or obligations, either chapter or individual, which are not specifically defined in these Bylaws, shall be handled in accordance with established procedures as prescribed in appropriate Fraternity publications. B. All chapters shall comply with the policies as set forth in the Chapter Procedures Manual and other Fraternity publications. And C. Any provision in chapter bylaws that conflicts with a provision in the National Bylaws shall be null and void. Section 2. Voting Procedures All national actions voted on by the chapters and the National Officers Conference require an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the ballots cast, except for election of officers at the National Convention which is by majority vote. (See Article X, Section 3.G.) Section 3. Acronyms The following acronyms will be used as appropriate in these Bylaws: A. Sigma Alpha Iota - SAI B. National Executive Board - NEB C. National Officers Conference - NOC D. Member in Training - MIT ARTICLE III - MEMBERSHIP Section l. Categories of Membership A. This Fraternity shall have four categories of membership: Collegiate, Alumnae, Patroness and Distinguished. B. No person who has held membership in Mu Phi Epsilon, Delta Omicron or Phi Beta shall be eligible for any category of membership. Section 2. Collegiate Membership A. Requirements 1. To be eligible for election to collegiate membership in the Fraternity, the proposed candidate shall be: a. -
Differences in Recruitment Preparation Between Business Fraternities and Social Greek Organizations
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Joseph Wharton Scholars Wharton Undergraduate Research 8-1-2018 Differences in Recruitment Preparation Between Business Fraternities and Social Greek Organizations David Pang University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/joseph_wharton_scholars Part of the Business Commons, and the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Pang, D. (2018). "Differences in Recruitment Preparation Between Business Fraternities and Social Greek Organizations," Joseph Wharton Scholars. Available at https://repository.upenn.edu/ joseph_wharton_scholars/52 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/joseph_wharton_scholars/52 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Differences in Recruitment Preparation Between Business Fraternities and Social Greek Organizations Abstract Recruitment preparation is the process of getting ready to pursue employment and the associated feeling and actual level of readiness to do well in the job search. This study explores the recruitment preparation differences between professional business fraternities and social Greek organizations through a survey and expert interviews. The results show that business fraternities are significantly better at ecruitmentr preparation, particularly when it comes to technical question preparation, resumes/cover letters, and industry mentoring, but not when it comes to networking or fit question preparation. The recruitment preparation in both groups were shown to be differentiated from other activities in which members were involved, with business fraternity preparation being more differentiated then social Greek organization preparation. Further segmentation of the data by industry, gender, ethnicity, etc., along with interview insights, add nuance to the overall findings and further the understanding of how and why these trends exist. -
Fraternal Music Organizations and Their Impact on Student
FRATERNAL MUSIC ORGANIZATIONS AND THEIR IMPACT ON STUDENT LEADERSHIP IN COLLEGE BANDS by NICHOLAS O’BRIAN BRATCHER (Under the Direction of Mary Leglar) ABSTRACT Fraternal music organizations (FMOS) span across the country at an average of 200 college campuses, and many undergraduate band students are exposed either through direct participation or exposure through student life. Additionally, many college band directors serve as “stakeholders” with these organizations, and serve as faculty advisors and sponsors, while counting on the programs to be effective in developing leadership in their band students. This study attempts to evaluate the impact of membership in FMOs on college student bandleaders. The study explored the relationship between student traits (gender, class standing, and FMO participation) and three levels of outcomes on the individual, organizational, and community level using an adapted version of Black’s Leadership Measurement Instrument (Black, 2006). The research followed a quantitative, correlational design (survey). An electronic survey instrument was developed to collect the data from a population of 390 student bandleaders. Black’s Leadership Measurement Instrument (BLMI) was found to be highly reliable and valid and effectively measured the outcomes of FMOs on the student bandleader experience. INDEX WORDS: Black’s Leadership Measurement Instrument, Fraternal Music Organization, college band, student bandleader, student traits FRATERNAL MUSIC ORGANIZATIONS AND THEIR IMPACT ON STUDENT LEADERSHIP IN COLLEGE BANDS -
Delta Sigma Pi
DELTA SIGMA PI CHAPTER BYLAWS (APRIL 2014) ZETA PHI CHAPTER BYLAWS FOR INTERNATIONAL FRATERNITY OF DELTA SIGMA PI ZETA PHI CHAPTER OF DELTA SIGMA PI AT FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY CHAPTER BYLAWS TABLE OF CONTENTS PREAMBLE ....................................................................................................................................... 1 ARTICLE IName ............................................................................................................................... 1 ARTICLE IIOrganization and Government .............................................................................................. 1 ARTICLE IIIMembership, Election, and Initiation .................................................................................... 1 ARTICLE IVFinances ......................................................................................................................... 3 ARTICLE VMeetings.......................................................................................................................... 4 ARTICLE VIOfficer Elections and Officer Duties .................................................................................... 4 ARTICLE VIICommittees and Their Duties........................................................................................... 98 ARTICLE VIII–Individual Discipline .................................................................................................... 10 ARTICLE IXPublication and Publicity ................................................................................................ -
THE KEY VOL 77 NO 4 WINTER 1960.Pdf
First things first Speaking on the subject, "Collegiate Trends and Creek Opportunities," at the 1959 National Inter fraternity Conference, President Wells of Indiana called attention to "the rising emphasis on the intellec tual substance of the undergraduate collegiate experience" and challenged fraternities to "insist on a new intellectual dimension in fraternity life." He reminded fraternities that "the first purpose of our actives in college is to gain there an intellectual experience to prepare themselves for an age in which the only remaining frontier is the limitless frontier of the mind" and advised a return to the objectives of the early Creek Letter societies. With President Wells' counsel Kappa Kappa Gamma is in accord. We accept the challenge for a "new intellectual dimension in fraternity life" as long overdue. We have long since learned however that "to believe is not enough." Hence, we must intensify our efforts to encourage and foster individual intellec tual attainment and may well begin by clarifying our objectives and re-thinking our policies, procedures and programs. Again, heeding President Wells' admonition of a return to early objectives for clues to meeting current needs, a review of Kappa history has learnings for us. Although the campus of 1870 would seem to have little in common with that of 1960, a study of our records reveals many similarities. The period following the Civil War was also one of unprecedented growth and change in higher education. It had special significance for women, as broadening educational horizons do today. It was then that college doors were opening for women, albeit reluctantly, and "over faculty protests against the intrusion." Our founding mothers were under compulsion to prove that "they were intellectually able and physically fit for the rigors of advanced intellectual training." They dared not fail lest the doors close for who-knows how-long. -
Here a Purpose? I G I'll Never Know! There Are No Grey Areas in Hazing
focus: Deltasigs from Delta Tau Chapter at Indiana State gather on the Indiana State Annual Donaghy Day Clean-Up as a community serv· ice project. 2 The January. 1979 ISSUE January, 1979 Volume LXVII, No. 2 An Educational Journal • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Features Departments commentary . 4 Let's Look at Reg ionals 5 bulletin board ............... 20 others begin .... ........... 21 kaleidoscope ... 11 Convention 32nd Grand Chapter Congress August 1 2-16, 1979 The Marriott Hotel lifestyle . .. 27 Atlanta, Georgia • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Editor Cover Ben H. Wolfenbarger Highly successful regional con ferences were held In Fall of 1978. Associate Editor Lers look at some of them begin Michae l J . Till ar ning on page 5 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Postm aster: Please send labels Form 3579 to Della Sigma Pl. 330 South Campus Avenue, Oxford . Ohio 45056. The DEL TASIG of Delta Sigma Pi is published four times annually In the months of November, January, March, and May. Editorial office - 330 South Campus Avenue. Oxford , Ohio 45056. Subscription price: $10.00 per year. Second Class postag paid at Oxford, Ohio 45056. and at additional mailing offices. Print d In the U.S.A. M mb r of oil g Ft·at m ity Editot·s A sociation comm •••• Our Board of Directors has a printed statement 011 hazing on page 41 of our Manual for Pledge Education. I pledged and joined a national high school fraterni which had to operate off campus because of its ha practices. I well remember the hazing, beltlines unprofessional activities that took place during pl ing and initiation. I remember the individuals name and exactly what was done to me. -
Alumni Data Points Important?
0 | Page TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................. 2 OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................... 3 RAISER’S EDGE DATABASE ..................................................................................... 5 CURRENT ATTRIBUTES ............................................................................................. 7 RECOMMENDED DATA POINTS .............................................................................. 17 ADDED DATA POINTS .................................................................................... 17 REMOVED/CLEANED DATA POINTS ............................................................. 22 IMPORTED DATA TYPES .......................................................................................... 24 UT DALLAS CAREER CENTER (COMET CAREERS) .................................... 24 ORGSYNC ....................................................................................................... 25 ORION APPLICANTCENTER & STUDENT CENTER ..................................... 26 APPLYTEXAS.ORG ......................................................................................... 27 IMPORTING DATA INTO CONSTITUENT RECORDS .............................................. 28 IMPORTING NEW RECORDS ......................................................................... 28 UPDATING EXISTING RECORDS ................................................................. -
Fall, Winter, Spring and Summer Bv Ful, New Offices in Englewood, Col the Gamma Phi Beta Sorority, Inc
Crescent Assifnments &II 1979 For Spring Issue: Founders Day highlights Alumnae Career Corner articles Alumnae Pacesetter articles Colossal Collegian articles College Collage articles Feature articles Deadline: December I, 1979 Welcome Delta Pi Crescent Correspondents: Please read the Crescent assign ment page in the Crescent Com munique, which you can obtain Alumnae Opportunities Enriching from your president. PR ocu Lighting up Editors and Awarded f Editor-in-Chief Scholarships Fellowships Kris Brandt Riske 1222 E. Cordova Casa Grande, AZ 85222 Yes, You Can 1 Alumnae Editor Judy Haverfield Beaupre i: 94 Thistledown Drive Coping with College Costs Rochester, NY 14617 Collegiate Editor: Carol Asel Collegiate Honors 29 4612 Amesbury #288 Dallas, TX 75206 3J Feature Editor: Career Corner Margy Molden Wiltamuth 1700 Kiva Road Silver Spring, MD 20904 Sisters Speak 3( Business Manager Jonette Crowley Central Office ON THE COVER: Beatrice Barker Evenson (Oregon) in front of the Casa i Prado building, Balboa Park, San Diego. Story on page 37. Gamma Phi Beta USPS 137-620 Gamma Phi Beta's international headquarters has moved to beauti The Crescent is published quarterly in Fall, Winter, Spring and Summer bv ful, new offices in Englewood, Col the Gamma Phi Beta Sorority, Inc. 7503 Marin Drive, Englewood, CO 80111 Printed in Associates. orado, a suburb of Denver. All cor the U.S.A. by Compolith Graphics and Maury Boyd & Second class at CO and additional mailing office respondence should be directed to postage paid Englewood, Gamma Phi Beta, Inc., Internation " Postmaster: Please send notice of undeliverable copies on Form 3579 al Headquarters, 7503 Marin Gamma Phi Beta, Inc., International Headquarters, 7503 Marin Driv Drive, Englewood, CO 80111. -
On Behalf of the Office of Sorority and Fraternity Life We Are Happy to Present the Summarized Academic Results from Spring Quarter 2016
July 26, 2016 Dear Sorority and Fraternity Leaders and Stakeholders: On behalf of the Office of Sorority and Fraternity Life we are happy to present the summarized academic results from Spring Quarter 2016. As a community, the All-Sorority and Fraternity Grade Point Average (3.048) is above the All- Student Grade Point Average at UC Davis (2.897) for Spring Quarter 2016. Individually, congratulations are due to Alpha Epsilon Pi, whose members earned the highest average Spring GPA (3.31), and Sigma Alpha Epsilon Pi for receiving the highest average cumulative GPA (3.35). Please see the tables on the following pages for more detailed information about the academic performance of our community. For questions about chapter academic performance, please feel free to contact us directly (530.752.4606; [email protected] or 530.752.3828; [email protected]). Interfraternally, J. Valerie Lamarre Laurent Sorority and Fraternity Life Coordinator Student Housing Michael Eberhard Sorority and Fraternity Life Coordinator Student Housing Table 1. A summary of sorority and fraternity grades for each of the past three academic Quarters – Spring 2016, Winter 2016, and Fall 2015. Spring 2016 Winter 2016 Fall 2015 Category (68 groups) (67 groups) (66 groups) Students Quarter Cumulative Students Quarter Cumulative Students Quarter Cumulative Affiliated Women 1,692 3.105 3.096 1,655 3.103 3.079 1,583 3.005 1,675 All-Campus Women 15,786 2.962 3.006 16,474 2.925 2.982 17,749 2.807 15,223 Affiliated Men 820 2.93 2.993 807 2.929 2.996 812 2.905 970 All-Campus Men 10,885 2.803 2.902 11,435 2.783 2.889 12,556 2.682 11,063 All Affiliated 2,512 3.048 3.062 2,462 3.045 3.052 2,395 2.971 2,645 All-Campus 26,672 2.897 2.964 27,909 2.867 2.944 30,309 2.755 26,286 Table 2.