County Genus Species Species Author Common

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

County Genus Species Species Author Common Name Tribe Subfamily Family Superfamily Emmet County Acronicta grisea Walker, 1856 Gray Dagger Moth (None) Acronictinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Emmet County Anterastria teratophora (Herrich-Schaffer, 1854) Gray Marvel Moth Pseudeustrotiini Noctuinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Emmet County Baileya dormitans (Guenee, 1852) Sleeping Baileya Moth Risobinae Nolidae Noctuoidea Emmet County Choristoneura fractivittana (Clemens, 1865) None Archipini Tortricinae Tortricidae Tortricoidea Emmet County Clemensia albata Packard, 1864 Little White Lichen Moth Lithosiini Arctiinae Erebidae Noctuoidea Emmet County Clepsis melaleucana (Walker, 1863) None Archipini Tortricinae Tortricidae Tortricoidea Emmet County Crambus laqueatellus Clemens, 1860 Eastern Grass-veneer Moth Crambini Crambinae Crambidae Pyraloidea Emmet County Ethmia zelleriella (Chambers, 1878) None Ethmiinae Elachistidae Gelechioidea Emmet County Heliomata cycladata Grote & Robinson, 1866 Common Spring Moth Macariini Ennominae Geometridae Geometroidea Emmet County Horisme intestinata (Guenee, 1857) Brown Bark Carpet Eupitheciini Larentiinae Geometridae Geometroidea Emmet County Lacinipolia renigera (Stephens, 1820) Bristly Cutworm Moth Eriopygini Noctuinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Emmet County Protoboarmia porcelaria (Guenee, 1857) Porcelain Gray Moth Boarmiini Ennominae Geometridae Geometroidea Emmet County Pyrrharctia isabella (J E Smith, 1797) Isabella Tiger Moth Arctiini Arctiinae Erebidae Noctuoidea Emmet County Schinia lucens (Morrison, 1875) Leadplant Flower Moth Heliothinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Emmet County Spargaloma sexpunctata Grote, 1873 Six-spotted Gray Moth Phytometrinae Erebidae Noctuoidea Emmet County Virbia aurantiaca (Hubner, 1827-31) Orange Holomelina Moth Arctiini Arctiinae Erebidae Noctuoidea Emmet County Xestia dolosa Franclemont, 1980 Greater Black-Lettered Dart Noctuini Noctuinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)
WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties.
[Show full text]
An Annotated List of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 38: 1–549 (2010) Annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 MONOGRAPH www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada Gregory R. Pohl1, Gary G. Anweiler2, B. Christian Schmidt3, Norbert G. Kondla4 1 Editor-in-chief, co-author of introduction, and author of micromoths portions. Natural Resources Canada, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 - 122 St., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 3S5 2 Co-author of macromoths portions. University of Alberta, E.H. Strickland Entomological Museum, Department of Biological Sciences, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3 3 Co-author of introduction and macromoths portions. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 4 Author of butterfl ies portions. 242-6220 – 17 Ave. SE, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2A 0W6 Corresponding authors: Gregory R. Pohl ([email protected]), Gary G. Anweiler ([email protected]), B. Christian Schmidt ([email protected]), Norbert G. Kondla ([email protected]) Academic editor: Donald Lafontaine | Received 11 January 2010 | Accepted 7 February 2010 | Published 5 March 2010 Citation: Pohl GR, Anweiler GG, Schmidt BC, Kondla NG (2010) An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada. ZooKeys 38: 1–549. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 Abstract Th is checklist documents the 2367 Lepidoptera species reported to occur in the province of Alberta, Can- ada, based on examination of the major public insect collections in Alberta and the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes.
[Show full text]
Moths of Trinity River National Wildlife Refuge
U.S. FishFish & & Wildlife Wildlife Service Service Moths of Trinity River National Wildlife Refuge Established in 1994, the 25,000-acre Givira arbeloides Trinity River National Wildlife Refuge Prionoxystus robiniae is a remnant of what was once a much Carpenterworm Moth larger, frequently flooded, bottomland hardwood forest. You are still able to Crambid Snout Moths (Crambidae) view vast expanses of ridge and swale Achyra rantalis floodplain features, numerous bayous, Garden Webworm Moth oxbow lakes, and cypress/tupelo swamps Aethiophysa invisalis along the Trinity River. It is one of Argyria lacteella only 14 priority-one bottomland sites Milky Urola Moth identified for protection in the Texas Carectocultus perstrialis Bottomland Protection Plan. Texas is Reed-boring Crambid Moth home to an estimated 4,000 species of Chalcoela iphitalis moths. Most of the nearly 400 species of Sooty-winged Chalcoela moths listed below were photographed Chrysendeton medicinalis around the security lights at the Refuge Bold Medicine Moth Headquarters building located adjacent Colomychus talis to a bottomland hardwood forest. Many Distinguished Colomychus more moths are not even attracted to Conchylodes ovulalis lights, so additional surveys will need Zebra Conchylodes to be conducted to document those Crambus agitatellus species. These forests also support a Double-banded Grass-veneer wide diversity of mammals, reptiles, Crambus satrapellus amphibians, and fish with many feeding Crocidophora tuberculalis on moths or their larvae. Pale-winged Crocidophora Moth Desmia funeralis For more information, visit our website: Grape leaf-folder www.fws.gov/southwest Desmia subdivisalis Diacme elealis Contact the Refuge staff if you should Paler Diacme Moth find an unlisted or rare species during Diastictis fracturalis your visit and provide a description.
[Show full text]
Mistletoes of North American Conifers
United States Department of Agriculture Mistletoes of North Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station American Conifers General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-98 September 2002 Canadian Forest Service Department of Natural Resources Canada Sanidad Forestal SEMARNAT Mexico Abstract _________________________________________________________ Geils, Brian W.; Cibrián Tovar, Jose; Moody, Benjamin, tech. coords. 2002. Mistletoes of North American Conifers. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS–GTR–98. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 123 p. Mistletoes of the families Loranthaceae and Viscaceae are the most important vascular plant parasites of conifers in Canada, the United States, and Mexico. Species of the genera Psittacanthus, Phoradendron, and Arceuthobium cause the greatest economic and ecological impacts. These shrubby, aerial parasites produce either showy or cryptic flowers; they are dispersed by birds or explosive fruits. Mistletoes are obligate parasites, dependent on their host for water, nutrients, and some or most of their carbohydrates. Pathogenic effects on the host include deformation of the infected stem, growth loss, increased susceptibility to other disease agents or insects, and reduced longevity. The presence of mistletoe plants, and the brooms and tree mortality caused by them, have significant ecological and economic effects in heavily infested forest stands and recreation areas. These effects may be either beneficial or detrimental depending on management objectives. Assessment concepts and procedures are available. Biological, chemical, and cultural control methods exist and are being developed to better manage mistletoe populations for resource protection and production. Keywords: leafy mistletoe, true mistletoe, dwarf mistletoe, forest pathology, life history, silviculture, forest management Technical Coordinators_______________________________ Brian W. Geils is a Research Plant Pathologist with the Rocky Mountain Research Station in Flagstaff, AZ.
[Show full text]
The Desert Marigold Moth
The Desert Marigold Moth Item Type Article Authors Myles, Timothy G.; Binder, Bradley F. Publisher University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Journal Desert Plants Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 26/09/2021 23:21:24 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/609120 Myles and Binder Desert Marigold Moth 75 One of the wildflowers that is invariably featured in pop- ular guides to Southwestern flora is the Desert Marigold, The Desert (Baileya multiradiata Harv. and Gray ex. Torr.). This prom- inent Arizona native is a favorite for several reasons. It is a Marigold Moth vigorous, xeric- adapted, biennial or perennial, low- growing herb with wooly sculptured gray -green leaves (Kearney and Peebles, 1960). Above the attractive leafy clump are a pro- digious number of solitary composite inflorescences (corn - Timothy G. Myles monly called flower heads) each on a foot -long peduncle. The large, showy, richly -yellow flower heads bob and sway and Bradley F. Binder gracefully in the breeze. Of the early spring flowers, it is Department of Entomology one of the most dependable. In the Tucson area the peak of flower production is from March through April but some University of Arizona plants continue to produce some flowers right through summer to as late as November (McGinnies, 1980). Baileya multiradiata, known also as Desert Baileya, is distributed throughout Arizona except for the upper eleva- tions of the northeast. Its range extends into the canyon lands of Utah, southern Nevada, the deserts of southeastern California, eastward across New Mexico and into western Texas, and southward into Chihuahua and Sonora, Mexico (Welsh et al., 1987).
[Show full text]
Great Lakes Entomologist
Vol. 34, No. 2 Fa II/Winter 2001 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST PUBLISHED BY THE MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Published by the Michigan Entomological Society Volume 34 No.2 ISSN 0090-0222 TABLE OF CONTENTS Commentary on Ametropus species (Ephemeroptera: Amertropodidae) in North America W. P. McCafferty....................................................................................................... 1 First record ofAxymyiidae (Diptera: Nematocera: Axymyioidea) from Wisconsin Daniel K. Young and Anneke Lisberg ........................................................................ 7 Checklist of identified Lepidoptera collected at Mud Lake State Nature Preserve, Williams County, Ohio Roy W, Rings ............................................................................................................ 9 Dstribution of terrestrial isopods (Crustacea: Isopoda) throughout Michigan: early results Jennifer L. Stoyenoff ............................................................................................... 29 First Canadian record of Hexaco/a neoscatellae (Hymenoptera: Figitidae: Eucoilinae), a parasitoid of the shore fly, Scatella stagnalis Joshua C. Diamond, Vanessa A. Carney, Graeme D. Murphy, and Wayne R. Allen ...... 51 Hawkmoths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) collected in Grand Traverse and adjacent counties, Michigan Andrew W. Douglass, Christopher B. Douglass, and John F. Douglass .......................... 55 Second location for two rare Odonata in Ohio, Nannothemis bella and Ladona iulia, (Odonata:
[Show full text]
Euteliidae & Nolidae
Cornell University Insect Collection Euteliidae Curated by Kyhl A. Austin Determined species and subspecies: 85 Updated: May 2020 Cornell University Insect Collection Euteliidae: Euteliinae, Stictopterinae Curated by Kyhl A. Austin Determined species and subspecies: 85 Updated: May 2020 CUIC Euteliidae May 2020 Euteliidae Family Subfamily Genus species subspecies (Author Date) Zoogeographic Region Euteliidae Euteliinae Anuga constricta Guenée 1852 ORI Anuga multiplicans Walker 1858 ORI Aplotelia tripartita (Semper 1900) ORI Atacira grabczewskii (Püngeler 1904) PAL Chlumetia transversa (Walker 1863) ORI Eutelia abscondens Walker 1858 NEO Eutelia ablatrix (Guenée 1852) NEO Eutelia adulatrix (Hübner [1813]) PAL Eutelia auratrix (Walker 1858) NEO Eutelia blandiatrix Guenée 1852 PAL/ORI Eutelia discitriga Walker 1865 ETH Eutelia furcata (Walker 1865) NEA Eutelia geyeri (Felder & Rogenhofer 1874) PAL Eutelia haxairei Barbut & Lalanne-Cassou 2005 NEO Eutelia leighi Hampson 1905 ETH Eutelia leucodelta Hampson 1905 ETH Eutelia piratica (Schaus 1940) NEO Eutelia porphyrina (Warren 1914) AUS Eutelia pulcherrimus (Grote 1865) NEA Eutelia pyrastis Hampson 1905 NEO Eutelia snelleni (Saalmüller 1881) ETH Marathyssa basalis Walker 1865 NEA Marathyssa cuneata (Saalmüller 1891) ETH Marathyssa inficita (Walker 1865) NEA Marathyssa minus Dyar 1921 NEA Paectes abrostolella (Walker 1866) NEA Paectes abrostoloides (Guenée 1852) NEA Paectes acutangula Hampson 1912 NEA Paectes albescens Hampson 1912 NEO Paectes arcigera (Guenée 1852) NEO Paectes areusa (Walker
[Show full text]
Species on the Menu of a Generalist
Molecular Ecology (2009) 18, 2532–2542 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04184.x SpeciesBlackwell Publishing Ltd on the menu of a generalist predator, the eastern red bat (Lasiurus borealis): using a molecular approach to detect arthropod prey ELIZABETH L. CLARE,* ERIN E. FRASER,† HEATHER E. BRAID*, M. BROCK FENTON† and PAUL D. N. HEBERT* *Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G2W1, †Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada N6A 5B7 Abstract One of the most difficult interactions to observe in nature is the relationship between a predator and its prey. When direct observations are impossible, we rely on morphological classification of prey remains, although this is particularly challenging among generalist predators whose faeces contain mixed and degraded prey fragments. In this investigation, we used a poly- merase chain reaction and sequence-based technique to identify prey fragments in the guano of the generalist insectivore, the eastern red bat (Lasiurus borealis), and evaluate several hypotheses about prey selection and prey defences. The interaction between bats and insects is of significant evolutionary interest because of the adaptive nature of insect hearing against echolocation. However, measuring the successes of predator tactics or particular prey defences is limited because we cannot normally identify these digested prey fragments beyond order or family. Using a molecular approach, we recovered sequences from 89% of the fragments tested, and through comparison to a reference database of sequences, we were able to identify 127 different species of prey. Our results indicate that despite the robust jaws of L. borealis, most prey taxa were softer-bodied Lepidoptera.
[Show full text]
Food Habits of Rodents Inhabiting Arid and Semi-Arid Ecosystems of Central New Mexico." (2007)
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of New Mexico University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Special Publications Museum of Southwestern Biology 5-10-2007 Food Habits of Rodents Inhabiting Arid and Semi- arid Ecosystems of Central New Mexico Andrew G. Hope Robert R. Parmenter Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/msb_special_publications Recommended Citation Hope, Andrew G. and Robert R. Parmenter. "Food Habits of Rodents Inhabiting Arid and Semi-arid Ecosystems of Central New Mexico." (2007). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/msb_special_publications/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Museum of Southwestern Biology at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Special Publications by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPECIAL PUBLICATION OF THE MUSEUM OF SOUTHWESTERN BIOLOGY NUMBER 9, pp. 1–75 10 May 2007 Food Habits of Rodents Inhabiting Arid and Semi-arid Ecosystems of Central New Mexico ANDREW G. HOPE AND ROBERT R. PARMENTER1 Special Publication of the Museum of Southwestern Biology 1 CONTENTS Abstract................................................................................................................................................ 5 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Study Sites ..........................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Sonorensis 2010
Sonorensis contents Sonoran Desert Insects Introduction Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum Our Volume 30, Number 1 Winter 2010 Christine Conte, Ph.D. The Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum Cultural Ecologist, Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum Co-founded in 1952 by 1 Introduction Arthur N. Pack and William H. Carr Craig Ivanyi Christine Conte, Ph.D. photo by Executive Director Alex Wild Christine Conte, Ph.D. The real voyage of discovery consists Cultural Ecologist 2-7 Insects: Six-Legged Arthropods that Run the World not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes. Richard C. Brusca, Ph.D. Wendy Moore, Ph.D. & Carl Olson Senior Director, Science and Conservation —Marcel Proust Linda M. Brewer Editing 8-11 Plants & Insects: A 400-Million-Year Co-Evolutionary Dance Wendy Moore, Ph.D ach year, Sonorensis brings the Museum’s It is little wonder that in almost every culture, photo by Alex Wild E Entomology Editor Mark A. Dimmitt, Ph.D. & Richard C. Brusca, Ph.D. conservation science team and its colleagues in throughout world, insects have played a prominent Martina Clary the community to your doorstep with thoughtful, role in philosophy, psychology, and religion. Design and Production engaging, and informative perspectives on the They have been portrayed as symbols of gods and 12-17 Fit to Be Eaten: A Brief Introduction to Entomophagy Sonorensis is published by the Arizona-Sonora Desert natural and cultural history of the Sonoran celebrated in stories, songs, literature, and art. Here Museum, 2021 N. Kinney Road, Tucson, Arizona 85743. Marci Tarre ©2010 by the Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum, Inc. All rights Desert Region.
[Show full text]
Bioblitz 2021- Wehrnaturecenter
Species Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 American Crow x x x American Goldfinchx x x American Robin x x x Baltimore Oriole x x x Barred Owl x Barn Swallow x x x Black-capped chickadee x x Blue Grey Gnatcatcherx x Blue Jay x x x Brown-headed Cowbird x Canada Goose x Cedar Waxwing x x x Chimney Swift x x x Common Grackle x x Common Yellowthroat x x Downy Woodpecker x Eastern Bluebird x Eastern Kingbird x Eastern Towhee x Eastern Wood-Peweex x x European Starling x Field Sparrow x Gray Catbird x x Great Blue Heron x x Great Crested Flycatcherx x Green Heron x Grey Catbird x x x Hairy Woodpecker x x House Finch x House Wren x x Indigo Bunting x x x Kildeer x Larus Sp. x Mallard x x Mourning Dove x x Northern Cardinal x x Northern Flicker x x x Northern Rough Winged Swallow x Orchard Oriole x phoebe x Red Bellied Woodpeckerx x x Red Tailed Hawk x x Red-eyed vireo x x Red-winged blackbirdx x x Rose Breasted Grossbeak x x Ruby Throated Hummingbird x Song Sparrow x x Tree swallow x x x Turkey Vulture x Warbling Vireo x x White-breasted Nuthatch x x Wild Turkey x Wood Duck x Wood Thrush f x x Woodcock x Yellow Warbler x Ring illed Gull x Scarlet Tanager x Coopers Hawk x Belted Kingfisher x Rock Dove Common Name Scientific Name Family Creek Chub Semotilus atromaculatus Cyprinidae (Leuciscidae) Bluntnose Minnow Pimephales notatus Cyprinidae (Leuciscidae) Golden Shiner Notemigonus chrysoleucas Cyprinidae (Leuciscidae) White Sucker Catostomus commersonii Catostomidae Yellow Bullhead Ameiurus natalis Ictaluridae Black Bullhead Ameiurus melas Ictaluridae
[Show full text]
Credibility of the Present Molecular-Systematics? 1
ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Atalanta Jahr/Year: 2016 Band/Volume: 47 Autor(en)/Author(s): Beck Herbert Artikel/Article: Credibility of the present molecular-systematics? 1. What is to do if a group, e.g. the family Nolidae s.l., is larvally inequivocally revealed as wrong defined by the imaginal-systematists but confirmed by the molecular workers? 2. The unjustified splitting of the Noctuidae s. Hampson into the Erebidae and Noctuidae s. str. (Lepidoptera, Noctuoidea) 281-289 Atalanta 47 (3/4): 281-289, Marktleuthen (Dezember 2016), ISSN 0171-0079 Credibility of the present molecular-systematics? 1. What is to do if a group, e.g. the family Nolidae s.l., is larvally inequivocally revealed as wrong defined by the imaginal-systematists but confirmed by the molecular workers? 2. The unjustified splitting of the Noctuidae s.H AMPSON into the Erebidae and Noctuidae s. str. (Lepidoptera, Noctuoidea) by HERBERT BECK received 3.VI.2016 Abstract: The larval-imaginal-systematic comparison between the present Nolidae s. l., s. KITCHING & RAWLINS (1998) and the Nolidae s. HAMPSON inequivocally reveals that the present family Nolidae s. l. is not to be hold. The most reli- able apomorphy, the boat-shaped cocoon is not at all reliable. The characters for the Nolidae s. str. - only three pairs of prolegs on A4-A6 and the construction of the scaphium - are not applicable for to enlarge the family Nolidae s. str. to the Nolidae s. l. To maintain the primary setation of the larvae of all the subfam.
[Show full text]