DOCSLIB.ORG

Food Fraud Prevention Economically-Motivated Adulteration Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Food Fraud Prevention Economically-Motivated Adulteration Table of Contents Food Fraud Prevention Economically-motivated adulteration Table of contents 2 Introduction and purpose of this booklet 3 What is food fraud 4 Why is it important to prevent food fraud 4 Glossary of terms used in this booklet 5 Food fraud prevention process 6 Vulnerability assessment 10 Mitigation measures 10 – Raw material specifications 10 – Analytical surveillance 11 – Supplier relationship 13 – Supplier audit 14 – Supply chain transparency and simplification 16 Alert system 16 Frequently asked questions 19 Useful resources & tools 1 Introduction and purpose What is food fraud of this booklet The food industry considers the safety No process can guarantee that food Food fraud commonly encompasses • Deliberate mislabelling of food, of its products as its main concern. Over and food supply are not the target of a wide range of deliberate fraudulent such as: the years, industry and regulators have criminal activity. The purpose of this acts. The focus of this booklet – products substituted with developed food safety management booklet is to guide food operators however, is on one type of food fraud a cheaper alternative, systems, making major outbreaks of through approaches and processes to – the intentional and economically- e. g. farmed salmon sold as wild, food poisoning now quite unusual in improve the resilience of supply chains motivated adulteration of foods. This or Basmati rice adulterated many countries. These systems typically to food fraud. It provides guidance on is the fraudulent addition of non- with cheaper varieties; use Hazard Analysis Critical Control how to assure the authenticity of food authentic substances, or the removal or – false statements about the source Point (HACCP) principles, which are by minimising vulnerability to fraud and replacement of authentic substances of ingredients, i.e. their geographic, accepted globally. HACCP has proven mitigating the consequences of food without the purchaser’s knowledge, for plant or animal origin. to be effective against accidental fraud. economic gain of the seller. contamination. This booklet does not address the The two main types of economi- other types of food fraud such as However, HACCP principles have cally-motivated adulteration are: counterfeiting (fraudulently passing not been routinely used to detect or • Sale of food which is unfit and off inferior goods as established and mitigate deliberate, fraudulent actions potentially harmful, such as: reputable brands), product tampering, on a system or process. These actions – recycling of animal by-products theft, smuggling, document fraud, and include the deliberate contamination of back into the food chain; product diversions. Neither does it cover food, or food fraud. – packing and selling of meat with food adulteration intended to cause This booklet unknown origin; public health harm, economic harm, or • Describes a process for food fraud – knowingly selling goods past their terror (i.e. food defense issues). prevention and the principles of the ‘use by’ date. vulnerability assessment; • Outlines measures that can deter fraudsters, or give early detection of food fraud; Food Safety Management System • Provides sources of information and intelligence that may help to identify emerging threats. Food safety Food defense Food fraud Mitigation of Mitigation of Mitigation of unintentional/ intentional intentional accidental adulteration – adulteration – adulteration – Ideologically Economically Science based motivated motivated 2 3 Why is it important Glossary of terms Food fraud prevention to prevent food fraud used in this booklet process While it is not the intention of food • Economically-motivated Like any management system, a Periodically, or as changes occur that fraud to harm consumers, such acts adulteration (EMA): The intentional food fraud management system is a may impact the previously identified can cause illness and even death. This adulteration of foods, motivated by continuous process as depicted in the vulnerabilities (e.g. a newly identified was the case in 2008 when melamine economic gain. It is the type of fraud figure below (from U.S. Pharmacopeia adulterant for an ingredient is reported, was used as a nitrogen source to covered in this booklet. Appendix XVII: Food Fraud Mitigation changes in the supply chain for an fraudulently increase the measured • Vulnerability assessment (or Guidance). It begins with an evaluation ingredient), the entire process must be protein content of milk, resulting in vulnerability characterisation): step to characterise food fraud carried out again to ensure its continued more than 50 000 babies hospitalised Within a food fraud management vulnerabilities, followed by the design effectiveness. and six deaths after having consumed system, the step aimed at reviewing and review of a mitigation strategy, and contaminated infant formula. and assessing various factors, which its implementation. create vulnerabilities in a supply The common factor in many cases chain (i.e. weak points where fraud of food fraud, is that the adulterant is has greater chances to occur). neither a food safety hazard, nor readily • Mitigation measure: Measure identified (as this would defeat the aim taken to decrease vulnerability to a of the fraudster). Common adulterants certain type of adulteration in a given Food Fraud Management System include water and sugar, or ingredients supply chain. that may be legitimately used and • Mitigation strategy: Selected declared, but whose improper use set of mitigation measures aimed Implement Start le mitigation constitutes fraud. Food fraud deceives at preventing food fraud in a given tab p strategy e the consumers by providing them with supply chain. c c lower quality foodstuff, against their • Food operator: Organisation a knowledge and will. carrying out any of the activities related to processing, manufacture, Changes Determine if Vulner- impacting Economically-motivated adulteration packaging, storage, transportation, draft mitigation abilities vulnerabilities strategy characteri- deprives the consumers of the quality import, distribution of food, including or system acceptable zation products they intend to purchase. It can food services and sale. in place also have serious implications on food • Supplier: The party that is supplying safety and the health of consumers. The materials (raw or semi-finished), food Not acceptable prevention of food fraud is paramount to ingredients or food products to other protect the trust of our consumers and parties (e.g. food operators) in the to maintain fair, sustainable business value chain. Draft of practices. • Buyer: The party that is buying mitigation strategy materials (raw or semi-finished), food ingredients or food products from suppliers. 4 5 Vulnerability assessment A general approach to prevent food To characterise the vulnerability of an fraud can be summarised as follows: ingredient to food fraud, the following • Conduct vulnerability assessment, 3 aspects must be assessed: including: – Know your materials and Vulnerability driven by factors risks (history, economic factors, inherent to the ingredient geographical origins, physical Factors such as the ingredient market state, emerging issues); price, its fraud history, composition, – Know your suppliers physical state and level of processing 50 (manufacturer, broker, history); are entirely independent of the actions /kg – Know your supply chain (length, taken by the buyer to mitigate the risk complexity, supply & demand of fraud. This is defined as the inherent arrangements, ease of access); vulnerability of a food ingredient. – Know your existing control Certain ingredients are by nature measures. more vulnerable to adulteration (e.g. • Design mitigation strategy and apple juices or apple purees are more implement mitigation measures. vulnerable than apple pieces). • Validate and verify mitigation 100 measures, continually review food Fraud history (past cases of adulteration /kg fraud management system. of specific raw materials) is a good source of information. It is an indicator of the raw material potential vulnerability, and an important source of possible adulterants for which detection and deterrence are needed. Vulnerability driven by factors impacting the business (business pressure) Factors such as the demand for a specific ingredient (volume), the extent of its use (ingredient used in several products and businesses), or the market price fluctuation may contribute to an increased level of vulnerability to fraud. If the price of a valuable food is too good to be true, it probably is 6 7 Any anomaly in the economics of may indicate a lack of food control In summary, assessing the risk of Self-assessment particular raw material sources is an and/or regulatory/enforcement fraud for a food ingredient requires Recent food fraud crises have indicator of the raw material potential framework in the country of origin (or the understanding of the inherent raw highlighted the need to reinforce vulnerability. Drastic increases in market any other country through which the material vulnerabilities, the business companies’ ability to combat fraud price and scarce supplies of a raw ingredient may transit). vulnerabilities, and the existing controls – within their own organisation, and material (e.g. poor harvest following bad in place. This will allow to define which across the entire food value chain. weather, or caused by a new parasite) Vulnerability driven by factors preventive actions are needed (and Companies are expected to work
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identification and Quantification of Adulterants in Coffee
    foods Communication Identification and Quantification of Adulterants in Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) Using FT-MIR Spectroscopy Coupled with Chemometrics Mauricio Flores-Valdez 1 , Ofelia Gabriela Meza-Márquez 2 , Guillermo Osorio-Revilla 2 and Tzayhri Gallardo-Velázquez 1,* 1 Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas-Santo Tomás, Departamento de Biofísica, Prolongación de Carpio y Plan de Ayala S/N, Col. Santo Tomás, Alcaldía Miguel Hidalgo, Ciudad de México C.P. 11340, Mexico; [email protected] 2 Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas-Zacatenco, Departamento de Ingeniería Bioquímica, Av. Wilfrido Massieu S/N, Esq. Cda, Miguel Stampa, Col. Unidad Profesional Adolfo López Mateos, Zacatenco, Alcaldía Gustavo A. Madero, Ciudad de México C.P. 07738, Mexico; [email protected] (O.G.M.-M.); [email protected] (G.O.-R.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +52-(55)-5729-6000 (ext. 62305) Received: 24 May 2020; Accepted: 28 June 2020; Published: 30 June 2020 Abstract: Food adulteration is an illegal practice performed to elicit economic benefits. In the context of roasted and ground coffee, legumes, cereals, nuts and other vegetables are often used to augment the production volume; however, these adulterants lack the most important coffee compound, caffeine, which has health benefits. In this study, the mid-infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (FT-MIR) technique coupled with chemometrics was used to identify and quantify adulterants in coffee (Coffea arabica L.). Coffee samples were adulterated with corn, barley, soy, oat, rice and coffee husks, in proportions ranging from 1–30%. A discrimination model was developed using the soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA) framework, and quantitative models were developed using such algorithms as the partial least squares algorithms with one variable (PLS1) and multiple variables (PLS2) and principal component regression (PCR).
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Review Officer Manual
    Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Center for Substance Abuse Prevention Medical Review Officer Manual for Federal Agency Workplace Drug Testing Programs EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2010 Note: This manual applies to Federal agency drug testing programs that come under Executive Order 12564 dated September 15, 1986, section 503 of Public Law 100-71, 5 U.S.C. section 7301 note dated July 11, 1987, and the Department of Health and Human Services Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs (73 FR 71858) dated November 25, 2008 (effective October 1, 2010). This manual does not apply to specimens submitted for testing under U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Procedures for Transportation Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs (49 CFR Part 40). The current version of this manual and other information including MRO Case Studies are available on the Drug Testing page under Medical Review Officer (MRO) Resources on the SAMHSA website: http://www.workplace.samhsa.gov Previous Versions of this Manual are Obsolete 3 Table of Contents Chapter 1. The Medical Review Officer (MRO)........................................................................... 6 Chapter 2. The Federal Drug Testing Custody and Control Form ................................................ 7 Chapter 3. Urine Drug Testing ...................................................................................................... 9 A. Federal Workplace Drug Testing Overview..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1589361321Unit V Food Adulteration.Pdf
    ~oodMicrobiology and the PFA Act, a trader is guilty if he sells milk to which water has been added Safety (intentional addition) or the cream of the milk has been replaced by cheap vegetable or animal fat (substitution) or simply the cream has been removed and the milk is sold as such, with a low fat content (abstraction). Unintentional contamination of the milk, due to carelessness on part of the trader is also considered as adulteration under the law. For instance, if the cans in which the trader is transporting or storing the milk, had been earlier treated with the chemicals like washing soda or boric acid or some detergent and not been washed thoroughly with water, residues of the chemicals may get mixed with the milk. Such milk would Ire considered adulterated. In addition, food is also considered to be adulterated, if it does not conform to the basic quality standards. For instance, the maximum amount of moisture allowed in a milk powder sample is 4%. If a sample is found to have greater moisture levels, it is considered to be adulterated. The malpractice of food adulteration is still widely prevalent in our country. There are very few studies on the extent and nature of food adulteration in the country. Whatever sFdies are available, are restricted to a select few cities and hence are not adequate to give a true picture for the country as a whole. The only data that are available are the reports from the food testing laboratories of the Central and State Government. According to these official reports, the extent of food adulteration in India bas been gradually diminishing from 3 1% in 1960s to less than 10% in the 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • Levamisole: a Toxic Adulterant Found in Illicit Street Drugs
    July 2020 Levamisole: A Toxic Adulterant Found in Illicit Street Drugs. GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH ALERT Substance abuse treatment providers, clinicians, outreach workers, public health clinics, etc. need to be aware of the following information. A dangerous drug adulterant, levamisole, is appearing with increasing frequency in illicit cocaine powder and crack cocaine, and to some extent in heroin and fentanyl. Levamisole can cause severe adverse health effects, including a reduction in the patient’s white blood cell count, a condition called agranulocytosis. THIS IS A VERY SERIOUS ILLNESS THAT NEEDS TO BE TREATED IN A HOSPITAL. SEE ATTACHED TREATMENT AND DIAGNOSIS PLAN. Background: Levamisole was initially developed in the mid-1960s as a veterinary and human anti-worming drug. In 1990, it was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a therapy for the treatment of colorectal cancer, however, by 2000 it had been withdrawn from the market due to severe adverse effects described below. Since the early 2000’s, levamisole has been in widespread use as an adulterating agent for illicit street drugs, especially cocaine, heroin, and fentanyl. Although its prevalence varies over time and geographically, LEVAMISOLE HAS AT TIMES BEEN DETECTED IN UP TO 79% OF THE COCAINE STREET SUPPLY AT VARYING PERCENTAGES, UP TO 74% BY WEIGHT. Frequent Indicators of Levamisole Recommendations for MEs & Coroners Toxicity • Test for common adulterating agents in • Unexplained fever and agranulocytosis suspected stimulant- or opioid-related • Unexplained vasculitis with purple skin death cases where levamisole related lesions over ear lobes, legs and thighs findings, such as leukopenia or necrosis, Levamisole are identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Defense Fact Sheet
    Food Defense Fact Sheet What is Food Defense? Food defense is the protection of food products from intentional contamination or adulteration where there is an intent to cause public health harm and/or economic disruption. Highlighted Food Defense Tools and Resources Food Defense 101 provides training in preparedness against an intentional attack against our food supply. The courses provide an understanding of and guidance for developing a Food Defense Plan(s) based on a common sense approach. http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodDefense/ToolsEducationalMaterials/ucm353774.htm Employees FIRST is an initiative that food industry managers can include in their ongoing employee food defense training programs. Employees FIRST educates front-line food industry workers from farm to table about the risk of intentional food contamination and the actions they can take to identify and reduce these risks. http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodDefense/ToolsEducationalMaterials/ucm295997.htm FDA Food Defense Plan Builder is a user-friendly software program designed to assist owners and operators of food facilities with developing personalized food defense plans for their facilities. This user-friendly tool harnesses existing FDA tools, guidance, and resources for food defense into one single application. The Food Defense Plan Builder guides the user through the following sections: Company Information; Broad Mitigation Strategies; Vulnerability Assessment; Focused Mitigation Strategies; Emergency Contacts; Action Plan; and Supporting Documents. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fdplanbuilder/ Food Related Emergency Exercise Bundle (FREE-B) is a compilation of scenarios based on both intentional and unintentional food contamination events. It is designed with the intention of assisting government regulatory and public health agencies in assessing existing food emergency response plans, protocols and procedures that may be in place, or that they are in the process of revising or even developing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Need for Food Defense in the Post-9/11 Era Can the Risk Be Ignored? Many People Are Familiar with “Food Safety.” It Has Been Likely to Occur in the Food Supply
    The need for food defense in the post-9/11 era Can the risk be ignored? Many people are familiar with “food safety.” It has been likely to occur in the food supply. recognized for many years as being essential for businesses The key words are obviously “unintentional” for food that supply food products anywhere in the supply chain. safety and “intentional” for food defense. The food The term “food defense,” however, is another issue. industry has the personnel and infrastructure in place for food safety, but many in the industry are struggling with Shortly after the tragic events of September 11, 2001, how to approach food defense. the U.S. government became concerned that terrorist organizations might seek to contaminate parts of the Long before 2001, there was documentation of intentional American food supply. In December 2001, the Food food contamination incidents throughout the world. A and Drug Administration (FDA) and the United States study by the Centre of Excellence for National Security Department of Agriculture (USDA) began a dialogue with (CENS) in Singapore, written by G.R. Dalzeil, reported that a number of security professionals in the food industry between 1950 and 2008, there were approximately 398 to determine the current state of readiness against an confirmed incidents of contamination and approximately intentional attack. The information gathered was not 125 unconfirmed incidents. The information for this study encouraging. Prior to 2001, security departments in the was gathered worldwide; however, 42 percent of the food industry were mostly concerned with protecting incidents occurred in the U.S.; the U.S., UK, and Australia people and assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.A REVIEW on EXISTING DATABASES RELEVANT FOR
    Archivos de Zootecnia ISSN: 0004-0592 [email protected] Universidad de Córdoba España Álvarez, B. M.; Pascua, M.; Rusu, A.; Bogason, S.G. A REVIEW ON EXISTING DATABASES RELEVANT FOR FOOD FRAUD AND AUTHENTICITY Archivos de Zootecnia, vol. 62, 2013, pp. 73-91 Universidad de Córdoba Córdoba, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=49558826006 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative BIBLIOGRAPHIC REVIEW A REVIEW ON EXISTING DATABASES RELEVANT FOR FOOD FRAUD AND AUTHENTICITY REVISIÓN DE BASES DE DATOS EXISTENTES Y RELEVANTES EN EL FRAUDE Y AUTENTICIDAD ALIMENTARIAS Álvarez, B.M.1*; Pascual, M.1; Rusu, A.1 and Bogason, S.G.2 1Biozoon Food Innovations GmbH. Bremerhaven. Germany. *[email protected] 2Applied Supply Chain Systems Research Group. University of Iceland. Reykjavík. Iceland. ADDITIONAL KEYWORDS PALABRAS CLAVE ADICIONALES Food adulteration. Food safety. Food composition. Adulteración Alimentaria. Seguridad alimentaria. Food consumption patterns. Food properties. Composición alimentaria. Patrones de consumo Toxicology. Food contaminants. Traceability. de alimentos. Propiedades de los alimentos. Toxi- Molecular information. cología. Contaminantes alimentarios. Trazabilidad. Información molecular. SUMMARY RESUMEN Food fraud and authenticity is a growing issue El fraude y la autenticidad alimentaria es un with a global impact that affects all steps in the problema global que va en aumento y afecta a food chain. Consumers demand safe foods that todas las etapas de la cadena alimentaria. Los meet the specifications on the label claim while the consumidores demandan que los alimentos cum- role is to implement measures to ensure safe food.
    [Show full text]
  • Dietary Supplements Stakeholder Forum Michael Mcguffin, Chair Summary Discussions Wednesday, June 1, 2016
    Dietary Supplements Stakeholder Forum Michael McGuffin, Chair Summary Discussions Wednesday, June 1, 2016 What We Heard USP Updates and Discussions—Adulterants Database Stakeholders —consumers, marketers, regulators—will work together to solve the problem caused by adulterated products that masquerade as dietary supplements (DSs). USP should make more clear that tools to detect adulteration by drug spiking are not meant as standards for manufacturers, but rather as tests for regulators in enforcement/forensic actions. There is sensitivity in the industry about screening methods being required as regular tests for GMP compliance. The adulterants database was well received, but stakeholders emphasized that adulteration by ingredient substitution, dilution, and spiking with botanical chemical markers are areas more relevant for the manufacturers than adulteration by drug spiking. 2 What We Heard USP Updates and Discussions—Adulterants Database USP must make the planned database comprehensible, segregating the drug/drug analog tainted products of interest to regulators from the economically motivated adulteration of interest to dietary supplement ingredient purchasers. – Confusion can arise because the adulterants database is perceived as a tool for industry, but in reality it is a tool for regulators, enforcement agencies and forensic laboratories. – Separate section on authentication would highlight the function of the database as a product and ingredient integrity tool manufacturers can use to protect themselves against Economically Motivated Adulteration. Action Item: Attendees interested in participating in beta-testing the USP database will contact Mr. Anton Bzhelyansky ([email protected]). 3 What We Heard USP Updates and Discussions—DNA-based Methods for Botanical Identification DNA testing is an emerging tool of indisputable value.
    [Show full text]
  • Adulterated Foods: What Food Service Operators Need to Know
    Adulterated Foods: What Food Service Operators Need to Know Under the New York City Health Code, food service operators cannot add substances that may be harmful to health to food. This is called adulterating food and these substances are known as adulterants. Who decides which substances are adulterants? A substance is considered an adulterant if the New York City Health Department, New York State Health Department, New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets or the U.S. Food and Drug Administration determines that adding it to food may be harmful to health. How does the Health Department enforce this part of the Health Code? During an inspection, the Health Department will check ingredients, labels and menus. If the inspector identifies adulterated food, the food may be embargoed — it will need to be discarded or returned to the supplier. Will I receive a violation if I adulterate food? Yes, you may receive a summons subject to fines, as well as violation points that count toward your letter grade. What substances are considered adulterants? There are many substances that cannot be added to food or drink. See the Food and Drug Administration’s Food Additive Status List for more information. The Health Department also recently identified these prohibited substances during inspections: ▪ Activated charcoal [Note: activated charcoal can be used as a filtration device] ▪ Cannabidiol (CBD) and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) ▪ Dietary supplements for humans or animals ▪ Liquid nitrogen* ▪ Dry ice* ▪ Kava-Kava ▪ Kratom What should I do if I am not sure whether a substance is an adulterant? If you are unsure whether you can add something to food, please call the New York City Health Department’s Office of Food Safety and Community Sanitation at 646-632-6001 or email [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Food Defense Survey & Report
    Food Defense Survey & Report Food Defense Prepared by Catherine L. Feinman Foreword by Amy Kircher December 2013 © Copyright 2013, by IMR Group, Inc. publishers of DomesticPreparedness.com, the DPJ Weekly Brief, and the DomPrep Journal; reproduction of any part of this publication without express written permission is strictly prohibited. IMR Group Inc., 517 Benfield Road, Suite 303, Severna Park, MD 21146, USA; phone: 410-518-6900; email: [email protected]; also available at www.DomPrep.com ~ This page was left blank intentionally ~ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Food, like water and air, is essential to sustain life. For the past three years, DomPrep has focused on protecting the food supply in one manner or another. Each time we achieved better results. Early this year, in a conversation with Scott Becker, executive director at the Association of Public Health Laboratories, he remarked, “If you really want to learn about food preparedness, you must go to the University of Minnesota.” He was right. This report is the result of an Insiders Roundtable held at that prestigious venue. Thank you Scott, for your important suggestion. Additionally, DomPrep’s staff Susan Collins and Catherine Feinman did a terrific job in producing this report. Catherine researched, compiled, drafted, analyzed, and edited a huge amount of content into the final product. Susan coordinated and organized the design, layout, and production. A special thank you goes to them. Select advisors from the DomPrep40 provided thought leadership, insight, and professional contacts to increase the report’s importance, credibility, and relevance to planners and policy professionals alike. A warm thank you goes to Amy Kircher, DrPH, director of the National Center for Food Protection and Defense at the University of Minnesota, Maureen Sullivan, emergency preparedness and response laboratory coordinator of the Minnesota Department of Health, and Craig W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Toxic Impact of Honey Adulteration: a Review
    foods Review The Toxic Impact of Honey Adulteration: A Review Rafieh Fakhlaei 1, Jinap Selamat 1,2,*, Alfi Khatib 3,4, Ahmad Faizal Abdull Razis 2,5 , Rashidah Sukor 2 , Syahida Ahmad 6 and Arman Amani Babadi 7 1 Food Safety and Food Integrity (FOSFI), Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; rafi[email protected] 2 Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; [email protected] (A.F.A.R.); [email protected] (R.S.) 3 Pharmacognosy Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Kulliyyah of Pharmacy, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan 25200, Pahang Darul Makmur, Malaysia; alfi[email protected] 4 Faculty of Pharmacy, Airlangga University, Surabaya 60155, Indonesia 5 Natural Medicines and Products Research Laboratory, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia 6 Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biotechnology & Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; [email protected] 7 School of Energy and Power Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +6-038-9769-1099 Received: 21 August 2020; Accepted: 11 September 2020; Published: 26 October 2020 Abstract: Honey is characterized as a natural and raw foodstuff that can be consumed not only as a sweetener but also as medicine due to its therapeutic impact on human health. It is prone to adulterants caused by humans that manipulate the quality of honey. Although honey consumption has remarkably increased in the last few years all around the world, the safety of honey is not assessed and monitored regularly.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Adulteration and Authenticity Testing Methods
    FOOD ADULTERATION AND AUTHENTICITY Food Adulteration and Authenticity Compendium Food Adulteration and Authenticity Compendium a Table of Contents Comparison of Near- and Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy for Herb and Spice Authenticity Analysis ........3 Advantages of Adulterant Screen for Detection of Olive Oil Adulteration by Attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR) FT-IR ...................................................................................7 Rapid Testing for Adulteration of Yogurt Candy using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Adulterant Screen ............................................................................................11 Use of NIR Spectroscopy and Adulterant Screen for the Detection of Common Adulterants in Milk .......................................................................................................13 Single NIR Measurement for the Detection of Adulteration and Measurement of Important Parameters in Cocoa Powders .................................................................................16 The Use of FT-IR Spectroscopy as a Technique for Verifying Maple Syrup Authenticity ....................19 APPLICATION NOTE Near- and Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy Authors: Kathryn Lawson-Wood Ian Robertson PerkinElmer, Inc. Seer Green, UK Comparison of Near- and Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy Introduction Food authenticity and adulteration testing for Herb and Spice has taken on a new level of importance with consumers and producers, after recent Authenticity Analysis food adulteration scandals. Food fraud negatively impacts
    [Show full text]