DOCSLIB.ORG

High-Fructose Corn Syrup: Health and Economic Effects

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
High-Fructose Corn Syrup: Health and Economic Effects High-Fructose Corn Syrup: Health and Economic Effects Educating Students of the Difference between HFCS and Sugar and Providing An Alternative To Regular Pepsi In Rutgers Vending Machines Tag Words: High fructose corn syrup; Obesity; Farm Bill; Corn Subsidies; Pepsi Authors: Lynn Ma and Eliza Ahmed with Julie Fagan, Ph.D Summary High fructose corn syrup (HFCS) is present in nearly every American beverage because it is a cheap substitute for the domestically high prices of cane sugar. Corn subsidies render the prices of corn byproducts like HFCS cheap, leading to its addition to many of our food products as well. Studies show that HFCS may be more detrimental than sugar, so we aim to provide the all-sugar Pepsi Throwback in our vending machines as an alternative to regular Pepsi and educate the Rutgers community about the health effects of HFCS and how it differs from sugar. The “Truth” About High-Fructose Corn Syrup Introduction High fructose corn syrup (HFCS) has lately been the focus of many nationwide television ad campaigns. Some commercials claim that it’s harmful to our health, and that consumers would do best to avoid it. Other commercials claim that it’s no different from refined sugar. This paper will attempt to reconcile these two conflicting statements and find the “truth” behind HFCS by exploring the economic and health effects of HFCS in the US. Behind the Claims (EA) The Corn Refiners Association (CRA) claims that HFCS is the same as regular sugar. After all, both are composed of roughly equal amounts of glucose and fructose. They’re both sweeteners, they’re both produced from (subsidized) crops, and they even have the same amount of calories. Despite all of these similarities, this paper will prove that HFCS is nutritionally and economically different from sugar. Recall your last trip to the grocery store. With such a variety of food available to choose from, what did you check for first? Price? Brand? Nutrition label? Chances are you did one of the three. If the only difference between two food products is whether they contain HFCS or refined sugar, then the number of calories they both have will be the same. However, it’s likely the product containing HFCS is cheaper than the one containing refined sugar. Faced with two products similar in calorie and taste, it is not unreasonable to think that the consumer would choose the lower priced one. But that choice is a short-sighted one, and fails to take into account the external cost of HFCS to health and environment. The CRA asserts that HFCS and sugar are metabolized in exactly the same way. Let’s examine this claim. Sugar--otherwise known as table sugar, beet sugar, cane sugar, or sucrose-- is made of a 1:1 ratio of glucose and fructose linked together with glycosidic bonds. This polysaccharide is digested in the small intestine, where it is broken down into equal numbers of fructose and glucose which are then absorbed into the bloodstream. High fructose corn syrup is also digested in the small intestine and made up of a mixture of fructose and glucose molecules—however, in HFCS-55 (the variation of HFCS most commonly used in sodas) there is, as the name suggests, a slightly higher proportion of fructose to glucose. Though fructose and glucose are both monosaccharides, their metabolism in the body is very different. Glucose is vital to the body as it provides the materials for synthesizing ATP via certain metabolic pathways performed in muscle tissue throughout the body. In excess, glucose is converted into glycogen and stored in the liver. On the other hand, fructose metabolism occurs almost entirely in the liver, where it is used to replenish liver glycogen and synthesize triglycerides (which are used in fat synthesis). Excess fructose consumption increases hepatic de novo lipogenesis and causes increased blood triglyceride levels, both of which are markers for obesity. Fructose also reduces insulin secretion, an important hormone that detects the level of glucose in the blood and regulates the storage of glucose, especially after meals. Insulin also triggers other hormones involved in the feeling of satiety, which means that excess fructose consumption allows people to eat more before they feel full. According to the CRA, HFCS-55 contains 55% fructose, 42% glucose, and 3% higher saccharides. The question still under debate is whether this slight difference in proportion between 50:50 and 55:42 matters. Can 5% more fructose really do so much harm to our health? Studies That Don’t Link Obesity to HFCS (LM) White (2008) certainly claims that it is not a problem. However, his assertion that the 55:42 fructose-glucose ratio results in no real increase in dietary fructose is not connected back to health or backed up by any experimental data, and seems to be based only on the fact that 55 is a number close to 50. He makes more compelling arguments later with statistical analyses. Even though recently there has been a downtick in the consumption of HFCS--no doubt due to its bad press--obesity rates are still as high as ever. The world is also by-and-large a sugar- sweetened world, and despite the fact that HFCS is not widely used in countries other than the U.S., obesity rates have increased in foreign countries as well. From this we can conclude that HFCS is not the sole contributor to the global and domestic obesity trend. This isn’t surprising. The most obvious causes for obesity are the most likely: 1) the overall increased caloric intake through higher consumption of fats and sugars and 2) decreased activity levels. We’ve already 2 established that fructose is the “bad” sugar. Frankly, every added sugar in our food products, whether it’s refined sugar, HFCS, honey, or fruit concentrate contains fructose. However, we’ve focused on HFCS because it is the main contributor of fructose in our diets due to its prevalence in soft drinks and processed foods. So while replacing HFCS with refined sugar in sodas or avoiding food products that contain it probably won’t result with an end to obesity…it’s definitely a good place to start. The studies below enforce that idea. Studies That Link Obesity to High Fructose Corn Syrup (EA & LM) There have been several studies that demonstrate that HFCS does seem to be more detrimental to health than sugar. In Bocarsly et al. (2010), experiments showed that male rats given water sweetened with HFCS (along with a standard diet of rat chow) gained more weight than male rats that were given water sweetened with table sugar (along with the standard diet). The study had both short term and long term experiments. The long-term effects of high fructose corn syrup in a six-month period were measured in weight gain, body fat, and ultimate triglyceride levels. There were two groups of rats—a control group with a standard rat chow diet and the other with a diet rich in HFCS. The latter showed various characteristic signs of metabolic syndrome, which includes abnormal weight gain, augmented fat deposition, and significant increases in circulating triglycerides. The animals consuming the high fructose corn syrup gained forty eight percent more weight than those on the normal diet. Professor Bart Hoebel, the principal investigator of the study, discussed the results of these rats: "When rats are drinking high-fructose corn syrup at levels well below those in soda pop, they're becoming obese -- every single one, across the board. Even when rats are fed a high-fat diet, you don't see this; they don't all gain extra weight." About 30% of our consumption of HFCS comes from soda alone. According to Ventura et al. (2010), it seems that these sodas contain even more fructose than the assumed 55:42 fructose-glucose ratio. A high-performance liquid chromatography of various beverages for their fructose, glucose, and sucrose levels revealed that the three most popular sodas--Coca-Cola, Sprite, and Pepsi—actually contain 64-65% fructose; not what anyone would call a near 1:1 ratio with glucose anymore. Bocarsly et al. (2010) used the standard HFCS-55 solution in their experiments and still received significant negative results in weight gain and triglyceride levels. How much worse would the rats have been if they had tested using a solution with 65% fructose? To put this fructose amount in sodas into perspective, consider the following: a 20 fl. oz. bottle of Pepsi contains 7.4 g/mL of fructose, which means that you’re drinking down around 43.7 grams of fructose per bottle. If we were eating small apples instead (weighing 100 grams each), we’d have to eat 5 apples in a row to equal that amount of fructose (Britell, 2013). Pepsi however, lacks many of the vitamins and minerals that make an apple nutritious, and most heavy soda drinkers don’t just drink one bottle a day. The Bocarsly et al. (2010) study indicates that long term consumption of HFCS results in higher adiposity and blood triglyceride levels, which are both markers for obesity. Other studies 3 observing the long term consumption of sucrose did not show such drastically negative health effects. So it seems that HFCS is indeed nutritionally different from sugar. However, the CRA refutes this study by claiming that rats are not humans. While it’s true that these rats are simply animal models, such across-the-board increases in weight gain makes it clear that there is something off about the metabolism of HFCS. So why use HFCS when it appears to be riskier to our health? Because it is cheaper than sugar.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessing Transportation Problems of the Sugar Cane Industry in Thailand
    Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific No.70, 2001 ASSESSING THE TRANSPORTATION PROBLEMS OF THE SUGAR CANE INDUSTRY IN THAILAND Paitoon Chetthamrongchai,* Aroon Auansakul** and Decha Supawan*** ABSTRACT Transportation has a fundamental role in the economic development of all countries. It is not just a means to service commuting people, but also to collect products and materials from producers and distribute them to consumers. Transportation has become a significant factor affecting the production costs of commodities. The production of sugar cane in Thailand is no exception. The cost of transporting sugar cane from the farm gate to the mills is quite high, owing to the multiple transport facilities and time-consuming activities involved in the delivery process. The total transportation expenditure was estimated at 5,708 million baht for the crop year 1999- 2000. The average cost per transaction incurred by farmers (excluding other labour costs) was in the range of 180-220 baht per ton in 1999. A large portion of this cost comprises truck rental and driver wages. These two elements together represent a high proportion of the overall production cost. The transportation issue has been overlooked in many industrial sectors and in the agricultural sector, in particular. The purpose of this paper is to present the findings of a study on the transportation and other relevant costs of sugar cane production. The findings and the subsequent recommendations could be considered for the enhancement of welfare of the sugar cane farmers and the increased efficiency of the industry in general and may also be applied to other agro- based industries facing similar problems.
    [Show full text]
  • An Economic History of the United States Sugar Program
    AN ECONOMIC HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES SUGAR PROGRAM by Tyler James Wiltgen A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Applied Economics MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana August 2007 © COPYRIGHT by Tyler James Wiltgen 2007 All Rights Reserved ii APPROVAL of a thesis submitted by Tyler James Wiltgen This thesis has been read by each member of the thesis committee and has been found to be satisfactory regarding content, English usage, format, citations, bibliographic style, and consistency, and is ready for submission to the Division of Graduate Education. Chair Vincent H. Smith Approved for the Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics Myles J. Watts Approved for the Division of Graduate Education Carl A. Fox iii STATEMENT OF PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree at Montana State University, I agree that the Library shall make it available to borrowers under rules of the Library. If I have indicated my intention to copyright this thesis by including a copyright notice page, copy is allowed for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in U.S. Copyright Law. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this thesis in whole or in parts may be granted only by the copyright holder. Tyler James Wiltgen August 2007 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am greatly indebted to Dr. Vincent Smith, my thesis committee chairman, for his guidance throughout the development of this thesis; I appreciate all of his help and support. In addition, I would like to thank the other members of the committee, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Sugar Cane Industry Overview and Energy Efficiency Considerations
    Sugar Cane Industry Overview And Energy Efficiency Considerations By Eyerusalem Birru Supervisors: Andrew Martin (Professor) Catharina Erlich (Asst. professor) Literature Survey document (Report no. 01/2016) Updated March 2016 KTH School of Industrial Engineering and Management Department of Energy Technology Division of Heat and Power Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM 2 Abstract The increase in global energy demand and environmental concerns is calling for a shift towards using renewable energy sources. Biomass is one of the renewable and carbon neutral energy sources that is being given attention. The slow process in the shift from fossil fuels to bioenergy is because of the bulky and inconvenient forms of biomass for storage and transportation. However, there is an increased interest to convert biomass into easy to handle forms of liquid and gas through the major technological conversion processes available:-thermal, thermochemical and biochemical. Sugar cane is one major feedstock for bioenergy production. This literature survey is part of a PhD project that focuses on polygeneration in sugar cane industry. The PhD project focuses on assessing the possibilities of employing the concept of polygeneration with the aim of improving the energy efficiency of the sugar mills thereby increasing the services from it. Advanced power generation systems have a big potential to be integrated into sugar cane factories and thus help generate surplus electricity. Usually, sugar mills having mechanical steam turbines have higher steam consumption due
    [Show full text]
  • Sugar Industry Secrets Exposed July 25, 2015 | by Dr. Mercola
    Brampton: 220 Wexford Road Unit 2 Brampton, ON L6Z-4N7 Ph: (905) 840-WELL Fax: (905) 840 -LIFE www.drjustineblainey.com www.blaineywellness.com Sugar Industry Secrets Exposed July 25, 2015 | By Dr. Mercola Americans have been warned for years about the dangers of eating too much fat or salt, but the media has been relatively silent about sugar, in spite of the country’s rising rates of obesity and failing health. Copious research have been published about the many ways excess sugar can damage your health, yet industry continues to defend it—science be damned. They want you to continue believing the outdated myth that saturated fat is to blame, instead of sugar. Nevertheless, the wheels of progress continue to turn. An influential group of medical researchers has been relentless in spreading the word about the strong associations between sugar consumption and the rising rates of obesity and major diseases, such as cancer, heart disease, and Alzheimer’s. This is not “news” to the food industry. They’ve actually been hiding the real science about sugar for decades—devising ways to get you even MORE addicted to their products, regardless of the consequences to your health. It’s time for everyone to know the truth about the sugar industry’s deceptions. In 2012, science journalist and author Gary Taubes partnered with Cristin Kearns Couzens to write “Big Sugar’s Sweet Little Lies.” In their exposé, featured in Mother Jones, they write: “For 40 years, the sugar industry’s priority has been to shed doubt on studies suggesting its product makes people sick.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSF the Sugar Industry the Ferritic Solution
    THE SUGAR INDUSTRY THE FERRITIC SOLUTION FERRITIC STAINLESS STEEL APPLICATIONS Foreword FERRITICS AND SUGAR “The sugar industry is a striking case where ferritic stainless steels are a clearly superior and relatively low-cost alternative to the commonly-used carbon steels. From a practical point of view, the resistance of these steels to corrosion and abrasion and their strength put them streets ahead. Then, since they contain no nickel, ferritics are price-stable and relatively inexpensive. These factors combined add up to impressive Life Cycle Cost benefi ts. “There has been a lack of information available to users and potential users of stainless steel concerning ferritic grades. ISSF therefore recently published the brochure ‘The Ferritic Solution’ and a video of the same title*. The present booklet is one of several follow-up publications on ferritics in specifi c applications. My thanks go to the International Chromium Development Association (ICDA)** for generously co-funding the booklet, as it did the two initial projects. “I am also grateful to the end-users and equipment manufacturers who have kindly allowed us to publish their testimonials about the advantages of utility ferritics in this sector. They clearly show how important it is to choose these grades when designing, installing or replacing equipment. Given the tight margins in today’s sugar industry, every saving is important and extending the life of equipment and reducing maintenance costs is an absolute priority.” *Both brochure and video are available free of charge from ISSF and can also be viewed on the ISSF website (www.worldstainless.org) and downloaded. Jürgen Fechter **ICDA website: www.icdachromium.com Chairman Marketing Development Committee ISSF International Stainless Steel Forum (ISSF) Founded in 1996, the International Stainless Steel Forum (ISSF) is a non-profi t research organisation that serves as the world forum on various aspects of the international stainless steel industry.
    [Show full text]
  • MINIMIZATION of SUCROSE LOSSES in SUGAR INDUSTRY by Ph and TEMPERATURE OPTIMIZATION
    The Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences, Vol 12, No 3 (2008): 513 - 519 MINIMIZATION OF SUCROSE LOSSES IN SUGAR INDUSTRY BY pH AND TEMPERATURE OPTIMIZATION Kornvalai Panpae 1*, Wasna Jaturonrusmee 1, Withawat Mingvanish 1 , Chantana Nuntiwattanawong 2, Surapon Chunwiset 2 , Kittisak Santudrob 1 and Siriphan Triphanpitak 1 1Department of Chemistry , Faculty of Science , King’s Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok 10140, Thailand 2Chaimongkol Refined Sugar Company, Limited.( U-Thong Factory ), Supanburi Province 72160, Thailand * Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Invert sugar has several disadvantage properties that play an important role in many food applications. It has a high affinity for water and is the cause of making products retain moisture.Invert sugar also affects the caramelization process , producing a browning effect. In this study, the possibility of minimization of sucrose inversion during the industrial production of sugar cane was investigated by the variation of the important parameters, i.e. temperature and pH of sugar cane juice for each of samples. The amounts of sucrose and reducing sugar alerting during the sucrose inversion process were determined by the values of % Pol and % reducing sugar (% RS), respectively. Starting with the study of temperature and pH effects of the sucrose solution with the concentration of 16 Brix, used as a sample model, it was found that no change in amounts of reducing sugar and sucrose was observed at room temperature (34 oC) in the pH range of 5-11. At pH 3, the amounts of reducing sugar increased and the amount of sucrose decreased as the time increased.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Name: Sugar Annual
    Required Report: Required - Public Distribution Date: April 15, 2021 Report Number: IN2021-0050 Report Name: Sugar Annual Country: India Post: New Delhi Report Category: Sugar Prepared By: Ankit Chandra, Agricultural Specialist Approved By: Mark Rosmann Report Highlights: Assuming normal rainfall and favorable weather conditions, India’s centrifugal sugar production in marketing year (MY) 2021/22 (October-September) is forecast to grow three percent to 34.7 million metric tons (MMT) (equivalent to 31.8 MMT of crystal white sugar) on a sugarcane production forecast of 389 MMT. Uttar Pradesh will continue to be the largest sugar producing state, followed by Maharashtra and Karnataka. India will retain its existing export policy that will enable subsidized exports at six MMT. Consumption is forecast to rise two percent to 28.5 MMT, as the economy recovers from the pandemic. Closing stocks are estimated at 16.5 MMT and expected to further decline as India diverts more sugar toward ethanol production to meet its domestic blending mandate. Commodities: Sugar, Centrifugal Sugar Cane for Centrifugal THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Production, Supply and Demand (PSD) Table 1. India: Centrifugal Sugar (Raw Value Basis), in Thousand Tons Sugar, Centrifugal 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 Market Year Begins Oct 2019 Oct 2020 Oct 2021 USDA USDA USDA India New Post New Post New Post Official Official Official Beginning Stocks (1000 MT) 17614 17614 14614 14614 0 15374 Beet Sugar Production (1000 MT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cane Sugar Production (1000 MT) 28900 28900 33760 33760 0 34700 Total Sugar Production (1000 MT) 28900 28900 33760 33760 0 34700 Raw Imports (1000 MT) 900 900 1000 1000 0 1000 Refined Imp.
    [Show full text]
  • When Sweet Goes Sour Confidential Documents
    WHEN SWEET GOES SOUR CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS DETAIL SUGAR INDUSTRy’s CAMPAIGN AGAINST HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP WHEN SWEET GOES SOUR CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS DETAIL SUGAR INDUSTRy’s CAMPAIGN AGAINST HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP Confidential documents obtained by the Center for Consumer Freedom indicate that the Sugar Associa- tion, Inc. (SAI) has secretly funded a campaign to demonize high fructose corn syrup in America’s war on obesity, while at the same time attempting to exonerate sugar (sucrose). This is despite the fact that the two sweeteners have nearly identical compositions and the American Medical Association says they are nutritionally equivalent. The Sugar Association’s official line is that “the sugar industry does not now sponsor, nor has it ever engaged in such a campaign,” but documents tell a different story. SAI has pursued a strategy of “science- based management” for the sugar industry’s problems, chief of which was sugar’s declining market share against high fructose corn syrup. These documents demonstrate that: • SAI quietly established an External Scientific Advisory Committee, which worked on a report SAI described as “critical to the sugar industry’s position on [high fructose corn syrup].” Accord- ing to the Committee, “fructose is the most critical nutrition issue facing the sugar industry.” • SAI’s goal was to use science-based research “in such a way that sugar is separated from the other caloric sweeteners when the obesity issues is considered by the [Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee].” • At the time, SAI developed confidentiality agreements for the ESAC members and SAI never made the Committee’s existence public.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantification of Sugar Content Loss in Various Byproducts of the Sugar Industry
    International Journal of Advance Industrial Engineering E-ISSN 2320 –5539 ©2015 INPRESSCO®, All Rights Reserved Available at http://inpressco.com/category/ijaie/ Research Article Quantification of Sugar Content Loss in various Byproducts of the Sugar Industry Chetan Sharma†* and Vikas Kumar† †Mechanical Department, National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra (Haryana), India Accepted 25 May 2015, Available online 01 June 2015, Vol.3, No.2 (June 2015) Abstract In this paper we tried to concentrate on the factors associated with the operational losses of sugar during the sugar manufacturing process. Data is collected from The Kaithal Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd. (2500 TCD) which is situated in Kaithal District of Haryana State. The major reasons of losses in sugar are due to sugar in bagasse, final molasses, filter cake and unknown factors. The sugar losses occurred in any sugar plant in a season of crushing is one of the important term of accessing the technical performance of the sugar plant. Main objective of this study is to find out various losses in operations in detail. We found after analyzing the data that the loss of sugar in bagasse, molasses, and press-mud cake and in unknown losses is 2.07% of the total cane crushed and out of the total sugar loss at The Kaithal Cooperative Sugar Mill Ltd. sugar loss in bagasse is 25.34 % while sugar loss in filter cake is 2.89 %, sugar loss in molasses is 66.94 % and sugar undetermined loss is 4.83 % respectively. Keywords: Sugar industry, Sugar cane juice. Sugar losses, Sugar manufacturing. 1. Introduction The Research method used by the researcher is descriptive type and the data collected by various 1 India is known as the true home of sugar and sources by interviewing the chief chemist of The sugarcane.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Food and Soda Versus Public Health: Industry Litigation Against Local Government Regulations to Promote Healthy Diets
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2018 Big Food and Soda Versus Public Health: Industry Litigation Against Local Government Regulations to Promote Healthy Diets Sarah A. Roache Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] Charles Platkin School of Urban Public Health, City University of New York, [email protected] Lawrence O. Gostin Georgetown University, [email protected] Cara Kaplan Fordham Law School, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/2069 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3190448 Sarah A. Roache, Charles Platkin, Lawrence O. Gostin & Cara Kaplan, Big Food and Soda Versus Public Health: Industry Litigation Against Local Government Regulations to Promote Healthy Diets, 45 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1051-1089 (2018). This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Food and Drug Law Commons, and the Health Law and Policy Commons BIG FOOD AND SODA VERSUS PUBLIC HEALTH: INDUSTRY LITIGATION AGAINST LOCAL GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS TO PROMOTE HEALTHY DIETS Sarah A. Roache,* Charles Platkin,** Lawrence O. Gostin*** & Cara Kaplan**** Introduction ........................................................................................... 1052 I. Diet-Related Chronic Diseases ..................................................... 1053 A. The Rise of Diet-Related
    [Show full text]
  • Big Corn, Big Sugar in Bitter US Row on Sweetener 17 December 2011, by Rob Lever
    Big Corn, Big Sugar in bitter US row on sweetener 17 December 2011, by Rob Lever Big Corn and Big Sugar are locked in a legal and industry is trying "to stifle free speech" and seeking public relations fight in the US over a plan to to vilify its corn products. change the name of a corn-based sweetener that has gotten a bad name. "The sugar industry is wrongfully alleging that high fructose corn syrup (a sugar made from corn) The fight began last year when Corn Refiners causes health issues that do not arise from Association, a trade association, proposed consuming cane and beet sugar," said Audrae changing the name of high-fructose corn syrup to Erickson, president of the Corn Refiners merely "corn sugar." Association. The group said the new name "more accurately "We believe that the sugar industry's views are describes this sweetener and helps clarify food misleading American consumers. The CRA will products labeling for manufacturers and continue its work to educate consumers about high consumers alike." fructose corn syrup and will vigorously oppose the sugar industry's attempt to stifle public discussion But the sugar industry argued this change would of this important health issue." be a bitter pill for US consumers and would only add to the confusion about a sweetener that has The corn industry last year petitioned the Food and drawn criticism by some health advocates. Drug Administration for permission to use the term "corn sugar" instead of high fructose corn syrup. Sugar producers have filed suit alleging the corn But in the meantime it has launched television and industry has spent $50 million in "a mass media print ads hoping to gain public support.
    [Show full text]
  • Ssbs) Excise Tax Using Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF
    An Analysis of the Role of Sugar Industry Leaders in the Formulation of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages (SSBs) Excise Tax using Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) Samantha Ching 1 Political Science Department, De La Salle University – Manila *[email protected] Abstract: This study analyzes the case of the Philippines in enacting its sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) excise tax policy through the lens of Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). To examine the dynamics among policy actors that occurred during the agenda-setting and formulation stages of the SSB tax policy, this study uses the ACF and its concepts to look into the advocacy coalitions that sought to protect their interests. This paper not only contributes to the literature on governments adopting SSB related policies, it also provides an analytic focus on the success of the local sugar industry coalition against beverage manufacturing companies in translating their beliefs into public policies. The study reinforces the complexity of the public policymaking process and its vulnerability to policy actors who, with their resources and strong political clout, were able to influence even a measure that is intended to protect public health. Key Words: sugar-sweetened beverages; excise tax; local sugar industry; advocacy coalitions; beliefs 1. INTRODUCTION the US alone, 63% and 40% of the youth and adult populations, respectively, drank SSB on a given day The approval of the Global Strategy on Diet, from 2011 to 2014 (CDC, 2017). These figures are Physical Activity, and Health by the World Health matched by the Institute of Medicine of the United Organization (WHO) in 2004 began the trend among States’ (2012) report that the leading cause of obesity governments to tax sugar-sweetened beverages and diabetes in the country is the growing (SSBs) (Nugent & Knaul, 2006).
    [Show full text]