DOCSLIB.ORG

Non-Native Marine Species in British Waters: a Review and Directory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Non-Native Marine Species in British Waters: a Review and Directory Non-native marine species in British waters: a review and directory Edited by N. Clare Eno, Robin A. Clark & William G. Sanderson Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House, City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY UK Published by JNCC, Peterborough ISBN 1 86107 442 5 © Copyright Joint Nature Conservation Committee, 1997 Non-native marine species in British waters: review Coastal counties, regions, water bodies and other major marine localities in Great Britain referred to in the text. Note. Following recent local government reorganisation, some counties and regions changed to unitary authorities with altered boundaries. 2 Non-native marine species in British waters: review Contents Summary.......................................................................................................................................................5 Part 1: Review of non-native marine species in British waters................................6 1. Scope of the study, methods and definitions employed .....................................................................6 1.1. Introduction............................................................................................................................6 1.2. Collection of information .......................................................................................................7 1.3. Definitions of introduced species ...........................................................................................7 2. The introduction of species................................................................................................................8 2.1. The species .............................................................................................................................8 Non-native marine species .....................................................................................................8 Non-established introductions..............................................................................................12 Cryptogenic species..............................................................................................................12 Vagrant species ....................................................................................................................13 Recent colonists....................................................................................................................13 2.2. Dates of introduction............................................................................................................13 2.3. Origin of non-native marine species in Britain....................................................................14 2.4. Methods of introduction .......................................................................................................14 2.5. Reasons for successful establishment...................................................................................20 2.6. Rate of spread ......................................................................................................................21 2.7. Methods and factors influencing spread, and distribution...................................................21 3. Effects of non-native species and their practical control ................................................................23 3.1. Effects on the environment ...................................................................................................23 3.2. Effects on commercial interests and beneficial effects.........................................................26 3.3. Control methods and effectiveness.......................................................................................28 4. International control of transfers of marine organisms ....................................................................29 4.1. Statutory and voluntary measures on the introduction of non-indigenous marine species ..................................................................................................................................29 4.2. Concerns and scope for future measures .............................................................................29 4.3. Legislative recommendations...............................................................................................31 5. Glossary...........................................................................................................................................32 6. References .......................................................................................................................................33 Annex 1 Questionnaire used for gathering information on non-native marine species. ..............................37 Part 2: Directory of non-native marine species in British waters...................39 Flora ......................................................................................................................40 Bacillariophyta............................................................................................................................................40 Thalassiosira punctigera ..................................................................................................................40 Thalassiosira tealata.........................................................................................................................42 Coscinodiscus wailesii.....................................................................................................................44 Odontella sinensis............................................................................................................................46 Pleurosigma simonsenii ...................................................................................................................48 Rhodophyta.................................................................................................................................................50 Asparagopsis armata........................................................................................................................50 Bonnemaisonia hamifera .................................................................................................................52 Grateloupia doryphora.....................................................................................................................54 Grateloupia filicina var. luxurians ...................................................................................................56 Pikea californica ..............................................................................................................................58 Agardhiella subulata ........................................................................................................................60 Solieria chordalis.............................................................................................................................62 Antithamnionella spirographidis......................................................................................................64 Antithamnionella ternifolia..............................................................................................................66 3 Non-native marine species in British waters: review Polysiphonia harveyi........................................................................................................................68 Chromophyta...............................................................................................................................................70 Colpomenia peregrina......................................................................................................................70 Undaria pinnatifida ..........................................................................................................................72 Sargassum muticum.........................................................................................................................75 Chlorophyta ................................................................................................................................................78 Codium fragile subsp. atlanticum ....................................................................................................78 Codium fragile subsp. tomentosoides ..............................................................................................80 Plantae ........................................................................................................................................................82 Spartina anglica ...............................................................................................................................82 Fauna ......................................................................................................................................................85 Cnidaria.......................................................................................................................................................85 Gonionemus vertens ........................................................................................................................85 Clavopsella navis.............................................................................................................................87 Haliplanella lineata ..........................................................................................................................89 Nematoda....................................................................................................................................................91
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Monitoring Program for Biodiversity and Non-Indigenous Species in Egypt
    UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTRE FOR SPECIALLY PROTECTED AREAS National monitoring program for biodiversity and non-indigenous species in Egypt PROF. MOUSTAFA M. FOUDA April 2017 1 Study required and financed by: Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas Boulevard du Leader Yasser Arafat BP 337 1080 Tunis Cedex – Tunisie Responsible of the study: Mehdi Aissi, EcApMEDII Programme officer In charge of the study: Prof. Moustafa M. Fouda Mr. Mohamed Said Abdelwarith Mr. Mahmoud Fawzy Kamel Ministry of Environment, Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA) With the participation of: Name, qualification and original institution of all the participants in the study (field mission or participation of national institutions) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS page Acknowledgements 4 Preamble 5 Chapter 1: Introduction 9 Chapter 2: Institutional and regulatory aspects 40 Chapter 3: Scientific Aspects 49 Chapter 4: Development of monitoring program 59 Chapter 5: Existing Monitoring Program in Egypt 91 1. Monitoring program for habitat mapping 103 2. Marine MAMMALS monitoring program 109 3. Marine Turtles Monitoring Program 115 4. Monitoring Program for Seabirds 118 5. Non-Indigenous Species Monitoring Program 123 Chapter 6: Implementation / Operational Plan 131 Selected References 133 Annexes 143 3 AKNOWLEGEMENTS We would like to thank RAC/ SPA and EU for providing financial and technical assistances to prepare this monitoring programme. The preparation of this programme was the result of several contacts and interviews with many stakeholders from Government, research institutions, NGOs and fishermen. The author would like to express thanks to all for their support. In addition; we would like to acknowledge all participants who attended the workshop and represented the following institutions: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Distribution of 'Gonionemus Vertens' A
    ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF ’GONIONEMUS VERTENS’ A. AGASSIZ (HYDROZOA, LIMNOMEDUSAE), A NEW SPECIES IN THE EELGRASS BEDS OF LAKE GREVELINGEN (S.W. NETHERLANDS) * C. BAKKER (Delta Institute fo r Hydrobiological Research, Yerseke, The Netherlands). INTRODUCTION The ecosystem of Lake Grevelingen, a closed sea arm in the Delta area o f the S.W.-Netherlands is studied by the Delta Institute fo r Hydrobiological Research. Average depth o f the lake (surface area : 108 km2; volume : 575.10^ m^) is small (5.3 m), as extended shallows occur, especially along the north-eastern shore. Since the closure of the original sea arm (1971), the shallow areas were gradually covered by a dense vegetation o f eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) during summer. Fig. 1. shows the distribution and cover percentages of Zostera in the lake during the summer of 1978. The beds serve as a sheltered biotope fo r several animals. The epifauna o f Zostera, notably amphipods and isopods, represent a valuable source o f food fo r small litto ra l pelagic species, such as sticklebacks and atherinid fish. The sheltered habitat is especially important for animals sensitive to strong wind-driven turbulence. From 1976 onwards the medusa o f Gonionemus vertens A. Agassiz is frequently found w ith in the eelgrass beds. The extension o f the Zostera vegetation has evidently created enlarged possibilities for the development o f the medusa (BAKKER , 1978). Several medusae were collected since 1976 during the diving-, dredging- and other sampling activities of collaborators of the Institute. In the course of the summer of 1980 approximately 40 live specimens were transferred into aquaria in the Institute and kept alive fo r months.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Tales
    Metabarcoding reveals different zooplankton communities in northern and southern areas of the North Sea Jan Niklas Macher, Berry B. van der Hoorn, Katja T. C. A. Peijnenburg, Lodewijk van Walraven, Willem Renema Supplementary tables 1-5 Table S1: Sampling stations and recorded abiotic variables recorded during the NICO 10 expedition from the Dutch Coast to the Shetland Islands Sampling site name Coordinates (°N, °E) Mean remperature (°C) Mean salinity (PSU) Depth (m) S74 59.416510, 0.499900 8.2 35.1 134 S37 58.1855556, 0.5016667 8.7 35.1 89 S93 57.36046, 0.57784 7.8 34.8 84 S22 56.5866667, 0.6905556 8.3 34.9 220 S109 56.06489, 1.59652 8.7 35 79 S130 55.62157, 2.38651 7.8 34.8 73 S156 54.88581, 3.69192 8.3 34.6 41 S176 54.41489, 4.04154 9.6 34.6 43 S203 53.76851, 4.76715 11.8 34.5 34 Table S2: Species list and read number per sampling site Class Order Family Genus Species S22 S37 S74 S93 S109 S130 S156 S176 S203 Copepoda Calanoida Acartiidae Acartia Acartia clausi 0 0 0 72 0 170 15 630 3995 Copepoda Calanoida Acartiidae Acartia Acartia tonsa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Hydrozoa Trachymedusae Rhopalonematidae Aglantha Aglantha digitale 0 0 0 0 1870 117 420 629 0 Actinopterygii Trachiniformes Ammodytidae Ammodytes Ammodytes marinus 0 0 0 0 0 263 0 35 0 Copepoda Harpacticoida Miraciidae Amphiascopsis Amphiascopsis cinctus 344 0 0 992 2477 2500 9574 8947 0 Ophiuroidea Amphilepidida Amphiuridae Amphiura Amphiura filiformis 0 0 0 0 219 0 0 1470 63233 Copepoda Calanoida Pontellidae Anomalocera Anomalocera patersoni 0 0 586 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bivalvia Venerida
    [Show full text]
  • New Insights in the Biogeographical Distributions of Two Spionidae (Annelida) from the NE Atlantic and Mediterranean French Coasts
    Zoosymposia 19: 173–184 (2020) ISSN 1178-9905 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zs ZOOSYMPOSIA Copyright © 2020 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1178-9913 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zoosymposia.19.1.18 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7CF4D06E-47F9-48C5-9703-5CECFD9C1491 New insights in the biogeographical distributions of two Spionidae (Annelida) from the NE Atlantic and Mediterranean French coasts JÉRÔME JOURDE1,5*, NICOLAS LAVESQUE2,7, CÉLINE LABRUNE3,10, JEAN-MICHEL AMOUR- OUX3,12, PAULO BONIFÁCIO3,11, SUZIE HUMBERT2,8, BASTIEN LAMARQUE2,9, PIERRE-GUY SAURIAU1,6 & KARIN MEIßNER4,13 1La Rochelle Université, CNRS, UMR 7266 LIENSs, 2 rue Olympe de Gouges 17000 La Rochelle, France 2Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, UMR 5805 EPOC, Station Marine d’Arcachon, 2 rue du Professeur Jolyet, 33120 Arcachon, France 3Sorbonne Université, CNRS, UMR LECOB 8222, Laboratoire d’Ecogéochimie des Environnements Benthiques, Observatoire Océanologique de Banyuls, Avenue Pierre Fabre, 66650 Banyuls-sur-Mer, France 4Senckenberg Forschungsinstitute und Naturmuseen (SFN), Deutsches Zentrum für Marine Biodiversitätsforschung, Biozentrum Grindel, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany 5 [email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7260-8419 6 [email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5360-8728 7 [email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5701-2393 8 [email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4254-3567 9 [email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1418-9049 10 [email protected],
    [Show full text]
  • Dancing Jelly Sh
    Dancing Jellysh Xiaohuan Corina Wang Septemb er Intro duction Jellysh are lovely creatures In the Seattle Aquarium I have seen their soft translucent b o dies dancing elegantly in a darklit tank It was as fascinating as watching a ballet p erformance Designing a jellysh mo del and teaching it how to lo comote are eorts to recreate the jellyshs natural graceful movement Mo deling live creatures and animating their movements have b een long studied Two broad categories of techniques include traditional animation and physicsbased animation Traditional animation uses keyframing where the animator has to repro duce an animals p oses at eachpoint along the time line Although this metho d lets the animators imagination y it is timeconsuming to create the animated sequences and these sequences are usually not reusable Physicsbased animation op ens up a new approach for creating animal motion Applying this technique the animator is able to assign the mo deled creature similar physical structures as those of its live counterpart Moreover the interaction b etween the real creature and its environment is mo deled and simulated Both the internal and external forces that a real animal exp eriences during its motion are applied to its mo del This greatly automate the animation pro cess In short physicsbased animation provides interactive automation to the animated creature instead of manually regenerating the app earance of the animal in sequence as done in the traditional animation Using physicsbased animation to achieve realistic motion the real
    [Show full text]
  • Eggs of the Copepod Acartia Tonsa Dana Require Hypoxic Conditions to Tolerate Prolonged Embryonic Development Arrest Tue Sparholt Jørgensen1,2*, Per Meyer Jepsen1, H
    Jørgensen et al. BMC Ecol (2019) 19:1 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-018-0217-5 BMC Ecology RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Eggs of the copepod Acartia tonsa Dana require hypoxic conditions to tolerate prolonged embryonic development arrest Tue Sparholt Jørgensen1,2*, Per Meyer Jepsen1, H. Cecilie B. Petersen1, Dennis Steven Friis1 and Benni Winding Hansen1* Abstract Background: Copepods make up the largest zooplankton biomass in coastal areas and estuaries and are pivotal for the normal development of fsh larva of countless species. During spring in neritic boreal waters, the copepod pelagic biomass increases rapidly from near absence during winter. In the calanoid species Acartia tonsa, a small fraction of eggs are dormant regardless of external conditions and this has been hypothesized to be crucial for sediment egg banks and for the rapid biomass increase during spring. Other eggs can enter a state of induced arrest called quies- cence when external conditions are unfavourable. While temperature is known to be a pivotal factor in the transition from developing to resting eggs and back, the role of pH and free Oxygen in embryo development has not been systematically investigated. Results: Here, we show in a laboratory setting that hypoxic conditions are necessary for resting eggs to maintain a near-intact rate of survival after several months of induced resting. We further investigate the infuence of pH that is realistic for natural sediments on the viability of resting eggs and document the efect that eggs have on the pH of the surrounding environment. We fnd that resting eggs acidify their immediate surroundings and are able to survive in a wide range of pH.
    [Show full text]
  • Successions of Phytobenthos Species in a Mediterranean Transitional Water System: the Importance of Long Term Observations
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal Nature ConservationSuccessions 34: 217–246 of phytobenthos (2019) species in a Mediterranean transitional water system... 217 doi: 10.3897/natureconservation.34.30055 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://natureconservation.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity conservation Successions of phytobenthos species in a Mediterranean transitional water system: the importance of long term observations Antonella Petrocelli1, Ester Cecere1, Fernando Rubino1 1 Water Research Institute (IRSA) – CNR, via Roma 3, 74123 Taranto, Italy Corresponding author: Antonella Petrocelli ([email protected]) Academic editor: A. Lugliè | Received 25 September 2018 | Accepted 28 February 2019 | Published 3 May 2019 http://zoobank.org/5D4206FB-8C06-49C8-9549-F08497EAA296 Citation: Petrocelli A, Cecere E, Rubino F (2019) Successions of phytobenthos species in a Mediterranean transitional water system: the importance of long term observations. In: Mazzocchi MG, Capotondi L, Freppaz M, Lugliè A, Campanaro A (Eds) Italian Long-Term Ecological Research for understanding ecosystem diversity and functioning. Case studies from aquatic, terrestrial and transitional domains. Nature Conservation 34: 217–246. https://doi.org/10.3897/ natureconservation.34.30055 Abstract The availability of quantitative long term datasets on the phytobenthic assemblages of the Mar Piccolo of Taranto (southern Italy, Mediterranean Sea), a lagoon like semi-enclosed coastal basin included in the Italian LTER network, enabled careful analysis of changes occurring in the structure of the community over about thirty years. The total number of taxa differed over the years. Thirteen non-indigenous species in total were found, their number varied over the years, reaching its highest value in 2017. The dominant taxa differed over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • BROWN ALGAE [147 Species] (
    CHECKLIST of the SEAWEEDS OF IRELAND: BROWN ALGAE [147 species] (http://seaweed.ucg.ie/Ireland/Check-listPhIre.html) PHAEOPHYTA: PHAEOPHYCEAE ECTOCARPALES Ectocarpaceae Acinetospora Bornet Acinetospora crinita (Carmichael ex Harvey) Kornmann Dichosporangium Hauck Dichosporangium chordariae Wollny Ectocarpus Lyngbye Ectocarpus fasciculatus Harvey Ectocarpus siliculosus (Dillwyn) Lyngbye Feldmannia Hamel Feldmannia globifera (Kützing) Hamel Feldmannia simplex (P Crouan et H Crouan) Hamel Hincksia J E Gray - Formerly Giffordia; see Silva in Silva et al. (1987) Hincksia granulosa (J E Smith) P C Silva - Synonym: Giffordia granulosa (J E Smith) Hamel Hincksia hincksiae (Harvey) P C Silva - Synonym: Giffordia hincksiae (Harvey) Hamel Hincksia mitchelliae (Harvey) P C Silva - Synonym: Giffordia mitchelliae (Harvey) Hamel Hincksia ovata (Kjellman) P C Silva - Synonym: Giffordia ovata (Kjellman) Kylin - See Morton (1994, p.32) Hincksia sandriana (Zanardini) P C Silva - Synonym: Giffordia sandriana (Zanardini) Hamel - Only known from Co. Down; see Morton (1994, p.32) Hincksia secunda (Kützing) P C Silva - Synonym: Giffordia secunda (Kützing) Batters Herponema J Agardh Herponema solitarium (Sauvageau) Hamel Herponema velutinum (Greville) J Agardh Kuetzingiella Kornmann Kuetzingiella battersii (Bornet) Kornmann Kuetzingiella holmesii (Batters) Russell Laminariocolax Kylin Laminariocolax tomentosoides (Farlow) Kylin Mikrosyphar Kuckuck Mikrosyphar polysiphoniae Kuckuck Mikrosyphar porphyrae Kuckuck Phaeostroma Kuckuck Phaeostroma pustulosum Kuckuck
    [Show full text]
  • Characterising Biofouling Communities on Mussel Farms Along an Environmental Gradient: a Step Towards Improved Risk Management
    Vol. 8: 15–30, 2015 AQUACULTURE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS Published online December 14 doi: 10.3354/aei00159 Aquacult Environ Interact OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Characterising biofouling communities on mussel farms along an environmental gradient: a step towards improved risk management A. M. Watts1,2,3,*, S. J. Goldstien1, G. A. Hopkins2 1School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand 2Coastal and Freshwater Group, Cawthron Institute, Nelson 7010, New Zealand 3Present address: National Institute of Water and Atmosphere (NIWA), 217 Akersten Street, Port Nelson, Nelson 7010, New Zealand ABSTRACT: Biofouling pests can have significant economic impacts on aquaculture operations, including increased processing and production costs. An important first step towards improved biofouling management is understanding the density and distribution of the biofouling species within a growing region. In this study, biofouling communities were sampled from 73 commercial mussel farms within New Zealand’s main mussel growing region, Pelorus Sound. At each farm, photoquadrats (0.08 m2, n = 6) of biofouling organisms were obtained at 2 depth ranges (3 per range) from suspended long-line droppers, both at the surface (0 to 3 m of the dropper) and bottom (9 to 24 m, depending on dropper length and water depth). Biomass samples and visual estimates of biofouling biomass were also obtained. Strong spatial variation in the structure of biofouling communities was evident, with increasing dissimilarity between communities along Pelorus Sound. Problematic taxa (e.g. the brown alga Undaria pinnatifida and calcareous tubeworm Pomatoceros sp.) were dominant near the entrance to the Sound, where annual temperature cycles are often reduced and salinity concentrations are higher.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropogenic Effects on the Fouling Community: Impacts of Biological Invasions and Anthropogenic Structures on Community Structure
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses Summer 8-10-2017 Anthropogenic Effects on the Fouling Community: Impacts of Biological Invasions and Anthropogenic Structures on Community Structure Whitney Elizabeth McClees Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons, and the Marine Biology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation McClees, Whitney Elizabeth, "Anthropogenic Effects on the Fouling Community: Impacts of Biological Invasions and Anthropogenic Structures on Community Structure" (2017). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 3883. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.5771 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Anthropogenic Effects on the Fouling Community: Impacts of Biological Invasions and Anthropogenic Structures on Community Structure by Whitney Elizabeth McClees A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science in Environmental Science and Management Thesis Committee: Catherine de Rivera, Chair Sarah Eppley Gregory Ruiz Portland State University 2017 © 2017 Whitney Elizabeth McClees Abstract Coastal anthropogenic infrastructure has significantly modified nearshore environments. Because these structures often have a strong association with shipping as would be found in ports and harbors, they have been identified as invasion hotspots. Due to propagule pressure from shipping and recreational boating and suitable uncolonized substrate that provides a refuge from native predators, a greater number of non-native species have been found on these structures compared to nearby natural substrate.
    [Show full text]
  • Fecundity and Survival of the Calanoid Copepod <I>Acartia Tonsa
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Master's Theses Spring 5-2007 Fecundity and Survival of the Calanoid Copepod Acartia tonsa Fed Isochrysis galeana (Tahitian Strain) and Chaetoceros mulleri Angelos Apeitos University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Apeitos, Angelos, "Fecundity and Survival of the Calanoid Copepod Acartia tonsa Fed Isochrysis galeana (Tahitian Strain) and Chaetoceros mulleri" (2007). Master's Theses. 276. https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/276 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Southern Mississippi FECUNDITY AND SURVIVAL OF THE CALANOID COPEPOD ACARTIA TONSA FED ISOCHRYSIS GALEANA (TAHITIAN STRAIN) AND CHAETOCEROS MULLER! by Angelos Apeitos A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Studies Office of the University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science May2007 ABS1RACT FECUNDITY AND SURVIVAL OF THE CALANOID COPEPOD ACARTIA TONSA FED ISOCHRYSIS GALEANA (TAHITIAN STRAIN) AND CHAETOCEROS MULLER! Historically, red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) larviculture at the Gulf Coast Research Lab (GCRL) used 25 ppt artificial salt water and mixed, wild zooplankton composed primarily of Acartia tonsa, a calanoid copepod. Acartia tonsa was collected from the estuarine waters of Davis Bayou and bloomed in outdoor tanks from which it was harvested and fed to red sapper larvae.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Population Dynamics of Placida Dendritica and Codium Fragile in the Gulf of Maine and a Theoretical Discussion of Invasive Species
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Winter 2020 ANALYSIS OF THE POPULATION DYNAMICS OF PLACIDA DENDRITICA AND CODIUM FRAGILE IN THE GULF OF MAINE AND A THEORETICAL DISCUSSION OF INVASIVE SPECIES Seth Goodnight University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation Goodnight, Seth, "ANALYSIS OF THE POPULATION DYNAMICS OF PLACIDA DENDRITICA AND CODIUM FRAGILE IN THE GULF OF MAINE AND A THEORETICAL DISCUSSION OF INVASIVE SPECIES" (2020). Doctoral Dissertations. 2546. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/2546 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANALYSIS OF THE POPULATION DYNAMICS OF PLACIDA DENDRITICA AND CODIUM FRAGILE IN THE GULF OF MAINE AND A THEORETICAL DISCUSSION OF INVASIVE SPECIES BY SETH GOODNIGHT B.A.: Biology and Chemistry – University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, 2006 M.S.: Zoology – University of New Hampshire, 2012 DISSERTATION Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Biological Sciences: Marine Biology Option December 2020 ii This thesis/dissertation was examined and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biological Sciences: Marine Biology Option by: Dissertation Director: Larry G. Harris Ph.D. Professor Emeritus, Biological Sciences. University of New Hampshire Dissertation Committee: Jessica A.
    [Show full text]