SUMMARY of KEY STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS and INDICATION of BROAD COMMUNITY SUPPORT Broad Support No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SUMMARY of KEY STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS and INDICATION of BROAD COMMUNITY SUPPORT Broad Support No SUMMARY OF KEY STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS AND INDICATION OF BROAD COMMUNITY SUPPORT Broad support No. Date Place Topic & issues raised Outcomes obtained? (Y/N) 1. June Key informant Meetings with the following to inform the design: Provided information on ongoing Y 2010 interviews, Chairman Chittagong Hill Tracts Regional Council and past interventions, what Bandarban, (CHTRC), Deputy Commissioners (Bandarban, works, what is still needed. Need Khagrachari, Khagrachari), CHT Hill District Councils [HDCs] to have support for further Rangamati (Bandarban, Khagrachari, Rangamati), Local infrastructure development. Government Engineering Department [LGED] (Bandarban, Khagrachari, Rangamati), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP); Danish International Rural Development Project Second Chittagong Tracts Hill Development Agency (DANIDA); nongovernment organizations [NGOs] (including Eco Devt.) 2. June Digholchari, Get input from village communities of several Overwhelming community support Y 2010 Bonojogichara, indigenous peoples (IP) groups on project design and for roads and many ideas Wagga, Dewan ideas for needed interventions, broad community generated for appropriate Para, Juiggyachola, consent over a period of 10 days field visits to villages community infrastructure and Monglapara, in all 3 districts. other desired support. Kanajupara, Rang Suggestions for implementation Lai, Bethlehem, Kara arrangements. para, Antaha para, Chemi Dulu para, Tripura para, Chitta Ranjan Karbari para, 3. July Rangamati Inception workshop including key stakeholders from all Many suggestions on method of Y 2010 3 districts including over 50 representatives from implementation. Infrastructure executing agency (EA), implementing agencies (IAs), requirements and overall high HDCs, Circle Chiefs, NGOs, civil service organizations support for project. (CSOs) etc. Discuss project design process, initial results, way forward and project safeguards. (RRP 4. Aug - Bandarban, Socioeconomic survey (SES) of 60 villages for baseline See detailed SES report. Land Y Sep Khagrachari, social mapping information tenurity is a minor. Key constraint BAN 2010 Rangamati for improved livelihoods is access to markets and transport + skills. 42248 5. 31 Aug Rangamati Design and monitoring framework (DMF) Workshop Problems and issues affecting Y 2010 involving representatives from key stakeholder groups CHT were identified from the ) 2 (IP communities represented by NGOs; officials from perspectives of communities who LGED and Ministry of CHT Affairs [MOCHTA] (Dhaka live there, government agencies and CHT); HDCs; UNDP; etc), the project management who work in the region, and non- office (PMO) and consultants. This was the first of government organizations. several attempts to actively involve various interest groups in the project design work. The participants were allowed the opportunity to present their institutional agenda, or for those representing groups that have been affected in the past, their aspirations for the second phase of CHT Rural Development Project (CHTRDP). There was only enough time for group and plenary discussions to identify problems and issues, and consolidate to prepare initial problem tree analysis, but the workshop demonstrated the value of group dynamics in tackling issues, and providing space to voice out individual concerns and aspirations. 6. Aug Due diligence visits Jhagrabil-Rangamati via Baradam Upazila Road of Widespread unresolved issues Y 2010 to CHTRDP1 roads Upazila Rangamati Sadar and Kaptai and Rangamati uncovered resulting from lack of Districts transparent procedures for land Kawkhali H/Q-Ghagra Bazar Upazila Road of Kawkhal acquisition in previous project. Upazila, Rangamati District Rigorous method for rectifying provided to ADB Bangladesh Wagga Junior High School to Sapchari Union Road, Resident Mission (BRM) for Kaptai Upazila, Rangamati District implementation. Lessons learned Manikchari - Rajbari - Juiggyachola Bazar Union (Rural) incorporated into preparation of Road, Manichari Upazila, Kagrachari District, and Land Acquisition and Hansamapara - Bagmara -Antapara - Rajosthali Bodar Resettlement Framework (LARF) Upazila Road, in Bandarban Sadar and Rowangchari for this project and discussed with Upazilas, Bandarban District key project stakeholders. 7. Sept Rangamati Midterm workshop including key stakeholders from all 3 Continued debate over project Y 2010 districts including over 50 representatives from EA, IAs, components, implementation HDCs, Circle Chiefs, NGOs, CSOs, government line arrangements, agreement with departments (women‟s affairs, environment, agriculture, arrangements for land acquisition fisheries, health), mouza headmen, upazila chairmen, compensation. etc. Discuss likely project content and impacts including project safeguards. 8. Sept - Rangamati Consultations with CHTRC, LGED, HDC, Upazila and Long list of 264 km of rural rods Y Dec union representatives and project preparatory technical (union and upazila) identified for 2010 assistance (PPTA) consultants on long list of roads to upgrading under the Project. This be upgraded under the Project. CHTRC taking lead on is the definitive list from which all establishing selection criteria. roads to be selected with any deviations being prior agreed with CHTRC. List is agreed to by all stakeholders including MOCHTA and is incorporated in project administration manual (PAM). 9. Sept - Rangamati Coordination Meetings and Thematic Presentations on The thematic presentations and Y Dec key areas of the project design. This was carried out on provided opportunities to validate 2010 an almost weekly basis with consultants presenting findings from the field and desk their findings from the field work and desk studies and studies and to draw initial the progress of design work in their particular thematic responses to the emerging design areas to a more or less permanent group comprising considerations for the various CHT stakeholders represented by the LGED, CHTRC, components. The discussions HDC focal persons and the PPTA team. The meetings often led to divergent perspectives were often contentious given the overlapping and on the focus and scope of the sometimes conflicting interests of the different groups of project, however it had been stakeholders represented. particularly useful in bringing out the key expectations and biases of key stakeholders and to put in place a process for finding a common ground for the project design work. 10. Dec Rangamati Midterm workshop including key stakeholders from all 3 Presentation of the final project Y 2010 districts including over 50 representatives from EA, IAs, design, its components and HDCs, Circle Chiefs, NGOs, CSOs, government line implementation arrangements. departments (women‟s affairs, environment, agriculture, Broad consent for project however fisheries, health), mouza headmen, upazila chairmen, some last minute requests for etc. Discuss likely project content and impacts including more increasing components and project safeguards. allocation of additional finances, etc. 11. Feb Rupashi Bazar, Consultations with communities and in particular Several questions were raised and Y 2011 Lama, Bandarban, resettlement and land acquisition affected people along answered, see consultation record Panijhiri Para, the proposed Panijhiri Para to Chingkum Para road. In attached. The community was Chaikhang Union, conjunction with the preparation of the land acquisition very supportive of the proposed Alikadam Upazila, and resettlement plan (LARP), ADB consultants road. Bandarban explained the impacts and entitlements of affected people, and sought broad community support for the subproject. 3 4 12. Mar Rangamati ADB fact-finding mission to draw together all aspects of CHTRC were keen on less roads Y 2011 the project and seek agreement on the final project and more community design. development. Rationale for roads as catalyst for other (community) development activities was once again explained in detail. Consensus reached on design and way forward. 13. Mar Uttar Shantipur, and Consultations with communities and in particular Several questions were raised and Y 2011 Baurapar, resettlement and land acquisition affected people along answered, See consultation record Panchhari. the proposed Panchhari growth centre to Bhaibonsora attached. The community was Khagrachhari. growth centre road. In conjunction with the preparation very supportive of the proposed of the LARP, ADB consultants explained the impacts road. and entitlements of affected people, and sought broad community support for the subproject. 14. Mar Chaingkhong Consultations with communities and in particular Several questions were raised and Y 2011 Mukhpara,and resettlement and land acquisition affected people along answered, See consultation record Moipara, Rajostholi, the proposed Poaito (RHD)-Zimrong-Chaingkhong attached. The community was Rangamati Mukhpara road. In conjunction with the preparation of very supportive of the proposed the LARP, ADB consultants explained the impacts and road. entitlements of affected people, and sought broad community support for the subproject. 5 DETAILS OF CONSULTATIONS Introductory Meeting of TA 7432-BAN: Second CHT Rural Development Project (CHTRDP-II) Venue: TA Office Conference Room Date: 2 June 2010 / Time: 9:30 AM List of the attendees Main Points of Discussion 1. Ms. Yasmin Siddiqi, Mission leader, ADB, Philippines 1. Welcome address by Ms. Siddiqi 2. Ms. Marlene Fuentes, CEO, ANZDEC, New Zealand and then the meeting
Recommended publications
  • Good Practices and Innovations in Implementing Rio Conventions in Bangladesh
    Report on Good Practices and Innovations of Rio Conventions in Bangladesh GOOD PRACTICES AND INNOVATIONS IN IMPLEMENTING RIO CONVENTIONS IN BANGLADESH 1 Report on Good Practices and Innovations of Rio Conventions in Bangladesh The entire effort in producing this document was coordinated by the Rio project. © 2019 Department of Environment, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes are prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Department of Environment, 2019. Good Practices and Innovations in Implementing Rio Conventions in Bangladesh, Department of Environment, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Available from: Department of Environment Paribesh Bhaban E/16, Agargaon, Sher-e Bangla Nagar Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh www.rio.doe.gov.bd Contributor Dr. Md. Khairul Alam Dr. Md. Golam Mahabub Sarwar M Hafijul Islam Khan Suriya Ferdous Editorial Guidance Md. Ziaul Haque Abu Mostafa Kamal Uddin Md. Shamsuddoha A S Moniruzzaman Khan 2 Report on Good Practices and Innovations of Rio Conventions in Bangladesh FOREWORD The three Rio Conventions on biodiversity, climate change and desertification and land degradation contribute to the sustainable development goals. Each instrument is intrinsically linked, and is operating in the same ecosystems and addressing interdependent issues of environment at global and national levels. Bangladesh signed and ratified the Rio Conventions during 1992-1996. The commitments made under the Conventions for sustaining environmental growth of the country has turned into the tools of balancing environment and development.
    [Show full text]
  • IPP: Bangladesh: Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project
    Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project (RRP BAN 42248) Indigenous Peoples Plan March 2011 BAN: Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project Prepared by ANZDEC Ltd for the Ministry of Chittagong Hill Tracts Affairs and Asian Development Bank. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 16 March 2011) Currency unit – taka (Tk) Tk1.00 = $0.0140 $1.00 = Tk71.56 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank ADR – alternative dispute resolution AP – affected person CHT – Chittagong Hill Tracts CHTDF – Chittagong Hill Tracts Development Facility CHTRC – Chittagong Hill Tracts Regional Council CHTRDP – Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project CI – community infrastructure DC – deputy commissioner DPMO – district project management office GOB – Government of Bangladesh GPS – global positioning system GRC – grievance redress committee HDC – hill district council INGO – implementing NGO IP – indigenous people IPP – indigenous peoples plan LARF – land acquisition and resettlement framework LCS – labor contracting society LGED – Local Government Engineering Department MAD – micro agribusiness development MIS – management information system MOCHTA – Ministry of Chittagong Hill Tracts Affairs NOTE (i) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. This indigenous peoples plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. 1 CONTENTS Page A. Executive Summary 3 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Bangladesh Needs Assessment Working Group (NAWG) Report on Landslides
    Bangladesh Needs Assessment Working Group (NAWG) Report on Landslides Landslides, Bangladesh, June 2017 Report date: 19 June 2017 (Source: UNICEF) Md. Yousuf Ali, Director-MIM, DDM, Email: [email protected] Contact for Inquiries: Arshad Muhammad, Assistant Country Director – Programs , CARE, Email: [email protected] Landslides, Bangladesh June 2017 Contents Contents 2 Background 3 Key Findings 4 Context of the Affected Area 6 Key characteristics of the affected districts by the landslides 8 Situation Overview 10 Detailed Findings 15 Access and Infrastructure 15 Communication 16 Child Protection 18 Education 19 Food Security 20 Livelihoods and Income 20 Gender Based Violence 21 Gender 23 Health 23 Market 25 Nutrition 26 Shelter 27 Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) 28 Annex A: Affected people per Upazila 30 2 Landslides, Bangladesh June 2017 Background On June 13th the districts of Bandarban, Chittagong, Rangamati, Khagrachari and Cox’s Bazaar suffered from possibly the deadliest landslides in their history. The disaster killed an estimated 160 persons, including 115 persons in Rangamati alone. According to the Chittagong Divisional Health Office Control Room Report, a total of 187 injured persons were admitted in local level hospitals. Approximately 85% of patients were admitted in Rangamati. While landslide related disaster occurs nearly every year, the second highest death toll of 127 deceased persons was recorded in 2007 [Disaster Forum, June 2017]. Monsoon rains caused severe flooding in low-lying areas to significantly damage road and communication infrastructure. Flood water rendered remote communities in Bandarban, Chittagong, and Rangamati districts were inaccessible by road. On June 14th, mudslides in southeast Bangladesh claimed additional lives in Cox's Bazaar and Khagrachari districts to further damage homes and infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • HRSS Annual Bulletin 2018
    Human Rights in Bangladesh Annual Bulletin 2018 HUMAN RIGHTS SUPPORT SOCIETY (HRSS) www.hrssbd.org Annual Human Rights Bulletin Bangladesh Situation 2018 HRSS Any materials published in this Bulletin May be reproduced with acknowledgment of HRSS. Published by Human Rights Support Society D-3, 3rd Floor, Nurjehan Tower 2nd Link Road, Banglamotor Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh. Email: [email protected], [email protected] Website: www.hrssbd.org Cover & Graphics [email protected] Published in September 2019 Price: TK 300 US$ 20 ISSN-2413-5445 BOARD of EDITORS Advisor Barrister Shahjada Al Amin Kabir Md. Nur Khan Editor Nazmul Hasan Sub Editor Ijajul Islam Executive Editors Research & Publication Advocacy & Networking Md. Omar Farok Md. Imamul Hossain Monitoring & Documentation Investigation & Fact findings Aziz Aktar Md. Saiful Islam Ast. IT Officer Rizwanul Haq Acknowledgments e are glad to announce that HRSS is going to publish “Annual Human Rights Bulletin 2018”, focusing on Wsignificant human rights violations of Bangladesh. We hope that the contents of this report will help the people understand the overall human rights situation in the country. We further expect that both government and non-government stakeholders working for human rights would be acquainted with the updated human rights conditions and take necessary steps to stop repeated offences. On the other hand, in 2018, the constitutionally guaranteed rights of freedom of assembly and association witnessed a sharp decline by making digital security act-2018. Further, the overall human rights situation significantly deteriorated. Restrictions on the activities of political parties and civil societies, impunity to the excesses of the security forces, extrajudicial killing in the name of anti-drug campaign, enforced disappearance, violence against women, arbitrary arrests and assault on opposition political leaders and activists, intimidation and extortion are considered to be the main reasons for such a catastrophic state of affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project (CHTRDP II)
    Semi-annual Environmental Monitoring Report Project No. 42248-013 June 2019 Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project (CHTRDP II) This Semi-annual Environmental Monitoring Report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Project No. 42248-013 Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project J an – June 2019 June Environmental Monitoring Report 0 Environmental Monitoring Report Jan – June 2019 2763-BAN (SF): Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project CHTRDP II Project No. 42248-013 Environmental Monitoring Report Jan-June 2019 Prepared by: Md.Maksudul Amin Environmental Engineer (Individual Consultant) Safeguard and Quality Monitoring Cell (SQMC) Project Management Office Second Chittagong Hill Ttracts Rural Development Project, for the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh and The Asian Development Bank 1 Environmental Monitoring Report Jan – June 2019 This environmental monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • Betbunia Chairy Bazar-Bara Aoulia- Santirhat Road District: Rangamati
    Resettlement Plan Project No. 42248-013 Resettlement Plan May 2016 2763-BAN (SF): Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project Subproject: Betbunia Chairy Bazar-Bara Aoulia- Santirhat Road District: Rangamati Prepared by Chittagong Hill Tracts Regional Council for the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and the Asian Development Bank This resettlement plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. 'Feqls8i <l(stq.l T{sF "nfufi$q fr'$rs ra-fra.r "rftsf.fi -,r,fi {'\8Lfi qfi-{l{$. qTt n'i i:;.oo.oooo.ti..!.)8.scE.)A \r? e -f;1s )c/r,/t.,5r {il<a rr,io, Iosl{ G$,r sr,T *r 11fu e{ q+cq G15jGfi c5ift {]q]< {rd qrth$ rttttqEw*@'iAl F. l"i€r.€ ,!{ TtTs R-!?/)o!/"rtrfltq i/to),5/.eet Eiiilr, t8/q/t,,)s 'l].-o1 5Lrqtr "iai t*n :r+A 1l +ii:r e< Eril.n r-.tFilii (r.3] nqrn <ti qdl4rri .{k4 a[i -]qlr F qiiriIe.r € F,irrr.'rr Iiftrc- le- t.AllP 6- r'q6. a-({ qBi1n;r'r:d-r.T E...I t "G---.'f -*i,?l&{}-Y o,j aon rP:ln : bc8c.r1 ri,Jdheealion fri rahoo co l qofl {ioao ?ri'sI tucri 1A d:F]n err, qn "r{m q-or t.3<5t';ftT{.
    [Show full text]
  • Division Zila Upazila Name of Upazila/Thana 10 10 04 10 04
    Geo Code list (upto upazila) of Bangladesh As On March, 2013 Division Zila Upazila Name of Upazila/Thana 10 BARISAL DIVISION 10 04 BARGUNA 10 04 09 AMTALI 10 04 19 BAMNA 10 04 28 BARGUNA SADAR 10 04 47 BETAGI 10 04 85 PATHARGHATA 10 04 92 TALTALI 10 06 BARISAL 10 06 02 AGAILJHARA 10 06 03 BABUGANJ 10 06 07 BAKERGANJ 10 06 10 BANARI PARA 10 06 32 GAURNADI 10 06 36 HIZLA 10 06 51 BARISAL SADAR (KOTWALI) 10 06 62 MHENDIGANJ 10 06 69 MULADI 10 06 94 WAZIRPUR 10 09 BHOLA 10 09 18 BHOLA SADAR 10 09 21 BURHANUDDIN 10 09 25 CHAR FASSON 10 09 29 DAULAT KHAN 10 09 54 LALMOHAN 10 09 65 MANPURA 10 09 91 TAZUMUDDIN 10 42 JHALOKATI 10 42 40 JHALOKATI SADAR 10 42 43 KANTHALIA 10 42 73 NALCHITY 10 42 84 RAJAPUR 10 78 PATUAKHALI 10 78 38 BAUPHAL 10 78 52 DASHMINA 10 78 55 DUMKI 10 78 57 GALACHIPA 10 78 66 KALAPARA 10 78 76 MIRZAGANJ 10 78 95 PATUAKHALI SADAR 10 78 97 RANGABALI Geo Code list (upto upazila) of Bangladesh As On March, 2013 Division Zila Upazila Name of Upazila/Thana 10 79 PIROJPUR 10 79 14 BHANDARIA 10 79 47 KAWKHALI 10 79 58 MATHBARIA 10 79 76 NAZIRPUR 10 79 80 PIROJPUR SADAR 10 79 87 NESARABAD (SWARUPKATI) 10 79 90 ZIANAGAR 20 CHITTAGONG DIVISION 20 03 BANDARBAN 20 03 04 ALIKADAM 20 03 14 BANDARBAN SADAR 20 03 51 LAMA 20 03 73 NAIKHONGCHHARI 20 03 89 ROWANGCHHARI 20 03 91 RUMA 20 03 95 THANCHI 20 12 BRAHMANBARIA 20 12 02 AKHAURA 20 12 04 BANCHHARAMPUR 20 12 07 BIJOYNAGAR 20 12 13 BRAHMANBARIA SADAR 20 12 33 ASHUGANJ 20 12 63 KASBA 20 12 85 NABINAGAR 20 12 90 NASIRNAGAR 20 12 94 SARAIL 20 13 CHANDPUR 20 13 22 CHANDPUR SADAR 20 13 45 FARIDGANJ
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Productivity in the Irrigated
    ISSN 0258-7122 (Print), 2408-8293 (Online) Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 42(2): 387-392, June 2017 Short Communication GROWTH RATES OF FRUITS CULTIVATION IN HILLY AREAS OF BANGLADESH M. A. HOSSAIN1, M. KHATUN2, M. A. MATIN3 AND M. F. DEWAN4 Keywords: Hill regions, fruits, area, production, productivity, trend and growth rate. The fruits have vital role in making human diet balanced. Standard of living of people generally judged by per capita production and consumption of fruits (Bairwa et al., 2012). Bangladesh is producing a variety of fruits owing to its various agro-climatic conditions. Perennial crops like trees normally remain as grossly under exploited potential resources in hill agriculture. Fruits are usually grown by the hilly farmers and these crops give them few opportunities. Fruits play a unique role in developing countries like Bangladesh, both economic and social sphere for improving income and nutritional status, particularly for hilly people. Besides nutritional advantages, there are other competing reasons for which fruit production in hilly areas deserves preference. These include: (i) due to agro climatic features, horticulture is the only vocation through which higher income per unit of land can be generated. (ii) fruit farming helps in proper utilization of areas (iii) fruit cultivation allows optimum utilization of the gift of nature in making it possible to upgrade inferior fruit trees into superior ones by top working and by adopting other techniques of vegetative propagation (iv) given suitable combination, fruit farming can even be taken as a complementary occupation in hills to a set of other business propositions (Wasim, 2011). Siddiqu (2001) reported that very good quality litchi grows in the Chittagong district in hill area.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 2 Distribution Locations/Points of 2 and 3 Drawer File Cabinet - Rangamati District
    Annex 2 Distribution Locations/Points of 2 and 3 Drawer File Cabinet - Rangamati District 3 Drawer Cabinet : 04 (Chakma Circle and CHT Regional CouncilPer Headman 1 no. of Cabinet) Recepients : Chakma Circle SL. No. Karbari Name Contact Number Nos. of Unit Distribution Points Upazila Name 1 Chakma Circle 2 Rangamati Municipality Rangamati Sadar Office 2 CHT Regional Council 2 CHT Regional Council Office, Rangamati Sadar New Market Area, Rangamati Sadar Total = 4 2 Drawer Cabinet : 03 (Per Network 1 no. of Cabinet) Recepients : Headman, Karabari and Women Karbari Network SL. No. Karbari Name Contact Number Nos. of Unit Distribution Points Upazila Name 1 Headman Network Office 1 Rangamati Municipality Rangamati Sadar 2 Karbari Network Office 1 Rangamati Municipality Rangamati Sadar 3 Women Karbari Network Office 1 Rangamati Municipality Rangamati Sadar Total = 3 2 Drawer Cabinet : 160 (Per Headman 1 no. of Cabinet) Recepients : Headman SL. No. Headman Name Contact Number Mouza Name and No. Name of the Union Distribution Points 1 106 No.Kamilachori Mogban UP Rangamati Sadar Upazila Complex 2 107 No. Moghban do do 3 108 No. Manikchori do do 4 115 No. Moghhban do do 5 59 No. Rangapani Rangamati Municipality Rangamati Municipality Office 6 104 No. Jogorabil do do 7 59 No. Banduk Bangha Bandukbangha UP Rangamati Sadar Upazila Complex 8 58 No. Hazaribagh Balukhali UP do 9 114 No. Balukhali do do 10 116 No. Rangamati do do 11 125 No. Fulgazimachara do do 12 123 NO. Hemonto do do 13 128 No. Bosonto do do 14 129 No. Kandya do do 15 111 No.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaptai National Park
    ipac Site Level Field Appraisal for Integrated Protected Area Co-Management KAAPPTTAAII NAATTIIOONNAALL PAARRKK K N P Chittagong Hill Tracts Cluster Integrated Protected Area Co-management Project Rangamati, April – 2009 ipac Site-Level Field Appraisal for Integrated Protected Area Co-Management KKAAPPTTAAII NNAATTIIOONNAALL PPAARRKK Prepared by Nikhilesh Chakma, Partha Dewan, Mostafa Omar Sharif, Pulak Chakma Integrated Protected Area Co-Management (ipac) project CIPD Adivashi Unnayan Kendra (CIPD) April 2009 With partners: CIPD, CODEC, RDRS and WorldFish Centre Site Level Field Appraisal for Protected Area Co-management: Kaptai National Park TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..............................................................................................................................1 LIST OF TABLES.........................................................................................................................................3 LIST OF FIGURES.......................................................................................................................................3 1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................4 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................4 1.2 INFORMATION NEEDS OF IPAC AND LOGICAL BASIS FOR CONDUCTING PRA/RRA.........................6 1.3 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT....................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of Political Forests in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh: the State, Development and Indigeneity
    THE MAKING OF POLITICAL FORESTS IN THE CHITTAGONG HILL TRACTS, BANGLADESH: THE STATE, DEVELOPMENT AND INDIGENEITY KHAIRUL CHOWDHURY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES OF YORK UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO APRIL 2014 © Khairul Chowdhury 2014 Abstract This dissertation offers an anthropological and genealogical account of forests and social forestry, in particular the way they came to be constituted over time in one particular social- ecological context of Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT), Bangladesh. It draws on ethnographic fieldwork to examine how discourses of forest and forest relations in CHT since British rule have changed and shaped agrarian relations of the hill peoples and their relations to power. As such, this dissertation explores forest history in relation to an ‘ethnically’ different and ‘small group’ of population living within a nation-state so as to understand how nature/environment is constituted as a terrain of governmental power, subject formation, and state building. The analysis is informed by Michel Foucault’s ideas of discourse, power and knowledge; Peter Vandergeest’s and Nancy Peluso’s theory of territorialization and political forests; K. Sivaramakrishnan’s critical work on the production of colonial state, society, and knowledge in a forested region of colonial Bengal, and Tania Li’s and Arun Agrawal’s theoretical and ethnographic work on governmentality, indigenous communities, and resource struggles. The chapters of this dissertation are organized around the political regimes of Britain, Pakistan and Bangladesh, highlighting continuities and discontinuities in the making and remaking of political forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project
    Social Safeguards Monitoring Report Project No. 42248-013 Semestral Report January-June 2015 BAN: Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project Prepared by Kh. Khairul Matin Social Safeguards Specialist, Independent Consultants, Safeguard and Quality Monitoring Cell Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project, for the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh and the Asian Development Bank Semestral Report (Social Safeguards Monitoring) January- June 2015 This social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Ministry of Chittagong Hill Tracts Affairs ii Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project Semestral Report (Social Safeguards Monitoring) January- June 2015 . The People’s Republic of Bangladesh & Asian Development Bank Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project Loan № 2763-BAN, Project № 42248-013 Environmental & Social Safeguards Monitoring Report January - June 2015 Prepared by Kh. Khairul Matin, Consultants Safeguard and Quality Monitoring Cell (SQMC) Ministry of Chittagong Hill Tracts Affairs iii Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project
    [Show full text]