Correspondence Between the Chair of the Energy and Climate Change Committee and Various Publications (CE 36)
Correspondence between the Chair of the Energy and Climate Change Committee and various publications (CE 36) (CE 36a) Letter fro m the Cha ir to the Daily Express, the Daily Mirror, The Daily Telegraph, the Financial Times, The Guardian, The Independent, The Independent on Sunday, The Observer, The Times, The Sun, The Sun on Sunday, the Sunday Express, the Sunday Mirror, The Sunday Telegraph and The Sunday Times Concerns have been raised in evidence to the Committee’s inquiry into Consumer Engagement with Energy Markets that inaccurate reporting of the costs of ‘green’ energy policies, as levied on domestic energy bills, may be misleading the public. The Committee would like to offer you the opportunity to respond to these concerns in writing. For exa mp le, Carbon Brief, stated in its written evidence: Over the past nine months we have followed and analysed media coverage of ‘green’ policy measures and their impact on domestic energy bills in some detail. In particular, we have noted a series of newspaper articles which overstate the current impact of green policies (or ‘environmental and social costs’) on energy bills. Some appear to be the result of simple errors (for example, confusing electricity prices with energy bills, or ignoring the impact of gas prices on bills), others are the result of research being reported in a what seems to us a highly partial or selective way.1 This view was supported by the Department of Energy and Climate Change, which stated that the impact of environmental and social policies in household energy bills had been “exaggerated” by some media reports when in fact the “costs of these policies represent around 7% of the current average household dual fuel bill”.
[Show full text]