DOCSLIB.ORG

To Read the Comments in Full

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
To Read the Comments in Full Chattooga Conservancy • Defenders of Wildlife • Georgia ForestWatch • Sierra Club • Southern Environmental Law Center • The Wilderness Society Via U.S. Mail and Electronic Mail Ms. Betty Jewett January 10, 2020 Forest Supervisor ATTN: Stephanie Israel Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forest 1755 Cleveland Highway Gainesville, GA 30501 [email protected] [email protected] RE: Foothills Landscape Project Draft EA Comments Dear Ms. Jewett: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Foothills Landscape Project Draft Environmental Assessment (“Draft EA”). Please accept these comments on behalf of the Chattooga Conservancy, Defenders of Wildlife, Georgia ForestWatch, Sierra Club, Southern Environmental Law Center, and The Wilderness Society. As you know, many of us have participated in the process to develop the Foothills Landscape Project (“Foothills Project” or the “Project”) from the very beginning. We have attended nearly every public meeting, field trip, workshop, and symposium. We submitted comments at every formal and informal opportunity and we participated in the agency’s online discussion forum. Every time we saw a problem, we named it; every time we could offer support, we did. We have done everything the agency has asked of us even when we questioned the value in it. We continue to do that in this letter, recommending ways to improve the various proposed treatments even though we are deeply troubled by your approach to implementing those treatments. The staff of the Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forest (“the Chattahoochee” or “the Forest”) has clearly put significant time and energy into this project, which we greatly appreciate. But they are being told to force a square peg through a round hole – and its shows. As a result, these comments are overwhelmingly critical of the analysis in the Draft EA but they are certainly not critical of the staff or the effort they have put forward. We know the agency can complete sufficient analysis; we have seen it do so before. Its flawed pursuit of condition-based management has led it far afield here. 1 Every major concern raised in this letter has been brought to your attention previously, most of them over two years ago. We paired our concerns with suggested resolutions that would allow the agency to expeditiously pursue its goals, including, in the spirit of partnership, goals we do not share. Regrettably, the Forest Service has wholly disregarded our core suggestions. The Draft EA is rife with errors stemming from the same fundamental problems we have been pointing out to you for years. If this project is delayed because the agency has to take extra time to resolve these problems, it is not because we have not been exceedingly upfront about our concerns. What should we have done differently to bring these concerns to your attention? We too have invested significant time and energy in this process with the hope that it would succeed. You are of course free to ignore us but do not expect us to stop raising these concerns. We can have different opinions but our concerns are not “nonsense.”1 With this single project, the agency is proposing in 20% of the acreage of the Chattahoochee National Forest more logging than occurred from 2009-2019 on the Chattahoochee, Cherokee, George Washington-Jefferson, and Pisgah-Nantahala National Forests combined.2 This is on top of 50,000 acres of prescribed burning,3 up to 74,500 acres of herbicide application,4 untold “new temporary” road construction,5 potential undisclosed changes to over 100 miles of trails,6 over 350 miles of new bulldozed fire lines,7 and converting wood to chips on potentially 80,000 acres.8 The list does not stop there. These activities will affect endangered and threatened species,9 wetlands,10 cultural resources,11 a Wild and Scenic River,12 and Inventoried Roadless Areas.13 The proposal is “not constrained by a time limit”14 and the “pace and scale” of work is predicted to remain the same15 as the agency's present work on the Forest. At that rate, it will take more than 40 years to complete. Yet the agency has not proposed any 1 See Attachment 1. 2 See Southern Appalachian Project Analysis, included as Attachment 2. 3 Draft EA, App’x B. 4 Vegetation Report, AP7. 5 Soil Report, 22. 6 Draft EA, App’x B. 7 Soil Report, 32. 8 Aquatic Resource Report, 25. 9 See Terrestrial Wildlife Resources Report, Aquatic Resources Report, Botanical and Rare Communities Report. 10 Botanical and Rare Communities Report, 12. 11 See Cultural Resources Report. 12 See Draft EA, 70; Draft EA Maps 15-17. 13 See Inventoried Roadless Areas Report. 14 Scoping Summary Report, 11. 15 See Attachment 1 (Deciding officer: “As far as implementation, the pace and scale will be the same”). 2 specific locations for the work, just general concepts that will be pursued somewhere within a 157,000-acre area. The agency hosted multiple public meetings to discuss these general concepts, and we appreciate that effort. But we have repeatedly raised concerns about the approach being implemented at these meetings and questioned whether the meetings were moving towards any specific conclusion.16 The approach taken in the Draft EA – general concepts with no specificity, no timeline, and no NEPA-mandated public participation – is exactly what we spent all of that energy trying to avoid. The agency seems to expect the public to trade away its right to participate in decades of site-specific decision making—a right it is guaranteed under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”)—in exchange for a handful of meetings where concepts behind work already occurring on the forest were discussed.17 Surely the agency sees that is a terrible trade for the public. We understand the agency is promising to offer once-a-year meetings with the Districts as they implement this project, as well as the possibility of field trips. But NEPA defines meaningful public participation as requiring the agency to take a hard look at the impacts of its action, disclose its analysis to the public, respond to public concerns, and consider alternative methods of achieving its goals. Many of our concerns would evaporate if the agency would just commit to offer public participation opportunities under NEPA when it proposes site-specific actions in the future. Its refusal to do so forces us to conclude that the agency will not offer that caliber of opportunity. As we explain in these comments, that is illegal. For a steward of public lands, it is also wrong. As the agency’s first Chief said, “consult[ing] the public … is what you are hired for.”18 After two years of little to no public involvement, the agency found it imperative to offer this comment period over holidays at the end of 2019 and beginning of 2020, which it knew was the hardest time of year for the public to devote attention to these issues. Numerous requests19 from the public to delay the comment period until after the holidays were denied.20 That does not inspire confidence that the agency is committed to widening public understanding. Nor does the agency’s attempt to satisfy NEPA by offering a single opportunity for public participation, now, for a decades-long project with no site-specific proposals. If you are not trying to remove 16 See, e.g., Patrick Hunter, SELC, phone call with Angie Bell, USFS Foothills Team Leader (Jan. 19, 2017); Letter from Chattooga Conservancy to Chattahoochee National Forest (March 19, 2017); Letter from Georgia ForestWatch et al. to Angie Bell, USFS Foothills Team Leader (June 9, 2017); Patrick Hunter, SELC, phone call with Betty Jewett, Angie Bell, and Nelson Gonzalez-Sullow, USFS (Aug. 15, 2017); Georgia ForestWatch et al. Comments on Draft Restoration Plan (Sept. 28, 2017); Letter from Chattooga Conservancy et al. to Angie Bell, USFS Foothills Team Leader (Oct. 16, 2017); Meeting at the Forest Supervisor’s Office to discuss the Foothills Project’s approach to NEPA compliance (Nov. 14, 2017); Letter from Georgia ForestWatch et al. to Betty Jewett, Forest Supervisor (Dec. 22, 2017); Letter from Georgia ForestWatch et al. to Stephanie Israel, USFS Foothills Team Leader (Feb. 1, 2019); numerous additional personal communications. 17 See Attachment 1 (Deciding officer: “the work we are proposing is work we have been doing for years”). 18 Gifford Pinchot’s 11 Maxims. 19 See, e.g., Letter from Chattooga Conservancy, et al. to Betty Jewett (Dec. 6, 2019). 20 See, e.g., Letter from Betty Jewett to Patrick Hunter (Dec. 13, 2019). 3 the public from the process of making site-specific decisions, why not alter your approach? We have long suggested other ways to increase the pace of work on the forest without cutting the public out. Our repeated calls for meaningful public participation have not been calls for more meetings. We can meet until we are blue in the face but that is not a replacement for meaningful disclosure of critical information: specifically, what the agency is proposing to do, when, how, and where. We do not ask for this information as pointless specificity; these decisions, which the Forest Service wants to defer until a time when the public can no longer participate through NEPA, are consequential. Where, how, and when project activities occur (and how rapidly) matters immensely. The same actions in different locations often cause very different environmental harms in a landscape as complex, both ecologically and culturally, as the Foothills area. In such a complex area, site-specific information is the foundation of any public understanding of the actions envisioned under this project, but the agency has not provided it in the Draft EA or elsewhere.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jacks River Hiking Trail
    Jacks River Hiking Trail A little over nine miles into the Jacks River Trail, hikers encounter Jacks River Falls-an impressive 80-foot, two-tier waterfall. For hikers contemplating a walk on the Jacks River Trail, it's helpful have a little background on the Cohutta Wilderness, the location of the trail, before beginning the hike. Officially designated on January 3, 1975, the Cohutta Wilderness now encompasses 36,977 acres - 35,268 acres within Georgia and the remainder in Tennessee. The Georgia portion of the wilderness is located northeast of Chatsworth, primarily in Fannin and Murray counties. The Georgia Wilderness Bill of 1986 added 2,940 acres, all within the Chattahoochee National Forest, to the Cohutta Wilderness. This new designation extended the Cohutta to the northeast, from Dally Gap along FS 22 to the Tennessee line. Although much of this wilderness was logged earlier in the century, the forest has returned, healing the scarred land and obliterating all but the smallest traces of man's past exploitation. With continued wilderness designation and the passage of time, the forest will slowly regain much of its former magnificence. A network of fifteen trails totaling 87 miles penetrates this rugged wilderness, where elevations range from 950 to 4,200 feet. All but three of these trails lead to or follow the scenic Jacks and Conasauga Rivers, whose headwaters are protected by National Forest land in and around the wilderness. These two rivers are among the few larger streams in North Georgia that still offer quality wild-trout fishing. Tennessee's 8,082-acre Big Frog Wilderness in the Cherokee National Forest is contiguous with the Cohutta Wilderness along the Cohutta's northern border.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Fast Facts CHATTAHOOCHEE-OCONEE
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Fast Facts CHATTAHOOCHEE-OCONEE NATIONAL FORESTS The Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests provide the finest outdoor recreation opportunities and natural resources in Georgia. Featuring over 867,000 acres across 27 counties, thousands of miles of clear-running streams and rivers, approximately 850 miles of recreation trails, and dozens of campgrounds, picnic areas, and other recreation activity opportunities, these lands are rich in natural scenery, history and culture. 867,634 Acres of national forest in Georgia Nature viewing is the second most popular visitor activity. The mission of the USDA Forest Service is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the nation's forests and grasslands to meet the needs of present and future generations. Gifford Pinchot, first Chief of the Forest Service, summed up the mission of the Forest Service: "to provide the greatest amount of Number of good for the greatest amount of people in the long run." counties in Georgia with 27 national forest lands Forest Chattahoochee-Oconee Service National Forests December 2017 United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Areas The Cohutta Wilderness is the largest national forest Wilderness east of the Mississippi River. There are 117,837 acres of wilderness on the national forests in Georgia. Volunteers working to 10 maintain a recreation trail. Volunteers Approximately 90 percent of volunteer work is related to trails and recreation programs. 57,000 volunteer hours, worth more than $1.3 million, are donated on the national forest each year. 2.9 million Number of annual visitors to the national forest2 Hiking is the most popular visitor use of the national forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards ( 1) Purpose. The establishment of water quality standards. (2) W ate r Quality Enhancement: (a) The purposes and intent of the State in establishing Water Quality Standards are to provide enhancement of water quality and prevention of pollution; to protect the public health or welfare in accordance with the public interest for drinking water supplies, conservation of fish, wildlife and other beneficial aquatic life, and agricultural, industrial, recreational, and other reasonable and necessary uses and to maintain and improve the biological integrity of the waters of the State. ( b) The following paragraphs describe the three tiers of the State's waters. (i) Tier 1 - Existing instream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing uses shall be maintained and protected. (ii) Tier 2 - Where the quality of the waters exceed levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and recreation in and on the water, that quality shall be maintained and protected unless the division finds, after full satisfaction of the intergovernmental coordination and public participation provisions of the division's continuing planning process, that allowing lower water quality is necessary to accommodate important economic or social development in the area in which the waters are located.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia's Mountain Treasure Areas - 2018
    Georgia's Mountain Treasure Areas - 2018 In previous Mountain Total Name Cluster Treasures Acres County Trails Hidden Creek Armuchee yes 6,429 Gordon None Johns Mountain Armuchee partially 8,451 Walker, Chattooga, Floyd Pinhoti, Keown Falls, Dry Creek Rocky Face Armuchee partially 8,624 Whitfield, Walker Pinhoti Rabun Bald Chattooga Watershed yes 17,814 Rabun Bartram, Three Forks, Pinnacle Ellicott Rock Extension Chattooga Watershed partially 3,969 Rabun None Rock Gorge Chattooga Watershed yes 3,881 Rabun Foothills Three Forks Chattooga Watershed yes 6,075 Rabun Three forks Five Falls Chattooga Watershed yes 7,488 Rabun Water Gauge, Raven Rcok Thrifts Ferry Chattooga Watershed yes 5,976 Rabun Bartram, Chattooga River Big Shoals Chattooga Watershed partially 5,635 Rabun Bartram, Willis Knob Horse Grassy Mountain Cohutta yes 9,746 Murray Windy Gap, Rocky Flats, Milma Creek Mountaintown Cohutta yes 15,604 Gimer, Fannin Benton MacKaye, Pinhoti, Bear Creek Cohutta Extensions Cohutta partially 5,239 Fannin, Murray Benton MacKaye, Pinhoti,South Fork, Horseshoe Bend Emery Creek Cohutta yes 4,277 Murray Emory Creek Buzzard Knob Northern Blue Ridge yes 9,612 Rabun, Towns None Kelly Ridge Northern Blue Ridge yes 10,408 Rabun, Towns AT Patterson Gap Northern Blue Ridge yes 5,591 Rabun None Southern Nantahala Extensions Northern Blue Ridge yes 7,200 Towns, Rabun None Andrews Cove Northern Blue Ridge partially 4,706 White, Towns AT, Andrews Cove, Rocky Mountain Brasstown Extension Northern Blue Ridge partially 5,087 Towns, Union Miller Trek High Shoals
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Guided Driving Tours: Regional Towns & Outdoor Recreation Areas
    13 10 MILES N 14 # ©2020 TreasureMaps®.com All rights reserved Chattanooga Self-Guided Driving Tours: NORTH CAROLINA NORTH 2 70 miles Nantahala 68 GEORGIA Gorge Regional Towns & Outdoor MAP AREA 74 40 miles Asheville co Recreation Areas O ee 110 miles R i ve r Murphy Ocoee 12 Whitewater 64 1 Aska Adventure Area Center 2 Suches 64 3 Blairsville 69 175 Copperhill Blood Mountain-Walesi-Yi TENNESSEE NORTH CAROLINA 4 GEORGIA Interpretive Center GEORGIA McCaysville GEORGIA 75 5 Richard Russell Scenic Epworth spur T 76 11 o 60 Hiwassee Highway c 5 c 129 8 Cohutta o a 6 Brasstown Bald Wilderness BR Scenic RR 60 Young R 288 iv Harris e 7 Vogel State Park r Mineral Bluff 8 Young Harris & Hiawassee 2 6 Mercier 3 Brasstown 9 Alpine Helen Orchards Bald Morganton Blairsville 10 Dahlonega Lake 515 Blue 17 old 11 Cohutta Wilderness Ridge 76 Blue Ocoee Whitewater Center Ridge 19 12 A s k a 60 13 Cherohala Skyway R oa 180 Benton TrailMacKaye 1 d 7 14 Nantahala River & Gorge Vogel State Park 15 Ellijay Cooper Creek 17 CHATTAHOOCHEE Scenic Area 16 Amicalola Falls Rich Mtn. 75 Fort Mountain State Park Wilderness 17 Unicoi 515 180 4 5 State Toccoa 356 52 River 348 Park Main Welcome Center 19 Helen McCaysville Visitor Center 60 9 Benton MacKaye Trail Suches Ellijay Appalachian Trail 15 Three 2 Forks 75 64 Highway Number NATIONAL Appalachian Trail 129 alt Atlanta 19 75 miles Springer 75 Mountain 52 Cleveland 255 16 Amicalola FOREST Falls State Park 10 Dahlonega 115 52 129 Get the free App! https://www.blueridgemountains.com/ get-the-app/ 14 Nantahala River & Gorge, Follow Highway 19/74 through Self-Guided Driving Tours: Regional 6 Brasstown Bald, Rising 4,784 feet above sea level is # Georgia’s highest point atop Brasstown Bald.
    [Show full text]
  • Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers: Maps -- by Region Or
    G3862 SOUTHERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3862 FEATURES, ETC. .C55 Clayton Aquifer .C6 Coasts .E8 Eutaw Aquifer .G8 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway .L6 Louisville and Nashville Railroad 525 G3867 SOUTHEASTERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3867 FEATURES, ETC. .C5 Chattahoochee River .C8 Cumberland Gap National Historical Park .C85 Cumberland Mountains .F55 Floridan Aquifer .G8 Gulf Islands National Seashore .H5 Hiwassee River .J4 Jefferson National Forest .L5 Little Tennessee River .O8 Overmountain Victory National Historic Trail 526 G3872 SOUTHEAST ATLANTIC STATES. REGIONS, G3872 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .B6 Blue Ridge Mountains .C5 Chattooga River .C52 Chattooga River [wild & scenic river] .C6 Coasts .E4 Ellicott Rock Wilderness Area .N4 New River .S3 Sandhills 527 G3882 VIRGINIA. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G3882 .A3 Accotink, Lake .A43 Alexanders Island .A44 Alexandria Canal .A46 Amelia Wildlife Management Area .A5 Anna, Lake .A62 Appomattox River .A64 Arlington Boulevard .A66 Arlington Estate .A68 Arlington House, the Robert E. Lee Memorial .A7 Arlington National Cemetery .A8 Ash-Lawn Highland .A85 Assawoman Island .A89 Asylum Creek .B3 Back Bay [VA & NC] .B33 Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge .B35 Baker Island .B37 Barbours Creek Wilderness .B38 Barboursville Basin [geologic basin] .B39 Barcroft, Lake .B395 Battery Cove .B4 Beach Creek .B43 Bear Creek Lake State Park .B44 Beech Forest .B454 Belle Isle [Lancaster County] .B455 Belle Isle [Richmond] .B458 Berkeley Island .B46 Berkeley Plantation .B53 Big Bethel Reservoir .B542 Big Island [Amherst County] .B543 Big Island [Bedford County] .B544 Big Island [Fluvanna County] .B545 Big Island [Gloucester County] .B547 Big Island [New Kent County] .B548 Big Island [Virginia Beach] .B55 Blackwater River .B56 Bluestone River [VA & WV] .B57 Bolling Island .B6 Booker T.
    [Show full text]
  • 2096 Pubuc Law 93-622-Jan. 3, 1975 [88 Stat
    2096 PUBUC LAW 93-622-JAN. 3, 1975 [88 STAT. 16 use 1278. (c) In clause (i) of subsection (b) of section 7 strike the final comma and the following word "and" and insert in lieu thereof a colon and the following proviso: '•'•Provided^ That if any Act designating any river or rivers for potential addition to the national wild and scenic rivers system provides a period for the study or studies Avhich exceeds such three complete fiscal year period the period provided for in such Act shall be substituted for the three complete fiscal year period in the provisions of this clause (i); and'*. 16 use 1275. (d) In the fourth sentence of subsection (a) of section 4: (1) between "rivers" and "with" insert "(i)", and (2) strike "system." and insert in lieu thereof "system, and (ii) which possess the greatest proportion of private lands withiu their areas.". 16 use 1274 note. SEC. 2. Subsection (a) of section 6 of the Lower Saint Croix Kiver Act of 1972 (86 Stat. 1174) is amended by deleting "$7,275,000" and inserting in lieu thereof "$19,000,000". Approved January 3, 1975. Public Law 93-622 January 3, 1975 AN ACT [S. 3433] To further the purposes of the Wilderness Act by designating certain acquired lands for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System, to provide for study of certain additional lands for such inclusion, and for other purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the National Wilder­ United States of America in Congress assemhled^ ness Preservation System.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hiking Trailsof North Georgia
    Third Edition The Hiking Trails of North Georgia Tim Homan Updated trail information gathered in collaboration with (Beth Giddens, Editor) Because conditions are constantly changing, Peachtree Publishers can assume no liability for accidents or injuries incurred on the trails described in this book. Published by PEACHTREE PUBLISHERS, LTD. 1700 Chattahoochee Avenue Atlanta, Georgia 30318-2112 Third Edition Text © 1981, 1986, 1987, 1997, 2001 by Tim Homan Cover photo © 1992, 1997 Craig M. Tanner All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or any other—except for brief quotations in printed reviews, without the prior permission of the publisher. Manufactured in the United States of America Book and cover design by Loraine M. Balcsik Cover photo by Craig M. Tanner Composition by Darren Schillace Maps by Doug Ponte 10 9 8 7 6 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Homan, Tim. The hiking trails of north Georgia / Tim Homan. —3rd ed. p. cm. ISBN 1-56145-127-4 1. Hiking—Georgia—Guidebooks. 2. Trails—Georgia—Guidebooks. 3. Georgia—Guidebooks. I. Title. GV199.42.G46H65 1997 917.58—DC20 95-52151 CIP Cover photograph: Autumn ferns along the Tennessee Rock Trail at Black Rock Mountain State Park. Table of Contents Preface to the Third Edition . xi Scope of the Book . .xii Definition of a Trail . .xii The Information Column . xiii The Hiking Trails Rabun Bald . .1 Holcomb Creek Trail . 1 Rabun Bald Trail . .3 Chattooga River Area Map . .5 Chattooga River .
    [Show full text]
  • To Download Introduction to Georgia's
    Project Wild Teacher Resource Guide: Introduction to Georgia’s Natural History Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division Timothy S. Keyes TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Prehistoric Georgia ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Physiographic Regions ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 MOUNTAINS --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 CUMBERLAND PLATEAU -------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 Caves --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 Key Plants and Animals ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 RIDGE AND VALLEY ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 Etowah River ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 8 Key Plants and Animals ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -8 BLUE RIDGE --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 Cove Forests ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 Key Plants and Animals ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 PIEDMONT -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Map Home Mapped Comments
    Foothills Landscape Collaboration on the Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests Map Home Mapped Comments Mapped Comments Thinking Like a Landscape: Our landscapes are more than trees and streams. They provide a sense of place for Sharing a Sense of Place people – reflecting our histories and defining our futures. 26 Comments This fall, through a series of community conversations along with this online forum we are reaching out to Providing Sustainable Recreation Opportunities partners, stakeholders and community members to 115 Comments realize a shared vision to address complex conservation Managing Healthy Forests, Fish and Wildlife challenges across the Foothills Landscape. Habitats Project Purpose: The purpose of this project is to create, 94 Comments restore and maintain ecosystems that are more resilient Caring for Unique Habitats to natural disturbances. Specifically, the Forest Service is 19 Comments seeking to enhance and provide quality habitat for rare and declining species, as well as desired game and non- Protecting Communities from Wildfire game species; to reduce hazardous fuel loading across 11 Comments the landscape to diminish damaging wildfires; to improve soil and water quality; to provide sustainable recreation General Comment and access opportunities; and to awaken and strengthen 53 Comments a connection to these lands for all people. We Need YOU: We need your knowledge and insights right from the start in order to plan the right work in the right places for the right reasons. Share what you know about the Foothills Landscape with others through this collaboration. Comment on what you care about and tell your community why, and use the map to show us all where.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 82, No. 156/Tuesday, August 15, 2017
    38654 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 15, 2017 / Proposed Rules substantial number of small entities ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 AGENCY commenting-epa-dockets. U.S.C. 601 et seq.); FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 40 CFR Part 52 • Does not contain any unfunded Michele Notarianni, Air Regulatory mandate or significantly or uniquely [EPA–R04–OAR–2016–0634; FRL–9966–32– Management Section, Air Planning and affect small governments, as described Region 4] Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Air Plan Approval; Georgia; Regional Environmental Protection Agency, of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); Haze Progress Report Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., • Does not have Federalism Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Ms. AGENCY: implications as specified in Executive Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Notarianni can be reached by phone at Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, (404) 562–9031 and via electronic mail ACTION: 1999); Proposed rule. at [email protected]. • Is not an economically significant SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: regulatory action based on health or Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a I. Background safety risks subject to Executive Order State Implementation Plan (SIP) States are required to submit a 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); revision submitted by the State of progress report in the form of a SIP • Georgia, Department of Natural Is not a significant regulatory action Resources, through the Georgia revision during the first implementation subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR Environmental Protection Division (GA period that evaluates progress towards 28355, May 22, 2001); EPD) on January 8, 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Georgia Greenspace Conservation and Greenway Planning
    Northwest Georgia Greenspace Conservation and Greenway Planning July 20, 2010 Prepared by the Northwest Georgia Regional Commission with funding from The Georgia Department of Community Affairs 10072010.124 CEDS PLANS Acknowledgements: Portions of this document derive from the Inventory and Assessment for the 2004 Coosa-North Georgia Joint Regional Comprehensive Plan, prepared by the Coosa Valley Regional Development Center and the North Georgia Regional Development Center. The descriptions and maps of the Environmental Corridors are based on the Georgia Department of Natural Resources’ 1976 “Environmental Corridor Study.” 10072010.124 CEDS PLANS Northwest Georgia Greenspace Conservation and Greenway Planning Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Description of Region III. Why Conserve? IV. Threats V. Visions and Goals VI. Measures in Place VII. Conservation Tools VIII. Funding Sources IX. Potential Partners X. Incentives XI. Existing Public Resources XII. Planning and Implementation Strategies XIII. Greenways Concept Map XIV. Model for Greenspace Development Guidelines XV. Map Appendix 10072010.124 CEDS PLANS Introduction The dispersal of population into once remote and rural areas has caused land consumption to soar. According to the U.S. Bureau of Census Data on Urbanized Areas, from 1970 to 1990, Atlanta experienced a 161.3% growth in total land area, while Chattanooga showed an expansion of 120.1%. These two metro areas are linked by Interstate 75, and as they grow together, they will consume much unprotected land in the fifteen-county region. While population growth is a factor in land consumption, development patterns are as important. From 1970 to 1990, the population of Detroit decreased by 7%, while sprawl increased by 28%.
    [Show full text]