Inner Mean-Motion Resonances with Eccentric Planets: a Possible Origin for Exozodiacal Dust Clouds
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Using Kepler Systems to Constrain the Frequency and Severity of Dynamical Effects on Habitable Planets Alexander James Mustill Melvyn B
Using Kepler systems to constrain the frequency and severity of dynamical effects on habitable planets Alexander James Mustill Melvyn B. Davies Anders Johansen Dynamical instability bad for habitability • Excitation of eccentricity can shift HZ or cause extreme seasons (Spiegel+10, Dressing+10) • Planets may be scattered out of HZ • Planet-planet collisions may remove biospheres, atmospheres, water • Earth-like planets may be eaten by Neptunes/Jupiters Strong dynamical effects: scattering and Kozai • Scattering: closely-spaced giant planets excite each others’ eccentricities (Chatterjee+08) • Kozai: inclined external perturber (e.g. binary) can cause very large eccentricity fluctuations (Kozai 62, Lidov 62, Naoz 16) Relevance of inner systems to HZ • If you can • form a hot Jupiter through high-eccentricity migration • damage a Kepler system at few tenths of an au • you will damage the habitable zone too Relevance of inner systems intrinsically • Large number of single-candidate systems found by Kepler relative to multiples • Is this left over from formation? Or do the multiples evolve into singles through dynamics? (Johansen+12) • Informs models of planet formation • all the Kepler systems are interestingly different to the Solar system, but do we have two interestingly different channels of planet formation or only one? What do we know about the prevalence of strong dynamical effects? • So far know little about planets in HZ • What we do know: • Violent dynamical history strong contender for hot Jupiter migration • Many giants have high -
Dynamics of the Terrestrial Planets from a Large Number of N-Body Simulations ∗ Rebecca A
Earth and Planetary Science Letters 392 (2014) 28–38 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth and Planetary Science Letters www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl Dynamics of the terrestrial planets from a large number of N-body simulations ∗ Rebecca A. Fischer , Fred J. Ciesla Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, 5734 S Ellis Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, USA article info abstract Article history: The agglomeration of planetary embryos and planetesimals was the final stage of terrestrial planet Received 6 September 2013 formation. This process is modeled using N-body accretion simulations, whose outcomes are tested by Received in revised form 26 January 2014 comparing to observed physical and chemical Solar System properties. The outcomes of these simulations Accepted 3 February 2014 are stochastic, leading to a wide range of results, which makes it difficult at times to identify the full Availableonline25February2014 range of possible outcomes for a given dynamic environment. We ran fifty high-resolution simulations Editor: T. Elliott each with Jupiter and Saturn on circular or eccentric orbits, whereas most previous studies ran an Keywords: order of magnitude fewer. This allows us to better quantify the probabilities of matching various accretion observables, including low probability events such as Mars formation, and to search for correlations N-body simulations between properties. We produce many good Earth analogues, which provide information about the mass terrestrial planets evolution and provenance of the building blocks of the Earth. Most observables are weakly correlated Mars or uncorrelated, implying that individual evolutionary stages may reflect how the system evolved even late veneer if models do not reproduce all of the Solar System’s properties at the end. -
Astrophysics Division Astrophysics Douglas Hudgins Program Scientist, Exoplanet Exploration Program Key NASA/SMD Science Themes
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA and the Search for Life on Planets around Other Stars A presentation to the National Academies Committee on Exoplanet Science Strategy 6 March 2018 Paul Hertz Director, Astrophysics Division Astrophysics Douglas Hudgins Program Scientist, Exoplanet Exploration Program Key NASA/SMD Science Themes Protect and Improve Life on Earth Search for Life Elsewhere Discover the Secrets of the Universe 2 Talk summary 3 NASA’s Exoplanet Exploration Program Space Missions and Mission Studies Public Communications Kepler, WFIRST Decadal Studies K2 Starshade Coronagraph Supporting Research & Technology Key Sustaining Research NASA Exoplanet Science Institute Technology Development Coronagraph Masks Large Binocular Keck Single Aperture Telescope Interferometer Imaging and RV High-Contrast Deployable Archives, Tools, Sagan Fellowships, Imaging Starshades Professional Engagement NN-EXPLORE https://exoplanets.nasa.gov 4 Foundational Documents for the NASA’s Astrophysics Division 5 NASA’s cross-divisional Search for Life Elsewhere ASTROPHYSICS • Exoplanet detection and Planetary SCIENCE/ characterization ASTROBIOLOGY • Stellar characterization • Comparative planetology • Mission data analysis • Planetary atmospheres Hubble, Spitzer, Kepler, • Assessment of observable TESS, JWST, WFIRST, biosignatures etc. • Habitability EARTH SCIENCES • GCM • Planets as systems PLANETARY SCIENCE RESEARCH HELIOPHYSICS • Exoplanet characterization • Stellar characterization • Protoplanetary disks • Stellar winds • Planet formation • Detection of planetary • Comparative planetology magnetospheres 6 Exoplanet Exploration at NASA 2007 - present 7 The Spitzer Space Telescope For the last decade, the Spitzer Space Telescope has used both spectroscopic and photometric measurements in the mid-IR to probe exoplanets and exoplanetary systems. • Spitzer follow up observations of known transiting systems have revealed additional, new planets and helped refine measurements of the size and orbital dynamics of known planets as small as the Earth. -
Exep Science Plan Appendix (SPA) (This Document)
ExEP Science Plan, Rev A JPL D: 1735632 Release Date: February 15, 2019 Page 1 of 61 Created By: David A. Breda Date Program TDEM System Engineer Exoplanet Exploration Program NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Dr. Nick Siegler Date Program Chief Technologist Exoplanet Exploration Program NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Concurred By: Dr. Gary Blackwood Date Program Manager Exoplanet Exploration Program NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology EXOPDr.LANET Douglas Hudgins E XPLORATION PROGRAMDate Program Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program ScienceScience Plan Mission DirectorateAppendix NASA Headquarters Karl Stapelfeldt, Program Chief Scientist Eric Mamajek, Deputy Program Chief Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program JPL CL#19-0790 JPL Document No: 1735632 ExEP Science Plan, Rev A JPL D: 1735632 Release Date: February 15, 2019 Page 2 of 61 Approved by: Dr. Gary Blackwood Date Program Manager, Exoplanet Exploration Program Office NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory Dr. Douglas Hudgins Date Program Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program Science Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters Created by: Dr. Karl Stapelfeldt Chief Program Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program Office NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Dr. Eric Mamajek Deputy Program Chief Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program Office NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology This research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. © 2018 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Exoplanet Exploration Program JPL CL#19-0790 ExEP Science Plan, Rev A JPL D: 1735632 Release Date: February 15, 2019 Page 3 of 61 Table of Contents 1. -
Curriculum Vitae
CURRICULUM VITAE Smadar Naoz September 2021 Contact University of California Los Angeles, Information Department of Physics & Astronomy 30 Portola Plaza, Box 951547 E-mail: [email protected] Los Angeles, CA 90095 WWW: http://www.astro.ucla.edu/∼snaoz/ Research Dynamics of planetary, stellar and black hole systems, which include formation of Hot Jupiters, Interests globular clusters, spiral structure, compact objects etc. Cosmology, structure formation in the early Universe, reionization and 21cm fluctuations. Education Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Ph.D. in Physics, January 2010 Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel M.S. in Physics, Magna Cum Laude, 2004 B.S. in Physics 2002 Positions University of California, Los Angeles Associate professor since July 2019 Howard & Astrid Preston Term Chair in Astrophysics since July 2018 Assistant professor 2014-2019 Harvard Smithsonian CfA, Institute for Theory and Computation Einstein Fellow, September 2012 { June 2014 ITC Fellow, September 2011 { August 2012 Northwestern University, CIERA Gruber Fellow, September 2010 { August 2011 Postdoctoral associate in theoretical astrophysics, January 2010 { August 2010 Scholarships Helen B. Warner Prize, awarded by the American Astronomical Society, 2020 Honors and Scialog fellow, and accepted proposal, Signatures of Life in the Universe, 2020/2021 (conference Awards postponed to 2021 due to COVID-19) Career Commitment to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Award, given by UCLA Academic Senate 2019. For other diversity awards, see xDEI. Hellman Fellows Award, awarded by Hellman Fellows Program, aimed to support the research of promising Assistant Professors who show capacity for great distinction in their research, June 2017 Multiple departmental teaching awards 2015-2019, see xTeaching, for details Sloan Research Fellowships awarded by the Alfred P. -
Dynamical Models of Terrestrial Planet Formation
Dynamical Models of Terrestrial Planet Formation Jonathan I. Lunine, LPL, The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ USA, 85721. [email protected] David P. O’Brien, Planetary Science Institute, Tucson AZ USA 85719 Sean N. Raymond, CASA, University of Colorado, Boulder CO USA 80302 Alessandro Morbidelli, Obs. de la Coteˆ d’Azur, Nice, F-06304 France Thomas Quinn, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Seattle USA 98195 Amara L. Graps, SWRI, Boulder CO USA 80302 Revision submitted to Advanced Science Letters May 23, 2009 Abstract We review the problem of the formation of terrestrial planets, with particular emphasis on the interaction of dynamical and geochemical models. The lifetime of gas around stars in the process of formation is limited to a few million years based on astronomical observations, while isotopic dating of meteorites and the Earth-Moon system suggest that perhaps 50-100 million years were required for the assembly of the Earth. Therefore, much of the growth of the terrestrial planets in our own system is presumed to have taken place under largely gas-free conditions, and the physics of terrestrial planet formation is dominated by gravitational interactions and collisions. The ear- liest phase of terrestrial-planet formation involve the growth of km-sized or larger planetesimals from dust grains, followed by the accumulations of these planetesimals into ∼100 lunar- to Mars- mass bodies that are initially gravitationally isolated from one-another in a swarm of smaller plan- etesimals, but eventually grow to the point of significantly perturbing one-another. The mutual perturbations between the embryos, combined with gravitational stirring by Jupiter, lead to orbital crossings and collisions that drive the growth to Earth-sized planets on a timescale of 107 − 108 years. -
Overview and Reassessment of Noise Budget of Starshade Exoplanet Imaging
Overview and reassessment of noise budget of starshade exoplanet imaging a,b, a a a Renyu Hu , * Doug Lisman, Stuart Shaklan , Stefan Martin , a a Phil Willems , and Kendra Short aJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, United States bCalifornia Institute of Technology, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, Pasadena, California, United States Abstract. High-contrast imaging enabled by a starshade in formation flight with a space telescope can provide a near-term pathway to search for and characterize temperate and small planets of nearby stars. NASA’s Starshade Technology Development Activity to TRL5 (S5) is rapidly maturing the required technologies to the point at which starshades could be integrated into potential future missions. We reappraise the noise budget of starshade-enabled exoplanet imaging to incorporate the experimentally demonstrated optical performance of the starshade and its optical edge. Our analyses of stray light sources—including the leakage through micro- — meteoroid damage and the reflection of bright celestial bodies indicate that sunlight scattered by the optical edge (i.e., the solar glint) is by far the dominant stray light. With telescope and observation parameters that approximately correspond to Starshade Rendezvous with Roman and Habitable Exoplanet Observatory (HabEx), we find that the dominating noise source is exo- zodiacal light for characterizing a temperate and Earth-sized planet around Sun-like and earlier stars and the solar glint for later-type stars. Further, reducing the brightness of solar glint by a factor of 10 with a coating would prevent it from becoming the dominant noise for both Roman −10 and HabEx. -
Three-Body Capture of Irregular Satellites: Application to Jupiter
Icarus 208 (2010) 824–836 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Three-body capture of irregular satellites: Application to Jupiter Catherine M. Philpott a,*, Douglas P. Hamilton a, Craig B. Agnor b a Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-2421, USA b Astronomy Unit, School of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E14NS, UK article info abstract Article history: We investigate a new theory of the origin of the irregular satellites of the giant planets: capture of one Received 19 October 2009 member of a 100-km binary asteroid after tidal disruption. The energy loss from disruption is sufficient Revised 24 March 2010 for capture, but it cannot deliver the bodies directly to the observed orbits of the irregular satellites. Accepted 26 March 2010 Instead, the long-lived capture orbits subsequently evolve inward due to interactions with a tenuous cir- Available online 7 April 2010 cumplanetary gas disk. We focus on the capture by Jupiter, which, due to its large mass, provides a stringent test of our model. Keywords: We investigate the possible fates of disrupted bodies, the differences between prograde and retrograde Irregular satellites captures, and the effects of Callisto on captured objects. We make an impulse approximation and discuss Jupiter, Satellites Planetary dynamics how it allows us to generalize capture results from equal-mass binaries to binaries with arbitrary mass Satellites, Dynamics ratios. Jupiter We find that at Jupiter, binaries offer an increase of a factor of 10 in the capture rate of 100-km objects as compared to single bodies, for objects separated by tens of radii that approach the planet on relatively low-energy trajectories. -
Starshade Rendezvous Probe
Starshade Rendezvous Probe Starshade Rendezvous Probe Study Report Imaging and Spectra of Exoplanets Orbiting our Nearest Sunlike Star Neighbors with a Starshade in the 2020s February 2019 TEAM MEMBERS Principal Investigators Sara Seager, Massachusetts Institute of Technology N. Jeremy Kasdin, Princeton University Co-Investigators Jeff Booth, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Matt Greenhouse, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Doug Lisman, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Bruce Macintosh, Stanford University Stuart Shaklan, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Melissa Vess, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Steve Warwick, Northrop Grumman Corporation David Webb, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Study Team Andrew Romero-Wolf, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory John Ziemer, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Andrew Gray, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Michael Hughes, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Greg Agnes, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Jon Arenberg, Northrop Grumman Corporation Samuel (Case) Bradford, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Michael Fong, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Jennifer Gregory, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Steve Matousek, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Jonathan Murphy, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Jason Rhodes, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Dan Scharf, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Phil Willems, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Science Team Simone D'Amico, Stanford University John Debes, Space Telescope Science Institute Shawn Domagal-Goldman, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Sergi Hildebrandt, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Renyu Hu, NASA -
Unraveling the Mystery of Exozodiacal Dust
Exploring the Formation and Evolution of Planetary Systems Proceedings IAU Symposium No. 299, 2013 c International Astronomical Union 2013 M. Booth, B. C. Matthews & J. R. Graham, eds. doi:10.1017/S1743921313008843 Unraveling the Mystery of Exozodiacal Dust S. Ertel1, J.-C. Augereau1,P.Th´ebault2,O.Absil3,A.Bonsor1, D. Defr`ere4,Q.Kral2, J.-B. Le Bouquin1, J. Lebreton1, V. Coud´e du Foresto2,5 1 IPAG, UJF Grenoble; 2 LESIA, Observatoire de Paris; 3 Universit´edeLi`ege; 4 Steward Observatory; 5 Bern University Abstract. Exozodiacal dust clouds are thought to be the extrasolar analogs of the Solar Sys- tem’s zodiacal dust. Studying these systems provides insights in the architecture of the innermost regions of planetary systems, including the Habitable Zone. Furthermore, the mere presence of the dust may result in major obstacles for direct imaging of earth-like planets. Our EXOZODI project aims to detect and study exozodiacal dust and to explain its origin. We are carrying out the first large, near-infrared interferometric survey in the northern (CHARA/FLUOR) and southern (VLTI /PIONIER) hemispheres. Preliminary results suggest a detection rate of up to 30% around A to K type stars and interesting trends with spectral type and age. We focus here on presenting the observational work carried out by our team. Keywords. infrared: stars, circumstellar matter, surveys, techniques: interferometric, techniques: high angular resolution 1. How to detect an exozodi The thermal emission from hot exozodiacal dust (typically several hundreds of kelvin up to the sublimation temperature, e.g., Lebreton et al. 2007) results in a near-infrared excess above the stellar flux (typically 1% for known systems). -
Inner Solar System Is Filled with Dust Near the Ecliptic Plane
+ Olivier Absil ISSI team: Exozodiacal dust diks and Darwin Emmanuel Di Folco Hervé Beust Rémy Reche Alexander Krivov Philippe Thébault Torsten Loehne Vincent Coudé du Foresto Bertrand Menesson Pierre Kervella Observations of exozodiacal disks Jean-Charles Augereau LAOG, Grenoble, France Cambridge, August 2009 + Zodiacal dust in the Solar System Within ~2 AU, the inner solar system is filled with dust near the ecliptic plane Origin: tails of comets or when asteroids collide. It’s not a smooth cloud: Dust bands: asteroids families? Dust trails: short period comets? Resonant ring caused by the Earth + Zodiacal dust in the Solar System Tiny total mass : -8 equivalent to a medium-sized asteroid (~ 10 MEarth) But in the form of small grains, it is the most luminous circumsolar component, although it has a low vertical optical thickness (~ 10-7 @ 1AU) Potential noise source for future Earth-like finding missions Motivated several studies to search for exozodiacal, debris disks around nearby stars + Exozodis: observations Small angular separation + High contrast (>1:100) (near)-IR interferometry Direct measurement of disk to star contrast, with a precision of a few 0.1% Rough constraints on the spatial location CHARA interferometer, Mont Wilson + Exozodis: detection principle Non-destructive near-IR interferometry: An exozodiacal disk induces a loss of visibility This deficit is best detected at short baselines Fully resolved for baselines B ~10-30m B~200m Baseline, in meters + Fomalhaut A rich planetary system : HST: a Kuiper Belt, a planet VLTI/VINCI: Exozodiacal dust, that represents 0.88±0.12% of the stellar flux at λ= 2.2µm Absil et al. -
Show Me the Planets! NASA's Exoplanet Exploration Program
Show Me the Planets! NASA’s Exoplanet Exploration Program Dr. Gary Blackwood, Program Manager Dr. Karl Stapelfeldt, Program Chief Engineer Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology April 27, 2017 Caltech Board of Trustees Meeting Pasadena, California © 2017 All rights reserved © 2017 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Artist concept of Kepler-16b Science Updates Discover & Characterize Program Overview: Implementing Astro2010 Priorities Plan Forward: Astro2020 Show Me the Planets! Seven ExoPlanets Above the Fold 2 Trappist-1 Discovery The Richest Set of Earth-sized Planets Ever Found Credit: NASA/JPL 3 A Familiar Habitable Zone Credit: Luc Forsyth 4 Trappist-1: a Relatively Small Star 5 How Spitzer Observed the Trappist-1 System Credit: NASA/JPL 6 Key Takeaways from Trappist Discovery • This is the richest set of Earth-sized exoplanets ever found orbiting a single star, with 3 in the habitable zone. • It shows that red dwarf stars, the most common type of star, can host rich planetary systems. More discoveries like this can be expected • The Trappist exoplanets will be top targets for future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope. The presence and composition of an atmosphere can be measured through infrared spectra taken during transit; but the observations will be difficult. • Most exoplanets do not transit their star. For the general case, direct imaging remains essential for measuring atmospheres and possible biosignatures. 7 LHS 1140: Super Earth, Super Girth A Super Earth in HZ of Red Dwarf at 39 ly • 1.4 Earth radius & 7 earth masses. Surface gravity is > 3x that of the Earth • Bright enough for JWST follow-up, but small scale height will make transit spectroscopy difficult Credit: Dittman et al.