“Social Inequality: Is It a Real Problem? Can It Be Solved?” Wednesday, October 4, 2017 4:30 P.M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

“Social Inequality: Is It a Real Problem? Can It Be Solved?” Wednesday, October 4, 2017 4:30 P.M

Victoria University, the Department of Political Science and the Association of Political Science Students invite you to The Keith Davey Forum on Public Affairs “Social Inequality: Is it a Real Problem? Can it be Solved?” Wednesday, October 4, 2017 4:30 p.m. – 6 p.m. The Isabel Bader Theatre, Victoria University 93 Charles St. W., Toronto Andrew Coyne The Hon. Hugh Segal Stephen LeDrew, Moderator Columnist, Postmedia Founder, Master, Massey College Lawyer and Broadcaster GENERAL SEATING – Doors open at 4:20 p.m. www.vicu.utoronto.ca www.politics.utoronto.ca www.utapss.ca The Keith Davey Forum on Public Affairs “Social Inequality: Is it a Real Problem? Can it be Solved?” Andrew Coyne is national affairs columnist for Postmedia News. Raised in Winnipeg, Mr. Coyne is a graduate of the University of Toronto and the London School of Economics . He has written previously for Maclean’s magazine, The National Post, and The Globe and Mail, contributing as well to a wide range of other publications in Canada and abroad, including The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, National Review, Saturday Night, and The Walrus. He is also a weekly panelist on CBC’s The National. October 4, 2017 4:30 –6:00 p.m. The Honourable Hugh Segal is the fifth master of Massey College, at the University of Toronto, where he is a senior fellow. He is a former chair of the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee, and the Special Senate Committee on anti-terrorism. He has also served as chief of staff to Prime Minister Mulroney. He is a senior strategic advisor at the Aird & Berlis LLP law firm. He graduated from the University of Ottawa with a degree in history in 1972. His public policy focus for many years has been reforming income security in Canada with a basic income guarantee. He is an honorary captain of the Royal Canadian Navy, and most recently, served as Canada’s special envoy. Isabel Bader Theatre 93 Charles Street. W. Stephen LeDrew hosts Live at Noon and appears daily as a commentator on CP24. He engages viewers to watch, listen, think and be entertained. As an analyst, LeDrew provides no shortage of opinions on the matters Canadians care about. Be it on politics, entertainment, sports, or social trends, LeDrew provides thought-provoking insight. LeDrew questions the ability and direction of government and its capacity to do things. He asks the tough questions about Canada’s future as a modern society. He asks the questions viewers often say they would ask if they were doing the asking. A former government advisor and elected national party president, LeDrew brings his experience to the issues at City Hall, Queen’s Park and Parliament Hill, in the streets and in the courts. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Disrupting the Status
DISRUPTING THE STATUS QUO BASIC INCOME FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES Alexandra Creighton Student Number: 215503915 Alex Creighton Final MRP TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... 2 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 6 METHODOLODY ........................................................................................................ 9 BASIC INCOME AND RISKS AND REWARDS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES ......................................................................................................... 23 THEORIES OF EQUALITY, SOCIAL JUSTICE AND BASIC INCOME ............. 28 SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY.................................................................................... 29 TRANSFORMATIVE EQUALITY ........................................................................... 30 EQUALITY OF WELL BEING ................................................................................. 36 DIGNITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS PRINCIPLES ..................................................... 40 STRUCTURAL VIOLENCE AND ODSP ................................................................. 45 STRUCTURAL VIOLENCE IN THE COURTS ....................................................... 47 MATSON ANDREWS AND STRUCTURAL VIOLENCE .......................................
[Show full text]
Canada's Third National Policy: A
+(,121/,1( Citation: 59 U. Toronto L.J. 469 2009 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Mon Dec 23 00:22:02 2013 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do? &operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=1710-1174 Roderick CANADA'S THIRD NATIONAL POLICY: A. Macdonald* & THE EPIPHENOMENAL OR THE Robert Wolfe** REAL CONSTITUTION?t The idea of the NationalPolicy as both a collective endeavour and a framework for detailed policy analysis is more constitutive of the Canadianstate and its governing instruments than is any of its renamed Constitution Acts. Nationalpolicies orig- inate in the actions and demands of citizens and are often framed by cultural and economic elites before being appropriated by politicians. This essay begins with a descriptive genealogy of Canada's three National Policies (NP1, from the 1840s through the 1930s; NP2, from the 1930s through the 1970s; and NP3, from 1980 onward). In subsequent sections, the essay elaborates the principles and components of Canada's contemporary National Policy, based on the notion of embedded citizen agency. It then explores a set of hypotheses about integrative action in the traditionalanalytic registersfor thinking about the National Policy: economic, communications, and social policy. Canada's third National Policy is an emerging fact reflected in a number of initiatives taken by both Liberal and Conservative governments over the past thirty years.
[Show full text]
Bains POWERFUL
Feb2017_Power&Influence_2.pdf 1 1/23/2017 10:36:55 AM The Automotive CANADIAN ICEWINE • INS CHOI Q&A • CANADA 150 EVENTS Industry is CHANGING. So are we. C M Let us show you how. IS POLITICAL TOP Y POLLING DEAD? CM Those with the most MY aiaofcanada at stake debate the CY uncertain future aiacanada.com/welcomegov of forecasting CMY K 100 EXPORTING most A CANADIAN SUCCESS STORY POWERFUL Why other countries & INFLUENTIAL are looking to Canada in the midst of the IN GOVERNMENT global refugee crisis & POLITICS IN 2017 NAVDEEP BAINS The ‘MiniSTER OF E VERYTHING’ $6.99 Winter 2017 The Voice and the Resource hilltimes.com/power-influence for the automotive aftermarket industry in Canada test.indd 1 17-01-26 11:48 AM AbbotsfordAbbotsford 2016 2016 BC SummerBC Summer Games, Games, Abbotsford Abbotsford • Association • Association of Ontario of Ontario Health Health Centres, Centres, Toronto Toronto • Athabasca • Athabasca District District Minor Minor Hockey Hockey Association, Association, Athabasca Athabasca • Autisme• Autisme Sans Sans Limites, Limites, Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu • • Babas Babas & & Borshch Borshch Ukrainian Ukrainian Festival Festival Society, Society, Andrew Andrew •• BigBig BrothersBrothers BigBig SistersSisters of Greater Halifax, Dartmouth • Broadbent AbbotsfordAbbotsford 2016 2016 BC Summer BC Summer Games, Games, Abbotsford Abbotsford • Association • Association of Ontario of Ontario Health Health Centres, Centres, Toronto Toronto • Athabasca • Athabasca District District Minor Minor Hockey Hockey
[Show full text]
Forty-Ninth Parallel Constitutionalism: How Canadians Invoke American Constitutional Traditions
FORTY-NINTH PARALLEL CONSTITUTIONALISM: HOW CANADIANS INVOKE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL TRADITIONS I. INTRODUCTION While a debate over citing foreign law rages in America, Canadian constitutional discourse references the United States with frequency, familiarity, and no second thoughts. This is nothing new. After all, Canada’s original constitutional framework was in some ways a reac- tion against American constitutionalism.1 Similarly, the drafters of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,2 passed in 1982, took care- ful account of the American Bill of Rights.3 Nevertheless, today’s burgeoning of comparative constitutionalism invites a closer and more structured look at the role America plays in Canadian constitutional discourse. As comparative constitutionalists strive for methodological discipline,4 setting out criteria for how and when foreign constitutional experience should be employed, the Cana- dian example, with its rich references to American constitutionalism, serves as a useful case study.5 This Note proposes a framework for understanding the ways in which Canadian constitutional discourse invokes American constitu- tionalism. Canadian political and legal actors, it suggests, use Ameri- can sources in three ways: as a model to follow, as an anti-model to avoid, and as a dialogical resource for reflecting on Canada’s own con- stitutional identity.6 Each of these positions, moreover, is situated ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 1 See PETER H. RUSSELL, CONSTITUTIONAL ODYSSEY 12 (3d ed. 2004) (“[The] basic con- stitutional assumptions [at the time of Confederation] were those of Burke and the Whig constitu- tional settlement of 1689 rather than of Locke and the American Constitution.”); id. at 23 (de- scribing how the Fathers of Confederation saw American federalism as “thoroughly flawed”).
[Show full text]
Asper Nation Other Books by Marc Edge
Asper Nation other books by marc edge Pacific Press: The Unauthorized Story of Vancouver’s Newspaper Monopoly Red Line, Blue Line, Bottom Line: How Push Came to Shove Between the National Hockey League and Its Players ASPER NATION Canada’s Most Dangerous Media Company Marc Edge NEW STAR BOOKS VANCOUVER 2007 new star books ltd. 107 — 3477 Commercial Street | Vancouver, bc v5n 4e8 | canada 1574 Gulf Rd., #1517 | Point Roberts, wa 98281 | usa www.NewStarBooks.com | [email protected] Copyright Marc Edge 2007. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior written consent of the publisher or a licence from the Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (access Copyright). Publication of this work is made possible by the support of the Canada Council, the Government of Canada through the Department of Cana- dian Heritage Book Publishing Industry Development Program, the British Columbia Arts Council, and the Province of British Columbia through the Book Publishing Tax Credit. Printed and bound in Canada by Marquis Printing, Cap-St-Ignace, QC First printing, October 2007 library and archives canada cataloguing in publication Edge, Marc, 1954– Asper nation : Canada’s most dangerous media company / Marc Edge. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 978-1-55420-032-0 1. CanWest Global Communications Corp. — History. 2. Asper, I.H., 1932–2003. I. Title. hd2810.12.c378d34 2007 384.5506'571 c2007–903983–9 For the Clarks – Lynda, Al, Laura, Spencer, and Chloe – and especially their hot tub, without which this book could never have been written.
[Show full text]
Institute of Commonwealth Studies
University of London INSTITUTE OF COMMONWEALTH STUDIES VOICE FILE NAME: COHP Hugh Segal (Part One) Key: SO: Dr Sue Onslow (Interviewer) HS: Senator Hugh Segal (Respondent) Part One: SO: This is Sue Onslow talking to Senator Hugh Segal at the Royal Commonwealth Society in London on Wednesday, 13th March 2013. Senator Segal, thank you very much indeed for agreeing to talk to me. I wondered if you could begin by saying, in a general way, what has informed your views towards the Commonwealth in your political career. HS: I'd say probably two things. When I was very young, Her Majesty came to my part of Montreal to open the St Lawrence Seaway. I would have been eight years old. It was 1959, Her Majesty was a young queen – I would say about thirty-three or thirty-two – and she looked very radiant. She came to speak in our small town hall in the northwest part of the city, and when someone – my father – explained to me who she was, what she did, what the Commonwealth was, that she was the head of the Church of England and that this was about everybody being equal under the Crown, that began my interest in what this sort of highly external force might mean in the life of an immigrant kid like myself, number one. Then, the politics really came from my association with the Conservative party. I joined the Conservative party when John Diefenbaker was Prime Minister, so we're looking at 1963. I was thirteen, and my daughter now would say, "Dad, that's the nerdiest thing I've ever heard about you." SO: I'm sorry, but I agree with your daughter! HS: I agree! But I did that because Diefenbaker was very much a politician who was focused on – as many Conservative politicians are – what are our roots, what are our binding histories, what is the nature of our country.
[Show full text]
Edmund Burke, John Whyte and Themes in Canadian Constitutional Culture
Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2006 Edmund Burke, John Whyte and Themes in Canadian Constitutional Culture David Schneiderman Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/207 31 Queen's L.J. 578-597 (2006) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Legal History Commons GEORGETOWN LAW Faculty Publications February 2010 Edmund Burke, John Whyte and Themes in Canadian Constitutional Culture 31 Queen's L.J. 578-597 (2006) David Schneiderman Visiting Professor of Law Georgetown University Law Center [email protected] This paper can be downloaded without charge from: Scholarly Commons: http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/207/ SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1434674 Posted with permission of the author Edmund Burke, John Whyte and Themes in Canadian Constitutional Culture David Schneiderman 'f John U7hyte, the author observes, is committed to the idea that there are moral foundations to Canada's constitutional order and that these foundations are derived from liberal principles. This paper compares U7hyte's liberal and organ!cist constitutionalism to that of the eightennth century British political thinker, Edmund Burke. Three themes are predominant in U7hyte's work: those of liberty and security, unity and diversity, and constitutional change. Drawing out these themes in both U7hyte's and Burke's constitutional thought, the author argues that U7hyte has a sound historical basis for deriving Canadian constitutional practices from liberal principles ordinarily associated with Burke.
[Show full text]
Harper's Canada John E. Trent Bibliography Aucoin , Peter, Mark D
1 Harper’s Canada John E. Trent Bibliography Aucoin , Peter, Mark D. Jarvis , Lori Turnbull (2011). Democratizing the Constitution: Reforming Responsible Government, Toronto, Emond Montgomery. Avaaz,(2008). “The Worst leader in the World?” Canada in Action ad. Ottawa Citizen, 8-08-08. Boily, Frédérick (2010). Le conservatisme au Québec, Québec, Les Presses de l’Université Laval. Bourrie, Mark (2015). Kill the Messengers: Stephen Harper’s Assault on Your Right to Know. Patrick Crean Editions Bower, Tom (2006). Conrad and Lady Black: Dancing on the Edge, London, HarperCollins. Bricker, Darrell and John Ibbitson (2013). The Big Shift, Toronto, Harper Collins. Clark, Hon. Joe (2013). How We Lead: Canada in a Century of Change, Toronto, Random House Canada. Clark, Scott and Peter De Vries (2014). ‘Jim Flaherty’s legacy of failure’, http://www.ipolitics.ca/2014/03/20/jim-flahertys-legacy-of-failure/ Coyne, Andrew (2013). ‘Six Degrees of Stephen Harper’, Ottawa Citizen, 22-06-13. Dobbin, Murray (2011). ‘A party of thugs, liars, cheats, crooks, dirty tricksters – and Christians’, for the Canadian Unitarians for Social Justice, [email protected] , 26-02-11. Dyck, Rand (5th ed. 2008). Canadian Politics: Critical Approaches, Toronto, Nelson-Thomson. Engler, Yves (2012). The Ugly Canadian: Stephen Harper’s Foreign Policy, Fernwood Publishing Finn, Ed (2013). ‘Elaborate takeover scheme gives corporations absolute power’, Ottawa, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, CCPA Monitor, July. Galloway, Gloria (2013). ‘Is Canada’s party discipline strictest in the world? Experts say yes’, Globe and Mail, 7-02-13. Gidengil, Elizabeth & Heather Bastedo (eds)(2014). Canadian Democracy from the Ground Up, UBC Press Gutstein, Donald (2014).
[Show full text]
Whither Wagner? Reconsidering Labor Law and Policy Reform
Article Whither Wagner? Reconsidering Labor Law and Policy Reform Sara Slinn† INTRODUCTION It is an interesting moment to contemplate the future of North American labor law and labor relations. Canada and the United States initially adopted similar labor relations legal frameworks, the Canadian framework a variation of the United States’ 1935 National Labor Relations Act (generally referred to as the “Wagner Act” or the “Wagner model”).1 However, the Wagner model has played out very differently in the two coun- tries. A key indicator of this difference is the divergent trajecto- ries of changing union density over the last sixty years in Can- ada and the United States. In contrast with the severe, sustained decline in unionization in the United States, Canada experienced a longer period of growth, slower decline, and—in recent decades—a fairly stable level of unionization.2 Will the labor relations experiences of these closely linked nations con- tinue to diverge, or will Canada’s labor relations landscape come to resemble that of the United States, and what might be the implications for labor law? In addressing this question, this Article proceeds in six Parts. Part I briefly introduces the interconnected origins of United States and Canadian labor law frameworks. Part II surveys the unionization experience, and reviews possible ex- planations for the persistent and growing divergence in union † Associate Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University. The author thanks the Symposium organizers, Minnesota Law Review editors, and the archives at the University of Toronto Centre for Industrial Relations & Human Resources, Newman Library, for their valuable assistance with this Article.
[Show full text]
Next Steps on the Road to Basic Income in Canada
The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare Volume 43 Issue 3 September Article 4 2016 Next Steps on the Road to Basic Income in Canada James Mulvale University of Manitoba, [email protected] Sid Frankel University of Manitoba, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw Part of the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation Mulvale, James and Frankel, Sid (2016) "Next Steps on the Road to Basic Income in Canada," The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare: Vol. 43 : Iss. 3 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol43/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you by the Western Michigan University School of Social Work. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Next Steps on the Road to Basic Income in Canada JAMES P. MULVALE SID FRANKEL Faculty of Social Work University of Manitoba Canada has had recurring debates about guaranteed or basic income over several decades. This article outlines reasons for implementing basic income in the Canadian context—reduc- ing poverty and inequality, addressing precarious employ- ment, and building an ecologically sustainable economy. Recently there has been a strong renewal of interest in basic income in Canada. Expressions of interest have come from the Liberal federal government elected in 2015, from provincial governments, from political parties not in power, and from mu- nicipal governments. Support for basic income also is found in a growing range of prominent individuals and organizations. While basic income advocates are encouraged by recent develop- ments, several large and complex questions remain on how this ap- proach can be implemented in Canada.
[Show full text]
Basic Income for Working-Age Canadians: a Comprehensive Perspective
This report was prepared on Treaty 6 territory Basic Income for Working-Age Canadians: A Comprehensive Perspective Edmonton Centre Youth Council Economic Inequality Subcommittee Chris Wiebe December 2017 1 Table Of Contents Recommendations 2 Introduction 2 History of Basic Income 3 Basic Income In Canada 4 Basic Income Basics 5 Basic Income & Welfare 6 Basic Income & Labour 8 Basic Income & Education 11 Basic Income & Health 12 Basic Income & Gender Inequality 13 Basic Income & Indigenous Jurisdictions 14 Financing A Basic Income 15 Conclusion 16 Acknowledgments 18 Bibliography 19 2 RECOMMENDATIONS For the reasons stated in the sections below, the Edmonton Centre Youth Council (ECYC) recommends that the Government of Canada consider the following measures: 1) Ultimately, we ask that the Government of Canada to Institute a federal monthly basic income of roughly $22,000 per year for Canadians age 18-64 using a NIT or UD model. If using a NIT, the benefit reduction rate must be 40% or less. Such a program must not be paid for by cuts to other anti-poverty measures like employment programs, the National Housing Strategy, healthcare, or education 2) As an imperative first step, we ask that the Government of Canada use the philosophy of a basic income as an ideal around which to frame a new discussion about welfare reform with provincial governments. We ask that the Government of Canada encourage and financially enable provinces to adopt the following reforms to existing welfare legislation: a) Increase allowances to allow for an adequate
[Show full text]
Debating the Anti-Terrorism Legislation: Cessons Learned
Debating the Anti-Terrorism Legislation: Cessons Learned by Alex Mazer Bill C-36, Canada's anti-terrorism bill, was drafted under extraordinary circum- 2003 CanLIIDocs 258 stances, and was the subject of an extraordinary debate within and without Parlia- ment. This article describes the legislative process and broader societal debate surrounding Bill C-36. Furthermore, it argues that three central Tessons can be Learned from studying the discussions of the Bill: that the legislative process should be "internationalized" to correspond with increasingly international Law and policy; that parliamentary committees can and should be empowered to play an important role in formulating policy; and that emergency legislation poses grave dangers and should be made as temporary as possible. ill C-36, the Anti-Terrorism Act, was the The Legislative Process Govenunent's legislative response to the terrorist Battacks of 11 September 2001, and Canada's Bill C-36 was introduced in the House by Justice Minis- domestic contribution to an international legal effort to ter Anne McLellan on 15 October 2001. It was the result of suppress terrorism. In the aftermath of September 11, the intensified, accelerated work by Department of Justice United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, officiais. Assistant Deputy Minister Richard Mosley, and Australia, inter alla, all passed bills with purported speaking at a University of Toronto conference on the objectives similar to those of C-36. Bill, described the behind-the-scenes process by which Bill C-36 was complex, cross-jurisdictional, and un- the legislation came into being. Immediately after 11 precedented. It received more public attention than al- September, Mosley said, the department conducted a re- most any bai in recent memory.
[Show full text]