A Global Perspective on Vasoactive Agents in Shock Djillali Annane1*, Lamia Ouanes‑Besbes2, Daniel De Backer3, Bin DU4, Anthony C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Global Perspective on Vasoactive Agents in Shock Djillali Annane1*, Lamia Ouanes‑Besbes2, Daniel De Backer3, Bin DU4, Anthony C Intensive Care Med https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5242-5 REVIEW A global perspective on vasoactive agents in shock Djillali Annane1*, Lamia Ouanes‑Besbes2, Daniel de Backer3, Bin DU4, Anthony C. Gordon5, Glenn Hernández6, Keith M. Olsen7, Tifany M. Osborn8, Sandra Peake9,10, James A. Russell11 and Sergio Zanotti Cavazzoni12 © 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature and ESICM Abstract Purpose: We set out to summarize the current knowledge on vasoactive drugs and their use in the management of shock to inform physicians’ practices. Methods: This is a narrative review by a multidisciplinary, multinational—from six continents—panel of experts including physicians, a pharmacist, trialists, and scientists. Results and conclusions: Vasoactive drugs are an essential part of shock management. Catecholamines are the most commonly used vasoactive agents in the intensive care unit, and among them norepinephrine is the frst-line therapy in most clinical conditions. Inotropes are indicated when myocardial function is depressed and dobutamine remains the frst-line therapy. Vasoactive drugs have a narrow therapeutic spectrum and expose the patients to potentially lethal complications. Thus, these agents require precise therapeutic targets, close monitoring with titration to the minimal efcacious dose and should be weaned as promptly as possible. Moreover, the use of vasoactive drugs in shock requires an individualized approach. Vasopressin and possibly angiotensin II may be useful owing to their norepinephrine-sparing efects. Keywords: Shock, Cardiovascular system, Adrenergic agonists, Clinical trials, Practice guidelines Introduction review provides a summary of current knowledge about Acute illnesses are often characterized by a loss in cardio- vasopressors and inotropes to guide intensive care physi- vascular homeostasis. Underlying mechanisms may include cians’ practices when managing patients with shock. multiple factors altering blood volume (actual or efective), cardiac (diastolic and/or systolic) function or the vessels Pharmacological basis (large vessels and/or microvasculature). Vasopressors and Catecholamines inotropes are vasoactive drugs that have been developed Vasoactive agents are classifed into sympathomimet- to act on the vessels and the heart. In practice, a number ics, vasopressin analogues, and angiotensin II. Catecho- of drugs are available with heterogeneous mechanisms of lamines are further subdivided in categories of indirect, action and varying beneft to risk balance. Tis narrative mixed-acting, and direct acting. Only the direct acting agents have a role in shock. Direct agents are further *Correspondence: [email protected] delineated by their selective nature (e.g., dobutamine, 1 General ICU, Raymond Poincaré Hospital (APHP), School of Medicine phenylephrine) or non-selective activity (e.g., epineph- Simone Veil U1173 Laboratory of Infection and Infammation (University of Versailles SQY, University Paris Saclay/INSERM), CRICS-TRIGERSEP rine, norepinephrine) on α1, α2, β1, β2, and β3 receptors [1]. Network (F-CRIN), 104 boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92380 Garches, Catecholamines are most often linked to clinical improve- France ment in shock states [1, 2]. Catecholamines act by stimu- Full author information is available at the end of the article lation of either α or β receptors, exerting excitatory action All authors have equally contributed to this manuscript. on smooth muscle and resulting in vasoconstrictive or vasodilatory efects in skin, kidney, and lung. Intravenous decreased lung oedema and fuid balance more than vaso- (IV) administration of epinephrine or norepinephrine pressin and control groups with concomitant mitigation of results in increasing blood pressure with increasing dose. decreased plasma total protein concentration and oncotic Te rise in blood pressure is due to vasoconstriction and pressure [16]. β receptor stimulation. β-stimulation directly increases inotropy and heart rate. Although receptor responses Calcium sensitizers have classically been presented as linear, all responses fol- Calcium sensitizers produce their inotropic efect by low a sigmoidal type curve resulting in a pharmacological sensitizing the myocardium to existing calcium, rather response to increasing doses followed by a plateau afect. than increasing intracellular concentrations. Tis has the Dopamine receptors include at least fve subtypes that advantage of producing increased myocardial contraction are broadly distributed in the central nervous system, in (inotropy) without the same increases in oxygen demand pulmonary and systemic blood vessels, cardiac tissues as other inotropes. Furthermore, as calcium levels fall in and the kidneys [1]. Te impact on receptors provides the diastole, calcium sensitizers do not impair relaxation in pharmacologic basis for catecholamine therapy in shock. the same way as other inotropes. Clinicians should also be aware of their efects on glycog- Levosimendan is the only calcium sensitizer in clinical enolysis in the liver and smooth muscle, free fatty acid use [17]. Opening of ATP-sensitive potassium channels release from adipose tissue, modulation of insulin release in vascular smooth muscle results in vasodilatation and and uptake, immune modulation, and psychomotor activ- through actions in the mitochondria of cardiomyocytes, ity in the central nervous system. it is reported as cardioprotective in ischaemic episodes. At higher doses it also exhibits phosphodiesterase III Vasopressin and analogues inhibitor efects. Although the parent drug has a short Vasopressin is a potent nonapeptide vasopressor hormone half-life of about 1 h, an active metabolite, OR1896, has released by the posterior pituitary gland in response to a long half-life and therefore a 24-h infusion of levo- hypotension and hypernatremia [3]. Vasopressin stimu- simendan can have haemodynamic efects for about lates a family of receptors—V1a (vasoconstriction), V1b 1 week. (ACTH release), V2 (anti-diuretic efects), oxytocin (vaso- dilator) and purinergic receptors (of limited relevance to Selective beta‑1 antagonists septic shock). Vasopressin paradoxically induces synthesis Although sympathetic stimulation is an appropriate phys- of nitric oxide (NO) [4]. NO may limit vasopressin’s vaso- iological response to sepsis there is evidence that if exces- constriction, while preserving renal perfusion [5]. How- sive this can become pathological [18]. Both high levels ever, it may also contribute to vasopressin/NO-induced of circulating catecholamines and tachycardia have been cardiac depression. Notably, V1a-receptor activation of associated with increased mortality in septic shock [19]. vascular smooth muscle induced vasoconstriction is cat- Although myocardial dysfunction is common in sepsis, echolamine-independent and may explain why vasopressin short-acting β1 antagonists may have benefcial cardio- complements norepinephrine in septic shock. Te main vascular efects through slowing heart rate, improving rationale for vasopressin infusion in septic shock is well- diastolic function and coronary perfusion [20]. Esmolol is established. Vasopressin defciency in early septic shock a cardioselective β1 receptor antagonist with rapid onset [6] is due to depletion of vasopressin stores and inadequate and very short duration of action [21]. Landiolol is an synthesis and release from the hypothalamic-pituitary ultra-short acting β blocker about eight times more selec- axis. Low dose vasopressin infusion of 0.01–0.04 units/ tive for the β1 receptor than esmolol [22]. min, increased blood pressure and decreased norepineph- rine requirements [6–10]. Vasopressin defciency and its Others anti-diuretic efects only become apparent later, during Historically, angiotensin was recognized as a potent vaso- septic shock recovery with about 60% of patients having constrictor [23]. Angiotensin increases blood pressure inadequate vasopressin responses to an osmotic challenge mainly by stimulating NADH/NADPH membrane bound 5 days post recovery from septic shock [11]. Highly selec- oxidase with subsequent oxygen production by vascu- tive V1a agonists could have better efects in septic shock lar smooth muscles [24]. Recently, a synthetic human than vasopressin because of the narrow focus on the V1a angiotensin II was shown to act synergistically with nor- receptor [12]. In addition to minimizing V2 anti-diuresis, epinephrine to increase blood pressure in patients with less or no von Willebrand factor release is reported (V2 vasodilator shock [25]. Methylene blue and non-selective mediated) and there is some evidence in animal models of inhibitors of NO synthase induced vasoconstriction by less vascular leak with V1a agonists compared to vasopres- modulating endothelial vascular relaxation, and phos- sin [13–16]. Te highly selective V1a agonist selepressin phodiesterase type III inhibitors exert inotropic efects and vasodilation by modulating cyclic AMP metabolism pressure [1]. Norepinephrine also increases stroke vol- [26]. ume and coronary blood fow partly by stimulating cor- onary vessel β2-receptors [32]. Tese potential positive Cardiovascular efects efects of norepinephrine on cardiac function are often Efects of catecholamines on the cardiovascular system transient. Epinephrine is a much more powerful stimu- are summarized in Fig. 1. lant of cardiac function than norepinephrine, i.e., has more β-adrenergic efects. Epinephrine accelerates heart Efects on the heart rate, improves cardiac conduction, stimulates the
Recommended publications
  • Product List March 2019 - Page 1 of 53
    Wessex has been sourcing and supplying active substances to medicine manufacturers since its incorporation in 1994. We supply from known, trusted partners working to full cGMP and with full regulatory support. Please contact us for details of the following products. Product CAS No. ( R)-2-Methyl-CBS-oxazaborolidine 112022-83-0 (-) (1R) Menthyl Chloroformate 14602-86-9 (+)-Sotalol Hydrochloride 959-24-0 (2R)-2-[(4-Ethyl-2, 3-dioxopiperazinyl) carbonylamino]-2-phenylacetic 63422-71-9 acid (2R)-2-[(4-Ethyl-2-3-dioxopiperazinyl) carbonylamino]-2-(4- 62893-24-7 hydroxyphenyl) acetic acid (r)-(+)-α-Lipoic Acid 1200-22-2 (S)-1-(2-Chloroacetyl) pyrrolidine-2-carbonitrile 207557-35-5 1,1'-Carbonyl diimidazole 530-62-1 1,3-Cyclohexanedione 504-02-9 1-[2-amino-1-(4-methoxyphenyl) ethyl] cyclohexanol acetate 839705-03-2 1-[2-Amino-1-(4-methoxyphenyl) ethyl] cyclohexanol Hydrochloride 130198-05-9 1-[Cyano-(4-methoxyphenyl) methyl] cyclohexanol 93413-76-4 1-Chloroethyl-4-nitrophenyl carbonate 101623-69-2 2-(2-Aminothiazol-4-yl) acetic acid Hydrochloride 66659-20-9 2-(4-Nitrophenyl)ethanamine Hydrochloride 29968-78-3 2,4 Dichlorobenzyl Alcohol (2,4 DCBA) 1777-82-8 2,6-Dichlorophenol 87-65-0 2.6 Diamino Pyridine 136-40-3 2-Aminoheptane Sulfate 6411-75-2 2-Ethylhexanoyl Chloride 760-67-8 2-Ethylhexyl Chloroformate 24468-13-1 2-Isopropyl-4-(N-methylaminomethyl) thiazole Hydrochloride 908591-25-3 4,4,4-Trifluoro-1-(4-methylphenyl)-1,3-butane dione 720-94-5 4,5,6,7-Tetrahydrothieno[3,2,c] pyridine Hydrochloride 28783-41-7 4-Chloro-N-methyl-piperidine 5570-77-4
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Ernesto Lopez 2015
    Copyright by Ernesto Lopez 2015 The Dissertation Committee for Ernesto Lopez Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: The role of arginine vasopressin receptor 2 in microvascular hyperpermeability during severe sepsis and septic shock Committee: Perenlei Enkhbaatar, M.D., Ph.D. Supervisor or Mentor, Chair Jose M. Barral M.D., Ph.D. Donald S. Prough, M.D. Robert A. Cox, Ph.D. Jae-Woo Lee, M.D. _______________________________ David W. Niesel, PhD. Dean, Graduate School The role of arginine vasopressin receptor 2 in microvascular hyperpermeability during severe sepsis and septic shock by Ernesto Lopez, M.D. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas Medical Branch in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas Medical Branch 2015 Acknowledgements First I would like to gratefully thank my mentor, Dr. Enkhbaatar for his dedication and support and for giving me the opportunity to work in his lab as a graduate student. Dr. Enkhbaatar helped me to improve my scientific and professional skills with great attention. I had a true opportunity to be exposed to every aspect of the biomedical sciences. Moreover, I would like to express my gratitude to the members of my dissertation committee Dr. Prough, Dr. Cox, Dr. Barral and Dr. Lee as well as Dr. Hawkins, Dr. Herndon, Dr. Rojas and Jacob MS, for all the critiques and ideas that certainly enhanced this project. I would also like to thank to all current and past members of the translational intensive care unit (TICU) for their enormous support and professionalism in completing this project; John Salsbury, Christina Nelson, Ashley Smith, Timothy Walker, Mackenzie Gallegos, Jisoo Kim, Uma Nwikoro, Ryan Scott, Jeffrey Jinkins, Lesia Tower, Cindy Moncebaiz, Cindy Hallum, Lindsey Willis, Paul Walden, Randi Bolding, Jameisha Lee, Mengyi Ye, as well as Drs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework for Assurance of Medication Safety Using Machine Learning
    A Framework for Assurance of Medication Safety using Machine Learning Yan Jia1 Tom Lawton2 John McDermid1 Eric Rojas3 Ibrahim Habli1 Abstract— Medication errors continue to be the leading cause of avoidable patient harm in hospitals. This paper sets out a framework to assure medication safety that combines machine learning and safety engineering methods. It uses safety analysis to proactively identify potential causes of medication error, based on expert opinion. As healthcare is now data rich, it is possible to augment safety analysis with machine learning to discover actual causes of medication error from the data, and to identify where they deviate from what was predicted in the safety analysis. Combining these two views has the potential to enable the risk of medication errors to be managed proactively and dynamically. We apply the framework to a case study involving thoracic surgery, e.g. oesophagectomy, where errors in giving beta-blockers can be critical to control atrial fibrillation. This case study combines a HAZOP-based safety analysis method known as SHARD with Bayesian network structure learning and process mining to produce the analysis results, showing the potential of the framework for ensuring patient safety, and for transforming the way that safety is managed in complex healthcare environments. Keywords—medication safety, machine learning, proactive safety management 1. INTRODUCTION Safety analysis is both predictive and reactive. It aims to identify hazards, hazard causes and mitigations, and associated risks before a system is deployed. The system is then monitored during its deployment to manage risks. When systems are used in highly controlled environments, built using components with a long service history, these predictions can be accurate.
    [Show full text]
  • Ready, Set, (Vaso)Action! Vasoactive Agents for Catecholamine Refractory
    Lights, Camera, (Vaso)Action! Vasoactive Agents for Catecholamine Refractory Septic Shock Gregory Kelly, Pharm.D. PGY2 Emergency Medicine Pharmacy Resident University of Rochester Medical Center October 28, 2017 Conflicts of Interest I have no conflicts of interest to disclose Presentation Objectives 1. Discuss the currently available literature evaluating angiotensin II as a treatment modality for septic shock. 2. Interpret the results of the ATHOS-3 trial and its applicability to the management of patients with septic shock. Vasopressin Vasopressin: A History Case series of vasopressin First case report deficiency in in severe shock septic shock 1960-80’s 1954 1957 1997 2003 Vasopressin Use of First RCT first vasopressin for suggesting synthesized GI superiority of hemorrhage, vasopressin + diabetes norepinephrine to insipidus and norepinephrine ileus alone Matis-Gradwohl I, et al. Crit Care. 2013;17:1002. VAAST Trial: design VASST Trial Design Mutlicenter, international, randomized, double-blind trial • n = 778 Population • Refractory septic shock Intervention Vasopressin 0.01-0.03 units/min vs. Norepinephrine alone Russell JA, et al. New Engl J Med. 2008;358:877-87. Drug Titration Vasopressin start at 0.01 units/min Titrate by 0.005 units/min Every 10 minutes to reach max of 0.03 units/min MAP ≥65-70mmHg MAP <65-70mmHg Decrease Increase norepinephrine by norepinephrine 1-2 mcg/min every 5-10 minutes Russell JA, et al. New Engl J Med. 2008;358:877-87. Norepinephrine Requirements Norepinephrine Vasopressin Russell JA, et al. New Engl J Med. 2008;358:877-87. Mortality 450 Day 28 Day 90 400 P = 0.27 P = 0.10 350 300 250 200 150 Patients Alive Patients 100 50 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Days Since Drug Initiation Vasopressin Norepinephrine Russell JA, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification Decisions Taken by the Harmonized System Committee from the 47Th to 60Th Sessions (2011
    CLASSIFICATION DECISIONS TAKEN BY THE HARMONIZED SYSTEM COMMITTEE FROM THE 47TH TO 60TH SESSIONS (2011 - 2018) WORLD CUSTOMS ORGANIZATION Rue du Marché 30 B-1210 Brussels Belgium November 2011 Copyright © 2011 World Customs Organization. All rights reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning translation, reproduction and adaptation rights should be addressed to [email protected]. D/2011/0448/25 The following list contains the classification decisions (other than those subject to a reservation) taken by the Harmonized System Committee ( 47th Session – March 2011) on specific products, together with their related Harmonized System code numbers and, in certain cases, the classification rationale. Advice Parties seeking to import or export merchandise covered by a decision are advised to verify the implementation of the decision by the importing or exporting country, as the case may be. HS codes Classification No Product description Classification considered rationale 1. Preparation, in the form of a powder, consisting of 92 % sugar, 6 % 2106.90 GRIs 1 and 6 black currant powder, anticaking agent, citric acid and black currant flavouring, put up for retail sale in 32-gram sachets, intended to be consumed as a beverage after mixing with hot water. 2. Vanutide cridificar (INN List 100). 3002.20 3. Certain INN products. Chapters 28, 29 (See “INN List 101” at the end of this publication.) and 30 4. Certain INN products. Chapters 13, 29 (See “INN List 102” at the end of this publication.) and 30 5. Certain INN products. Chapters 28, 29, (See “INN List 103” at the end of this publication.) 30, 35 and 39 6. Re-classification of INN products.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016
    Annexes to the annual report of the European Medicines Agency 2016 Annex 1 – Members of the Management Board ............................................................... 2 Annex 2 - Members of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use ...................... 4 Annex 3 – Members of the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee ........................ 6 Annex 4 – Members of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use ................. 8 Annex 5 – Members of the Committee on Orphan Medicinal Products .............................. 10 Annex 6 – Members of the Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products ................................ 12 Annex 7 – Committee for Advanced Therapies .............................................................. 14 Annex 8 – Members of the Paediatric Committee .......................................................... 16 Annex 9 – Working parties and working groups ............................................................ 18 Annex 10 – CHMP opinions: initial evaluations and extensions of therapeutic indication ..... 24 Annex 10a – Guidelines and concept papers adopted by CHMP in 2016 ............................ 25 Annex 11 – CVMP opinions in 2016 on medicinal products for veterinary use .................... 33 Annex 11a – 2016 CVMP opinions on extensions of indication for medicinal products for veterinary use .......................................................................................................... 39 Annex 11b – Guidelines and concept papers adopted by CVMP in 2016 ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Septic Shock Management Guided by Ultrasound: a Randomized Control Trial (SEPTICUS Trial)
    Septic Shock Management Guided by Ultrasound: A Randomized Control Trial (SEPTICUS Trial) RESEARCH PROTOCOL dr. Saptadi Yuliarto, Sp.A(K), MKes PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY AND INTENSIVE THERAPY SAIFUL ANWAR GENERAL HOSPITAL, MALANG MEDICAL FACULTY OF BRAWIJAYA UNIVERSITY DECEMBER 30, 2020 1 SUMMARY Research Title Septic Shock Management Guided by Ultrasound: A Randomized Control Trial (SEPTICUS Trial) Research Design A multicentre experimental study in pediatric patients with a diagnosis of septic shock. Research Objective To examine the differences in fluid resuscitation outcomes for septic shock patients with the USSM and mACCM protocols • Patient mortality rate • Differences in clinical parameters • Differences in macrocirculation hemodynamic parameters • Differences in microcirculation laboratory parameters Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Inclusion: Pediatric patients (1 month - 18 years old), diagnosed with septic shock Exclusion: patients with congenital heart defects, already receiving fluid resuscitation or inotropic-vasoactive drugs prior to study recruitment, patients after cardiac surgery Research Setting A multicenter study conducted in all pediatric intensive care units (HCU / PICU), emergency department (IGD), and pediatric wards in participating hospitals in Indonesia. Sample Size Calculating the minimum sample size using the clinical trial formula for the mortality rate, obtained a sample size of 340 samples. Research Period The study was carried out in the period January 2021 to December 2022 Data Collection Process Pediatric patients who met the study inclusion criteria were randomly divided into 2 groups, namely the intervention group (USSM protocol) or the control group (mACCM protocol). Patients who respond well to resuscitation will have their outcome analyzed in the first hour (15-60 minutes). Patients with fluid refractory shock will have their output analyzed at 6 hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Ehealth DSI [Ehdsi V2.2.2-OR] Ehealth DSI – Master Value Set
    MTC eHealth DSI [eHDSI v2.2.2-OR] eHealth DSI – Master Value Set Catalogue Responsible : eHDSI Solution Provider PublishDate : Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 1 of 490 MTC Table of Contents epSOSActiveIngredient 4 epSOSAdministrativeGender 148 epSOSAdverseEventType 149 epSOSAllergenNoDrugs 150 epSOSBloodGroup 155 epSOSBloodPressure 156 epSOSCodeNoMedication 157 epSOSCodeProb 158 epSOSConfidentiality 159 epSOSCountry 160 epSOSDisplayLabel 167 epSOSDocumentCode 170 epSOSDoseForm 171 epSOSHealthcareProfessionalRoles 184 epSOSIllnessesandDisorders 186 epSOSLanguage 448 epSOSMedicalDevices 458 epSOSNullFavor 461 epSOSPackage 462 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 2 of 490 MTC epSOSPersonalRelationship 464 epSOSPregnancyInformation 466 epSOSProcedures 467 epSOSReactionAllergy 470 epSOSResolutionOutcome 472 epSOSRoleClass 473 epSOSRouteofAdministration 474 epSOSSections 477 epSOSSeverity 478 epSOSSocialHistory 479 epSOSStatusCode 480 epSOSSubstitutionCode 481 epSOSTelecomAddress 482 epSOSTimingEvent 483 epSOSUnits 484 epSOSUnknownInformation 487 epSOSVaccine 488 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 3 of 490 MTC epSOSActiveIngredient epSOSActiveIngredient Value Set ID 1.3.6.1.4.1.12559.11.10.1.3.1.42.24 TRANSLATIONS Code System ID Code System Version Concept Code Description (FSN) 2.16.840.1.113883.6.73 2017-01 A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 2.16.840.1.113883.6.73 2017-01
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Advances in Therapeutic Peptides Targeting G Protein-Coupled
    Advances in therapeutic peptides targeting G protein-coupled receptors Anthony P. Davenport1Ϯ Conor C.G. Scully2Ϯ, Chris de Graaf2, Alastair J. H. Brown2 and Janet J. Maguire1 1Experimental Medicine and Immunotherapeutics, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK 2Sosei Heptares, Granta Park, Cambridge, CB21 6DG, UK. Ϯ Contributed equally Correspondence to Anthony P. Davenport email: [email protected] Abstract Dysregulation of peptide-activated pathways causes a range of diseases, fostering the discovery and clinical development of peptide drugs. Many endogenous peptides activate G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) — nearly fifty GPCR peptide drugs have been approved to date, most of them for metabolic disease or oncology, and more than 10 potentially first- in-class peptide therapeutics are in the pipeline. The majority of existing peptide therapeutics are agonists, which reflects the currently dominant strategy of modifying the endogenous peptide sequence of ligands for peptide-binding GPCRs. Increasingly, novel strategies are being employed to develop both agonists and antagonists, and both to introduce chemical novelty and improve drug-like properties. Pharmacodynamic improvements are evolving to bias ligands to activate specific downstream signalling pathways in order to optimise efficacy and reduce side effects. In pharmacokinetics, modifications that increase plasma-half life have been revolutionary. Here, we discuss the current status of peptide drugs targeting GPCRs, with a focus on evolving strategies to improve pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Introduction G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate a wide range of signalling processes and are targeted by one third of drugs in clinical use1. Although most GPCR-targeting therapeutics are small molecules2, the endogenous ligands for many GPCRs are peptides (comprising 50 or fewer amino acids), which suggests that this class of molecule could be therapeutically useful.
    [Show full text]
  • Vasopressin, Norepinephrine, and Vasodilatory Shock After Cardiac Surgery Another “VASST” Difference?
    Vasopressin, Norepinephrine, and Vasodilatory Shock after Cardiac Surgery Another “VASST” Difference? James A. Russell, A.B., M.D. AJJAR et al.1 designed, Strengths of VANCS include H conducted, and now report the blinded randomized treat- in this issue an elegant random- ment, careful follow-up, calcula- ized double-blind controlled trial tion of the composite outcome, of vasopressin (0.01 to 0.06 U/ achieving adequate and planned Downloaded from http://pubs.asahq.org/anesthesiology/article-pdf/126/1/9/374893/20170100_0-00010.pdf by guest on 01 October 2021 min) versus norepinephrine (10 to sample size, and evaluation of 60 μg/min) post cardiac surgery vasopressin pharmacokinetics. with vasodilatory shock (Vaso- Nearly 20 yr ago, Landry et al.2–6 pressin versus Norepinephrine in discovered relative vasopressin defi- Patients with Vasoplegic Shock ciency and benefits of prophylactic After Cardiac Surgery [VANCS] (i.e., pre cardiopulmonary bypass) trial). Open-label norepinephrine and postoperative low-dose vaso- was added if there was an inad- pressin infusion in patients with equate response to blinded study vasodilatory shock after cardiac drug. Vasodilatory shock was surgery. Previous trials of vasopres- defined by hypotension requiring sin versus norepinephrine in cardiac vasopressors and a cardiac index surgery were small and underpow- greater than 2.2 l · min · m-2. The “[The use of] …vasopressin ered for mortality assessment.2–6 primary endpoint was a compos- Vasopressin stimulates arginine ite: “mortality or severe complica- infusion for treatment of vasopressin receptor 1a, arginine tions.” Patents with vasodilatory vasodilatory shock after vasopressin receptor 1b, V2, oxy- shock within 48 h post cardiopul- tocin, and purinergic receptors monary bypass weaning were eli- cardiac surgery may causing vasoconstriction (V1a), gible.
    [Show full text]
  • Annexes to the Annual Report of the European Medicines Agency 2014
    Annexes to the annual report of the European Medicines Agency 2014 Table of contents Annex 1 – Members of the Management Board ............................................................................. 2 Annex 2 – Members of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use ................................... 4 Annex 3 – Members of the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee ...................................... 6 Annex 4 – Members of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use ............................... 8 Annex 5 – Members of the Committee on Orphan Medicinal Products ............................................ 10 Annex 6 – Members of the Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products .............................................. 12 Annex 07 – Committee for Advanced Therapies .......................................................................... 14 Annex 8 – Members of the Paediatric Committee ........................................................................ 16 Annex 9 – Working parties and working groups .......................................................................... 18 Annex 10 – CHMP opinions in 2014 on medicinal products for human use ...................................... 22 Annex 11 – CVMP opinions in 2014 on medicinal products for veterinary use .................................. 36 Annex 12 – COMP opinions in 2014 on designation of orphan medicinal products ............................ 41 Annex 13 – HMPC European Union herbal monographs in 2014....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Patent Application Publication ( 10 ) Pub . No . : US 2019 / 0192440 A1
    US 20190192440A1 (19 ) United States (12 ) Patent Application Publication ( 10) Pub . No. : US 2019 /0192440 A1 LI (43 ) Pub . Date : Jun . 27 , 2019 ( 54 ) ORAL DRUG DOSAGE FORM COMPRISING Publication Classification DRUG IN THE FORM OF NANOPARTICLES (51 ) Int . CI. A61K 9 / 20 (2006 .01 ) ( 71 ) Applicant: Triastek , Inc. , Nanjing ( CN ) A61K 9 /00 ( 2006 . 01) A61K 31/ 192 ( 2006 .01 ) (72 ) Inventor : Xiaoling LI , Dublin , CA (US ) A61K 9 / 24 ( 2006 .01 ) ( 52 ) U . S . CI. ( 21 ) Appl. No. : 16 /289 ,499 CPC . .. .. A61K 9 /2031 (2013 . 01 ) ; A61K 9 /0065 ( 22 ) Filed : Feb . 28 , 2019 (2013 .01 ) ; A61K 9 / 209 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 9 /2027 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 31/ 192 ( 2013. 01 ) ; Related U . S . Application Data A61K 9 /2072 ( 2013 .01 ) (63 ) Continuation of application No. 16 /028 ,305 , filed on Jul. 5 , 2018 , now Pat . No . 10 , 258 ,575 , which is a (57 ) ABSTRACT continuation of application No . 15 / 173 ,596 , filed on The present disclosure provides a stable solid pharmaceuti Jun . 3 , 2016 . cal dosage form for oral administration . The dosage form (60 ) Provisional application No . 62 /313 ,092 , filed on Mar. includes a substrate that forms at least one compartment and 24 , 2016 , provisional application No . 62 / 296 , 087 , a drug content loaded into the compartment. The dosage filed on Feb . 17 , 2016 , provisional application No . form is so designed that the active pharmaceutical ingredient 62 / 170, 645 , filed on Jun . 3 , 2015 . of the drug content is released in a controlled manner. Patent Application Publication Jun . 27 , 2019 Sheet 1 of 20 US 2019 /0192440 A1 FIG .
    [Show full text]