Challenging the Myths of 19th Century Party Dominance: Evidence from Indirect Senate Elections 1871-1913 Wendy Schiller Brown University
[email protected] Charles Stewart III The Massachusetts Institute of Technology
[email protected] Earlier drafts were presented at the University of Georgia Department of Political Science seminar series, February 2, 2007, the History of Congress Conference, Yale University, May 12- 13, 2006, and at the conference on Party Effects in the U.S. Senate, Duke University, April 6-9, 2006. The research in this paper was supported by NSF grant number 0518313. We thank the following research assistants for their unstinting work on this project: Kelly Bay, Jennifer Davis, Keith Edwards, Dristin Falciglia, Amy Goins, Andrew Gordon, Adam Groce, Laura Hajj, Tony Hill, Jeremy Johnson, Allison C. Jones, Jessica Karnis, Clare Kim, Eli Lewien, Kevin McDonald, Ruth Miller, Sandy Naing, Andreea O’Connell, Gabriella Wakeman, and Rafaella Wakeman. 2 Challenging the Myths of 19th Century Party Dominance: Evidence from Indirect Senate Elections 1871-1813 Before the 17th Amendment went into effect in 1914, the election of United States senators by state legislatures was one of the most prominent features of American national politics. The past decade has seen a number of articles examine the consequences of switching from state legislative election to direct election of senators in the 1910s (Stewart 1992a, 1992b; King and Ellis 1996; Hibbing and Brandes Crook 1997; Wirls 1998). This literature has found a few significant direct effects of the 17th Amendment on subsequent national politics: after direct elections were instituted, the partisan composition of the Senate shifted towards the Democratic Party and away from long a period of Republican dominance.