DESIGN NINE Broadband Planners TABLE of CONTENTS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DESIGN NINE Broadband Planners TABLE of CONTENTS BROADBAND FOR FRANKLIN COUNTY Broadband Assessment and Plan August 2019 Wireless Design Implementation Phases # PhAse 1 Towers ! PhAse 1 Poles UV635 # PhAse 2 Towers ! PhAse 2 Poles # PhAse 3 Towers ! PhAse 3 Poles Windy Gap UV678 Wireless Connections Wireless Network CoverAge UV116 ¤£220 UV122 Burnt Chimney Tower Cahas Tower Summit View Tower Blue Ridge Tower UV635 UV122 Dudley Grassy Hill Redwood Substation Tower Rocky Mount Union Hall CATCE Glade Hill Franklin County Substation Callaway High School UV40 Lee M Waid Glade Hill Penhook Elementary Substation Cooks Knob Tower UV40 Pigg Tower Sontag Ferrum Thornton Substation Endicott Tower ¤£220 Toms Knob Tower Henry FD Tower Henry Elementary ² UV108 Snow Creek Tower 08/016/2019 Credits: Esri, FrAnklin County VA 0 7.5 15 Miles Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA DESIGN NINE broadband planners TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Broadband Infrastructure as a Utility ______________________1 1.1 THE SHARED INFRASTRUCTURE BUSINESS MODEL _________________________3 2 What is Government’s Role? _____________________________5 3 Governance and Ownership Options _____________________6 3.1 ABOUT BROADBAND AUTHORITIES ______________________________________6 3.2 ABOUT NONPROFITS ____________________________________________________7 3.3 ABOUT COOPS _________________________________________________________8 3.4 GOVERNANCE QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION ______________________________10 3.5 RECOMMENDATION ____________________________________________________10 5 Existing Assets and Demography ________________________11 5.1 EXISTING BROADBAND COVERAGE AT 25/3 SPEEDS _______________________12 5.2 EXISTING DSL COVERAGE AT 25/3 SPEEDS ________________________________13 5.3 FIXED POINT WIRELESS AT 25/3 SPEEDS __________________________________14 5.4 CELLULAR COVERAGE BY ALL PROVIDERS _________________________________15 5.5 25/3 COVERAGE WITH ADDRESS POINTS _________________________________16 5.6 UNDERSERVED BY CENSUS BLOCK GROUP ________________________________17 5.7 POINTS OF INTEREST ____________________________________________________18 5.8 LMI AREAS OF THE COUNTY _____________________________________________19 5.9 TOWER ASSETS AND SUB-STATIONS ______________________________________20 5.10 FIBER ASSETS __________________________________________________________21 6 Existing Service Areas and Service Options _______________22 6.1 ZIP CODE DATA _________________________________________________________24 6.2 LOCAL PRICING DATA ___________________________________________________26 7 Needs Assessment _____________________________________30 7.1 HOW MUCH BANDWIDTH IS ENOUGH? ___________________________________30 7.2 RESIDENTIAL BANDWIDTH NEEDS ________________________________________31 7.3 ACTIVITIES IN NEIGHBORING COUNTIES __________________________________32 8 Level Of Service _______________________________________33 8.1 CLOSING THE BROADBAND GAP _________________________________________33 8.2 LIMITING FACTORS ______________________________________________________33 8.3 CURRENT AND FUTURE USES AND SERVICES ______________________________34 12 Last Mile Connectivity Solutions ________________________37 12.1 OVERVIEW OF NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES _______________________________37 12.2 WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES _____________________________________________37 12.3 EMERGING WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES __________________________________38 12.4 DARK FIBER AND LIT FIBER ______________________________________________40 12.5 TERRAIN CHALLENGES _________________________________________________41 12.6 CONNECTIVITY SOLUTIONS ____________________________________________42 12.7 SMALL CELL BROADBAND POLES _______________________________________46 12.8 NANO-CELL AND WIFI CALLING SERVICE ________________________________47 13 Recommendations for Implementation __________________48 13.1 FIXED POINT WIRELESS EXPANSION _____________________________________49 13.2 FIBER TO THE HOME EXPANSION _______________________________________54 13.3 ABOUT IMPLEMENTATION STUDIES _____________________________________57 13.4 WIRELESS CONSTRUCTION COST FACTORS ______________________________57 13.5 WIRELESS TOWER COST ESTIMATES _____________________________________60 13.6 TOWER SPACE ONLY COST ESTIMATE ____________________________________61 13.7 POINT TO POINT BACKHAUL NETWORK _________________________________62 13.8 NEW TOWER ONLY COST ESTIMATE _____________________________________63 13.9 SMALL CELL BROADBAND UTILITY POLE ACCESS COSTS __________________64 14 Broadband Education Strategies _______________________66 14.1 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AN EDUCATION CAMPAIGN ___________________66 DISTRIBUTION ______________________________________________________________66 14.2 MARKETING MATERIALS ________________________________________________67 15 Economic Development Strategies _____________________68 15.1JOB AND WORKFORCE CHALLENGES ____________________________________68 15.2 BUSINESS BANDWIDTH NEEDS __________________________________________69 16 Partnerships and Funding Strategies ____________________71 16.1 PARTNERSHIP OPPORTUNITIES __________________________________________71 16.2 FUNDING STRATEGIES _________________________________________________72 17 Organization and Network Operations __________________81 17.1 WISP TOWER LEASE MANAGEMENT _____________________________________81 17.2 OPERATING A DARK FIBER NETWORK ____________________________________83 17.3 OPERATING A LIT FIBER NETWORK ______________________________________85 17.4 NETWORK EXPANSION _________________________________________________86 17.5 TYPICAL CONTRACT SERVICES __________________________________________86 17.6 OTHER MANAGEMENT ROLES __________________________________________87 17.7 ASSET MANAGEMENT __________________________________________________87 17.8 TOWER SITE AND TOWER MANAGEMENT ________________________________88 17.9 LEGAL AND REGULATORY ______________________________________________91 18 Obstacles, Challenges, and Successes __________________92 18.1 OBSTACLES AND CHALLENGES _________________________________________92 18.2 SUCCESSES ___________________________________________________________94 Appendix A: Glossary ___________________________________96 Appendix B: Tower Owner Data __________________________98 Appendix C: Wireless Cost Data _________________________101 Appendix D: Estimated Wireless Coverage _______________104 Disclaimer The telecommunications business is continually evolving. We have made our best effort to apply our experience and knowledge to the business and technical information contained herein. We believe the data we have presented at this point in time to be accurate and to be representative of the current state of the telecommunications industry. Design Nine, Inc. presents this information solely for planning purposes. This document is not intended to be a replacement for formal engineering studies that are normally required to implement a telecommunications infrastructure. No warranty as to the fitness of this information for any particular building, network, or system is expressed or implied. Design Nine, Inc. will not be responsible for the misuse or misapplication of this information. For more information: www.designnine.com 1 BROADBAND INFRASTRUCTURE AS A UTILITY Governments build and manage roads, but don’t own or manage the businesses that use those roads to deliver goods and services. The tremendous versatility of the Internet and the underlying technology bases now allows services that used to require their own, separate (analog) road system (voice telephony and TV services) to be delivered alongside other services like Internet access on a single, integrated digital road system. If we managed overnight package delivery the way we manage telecom, UPS and Fedex would only deliver packages to residences and businesses where each delivery firm had built a private road for their exclusive use. We recognize immediately the limitations of such a business model–few of us would have overnight package delivery to our homes because the small number of packages delivered would not justify the expense of building a private paved road. Before the rise of the automobile, most roads were built largely by the private sector. After cars became important to commerce and economic development, communities began building and maintaining roads because it became an economic development imperative to have a modern transportation system in communities. Before the rise of the Internet, digital networks were built largely by the private sector. As broadband has become critical to commerce and economic development, communities with digital roads are more competitive globally. The time has come to recognize that it is inefficient and wasteful to build full duplicated digital road systems, which only raise the cost of telecom services to all public and private users. Networks that share capacity among a wide variety of public and private users have a lower cost of construction and a lower cost of operation—benefiting all users. Franklin County Broadband Plan Page !1 of !105 A UTILITY COMPARISON SHARED ROADS SHARED AIRPORTS SHARED TELECOM Historically, roads have been Airports are built and Towers, duct and fiber may be built and maintained by the maintained by a community or installed and maintained by the community for the use of all, region as an economic and community and/or a neutral especially private firms that community development asset. owner/operator for the use of want to use them to deliver Both public and private users all, including private firms that goods and services. benefit from the shared use
Recommended publications
  • Shenandoah Telecommunications Company
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): April 19, 2016 Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Virginia 0-9881 54-1162807 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) (Commission File Number) (IRS Employer Identification No.) 500 Shentel Way P.O. Box 459 Edinburg, VA 22824 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (540) 984-4141 Not applicable (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below): ☐ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) ☐ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) ☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2-(b)) ☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Item 5.07 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. (a) On April 19, 2016, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company held its annual shareholder meeting. At the meeting, the directors set forth below were appointed to three year terms, and two proposals, one to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2016, and the second to approve named executive officer compensation, were approved by shareholders voting by proxy or in person.
    [Show full text]
  • 17-135 Hawaiian Telcom Holdco Inc (18502)
    Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc. P.O. Box 2200 Honolulu, HI 96841 March 14, 2017 Dear Stockholder: You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc. to be held on Friday, April 28, 2017, at 8:00 a.m. at our headquarters at 1177 Bishop Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813. The Secretary’s formal notice of the meeting and the Proxy Statement appear on the following pages and describe the matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting. You also will have the opportunity to hear an update on certain aspects of our business that have occurred in the past year. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote your shares as soon as possible so that your vote will be counted. Sincerely, /s/ SCOTT K. BARBER Scott K. Barber President and Chief Executive Officer Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc. P.O. Box 2200 Honolulu, HI 96841 March 14, 2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc. will hold its Annual Meeting of Stockholders on Friday, April 28, 2017, at 8:00 a.m. H.S.T. at our headquarters at 1177 Bishop Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813. The Annual Meeting is being held for the following purposes: 1. To elect nine directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their successors have been duly elected and qualified; 2. To hold a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers; 3. To hold a non-binding advisory vote on how frequently (every one, two or three years) we conduct an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers; 4.
    [Show full text]
  • HNI Entity 310-010 Verizon Wireless 310-012 Verizon
    HNI Entity 310-010 Verizon Wireless 310-012 Verizon Wireless 310-013 Verizon Wireless 310-014 TEST IMSI HNI 310-016 Cricket Communications 310-020 Union Telephone Company 310-030 AT&T Mobility 310-035 ETEX Communications, LP (d/b/a) ETEX Wireless 310-050 Alaska Communications 310-060 Consolidated Telcom 310-070 AT&T Mobility 310-080 AT&T Mobility 310-090 Cricket Communications, LLC 310-100 New Mexico RSA 4 East Limited Partnership 310-110 Pacific Telecom Inc. 310-120 SPRINTCOM, INC. 310-130 Carolina West Wireless 310-140 GTA Wireless LLC 310-150 AT&T Mobility 310-160 T-Mobile USA 310-170 AT&T Mobility 310-180 West Central Wireless 310-190 Alaska Wireless Communications, LLC 310-200 T-Mobile USA 310-210 T-Mobile USA 310-220 T-Mobile USA 310-230 T-Mobile USA 310-240 T-Mobile USA 310-250 T-Mobile USA 310-260 T-Mobile USA 310-270 T-Mobile USA 310-280 AT&T Mobility 310-290 NEP Cellcorp, Inc. 310-300 Blanca Telephone Company 310-310 T-Mobile USA 310-320 Smith Bagley, Inc. dba CellularOne 310-330 Wireless Partners LLC 310-340 Limitless Mobile, LLC 310-350 Verizon Wireless 310-360 Cellular Network Partnership dba Pioneer Cellular 310-370 Docomo Pacific, Inc. 310-380 AT&T Mobility 310-390 TX-11 Acquisition, LLC 310-400 Wave Runner LLC 310-410 AT&T Mobility 310-420 Cincinnati Bell Wireless, LLC 310-430 GCI Communications Corp 310-440 Numerex Corp 310-450 North East Cellular Inc. 310-460 Newcore Wireless 310-470 Sprint 310-480 Wave Runner LLC 310-490 T-Mobile USA 310-500 Public Service Cellular, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • March 10, 2016
    COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the Matter of: AN INQUIRY INTO THE STATE CASE NO. UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND 2016·00059 ORDER On February 1, 2016, the Commission, on its own motion, initiated this administrative proceeding to investigate the current and future funding, distribution, and administration of the Kentucky Universal Service Fund ("KUSF") , which provides supplemental support for authorized telecommunications carriers that also participate in the federal Lifeline program. The Commission stated that the need for the investigation arose from the projected depletion of the KUSF by April 2016, at which time the fund will no longer be able to meet its monthly obligation, absent action to increase funding or reduce spending. The Commission named as parties the Attorney General's office; all Local Exchange Carriers; all commercial mobile radio service providers; and all eligible telecommunications carriers, and established a procedural schedule providing for the filing of testimony by parties, discovery, and an opportunity for a hearing. In initiating this investigation, the Commission's February 1, 2016 Order cited the need to maintain the solvency of the KUSF and proposed to either temporarily raise the KUSF per-line surcharge from $0.08 to $0.14 or to temporarily lower the amount of state support. Any comments addressing either proposal were required to be filed no later than February 22, 2016. The Commission received a total of nine joint and/or individual comments from the parties to the case, as well as three comments from members of the public. Four joint and/or individual comments 1 expressed support for the Commission's proposal to temporarily raise the per-line monthly surcharge from $0.08 to $0.14.
    [Show full text]
  • Shenandoah Telecommunications Company to Acquire NTELOS Holdings Corp
    NASDAQ: SHEN Shenandoah Telecommunications Company to Acquire NTELOS Holdings Corp. and Amend Affiliate Agreement with Sprint Corp. AUGUST 11, 2015 Safe Harbor Statement This presentation includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, regarding, among other things, our business strategy, our prospects and our financial position. These statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “potential,” “projects” or “anticipates” or the negative or other variation of these similar words, or by discussions of strategy or risks and uncertainties. These statements are based on current expectations of future events. Shentel cautions readers that any forward-looking statement is not a guarantee of future performance and that actual results could differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statement. Such forward- looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about the benefits of the proposed merger with nTelos Holdings Corp. and the transactions with Sprint, including future financial and operating results, Shentel’s plans, objectives, expectations and intentions, the expected timing of completion of the transactions, and other statements that are not historical facts. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Proxy Statement
    24MAR201101400543 Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc. P.O. Box 2200 Honolulu, HI 96841 March 14, 2014 Dear Stockholder: You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc. to be held on Tuesday, May 6, 2014 at 8:00 a.m. at our headquarters at 1177 Bishop Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813. The Secretary’s formal notice of the meeting and the Proxy Statement appear on the following pages and describe the matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting. You also will have the opportunity to hear an update on certain aspects of our business that have occurred in the past year. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote your shares as soon as possible so that your vote will be counted. Sincerely, /s/ ERIC K. YEAMAN Eric K. Yeaman President and Chief Executive Officer Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc. P.O. Box 2200 Honolulu, HI 96841 March 14, 2014 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc. will hold its Annual Meeting of Stockholders on Tuesday, May 6, 2014 at 8:00 a.m. at our headquarters at 1177 Bishop Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813. The Annual Meeting is being held for the following purposes: 1. To elect seven directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their successors have been duly elected and qualified; 2. To hold a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers; 3. To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2014; and 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission DA 18-269 Before the Federal
    Federal Communications Commission DA 18-269 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Telecommunications Carriers Eligible for ) WC Docket No. 09-197 Universal Service Support ) ) Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service ) CC Docket No. 96-45 ) Connect America Fund ) WC Docket No. 10-90 ) ORDER Adopted: March 20, 2018 Released: March 20, 2018 By the Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau: 1. In this order, we approve the request of Shenandoah Personal Communications, LLC (Shentel), successor by merger of Virginia PCS Alliance, L.C. and Richmond 20 MHz LLC d/b/a NTELOS (NTELOS), to relinquish NTELOS’ eligible telecommunications carrier (ETC) designation in Virginia.1 2. Section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), authorizes the Federal Communications Commission to designate a carrier as an ETC when a state commission lacks jurisdiction.2 Section 214(e)(4) of the Act provides that the Commission shall permit an ETC to relinquish its designation “in any area served by more than one” ETC so long as “the remaining [ETCs] ensure that all customers served by the relinquishing carrier will continue to be served.”3 Consistent with this statutory requirement, once the requesting ETC makes the requisite showing under section 214(e)(4), a state commission or this Commission grants the request for relinquishment. 3. In 2005, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) designated NTELOS as an ETC in certain areas in Virginia.4 In 2015, NTELOS assigned T-Mobile USA, Inc. its spectrum licenses covering NTELOS’ service territory in the eastern portion of Virginia.5 Although the transaction did not involve 1 See Request for Relinquishment of Eligible Telecommunications Carrier Designation, WC Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Statistical Report
    ANNUAL STATISTICAL REPORT Statistical Data on Public Utilities in West Virginia Source: Annual Reports Submitted To The Public Service Commission Of West Virginia ______________________________ Condition at the Close of Year Ended December 31, 2019 or as Otherwise Noted Compiled by: Kathryn Stalnaker, Executive Secretary Division Annual Reports Section – 11/16/2020 WEST VIRGINIA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION 2019 ANNUAL REPORT STATISTICS FISCAL YEAR 07/01/18 - 06/30/19 CALENDAR YEAR 01/01/19 - 12/31/19 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Number List of Utilities ............................................................................................ 5 – 26 Utilities Summary ............................................................................................ 27 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - Type of Utilities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Telephone Companies ....................................................................... 28 - 30 Electric Companies ............................................................................ 31 - 37 Gas Companies .................................................................................. 38- 40 Water Utilities: Privately Owned ................................................................................... 41 Publicly Owned - Municipals .............................................................. 42 - 46 Publicly Owned - Districts ............................................................ 47 - 50 Associations and Authorities ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Statistical Report
    ANNUAL STATISTICAL REPORT Statistical Data on Public Utilities in West Virginia Source: Annual Reports Submitted To The Public Service Commission Of West Virginia ______________________________ Condition at the Close of Year Ended December 31, 2013 or as Otherwise Noted Compiled by: Kathryn Stalnaker, Executive Secretary Division, Annual Reports Section – 12/02/2014 WEST VIRGINIA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION 2013 ANNUAL REPORT STATISTICS FISCAL YEAR 07/01/12 - 06/30/13 CALENDAR YEAR 01/01/13 - 12/31/13 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Number List of Utilities ............................................................................................ 5 – 26 Annual Report Summary ................................................................................. 27 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - Type of Utilities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Telephone Companies ....................................................................... 28 - 30 Electric Companies ............................................................................ 31 - 37 Gas Companies ................................................................................. 38 - 40 Water Utilities: Privately Owned ................................................................................... 41 Publicly Owned - Municipals ......................................................... 42 - 46 Publicly Owned - Districts ............................................................ 47 - 51 Associations and Authorities ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trinity Resume.Indd
    Business Classification: Small Business, General Contracting, Subcontracting Primary Services Provided: Cellular industry, Project management State Licensed: Trinity Technologies is dedicated to providing quality service on a timely basis. We are willing to obtain a license for any state needed if it is not already listed below. Alabama Arizona Arkansas California Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New York N. Carolina N. Dakota Ohio S. Carolina S. Dakota Tennessee Texas Virginia Washington W. Virginia Wisconsin Primary Work Activities: Electrical, grounding, excavating and concrete. NAICS code - 238210 In-House Services: Electric Civil Project management Data Site audit Tower foundations Equipment foundations DC power Landscaping Tower inventory Equipment installation & test Power installation & test Electrical design & engineering Safety: EMR: .87 Safety performance incident rate: a. OSHA Recordable Incident Rate . .2005 - 0 . .2006 - 0 b. Lost workday case rate . .2005 - 0 . .2006 - 0 c. Hours worked . .2005 - 27151 . .2006 - est. 40,000 Trinity Technologies offers weekly Tailgate Safety meetings. A copy of our safety program is available upon request. Trinity Technologies conducts project safety inspections and audits to ensure compliance with company safety requirements. Our employees and project managers are directed to place safety first. Without a healthy workforce we are
    [Show full text]
  • Addresses for Text Notices
    ADDRESSES FOR TEXT NOTICES List of Text Message Gateways Carrier Gateway 3 River Wireless [email protected] Advantage Communcations [email protected] AirFire Mobile [email protected] AirVoice [email protected] Aio Wireless [email protected] Alaska Communications [email protected] Alltel (Allied Wireless) [email protected] Ameritech [email protected] Assurance Wireless [email protected] AT&T Mobility [email protected] AT&T Enterprise Paging [email protected] BellSouth [email protected] BellSouth (Blackberry) [email protected] BellSouth Mobility [email protected] Bluegrass Cellular [email protected] Bluesky Communications [email protected] Boost mobile [email protected] Call Plus [email protected] Carolina Mobile Communications [email protected] CellCom [email protected] Cellular One [email protected] Cellular One East Coast [email protected] Cellular One PCS [email protected] Cellular One South West [email protected] Cellular One West [email protected] Cellular South [email protected] Centennial Wireless [email protected] Central Vermont Communications [email protected] CenturyTel [email protected] Chariton Valley Wireless [email protected] Chat Mobility [email protected] Charter *see ‘Spectrum Mobile’ ADDRESSES FOR TEXT NOTICES Cincinnati Bell [email protected] Cingular Wireless [email protected] Cingular (GSM) [email protected] Cingular (TDMA) [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Savvian Wireless Newsletter Q108 Final
    WIRELESS DATA SERVICES SECTOR REPORT GCA SAVVIAN, LLC 150 CALIFORNIA STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 | www.gcasavvian.com |415.318.3600 MARKETMARKET HIGHLIGHTSHIGHLIGHTS Inside this issue The 1 st quarter of 2008 saw a number of important events in the mobile data sector, including results of the 700 MHz spectrum auction, company announcements around the CES, Mobile World Congress and CTIA tradeshows, Market Highlights Microsoft’s acquisition of Danger rumored at $500MM and $100MM private capital raises from Modu and SpinVox. Summary Performance In general, GCA Savvian’s wireless indices reflected the broader markets’ struggles in Q1: our wireless carrier index was off 31% while our mobile content and integrated wireless / wireline indices were in line with the Nasdaq, Observations down 13% and 10%, respectively; our infrastructure universe (up 3%) was the only index in positive territory. Trading Data The domino effect following Verizon’s announcement of a $99 per month unlimited calling plan contributed to stock Transaction Activity price declines for service providers as investors fear carriers have started down a slippery slope with respect to their longer-term pricing strategy and risk becoming simply raw bandwidth providers. GCA Savvian Update In Q1, we tracked 21 M&A transactions within our wireless universe representing $335MM in disclosed value and 59 private companies that raised $480MM in venture capital. SUMMARY PERFORMANCE AV / Revenue AV / EBITDA Price / EPS CY 08E CY 09E CY 08E CY 09E CY 08E CY 09E San Francisco Office
    [Show full text]