DOCSLIB.ORG

Roads Sub-Sector Annual Budget Monitoring Report FY2019/20

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Roads Sub-Sector Annual Budget Monitoring Report FY2019/20 ROADS SUB-SECTOR ANNUAL BUDGET MONITORING REPORT FINANCIAL YEAR 2019/20 NOVEMBER 2020 Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development P.O. Box 8147, Kampala www.finance.go.ug ROADS SUB-SECTOR ANNUAL BUDGET MONITORING REPORT FINANCIAL YEAR 2019/20 NOVEMBER 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ..................................................................................................................................ii FOREWORD.................................................................................................................................iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................iv CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................1 1.1.1 Sub-sector Objectives and Priorities .......................................................................................1 1.1.2 Sector Financial Performance .................................................................................................2 1.2 Rationale/purpose ....................................................................................................................3 1.3 Report outline ...........................................................................................................................3 CHAPTER 2: METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................4 2.1 Scope ....................................................................................................................................4 2.2 Methods ....................................................................................................................................5 2.3 Criteria of selection ...................................................................................................................5 2.4 Limitations ................................................................................................................................5 CHAPTER 3: SECTOR PERFORMANCE ................................................................................6 3.1 Overall Performance ................................................................................................................6 3.1.2 Sector Financial Performance .................................................................................................6 3.1.2 Sector Physical Performance ..................................................................................................6 3.2 Programme Performance ........................................................................................................6 3.2.1 Ministry of Works and Transport– Vote 016 ...........................................................................6 3.2.1 Rehabilitation of District Roads .............................................................................................7 3.2.2 Rural Bridges Infrastructure Development ..........................................................................17 3.3 Uganda National Roads Authority (UNRA) – Vote 113 .......................................................24 3.4 Uganda Road Fund – Vote 118 .............................................................................................41 3.3.1 District, Urban and Community Access Roads (DUCAR) Programme ...............................43 3.3.2 National Roads Maintenance (NRM) Programme ...............................................................67 CHAPTER 4: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..............................................81 4.1 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................81 4.2 Key Sector Challenges ...........................................................................................................82 4.3 Recommendations ..................................................................................................................83 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................84 Roads Sub-Sector: Annual Budget Monitoring Report - FY 2019/20 i ACRONYMS AfDB - African Development Bank CARs - Community Access Roads DBST - Double Bituminous Surface Treatment DDEG - Discretionary Development Equalisation Grant DLP - Defects Liability Period DRRU - Districts Roads Rehabilitation Unit DUCAR - District, Urban and Community Access Roads FY - Financial Year GoU - Government of Uganda IPC - Interim Payment Certificate IPF - Indicative Planning Figure KCCA - Kampala Capital City Authority Km - Kilometre LGMSDP - Local Government Managerial and Service Delivery Programme MC - Municipal Council MFPED - Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development MoLG - Ministry of Local Government MoWT - Ministry of Works and Transport NCR - Northern Corridor Route NRC/R - National Road Construction/Rehabilitation Programme NRM - National Roads Maintenance OHS - Occupational Health and Safety OPM - Office of the Prime Minister PAPs - Project Affected Persons PPDA - Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Authority PRDP - Peace Recovery and Development Programme PRELNOR - Project for Restoration of Livelihoods in Northern Region Q - Quarter ROW - Right of Way TC - Town Council TSDP - Transport Sector Development Project Ug shs - Uganda Shillings UNRA - Uganda National Roads Authority URA - Uganda Revenue Authority URC - Uganda Railways Cooperation URF - Uganda Road Fund US$ - United States Dollars USD - United States Dollars USMID - Uganda Support to Municipal Infrastructure Development ii Roads Sub-Sector: Annual Budget Monitoring Report - FY 2019/20 FOREWORD The Financial Year 2019/20 strategy focused on stimulating import substitution and export promotion, and incentivising private sector development. The government prioritised agriculture and agro-industrialisation, manufacturing, and mineral development to ensure inclusive growth and the creation of jobs, while promoting development of other key primary growth sectors. The economy grew despite the challenges experienced during the year. The wellbeing of Ugandans, and infrastructure necessary for development also improved considerably. The above achievements notwithstanding, majority of the second National Development Plan (NDPII) outcome indicators were not achieved. This report by the Budget Monitoring and Accountability Unit (BMAU) shows that majority of the sectors monitored posted a fair performance, despite receiving a substantial amount of their budgets. I encourage all government institutions, the private sector, development partners, and other key players in the development of this country, to harness the strengths coming with Programme Based Budgeting (PBB), and take cognizant of the lessons learnt during the NDPII to improve service delivery during this NDPIII period. Keith Muhakanizi Permanent Secretary/Secretary to the Treasury Roads Sub-Sector: Annual Budget Monitoring Report - FY 2019/20 iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction This report reviews selected key programmes and sub-programmes within Roads sub-sector, based on approved plans and significance of budget allocations to the Votes. Attention is on large expenditure programmes including both development expenditure and recurrent costs. Focus was also placed on sector gender and equity commitments, and outcomes. Programmes selected for monitoring were based on planned annual outputs; regional representation; level of capital investment; and value of releases during half year, Financial Year 2019/20. The methodology adopted for monitoring included literature review of annual progress and performance reports; interviews with the respective responsible officers or representatives; and observations or physical verification of reported outputs. Physical performance was rated using weighted achievement of the set output targets by 30th June, 2020. Financial Performance The overall Works and Transport Sector budget (five votes) for the FY2019/20 increased by 34% from Ug shs 4,793.829 billion in FY 2018/19, to Ug shs 6,425.028 billion. Only 68.9% of the budget was released, while 87% of the release was absorbed by 30th June 2020 under the four votes namely: Vote 016-Ministry of Works and Transport (MoWT), Vote 113-Uganda National Roads Authority (UNRA), Vote 118-Uganda Road Fund (URF), and Vote 122-Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA). The budget performance was mainly attributed to the poor release from the sector’s external financers. Failure to absorb funds was attributed to: delays in approving the loan for financing the Critical Oil Roads, and slow progress arising out of the poor safeguards management and delays in completing the designs by the contractor on the North Eastern corridor Road Asset Management project (NERAMP) under Vote 118-UNRA; and the lengthy procurement process for boats for the Multinational Lake Victoria Maritime Communication Project, Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) implementation challenges under Development of the new Kampala Port in Bukasa, and the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (CVOID-19) pandemic lockdown that affected progress of the Development of Kabaale Airport, all under MoWT. Highlights of Sector Performance The performance of the roads sub-sector was good at 78.6%. The MoWT performance was fair at
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kyankwanzi Survey Report 2017
    GROUND SURVEY FOR MEDIUM - LARGE MAMMALS IN KYANKWANZI CONCESSION AREA Report by F. E. Kisame, F. Wanyama, G. Basuta, I. Bwire and A. Rwetsiba, ECOLOGICAL MONITORING AND RESEARCH UNIT UGANDA WILDLIFE AUTHORITY 2018 1 | P a g e Contents Summary.........................................................................................................................4 1.0. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................5 1.1. Survey Objectives.....................................................................................................6 2.0. DESCRIPTION OF THE SURVEY AREA ..........................................................6 2.2. Location and Size .....................................................................................................7 2.2. Climate.....................................................................................................................7 2.3 Relief and Vegetation ................................................................................................8 3.0. METHOD AND MATERIALS..............................................................................9 Plate 1. Team leader and GPS person recording observations in the field.........................9 3.1. Survey design .........................................................................................................10 4.0. RESULTS .............................................................................................................10 4.1. Fauna......................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • DISTRICT BASELINE: Nakasongola, Nakaseke and Nebbi in Uganda
    EASE – CA PROJECT PARTNERS EAST AFRICAN CIVIL SOCIETY FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY & CLIMATE ACTION (EASE – CA) PROJECT DISTRICT BASELINE: Nakasongola, Nakaseke and Nebbi in Uganda SEPTEMBER 2019 Prepared by: Joint Energy and Environment Projects (JEEP) P. O. Box 4264 Kampala, (Uganda). Supported by Tel: +256 414 578316 / 0772468662 Email: [email protected] JEEP EASE CA PROJECT 1 Website: www.jeepfolkecenter.org East African Civil Society for Sustainable Energy and Climate Action (EASE-CA) Project ALEF Table of Contents ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................................................... 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .................................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 6 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 8 1.1 Background of JEEP ............................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Energy situation in Uganda .................................................................................................. 8 1.3 Objectives of the baseline study ......................................................................................... 11 1.4 Report Structure ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Contract Farming, Smallholders and Commercialization of Agriculture in Uganda: the Case of Sorghum, Sunflower, and Rice Contract Farming Schemes
    Center of Evaluation for Global Action Working Paper Series Agriculture for Development Paper No. AfD-0907 Issued in July 2009 Contract Farming, Smallholders and Commercialization of Agriculture in Uganda: The Case of Sorghum, Sunflower, and Rice Contract Farming Schemes. Gabriel Elepu Imelda Nalukenge Makerere University This paper is posted at the eScholarship Repository, University of California. http://repositories.cdlib.org/cega/afd Copyright © 2009 by the author(s). Series Description: The CEGA AfD Working Paper series contains papers presented at the May 2009 Conference on “Agriculture for Development in Sub-Saharan Africa,” sponsored jointly by the African Economic Research Consortium (AERC) and CEGA. Recommended Citation: Elepu, Gabriel and Nalukenge, Imelda. (2009) Contract Farming, Smallholders and Commercialization of Agriculture in Uganda: The Case of Sorghum, Sunflower, and Rice Contract Farming Schemes. CEGA Working Paper Series No. AfD-0907. Center of Evaluation for Global Action. University of California, Berkeley. Contract Farming, Smallholders and Commercialization of Agriculture in Uganda: The Case of Sorghum, Sunflower, and Rice Contract Farming Schemes. Gabriel Elepu1∗ and Imelda Nalukenge2 1Lecturer in the Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Makerere University, Kampala. 2Lecturer (Deceased) in the Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Makerere University, Kampala. ABSTRACT: Contract farming has expanded in Uganda due to the promotional efforts of various actors: private, public, and/or international aid agencies. While motives for promoting contract farming may vary by actor, it is argued in this study that contract farming is crucial in the commercialization of smallholder agriculture and hence, poverty reduction in Uganda. However, smallholder farmers in Uganda have reportedly experienced some contractual problems when dealing with large agribusiness firms, resulting in them giving up contract farming.
    [Show full text]
  • Ending CHILD MARRIAGE and TEENAGE PREGNANCY in Uganda
    ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA A FORMATIVE RESEARCH TO GUIDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY ON ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA Final Report - December 2015 ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA 1 A FORMATIVE RESEARCH TO GUIDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY ON ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA A FORMATIVE RESEARCH TO GUIDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY ON ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA Final Report - December 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF) gratefully acknowledges the valuable contribution of many individuals whose time, expertise and ideas made this research a success. Gratitude is extended to the Research Team Lead by Dr. Florence Kyoheirwe Muhanguzi with support from Prof. Grace Bantebya Kyomuhendo and all the Research Assistants for the 10 districts for their valuable support to the research process. Lastly, UNICEF would like to acknowledge the invaluable input of all the study respondents; women, men, girls and boys and the Key Informants at national and sub national level who provided insightful information without whom the study would not have been accomplished. I ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA A FORMATIVE RESEARCH TO GUIDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY ON ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................I
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda 2015 Human Rights Report
    UGANDA 2015 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Uganda is a constitutional republic led since 1986 by President Yoweri Museveni of the ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM) party. Voters re-elected Museveni to a fourth five-year term and returned an NRM majority to the unicameral Parliament in 2011. While the election marked an improvement over previous elections, it was marred by irregularities. Civilian authorities generally maintained effective control over the security forces. The three most serious human rights problems in the country included: lack of respect for the integrity of the person (unlawful killings, torture, and other abuse of suspects and detainees); restrictions on civil liberties (freedoms of assembly, expression, the media, and association); and violence and discrimination against marginalized groups, such as women (sexual and gender-based violence), children (sexual abuse and ritual killing), persons with disabilities, and the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) community. Other human rights problems included harsh prison conditions, arbitrary and politically motivated arrest and detention, lengthy pretrial detention, restrictions on the right to a fair trial, official corruption, societal or mob violence, trafficking in persons, and child labor. Although the government occasionally took steps to punish officials who committed abuses, whether in the security services or elsewhere, impunity was a problem. Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from: a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life There were several reports the government or its agents committed arbitrary or unlawful killings. On September 8, media reported security forces in Apaa Parish in the north shot and killed five persons during a land dispute over the government’s border demarcation.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Schools in Biology (UACE 2019)
    UACE RESULTS NEW VISION, Monday, March 2, 2020 57 Best Schools in Literature (UACE 2019) NO OF T/TAL AV NO OF T/TAL NO OF T/TAL NO OF T/TAL T/TAL NO SCHOOL SCORE StD’S STD’S AV AV AV AV NO OF NO SCHOOL SCORE StD’S STD’S NO SCHOOL SCORE StD’S STD’S NO SCHOOL SCORE StD’S STD’S NO SCHOOL SCORE StD’S STD’S 1 St.Henry's Col.,Kitovu 5.54 13 108 41 Kitagata HS 4.25 12 39 81 St. Kalemba,Villa Maria 4.00 2 31 121 Kennedy SS,Kisubi 3.86 7 97 161 St. Peter's SS, Naalya 3.62 52 325 2 King's Col.,Budo 5.52 23 200 42 Kangole Girls' School 4.25 4 24 82 The Ac. St.Lawrence Budo 4.00 3 28 122 Nyabubare SS 3.86 14 92 162 Katikamu SS 3.60 10 144 3 Mengo SS 5.33 3 492 43 Kisubi Seminary 4.22 9 35 83 Sir Apollo Kaggwa, Mukono 4.00 1 28 123 Jeressar HS,Soroti 3.83 30 227 163 Kawanda SS 3.60 5 131 4 St. Joseph’s SS,Naggalama 5.18 11 87 44 Our Lady Of Africa,Mukono 4.22 23 247 84 Kitabi Seminary 4.00 2 28 124 Bp. Cyprian Kyabakadde 3.83 6 104 164 St.Lucia Hill, Namagoma 3.60 5 107 5 Mt.St. Mary’s,Namagunga 5.15 20 114 45 Sac’d Heart SS,Mushanga 4.21 14 57 85 City SS, Kayunga Wakiso 4.00 2 28 125 P.M.M Girls' School,Jinja 3.83 12 58 165 Wanyange Girls School 3.60 25 56 6 Maryhill HS 5.10 20 124 46 Kalinabiri SS 4.20 5 74 86 Bushenyi Progressive HS 4.00 6 28 126 Sheema Girls' School 3.83 6 45 166 Bp.
    [Show full text]
  • Contact List for District Health O Cers & District Surveillance Focal Persons
    THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA MINISTRY OF HEALTH Contact List for District Health Ocers & District Surveillance Focal Persons THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA MINISTRY OF HEALTH FIRST NAME LAST NAME E-MAIL ADDRESS DISTRICT TITLE MOBILEPHONE Adunia Anne [email protected] ADJUMANI DHO 772992437 Olony Paul [email protected] ADJUMANI DSFP 772878005 Emmanuel Otto [email protected] AGAGO DHO 772380481 Odongkara Christopher [email protected] AGAGO DSFP 782556650 Okello Quinto [email protected] AMOLATAR DHO 772586080 Mundo Okello [email protected] AMOLATAR DSFP 772934056 Sagaki Pasacle [email protected] AMUDAT DHO 772316596 Elimu Simon [email protected] AMUDAT DSFP 752728751 Wala Maggie [email protected] AMURIA DHO 784905657 Olupota Ocom [email protected] AMURIA DSFP 771457875 Odong Patrick [email protected] AMURU DHO 772840732 Okello Milton [email protected] AMURU DSFP 772969499 Emer Mathew [email protected] APAC DHO 772406695 Oceng Francis [email protected] APAC DSFP 772356034 Anguyu Patrick [email protected] ARUA DHO 772696200 Aguakua Anthony [email protected] ARUA DSFP 772198864 Immelda Tumuhairwe [email protected] BUDUDA DHO 772539170 Zelesi Wakubona [email protected] BUDUDA DSFP 782573807 Kiirya Stephen [email protected] BUGIRI DHO 772432918 Magoola Peter [email protected] BUGIRI DSFP 772574808 Peter Muwereza [email protected] BUGWERI DHO 782553147 Umar Mabodhe [email protected] BUGWERI DSFP 775581243 Turyasingura Wycliffe [email protected] BUHWEJU DHO 773098296 Bemera Amon [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Land Reform and Sustainable Livelihoods
    ! M4 -vJ / / / o rtr £,/- -n AO ^ l> /4- e^^/of^'i e i & ' cy6; s 6 cy6; S 6 s- ' c fwsrnun Of WVELOPMENT STUDIES LIBRARY Acknowledgements The researchers would like to thank Ireland Aid and APSO for funding the research; the Ministers for Agriculture and Lands, Dr. Kisamba Mugerwa and Hon. Baguma Isoke for their support and contribution; and the Irish Embassy in Kampala for its support. Many thanks also to all who provided valuable insights into the research topic through interviews, focus group discussions and questionnaire surveys in Kampala and Kibaale District. Finally: a special word of thanks to supervisors and research fellows in MISR, particularly Mr Patrick Mulindwa who co-ordinated most of the field-based activities, and to Mr. Nick Chisholm in UCC for advice and direction particularly at design and analysis stages. BLDS (British Library for Development Studies) Institute of Development Studies Brighton BN1 9RE Tel: (01273) 915659 Email: [email protected] Website: www.blds.ids.ac.uk Please return by: Executive Summary Chapter One - Background and Introduction This report is one of the direct outputs of policy orientated research on land tenure / land reform conducted in specific areas of Uganda and South Africa. The main goal of the research is to document information and analysis on key issues relating to the land reform programme in Uganda. It is intended that that the following pages will provide those involved with the land reform process in Kibaale with information on: • how the land reform process is being carried out at a local level • who the various resource users are, how they are involved in the land reform, and how each is likely to benefit / loose • empirical evidence on gainers and losers (if any) from reform in other countries • the gender implications of tenure reform • how conflicts over resource rights are dealt with • essential supports to the reform process (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • UGANDA Report on Workshop Held September 11-13, 2017
    Integrating Gender and Nutrition within Agricultural Extension Services UGANDA Report on Workshop held September 11-13, 2017 Report prepared by Siya Aggrey, Amber E. Martin, Fatmata Binta Jalloh and Dr. Kathleen E. Colverson © INGENAES. Workshop Participants, Nile Hotel, Jinja, Uganda This report was produced as part of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and US Government Feed the Future project “Integrating Gender and Nutrition within Extension and Advisory Services” (INGENAES). Leader with Associates Cooperative Agreement No. AID-OAA-LA-14-00008. www.ingenaes.illinois.edu The report was made possible by the generous support of the American people through USAID. The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States government. Introduction Integrating Gender within Agricultural Extension and Advisory Services (INGENAES) is funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign is the prime awardee, and partners with the University of California, Davis, the University of Florida, and Cultural Practice, LLC. INGENAES is designed to assist partners in Feed the Future countries (www.feedthefuture.gov) to: • Build more robust, gender-responsive, and nutrition-sensitive institutions, projects and programs capable of assessing and responding to the needs of both men and women farmers through extension and advisory services. • Disseminate gender-appropriate and nutrition-enhancing technologies and access to inputs to improve women’s agricultural productivity and enhance household nutrition. • Identify, test efficacy, and scale proven mechanisms for delivering improved extension to women farmers. • Apply effective, nutrition-sensitive, extension approaches and tools for engaging both men and women.
    [Show full text]
  • KAGADI DLG Q3 REPORT.Pdf
    Local Government Quarterly Performance Report Vote: 613 Kagadi District 2016/17 Quarter 3 Structure of Quarterly Performance Report Summary Quarterly Department Workplan Performance Cumulative Department Workplan Performance Location of Transfers to Lower Local Services and Capital Investments Submission checklist I hereby submit _________________________________________________________________________. This is in accordance with Paragraph 8 of the letter appointing me as an Accounting Officer for Vote:613 Kagadi District for FY 2016/17. I confirm that the information provided in this report represents the actual performance achieved by the Local Government for the period under review. Name and Signature: Chief Administrative Officer, Kagadi District Date: 5/16/2017 cc. The LCV Chairperson (District)/ The Mayor (Municipality) Page 1 Local Government Quarterly Performance Report Vote: 613 Kagadi District 2016/17 Quarter 3 Summary: Overview of Revenues and Expenditures Overall Revenue Performance Cumulative Receipts Performance Approved Budget Cumulative % UShs 000's Receipts Budget Received 1. Locally Raised Revenues 765,635 465,783 61% 2a. Discretionary Government Transfers 2,741,376 2,223,027 81% 2b. Conditional Government Transfers 14,216,612 13,242,416 93% 2c. Other Government Transfers 41,901 4. Donor Funding 608,000 0 0% Total Revenues 18,331,622 15,973,128 87% Overall Expenditure Performance Cumulative Releases and Expenditure Perfromance Approved Budget Cumulative Cumulative % % % UShs 000's Releases Expenditure Budget Budget Releases
    [Show full text]
  • AFRICA - Uganda and East DRC - Basemap ) !( E Nzara Il ILEMI TRIANGLE N N
    !( !( !( )"" !( ! Omo AFRICA - Uganda and East DRC - Basemap ) !( e Nzara il ILEMI TRIANGLE N n Banzali Asa Yambio i ! ! !( a t n u ETHIOPIA o !( !( SNNP M Camp 15 WESTERN ( l !( EQUATORIA e !( b e Torit Keyala Lobira Digba J !( !( Nadapal ! l !( ± e r Lainya h a ! !Yakuluku !( Diagbe B Malingindu Bangoie ! !( ! Duru EASTERN ! Chukudum Lokitaung EQUATORIA !( Napopo Ukwa Lokichokio ! ! !( Banda ! Kpelememe SOUTH SUDAN ! Bili Bangadi ! ! Magwi Yei !( Tikadzi ! CENTRAL Ikotos EQUATORIA !( Ango !( Bwendi !( Moli Dakwa ! ! ! Nambili Epi ! ! ! Kumbo Longo !( !Mangombo !Ngilima ! Kajo Keji Magombo !( Kurukwata ! Manzi ! ! Aba Lake Roa !( ! Wando Turkana Uda ! ! Bendele Manziga ! ! ! Djabir Kakuma Apoka !( !( Uele !( MARSABIT Faradje Niangara Gangara Morobo Kapedo !( ! !( !( Dikumba Dramba ! Dingila Bambili Guma ! Moyo !( !( ! Ali !( Dungu ! Wando ! Mokombo Gata Okondo ! ! ! !( Nimule !( Madi-Opel Bandia Amadi !( ! ! Makilimbo Denge Karenga ! ! Laropi !( !( !( LEGEND Mbuma Malengoya Ndoa !( Kalokol ! ! Angodia Mangada ! Duku ile Nimule Kaabong !( ! ! ! ! Kaya N Dembia ert !( Po Kumuka Alb Padibe ! Gubeli ! Tadu Yumbe !( Bambesa ! Wauwa Bumva !( !( Locations Bima !( ! Tapili ! Monietu ! !( ! Dili Lodonga " ! Koboko " Capital city Dingba Bibi Adi !( !( Orom ) ! Midi-midi ! ! !( Bima Ganga Likandi Digili ! Adjumani ! ! ! ! Gabu Todro Namokora Loyoro TURKANA Major city ! Tora Nzoro ! !( !( ! ! !( Lagbo Oleba Kitgum Other city Mabangana Tibo Wamba-moke Okodongwe ! Oria !( !( ! ! ! ! ! Omugo Kitgum-Matidi Kana Omiya Anyima !( ! !( Atiak Agameto Makongo
    [Show full text]
  • Vote:113 Uganda National Roads Authority
    Vote:113 Uganda National Roads Authority Table V1: Summary Of Vote Estimates by Programme and Sub-SubProgramme Thousand Uganda Shillings 2021/22 Draft Estimates Programme 08 Integrated Transport Infrastructure and Services GoU External Fin Total 51 National Roads Maintenance & Construction 1,846,105,652 973,331,768 2,819,437,420 Total For Programme 08 1,846,105,652 973,331,768 2,819,437,420 Total Excluding Arrears 1,831,085,301 973,331,768 2,804,417,069 Total Vote 113 1,846,105,652 973,331,768 2,819,437,420 Total Excluding Arrears 1,831,085,301 973,331,768 2,804,417,069 Vote 113Uganda National Roads Authority - Works and Transport Vote:113 Uganda National Roads Authority Table V2: Summary Of Vote Estimates by Sub-SubProgramme,Department and Project Thousand Uganda Shillings 2020/21 Approved Budget 2021/22 Draft Estimates Sub-SubProgramme 51 National Roads Maintenance & Construction Recurrent Budget Estimates Wage Non-Wage AIA Total Wage Non-Wage Total 01 Finance and Administration 71,105,193 32,150,150 0 103,255,343 71,105,193 24,928,248 96,033,441 06 Project Preparation Studies 0 0 0 0 0 35,825,000 35,825,000 Total Recurrent Budget Estimates for Sub- 71,105,193 32,150,150 0 103,255,343 71,105,193 60,753,248 131,858,441 SubProgramme Development Budget Estimates GoU Dev't External Fin AIA Total GoU Dev't External Fin Total 0265 Upgrade Atiak - Moyo-Afoji (104km) 4,334,763 23,972,460 0 28,307,223 19,133,720 38,828,280 57,962,000 0267 Improvement of Ferry Services 48,284,110 0 0 48,284,110 29,449,000 0 29,449,000 0952 Design Masaka-Bukakata
    [Show full text]