DOCSLIB.ORG

Prince William Sound Anadromous Stream List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prince William Sound Anadromous Stream List Revised – June 2020 Prince William Sound Anadromous Stream List This list of streams provides the most recent lat/long data for identification of known salmon streams in PWS. Unless otherwise specified in regulation, commercial fishing for salmon is prohibited as stated in 5 AAC 24.350 and 5 AAC 39.290. Closed areas defined by existing markers and regulation remain in effect. Lat/Long data source: Anadromous Waters Catalog (AWC). (*common stream name not on USGS maps) Highlighted streams denote changes from previous versions. AWC Latitude Longitude Latitude Longitude District Stream Stream Number (decimal) (decimal) (degree decimal minutes) (degree decimal minutes) Eastern (221) 221-10-10010 60.49082581 -145.89904700 60° 29.45' -145° 53.94' Eastern (221) 221-10-10017 60.49138045 -145.88576134 60° 29.48' -145° 53.15' Eastern (221) 221-10-10020 Hartney Creek 60.50200000 -145.86300000 60° 30.12' -145° 51.78' Eastern (221) 221-10-10030 Nicolet Creek 60.51876262 -145.79165821 60° 31.13' -145° 47.50' Eastern (221) 221-10-10040 Heney Creek 60.52406314 -145.79297708 60° 31.44' -145° 47.58' Eastern (221) 221-10-10050 Eccles Creek 60.53256077 -145.78607242 60° 31.95' -145° 47.16' Eastern (221) 221-10-10060 *Odiak Slough 60.53779382 -145.75892974 60° 32.27' -145° 45.54' Eastern (221) 221-10-10062 60.53900000 -145.74940000 60° 32.34' -145° 44.96' Eastern (221) 221-10-10070 *Ocean Dock Creek 60.55640682 -145.75197627 60° 33.38' -145° 45.12' Eastern (221) 221-10-10080 Fleming Creek 60.56346596 -145.74146520 60° 33.81' -145° 44.49' Eastern (221) 221-10-10100 Little Humpback Creek 60.60845841 -145.68727087 60° 36.51' -145° 41.24' Eastern (221) 221-10-10110 Humpback Creek 60.61320720 -145.67957028 60° 36.79' -145° 40.77' Eastern (221) 221-10-10130 60.64099656 -145.64438523 60° 38.46' -145° 38.66' Eastern (221) 221-10-10140 60.65059021 -145.62357966 60° 39.04' -145° 37.41' Eastern (221) 221-10-10150 *Nelson Creek 60.65823406 -145.60723819 60° 39.49' -145° 36.43' Eastern (221) 221-10-10155 Snyder Falls Creek 60.66186882 -145.61585079 60° 39.71' -145° 36.95' Eastern (221) 221-10-10160 Rude River 60.66899768 -145.61990976 60° 40.14' -145° 37.19' Eastern (221) 221-10-10165 60.67101922 -145.63096491 60° 40.26' -145° 37.86' Eastern (221) 221-10-10170 Robinson Falls Creek 60.67011375 -145.64206463 60° 40.21' -145° 38.52' Eastern (221) 221-10-10173 60.66480403 -145.65767307 60° 39.89' -145° 39.46' Eastern (221) 221-10-10174 60.66230878 -145.66207768 60° 39.74' -145° 39.72' Eastern (221) 221-10-10175 60.64902937 -145.69789428 60° 38.94' -145° 41.87' Eastern (221) 221-10-10176 60.64269944 -145.71645184 60° 38.56' -145° 42.99' Eastern (221) 221-20-10170 60.62762859 -145.84690972 60° 37.66' -145° 50.81' 1 Revised – June 2020 Eastern (221) 221-20-10180 60.61638218 -145.87495493 60° 36.98' -145° 52.50' Eastern (221) 221-20-10190 *Twin Lakes Creek 60.63631987 -145.81094359 60° 38.18' -145° 48.66' Eastern (221) 221-20-10200 *Spring Creek 60.64393854 -145.80871460 60° 38.64' -145° 48.52' Eastern (221) 221-20-10210 Rogue Creek 60.64539333 -145.81089025 60° 38.72' -145° 48.65' Eastern (221) 221-20-10220 60.65712741 -145.80426077 60° 39.43' -145° 48.26' Eastern (221) 221-20-10230 Raging Creek 60.65807321 -145.81315667 60° 39.48' -145° 48.79' Eastern (221) 221-20-10240 60.64955213 -145.87420368 60° 38.97' -145° 52.45' Eastern (221) 221-20-10250 60.67580556 -145.85364300 60° 40.55' -145° 51.22' Eastern (221) 221-20-10255 Simpson Creek 60.68740595 -145.83844922 60° 41.24' -145° 50.31' Eastern (221) 221-20-10260 Simpson Creek 60.69050056 -145.83883640 60° 41.43' -145° 50.33' Eastern (221) 221-20-10263 60.68805562 -145.86048077 60° 41.28' -145° 51.63' Eastern (221) 221-20-10270 *Smith Creek 60.63167509 -145.94091951 60° 37.90' -145° 56.46' Eastern (221) 221-20-10280 *Durkee Creek 60.62474178 -145.97457692 60° 37.48' -145° 58.47' Eastern (221) 221-20-10290 60.63890260 -145.99717476 60° 38.33' -145° 59.83' Eastern (221) 221-20-10300 60.65573018 -145.98319256 60° 39.34' -145° 58.99' Eastern (221) 221-20-10310 60.66204323 -145.96248129 60° 39.72' -145° 57.75' Eastern (221) 221-20-10314 60.66728001 -145.96052072 60° 40.04' -145° 57.63' Eastern (221) 221-20-10318 60.67177396 -145.95339098 60° 40.31' -145° 57.20' Eastern (221) 221-20-10320 60.67263120 -145.95184286 60° 40.36' -145° 57.11' Eastern (221) 221-20-10328 60.68342540 -145.93470797 60° 41.01' -145° 56.08' Eastern (221) 221-20-10330 60.68471416 -145.93231315 60° 41.08' -145° 55.94' Eastern (221) 221-20-10339 60.69492967 -145.91304270 60° 41.70' -145° 54.78' Eastern (221) 221-20-10340 60.69730270 -145.90960350 60° 41.84' -145° 54.58' Eastern (221) 221-20-10350 Koppen Creek 60.70610429 -145.89964789 60° 42.37' -145° 53.98' Eastern (221) 221-20-10359 60.71441917 -145.89942002 60° 42.87' -145° 53.97' Eastern (221) 221-20-10360 Sheep River 60.71466703 -145.89985701 60° 42.88' -145° 53.99' Eastern (221) 221-20-10365 Sahlin Creek 60.69209473 -145.96617547 60° 41.53' -145° 57.97' Eastern (221) 221-20-10370 *Allen Creek 60.66845273 -146.02467855 60° 40.11' -146° 01.48' Eastern (221) 221-20-10380 60.64440921 -146.12209265 60° 38.66' -146° 07.33' Eastern (221) 221-20-10387 60.63244208 -146.15694076 60° 37.95' -146° 09.42' Eastern (221) 221-20-10389 60.62998141 -146.17195076 60° 37.80' -146° 10.32' Eastern (221) 221-30-10400 *Gravina Point Creek 60.63843607 -146.26591256 60° 38.31' -146° 15.95' Eastern (221) 221-30-10410 *Pass Creek 60.66598515 -146.21647670 60° 39.96' -146° 12.99' Eastern (221) 221-30-10420 60.67754324 -146.20121915 60° 40.65' -146° 12.07' Eastern (221) 221-30-10430 60.68799555 -146.18503614 60° 41.28' -146° 11.10' 2 Revised – June 2020 Eastern (221) 221-30-10440 60.69661283 -146.15719033 60° 41.80' -146° 09.43' Eastern (221) 221-30-10450 *Plateau Creek 60.70675886 -146.12960551 60° 42.41' -146° 07.78' Eastern (221) 221-30-10458 60.70927025 -146.08140660 60° 42.56' -146° 04.88' Eastern (221) 221-30-10459 60.70963580 -146.07679528 60° 42.58' -146° 04.61' Eastern (221) 221-30-10460 *Comfort Creek 60.70950714 -146.07019641 60° 42.57' -146° 04.21' Eastern (221) 221-30-10461 60.71151877 -146.07306277 60° 42.69' -146° 04.38' Eastern (221) 221-30-10462 60.71212631 -146.07872056 60° 42.73' -146° 04.72' Eastern (221) 221-30-10465 60.72316092 -146.08605716 60° 43.39' -146° 05.16' Eastern (221) 221-30-10467 60.72897454 -146.07623677 60° 43.74' -146° 04.57' Eastern (221) 221-30-10468 60.73046086 -146.07371382 60° 43.83' -146° 04.42' Eastern (221) 221-30-10470 *Native Creek 60.73614416 -146.05721730 60° 44.17' -146° 03.43' Eastern (221) 221-30-10472 60.74277555 -146.06157708 60° 44.57' -146° 03.69' Eastern (221) 221-30-10480 *Beartrap Creek 60.75421557 -145.97472447 60° 45.25' -145° 58.48' Eastern (221) 221-30-10490 *Cataract Creek 60.75573717 -146.03869316 60° 45.34' -146° 02.32' Eastern (221) 221-30-10498 60.79399057 -146.04805919 60° 47.64' -146° 02.88' Eastern (221) 221-30-10500 Gravina River 60.79603833 -146.05285405 60° 47.76' -146° 03.17' Eastern (221) 221-30-10510 60.74562620 -146.13738170 60° 44.74' -146° 08.24' Eastern (221) 221-30-10513 60.73287759 -146.17246168 60° 43.97' -146° 10.35' Eastern (221) 221-30-10514 60.73620327 -146.20003842 60° 44.17' -146° 12.00' Eastern (221) 221-30-10516 East Fork Olsen Bay 60.75954392 -146.17536269 60° 45.57' -146° 10.52' Creek Eastern (221) 221-30-10517 West Fork Olsen Bay 60.75954392 -146.17536269 60° 45.57' -146° 10.52' Creek Eastern (221) 221-30-10520 Control Creek 60.74698533 -146.22524718 60° 44.82' -146° 13.51' Eastern (221) 221-30-10530 60.73084069 -146.22961391 60° 43.85' -146° 13.78' Eastern (221) 221-30-10540 *Carlsen Creek 60.71309751 -146.28469463 60° 42.79' -146° 17.08' Eastern (221) 221-30-10550 60.76202790 -146.29370029 60° 45.72' -146° 17.62' Eastern (221) 221-30-10560 *St Matthews Creek 60.77872720 -146.27203709 60° 46.72' -146° 16.32' Eastern (221) 221-30-10570 60.76822453 -146.31407621 60° 46.09' -146° 18.84' Eastern (221) 221-30-10590 60.76115901 -146.32461605 60° 45.67' -146° 19.48' Eastern (221) 221-30-10600 60.75738466 -146.32961203 60° 45.44' -146° 19.78' Eastern (221) 221-30-10610 60.73121030 -146.34906834 60° 43.87' -146° 20.94' Eastern (221) 221-30-10615 60.71749347 -146.37121880 60° 43.05' -146° 22.27' Eastern (221) 221-30-10620 60.70562195 -146.38320439 60° 42.34' -146° 22.99' Eastern (221) 221-30-10630 60.70543879 -146.38324782 60° 42.33' -146° 22.99' 3 Revised – June 2020 Eastern (221) 221-30-10640 *Coho Creek 60.68619717 -146.42635002 60° 41.17' -146° 25.58' Eastern (221) 221-30-10655 60.68695570 -146.51185372 60° 41.22' -146° 30.71' Eastern (221) 221-30-10670 60.69520929 -146.58925973 60° 41.71' -146° 35.36' Eastern (221) 221-30-10672 60.69491118 -146.59904128 60° 41.69' -146° 35.94' Eastern (221) 221-40-10674 60.71168165 -146.65508217 60° 42.70' -146° 39.30' Eastern (221) 221-40-10675 60.71297868 -146.65781635 60° 42.78' -146° 39.47' Eastern (221) 221-40-10677 60.72854546 -146.65651022 60° 43.71' -146° 39.39' Eastern (221) 221-40-10678 60.72056391 -146.63536082 60° 43.23' -146° 38.12' Eastern (221) 221-40-10680 60.71629581 -146.62477191 60° 42.98' -146° 37.49' Eastern (221) 221-40-10683 60.72864938 -146.62125046 60° 43.72' -146° 37.28' Eastern (221) 221-40-10685 60.73580773 -146.62765325 60° 44.15' -146° 37.66' Eastern (221) 221-40-10700 60.72930576 -146.57272083 60° 43.76' -146° 34.36' Eastern (221) 221-40-10710 *Two Moon Bay 60.72950561 -146.56859018 60° 43.77' -146° 34.12' Eastern (221) 221-40-10720 *Two Moon Creek 60.73125546 -146.52279026 60° 43.88' -146° 31.37' Eastern (221) 221-40-10729 60.73681928 -146.49581157 60° 44.21' -146°
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State Water Control Board Page 1 O F16 9 Vac 25-260-350 and 400 Water Quality Standards
    STATE WATER CONTROL BOARD PAGE 1 O F16 9 VAC 25-260-350 AND 400 WATER QUALITY STANDARDS 9 VAC 25-260-350 Designation of nutrient enriched waters. A. The following state waters are hereby designated as "nutrient enriched waters": * 1. Smith Mountain Lake and all tributaries of the impoundment upstream to their headwaters; 2. Lake Chesdin from its dam upstream to where the Route 360 bridge (Goodes Bridge) crosses the Appomattox River, including all tributaries to their headwaters that enter between the dam and the Route 360 bridge; 3. South Fork Rivanna Reservoir and all tributaries of the impoundment upstream to their headwaters; 4. New River and its tributaries, except Peak Creek above Interstate 81, from Claytor Dam upstream to Big Reed Island Creek (Claytor Lake); 5. Peak Creek from its headwaters to its mouth (confluence with Claytor Lake), including all tributaries to their headwaters; 6. Aquia Creek from its headwaters to the state line; 7. Fourmile Run from its headwaters to the state line; 8. Hunting Creek from its headwaters to the state line; 9. Little Hunting Creek from its headwaters to the state line; 10. Gunston Cove from its headwaters to the state line; 11. Belmont and Occoquan Bays from their headwaters to the state line; 12. Potomac Creek from its headwaters to the state line; 13. Neabsco Creek from its headwaters to the state line; 14. Williams Creek from its headwaters to its confluence with Upper Machodoc Creek; 15. Tidal freshwater Rappahannock River from the fall line to Buoy 44, near Leedstown, Virginia, including all tributaries to their headwaters that enter the tidal freshwater Rappahannock River; 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Development of Shenandoah River
    SDMS DocID 2109708 Decision Rationale Total Maximum Daily Load of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) for the Shenandoah River, Virginia and West Virginia I. Introduction The Clean Water Act (CWA) requires a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) be developed for those water bodies identified as impaired by the state where technology-based and other controls did not provide for attainment of water quality standards. A TMDL is a determination of the amount of a pollutant from point, nonpoint, and natural background sources, including a margin of safety, that may be discharged to a water qualit>'-limited water body. This document will set forth the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) rationale for establishing the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) of PGBs for the Shenandoah River. EPA's rationale is based on the determination that the TMDL meets the following 8 regulatory conditions pursuant to 40 CFR §130. 1) The TMDL is designed to implement applicable water quality standards. 2) The TMDL includes a total allowable load as well as individual waste load allocations and load allocations. 3) The TMDL considers the impacts of background pollutant contributions. 4) The TMDL considers critical environmental conditions. 5) The TMDL considers seasonal environmental variations. 6) The TMDL includes a margin of safety. 7) The TMDL has been subject to public participation. 8) There is reasonable assurance that the TMDL can be met. II. Background The Shenandoah River drains 1,957,690 acres of land. The watershed can be broken down into several land-uses. Forest and agricultural lands make-up roughly 1,800,000 acres of watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Camping Places (Campsites and Cabins) with Carderock Springs As
    Camping places (campsites and cabins) With Carderock Springs as the center of the universe, here are a variety of camping locations in Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Delaware. A big round of applause to Carderock’s Eric Nothman for putting this list together, doing a lot of research so the rest of us can spend more time camping! CAMPING in Maryland 1) Marsden Tract - 5 mins - (National Park Service) - C&O canal Mile 11 (1/2 mile above Carderock) three beautiful group campsites on the Potomac. Reservations/permit required. Max 20 to 30 people each. C&O canal - hiker/biker campsites (no permit needed - all are free!) about every five miles starting from Swains Lock to Cumberland. Campsites all the way to Paw Paw, WV (about 23 sites) are within 2 hrs drive. Three private campgrounds (along the canal) have cabins. Some sections could be traveled by canoe on the Potomac (canoe camping). Closest: Swains Lock - 10 mins - 5 individual tent only sites (one isolated - take path up river) - all close to parking lot. First come/first serve only. Parking fills up on weekends by 8am. Group Campsites are located at McCoy's Ferry, Fifteen Mile Creek, Paw Paw Tunnel, and Spring Gap. They are $20 per site, per night with a maximum of 35 people. Six restored Lock-houses - (several within a few miles of Carderock) - C&O Canal Trust manages six restored Canal Lock-houses for nightly rental (some with heat, water, A/C). 2) Cabin John Regional Park - 10 mins - 7 primitive walk-in sites. Pit toilets, running water.
    [Show full text]
  • Scenic Landforms of Virginia
    Vol. 34 August 1988 No. 3 SCENIC LANDFORMS OF VIRGINIA Harry Webb . Virginia has a wide variety of scenic landforms, such State Highway, SR - State Road, GWNF.R(T) - George as mountains, waterfalls, gorges, islands, water and Washington National Forest Road (Trail), JNFR(T) - wind gaps, caves, valleys, hills, and cliffs. These land- Jefferson National Forest Road (Trail), BRPMP - Blue forms, some with interesting names such as Hanging Ridge Parkway mile post, and SNPMP - Shenandoah Rock, Devils Backbone, Striped Rock, and Lovers Leap, National Park mile post. range in elevation from Mt. Rogers at 5729 feet to As- This listing is primarily of those landforms named on sateague and Tangier islands near sea level. Two nat- topographic maps. It is hoped that the reader will advise ural lakes occur in Virginia, Mountain Lake in Giles the Division of other noteworthy landforms in the st& County and Lake Drummond in the City of Chesapeake. that are not mentioned. For those features on private Gaps through the mountains were important routes for land always obtain the owner's permission before vis- early settlers and positions for military movements dur- iting. Some particularly interesting features are de- ing the Civil War. Today, many gaps are still important scribed in more detail below. locations of roads and highways. For this report, landforms are listed alphabetically Dismal Swamp (see Chesapeake, City of) by county or city. Features along county lines are de- The Dismal Swamp, located in southeastern Virginia, scribed in only one county with references in other ap- is about 10 to 11 miles wide and 15 miles long, and propriate counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Assessment
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Lucky Minerals (Montana), Inc. Lucky Minerals Project, Park County, MT Exploration License Application #00795 Prepared by Montana Department of Environmental Quality Hard Rock Mining Bureau 1520 East Sixth Avenue PO Box 200901 Helena, MT 59620-0901 October 13, 2016 Table of Contents 1 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ........................................................................................... 1 1.1 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 PURPOSE AND NEED ............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 HISTORICAL MINING AND PREVIOUS EXPLORATION DISTURBANCE ................. 2 1.3.1 Emigrant Mining District Chronology (Geologic Systems Ltd., 2015) ....................... 2 1.3.2 St. Julian Claim Block ........................................................................................................ 4 1.4 PROJECT LOCATION............................................................................................................... 4 1.5 AUTHORIZING ACTION ........................................................................................................ 9 1.6 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ....................................................................................................... 9 1.6.1 SCOPING ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy
    Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy Introduction Brook Trout symbolize healthy waters because they rely on clean, cold stream habitat and are sensitive to rising stream temperatures, thereby serving as an aquatic version of a “canary in a coal mine”. Brook Trout are also highly prized by recreational anglers and have been designated as the state fish in many eastern states. They are an essential part of the headwater stream ecosystem, an important part of the upper watershed’s natural heritage and a valuable recreational resource. Land trusts in West Virginia, New York and Virginia have found that the possibility of restoring Brook Trout to local streams can act as a motivator for private landowners to take conservation actions, whether it is installing a fence that will exclude livestock from a waterway or putting their land under a conservation easement. The decline of Brook Trout serves as a warning about the health of local waterways and the lands draining to them. More than a century of declining Brook Trout populations has led to lost economic revenue and recreational fishing opportunities in the Bay’s headwaters. Chesapeake Bay Management Strategy: Brook Trout March 16, 2015 - DRAFT I. Goal, Outcome and Baseline This management strategy identifies approaches for achieving the following goal and outcome: Vital Habitats Goal: Restore, enhance and protect a network of land and water habitats to support fish and wildlife, and to afford other public benefits, including water quality, recreational uses and scenic value across the watershed. Brook Trout Outcome: Restore and sustain naturally reproducing Brook Trout populations in Chesapeake Bay headwater streams, with an eight percent increase in occupied habitat by 2025.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Trout Program Maps
    SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2018 FOUR DOLLARS Inside: 2019 Trout Program Maps SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2018 Contents 5 How Sweet Sweet Sweet It Is! By Mike Roberts With support from the Ward Burton Wildlife Foundation, volunteers, and business partners, a citizen science project aims to help a magnificent songbird in the Roanoke River basin. 10 Hunting: A Foundation For Life By Curtis J. Badger A childhood spent afield gives the author reason to reflect upon a simpler time, one that deeply shaped his values. 14 Women Afield: Finally By John Shtogren There are many reasons to cheer the trend of women’s interest in hunting and fishing, and the outdoors industry takes note. 20 What’s Up With Cobia? By Ken Perrotte Virginia is taking a lead in sound management of this gamefish through multi-state coordination, tagging efforts, and citation data. 24 For The Love Of Snakes By David Hart Snakes are given a bad rap, but a little knowledge and the right support group can help you overcome your fears. 28 The Evolution Of Cute By Jason Davis Nature has endowed young wildlife with a number of strategies for survival, cuteness being one of them. 32 2019 Trout Program Maps By Jay Kapalczynski Fisheries biologists share the latest trout stocking locations. 38 AFIELD AND AFLOAT 41 A Walk in the Woods • 42 Off the Leash 43 Photo Tips • 45 On the Water • 46 Dining In Cover: A female prothonotary warbler brings caterpillars to her young. See page 5. ©Mike Roberts Left: A handsome white-tailed buck pauses while feeding along a fence line.
    [Show full text]
  • Backpacking: Bird Knob
    1 © 1999 Troy R. Hayes. All rights reserved. Preface As a new Scoutmaster, I wanted to take my troop on different kinds of adventure. But each trip took a tremendous amount of preparation to discover what the possibilities were, to investigate them, to pick one, and finally make the detailed arrangements. In some cases I even made a reconnaissance trip in advance in order to make sure the trip worked. The Pathfinder is an attempt to make this process easier. A vigorous outdoor program is a key element in Boy Scouting. The trips described in these pages range from those achievable by eleven year olds to those intended for fourteen and up (high adventure). And remember what the Irish say: The weather determines not whether you go, but what clothing you should wear. My Scouts have camped in ice, snow, rain, and heat. The most memorable trips were the ones with "bad" weather. That's when character building best occurs. Troy Hayes Warrenton, VA [Preface revised 3-10-2011] 2 Contents Backpacking Bird Knob................................................................... 5 Bull Run - Occoquan Trail.......................................... 7 Corbin/Nicholson Hollow............................................ 9 Dolly Sods (2 day trip)............................................... 11 Dolly Sods (3 day trip)............................................... 13 Otter Creek Wilderness............................................. 15 Saint Mary's Trail ................................................ ..... 17 Sherando Lake .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Non Minimum Roads by Watershed Condition Class
    Non Minimum Roads by Watershed Condition Class USFS_COND Not Associated with a Watershed RTE_NO ROUTE_NAME Length HUC12_NAME FH561.1 VA.623 1.49 FH561.2 VA.623 2.864371 FH598 VA.818&VA.682 0.020837 FH554 VA.625 1.678439 444C MILAM 0.013939 265 DRY RIVER WORK CENTER 0.019088 265A DRY RIVER WORK CENTER 0.049903 4040 TENN 0.227884 49030 SUGAR CAMP 0.463635 4041 VALLEY 0.076535 FH580 VA.663 2.7653 FH WV589 CO15, CO15/3 0.354756 USFS_COND Functioning at Risk RTE_NO ROUTE_NAME Length HUC12_NAME 765B SNAKE DEN SPUR 0.212038 Elk Creek-James River 35 PETITES GAP 0.03242 Otter Creek-James River 35 PETITES GAP 3.982893 Elk Creek-James River 361C CIGAR RIDGE 1.10046 Mill Creek-Cowpasture River 39 PEDLAR RIVER 6.768137 Lynchburg Reservoir-Pedlar River 39 PEDLAR RIVER 5.554507 Browns Creek-Pedlar River 1037 BROAD RUN 0.747509 Skidmore Fork-North River 104E PATTERSON R-O-W 0.193824 Upper South River 10800 HAZELNUT 0.625286 Trout Creek-Craig Creek 10800A HAZELNUT SPUR A 0.331626 Trout Creek-Craig Creek P7 PATTERSON SPECIAL USE 0.295912 Mill Creek-Craig Creek 225A BLACKS RUN 2.506454 Black Run-Dry River 39E THIRTEEN CROSSINGS 3.42817 Browns Creek-Pedlar River 1283 CAL CLARK 0.172632 Upper South River 1283 CAL CLARK 1.313025 Irish Creek FH589 VA.636 3.465131 Upper Johns Creek FH563 VA.615 8.545137 Hunting Camp Creek FH575 VA.641 2.385472 Tract Fork 1584A SPICK AND SPAN SPUR 0.306516 Buffalo Branch-Middle River 151R STONEY SWAMP SALE 0.322371 Rough Run-South Fork South Branch Potomac River 151R STONEY SWAMP SALE 0.458325 Hawes Run-South Fork South Branch
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Camping, Hiking and History at the Elizabeth Furnace Recreation Area
    Guide to Camping, Hiking and History At the Elizabeth Furnace Recreation Area George Washington and Jefferson National Forests Lee Ranger District 95 Railroad Avenue Edinburg, VA 22824 WB-S7-598-11-1 (540) 984-4101 12 Elizabeth Furnace Recreation Area Family Campground: This campground has 33 first-come, first-serve camp sites, picnic tables, and fire rings. During the summer sea- son there are warm water showers and flush toilets. In winter, vault toilets are open and water is available from a hand pump. Fees: In Season - $14/night, Off Season - $10/night. Passage Creek Bridge Picnic Area: The day use area includes picnic tables, vault toi- lets, open fields, access to several well blazed and maintained hiking trails (most notably the Massanutten/Tuscarora Trail), and fishing in Passage Creek. There is No Fee. A Virginia state fishing license and National Forest Stamp are re- quired year round. A Trout Stamp is needed from October 1 through June 15. Group Camping: There are two group sites. Site A accommodates 50 people; Site B can accommodate 25 people. Each site has tent pads, picnic tables, benches and a fire ring. No water is available. Please pack out your trash. Reservations and permit are required. To reserve: www.reserveamerica.com or call 1-888-448-1474. 2 11 Directions: From Strasburg, Virginia, travel 5.1 miles east on State Highway 55 to Waterlick, Virginia. From Waterlick, take State Highway 678 southwest. Travel for 4.8 miles to the recreation area entrance. From the Washington, D.C. Beltway (I-495) take 1-66 West approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment: Potomac River Sustainable Flow and Water Resources Analysis
    Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment: Potomac River Sustainable Flow and Water Resources Analysis April 2014 Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment: Potomac River Sustainable Flow and Water Resources Analysis United States Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District The Natural Conservancy Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin Final Report April 2014 Recommended citation: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, The Nature Conservancy, and Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin. 2014. Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment: Potomac River Sustainable Flow and Water Resources Analysis. Final Report. 107 pp. and 11 appendices. Cover photograph: Great Falls on the Potomac River as seen from Virginia. Jim Palmer (ICPRB) Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment Abstract The Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment (MPRWA) was a collaborative effort to assess the relationship between streamflow alteration and ecological response in the Potomac River and its tributaries in a study area defined as the Middle Potomac. The assessment is comprised of five distinct components: (1) a large river environmental flow needs assessment, (2) a stream and small rivers environmental flow needs assessment, (3) a projection of future water uses, (4) a stakeholder engagement process, and (5) development of a concept or scope for a strategic comprehensive plan for watershed management. This information can be used to balance and mitigate water use conflicts and prevent ecological degradation. To assess flow needs in the Potomac watershed, the Ecologically Sustainable Water Management (ESWM) approach was used for large rivers and the Ecological Limits of Hydrologic Alteration (ELOHA) framework was adapted for streams and small rivers. In the large rivers included in this study, based on currently available information, there has been no discernible adverse ecological impact on focal species due to human modification of flows.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potomac Watershed Partnership the Potomac Watershed Partnership Thethe Monocacymonocacy Catoctincatoctin Watershedwatershed Alliancealliance
    DevelopingDeveloping LocalLocal WorkgroupsWorkgroups andand AcquiringAcquiring FundingFunding: A Case Study From the Potomac River Watershed Bryan Seipp, Director of Restoration/Forester MissionMission StatementsStatements The Potomac The Monocacy & Watershed Partnership (PWP) Catoctin Watershed Alliance is a collaborative effort among coordinates the efforts of a federal, state, and local diverse group of stakeholders partners to restore the health of dedicated to the protection the land and waters of the the land and waters of the and restoration of the natural Potomac River Basin, thereby enhancing the quality of life resources in the MonocacyMonocacy && and overall health of the Catoctin watersheds. Chesapeake Bay. TheThe PotomacPotomac WatershedWatershed PartnershipPartnership Watershed Size: 14,670 sq. miles Population: Nearly 5 million Population: Nearly 5 million nd 2 Largest Contributor of Freshwater to the Chesapeake Bay Largest Contributor of Sediment to the Chesapeake Bay TheThe MonocacyMonocacy CatoctinCatoctin WatershedWatershed AllianceAlliance Watershed Size: 320,807 acres Third Fastest growing area in Maryland 78% of the Land Zoned Agricultural Lowest percentage of healthy riparian forests and wetlands Most forest tracts destroyed by gypsy moths and wildfire Highest levels of nutrient and sediment pollution Greatest development pressures in the Potomac basin DevelopmentDevelopment andand WorkWork PlansPlans PWPPWP Formed in 2000 through a USDA Forest Service Initiative. In its first year, the partnership completed a strategic forest assessment for the Potomac watershed to determine where the highest priority forestlands were in most need of restoration, in both rural and urban areas. At the time of the assessment, the Shenandoah River and the Monocacy River and Antietam Creek sub-watersheds had the lowest percentage of healthy riparian forests and wetlands; the highest levels of nutrient and sediment pollution; the most forest tracts destroyed by gypsy moths and wildfire; and some of the greatest development pressures in the Potomac basin.
    [Show full text]