DOCSLIB.ORG

The Criminal Justice System in Japan: Prosecution by UNAFEI

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Criminal Justice System in Japan: Prosecution by UNAFEI 107TH INTERNATIONALUNAFEI PAPER TRAINING COURSE UNAFEI PAPER THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN JAPAN: PROSECUTION I. PUBLIC PROSECUTORS B. Recruitment After completing such training, trainees A. Qualification can become a private attorney, a judge or a In Japan, a private attorney, a judge and public prosecutor. Roughly speaking, more a public prosecutor have quite the same than 500 trainees become private qualifications. There are other different attorneys, about 100 trainees become qualifications1, but they are so exceptional judges and about 40 to 80 trainees become and rare that only the important ones will public prosecutors annually. The possible be focused upon. reasons for the smallest number include To become a Japanese legal practitioner, the toughness of the work and frequent one must pass the National Bar transfers. If a judge or a public prosecutor Examination, which is one of the most quits his job, he can become a private difficult examinations. About 700 attorney, and most of them do so. At candidates (about three percent those who present, there are about 2,100 judges, 1,100 take the examination) pass each year. The public prosecutors and 16,000 private average age of successful candidates is attorneys in Japan. Similarly, a private about 28 years old. Since most candidates attorney also can become a judge or a public graduate from a university at the age of 22 prosecutor. However the number of such or so, most of the candidates study under judges or public prosecutors is quite small2. the financial support by their parents for several years. C. Organization and Training After passing the Examination, they In Japan, the prosecution system must take a two-year training course as comprises the Supreme Public Prosecutors legal trainees at the Legal Research and Office (headed by the Prosecutor-General), Training Institute of the Supreme Court. 8 High Public Prosecutors Offices (headed Legal trainees are government officials by a Superintending Prosecutor), 50 paid by the Supreme Court. The training District Public Prosecutors Offices (headed period consists of two phases: by a Chief Prosecutor) and 203 branches, (1) academic training at the Institute for and 438 Local Public Prosecutors Offices the first four months and the last four (consisting mainly of Assistant Public months; and Prosecutors3). (2) sixteen months of practical training. Regarding the size of district public Each trainee is dispatched to a prosecutors offices, the average office has certain prefectural district court, 10 public prosecutors. The smallest one public prosecutors office and private has only 5 public prosecutors, and the law office. largest one has more than 200 public This practical training enables the prosecutors. Each office has a Chief and a trainees to choose their future careers based on a comparison of each role. 2 In the last eight years, only 30 private lawyers have become subsequently judges. Only six professors 1 See, e.g., the Court Organization Law, Articles 41, or assistant professors in legal science in 42 and 44 (CJLJ p. 23), and the Public Prosecutors universities have become judges since 1969 other Office Law (hereinafter PPOL), Article 18. than Supreme Court Justices. 39 RESOURCE MATERIAL SERIES No. 53 Deputy Chief Prosecutor, who do not 1. Course for Third- and Fourth- investigate and handle trials, but rather, Year Public Prosecutors focus on supervisory and administrative The number of participants is limited to matters. Thus, for example, in the smallest approximately 40 at one time. It is office, only three public prosecutors conducted twice a year for a duration of actually investigate and prosecute cases. seven days each time. The purpose of this In small offices, the public prosecutor who course is to develop the expertise of public investigates and indicts a suspect, is the prosecutors who deal with general criminal same person who handles the trial. In cases. It consists of lectures and contrast, in large offices, two different discussions. The lectures are given by public prosecutors carry out these duties, experts in various fields, including senior working in either the Investigation public prosecutors, on fundamental Department (usually called “Criminal knowledge and skills necessary to perform Affairs Department”) or the Trial better as a public prosecutor, including Department. bookkeeping and accounting. Discussions First-year public prosecutors used to are based on real cases to find out how they work at one of the largest offices such as should deal with them for better Tokyo, Osaka or Sapporo for only one year. disposition. Since two years ago, they undergo a two- month training all together at the Research 2. Course for Eighth- and Ninth- and Training Institute of the Ministry of Year Public Prosecutors Justice. Afterwards, they are assigned to The number of participants is limited to a relatively large-sized public prosecutors approximately 40 at one time. It is office, other than the Tokyo office, for 10 conducted twice a year for a duration of two months. Then they are transferred every weeks each time. The purpose of this course two or three years. In their first ten years is to provide special expertise in the as public prosecutors, most of them work investigation and disposition of cases of tax at various sized offices. evasion, bribery, crimes related to public During their career, public prosecutors security, and various other complex receive three kinds of job-related training economic crimes. It also consists of lectures at the Research and Training Institute of by experts and senior public prosecutors, the Ministry of Justice, in addition to the and discussions based on relevant cases. first-year training described above. 3. Course for Twelfth- and Thirteenth-Year Public Prosecutors The number of participants is limited approximately 15 at one time. It is conducted once a year for a duration of one week. The purpose of the course is different 3 The number of assistant public prosecutors is about from the other courses. Considering that 900. Their qualification is different from public the participants are relatively senior and prosecutors’. They have to pass a special experienced, and that they are expected to examination conducted by the Ministry of Justice occupy a status in the hierarchical after working in a criminal justice agency for a structure of public prosecutors offices in certain period. See PPOL Article 18, paragraph 2. which they will be required to give advice They deal with mainly misdemeanors like theft and to junior staff members, the purposes of the traffic offenses. course are limited to administrative ones, 40 107TH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE UNAFEI PAPER such as developing knowledge and skills jeopardized. To harmonize these about personnel management and the requirements, Article 14 of the Public administration of the organization. It Prosecutors Office Law provides that “[the] consists of lectures by various individuals Minister of Justice may control and and discussions based on practical cases supervise public prosecutors generally7 in involving personnel or administrative regard to their functions.... However, in matters. regard to the investigation and disposition of individual cases, he may control only the D. Status (Independence and Prosecutor-General.8” The Minister of Impartiality) Justice cannot control an individual public Public prosecutors have a status prosecutor directly. equivalent to that of judges. They receive In addition, many public prosecutors are equal salaries according to the length of the assigned to key positions in the Ministry term in office. Their independence and of Justice, for example, as Vice-Minister of impartiality are also protected by law. Justice and Director-General of the They are thought to be impartial Criminal Affairs Bureau. representatives of the public interest. Aside from disciplinary proceedings, they E. Functions and Jurisdiction cannot be dismissed from office, suspended The different levels of public prosecutors from the performance of their duties or offices correspond to a comparable level in suffer a reduction in salary against their the courts. Consequently public will, with some exceptions.4 prosecutors exercise such functions such as Prosecutorial functions are part of the investigation, instituting prosecution, executive power vested in the Cabinet5, and requesting the proper application of law by the Cabinet is responsible to the Diet in courts, supervising the execution of their exercise.6 The Minister of Justice judgement and others which fall under should have the power to supervise public their jurisdiction (PPOL articles 4 to 6). prosecutors to complete his responsibility When it is necessary for the purpose of as a member of the Cabinet. However, investigation, they can carry out their prosecutorial functions have a quasi- duties outside their jurisdiction (CCP judicial nature, inevitably exerting an article 195). important influence on all sectors of criminal justice, including the judiciary and the police. If the functions were controlled by political influence, then the whole 7 “Generally” means, for example, to set up general criminal justice system would be guidance for crime prevention, the administrative interpretation of laws and how to dispose of affairs related to prosecution to maintain their uniformity. 4 See PPOL Article 25. Exceptions are stipulated in 8 This control was practiced only once in 1954. When Articles 22 (retirement), 23 (physical or mental public prosecutors investigated a big bribery case disability, etc.) and 24 (supernumerary official). The involving several high-ranking politicians and tried age of retirement is 63, except the Prosecutor- to arrest the Secretary-General of the majority General who retires at 65. party, the Minister of Justice, who belonged to the 5 The Cabinet consists of the Prime Minister and the same party, ordered the Prosecutor-General to avoid Ministers of State. Not less than half of the the arrest, effectively terminating the investigation. Ministers must be chosen from among the members However, since it produced severe criticism from of the Diet (Constitution, Articles 66 and 68).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Death Penalty in Japan: the Law of Silence Going Against the International Trend
    The Death Penalty in Japan: The Law of Silence Going against the International Trend International fact-finding mission Article 1 : All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. Article 2 : Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. n°505a October 2008 Tokyo Detention Centre FIDH - The Death Penalty in Japan: The Law of Silence / 2 Contents Introduction 4 I. The Japanese Context 6 Context and history of the application of the death penalty in Japan Actors Authorities Officials at Ministry of Justice Detention Centre Personnel Political Parties Civil society Lawyers victims’ families and detainees’ families NGOs and the movements in favour of abolition Religious representatives The influence of media II. Current debates 18 Secrecy Separation of powers Life imprisonment without parole and a toughening of penalties Fallacious arguments Justification by public opinion The confusion between the rights of victims and the death penalty The cultural argument III. Legal Framework 25 Domestic law and norms International law United Nations Japan ratified the United Nations Convention Against Torture in 1999 The Council of Europe The European Union The International criminal court (ICC) IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Police of Japan
    P OLICE OF JAPAN CONTENTS ……………………………………………………………………………………………………....... ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE & RESOURCES 1. Responsibilities 1 2. History 2 3. Organizational Structure 2 4. Human Resources 8 5. Budget 11 6. Equipment 12 COMMUNITY SAFETY 1. Community Policing 13 2. Crime Prevention 15 3. Countermeasures against Personal Safety-Threatening Cases 16 4. Sound Growth of Amusement Businesses 16 5. Preventing Deterioration of Public Morals 16 6. Countermeasures against Economic Crimes 17 7. Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency and Sound Development of Youth 18 8. Countermeasures against Cybercrime 21 SUPPORT FOR CRIME VICTIMS 1. Police Support for Victims 24 2. Cooperation with Private Organizations for Victim Support 25 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION 1. Overview 26 2. Fight against Organized Crimes 28 3. Firearms Control 30 4. Drug Control 31 5. Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing 34 6. Fight against Crime Infrastructures 35 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………....... TRAFFIC POLICE 1. Overview 36 2. Enforcement 36 3. ITS Developed by the Japanese Police 38 4. Driver’s License 39 5. Promotion of Traffic Safety Education and Campaigns 39 SECURITY POLICE 1. Overview 40 2. Various Activities 43 3. Crisis Management System after the Great East Japan Earthquake 45 CYBER SECURITY Strategy and Structure to Counter Cyber Threats 46 POLICE SCIENCE & INFO-COMMUNICATIONS 1. Police Info-Communications 48 2. Criminal Identification 51 3. National Research Institute of Police Science 52 INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION 1. Technical Assistance 55 2. International Cooperation in Fighting Transnational Crimes 57 Appendices 1. Number of Juveniles Arrested for Penal Code Offenses (2019) 59 2. Number of Penal Code Offenses Known and Cleared (2015-2019) 60 3. Numbers of Traffic Violations 61 1 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE & RESOURCES 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Safety Maps for Children in Japan: an Analysis from a Situational Crime Prevention Perspective
    Asian Criminology (2011) 6:131–140 DOI 10.1007/s11417-011-9113-z Community Safety Maps for Children in Japan: An Analysis from a Situational Crime Prevention Perspective Nobuo Komiya Received: 5 September 2011 /Accepted: 8 September 2011 / Published online: 22 September 2011 # The Author(s) 2011. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Recent years have witnessed several major crimes against children both inside, and in the vicinity of, schools in Japan. These criminal incidents have heightened parental and community concerns regarding the safety of children in school. From the perspective of situational crime prevention, this study attempts to examine the nature and characteristics of community safety maps designed for children. It assesses the potential benefits of these maps and analyzes the structural and cultural obstacles for their implementation. This paper calls for more research into further innovative crime prevention strategies that can be used in Japanese schools so as to prevent children from becoming victims of crimes. Keywords Community . Map . Crime opportunity . Risk prediction . Education . Child safety Introduction Japan has experienced a series of major crimes against children in the past decade. For example, there was a murder of eight children by a stranger in an elementary school in 2001 (Mainichi Newspapers, 27 November 2001). Between 2004 and 2005, four cases occurred in which elementary school children were abducted on their way home from school and subsequently murdered (Yomiuri Shimbun, 1 April 2004; The Nikkei, 10 December 2005). These criminal incidents against children heightened public concerns regarding child safety and parental anxiety regarding victimization of their children.
    [Show full text]
  • An Innocent Man: Hakamada Iwao and the Problem of Wrongful Convictions in Japan 無実の男・袴田巌 日本の冤罪問 題
    Volume 13 | Issue 6 | Number 2 | Article ID 4272 | Feb 09, 2015 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus An Innocent Man: Hakamada Iwao and the Problem of Wrongful Convictions in Japan 無実の男・袴田巌 日本の冤罪問 題 David T. Johnson How long, Lord, how long? criminal justice by focusing on the case of Hakamada Iwao, who was sentenced to death Hakamada Iwao (Letters from Prison, 1992) in 1968 and released in 2014 because of evidence of his innocence. The subject of I pray every day that Mr. Hakamada will be wrongful convictions has received little found innocent and released from death row. scholarly attention since Chalmers Johnson's classic account of the Conspiracy at Matsukawa Kumamoto Norimichi (2008), one of three (1972), which at the time he wrote was the judges who sentenced Hakamada to death in biggest cause célèbre in the annals of Japanese 1968 crime. In that case, three persons were killed by the sabotage of a train on the Tohoku line in A criminal case can go wrong in two main August 1949. Twenty persons were arrested, ways. A person who committed a crime can nineteen of them being Communists or labor escape punishment, or a person can be union leaders. In 1950, all 20 were convicted convicted and punished for a crime he or she by the Fukushima District Court, and five were did not commit (Simon, 2012, p.4). Every sentenced to death. But the prosecution's case criminal justice system makes mistakes of both came apart on appeal. By 1970, all of the kinds, but most cultures and criminal justice accused had been exonerated.
    [Show full text]
  • Racial Discrimination in Japan
    Joint Civil Society Report on Racial Discrimination in Japan to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) for its Consideration of the Tenth and Eleventh Combined Periodic Report of Japan (CERD/C/JPN/10-11), August 2018 submitted by ERD Net (Japan NGO Network for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination) ERD Net is a network of NGOs working for the elimination of racial discrimination in Japan. Since the launch of networking in 2007, it has continually intervened the review of human rights situations of Japan by the CERD and other UN human rights mechanisms. Contact: International Movement Against All Forms of Discrimination and Racism （IMADR） 1-7-1, Irifune, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan [email protected] Introduction Since the previous examination of the periodic reports of the Government of Japan by the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) in 2014, few positive steps have been taken to combat racial discrimination in the country. In 2016, the legislature adopted two new acts including the ‘Act on the Promotion of Efforts to Eliminate Unfair Discriminatory Speech and Behaviour against Persons Originating from Outside Japan (Hate Speech Elimination Act)’ and the `Act on the Promotion of the Elimination of Buraku Discrimination`. While those measures are welcoming, the gap between the national human rights framework and international human rights law, in particular the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD), remains wide. Despite the repeated requests from Japanese civil society including ERD Net and the UN human rights mechanisms, the Government has been unwilling to enact a comprehensive anti-discrimination law which includes discrimination based on race, colour, descent, national or ethnic origin.
    [Show full text]
  • An Estimated 400,000 Gathered in Tokyo on 23 May to Participate in the Campaign Has Collected Over 30 Million Signatures on a Pe
    BURAKU LIBERATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE 1-6-12, Kuboyoshl, Naniwa-ku, Osaka City, 556 Japan. 6 1982 TOKYO ANTI-NUKE RALLY DRAWS 400,000 AIMED AT SECOND UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY ON DISARMAMENT An estimated 400,000 gathered in Tokyo on 23 May to participate in rallies and other activities protesting nuclear weapons and vigor ously calling for peace. The Tokyo rallies were held as a part of a massive nationwide campaign calling for total nuclear disarmament. The campaign has collected over 30 million signatures on a petition* to be presented to the UN General Assembly this June. Japan is the only country in the world to have suffered the full hor rors of the atomic bomb. During the war leading up to this incom prehensible event, Japan pursued a fascist policy. The government and the LDP(Liberal Democratic Party) seem to have forgotten the grim message of the past, and are chomping at the bit to enter the current arms race. In vocal opposition to this dangerous trend, the BLL participated in the Tokyo rallies after a denunciation meeting against the Sayama case (see page ) held earlier that day. The BLL also plans to send a delegation to the second UN General Assembly on Disarmament this June to appeal to the UN delegates on the importance of preserving peace for the protection of human rights. A group of protesters against nuclear weapons at a Tokyo rally on 23 May. (photo: Mainichi Daily News, 24 May 82) IN THIS ISSUE: Tokyo Anti-Nuke Rally 1 Takaoka Claims no Buraku 4 Matsumoto Memorial Hall 2 Suiheisha : Founding 5 Denunciation of Sayama Case 3 The Suikoku Struggle (1923) .
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing the Notions of the Japanese and the U.S
    UCLA UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal Title Comparing the Notions of the Japanese and the U.S. Criminal Justice System: An Examination of Pretrial Rights of the Criminally Accused in Japan and the United States Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/18c6h0k1 Journal UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 14(1) Author DeSombre, Jean Choi Publication Date 1995 DOI 10.5070/P8141022081 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California COMPARING THE NOTIONS OF THE JAPANESE AND THE U.S. CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: AN EXAMINATION OF PRETRIAL RIGHTS OF THE CRIMINALLY ACCUSED IN JAPAN AND THE UNITED STATES Jean Choi DeSombret I. INTRODUCTION The focus of the U.S. criminal justice system is claimed to be procedural justice. It is believed that the way to protect the con- stitutional rights of the criminally accused is to make the system procedurally just. It is also believed that affording the accused full procedural protection will achieve the just result while check- ing the abuse of power by the state.' The Japanese system, on the other hand, emphasizes substantive justice. Unlike proce- dural justice, the principal aim of substantive justice is to achieve the just result, not the just process. If the accused is indeed guilty, the Japanese system is driven to find him guilty even if his fights are violated in the process of determining his guilt. The differing emphasis of the two criminal justice systems has resulted in the different treatment and rights of the criminally accused in Japan and in the United States. However, the differ- ence in the criminal defendant's rights during the pretrial stage of t Associate at Davis, Polk & Wardwell (New York).
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Chaplaincy in Japan from the Meiji Period to the Present
    Karma and Punishment: Prison Chaplaincy in Japan from the Meiji Period to the Present The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:40046423 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Karma and Punishment: Prison Chaplaincy in Japan from the Meiji Period to the Present A dissertation presented by Adam J. Lyons to The Committee for the Study of Religion in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Japanese Religions Harvard University Cambridge, Massachussetts April 2017 © 2017 Adam J. Lyons All Rights Reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Professor Helen Hardacre Adam J. Lyons Karma and Punishment: Prison Chaplaincy in Japan from the Meiji Period to the Present Abstract #$!%"&!%%'()*)!+,"*,*-./'%"0(!%+,"1$*0-*!,1."2!"#!$%3"!,"4*0*,"5(+6")$'"7'!8!" 0'(!+&"29:;:<9=9>3")+")$'"0('%',)"&*."5+1?%!,@"+,")$'"1$*0-*!,1."*1)!A!)!'%"+5"B$!," C?&&$!%)"%'1)%D"E$(!%)!*,"1$?(1$'%D"B$!,)F"%$(!,'%D"*,&",'G"('-!@!+,%"-!H'"#',(!H.FI" #$'"%+?(1'%"5+(")$!%"%)?&."*('"&(*G,"5(+6"*(1$!A*-"('%'*(1$D"!,)'(A!'G%"G!)$" 1$*0-*!,%D"*,&"%!)'"A!%!)%")+"0(!%+,%"*,&"('-!@!+?%"!,%)!)?)!+,%I"J"*(@?'")$*)")$'" 4*0*,'%'"6+&'-"+5"0(!%+,"1$*0-*!,1."!%"(++)'&"!,")$'"K?('"L*,&"C?&&$!%)"1+,1'0)"+5"
    [Show full text]
  • Racial Discrimination in Japan
    Joint NGO Report for the Human Rights Committee in response to the List of Issues Prior to Reporting CCPR/C/JP/QPR/7 <PART 1> submitted by Japan NGO Network for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (ERD Net) November 2020 Japan NGO Network for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (ERD Net) is a network of NGOs working for the elimination of racial discrimination in Japan. Since the launch of networking in 2007, it has continually intervened the review of human rights situations of Japan by the HR Committee, CERD and other UN human rights mechanisms. Contact: International Movement Against All Forms of Discrimination and Racism (IMADR） [email protected] NGOs contributing to the Report The International Movement Against All Forms of Discrimination and Racism (IMADR) Japan Network towards Human Rights Legislation for Non-Japanese Nationals & Ethnic Minorities Solidarity Network with Migrants Japan (SMJ) Human Rights Association for Korean Residents in Japan Research-Action Institute for Ethnic Korean Residents (RAIK) Korea NGO Center Center for Minority Issues and Mission Buraku Liberation League (BLL) Association of Indigenous Peoples in the Ryukyus (AIPR) All Okinawa Council for Human Right (AOCHR) JNATIP Japan Network Against Trafficking In Persons Japan Lawyers Network for Refugees Kanagawa MINTOREN Yokohama City Liaison Committee for Abolition of the Nationality Clause Hyogo Association for Human Rights of Foreign Residents National Network for the Total Abolition of the Pension Citizenship Clause (in random order) 1 Joint NGO
    [Show full text]
  • Japan: the Incorporation of Hokkaido
    Japan: The Incorporation of Hokkaido Minako Sakata From 1881-1908, under the penal code drafted by French jurist Boissonade, Hokkaido was Japan’s only penal colony. Regarding its geopolitical position in modern Japan, Hokkaido has been often called Naikoku shokuminchi, which translated literally is “internal colony.” This notion, however, does not necessarily have the same roots as the notion of internal colony in the context of a postcolonial agenda. Rather, the term Naikoku shokuminchi in Japanese historical terminology seems to be an expression of domestic inequity between Hokkaido and the mainland, without problematizing the historical process of actual colonization or incorporation of new territory. Thus, this concept has a somewhat ahistorical resonance, with the effect of blurring the historical position of Hokkaido in relation to Japanese nation state building. This terminology suggests that, even among historians, there is recognition that Hokkaido was a frontier which the Japanese, without question, had the right to own, occupy, and use, rather than a foreign land which became a Japanese periphery through a particular historical process. On the other hand, it is obvious that Hokkaido lay outside Japan in the early modern period. Much of the area of Hokkaido was called Ezoch. “Ezo” literally means “barbarian,” and it was used to refer to the Ainu. Thus “Ezochi” means the Ainu land. However, it is also true that Japanese administrators believed, even in the early modern period, that Ezochi was land rightfully ruled by the Japanese. Conversely, in Ainu oral tradition, they never represent the Japanese as a ruler but neighboring people who are sometimes good friends, sometimes evil.
    [Show full text]
  • Ramseyer 932.Pdf
    ISSN 1936-5349 (print) ISSN 1936-5357 (online) HARVARD JOHN M. OLIN CENTER FOR LAW, ECONOMICS, AND BUSINESS OUTCASTE POLITICS AND ORGANIZED CRIME IN JAPAN: THE EFFECT OF TERMINATING ETHNIC SUBSIDIES J. Mark Ramseyer Eric B. Rasmusen Forthcoming in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 932 09/2017 Harvard Law School Cambridge, MA 02138 This paper can be downloaded without charge from: The Harvard John M. Olin Discussion Paper Series: http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin_center The Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection: http://ssrn.com/abstract=3033266 Forthcoming Journal of Empirical Legal Studies JEL Numbers: H30, I26, I38, J49, K14, K38, K42 July 5, 2017 Address correspondence to: J. Mark Ramseyer Harvard Law School [email protected] Eric B. Rasmusen Indiana University Kelley School of Business [email protected] Outcaste Politics and Organized Crime in Japan: The Effect of Terminating Ethnic Subsidies * By J. Mark Ramseyer and Eric B. Rasmusen** Abstract: In 1969, Japan launched a massive subsidy program for the "burakumin" outcastes. The subsidies attracted the mob, and the higher incomes now available through organized crime compensated those burakumin who abandoned the legal sector for criminal careers. In the process, the subsidies gave new support to the tendency many Japanese already had to equate the burakumin with the mob. The government ended the subsidies in 2002. We explore the effect of the termination by merging 30 years of municipality data with a long-suppressed 1936 census of burakumin neighborhoods. First, we find that outmigration from municipalities with more burakumin increased after the end of the program.
    [Show full text]
  • Reportof2014nusliss.Pdf
    Table of Contents PREFACE………………………………………………………………………. 1. OVERVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL SUMMER SEMINAR ( ISS ) 1.1 PURPOSE……………………………………………………………………………………. 1.2 SEMINAR SCHEDULE IN 2014……………………………………………………. 1.3 LIST OF AFFILIATED UNIVERSITIES 2. SELF-INTRODUCTIONOF PARTICIPANTS IN ISS 3. REPORTS BY PARTICIPANTS IN ISS 3-1 Lecture 1 Japanese Contact Law 3-2 Lecture 2 International Relations of East Asia 3-3 Japanese Language Class 3-4 Research Visit (1) Corporate Behavior, Court and Bar, Correctional Institution (2) Independent Research 3-5 Other Activities (1) Homestay (2) Events with SOLV 4. MESSAGES FROM LEADERS OF PARTICIPANTS IN ISS PREFACE Prof. Dongkook KANG School of Law, Nagoya University The School of Law of Nagoya University hosted the third international summer seminar at its campus in Nagoya from August 5 to 28, 2014 in collaboration with three universities from South Korea (Seoul National University, Sungkyunkwan University and Kookmin University), five universities from China (Renmin University of China, Tsinghua University, Nanjing University, China University of Political Science and Law and Shanghai Jiao Tong University), two universities from Vietnam(Hanoi University of Law, Ho Chi Minh City University of Law), one university from Cambodia(Royal University of Law and Economics), one university from Indonesia(Gadjah Mada University), one university from Taiwan(National Taiwan University), and one university from Thailand(Thammasat University). This seminar was intended for students from these Asian universities, with which Nagoya University has formed partnerships—to offer students opportunities to discover and experience student life in Japan and to interact with students from other Asian countries. By taking part in the seminar, the students can be expected to sharpen their global sense and build human networks in East Asia.
    [Show full text]