DOCSLIB.ORG

Annotation of Human Rights 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annotation of Human Rights 2021 Annotation of the Alberta Human Rights Act 2021 EDITION Annotation of the Alberta Human Rights Act (2021 Edition) by the Alberta Civil Liberties Research Centre Mailing Address: 2350 Murray Fraser Hall University of Calgary Faculty of Law 2500 University Drive NW Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Phone: (403) 220-2505 Fax: (403) 284-0945 Alberta Civil Liberties Research Centre’s home page is located at: www.aclrc.com ACKNOWLEDGMENTS THE ALBERTA LAW FOUNDATION The Alberta Civil Liberties Research Centre is supported by a grant from the Alberta Law Foundation BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ALBERTA CIVIL LIBERTIES RESEARCH CENTRE Doreen Barrie, Chair; Salimah Janmohamed, Treasurer; Michael Greene; Patricia Paradis, and Anna-Maria Hubert. CONTRIBUTORS The staff and volunteers who contributed to this edition include: Maddison Canuel, J.D. Student Linda McKay-Panos, B.Ed., J.D., LL.M., Executive Director Sharnjeet Kaur, B.Ed., Administrator Staff and volunteers who contributed to previous editions include: Greg McMeekin, Preston Brasch, Royce Henning, Tristan Cones, Anne Jayne, Susan Radke, David Holub, Rosemary Casis, Bonnie Huemann, Margo Moyen, Mia Laister, Anthony Di Lello, Danielle Grover, Jan Goodwin, Sandra Smyth, Krishna Khoul, Lisa Marie Ellis, Michelle Lee, Rebekah Andres, Kerry Cundal, Jelena Markovic, Ronaliz Veron, and Ayodeji Otiti. ISBN # 1-896225-68-3 ANNOTATION OF ALBERTA HUMAN RIGHTS ACT Table of Contents A NOTE FOR READERS ................................................................................................................................... 3 ANNOTATION OF ALBERTA HUMAN RIGHTS ACT ................................................................................ 5 PREAMBLE ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5 EFFECT OF ACT ON PROVINCIAL LAWS ............................................................................................................................. 6 ALBERTA HERITAGE DAY ................................................................................................................................................... 8 CODE OF CONDUCT ......................................................................................................................................... 9 DISCRIMINATION RE PUBLICATIONS, NOTICES ................................................................................................................ 9 DISCRIMINATION RE GOODS, SERVICES, ACCOMMODATION, FACILITIES ................................................................... 16 BENEFIT BASED ON AGE .................................................................................................................................................... 34 MINIMUM AGE FOR OCCUPANCY ...................................................................................................................................... 35 DISCRIMINATION RE TENANCY ........................................................................................................................................ 35 REGULATIONS .................................................................................................................................................................... 39 EQUAL PAY .......................................................................................................................................................................... 39 DISCRIMINATION RE EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES ............................................................................................................ 41 APPLICATIONS AND ADVERTISEMENTS RE EMPLOYMENT ........................................................................................ 109 MEMBERSHIP IN TRADE UNION, ETC. ........................................................................................................................... 109 PROHIBITIONS REGARDING COMPLAINTS ................................................................................................................... 113 AMELIORATIVE POLICIES, PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................ 115 REASONABLE AND JUSTIFIABLE CONTRAVENTION .................................................................................................... 115 CROWN IS BOUND ........................................................................................................................................................... 120 FUND CONTINUED ........................................................................................................................................................... 120 GRANTS ............................................................................................................................................................................ 121 ALBERTA HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION ............................................................................................ 121 COMMISSION CONTINUED .............................................................................................................................................. 121 FUNCTIONS OF COMMISSION ......................................................................................................................................... 122 BY-LAWS .......................................................................................................................................................................... 122 DIRECTOR AND STAFF ................................................................................................................................................... 123 ANNUAL REPORT ............................................................................................................................................................ 123 ENFORCEMENT ............................................................................................................................................ 123 WHO MAY MAKE A COMPLAINT .................................................................................................................................... 123 SETTLEMENT OF COMPLAINT ........................................................................................................................................ 128 DIRECTOR'S POWERS RE COMPLAINT .......................................................................................................................... 131 INVESTIGATOR'S POWERS ............................................................................................................................................. 133 JUDGE'S ORDER ............................................................................................................................................................... 135 COPIES OF DOCUMENTS ................................................................................................................................................. 135 APPEAL TO CHIEF OF THE COMMISSION AND TRIBUNALS ....................................................................................... 135 REFERRAL TO HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL ................................................................................................................... 139 PARTIES ........................................................................................................................................................................... 141 CARRIAGE OF PROCEEDING ........................................................................................................................................... 143 PROCEDURAL RULES ....................................................................................................................................................... 143 QUESTION OF LAW .......................................................................................................................................................... 146 POWERS OF TRIBUNAL ................................................................................................................................................... 149 RECONSIDERATION ......................................................................................................................................................... 157 RETROACTIVE COMPENSATION LIMIT ......................................................................................................................... 157 EFFECT OF DECISION ...................................................................................................................................................... 157 ENTRY OF ORDER ........................................................................................................................................................... 164 APPEAL ............................................................................................................................................................................. 165 1 PROCEEDINGS AGAINST TRADE UNIONS, ETC. .......................................................................................................... 169 PROTECTION FROM GIVING EVIDENCE ........................................................................................................................ 170 PROTECTION FROM LIABILITY .....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in the Commonwealth
    Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in The Commonwealth Struggles for Decriminalisation and Change Edited by Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in The Commonwealth: Struggles for Decriminalisation and Change Edited by Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites © Human Rights Consortium, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NCND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN 978-1-912250-13-4 (2018 PDF edition) DOI 10.14296/518.9781912250134 Institute of Commonwealth Studies School of Advanced Study University of London Senate House Malet Street London WC1E 7HU Cover image: Activists at Pride in Entebbe, Uganda, August 2012. Photo © D. David Robinson 2013. Photo originally published in The Advocate (8 August 2012) with approval of Sexual Minorities Uganda (SMUG) and Freedom and Roam Uganda (FARUG). Approval renewed here from SMUG and FARUG, and PRIDE founder Kasha Jacqueline Nabagesera. Published with direct informed consent of the main pictured activist. Contents Abbreviations vii Contributors xi 1 Human rights, sexual orientation and gender identity in the Commonwealth: from history and law to developing activism and transnational dialogues 1 Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites 2
    [Show full text]
  • Vriend V. Alberta, Supreme Court of Canada
    Vriend v. Alberta, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 493 Delwin Vriend, Gala-Gay and Lesbian Awareness Society of Edmonton, Gay and Lesbian Community Centre of Edmonton Society and Dignity Canada Dignité for Gay Catholics and Supporters Appellants v. Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Alberta and Her Majesty’s Attorney General in and for the Province of Alberta Respondents and The Attorney General of Canada, the Attorney General for Ontario, the Alberta Civil Liberties Association, Equality for Gays and Lesbians Everywhere (EGALE), the Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF), the Foundation for Equal Families, the Canadian Human Rights Commission, the Canadian Labour Congress, the Canadian Bar Association -- Alberta Branch, the Canadian Association of Statutory Human Rights Agencies (CASHRA), the Canadian AIDS Society, the Alberta and Northwest Conference of the United Church of Canada, the Canadian Jewish Congress, the Christian Legal Fellowship, the Alberta Federation of Women United for Families, the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada and Focus on the Family (Canada) Association Interveners Indexed as: Vriend v. Alberta File No.: 25285. 1997: November 4; 1998: April 2. - 2 - Present: Lamer C.J. and L’Heureux-Dubé, Sopinka,* Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci, Major and Bastarache JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for alberta Practice -- Standing -- Charter challenge -- Teacher’s employment at college terminated because of his homosexuality -- Provincial human rights legislation not including sexual orientation as prohibited ground of discrimination -- Whether appellants have standing to challenge legislative provisions other than those relating to employment -- Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, ss. 1, 15(1) -- Individual’s Rights Protection Act, R.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality and Anothe
    CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 11/98 THE NATIONAL COALITION FOR GAY AND LESBIAN EQUALITY First Applicant THE SOUTH AFRICAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION Second Applicant versus THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE First Respondent THE MINISTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY Second Respondent THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE WITWATERSRAND Third Respondent Heard on : 27 August 1998 Decided on : 9 October 1998 JUDGMENT ACKERMANN J: Introduction [1] This matter concerns the confirmation of a declaration of constitutional invalidity of - (a) section 20A of the Sexual Offences Act, 1957; (b) the inclusion of sodomy as an item in Schedule 1 of the Criminal SACHS J Procedure Act, 1977 (“Schedule 1 of the CPA”); and (c) the inclusion of sodomy as an item in the schedule to the Security Officers Act, 1987 (“the Security Officers Act Schedule”); made by Heher J in the Witwatersrand High Court on 8 May 1998.1 These declarations were made and referred to this Court for confirmation under section 172(2)(a) of the 1996 Constitution.2 [2] The full order made by Heher J reads as follows: “1. It is declared that the common-law offence of sodomy is inconsistent with the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996. 2. It is declared that the common-law offence of commission of an unnatural sexual act is inconsistent with the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996 to the extent that it criminalises acts committed by a man or between men which, if committed by a woman or between women or between a man and a woman, would not constitute an offence.
    [Show full text]
  • (April 2015) Conservative Candidate Wildrose
    Election 2015 MLA Candidate Contact Info Current as of April 23, 2015 Liberal Constituency (April 2015) Conservative Candidate Wildrose Candidate NDP Candidate Candidate Lacombe-Ponoka Peter Dewit Ron Orr Doug Hart No Candidate • Central Alberta Christian High [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] School • College Heights Christian School Bay 14, Lacombe Centre Mall, Phone: (403)755-6280 (403) 963-4278 • Lacombe Christian School 5230 45 Street • Living Truth Christian School Lacombe, T4L 2A1 • Mamawi Atosketan Native School • Parkview Adventist Academy Phone: (888)343-3716 • Ponoka Christian School • Prairie Adventist Christian eSchool • Woodlands Adventist School Calgary-Currie Christine Cusaneli Terry DeVries Brian Malkinson Shelley Wark- • Banbury Crossroads School [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Martyn • Calgary Quest Children's Society • Maria Montessori Education Suite 80, 3915 - 51 Street SW Phone (403)648-5140 Phone: (587) 434-3062 Centre Calgary, T3E 6N1 321, 3132 26 St. NE • Mountain View Academy Calgary, AB T1Y 6Z1 • New Heights School & Learning Services Edmonton-Glenora Heather Klimchuk Don Koiziak Sarah Hoffman Karen Sevcik • Coralwood Adventist Academy [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] • Edmonton Menorah Academy • Elves Special Needs Society 14215 Stony Plain Road Phone: (780)809-1328 Phone: (780) 756-7310 • MAC Islamic Academy Edmonton, T5N 3R4 10998 124 St • Progressive Academy Edmonton, AB T5M
    [Show full text]
  • Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium
    Court File No: 26858 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA) BETWEEN: LITTLE SISTERS BOOK AND ART EMPORIUM B.C. CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION JAMES EATON DEVA AND GUY ALLEN BRUCE SMYTHE Appellants (Plaintiffs) and MINISTER OF JUSTICE AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Respondents (Defendants) ______________________________ APPELLANT'S FACTUM ______________________________ PART I - STATEMENT OF FACTS 1. The principal business of the Appellant, Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium ("Little Sisters") is the sale of books and magazines most of which are written by and for gay men and lesbians. Most of the books and magazines sold by Little Sisters are published in the United States and imported into Canada by Little Sisters. The Appellant, British Columbia Civil Liberties Association has demonstrated a longstanding, genuine and continuing concern for the rights of disadvantaged groups or individuals in Canada and has likewise opposed censorship of allegedly obscene books and magazines. Amended Statement of Claim, paras. 6, 7 & 2. Appellants' Record ("AR") Vol. I, pp. 37, 36. 2. From about 1985 and from time to time to the trial, hundreds of books and magazines that Little Sisters has purchased and sought to import into Canada have been detained, prohibited and/or destroyed by customs officials pursuant to the Customs Legislation on the grounds that the books and magazines were "obscene". Amended Statement of Claim, para. 8. AR Vol. I, pp. 37-38. 3. This case concerns the constitutionality of Tariff Code 9956(a) of Schedule VII (now Tariff Item 9899.00.00) and s.
    [Show full text]
  • Sandstone-Macewan Community Association and Great News Publishing
    APRIL 2018 DELIVERED MONTHLY TO 4,500 HOUSEHOLDS AC your SANDSTONEM EWAN THE OFFICIAL SANDSTONE & MACEWAN COMMUNITY NEWSLETTER CONTENTS MODERN WEST PLUMBING & HEATING 5 PRESIDENT’S LETTER 6 SAFE & SOUND: BICYCLE HELMET SAFETY “Making your home better than new” Experts in 7 AT A GLANCE design, print, 9 FOR ARTS’ SAKE: SPRING INTO THE ARTS Is your homeErwin at riskKnoll for extensive water damage? Many houses403-988-5945 built in your neighborhood were plumbed& targeted delivery 10 NEWS FROM THE FRIENDS OF NOSE HILL with Poly-BSpecializing (Polybutylene—grey in plumbing and heating water piping) which Commercial & Residential 10 SCHOOL SHOUT-OUTS: has been bannedPOLY-B REPLACEMENTdue to high susceptibility SPECIALIST to bursting QUEEN ELIZABETH SCHOOL NEWS and leaking.- DRAIN If CLEANING your PACKAGES home has-FIXTURES-TAPS Poly-B it is only a DISCOUNTS AVAILABLE - -TOILETS- 12 TAKE ON WELLNESS: TEACHING SEXUAL HEALTH matter of time-BOILER before SYSTEMS- pipes burst-HOT WATER causing TANKS- catastrophic 15% DISCOUNTS 10% DISCOUNTS damage! Modern West Contracting Inc. specializes in 12 MY BABYSITTER LIST the complete removal and conversion of Poly-B by a CALL NOW FOR POLY-B REMOVAL 13 BUSINESS CLASSIFIEDS professional and(THE experienced GREY PIPE) Master Plumber. Ease YOUR FREE QUOTE 403-243-7518 your worries by replacing this pipe in your home, save 14 REAL ESTATE UPDATE thousands on repairs, and add value to your property. 15 NORTH WEST COALITIONS: BREAKING DOWN THE 2016 EDI RESULTS Modern West Contracting Inc. has numerous references
    [Show full text]
  • CALGARY REGIONAL CONSORTIUM Annual Report 2019-2020
    & CALGARY REGIONAL CONSORTIUM Annual Report 2019-2020 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Assurance Statement 1 Message From the Executive Director 2 Members of the Board of Directors 2 Staff of the Calgary Regional Consortium 2 Mission and Vision 3 Provincial Priorities 3 Regional Context 3 Calgary Regional Consortium 4 Summary of Supports, 2019-2020 4 Goals, Strategies, Results and Stories of Impact 5 GOAL 1 5 GOAL 2 7 GOAL 3 9 GOAL 4 11 GOAL 5 13 GOAL 6 14 Alberta Regional Professional Development Consortia and the CRC 15 2019 - 2020 Provincial Context 15 Provincial Collaborative Initiatives 17 Trends in Professional Learning 19 Appendix A: Provincial Projects 21 Assurance Statement The Calgary Regional Consortium has prepared this report in accordance with the reporting requirements provided by Alberta Education in the Funding Manual for School Authorities 2019/20 school year. Alberta Education provides annual funding to the ARPDC/CRC to support Curriculum Implementation, as well as the identified priorities of Alberta Education. This report contains a summary of CRC’s outcomes and results in relation to the six broad goals for consortia including annual measures, examples of impact, and financial statements. The results of this report provide assurance of the CRC’s efficacy and impact as a professional learning provider to our stakeholders and Alberta Education for the provision of annual funding as defined in the Funding Manual. 1 Message From the Executive Director In a year like no other, this year’s annual report serves as an account of the Calgary Regional Consortium’s commitment to exceptional services for the education community.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Paths to Protect Non-Normative Families
    Corso di Dottorato in Studi Giuridici Comparati ed Europei XXXI ciclo Tesi di Dottorato Marital status discrimination in the allocation of rights, obligations, and benefits: Legal paths to protect non-normative families Relatore Dottoranda Prof. Roberto Toniatti Nausica Palazzo anno accademico 2017/18 Candidato: Nausica Palazzo Marital status discrimination in the allocation of rights, obligations, and benefits: Legal paths to protect non-normative families Relatore Prof. Roberto Toniatti Anno Accademico 2017/18 Indirizzo specialistico in scienze pubblicistiche XXXI ciclo Esame finale: 29 marzo 2019, ore 10.00 Commissione esaminatrice: Prof.ssa Luisa Antoniolli, Università di Trento Prof.ssa Elena Ioriatti, Università di Trento Prof. Francesco Palermo, Università di Verona To each and every person I met throughout this journey CONTENTS ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................... 7 PREFACE ........................................................................................................ 9 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY Introduction ...................................................................................................... 11 1. Why a dissertation in comparative (public) family law? ............................. 22 2. Comparative method and family law: a functionalist-plus approach .......... 28 3. Definitional section: what is “family”? ........................................................ 39 PART I: GENERAL PART WHAT IS THE PROBLEM? WHAT THE
    [Show full text]
  • Victimhood and Socio-Legal Narratives of Hate Crime Against Queer Communities in Canada, 1985-2003
    VICTIMHOOD AND SOCIO-LEGAL NARRATIVES OF HATE CRIME AGAINST QUEER COMMUNITIES IN CANADA, 1985-2003 b y Allyson M. Lunny A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the Doctoral degree. Centre of Criminology University of Toronto © Copyright by Allyson M. Lunny 2011 Victimhood and Socio-legal Narratives of Hate Crime Against Queer Communities in Canada, 1985-2003 Allyson M. Lunny Doctoral Degree Centre of Criminology University of Toronto 2011 Abstract This dissertation analyzes personal and institutional narratives that shape the Canadian phenomenon of anti-LGBT violence as hate crime and locate queers within and without the discursive figure of the responsible, legitimate and undeserving victim of hate crime. These socio-legal narratives were taken from interviews with LGBT community activists involved in anti-violence projects, mainstream and gay print news media reportage of two notable homicides, Parliamentary debates of the enhanced sentencing provision that sought to include ‘sexual orientation’ to the list of biased motivating factors, Senate witness testimony on the amendment to Canada’s hate propaganda statutes which sought to include ‘sexual orientation’ to the list of protected groups, interviews with police officers who had direct experience with anti-hate crime initiatives, and judicial reasons for sentence. Utilizing an interdisciplinary analysis and drawing on hate crime scholarship and victimology, this dissertation asks: how is legitimate and, consequently, illegitimate LGBT hate crime victimization being represented and constituted through Canadian socio-legal narratives? ii In revealing how socio-legal actors and institutions have positioned LGBT individuals discursively within or without legitimate victimhood, that is, within and without the status of innocent victim deserving of social empathy and socio-legal institutional response, my dissertation illustrates how the spectre of illegitimate victimization is repeatedly invoked in socio-legal narratives of anti-LGBT hate crime.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Court of Canada and the Judicial Role: an Historical Institutionalist Account
    THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA AND THE JUDICIAL ROLE: AN HISTORICAL INSTITUTIONALIST ACCOUNT by EMMETT MACFARLANE A thesis submitted to the Department of Political Studies in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada November, 2009 Copyright © Emmett Macfarlane, 2009 i Abstract This dissertation describes and analyzes the work of the Supreme Court of Canada, emphasizing its internal environment and processes, while situating the institution in its broader governmental and societal context. In addition, it offers an assessment of the behavioural and rational choice models of judicial decision making, which tend to portray judges as primarily motivated by their ideologically-based policy preferences. The dissertation adopts a historical institutionalist approach to demonstrate that judicial decision making is far more complex than is depicted by the dominant approaches within the political science literature. Drawing extensively on 28 research interviews with current and former justices, former law clerks and other staff members, the analysis traces the development of the Court into a full-fledged policy-making institution, particularly under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This analysis presents new empirical evidence regarding not only the various stages of the Court’s decision-making process but the justices’ views on a host of considerations ranging from questions of collegiality (how the justices should work together) to their involvement in controversial and complex social policy matters and their relationship with the other branches of government. These insights are important because they increase our understanding of how the Court operates as one of the country’s more important policy-making institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Violence in Alberta's Gender and Sexually Diverse Communities
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Research Centres, Institutes, Projects and Units Shift: The Project to End Domestic Violence 2015-02 Domestic Violence in Alberta’s Gender and Sexually Diverse Communities: Towards a Framework for Prevention Lorenzetti, Liza; Wells, Lana; Callaghan, Tonya; Logie, Carmen Lorenzetti, L., Wells, L., Callaghan, T., & Logie, C. (2014). Domestic violence in Alberta’s gender and sexually diverse communities: Towards a framework for prevention. Calgary, AB: The University of Calgary, Shift: The Project to End Domestic Violence. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/51904 Other Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca Domestic Violence in Alberta’s Gender and Sexually Diverse Communities: Towards a Framework for Prevention FEBRUARY 2015 Authors Liza Lorenzetti, PhD (c), RSW, Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary Lana Wells, MSW, RSW, Brenda Strafford Chair in the Prevention of Domestic Violence, Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary Tonya Callaghan, PhD, Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary Carmen Logie, PhD, Factor-Iwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto Acknowledgements Shift: The Project to End Domestic Violence gratefully acknowledges the Government of Alberta for contributing to the funding of this important research project. We would also like to thank two critical contributors that enhanced the research. Dr. Janice Ristock from the University of Manitoba who provided her expertise to ensure the research was comprehensive and Pam Krause, Executive Director of the Calgary Sexual Health Centre and a tireless advocate. Both of their time and expertise is deeply appreciated. Shift would also like to acknowledge a group of people who helped in the research, including: Elena Esina, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    VRJEND, LAW, M. V. H. 683 VRJEND V. ALBERTA, LAW V. CANADA, ONTARIO V. M. AND H.: THE LATEST STEPS ON THE WINDING PATH TO SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY CRAIG D. BAVIS. This article traces the continuing development of L 'auteurretrace I evolution du cadre d 'analyseque the analytical framework used by the Supreme la Cour supreme du Canada a utilise pour evaluer Court of Canada to evaluate infringements of la violation des droits a / 'egalite aux termes du par. equality rights challenged under s. I 5(1) of the 15(1) de la Chartc. // examine en premier lieu /es Charter. This is achieved through examining the arrets Vricnd, Law et M. C. II. a la lwniere de la Court's recent decisions in Vricnd, Law, and M. v. « trilogie » Thibaudeau, Miron et Egan. et des H. in the context of the claims heard in Andrews, causes qui 0111 suivi. II etudie / 'analyse initiate the 'equality trilogy' of Miron, Egan. and adoptee dans Andrews et jusqu a la decision avec Thibaudeau, and the subsequent equality cases avis minoritaire de /995; ii note que Vricnd heard by the Court. This article follows the initial marque rme etape decisive, que la reformulation de analytical framework introduced in Andrews, la methode de la Cour dons Law temoigne de la through the Court's split in I 995. It then examines volonte rmanime des juges de faire respecter subsequent cases, finding that Vricnd stands as a I egalite veritable, comme ifs / 'avaient deja signifie significant case in the evolution, and that the dans Andrews; et que la position utilisee par une Court's restatement of its method in Law minorite de juges en 1995 a ete abandonnee.
    [Show full text]