Arxiv:Nucl-Th/0203071V2 16 Sep 2002
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Nuclear weak-interaction processes in stars K. Langanke∗ Institut for Fysik og Astronomi, Arhus˚ Universitet, DK-8000 Arhus,˚ Denmark G. Mart´ınez-Pinedo† Department f¨ur Physik und Astronomie, Universit¨at Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland‡ (Dated: October 22, 2018) Recent experimental data and progress in nuclear structure modeling have lead to improved de- scriptions of astrophysically important weak-interaction processes. The review discusses these advances and their applications to hydrostatic solar and stellar burning, to the slow and rapid neutron-capture processes, to neutrino nucleosynthesis, and to explosive hydrogen burning. Spe- cial emphasis is given to the weak-interaction processes associated with core-collapse supernovae. Despite some significant progress, important improvements are still warranted. Such improve- ments are expected to come from future radioactive ion-beam facilities. Contents I. INTRODUCTION I. Introduction 1 The weak interaction is one the four fundamental II. Theoretical description 2 forces in nature. Like the other three – strong, elec- A. Weak interactions in nuclei 2 tromagnetic and gravitation – it plays a keyrole in many B. Nuclear models 4 astrophysical processes. This can be nicely illustrated by the observation that new insights into the nature of III. Hydrogen burning and solar neutrinos 6 the weak interaction usually were closely followed by the recognition of their importance in some astrophys- IV. Late-stage stellar evolution 10 A. General remarks 10 ical context. Shortly after Pauli postulated the exis- B. Shell-model electron capture and β decay rates 10 tence of the neutrino and Fermi developed the first theory C. Consequences of the shell model rates in stellar of weak interaction (Fermi, 1934), Gamow and Schoen- models 13 berg speculated about the possible role of neutrinos in stellar evolution and proposed their production in the V. Collapse and post-bounce stage 16 star as an important source for stellar energy losses A. Electron capture on nuclei 17 (Gamow, 1941; Gamow and Schoenberg, 1940, 1941). B. Neutrino rates 19 The development of the universal V A theory (Feyn- C. Delayed supernova mechanism 20 man and Gell-Mann, 1958) led Pontecorvo− to realize that VI. Nucleosynthesis beyond iron 23 the bremsstrahlung radiation of neutrino pairs by elec- A. S-process 24 trons would be a very effective stellar energy loss mecha- B. R-process 25 nism (Pontecorvo, 1959). Just after the discovery of neu- 1. Half-Lives 26 tral weak current Freedman (1974), Mazurek (1975), and arXiv:nucl-th/0203071v2 16 Sep 2002 2. The possible role of neutrinos in the r-process 29 Sato (1975) recognized that this interaction would result VII. The Neutrino Process 32 in a sizable elastic scattering cross section between neu- trinos and nucleons, leading to neutrino trapping during VIII. Binary Systems 33 the core collapse of a massive star in a type II supernova. A. Novae 33 The unified model of electroweak interaction (Glashow B. X-ray Bursts 34 et al., 1970; Salam, 1968; Weinberg, 1967) allows deriva- C. Type Ia Supernovae 35 tion of accurate cross sections for weak processes among IX. Conclusions and future perspectives 36 elementary particles (i.e. electrons, neutrinos, quarks), but also for neutron and protons if proper formfactors are Acknowledgments 38 taken into account which describe the composite nature of the nucleons. However, the situation is different for References 39 weak interaction processes involving nuclei. Clearly, the smallness of the weak interaction coupling parameter al- lows treatment of these processes in perturbation theory, reducing the calculation basically to a nuclear structure ∗Electronic address: [email protected] †Electronic address: [email protected] problem. However, it has been the inability to adequately ‡Present address: Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya, Edi- treat the nuclear many-body problem, which has – and fici Nexus, Gran Capit`a2, E-08034 Barcelona, Spain in many cases still does - introduced a substantial uncer- 2 tainty into some of the key weak interaction rates used in II. THEORETICAL DESCRIPTION astrophysical simulations. However, the recent few years have witnessed a tremendous progress in nuclear many- A. Weak interactions in nuclei body theory, made possible by new approaches and novel computer realizations of established models, but also by the availability of large computational capabilities. This kλ kλ νλ νλ progress allowed calculation of the rates for many of the νλ − + stellar weak-interaction processes involving nuclei with e − e νe νe νe significantly improved accuracy or for the first time. To − actually know that the calculations are more reliable, im- e − − kλ e e plies the availability of experimental data which test, con- − + strain and guide the theoretical models. Thus, the ad- orbital e − capture β decay β decay = ν − = ν + = ν + vances in modelling nuclear weak-interaction processes qλ λ kλ qλ λ kλ qλ λ kλ in stars also reflects the progress made by experimen- νλ ν ν talists in recent years which have succeeded to measure − λ λ ν kλ ν − e − l ν data which are relevant for the astrophysical applications l e − + discussed in this review either directly, e.g. half-lives for l l some short-lived nuclei on the r-process path (Pfeiffer kλ kλ − et al., 2001), or indirectly like the Gamow-Teller distri- bound state β decay continuum charged (anti)lepton capture butions for nuclei in the iron mass range (Osterfeld, 1992) qλ= ν λ + kλ qλ= ν λ − kλ which decisively constrain the nuclear models. Another kλ ν′ recent experimental first has been the measurement of λ − ν′ l l charged- and neutral-current neutrino-nucleus cross sec- ν tions. l νl ν λ νλ This review will report about progress in modelling ν′ nuclear weak-interaction processes and their possible im- kλ λ + −ν′ l l plications for stellar evolution and nucleosynthesis. We − −ν ν will restrict ourselves to advances achieved by improved l l nuclear models, treating the weak interaction within the νλ νλ standard model. Of course, it has long been recognized (anti)neutrino capture (anti)neutrino scattering (e.g. Sato and Sato, 1975) that stars can be used as lab- qλ= k λ − νλ qλ= ν′ λ − νλ oratories for fundamental physics (Raffelt, 1996) search- ing for new weakly interacting particles or constraining FIG. 1 Semileptonic weak processes that occur during the exotic components of the weak interaction outside the evolution of stars. For each process the hadronic current is standard model. This field is rapidly growing (see for ex- on the left and the leptonic current to the right. The dashed ample Corsico et al., 2001; Dom´ınguez et al., 1999; Raf- circle indicates a bound electron in the initial or final state. felt, 1996, 1999, 2000). The four-momentum transfer qλ = (−ω, q) for each pro- cess is given in terms of the charged lepton four-momentum kλ = (ǫ, k) and the neutrino four-momentum νλ = (ν, ν). Our review is structured as follows. Following a very ω, ǫ, and ν represent the energy transfer, lepton energy and brief discussion of the required ingredients of the weak neutrino energy, respectively. In the case of antiparticles the interaction we introduce the nuclear many-body mod- directions of the momenta are show as an arrow close to the els which have been used in the studies of the weak- four-momentum label. The first row shows the usual decay interaction processes (section II). The remaining sections modes in the laboratory. The second and third rows show are devoted to the results of these calculations and their processes that can occur under stellar conditions. applications to astrophysics which include the solar nu- clear reaction network and neutrino problem, the core Processes mediated by the weak interaction in stars collapse of massive stars, s- and r-process nucleosynthe- can be classified as leptonic (all interacting particles sis, neutrino nucleosynthesis, explosive hydrogen burning are leptons) and semileptonic (leptons interact with and type Ia supernovae. hadrons via the weak interaction). Leptonic processes can be straightforwardly computed using the standard Although generally quite important, weak-interaction electroweak model (Grotz and Klapdor, 1990). The cal- processes constitute only a part of the many nuclear re- culation of semileptonic processes (i.e. neutrino-nucleus actions occuring in stars. For recent reviews about other reactions, charged-lepton capture, and β-decay) is more stellar nuclear reactions networks and nucleosynthesis complicated due to the description of the nuclear states the reader is referred to the comprehensive and compe- involved. Fortunately the momenta of the particles turn tent work by (Arnould and Takahashi, 1999; Boyd, 2000; out to be small compared with the masses of the Z, W Smith and Rehm, 2001; Wallerstein et al., 1997). bosons. Thus it is sufficient to consider the semileptonic 3 processes of interest in the lowest-order approximation quence of this hypothesis the weak charge-changing vec- in the weak interaction. Then the interaction can be de- tor current is a conserved quantity. For the weak neutral scribed by a current-current Hamiltonian density: current one has MT = 0 and, in general, both T = 0 and T = 1 pieces can occur. The general form of this current is G (x)= µ(x)jµ(x), (1) H −√2J (0) 00 (0) 00 (1) 10 (1) 10 where G = G V for charge-current processes and µ = β V + β A + β V + β A . (3) F ud J V µ A µ V µ A µ G = GF for neutral current processes, with GF the Fermi coupling constant and Vud the up-down entry of Assuming that the coupling constants are given by the the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix (Groom et al., (0) 2 (0) Standard Model we have: β = 2 sin θW , β = 0, 2000).