DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix a Abbreviations and Notations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix a Abbreviations and Notations Appendix A Abbreviations and Notations For a better overview, we collect here some abbreviations and specific notations. Abbreviations ala Algebraic approach ana Analytical approach ClM Classical mechanics CONS Complete orthonormal system CSCO Complete system of commuting observables DEq Differential equation EPR Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox fapp ‘Fine for all practical purposes’ MZI Mach–Zehnder interferometer ONS Orthonormal system PBS Polarizing beam splitter QC Quantum computer QM Quantum mechanics QZE Quantum Zeno effect SEq Schrödinger equation Operators There are several different notations for an operator which is associated with a phys- ical quantity A; among others: (1) A, that is the symbol itself, (2) Aˆ, notation with hat (3) A, calligraphic typefont, (4) Aop, notation with index. It must be clear from the context what is meant in each case. For special quantities such as the position x, one also finds the uppercase notation X for the corresponding operator. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018 203 J. Pade, Quantum Mechanics for Pedestrians 1, Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00464-4 204 Appendix A: Abbreviations and Notations The Hamiltonian and the Hadamard Transformation We denote the Hamiltonian by H. With reference to questions of quantum informa- tion, H stands for the Hadamard transformation. Vector Spaces We denote a vector space by V, a Hilbert space by H. Appendix B Units and Constants B.1 Systems of Units Units are not genuinely natural (although some are called that), but rather are man-made and therefore in some sense arbitrary. Depending on the application or scale, there are various options that, of course, are fixed precisely in each case by convention. Those unit systems in which some fundamental constants are set equal to 1 and are dimensionless are generally referred to as natural unit systems. As we mentioned, the word ‘natural’ here is understood as part of the name and not as a descriptive adjective. We consider the following natural units: Planck units, the unit system of high-energy physics (theoretical units, also called natural units), and the unit system of atomic physics (atomic units). B.1.1 Planck Units Here, the speed of light c, the Planck constant , the gravitational constant G as well as the Boltzmann constant kB and the electric field constant (multiplied by 4π), 4πε0, are all set equal to 1. Their relations to the SI values are shown in the following table: Quantity Expression√ Value (SI) −18 Charge qP = 4πε0c 1.876 × 10 C Length l = G 1.616 × 10−35 m P c3 = c . × −8 Mass m P G 2 177 10 kg 2 Temperature T = m P c 1.417 × 1032 K P kB = lP . × −44 Time tP c 5 391 10 s © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018 205 J. Pade, Quantum Mechanics for Pedestrians 1, Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00464-4 206 Appendix B: Units and Constants The Planck scale probably marks a limit to the applicability of the known laws of physics. Distances substantially smaller than the Planck length cannot be considered as meaningful. The same holds true for processes that are shorter than the Planck time. Because of lP = ctP , such a process would take place on a distance scale that would be smaller than the Planck length. By comparison, the LHC accelerator has a spatial resolution of about 10−19 m; its accessible energy is of the order of ELHC = 10 TeV. B.1.2 Theoretical Units (Units of High-Energy Physics) Here, c and are set equal to 1; the other constants remain unchanged. The unit of energy is not determined by the choice of c and ; it is usually expressed in eV (or MeV, GeV etc.). Energy and mass have the same unit; this applies also to space and time. Quantity Unit Expression Value (SI) Energy eV 1.602 × 10−19 J Length 1/eV c/eV 1.973 × 10−7 m Mass eV eV/c2 1.783 × 10−36 kg 4 Temperature eV eV/kB 1.160 × 10 K Time 1/eV /eV 6.582 × 10−16 s In SI units, c = 3.1616 · 10−26 Jm = 0.1973 GeVfm. Since c = 1 in theoretical units, we have the rule of thumb 1fm(SI)=ˆ 5/GeV (TE) (B.1) B.1.3 Atomic Units In atomic units, e = me = = 1. These units, which are related to properties of the electron and the hydrogen atom, are mainly used in atomic and molecular physics. All quantities are formally dimensionless which are multiples of the basic units. If they are not dimensionless in SI units, they are generally marked by the formal ‘unit character’ a.u. (the dots are part of the unit symbol). The Hartree unit of energy is twice the ionization potential of the hydrogen atom. Appendix B: Units and Constants 207 Quantity Atomic unit Value (SI) Angular momentum Planck constant 1.055 × 10−34 Js Charge Elementary charge e 1.602 × 10−19 C −18 Energy Hartree energy Eh,H 4.360 × 10 J = . × −11 Length Bohr radius a0 mcα 5 292 10 m −31 Mass Electron mass me 9.109 × 10 kg Time unit Atomic time unit, 1 a.t.u. = 2.419 × 10−17 s Eh B.1.4 Units of Energy Energy is a central concept of physics, and this manifests itself among other things in the multitude of units used. The most common are summarized in the following table. Thereby, one uses E = ω = hν and c = λν. Unit Conversion factor Comment eV 1 Joule 1.602 × 10−19 J Kilowatt hour 4.451 × 10−26 kWh Calorie 3.827 × 10−20 cal Wavelength in nanometer 1239.85nm From E = hc/λ Frequency in Hertz 2.41797 × 1014 Hz From E = h/T (T = time) Wave number 8065.48cm−1 From E = hc/λ Temperature 11, 604.5K From E = kB T (T = temperature) Rydberg 0.07350 Ry Ionization potential of the H atom Hartree 0.03675H Energy equivalent mass, E/c 1.783 × 10−36 kg B.2 Some Constants Derived units in the SI: 1 N (Newton) = 1 kgms−2; 1 W (Watt) = 1 Js−1; 1 C (Coulomb) = 1 As 1 F (Farad) 0 1 AsV−1; 1T(Tesla)=1Vsm−2; 1 WB (Weber) = 1 Vs Important constants in eV: h = 4, 1357 · 10−16 eVs; = 6, 5821 · 10−16 eVs 2 2 2 2 4 −3 mec = 0, 511 MeV; mec α = 2 · 13, 6eV; mec α = 1, 45 · 10 eV 208 Appendix B: Units and Constants Quantity Symbol Value Unit Speed of light in vacuum c 299, 792, 458 (exact) ms−1 −7 −1 Magnetic field constant μo 4π × 10 (exact) TmA −12 −1 Electric field constant εo 8.85419 × 10 Fm Planck constant h 6.62618 × 10−34 Js (Reduced) Planck constant 1.05459 × 10−34 Js Elementary charge e 1.60219 × 10−19 C Newtonian gravitational constant G 6.672 × 10−11 m3 kg−1s−2 −23 −1 Boltzmann constant kB 1.381 × 10 JK −31 Rest mass of the electron me 9.10953 × 10 kg −27 Rest mass of the proton m p 1.67265 × 10 kg Fine structure constant α 1/137.036 Rydberg constant R 2.17991 × 10−18 J −11 Bohr radius ao 5.29177 × 10 m −15 Magnetic flux quantum o 2.068 × 10 Wb Stefan–Boltzmann constant σ 5.671 × 10−8 Wm−2 K−4 −24 −1 Magnetic moment of the electron μe 9.28483 × 10 JT −26 −1 Magnetic moment of the proton μp 1.41062 × 10 JT Large and small: Size comparisons Size of the universe 1028 m; diameter of an atomic nucleus 10−15 m; Planck length 10−35 m Ratio universe/Planck length 1063 B.3 Dimensional Analysis One advantage of physics over mathematics lies in the existence of physical units. Thus, one can test√ results, conjectures etc. by checking their units. Can e.g. the expression T = 2π l · g be correct? No, the unit of the left-hand side is s, while at the right hand side it is m/s. This principle can be applied constructively (so-called dimensional analysis, Buckingham π-theorem). As an example, consider once more the pendulum. The system data are the mass of the pendulum bob, the length of the string and the acceleration of gravity.√ A time (oscillation time or√ period) can be represented only by the combination l/g.Sowemust have T ∼ l/g. In addition, the physical units show that an expression such as eir (so long as r has the unit m) can not be right; alone for dimensional reasons, it must read eikr, where k has the unit m−1. Appendix B: Units and Constants 209 B.4 Powers of 10 and Abbreviations deci, d −1 deka, da 1 centi, c −2 hecto, h 2 milli, m −3kilo,k 3 micro, μ −6mega,M6 nano, n −9giga,G9 pico, p −12 tera, T 12 femto, f −15 peta, P 15 atto, a −18 exa, E 18 zepto, z −21 zetta, Z 21 yocto, y −24 yotta, Y 24 B.5 The Greek Alphabet Name Lower case Upper case Name Lower case Upper case alpha α A nu ν N beta β B xi ξ gamma γ omicron oO delta δ pi π epsilon ε, E rho ρ P zeta ζ Z sigma σ, ς (coda) eta η H tau τ T theta ϑ, θ upsilon υ Y iota ι I phi ϕ, φ kappa κ K chi χ X lambda λ psi ψ mu μ M omega ω Appendix C Complex Numbers C.1 Calculating with Complex Numbers In the algebraic representation, a complex number z is given by z = a + ib (C.1) where a ∈ R is the real part and b ∈ R the imaginary part of z (and not ib); a = Re (z) and b = Im (z).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lectures on Quantum Field Theory
    QUANTUM FIELD THEORY Notes taken from a course of R. E. Borcherds, Fall 2001, Berkeley Richard E. Borcherds, Mathematics department, Evans Hall, UC Berkeley, CA 94720, U.S.A. e–mail: [email protected] home page: www.math.berkeley.edu/~reb Alex Barnard, Mathematics department, Evans Hall, UC Berkeley, CA 94720, U.S.A. e–mail: [email protected] home page: www.math.berkeley.edu/~barnard Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Life Cycle of a Theoretical Physicist . ....... 4 1.2 Historical Survey of the Standard Model . ....... 5 1.3 SomeProblemswithNeutrinos . ... 9 1.4 Elementary Particles in the Standard Model . ........ 10 2 Lagrangians 11 arXiv:math-ph/0204014v1 8 Apr 2002 2.1 WhatisaLagrangian?.............................. 11 2.2 Examples ...................................... 11 2.3 The General Euler–Lagrange Equation . ...... 13 3 Symmetries and Currents 14 3.1 ObviousSymmetries ............................... 14 3.2 Not–So–ObviousSymmetries . 16 3.3 TheElectromagneticField. 17 1 3.4 Converting Classical Field Theory to Homological Algebra........... 19 4 Feynman Path Integrals 21 4.1 Finite Dimensional Integrals . ...... 21 4.2 TheFreeFieldCase ................................ 22 4.3 Free Field Green’s Functions . 23 4.4 TheNon-FreeCase................................. 24 5 0-Dimensional QFT 25 5.1 BorelSummation.................................. 28 5.2 OtherGraphSums................................. 28 5.3 TheClassicalField............................... 29 5.4 TheEffectiveAction ............................... 31 6 Distributions and Propagators 35 6.1 EuclideanPropagators . 36 6.2 LorentzianPropagators . 38 6.3 Wavefronts and Distribution Products . ....... 40 7 Higher Dimensional QFT 44 7.1 AnExample..................................... 44 7.2 Renormalisation Prescriptions . ....... 45 7.3 FiniteRenormalisations . 47 7.4 A Group Structure on Finite Renormalisations . ........ 50 7.5 More Conditions on Renormalisation Prescriptions .
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics Propagator
    Quantum Mechanics_propagator This article is about Quantum field theory. For plant propagation, see Plant propagation. In Quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, the propagator gives the probability amplitude for a particle to travel from one place to another in a given time, or to travel with a certain energy and momentum. In Feynman diagrams, which calculate the rate of collisions in quantum field theory, virtual particles contribute their propagator to the rate of the scattering event described by the diagram. They also can be viewed as the inverse of the wave operator appropriate to the particle, and are therefore often called Green's functions. Non-relativistic propagators In non-relativistic quantum mechanics the propagator gives the probability amplitude for a particle to travel from one spatial point at one time to another spatial point at a later time. It is the Green's function (fundamental solution) for the Schrödinger equation. This means that, if a system has Hamiltonian H, then the appropriate propagator is a function satisfying where Hx denotes the Hamiltonian written in terms of the x coordinates, δ(x)denotes the Dirac delta-function, Θ(x) is the Heaviside step function and K(x,t;x',t')is the kernel of the differential operator in question, often referred to as the propagator instead of G in this context, and henceforth in this article. This propagator can also be written as where Û(t,t' ) is the unitary time-evolution operator for the system taking states at time t to states at time t'. The quantum mechanical propagator may also be found by using a path integral, where the boundary conditions of the path integral include q(t)=x, q(t')=x' .
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2017/18)
    Thorsten Ohl 2018-02-07 14:05:03 +0100 subject to change! i Relativistic Quantum Field Theory (Winter 2017/18) Thorsten Ohl Institut f¨urTheoretische Physik und Astrophysik Universit¨atW¨urzburg D-97070 W¨urzburg Personal Manuscript! Use at your own peril! git commit: c8138b2 Thorsten Ohl 2018-02-07 14:05:03 +0100 subject to change! i Abstract 1. Symmetrien 2. Relativistische Einteilchenzust¨ande 3. Langrangeformalismus f¨urFelder 4. Feldquantisierung 5. Streutheorie und S-Matrix 6. Eichprinzip und Wechselwirkung 7. St¨orungstheorie 8. Feynman-Regeln 9. Quantenelektrodynamische Prozesse in Born-N¨aherung 10. Strahlungskorrekturen (optional) 11. Renormierung (optional) Thorsten Ohl 2018-02-07 14:05:03 +0100 subject to change! i Contents 1 Introduction1 Lecture 01: Tue, 17. 10. 2017 1.1 Limitations of Quantum Mechanics (QM).......... 1 1.2 (Special) Relativistic Quantum Field Theory (QFT)..... 2 1.3 Limitations of QFT...................... 3 2 Symmetries4 2.1 Principles ofQM....................... 4 2.2 Symmetries inQM....................... 6 2.3 Groups............................. 6 Lecture 02: Wed, 18. 10. 2017 2.3.1 Lie Groups....................... 7 2.3.2 Lie Algebras...................... 8 2.3.3 Homomorphisms.................... 8 2.3.4 Representations.................... 9 2.4 Infinitesimal Generators.................... 10 2.4.1 Unitary and Conjugate Representations........ 12 Lecture 03: Tue, 24. 10. 2017 2.5 SO(3) and SU(2) ........................ 13 2.5.1 O(3) and SO(3) .................... 13 2.5.2 SU(2) .......................... 15 2.5.3 SU(2) ! SO(3) .................... 16 2.5.4 SO(3) and SU(2) Representations........... 17 Lecture 04: Wed, 25. 10. 2017 2.6 Lorentz- and Poincar´e-Group................
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION– CONSCIOUSNESS– REALITY How a New Understanding of the Universe Can Help Answer Age-Old Questions of Existence the FRONTIERS COLLECTION
    THE FRONTIERS COLLECTION James B. Glattfelder INFORMATION– CONSCIOUSNESS– REALITY How a New Understanding of the Universe Can Help Answer Age-Old Questions of Existence THE FRONTIERS COLLECTION Series editors Avshalom C. Elitzur, Iyar, Israel Institute of Advanced Research, Rehovot, Israel Zeeya Merali, Foundational Questions Institute, Decatur, GA, USA Thanu Padmanabhan, Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics (IUCAA), Pune, India Maximilian Schlosshauer, Department of Physics, University of Portland, Portland, OR, USA Mark P. Silverman, Department of Physics, Trinity College, Hartford, CT, USA Jack A. Tuszynski, Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada Rüdiger Vaas, Redaktion Astronomie, Physik, bild der wissenschaft, Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany THE FRONTIERS COLLECTION The books in this collection are devoted to challenging and open problems at the forefront of modern science and scholarship, including related philosophical debates. In contrast to typical research monographs, however, they strive to present their topics in a manner accessible also to scientifically literate non-specialists wishing to gain insight into the deeper implications and fascinating questions involved. Taken as a whole, the series reflects the need for a fundamental and interdisciplinary approach to modern science and research. Furthermore, it is intended to encourage active academics in all fields to ponder over important and perhaps controversial issues beyond their own speciality. Extending from quantum physics and relativity to entropy, conscious- ness, language and complex systems—the Frontiers Collection will inspire readers to push back the frontiers of their own knowledge. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/5342 For a full list of published titles, please see back of book or springer.com/series/5342 James B.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarks and Gluons in the Phase Diagram of Quantum Chromodynamics
    Dissertation Quarks and Gluons in the Phase Diagram of Quantum Chromodynamics Christian Andreas Welzbacher July 2016 Justus-Liebig-Universitat¨ Giessen Fachbereich 07 Institut fur¨ theoretische Physik Dekan: Prof. Dr. Bernhard M¨uhlherr Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Christian S. Fischer Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Lorenz von Smekal Vorsitzende der Pr¨ufungskommission: Prof. Dr. Claudia H¨ohne Tag der Einreichung: 13.05.2016 Tag der m¨undlichen Pr¨ufung: 14.07.2016 So much universe, and so little time. (Sir Terry Pratchett) Quarks und Gluonen im Phasendiagramm der Quantenchromodynamik Zusammenfassung In der vorliegenden Dissertation wird das Phasendiagramm von stark wechselwirk- ender Materie untersucht. Dazu wird im Rahmen der Quantenchromodynamik der Quarkpropagator ¨uber seine quantenfeldtheoretischen Bewegungsgleichungen bes- timmt. Diese sind bekannt als Dyson-Schwinger Gleichungen und konstituieren einen funktionalen Zugang, welcher mithilfe des Matsubara-Formalismus bei endlicher Tem- peratur und endlichem chemischen Potential angewendet wird. Theoretische Hin- tergr¨undeder Quantenchromodynamik werden erl¨autert,wobei insbesondere auf die Dyson-Schwinger Gleichungen eingegangen wird. Chirale Symmetrie sowie Confine- ment und zugeh¨origeOrdnungsparameter werden diskutiert, welche eine Unterteilung des Phasendiagrammes in verschiedene Phasen erm¨oglichen. Zudem wird der soge- nannte Columbia Plot erl¨autert,der die Abh¨angigkeit verschiedener Phasen¨uberg¨ange von der Quarkmasse skizziert. Zun¨achst werden Ergebnisse f¨urein System mit zwei entarteten leichten Quarks und einem Strange-Quark mit vorangegangenen Untersuchungen verglichen. Eine Trunkierung, welche notwendig ist um das System aus unendlich vielen gekoppelten Gleichungen auf eine endliche Anzahl an Gleichungen zu reduzieren, wird eingef¨uhrt. Die Ergebnisse f¨urdie Propagatoren und das Phasendiagramm stimmen gut mit vorherigen Arbeiten ¨uberein. Einige zus¨atzliche Ergebnisse werden pr¨asentiert, wobei insbesondere auf die Abh¨angigkeit des Phasendiagrammes von der Quarkmasse einge- gangen wird.
    [Show full text]
  • The Standard Model and Electron Vertex Correction
    The Standard Model and Electron Vertex Correction Arunima Bhattcharya A Dissertation Submitted to Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad In Partial Fulllment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Department of Physics April, 2016 i ii iii Acknowledgement I would like to thank my guide Dr. Raghavendra Srikanth Hundi for his constant guidance and supervision as well as for providing necessary information regarding the project and also for his support in completing the project . He had always provided me with new ideas of how to proceed and helped me to obtain an innate understanding of the subject. I would also like to thank Joydev Khatua for supporting me as a project partner and for many useful discussion, and Chayan Majumdar and Supriya Senapati for their help in times of need and their guidance. iv Abstract In this thesis we have started by developing the theory for the elec- troweak Standard Model. A prerequisite for this purpose is a knowledge of gauge theory. For obtaining the Standard Model Lagrangian which de- scribes the entire electroweak SM and the theory in the form of an equa- tion, we need to develop ideas on spontaneous symmetry breaking and Higgs mechanism which will lead to the generation of masses for the gauge bosons and fermions. This is the rst part of my thesis. In the second part, we have moved on to radiative corrections which acts as a technique for the verication of QED and the Standard Model. We have started by calculat- ing the amplitude of a scattering process depicted by the Feynman diagram which led us to the calculation of g-factor for electron-scattering in a static vector potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Hadron Structure and the Feynman-Hellmann Theorem in Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics
    Hadron Structure and the Feynman-Hellmann Theorem in Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics Alexander John Chambers Supervised by Assoc. Prof. Ross Young and Assoc. Prof. James Zanotti Department of Physics School of Physical Sciences The University of Adelaide February 2018 Contents Abstract iii Declaration v Acknowledgements vii 1 Introduction 1 2 Quantum Chromodynamics 5 2.1 Mathematical Formulation . 6 2.2 Features and Dynamics . 8 3 Lattice QCD 11 3.1 Mathematical Formulation . 12 3.2 Systematics . 18 4 Hadronic Observables in Lattice QCD 21 4.1 Two-Point Functions and Spectroscopy . 22 4.2 Three-Point Functions and Matrix Elements . 29 5 The Feynman-Hellmann Theorem 37 5.1 Hamiltonian Quantum Mechanics . 38 5.2 Hamiltonian Lattice QCD . 41 5.3 Path-Integral Approach . 47 6 The Spin Structure of Hadrons 55 6.1 Connected Contributions . 57 6.2 Disconnected Contributions . 63 6.3 Conclusions and Outlook . 70 7 The Electromagnetic Structure of Hadrons: Form Factors 73 7.1 The Pion Form Factor . 78 7.2 The Nucleon Form Factors . 83 7.3 Conclusions and Outlook . 87 8 The Electromagnetic Structure of Hadrons: Structure Functions 95 8.1 Unpolarised Nucleon Structure Functions . 97 8.2 Conclusions and Outlook . 101 i ii Contents 9 Conclusions and Outlook 105 A Notational Conventions 107 B Minkowski and Euclidean Metrics 109 C Clifford Algebra and the Dirac Matrices 111 D Levi-Civita Symbol 113 E Special Unitary Groups 115 F Spin-Half Particles and the Dirac Equation 117 G Dirac Projectors, Traces and Vertex Functions 121 H Feynman-Hellmann Energy Shifts 127 I Ensembles 131 J Publications by the Author 133 References 135 Abstract The vast majority of visible matter in the universe is made up of protons and neutrons, the fundamental building blocks of atomic nuclei.
    [Show full text]
  • The Principles of Quantum Mechanics
    The Principles of Quantum Mechanics Erik Deumens University of Florida ORCID 0000-0002-7398-3090 Version: Final 6 - 16 Apr 2017 Before publication: c 2007-2017 Erik Deumens. All rights reserved. After publication in print or e-book: c 2018 Oxford University Press. All rights reserved Typeset in LATEXusing MikTeX. Graphics produced using PGF/Tikz Maple is a trademark of Waterloo Maple Inc. MATLAB is a registered trademark of MathWorks Inc. Mathematica is a registered trademark of Wolfram Research Inc. 1 Preface The premise of this book is that the principles of classical physics should follow from a correct and complete mathematics of quantum mechanics. The opposite approach has been taken since the origin of the \new" quantum mechanics in the 1920s, by discussing quantum mechanics as if it could be derived from classical physics. This has resulted in many issues of interpretation, and convoluted and incorrect mathematics. By applying the revised mathematics of quantum mechanics that I present in this book, it is possible to resolve some of the long standing issues in the field of quantum mechanics. As an example, the procedure of renormalization in quantum field theory can be given a precise meaning. The ideas in this book evolved over forty years of physics education and practice, and that journey is summarized below. In college, I enjoyed a wonderfully coherent education on classical physics. The team of professors in physics, chemistry and mathematics coor- dinated a curriculum that aligned physics concepts with mathematical foundations and methods. This enabled me to see the beauty, elegance, and coherence of classical physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded the Top 100 the Seed to This End
    PROC. OF THE 11th PYTHON IN SCIENCE CONF. (SCIPY 2012) 11 A Tale of Four Libraries Alejandro Weinstein‡∗, Michael Wakin‡ F Abstract—This work describes the use some scientific Python tools to solve One of the contributions of our research is the idea of rep- information gathering problems using Reinforcement Learning. In particular, resenting the items in the datasets as vectors belonging to a we focus on the problem of designing an agent able to learn how to gather linear space. To this end, we build a Latent Semantic Analysis information in linked datasets. We use four different libraries—RL-Glue, Gensim, (LSA) [Dee90] model to project documents onto a vector space. NetworkX, and scikit-learn—during different stages of our research. We show This allows us, in addition to being able to compute similarities that, by using NumPy arrays as the default vector/matrix format, it is possible to between documents, to leverage a variety of RL techniques that integrate these libraries with minimal effort. require a vector representation. We use the Gensim library to build Index Terms—reinforcement learning, latent semantic analysis, machine learn- the LSA model. This library provides all the machinery to build, ing among other options, the LSA model. One place where Gensim shines is in its capability to handle big data sets, like the entirety of Wikipedia, that do not fit in memory. We also combine the vector Introduction representation of the items as a property of the NetworkX nodes. In addition to bringing efficient array computing and standard Finally, we also use the manifold learning capabilities of mathematical tools to Python, the NumPy/SciPy libraries provide sckit-learn, like the ISOMAP algorithm [Ten00], to perform some an ecosystem where multiple libraries can coexist and interact.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrei Khrennikov Bourama Toni Editors
    STEAM-H: Science, Technology, Engineering, Agriculture, Mathematics & Health Andrei Khrennikov Bourama Toni Editors Quantum Foundations, Probability and Information STEAM-H: Science, Technology, Engineering, Agriculture, Mathematics & Health STEAM-H: Science, Technology, Engineering, Agriculture, Mathematics & Health Series Editor Bourama Toni Department of Mathematics Howard University Washington, DC, USA This interdisciplinary series highlights the wealth of recent advances in the pure and applied sciences made by researchers collaborating between fields where mathematics is a core focus. As we continue to make fundamental advances in various scientific disciplines, the most powerful applications will increasingly be revealed by an interdisciplinary approach. This series serves as a catalyst for these researchers to develop novel applications of, and approaches to, the mathematical sciences. As such, we expect this series to become a national and international reference in STEAM-H education and research. Interdisciplinary by design, the series focuses largely on scientists and math- ematicians developing novel methodologies and research techniques that have benefits beyond a single community. This approach seeks to connect researchers from across the globe, united in the common language of the mathematical sciences. Thus, volumes in this series are suitable for both students and researchers in a variety of interdisciplinary fields, such as: mathematics as it applies to engineering; physical chemistry and material sciences; environmental, health, behavioral and life sciences; nanotechnology and robotics; computational and data sciences; signal/image pro- cessing and machine learning; finance, economics, operations research, and game theory. The series originated from the weekly yearlong STEAM-H Lecture series at Virginia State University featuring world-class experts in a dynamic forum.
    [Show full text]
  • A Gentle Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Mechanics
    g = 2 A Gentle Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Mechanics John F. Lindner Physics Department The College of Wooster 2020 August 15 2 Contents List of Tables5 List of Figures7 1 Foreword1 2 Classical Electron3 2.1 Monopole and Dipole.........................3 2.2 Dipole and Angular Momentum...................6 2.3 Dipole Force and Torque.......................7 2.4 Electron Puzzle............................9 Problems.................................. 10 3 Schr¨odinger 11 3.1 Classical Wave-Particle Duality................... 11 3.2 Hamiltonian-Jacobi Examples.................... 12 3.3 Schr¨odingerEquation........................ 14 3.4 Operator Formalism......................... 16 Problems.................................. 17 4 Relativity 19 4.1 Linear Transformation........................ 19 4.2 Lorentz Transformation....................... 20 4.3 Velocity Addition........................... 23 Problems.................................. 24 5 Potentials & Momenta 25 5.1 Electric and Magnetic Potentials.................. 25 5.2 Momentum.............................. 26 5.2.1 Mechanical & Field Momentum............... 27 5.2.2 Hidden Momentum...................... 30 Problems.................................. 31 3 Contents 4 6 Dirac Equation 33 6.1 Free Electron............................. 33 6.2 Interacting Electron......................... 37 6.2.1 Pauli Equation........................ 37 6.2.2 Two Famous Identities.................... 39 6.2.3 Electron Magnetic Moment................. 40 Problems.................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bhabha Scattering 1 Bhabha Scattering
    Bhabha scattering 1 Bhabha scattering Feynman diagrams Annihilation Scattering Note: Time moves forward from the left side of the diagram to the right. The arrows are simply markers of particle motion, and are not the same as the arrows conventionally written into Feynman diagrams. In quantum electrodynamics, Bhabha scattering is the electron-positron scattering process: There are two leading-order Feynman diagrams contributing to this interaction: an annihilation process and a scattering process. The Bhabha scattering rate is used as a luminosity monitor in electron-positron colliders. Bhabha scattering is named after the Indian physicist Homi J. Bhabha. Differential cross section To leading order, the spin-averaged differential cross section for this process is where s,t, and u are the Mandelstam variables, is the fine-structure constant, and is the scattering angle. This cross section is calculated neglecting the electron mass relative to the collision energy and including only the contribution from photon exchange. This is a valid approximation at collision energies small compared to the mass scale of the Z boson, about 91 GeV; for energies not too small compared to this mass, the contribution from Z boson exchange also becomes important. Bhabha scattering 2 Mandelstam variables In this article, the Mandelstam variables are defined by Where the approximations are for the high-energy (relativistic) limit. Deriving unpolarized cross section Matrix elements Both diagrams contribute to the transition matrix element. By letting k and k' represent the four-momentum of the positron, while letting p and p' represent the four-momentum of the electron, and by using Feynman rules one can show the following diagrams give these matrix elements: Where we use: are the Gamma matrices, are the four-component spinors for fermions, while are the four-component spinors for anti-fermions (see Four spinors).
    [Show full text]