DOCSLIB.ORG

Doctoral Dissertation Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Doctoral Dissertation Template CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by SHAREOK repository UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE THE STORY OF MORAL CHARACTER: MORALITY, NARRATIVE, AND THE VALUE OF STRIVING A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By JESSICA E. BLACK Norman, Oklahoma 2018 THE STORY OF MORAL CHARACTER: MORALITY, NARRATIVE, AND THE VALUE OF STRIVING A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY BY ______________________________ Dr. Jennifer Barnes, Chair ______________________________ Dr. Robert Terry ______________________________ Dr. Ryan Brown ______________________________ Dr. Sherri Irvin ______________________________ Dr. David Liu © Copyright by JESSICA E. BLACK 2018 All Rights Reserved. For my parents, Marshall and Katie Black, who have waited a long time for me to finish my never-ending “education.” Acknowledgements This dissertation would not have been possible without the advice and support of numerous people to whom I will always be grateful. Without doubt the most important contributor to this project was my supervisor, Dr. Jennifer Barnes, who managed (mostly) to rein in my desire to study just about anything related to morality, imagination, and fiction. Dr. Robert Terry provided a further check on the complexity of my research designs by reminding me of many statistical perils in between frequent debates regarding teaching philosophy and (mutually reinforcing) political discussions. Over my five years at OU, many other professors have shared advice and knowledge that have become an integral part of how I think about research in psychology; to them, and to the staff that make it all possible, I will always be thankful. I would also like to acknowledge all the members of the Imagination and Development Lab. I’m particularly grateful Stephanie and Brian for making me no longer a club of one. I’d also like to thank all the many research assistants who helped in data collection, coding, and brainstorming; without you I would have far less data and hence far fewer papers needing to be written over the next few months or years. During this final year of my doctoral studies, I have been a dissertation fellow at the Institute for the Study of Human Flourishing, supported by a John Templeton grant. Not only did this allow me to focus on my research, it also provided a wonderful opportunity to interact with scholars from different disciplines. I am indebted to the other fellows at the Institute this year, Alex, Jing, Seth, and Jong, as well as others (especially Max and Kevin) who participated in our frequent discussions that covered not only topics vital to my own research, such as empathy and morality, but also iv tangentially related and equally fascinating subjects such as the nature of emotion, religiosity, and god. Finally, I would like to recognize the tolerance, responsibility, and independence of my two sons, Ian and Rodrigo. I have been a student for the past nine years (with one year off between Masters and doctoral programs), which amounts to half of Ian’s life and more than half of Rodrigo’s. They have tolerated moving house, a limited budget, and a mother who works at all hours and is frequently irritable. They’ve been, willingly or not, responsible and independent when it comes to money, homework, animal care, travelling alone, and occasionally living alone (academic conferences are blessings and annoyances for them). They are probably fully and forever inoculated against the desire to ever obtain a PhD (but they are undoubtedly also fully prepared to navigate any university campus, anywhere). v Table of Contents Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ................................................................................................................. xiii List of Figures ................................................................................................................ xiv Abstract ........................................................................................................................... xv Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 Moral Character Judgment ......................................................................................... 3 Morality and Individual Differences .......................................................................... 6 Moral Character Judgment, Narrative, and Imagination .......................................... 11 Contribution to the literature .................................................................................... 13 Research Questions and Hypotheses ........................................................................ 14 Study 1 ................................................................................................................ 14 Study 2 ................................................................................................................ 15 Study 3 ................................................................................................................ 21 Pilot Studies .................................................................................................................... 23 Study 1 ............................................................................................................................ 25 Method ............................................................................................................................ 25 Participants ............................................................................................................... 25 Procedure .................................................................................................................. 27 Materials ................................................................................................................... 28 Demographics ..................................................................................................... 28 Vignettes ............................................................................................................. 28 Data Analyses ........................................................................................................... 29 vi Power analyses ................................................................................................... 29 Stopping rule ...................................................................................................... 29 Data exclusion .................................................................................................... 29 Analyses ............................................................................................................. 30 Results. ........................................................................................................................... 30 Preliminary Analyses ................................................................................................ 30 Gender………………………………………………………………………….31 Primary Analyses ...................................................................................................... 31 Good outcomes. .................................................................................................. 31 Bad outcomes ..................................................................................................... 35 Post Hoc Analyses .................................................................................................... 35 Discussion ....................................................................................................................... 37 Study 2 ............................................................................................................................ 44 Participants and Procedure ....................................................................................... 45 Instrumentation ......................................................................................................... 45 Moral Foundations Questionnaire ...................................................................... 45 Big Five Inventory .............................................................................................. 47 Moral Identity Questionnaire ............................................................................. 47 Moral Agency Scale ........................................................................................... 47 Machiavellianism ............................................................................................... 47 Need for Cognition ............................................................................................. 48 Multiple Stimulus Types Ambiguity Tolerance ................................................. 48 Imaginative resistance ........................................................................................ 49 vii Data Analyses ........................................................................................................... 49 Results… ........................................................................................................................ 50 Preliminary Analyses ................................................................................................ 50 Primary Analyses .....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nightmare Magazine, Issue 33 (June 2015)
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Issue 33, June 2015 FROM THE EDITOR Editorial, June 2015 FICTION The Cellar Dweller Maria Dahvana Headley The Changeling Sarah Langan Snow Dale Bailey The Music of the Dark Time Chet Williamson NONFICTION The H Word: Why Do We Read Horror? Mike Davis Artist Gallery Okan Bülbül Artist Spotlight: Okan Bülbül Marina J. Lostetter Interview: Lucy A. Snyder Lisa Morton AUTHOR SPOTLIGHTS Maria Dahvana Headley Sarah Langan Dale Bailey Chet Williamson MISCELLANY Coming Attractions Stay Connected Subscriptions & Ebooks About the Editor © 2015 Nightmare Magazine Cover by Okan Bülbül Ebook Design by John Joseph Adams www.nightmare-magazine.com FROM THE EDITOR Editorial, June 2015 John Joseph Adams Welcome to issue thirty-three of Nightmare! ICYMI last month, the final installment of The Apocalypse Triptych — the apocalyptic anthology series I co-edited with Hugh Howey — is now available. The new volume, The End Has Come, focuses on life after the apocalypse. The first two volumes, The End is Nigh (about life before the apocalypse) and The End is Now (about life during the apocalypse) are also available. If you’d like a preview of the anthology, you’re in luck: You can read Annie Bellet’s The End Has Come story in the May issue of Lightspeed. Pop over there to read it, or visit johnjosephadams.com/apocalypse-triptych for more information about the book. • • • • In other news, this month also marks the publication of our sister- magazine Lightspeed’s big special anniversary issue, Queers Destroy Science Fiction! We’ve brought together a team of terrific queer creators and editors, led by guest editor and bestselling author, Seanan McGuire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moral Presentation of Self: Causes and Consequences of Perceptions of Politicians' Character Traits Scott Clifford
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2013 The Moral Presentation of Self: Causes and Consequences of Perceptions of Politicians' Character Traits Scott Clifford Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND PUBLIC POLICY THE MORAL PRESENTATION OF SELF: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF PERCEPTIONS OF POLITICIANS’ CHARACTER TRAITS By SCOTT CLIFFORD A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2013 Scott Clifford defended this dissertation on March 27, 2013. The members of the supervisory committee were: Jennifer Jerit Professor Directing Dissertation Art Raney University Representative Jason Barabas Committee Member Brad Gomez Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii This dissertation is dedicated to Kirsti for her unwavering care and support. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to Jennifer Jerit for all of her help and support. It is difficult to imagine an advisor that has devoted more time and energy to her graduate students. She has been endlessly supportive and I would not have come this far without her help. I would also like to thank Jason Barabas and Brad Gomez for all of their help and encouragement throughout the program. Finally, I would like to thank everyone in the FSU Department of Political Science, who created a fun and supportive environment and made a huge contribution to my professional development.
    [Show full text]
  • Shifting Liberal and Conservative Attitudes Using Moral Foundations
    PSPXXX10.1177/0146167214551152Personality and Social Psychology BulletinDay et al. 551152research-article2014 Article Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Shifting Liberal and Conservative 1 –15 © 2014 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc Attitudes Using Moral Reprints and permissions: sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Foundations Theory DOI: 10.1177/0146167214551152 pspb.sagepub.com Martin V. Day1, Susan T. Fiske1, Emily L. Downing2, and Thomas E. Trail3 Abstract People’s social and political opinions are grounded in their moral concerns about right and wrong. We examine whether five moral foundations—harm, fairness, ingroup, authority, and purity—can influence political attitudes of liberals and conservatives across a variety of issues. Framing issues using moral foundations may change political attitudes in at least two possible ways: (a) Entrenching: Relevant moral foundations will strengthen existing political attitudes when framing pro-attitudinal issues (e.g., conservatives exposed to a free-market economic stance) and (b) Persuasion: Mere presence of relevant moral foundations may also alter political attitudes in counter-attitudinal directions (e.g., conservatives exposed to an economic regulation stance). Studies 1 and 2 support the entrenching hypothesis. Relevant moral foundation-based frames bolstered political attitudes for conservatives (Study 1) and liberals (Study 2). Only Study 2 partially supports the persuasion hypothesis. Conservative-relevant moral frames of liberal issues increased conservatives’ liberal attitudes. Keywords morality, moral foundations, ideology, attitudes, politics Received July 1, 2013; revision accepted August 19, 2014 Our daily lives are steeped in political content, including 2012). Understanding the effectiveness of morally based many attempts to alter our attitudes. These efforts stem from framing may be consequential not only for politics but also a variety of sources, such as political campaigns, presidential for better understanding of everyday shifts in other opinions.
    [Show full text]
  • MORALITY in IRAN 1 in Press, Evolution and Human Behavior
    MORALITY IN IRAN 1 In press, Evolution and Human Behavior https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.07.014 Foundations of Morality in Iran Mohammad Atari1, Jesse Graham2, Morteza Dehghani1,3 1Department of Psychology, University of Southern California 2Department of Management, David Eccles School of Business, University of Utah 3Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California Author Note Correspondence regarding this article should be addressed to Mohammad Atari, [email protected], 362 S. McClintock Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90089-161 MORALITY IN IRAN 2 Abstract Most moral psychology research has been conducted in Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) societies. As such, moral judgment, as a psychological phenomenon, might be known to researchers only by its WEIRD manifestations. Here, we start with evaluating Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) using the Moral Foundations Questionnaire, and follow up by building a bottom-up model of moral values, in Iran, a non-WEIRD, Muslim-majority, understudied cultural setting. In six studies (N = 1,945) we examine the structural validity of the Persian translation of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire, compare moral foundations between Iran and the US, conduct qualitative interviews regarding moral values, expand the nomological network of “Qeirat” as a culture-specific set of moral values, and investigate the pragmatic validity of “Qeirat” in Iranian culture. Our findings suggest an additional moral foundation in Iran, above and beyond the five foundations identified by MFT. Specifically, qualitative studies highlighted the role of “Qeirat” values in Iranian culture, which are comprised of guarding and protectiveness of female kin, romantic partners, broader family, and country.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cognitive and Cultural Foundations of Moral Behavior T Benjamin Grant Purzyckia,*, Anne C
    Evolution and Human Behavior 39 (2018) 490–501 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Evolution and Human Behavior journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ens The cognitive and cultural foundations of moral behavior T Benjamin Grant Purzyckia,*, Anne C. Pisora, Coren Apicellab, Quentin Atkinsonc,d, Emma Cohene,f, Joseph Henrichg, Richard McElreatha, Rita A. McNamarah, Ara Norenzayani, Aiyana K. Willarde, Dimitris Xygalatasj a Department of Human Behavior, Ecology, and Culture, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Germany b Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, USA c Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, New Zealand d Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Germany e Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Oxford, UK f Wadham College, University of Oxford, UK g Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, USA h School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand i Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Canada j Department of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Does moral culture contribute to the evolution of cooperation? Here, we examine individuals' and communities' Morality models of what it means to be good and bad and how they correspond to corollary behavior across a variety of Cross-cultural ethnography socioecological contexts. Our sample includes over 600 people from eight different field sites that include for- Cognitive anthropology agers, horticulturalists, herders, and the fully market-reliant. We first examine the universals and particulars of Evolution of cooperation explicit moral models. We then use these moral models to assess their role in the outcome of an economic experiment designed to detect systematic, dishonest rule-breaking favoritism.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Capps Stephanie Carol
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE WHAT YOU READ AND WHAT YOU BELIEVE: GENRE EXPOSURE AND BELIEFS ABOUT RELATIONSHIPS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE BY STEPHANIE CAROL CAPPS Norman, Oklahoma 2017 WHAT YOU READ AND WHAT YOU BELIEVE: GENRE EXPOSURE AND BELIEFS ABOUT RELATIONSHIPS A THESIS APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY BY ______________________________ Dr. Jennifer Barnes, Chair ______________________________ Dr. Lara Mayeux ______________________________ Dr. Mauricio Carvallo © Copyright by STEPHANIE CAROL CAPPS 2017 All Rights Reserved. Table of Contents List of Tables ……………………………………………………………………………v List of Figures …………………………...……………………………………………..vi Abstract ………………………………………………………………………...……...vii Introduction …………………………...……………………………………………….. 1 Study 1 ……………………………………...………………………………………….. 9 Methods …………………………...……...………………………………………… 9 Participants ………………………………...……………………………………….. 9 Materials ………………………………………………………………………...… 10 Study 1 Results ……………………………………………………………………….. 12 Study 1 Discussion …………………………………………………………………… 15 Study 2 ………………………………………………………………………………... 16 Methods …………………………………………………………………………... 16 Participants ……………………………………………………………………….. 16 Materials ………………………………………………………………………….. 16 Procedure …………………………………………………………………………. 18 Study 2 Results …...…………………………………………………………………... 18 Study 2 Discussion .…………………………………………………………………... 20 General Discussion. …………………………………………………………………... 21 References ………………………………...………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Moral Judgment of Disparagement Humor
    Humor 2019; 32(4): 619–641 Karolina Koszałkowska* and Monika Wróbel Moral judgment of disparagement humor https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2018-0023 Abstract: The aim of the present study was to analyze the link between the five moral codes proposed in the Moral Foundations Theory and moral judgment of disparage- ment humor. We presented racist, sexist, homophobic, religion-disparaging and neutral jokes to a group of 108 participants, asking them whether they found laughing at a particular joke moral or immoral. Additionally, participants rated the level of amusement and disgust evoked by each joke. We also measured participants’ moral foundations profiles (Care, Fairness, Loyalty, Authority, and Sanctity). The results confirmed that Care and Fairness were significantly linked to moral judgment of racist, sexist and homophobic jokes, whereas Loyalty, Authority and Sanctity were associated with moral judgment of religion-disparaging jokes. Moreover, these relationships were mediated by emotional responses of amusement and disgust (except for racist jokes, for which we observed no mediating role of amusement). Keywords: disparagement humor, Moral Foundations Theory, moral judgment, amusement, disgust 1 Introduction Disparagement humor elicits amusement through the denigration, derogation, humiliation, victimization, or belittlement of individuals, social groups or ideol- ogies (Ferguson and Ford 2008; Zillmann 1983). Typical examples of such humor can be found in sexist, racist and anti-gay (homophobic) jokes (e.g. Ford and Ferguson 2004; Kochersberger et al. 2014; O’Connor et al. 2017). The use of disparagement humor is often justified by the simple “only joking” catchphrase (Johnson 1990), and is therefore not perceived as a wrongdoing. Studies suggest, however, that telling jokes that disparage a certain social group *Corresponding author: Karolina Koszałkowska, Institute of Psychology, University of Lodz, ul.
    [Show full text]
  • Award Winners
    RITA Awards (Romance) Silent in the Grave / Deanna Ray- bourn (2008) Award Tribute / Nora Roberts (2009) The Lost Recipe for Happiness / Barbara O'Neal (2010) Winners Welcome to Harmony / Jodi Thomas (2011) How to Bake a Perfect Life / Barbara O'Neal (2012) The Haunting of Maddy Clare / Simone St. James (2013) Look for the Award Winner la- bel when browsing! Oshkosh Public Library 106 Washington Ave. Oshkosh, WI 54901 Phone: 920.236.5205 E-mail: Nothing listed here sound inter- [email protected] Here are some reading suggestions to esting? help you complete the “Award Winner” square on your Summer Reading Bingo Ask the Reference Staff for card! even more awards and winners! 2016 National Book Award (Literary) The Fifth Season / NK Jemisin Pulitzer Prize (Literary) Fiction (2016) Fiction The Echo Maker / Richard Powers (2006) Gilead / Marilynn Robinson (2005) Tree of Smoke / Dennis Johnson (2007) Agatha Awards (Mystery) March /Geraldine Brooks (2006) Shadow Country / Peter Matthiessen (2008) The Virgin of Small Plains /Nancy The Road /Cormac McCarthy (2007) Let the Great World Spin / Colum McCann Pickard (2006) The Brief and Wonderous Life of Os- (2009) A Fatal Grace /Louise Penny car Wao /Junot Diaz (2008) Lord of Misrule / Jaimy Gordon (2010) (2007) Olive Kitteridge / Elizabeth Strout Salvage the Bones / Jesmyn Ward (2011) The Cruelest Month /Louise Penny (2009) The Round House / Louise Erdrich (2012) (2008) Tinker / Paul Harding (2010) The Good Lord Bird / James McBride (2013) A Brutal Telling /Louise Penny A Visit
    [Show full text]
  • The Drink Tank 252 the Hugo Award for Best Novel
    The Drink Tank 252 The Hugo Award for Best Novel [email protected] Rob Shields (http://robshields.deviantart.com/ This is an issue that James thought of us doing Contents and I have to say that I thought it was a great idea large- Page 2 - Best Novel Winners: The Good, The ly because I had such a good time with the Clarkes is- Bad & The Ugly by Chris Garcia sue. The Hugo for Best Novel is what I’ve always called Page 5 - A Quick Look Back by James Bacon The Main Event. It’s the one that people care about, Page 8 - The Forgotten: 2010 by Chris Garcia though I always tend to look at Best Fanzine as the one Page - 10 Lists and Lists for 2009 by James Bacon I always hold closest to my heart. The Best Novel nomi- Page 13 - Joe Major Ranks the Shortlist nees tend to be where the biggest arguments happen, Page 14 - The 2010 Best Novel Shortlist by James Bacon possibly because Novels are the ones that require the biggest donation of your time to experience. There’s This Year’s Nominees Considered nothing worse than spending hours and hours reading a novel and then have it turn out to be pure crap. The Wake by Robert J. Sawyer flip-side is pretty awesome, when by just giving a bit of Page 16 - Blogging the Hugos: Wake by Paul Kincaid your time, you get an amazing story that moves you Page 17 - reviewed by Russ Allbery and brings you such amazing enjoyment.
    [Show full text]
  • Award Winners
    Award Winners Agatha Awards 1992 Boot Legger’s Daughter 2005 Dread in the Beast Best Contemporary Novel by Margaret Maron by Charlee Jacob (Formerly Best Novel) 1991 I.O.U. by Nancy Pickard 2005 Creepers by David Morrell 1990 Bum Steer by Nancy Pickard 2004 In the Night Room by Peter 2019 The Long Call by Ann 1989 Naked Once More Straub Cleeves by Elizabeth Peters 2003 Lost Boy Lost Girl by Peter 2018 Mardi Gras Murder by Ellen 1988 Something Wicked Straub Byron by Carolyn G. Hart 2002 The Night Class by Tom 2017 Glass Houses by Louise Piccirilli Penny Best Historical Mystery 2001 American Gods by Neil 2016 A Great Reckoning by Louise Gaiman Penny 2019 Charity’s Burden by Edith 2000 The Traveling Vampire Show 2015 Long Upon the Land Maxwell by Richard Laymon by Margaret Maron 2018 The Widows of Malabar Hill 1999 Mr. X by Peter Straub 2014 Truth be Told by Hank by Sujata Massey 1998 Bag of Bones by Stephen Philippi Ryan 2017 In Farleigh Field by Rhys King 2013 The Wrong Girl by Hank Bowen 1997 Children of the Dusk Philippi Ryan 2016 The Reek of Red Herrings by Janet Berliner 2012 The Beautiful Mystery by by Catriona McPherson 1996 The Green Mile by Stephen Louise Penny 2015 Dreaming Spies by Laurie R. King 2011 Three-Day Town by Margaret King 1995 Zombie by Joyce Carol Oates Maron 2014 Queen of Hearts by Rhys 1994 Dead in the Water by Nancy 2010 Bury Your Dead by Louise Bowen Holder Penny 2013 A Question of Honor 1993 The Throat by Peter Straub 2009 The Brutal Telling by Louise by Charles Todd 1992 Blood of the Lamb by Penny 2012 Dandy Gilver and an Thomas F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moral Foundations of Illusory Correlation
    RESEARCH ARTICLE The moral foundations of illusory correlation Javier RodrõÂguez-Ferreiro1,2*, Itxaso Barberia1 1 Departament de CognicioÂ, Desenvolupament y Psicologia de la EducacioÂ, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 2 Institut de Neurociències, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain * [email protected] Abstract a1111111111 a1111111111 Previous research has studied the relationship between political ideology and cognitive a1111111111 biases, such as the tendency of conservatives to form stronger illusory correlations between a1111111111 negative infrequent behaviors and minority groups. We further explored these findings by a1111111111 studying the relation between illusory correlation and moral values. According to the moral foundations theory, liberals and conservatives differ in the relevance they concede to differ- ent moral dimensions: Care, Fairness, Loyalty, Authority, and Purity. Whereas liberals con- sistently endorse the Care and Fairness foundations more than the Loyalty, Authority and OPEN ACCESS Purity foundations, conservatives tend to adhere to the five foundations alike. In the present Citation: RodrõÂguez-Ferreiro J, Barberia I (2017) study, a group of participants took part in a standard illusory correlation task in which they The moral foundations of illusory correlation. PLoS were presented with randomly ordered descriptions of either desirable or undesirable ONE 12(10): e0185758. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0185758 behaviors attributed to individuals belonging to numerically different majority and minority groups. Although the proportion of desirable and undesirable behaviors was the same in the Editor: Kimmo Eriksson, MaÈlardalen University, SWEDEN two groups, participants attributed a higher frequency of undesirable behaviors to the minor- ity group, thus showing the expected illusory correlation effect. Moreover, this effect was Received: October 13, 2016 specifically associated to our participants' scores in the Loyalty subscale of the Moral Foun- Accepted: September 19, 2017 dations Questionnaire.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Orientations and Moral Foundations
    GLOBAL ORIENTATIONS AND MORAL FOUNDATIONS: A CROSS-CULTURAL EXAMINATION AMONG AMERICAN, CHINESE, AND INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS by Xiaomeng Hu A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Psychology Written under the direction of David Wilder And approved by ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey October 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Global Orientations and Moral Foundations: A Cross-Cultural Examination Among American, Chinese, and International Students By XIAOMENG HU Dissertation Director: David Wilder Although cross-cultural moral psychology is a rapidly growing research field in the past decades, little is known with respect to how human morality is affected by the process of globalization. The present research attempts to fill this gap by establishing a conceptual and empirical link between global orientations and moral foundations across three cultural populations. American domestic college students, Chinese domestic college students, and Chinese international college students completed a set of measures that assessed their global orientations (multicultural acquisition and ethnic protection), moral foundations, political affiliations, openness to experience, and demographic information. Results indicated that 1) multicultural acquisition was positively associated with participants’ endorsements of individualizing and binding values while ethnic protection was positively linked only to binding values; 2) The link between ethnic protection and individualizing foundations was moderated by culture; 3) sociocultural adaptation partially mediated the relationship between ethnic protection and binding values. These findings advance our understanding of the interrelations between individuals’ social psychological responses to globalization and their explicit value endorsements.
    [Show full text]