Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources And This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Attribute and Positional Accuracy Assessment of the Murray Darling Basin Project, Australia Fitzgerald, R.W.', Ritman, K.T. & Lewis, A. Abstract: The Murray Darling Basin comprises a land area of 1,058,000 km2 covering a substantial portion of SE Australia and encompassing Australia's largest river system. A basin wide woody vegetation dataset has been assembled from LANDSAT TM imagery supplemented with aerial photography at a nominal scale of 1: 100,000. The attribute accuracy assessment method is based on a multi-stage systematic sample design. A rectangular grid is placed over the entire Murray Darling Basin dataset and at each primary sample point, a secondary grid is created formed from a square contiguous set of aerial photos. A half tone, grey scale transparency covering approximately 10km2 is generated from satellite digital imagery (LANDSAT TM) for each primary grid point at a contact scale matching the available air photos. Overprinted on this transparency are the secondary grid points as patch size sampling frames. The air photos are then visually co-registered underneath the transparency with Landcover features from the LANDSAT TM image. Attribute data (presence or absence of woody vegetation) is collected directly from the air photos for each secondary grid point at 4 different patch sizes. Positional accuracy is assessed by recording 40 or more ground control points from the 1: 100,000 map sheet containing the primary grid point. These Eastings and Northings are compared to their position in the LANDSAT TM image. The outcome of the accuracy assessment is a Basin wide attribute and positional accuracy statement and spatial variability contour maps of attribute and positional accuracy as GIs overlays. INTRODUCTION This paper discusses the attribute and positional accuracy assessment I Infoplus, Po Box 125, Queanbeyan, NSW 2620, Australia. Fax: -+dl (0)6 299 1331, E-mail: bfitzger@pcug, org.au methodology developed for the Murray Darling Basin project2(MDBP). The Murray Darling Basin (MDB) covers an area exceeding 440 x 1: 100,000 map sheets with a total area of 1,058,000 krn2. The diverse range of vegetation and land forms creates challenges in terms of methodology and logistics. The initial focus of the accuracy assessment method include three stratification hypothesise. The first is that the local geographic variations in the classification accuracy is a function of vegetation type, terrain and substrate. Second, the smaller the patch of woody vegetation, the lower the attribute accuracy. Thirdly, the overall accuracy percentage is proportional to the percentage of vegetation cover. If the vegetation cover is patchy, then the ratio between the length of a boundary around a patch polygon and it's enclosed area is of interest. This ratio was examined by Crapper et.al. (1 986). The positional and accuracy assessment methodology will be: a. Statistically sound, practical, inexpensive to implement, easily understood by project staff and portable to MDBP's GIs; b. Produce scalable attribute and positional accuracy assessments of the woody1 non woody vegetation dataset as; I. Attribute accuracy assessment statistics (error matrix, user and producer accuracies and Kappa statistic) at different .. spatial scales; 11. Spatial variability maps of attribute and positional accuracy for the entire MDBP. A brief examination of the MDB woodylnon-woody GIs layer provided an insight into data quality and processing standards. The details of these standards including lineage are outlined in the Draft specification (Ritman, 1995). The Victorian & South Australian groups have examined attribute accuracy assessment methodologies. The work of Czaplewski et.al. (1 992) proved to be the most substantial and well documented attribute accuracy assessment methodology available. They used aerial photo interpretation as their pseudo ground truth and a systematic sample. Tadrowski et.al. (1990) in South Australia investigated supervised classification aided by manual photo interpretation and a stratified simple random sample for attribute accuracy assessment. The production of the digital woody vegetation dataset at a nominal Basin-wide scale of 1:100,000 was achieved by a two stage process (Ritman, 1995). Woody vegetation is defined as any perennial vegetation having a height exceeding 2m and a density greater than 20% crown cover (McDonald et.al., 1990). The first stage was the digital classification from LANDSAT TM imagery of a template of only woody vegetation. This method is based on that of Gilbee & Goodson (1992) and comprises an unsupervised 100 IS0 class cluster analysis of 2 This paper is a product of a consulting project titled "AtfributeAccuracy AssessmentJor Project M305", DLWC, September 1995, Murray Darling Basin Project M305. 318 LANDSAT TM imagery, followed by manual aggregation based on field input, aerial photos and ancillary data. In addition a filter (an ARCINFO AML process) designed to remove patches of cells diagonally and orthogonally connected, created by Dr. K. Ritman, was passed over the resulting woody vegetation layer to remove unconnected vegetation patches less than 0.25 ha.. The resultant woody dataset is in raster format with 25 x 25m pixels. The next stage was either a manual or digital classification of vegetation structural elements such as genus, density class and growth form. Only the woody vegetation layer is subject to the attribute and positional accuracy methodology described in this paper. A BRIEF REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE AND PREVIOUS STUDIES. Attribute classification accuracy is usually assessed by constructing a contingency table of a classified map versus ground truth or reference data (Congalton, 1991; Veregin ,1989). The resulting error or confusion matrix C is a k x k matrix where k is the number of discreet classes in the classification scheme. In the case of the MDB woodylnon-woody dataset, k = 2. The most commonly used index of attribute classification accuracy is the overall accuracy percent (OA%). Confidence limits for the OA% can be constructed easily from either the binomial distribution or the normal approximation to the binomial distribution. Van Genderen et.al. (1 978) logically extends the use of the binomial confidence limits to estimate sample sizes given expected classification accuracy and confidence levels. The OA% is a simple index of classification accuracy which has its limitations. The OA% can't differentiate between errors of omission and commission. Also it can not reliably be used to compare the performance of different error matrices with different sample sizes as well as not being able to account for correct classification by chance alone. One of the best methods developed to overcome these limitations is the Kappa statistic discussed extensively by Congalton (1 99 1) and Fitzgerald & Lees (1994a). It statistically quantifies the level of agreement and has been shown to give a less biased estimate of classification accuracy than the OA% (Rosenfield & Fitzpatrick- Lins, 1986). The effects of sampling schemes on classification accuracies especially when viewed across the spectral, spatial, environmental, taxonomical and temporal domains can induce substantial bias into classification. Congalton (1 988, 1991) compares the relative effects of five sampling schemes including random and stratified random sampling on classification accuracy. Franklin & Hiernaux (1 991) discuss the effect of sampling schemes on woody vegetation classification while Fitzgerald & Lees (1994b) discuss scale and its relationship to floristic structure. High accuracy surveying standards exist for assessing the accuracy of topographic maps in all three dimensions. The state and national mapping agencies are responsible for the surveying standards and integrity of the map base. The implicit assumption made in this study is that this map base is generally correcf Positional accuracy quantifies the accuracy of feature locations after various image processing and GIs transformations have been applied. A number of tests are available to assess positional accuracy including deductive estimates, internal evidence checks, comparisons to source documents and reference to independent sources of higher accuracy (Veregin, 1989). The latter is the most desirable and the one used in this study. The independent source is the AUSLIG 1: 1 00,000 map base series. Spatial variability maps of both attribute and positional accuracy will be produced for the MDB from this accuracy assessment methodology. The 12 x 18 primary systematic grid (described below) will contain the derived data values of OA% and Kappa (attribute accuracy) and 2D-RMS and CEP (positional accuracy). These gridded values will then be interpolated to a surface from which a contour map (isometric lines) of attribute and positional accuracy will be produced. The accuracy of this interpolation is dependant on the number and spatial distribution of the observed sample values. Systematic sampling (aligned or unaligned) is the best of all the sampling techniques tested to minimise the effects of spatial distribution on contouring (Veregin, 1989). SAMPLE DESIGN The constraints on the sample design for the attribute and positional accuracy assessment for the MDBP were as follows: a. The extent of the MDB (1 ,058,000km2) precludes field checking as the major source of ground truth. Aerial photo interpretation
Recommended publications
  • Procedures for Gathering Ground Truth Information for a Supervised
    -- - 1 NASA m 1015 c.1 NASA Reference Publication 1015 .- .~ LOAN COPY: RETUf AFWL TECHNICAL L, KfRTLAND AFB, N Procedures for Gathering Ground Truth Information for a Supervised Approach to a Computer-Implemented Land Cover Classification of Landsat-Acquired Multispectral Scanner Data Armond T. Joyce JANUARY 1978 NASA TECH LIBRARY KAFB, NM lllll~~llllllllllllilRlllllll~l OOb32i’3 NASA Reference Publication 1015 Procedures for Gathering Ground Truth Information for a Supervised Approach to a Computer-Implemented Land Cover Classification of Landsat-Acquired Multispectral Scanner Data Armond T. Joyce Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas National Aeronautics . and Space Administration Scientific and Technical Information Office 1978 CONTENTS Section Page SUMMARY................................ 1 INTRODUCTION ............................. 1 BACKGROUNDAND BASIC THEORY ...................... 2 FACTORS IN SELECTING TRAINING SAMPLE SITES .............. 3 Categorization of Land Surface Features ............... 3 Size and Shape of Training Sites .................. 7 Number and Distribution of Training Sites .............. 8 Homogeneity and Uniformity of Training Sites ............ 10 OPERATIONS BEFORE IMPLEMENTING FIELD PROCEDURES............ 13 Site Preselection By Use of Aerial Photography ........... 13 Site Referencing By Use of Prominent Surface Features ........ 14 Concentration of Sites ....................... 15 Acquisition of Aerial Photographs .................. 16 Use of Prints or Maps ........................ 17 Ground Truth
    [Show full text]
  • ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 142 (2018) 292–300
    ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 142 (2018) 292–300 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/isprsjprs The effects of imperfect reference data on remote sensing-assisted estimators T of land cover class proportions ⁎ Ronald E. McRobertsa, , Stephen V. Stehmanb, Greg C. Liknesa, Erik Næssetc, Christophe Sannierd, Brian F. Waltersa a Northern Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Saint Paul, MN, USA b Forest and Natural Resources Management, State University of New York, Syracuse, NY, USA c Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway d Systèmes d'Information à Référence Spatiale (SIRS), Villeneuve d'Ascq, France ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The gain-loss approach for greenhouse gas inventories requires estimates of areas of human activity and esti- Intepreter error mates of emissions per unit area for each activity. Stratified sampling and estimation have emerged as a popular Bias and useful statistical approach for estimation of activity areas. With this approach, a map depicting classes of Precision activity is used to stratify the area of interest. For each map class used as a stratum, map units are randomly Greenhouse gas inventory selected and assessed with respect to an attribute such as forest/non-forest or forest land cover change. Ground Gain-loss method observations are generally accepted as the most accurate source of information for these assessments but may be cost-prohibitive to acquire for remote and inaccessible forest regions. In lieu of ground observations, visual interpretations of remotely sensed data such as aerial imagery or satellite imagery are often used with the caveat that the interpretations must be of greater quality than the map data.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Truth Studies Teacher Handbook
    DRAFT VER / 1.1 N GLO E B P A S L A C H E A T N U G IT E INST Ground Truth Studies Teacher Handbook © ASPEN GLOBAL CHANGE INSTITUTE 1995 GROUND TRUTH STUDIES i Printing History First U.S. Edition First Printing June 1992 Second Printing July 1993 Canadian Edition First Printing June 1994 Second U.S. Edition Third Printing June 1995 Forth Printing December 2000 Subsequent Printings by Print on Demand © 1992, 1995, 2003 Aspen Global Change Institute All rights reserved. For reproduction in whole or part, obtain permission from the— Aspen Global Change Institute 100 East Francis Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 tel 970 925 7376 fax 970 925 7097 email [email protected] homepage http://www.agci.org Printed on 100% recycled paper using soy-based inks. Contributing Authors Jesse Boyce; Susan Hassol; John Katzenberger; Martha Kirpes; Anthony Leiserowitz; William Stapp. Design and Production Kelly Alford/Words Colors Pictures. Acknowledgments The GTS Teacher Handbook is a cross-disciplinary synthesis of the talents, skills and wisdom of an international group of scientists and educators. A heartfelt thank-you to them all. The Curriculum Development Team Mr. Walter Bogan, AAAS; Dr. Cheryl Charles, Project WILD; Mr. Gregory Cox, University of Alabama/Huntsville; Dr. William Kuhn, University of Michigan; Dr. James Lawless, NASA; Dr. Milton McClaren, Simon Fraser University; Dr. William Stapp, University of Michigan; and Mr. Thomas Wagner, ERIM. Pilot Teachers Ms. Elaine Bonds, Aspen Elementary School, Aspen, CO; Ms. Vicki Clark, Mathematics & Science Center, Richmond, VA; Ms. Cheryl Cleeves, Clifford Elementary School, Redwood City, CA; Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Photointerpretation and Satellite Imagery Analysis Techniques for Mapping Cattail Coverage in a Northern Everglades Impoundment
    Air Photointerpretation and Satellite Imagery Analysis Techniques for Mapping Cattail Coverage in a Northern Everglades Impoundment Ken Rutchey and Les Vilchek Abstract 20 wetland categories using ERDAS software. The thematic ac- Color-infrared aerial photography taken in 1991 and 1995, curacy of this 20-wetland-class image, determined by analyz- and SPOT satellite imagery taken in 1991, were utilized to ing 241 stratified random ground reference points located create cattail coverage maps for Water Conservation Area 2A using global positioning system (GPS)instruments, was 70.9 (WCAZA), an impounded portion of the remnant Everglades. percent. A final consolidation of these 20 classes to form a Cattail stands were delineated and classified using conven- 12-class image gave an overall accuracy of 80.9 percent tional air photointerpretation and digital image processing (Rutchey and Vilchek, 1994). techniques, respectively. Four interacting confounding factors The methods used in the Rutchey and Vilchek (1994) (i.e., water depth/color, impacts from fire, periphyton species study were chosen because (1)there was a need to assess the composition, and growth morphology within a single species) utility of satellite imagery for mapping Everglades wetlands; are implicated as possible elements that complicated vegeta- (2) the equipment (both software and hardware) were avail- tion classification. Photointerpretation techniques showed an able; (3) it was more economical than using photointerpre- increasing trend in cattail encroachment from 421.6 hectares tation; and (4) the results could be digitally reproduced. of monotypic cattail in 1991 to 1646.3 hectares in 1995. A Overall, the accuracy results were modest for this type of 1991 SPOT classified image appears to have overestimated digital classification.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Land Mapping from Remotely Sensed Data
    M. J. JACKSON* Planning lntelligence Directorate (3) Department of the Environment London, England P. CARTER lmage Analysis Group, MPD Hanoell, Oxfordshire OX11 ORA, England T. I?. SMITH Planning Intelligence Directorate (3) Department of the Environment London, England W. G. GARDNER lmage Analysis Group, MPD Hanoell, Oxfordshire OX11 ORA, England Urban Land Mapping from Remotely Sensed Data Results suggest that the Landsat resolution is compatible with the requirement to map developed areas of 5 hectares or larger. INTRODUCTION use to which land is put in the United King- dom (UK) has not been available. Claims HE DEPARTMENT of the Environment have been made by some environmentalists T(DOE) is concerned with collecting in- that land is being destroyed by urban devel- formation on both the extent and distribution opment at an alarming rate. While the lim- ABSTRACT:All developed areas, offive hectares or above, in England and Wales were mapped using aerial photography flown in 1969. The Department of the Environment is now undertaking research and development with the Image Analysis Group, Harwell to enable the monitoring of urban growth from this base year by Landsat imagery. It is necessary, therefore, that the automated classification of urban growth from Landsat data be comparable to the aerial survey. To ensure this comparability it is necessary to quantify the differences in the classification systems and to emphasize the use of ground verification procedures. Present indications are that the Landsat resolution is compatible with the DOE'S basic requirement to map developed areas of ouer five hectares, though the capability to monitor change with the high level of accuracy required has not yet been established.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Geology Field Manual
    Chapter 15 REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUES Introduction This chapter briefly summarizes the capabilities, limitations, and requirements of typical remote sensing techniques. Depending on the nature of the data and the objective of the study, geologic interpretation of remotely sensed data may be simple or complicated. Remote sensing is a tool that makes some tasks easier, makes possible some tasks that would otherwise be impossible, but is inappropriate for some tasks. Depending on the individual situation, remote sensing may be extremely valuable. Some remote sensing interpretations can stand on their own with confidence, but for most, establishing ground truth is essential. Imaging Systems There are three main types of imaging systems, two of which are widely used in terrestrial applications: Photographic.—Cameras and film are used. Photography provides the best spatial resolution but less flexibility in spectral data collection and image enhancement. Spatial resolution is dependent on alti- tude, focal length of lenses, and the types of film used. Spectral resolution is limited to visible and near infrared wavelengths. Electronic Spectral Sensors.— Detectors are used, usually scanners, that may have less spatial resolution than photographs but can gather spectral data over wide spectral ranges that enable a wide variety of imaging processing, mineral, and geologic identification. These remote sensing systems include satellites, such as Landsat, airborne sensors carried on aircraft, and FIELD MANUAL spectrometers carried on the ground. This type of remote sensing has several categories, including multi- spectral, hyperspectral, and imaging spectroscopy. Vidicon. – A television-type system. Vidicon systems generally are inferior to other types both spatially and spectrally. They are used mostly on space probes because of operational constraints.
    [Show full text]