DOCSLIB.ORG

Guidelines for Urban Forest Restoration 2 Guidelines for Urban Forest Restoration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

GUIDELINES FOR URBAN FOREST RESTORATION 2 GUIDELINES FOR URBAN FOREST RESTORATION NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION http://www.nyc.gov/parks Acknowledgements: These guidelines were written over several years, based on decades of work by NYC Parks Natural Resources Group. Many people contributed who have not been listed below, and we acknowledge and appreciate everyone who took time to make this document more complete, accurate, and helpful to future restoration practitioners. The primary authors of this document at Parks were: Katerli Bounds, Michael J. Feller, Jennifer Greenfeld, Minona Heaviland, Clara Pregitzer and Tim Wenskus. Signifi cant written sections, review, and comments were also received from: Bram Gunther, Lea Johnson, Kristen King, Jacqueline Lu, Marjorie Naidich, Ellen Pehek, Brady Simmons, Susan Stanley and Ed Toth. External reviewers also contributed comments and notes that help to improve the fi nal document: Dennis Burton, Sarah Charlop-Powers, Richard Hallett, John Jordan, David Maddox and Josephine Scalia. We thank Commissioners Veronica M. White, Adrian Benepe, Liam Kavanagh, Joshua Laird, Fiona Watt, and Director Bill Tai for their vision and support. Consulting Team: Design + Planning Andrew Lavallee, Managing Principal, NYC Studio Gonzalo Cruz, Creative Design Director, NYC Studio Grace Miller, Designer, NYC Studio The consulting team would like to thank the following individuals whose participation was key to the develpment of this document: Hannah Beall, Jeremiah Bergstrom, Ellen Fyock, Caitrin Higgins, John Hunter, Lea Johnson, Renee Kaufman, Emily Neye, Shaun O’Rourke, Matt Palmer, Richard Pouyat, Thomas Salaki, Timothy Terway, Donna Walcavage, Adrianne Weremchuk and Evelyn Zornoza. Printed in the United States by Vanguard Direct. Printed on Cascades Rolland Recycled stock: Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certifi ed, 30% post- consumer and FSC mixed paper, manufactured using biogas energy and certifi ed EcoLogo. Tabs Printed on Cascades Rolland Recycled stock: Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certifi ed, 30% post-consumer and FSC mixed paper, manufactured using biogas energy and certifi ed EcoLogo 3 New York City Tree Canopy Map, 2010 GIS data 4 GUIDELINES FOR URBAN FOREST RESTORATION PART 1 BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT PART 3 BUILDING THE FOREST Chapter 1: Forest Restoration in New York City Chapter 5: Site Preparation 1. Introduction 9 1. Site Protection 84 2. Why Restore Urban Forests? 10 2. Invasive Plant Management 85 3. The History of NRG and Forest Management in New York City 12 3. Site Clearing 99 4. Case Study: Long-Term Forest Restoration at Alley Pond Park 18 4. Soil Preparation 100 5. Soil Placement and Amendments 102 Chapter 2: The Urban Forest: Restoring Structure and Ecosystem 6. CASE STUDY: Site Preparation Challenges in Rodman’s 104 Function to Natural Areas Neck North in Pelham Bay Park 1. Vertical Diversity: Multi-Storied Forest Structure and Its Function 24 2. Horizontal Diversity and Landscape Ecology 27 Chapter 6: Planting, Establishment, and Adaptive Management 3. Forests in New York City 30 1. Scheduling 107 4. Ecosystem Stability 34 2. Procuring 108 5. Challenges to Natural Forest Succession in Urban Ecosystems 35 3. Protecting 112 6. Case Study: Restoration Lessons from the Urban Forest and 37 4. Managing 114 Education Program (UFEP) 5. Adaptive Management and Research 116 6. Case Study: Incorporating Research into Reforestation 126 PART 2 PLANNING THE WORK Efforts at Givans Creek Woods Chapter 3: Site Inventory, Assessment, and Selection 1. Establish Goals 44 APPENDIX 2. Review Opportunities and Constraints 45 1. Regulations 133 3. Assess Sites in the Field 51 2. Common Forest Communities of New York 135 4. Evaluate and Prioritize Sites 56 City and Surroundings 5. Case Study: Assessing Sites: Opportunities vs. Constraints 58 3. Techniques for Control of Invasive Plants 142 4. MillionTreesNYC Sapling Mortality Datasheet 145 Chapter 4: Site Planning and Design 5. Web References 146 1. Goals and Objectives 63 6. References 148 2. Restoration Planning Considerations 64 3. Designing the Forest 66 4. Establishment and Adaptive Management 74 5. Case Study: PlaNYC Reforestation at Kissena Corridor Park 75 5 LIST OF FIGURES Chapter 1: Forest Restoration in New York City Chapter 5: Site Preparation Fig 1.1: Vegetation Types in Van Cortlandt Park, 1988 Fig 5.1: Site Preparation Time Needed to Control Invasive Plants Fig 1.2: Forever Wild Nature Preserves of New York City, 2007 Fig 5.2: Illustration of Methods to Control Invasive Trees Fig 5.3: Illustration of Methods to Control Invasive Shrubs Chapter 2: The Urban Forest: Restoring Structure and Ecosystem Fig 5.4: Illustration of Methods to Control Phragmites Function to Natural Areas Fig 5.5: Illustration of Methods to Control Herbaceous Plants Fig 2.1: Role of Restoration Principles Fig 5.6: Illustration of Methods to Control Vines Fig 2.2: Forest Structure Fig 5.7: Invasive Vegetation Treatment Calendar Fig 2.3: Forests in the Urban Matrix Fig 5.8: Illustration of Rototilling Fig 5.9: Illustration of Ripping Chapter 3: Site Inventory, Assessment, and Selection Chapter 6: Planting, Establishment, and Adaptive Management Fig 3.1: Restoration Site Selection Process Fig 6.1: Tree Planting Calendar Fig 3.2: Setting Goals at Different Spatial Scales Fig 6.2: Detail for Planting Container Trees Fig 3.3: Opportunities and Constraints Diagram Fig 6.3: Adaptive Management Cycle Fig 3.4: Review Site Constraints Diagram Fig 6.4: MillionTreesNYC Citywide Survival of Forest Restoration Trees Fig 3.5: Hutchinson River Parkway Plan Fig 6.5: Citywide Location of Mortality Plots Fig 6.6: Citywide Experimental Research Plot Design Chapter 4: Site Planning and Design Fig 6.7: Kissena Park and Willow Lake Experimental Research Plot Design Fig 4.1: Soundview Park Salt Marsh, Woodland, and Meadow Restoration Fig 6.8: Plot Design for Pelham Bay Park ULTRA-EX Research Project Fig 4.2: Elements of Restoration Site Design Fig. 6.9: Basal Area of Native Trees in Plots Fig 4.3: Administrative and Biological Timelines Fig 6.10: Tree Species Diversity in Plots Fig 4.4: Size and Packaging Choices for Plant Material Fig 6.11: Givans Creek Woods Species Planting Plot Design Fig 4.5: Estimates of Trees and Shrubs for One Acre Fig 6.12: Givans Creek Woods Soil Treatment Plot Design Fig 4.6: Visualizing 3 to 5 Foot Spacing Fig 6.13: Different Growth Rates Based on Soil Treatments Fig 4.7: Visualizing Restoration Over 25 Years Fig 6.14: Different Growth Rates and Survival by Species Fig 4.8: Site Categorization: Kissena Corridor Park Fig 4.9: Invasive Plant Removal: Kissena Corridor Park Fig 4.10: Kissena Corridor Park: Detailed Planting Year 1 Fig 4.11: Kissena Corridor Park: Detailed Planting Year 25 6 GUIDELINES FOR URBAN FOREST RESTORATION PART 1 PART 1 PART 1: BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT 7 PART ONE: BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT CHAPTER 1: Forest Restoration in New York City . 8 CHAPTER 2: The Urban Forest: Restoring Structure and Ecosystem Function to Natural Areas . 22 8 GUIDELINES FOR URBAN FOREST RESTORATION UFEP planting on Staten Island. PART 1: BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT CHAPTER 1: FOREST RESTORATION IN NYC 9 CHAPTER 1: FOREST RESTORATION IN NEW YORK CITY INTRODUCTION and ecological constraints hamstring conventional restoration practices. Over time, in the process of restoring more than 1,600 acres of natural areas, including 1,400 acres of forest, NRG has developed, borrowed, and shared new restoration Guidelines is a compendium of the theories and practices developed, implemented, techniques with a broad range of practitioners across the country. Key documents and tested during thirty years of natural area restoration by the New York City related to improving the practice of urban ecological restoration have emerged from Department of Parks & Recreation’s (NYC Parks) Natural Resources Group (NRG). this fruitful communication. Publications such as the Nature Conservancy’s Element The book includes an overview of the ecological and restoration principles behind Stewardship Abstracts, the Society of Ecological Restoration’s Management and NRG’s approach to forest restoration, as well as a step-by-step guide to building Restoration Notes, Leslie Sauer’s Once and Future Forest (1998), and an assorted sustainable urban forests. Though this information is presented through the lens of collection of conference and seminar papers have become cherished volumes in a NRG’s experience in New York City, the challenges confronting its efforts to establish slim canon of authoritative literature in the fi eld. NRG itself has published nearly 70 healthy forests here are found in most dense urban areas: a legacy of encroachment works, including articles, guides, summary reports, ecological assessments, and upon and neglect of natural areas, fragmentation, and the rampant spread of management plans. Until now, however, no single document has captured the full invasive plant species. Just as most local governments share these challenges, breadth of NRG’s forest restoration knowledge and experience. many also share New York’s commitment to creating a sustainable and ecologically robust urban environment. Forest restoration is a crucial step towards achieving that end. New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s 2007 MillionTreesNYC reforestation initiative, with its goal of planting and caring for one million trees in New York’s fi ve boroughs by 2017, brought about a tremendous and instantaneous expansion of NRG, one of the nation’s fi rst publicly funded urban natural resources conservation
Recommended publications
  • A Report on the City of New York's Existing and Possible Tree Canopy

    A Report on the City of New York's Existing and Possible Tree Canopy

    A Report on the City of New York’s Existing and Possible Tree Canopy Why is Tree Canopy Important? Project Background Tree canopy (TC) is the layer of leaves, branches, and stems of trees that The goal of the project was to apply the USDA Forest Service’s cover the ground when viewed from above. Tree canopy provides many Tree Canopy (TC) Assessment Protocols to the City of New benefits to communities by improving water quality, saving energy, lower- York. The primary source of data for this assessment was Light ing city temperatures, reducing air pollution, enhancing property values, Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data acquired from April 14th to providing wildlife habitat, facilitating social and educational opportunities May 1st, 2010. The City of New York funded LiDAR acquisition, and providing aesthetic benefits. Establishing a tree canopy goal is crucial and the National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory for communities seeking to improve their green infrastructure and environ- Council (NUCFAC) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) mental quality. A tree canopy assessment is the first step in this goal- funded subsequent tree canopy analyses. The assessment was setting process, providing estimates for the amount of tree canopy current- performed by the Spatial Analysis Laboratory (SAL) at the Uni- ly present in a city as well as the amount of tree canopy that could theo- versity of Vermont’s Rubenstein School of the Environment retically be established. and Natural Resources. The analysis was conducted in collabo- ration with the New York City Department of Parks & Recrea- How Much Tree Canopy Does New York Have? tion, the New York City Urban Field Station, the USDA Forest An analysis of New York City’s tree canopy based on land-cover data de- Service’s Northern Research Station, and Columbia University.
  • Reforestation: Likely Working on Certification, an Emerg- Nations Secretary-General’S Climate Ing Concept That Sought to Set Third Summit

    Reforestation: Likely Working on Certification, an Emerg- Nations Secretary-General’S Climate Ing Concept That Sought to Set Third Summit

    18 www.taylorguitars.com [Sustainability] arrived in Washington, D.C. in well over a decade, but in 2014 the 1993 and began my professional concept took a twist when govern- career working in environmental ments, private companies, and civil Ipolitics. Anyone involved with interna- society groups signed the New York tional forest policy in the 1990s was Declaration of Forests at the United Reforestation: likely working on certification, an emerg- Nations Secretary-General’s Climate ing concept that sought to set third Summit. The Declaration is a voluntary, from POLITICS to PLANTING party management standards for active non-legally binding pledge to halve the forestry operations. The idea was (and rate of deforestation by 2020, to end still is) that a consumer would choose a it by 2030, and to restore hundreds With Taylor embarking on reforestation efforts product that had an ecolabel over one of millions of acres of degraded land. that did not, if it assured you that the A year later, in 2015, largely due to in Cameroon and Hawaii, Scott Paul explains the product originated from a well-managed pressure from activist organizations, forest. Think Gifford Pinchot meets the literally hundreds of companies involved politics of forest restoration and why Taylor’s Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval. in the Southeast Asian palm oil trade timing might be ideal. The Forest Stewardship Council was announced some sort of new policy. born at this time, and for a decade Looking back at these two events, it’s certification overshadowed much of the fair to say that while lofty words do not global forest policy dialogue.
  • Sustaining America's Urban Trees and Forests

    Sustaining America's Urban Trees and Forests

    United States Department of SSustainingustaining AAmerica’smerica’s Agriculture Forest Service UUrbanrban TTreesrees andand ForestsForests Northern Research Station State and Private Forestry General Technical DDavidavid J.J. NNowak,owak, SusanSusan M.M. Stein,Stein, PaulaPaula B.B. Randler,Randler, EricEric J.J. GreenGreenfi eeld,ld, Report NRS-62 SSaraara JJ.. CComas,omas, MMaryary AA.. CCarr,arr, aandnd RRalphalph J.J. AligAlig June 2010 A Forests on the Edge Report ABSTRACT Nowak, David J.; Stein, Susan M.; Randler, Paula B.; Greenfi eld, Eric J.; Comas, Sara J.; Carr, Mary A.; Alig, Ralph J. 2010. Sustaining America’s urban trees and forests: a Forests on the Edge report. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-62. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 27 p. Close to 80 percent of the U.S. population lives in urban areas and depends on the essential ecological, economic, and social benefi ts provided by urban trees and forests. However, the distribution of urban tree cover and the benefi ts of urban forests vary across the United States, as do the challenges of sustaining this important resource. As urban areas expand across the country, the importance of the benefi ts that urban forests provide, as well as the challenges to their conservation and maintenance, will increase. The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of the current status and benefi ts of America’s urban forests, compare differences in urban forest canopy cover among regions, and discuss challenges facing urban forests and their implications for urban forest management. Key Words: Urban forest, urbanization, land Lisa DeJong The Plain Dealer, Photo: AP management, ecosystem services Urban forests offer aesthetic values and critical services.
  • Hanging on to the Edges Hanging on to the Edges

    Hanging on to the Edges Hanging on to the Edges

    DANIEL NETTLE Hanging on to the Edges Hanging on to the Edges Essays on Science, Society and the Academic Life D ANIEL Essays on Science, Society I love this book. I love the essays and I love the overall form. Reading these essays feels like entering into the best kind of intellectual conversati on—it makes me want and the Academic Life to write essays in reply. It makes me want to get everyone else reading it. I almost N never feel this enthusiasti c about a book. ETTLE —Rebecca Saxe, Professor of Cogniti ve Science at MIT What does it mean to be a scien� st working today; specifi cally, a scien� st whose subject ma� er is human life? Scien� sts o� en overstate their claim to certainty, sor� ng the world into categorical dis� nc� ons that obstruct rather than clarify its complexi� es. In this book Daniel Ne� le urges the reader to unpick such DANIEL NETTLE dis� nc� ons—biological versus social sciences, mind versus body, and nature versus nurture—and look instead for the for puzzles and anomalies, the points of Hanging on to the Edges connec� on and overlap. These essays, converted from o� en humorous, some� mes autobiographical blog posts, form an extended medita� on on the possibili� es and frustra� ons of the life scien� fi c. Pragma� cally arguing from the intersec� on between social and biological sciences, Ne� le reappraises the virtues of policy ini� a� ves such as Universal Basic Income and income redistribu� on, highligh� ng the traps researchers and poli� cians are liable to encounter.
  • Natural Resources Group Forest Restoration Team Planting Report Fall 2010

    Natural Resources Group Forest Restoration Team Planting Report Fall 2010

    Natural Resources Group Forest Restoration Team Planting Report Fall 2010 Dear Parkie, The Natural Resources Group (NRG) moved closer to our PlaNYC goal of planting over 400,000 trees throughout the city. This past fall we planted over 30,000 trees in 2 properties in all five boroughs. Our current tally stands at 222,188. Furthermore, we planted over 7,000 shrubs and over 4,000 herbaceous plants Our primary goal is to create and restore multi-story forests, bringing back the ecological richness of our region. Healthy multi-story forests provide cleaner air, cleaner water, and increased biodiversity. NRG again hosted the Million Trees volunteer day. Volunteers and Parks’ staff planted 21,806 trees altogether. Without volunteers and the support of the Agency, and our institutional and community partners, NRG would not reach its planting goals. Below is a summary of fall 2010. • Containerized trees planted by the Forest Restoration Team: 27,130 (2009: 26,139) • Containerized trees planted through contractors: 4,332 (2009: 9,652) • Balled & burlapped trees planted through contractors: 58 (2009: 267) • Containerized shrubs planted by the Forest Restoration Team: 5,701 (2009: 4,626) • Containerized shrubs planted through contractors: 1,492 (2009: 0) • Herbaceous plugs planted by the Forest Restoration Team: 4,540 (2009: 18,528) • Hosted 11 volunteer events with a total of 341 volunteers (2009: 32, 468) Sincerely, Tim Wenskus Deputy Director Natural Resources Group Total Plants Planted Trees 31,520 Shrubs 7,193 Herbaceous 4,540 Grand Total 43,253
  • Today Queens

    Today Queens

    QUQUQUEENSQUQUEENSQUEENSQUEENQUEENSUEENSUEENUEENSUEENUEENSEENEENEENSSS o. Volume 64, NNo.1 25084 MONDAYTHURSDAY,, JANUARY APRIL 11,7, 20120199 50¢50¢ LILIWoodside ChiefLawyers Lawyers Charged ChargedADA Man UEENS WithWithCharged Defrauding Defrauding With Q ClientsClientsResponds for for Millions Millions to FatalByBy Jonathan Jonathan Punch Sperling Sperling QueensQueens Daily Daily Eagle Eagle CriticismTheyThey were were hired hired to to practice practice the the law law in— — not not breakbreakFaces it. it. Court On ODAY Now two recently disbarred lawyers from a TODAY Now two recently disbarred lawyers from a T former Long Island law firm are facing multiple —— APRILJANUARY 11, 7,20192019 — — formerVictim’sgrand Longlarceny Island charges law andfirmBirthday aare scheme facing to multiple defraud grandNew larceny charges Report and a scheme to defraud charge for allegedlyBy David pilfering Brand more than $7 million INVESTIGATORS««« FROM THE 115TH chargefrom thefor allegedlysettlements pilfering of dozens more of than clients, $7 million Queens ««« The reportQueens Daily is Eagle the first Precinct havePARENTSINDISTRICT30ARE released the name of the gunman fromDistrict the Attorneysettlements Richard of dozens A. Brown of clients, announced Queens on believedFUMINGOVERSCHOOLBUSISSUES PARENTSINDISTRICT30AREto FLUSHINGbe responsible FIREHOUSE for the bloody DistrictThursday.Familyof Attorney several,Brown and friendsRichard was appointed of A. John Brown he “Danny” toannouncedsays the case McGee onas a Thursday.filled a row Brown inside
  • Urban Forestry Manual

    Urban Forestry Manual

    URBAN FORESTRY MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction _______________________________________________________________________________________ 2 Purpose _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 3 Objectives __________________________________________________________________________________________ 3 Definition of Terms _____________________________________________________________________________ 3-6 Standard of Care __________________________________________________________________________________ 6 Tree Care Management ________________________________________________________________________ 6-7 Tree Care Procedures _________________________________________________________________________ 8-17 Arboretum & Botanic Garden _______________________________________________________________ 17-18 Utility, Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk Repairs ________________________________________________ 19-20 New Development and Construction ______________________________________________________ 21-25 Tools and Staffing ___________________________________________________________________________ 26-27 Jurisdiction/Governing Authority __________________________________________________________ 27-29 Tree Donation Program _____________________________________________________________________ 30-31 Glendora’s Protected Trees _____________________________________________________________________ 32 List of Approved and Undesirable Trees ___________________________________________________ 33-35 FAQ’s __________________________________________________________________________________________
  • Spatial and Temporal Variability of Forest Floor Duff Characteristics in Long-Unburned Pinus Palustris Forests

    Spatial and Temporal Variability of Forest Floor Duff Characteristics in Long-Unburned Pinus Palustris Forests

    Canadian Journal of Forest Research Spatial and temporal variability of forest floor duff characteristics in long-unburned Pinus palustris forests Journal: Canadian Journal of Forest Research Manuscript ID: Draft Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the Author: n/a Complete List of Authors: Kreye, Jesse; Mississippi State University, Forestry Varner, Julian; Mississippi State University, Forestry Dugaw, Christopher;Draft Humboldt State University, Mathematics fire exclusion, fuel heterogeneity, longleaf pine, spatial autocorrelation, Keyword: wildland fuels http://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjfr-pubs Page 1 of 42 Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1 Spatial and temporal variability of forest floor duff characteristics in long-unburned Pinus 2 palustris forests 3 Jesse K. Kreye 1, J. Morgan Varner 1, Christopher J. Dugaw 2 4 5 1Address for all correspondence 6 Forest & Wildlife Research Center 7 Department of Forestry 8 Mississippi State University 9 Box 9681 10 Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA 11 Email. [email protected] Draft 12 13 2Department of Mathematics 14 Humboldt State University 15 1 Harpst Street 16 Arcata, CA 95521 USA 17 18 Suggested Running Head: Variability in forest floor duff 19 1 http://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjfr-pubs Canadian Journal of Forest Research Page 2 of 42 20 Abstract 21 Duff fires (smoldering in fermentation and humus forest floor horizons) and their consequences 22 have been documented in fire-excluded ecosystems but with little attention to their underlying 23 drivers. Duff characteristics influence the ignition and spread of smoldering fires and their spatial 24 patterns on the forest floor may be an important link to the heterogeneity of consumption 25 observed following fires.
  • Water Quality Featuring Brett Branco (BB) Hosted by Helen Cheng

    Water Quality Featuring Brett Branco (BB) Hosted by Helen Cheng

    Episode 2: Water Quality Featuring Brett Branco (BB) Hosted by Helen Cheng (HC) Air Date: May 2017 Animals need it and people too; water, water everywhere. But is its quality that we are aware? Welcome to Jamaica Bay. -Music interlude- You’re listening to Jamaica Bay, a podcast series bringing you stories of the people that work, live, and play in Jamaica Bay, New York City. I’m your host, Helen Cheng. And I’m from the Science and Resilience Institute at Jamaica Bay and New York Sea Grant. -Music interlude- Beyond the skyscrapers and the masses of people, you might not realize it at first but New York City is more than just a booming metropolis. BB: “Well, New York City is an island. Manhattan obviously and Staten Island obviously, but even Brooklyn and Queens are part of Long Island. And we’re a coastal city so we’re intimately tied to the waters.” To learn about the New York City waters and Jamaica Bay waters, I sat down with BB: “Brett Branco, I’m a professor here at Brooklyn College, also hold a joint appointment at the CUNY Graduate Center. I’m also currently the director of the Urban Sustainability Program here at Brooklyn College.” Brett does research on shallow, coastal, and inland waters. A lot of his research looks at human impacts on estuaries and coasts especially in New York City bodies like Jamaica Bay. In particular, he’s looking at the water quality of Jamaica Bay. HC: “What is water quality and why is it important?” BB: “Yea, that’s sort of people’s favorite questions to me.
  • National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 2000

    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 2000

    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 2000 Floyd Bennett Field Gateway NRA - Jamaica Bay Unit Table of Contents Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Concurrence Status Geographic Information and Location Map Management Information National Register Information Chronology & Physical History Analysis & Evaluation of Integrity Condition Treatment Bibliography & Supplemental Information Floyd Bennett Field Gateway NRA - Jamaica Bay Unit Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Inventory Summary The Cultural Landscapes Inventory Overview: CLI General Information: Purpose and Goals of the CLI The Cultural Landscapes Inventory (CLI), a comprehensive inventory of all cultural landscapes in the national park system, is one of the most ambitious initiatives of the National Park Service (NPS) Park Cultural Landscapes Program. The CLI is an evaluated inventory of all landscapes having historical significance that are listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, or are otherwise managed as cultural resources through a public planning process and in which the NPS has or plans to acquire any legal interest. The CLI identifies and documents each landscape’s location, size, physical development, condition, landscape characteristics, character-defining features, as well as other valuable information useful to park management. Cultural landscapes become approved CLIs when concurrence with the findings is obtained from the park superintendent and all required data fields are entered into a national database. In addition,
  • Chapter 7 Sustainable Forest Management Alternatives for The

    Chapter 7 Sustainable Forest Management Alternatives for The

    Sustainable forest management alternatives for the carpathian mountain region... 109 Chapter 7 Sustainable Forest Management Alternatives for the Carpathian Mountain Region: Providing a Broad Array of Ecosystem Services William S. Keeton and Sarah M. Crow1 Abstract. International criteria for sustainable forest management (SFM) in temperate and boreal forests share a number of themes in common, as evidenced by similarities between the Montreal and Helsinki Processes. But translating these into meaningful implementation practices that differ from past approaches has been challenging in the Carpathian Mountain region of Eastern Europe. In this paper we explore contemporary science, emerging models, and innovative practices that offer guidance on implementing SFM criteria, with a focus on three criteria: 1) conservation of biological diversity, 2) maintenance of water resources, and 3) contribution to global carbon cycles. Particular reference is made to SFM options for the Carpathian Mountain region of Ukraine. The contribution of SFM to biodiversity conservation depends first on the establishment of fully representative reserve systems. On managed forestlands surrounding reserves, shifting stand age class distributions closer to the historic range of variability and recently developed silvicultural practices, such as disturbance based forestry, will help maintain ecological connectivity, landscape heterogeneity, and stand structural complexity. Strategically placed restoration of native species composition in areas dominated by spruce plantations will both enhance forest health and play an important role in biodiversity conservation. Conservation of aquatic resources is also significant concern in the Carpathian Mountain region. Broader use of contemporary watershed management approaches is recommended, including delineation of riparian buffers, riparian forest restoration, and ecologically informed forest road management.
  • Reforestation Forester Work Location: Ukiah, CA

    Reforestation Forester Work Location: Ukiah, CA

    Position Description Position Title: Reforestation Forester Work Location: Ukiah, CA The Mendocino Family of Companies (Mendocino Forest Products Company, Mendocino Redwood Company, Humboldt Redwood Company, Humboldt Sawmill Company, and Allweather Wood), is a leading manufacturer and distributor of environmentally certified redwood, Douglas-fir, and preservative treated lumber products throughout California and the Western U.S. Our culture is based in environmental stewardship and community support. The company maintains Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC® C013133) certification for its forestlands, manufacturing, and distribution operations. Mendocino Redwood Company, LLC (MRC) located in Ukiah, CA is seeking a Reforestation Forester to join our forestry team. This is a full-time position that involves working closely with the Forest Manager for the purpose of meeting forest stewardship and business objectives. Relocation help is available! Summary Direct responsibility for tree planting from inception to free-to-grow status, including all facets of vegetation management and materials sourcing. These activities must 1.) Comply with all applicable state and federal laws; 2.) Produce the desired rate of return on investments; 3.) Be conducted safely, and 4.) Be deployed in a manner that is consistent with the Company’s core values and consistent with the requirements of its Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification. Ensuring prompt reforestation and state certification of compliance with required stocking standards is key to achieving sustained yield harvest levels and financial objectives. Duties and Responsibilities To perform this job successfully, an individual must be able to perform each essential duty satisfactorily. The requirements listed below are representative of the knowledge, skill, and/or abilities required. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions.