DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT PANEL Minutes Meeting Held in The
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
MID MURRAY COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT PANEL Minutes Meeting held in the Council Chambers, Main Street, Cambrai Monday 29 August 2005, 10.00am 1. PRESENT IR Mann OAM (Presiding Member), DT Townsend, DJ Burgess, R Dawkins, PA Campbell, R Mead and RS Bourne (from 10.04am) 2. IN ATTENDANCE Mr KL Goldstone, Environmental Services Manager Mr JC Miller, Senior Development Officer – Planning Mr GD Parsons, Development Officer - Planning 3. COMMENCEMENT AND WELCOME 10.00AM The Presiding Member declared the meeting open and welcomed all members. 4. APOLOGIES Were received from HE Knipe and BJ Taylor. 1722/1 D Townsend moved that the apologies be received. Seconded R Mead. CARRIED. 5. CONFIRMATION OF PREVIOUS MINUTES (Page 1686 – 27/6/2005) 1722/2 P Campbell moved that the minutes of the Mid Murray Council Development Assessment Panel Meeting held on 27 June 2005 be taken as read and confirmed. Seconded D Burgess. CARRIED. 6. DEVELOPMENT REPORT 1722/3 D Burgess moved that the report be received. Seconded R Mead. CARRIED. Development Assessment Panel 1722 Minutes 29 August 2005 MID MURRAY COUNCIL 6. DEVELOPMENT REPORT CONT’D BUSINESS ARISING FROM REPORT 6.8 Development Application 711/214/05 – C Dean 10.18 AM Mr Neil & Mrs Jennifer Zimmermann, representor, addressed the Panel in relation to Development Application 711/214/05. 10.26 AM Mr & Mrs Zimmermann retired to the gallery. 10.27 AM Mr Greg Schultz, representor, addressed the Panel in relation to Development Application 711/214/05. 10.33 AM Mr Schultz retired to the gallery. 10.34 AM Mr Cleve Dean & Ms Maria Scheirich, applicants, addressed the Panel in relation to Development Application 711/214/05. 10.37 AM Mr Dean & Ms Scheirich retired to the gallery. 1723/1 P Campbell moved that pursuant to Section 33 (1)(a) of the Development Act, 1993 Provisional Development Plan Consent be refused to Development Application 711/214/05 due to the development application’s non-compliance with the following Objectives and Principles of Development Control as detailed in the Development Plan:- • Council Wide Objectives 2, 32, 33 & 34; • Rural Zone Principles of Development Control 1, 24 & 29; • Murray Plains Policy Area Objective 1. Seconded D Burgess. CARRIED. 6.9 Development Application 711/215/05 – C Dean 1723/2 P Campbell moved that pursuant to Section 33 (1)(a) of the Development Act, 1993 Provisional Development Plan Consent be refused to Development Application 711/215/05 due to the development application’s non-compliance with the following Objectives and Principles of Development Control as detailed in the Development Plan:- • Council Wide Objectives 2, 32, 33 & 34; • Rural Zone Principles of Development Control 1, 24 & 29; • Murray Plains Policy Area Objective 1. Seconded D Burgess. CARRIED. Development Assessment Panel 1723 Minutes 29 August 2005 MID MURRAY COUNCIL 6. DEVELOPMENT REPORT CONT’D 6.10 Development Applications 710/1098/97 & 711/251/00 – CA Verran 10.42 AM Ms Chris Verran, applicant, addressed the Panel in relation to Development Applications 710/1098/97 & 711/251/00. 10.46 AM Ms Verran retired to the gallery. 1724/1 R Dawkins moved that Council’s Development Assessment Panel advise Ms Verran that Council will not insist on a fresh development application being submitted to formalise works undertaken and that Ms Verran be advised to commence operations in strict accordance with the conditions attached to Development Approval 710/1098/97 and 711/251/00 by 31 December 2005. Seconded R Mead. CARRIED. 6.11 Development Application 711/129/05 – S & D Butler 10.48 AM Ms Deb Butler, applicant, addressed the Panel in relation to Development Application 711/129/05. 10.51 AM Ms Butler retired to the gallery. 1724/2 D Burgess moved that Provisional Development Plan Consent be granted to Development Application 711/129/05, subject to the following conditions and notations:- Conditions as imposed by Council a) The development shall be carried out in accordance with the details and plans submitted with the application, other than where required to be varied by the following conditions. b) The applicant is advised that no more than 100mm of topsoil is to be used on the riverbank for the purposes of creating a lawn area. c) It has been indicated by the applicant that is their intention to use sandbags to prevent further bank erosion. Should this be the cause, the applicant is advised to limit sandbagging to one layer and that it should not extend past the existing concrete wall of sleepers that protrude into the river. Development Assessment Panel 1724 Minutes 29 August 2005 MID MURRAY COUNCIL 6. DEVELOPMENT REPORT CONT’D 6.11 Development Application 711/129/05 – S & D Butler cont’d Condition as imposed by the Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation a) The applicant must not use concrete sleepers in further construction on the riverbank at this site as suggested by this application. Concrete sleepers are not a desirable method to create a landing or stabilise the bank as they reflect wave energy rather than absorb it encouraging further erosion and do not support natural bank stabilisation, which can be achieved through the establishment of native vegetation. Notations as imposed by Council a) The applicant is reminded that all conditions and notations attached to the approval issued for development application 711/338/03 remain valid. b) This approval does not imply compliance with the Electricity Trust of South Australia Act 1946 (as amended), or the Regulations thereunder. It is the responsibility of the owner and the person undertaking development to ensure compliance with the same. You are advised to contact appropriate authorities including ETSA, Telstra and SA Water in relation to the location of supply lines and other requirements prior to commencing work. c) Development Approval Required This approval refers only to Provisional Development Plan Consent. Provisional Building Rules Consent and Development Approval must be obtained prior to commencement of work. d) Consent Valid 36 Months If substantial work on the development is not commenced within twelve months of the date of this consent, or substantially completed within thirty- six months of the date of this consent, a fresh consent must be obtained. e) The Council also advises that the proposed development will be located within the “River Murray Floodplain” which is subject to periodic flooding, which may cause extensive or total loss. Neither the Council or any of its Servants, Agents or Officers accept any responsibility for any such loss which may occur. Any conditions are imposed so as to maintain the natural character of the River Valley and to attain the Objectives of the River Murray Zone. Development Assessment Panel 1725 Minutes 29 August 2005 MID MURRAY COUNCIL 6. DEVELOPMENT REPORT CONT’D 6.11 Development Application 711/129/05 – S & D Butler cont’d Notations as imposed by the Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation a) The query as to definitions relating to the development application is as follows. The Macquarie Dictionary 2003 On-line Edition defines Mooring as something by which a ship or the like is moored, as a cable, line, etc. and mooring (plural) as the place where a vessel is or may be moored. Landing on the other hand is a place where person or goods are landed, as from a ship. It also refers to architecture; a. the floor at the head or foot of a flight of stairs. b. a platform between flights of stairs. General usage for a landing in reference to the river therefore is the platform between the land and the vessel, which could be also referred to as a pier, wharf, jetty or dock. b) The applicant is advised that no more than 100mm of topsoil is to be used on the riverbank for the purposes of creating a lawn area. c) It has been indicated by the applicant that is their intention to use sandbags to prevent further bank erosion. Should this be the cause, the applicant is advised to limit sandbagging to one layer and that it should not extend past the existing concrete wall of sleepers that protrude into the river. d) The applicant is advised to consider a new product called Soft Rock if bank erosion is still an issue on the site. This product is made of a manufactured geotextile material designed to be long lasting and durable. The containers can be filled with soil or sand and covered in soil to encourage the establishment of riverbank vegetation. Soft Rock is designed to absorb wave energy as opposed to concrete blocks that reflect wave energy, making Soft Rock a better option for the health of the River Murray. Included is a copy of their brochure that I hope you will take the time to read and consider. A contact number is highlighted on the last page should you have any further questions regarding the product. e) The applicant is advised of their general duty of care to take all reasonable measures to prevent any harm to the River Murray through his or her actions or activities. Seconded R Bourne. 10.56 AM The meeting adjourned for a break. 11.08 AM The meeting resumed. Development Assessment Panel 1726 Minutes 29 August 2005 MID MURRAY COUNCIL 6. DEVELOPMENT REPORT CONT’D 6.12 Development Application 711/146/05 – Bell Design & Planning 11.08 AM Mrs Kristy Sherwood, applicant, addressed the Panel in relation to Development Application 711/146/05. 11.20 AM Mrs Sherwood retired to the gallery. Advice from Transport SA was distributed to all members. 1727/1 R Dawkins moved that the late correspondence from Transport SA be received. Seconded R Mead. CARRIED.