Annual Count & Survey of San José Trails

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Count & Survey of San José Trails TRAIL COUNT Annual Count & Survey of San José Trails With Supplemental Covid-19 Survey (Appendix A) 2020 Trail Count 2020 Trail Count 2020 was conducted under unique circumstances not previously encountered. Volunteers and staff recorded a large decrease in users at most count stations. It is anticipated this is related to the current world health pandemic, Covid-19, the Santa Clara County Shelter-In-Place Order, and the prominent wildfires throughout California and the Bay Area during the week of Trail Count 2020. Ranging between 50 (Moderate Levels) to 150 (Unhealthy Levels for Sensitive Groups), the air quality experienced by trail users during the day of Trail Count 2020 influenced how many people used the trail network. However, seeing the number of people still accessing the trails during these conditions shows the value and daily need of the San Jose Trail Network to provide opportunities for active transportation and recreation. For 2020, the annual Trail Count Survey in alignment with Trail Count Day, received 78 responses. This is low compared to prior years. This reduced amount of responses may be related to the fact that over 300 trail users completed a special survey in June 2020 related to Covid-19 and the County’s Shelter-In-Place Order (for more information, see Appendix A at the end of this report). Having only recently completed a survey within the last three months, trail users may have been less likely to respond to the Annual Trail Count Survey. The following Summary Report shares the purpose and process behind Trail Count, specific findings per trail system, and overall findings based on the San Jose Trail Network. Common themes received from survey respondents centered around the need for increased trail safety and maintenance. Data Collection with a Purpose Trail Count is an annual count and survey conducted along San José Trails. The volunteer-supported effort accomplishes four goals: 1) Document the volume of trail usage with per day and annual figures; 2) Improve trail development (planning and design) for future trails; 3) Improve operations of built trails (maintenance and event coordination); and 4) Improve capability to obtain grant funding for stronger fiscal sustainability. Trail Count was initiated in 2007 to document the impact of trail closures due to downtown’s frequent and large-scale special events. City staff, partnering with the Guadalupe River Park Conservancy and Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition, sought to show that frequent closures were disruptive to a larger number of trail users and could discourage greater use of the trail systems. Trail Count data supported engagement with the City Council’s Transportation and Environment Committee (T&E) to refine and promote a Trail Closure Process. 1 The result of this collaborative process decreased the amount of closures, required early coordination to limit impacts to users, and established protocols for early public notification of unavoidable closures. Staff continue to work carefully with the Special Events Permit Unit, Valley Water, and contractors to coordinate detours and closures early to reduce impacts to the trail user to the greatest extent possible. This annual effort to collect data can also help prioritize projects, shape policy or change the approach to design. A few years ago, San Jose reached the milestone of collecting data for 10 years. After next year’s 2021 Trail Count, staff, with the foundational support of volunteers, will have achieved 15 years of data collection. Below, are just a few noteworthy insights gained over the past 14 years: • Gap closure projects have a significant impact (86% increase with the completion of Guadalupe River Trail’s Airport Parkway Under-Crossing); • Build trails and they will come (422% more trail users along Guadalupe River Trail as the system was paved and extended); • Highly-used trails may encourage more women to use trails (the percentage of women using trails increased from 26% in 2008 to 35.5% in 2020); • The number of people accessing the trails for health and fitness purposes has increased from 36% in 2008 to 50% in 2020); and • The rate of active transportation dropped noticeably in 2020 (The presumption is that with a major shift to "work from home" due to the County's Shelter-in- Place Order, fewer people are commuting daily to work sites). The Trail Program has been substantially funded by external grant sources. Many grant programs require documentation of project outcomes. Grant programs administered by the Bay Area Quality Management District and State Programs such as the Active Transportation Program require before and after data only available through efforts like Trail Count. With over $40,000,000 in awarded grant funds since 2003, San Jose’s annual Trail Count continues to advance the City’s goal of fiscal sustainability. 2 50% HEALTH & FITNESS is primary reason for using San José Trails 30% for Recreation 13% for Active Transportation* 7% Other *Active Transportation percentages may be lower than normal due to the large increase of employees working from home, arising from the County’s Shelter-In-Place Order. 3 Data Collection Method Volunteers used the following tools: • Count Sheet: The count sheet records usage in 15-minute increments. The sheet provides space to identify pedestrians, bicyclists and other users (equestrian, electric scooters, etc.). Volunteers are asked to record unusual conditions (special event traffic, large groups such as high school track teams, etc.). Count sheets use graphics to reinforce and clarify the definition of bicyclists (unicycles included) and pedestrians (wheelchairs and Segways included, as defined by California State Law). • Survey Card: Not used due to current situation surrounding Covid-19. • Social Media Engagement: For 2020, in response to Covid-19, staff and volunteers did not distribute hard copy survey cards, but rather promoted the survey through social media outlets and email engagement to volunteers, partners, advocates, and users accessing the trails on the day of Trail Count. The survey deadline was extended until Thursday, September 24. • Instructions: Emails are sent to all volunteers providing instructions on how to complete and return the count data. Options for submitting the data included email and text message. Due to precautions around Covid-19, in-person delivery was not included as an option this year. For 2020, all count sheets were photographed and sent via text message or email to the Trail Analyst. All count sheets were gathered and documented by Wednesday, September 16. • Support: The Trail Manager, Senior Analyst and Volunteer Program Manager visited all sites throughout the day to respond to questions, and to encourage and thank the volunteers. Trail Count volunteers bearing with a strange weather day. Los Gatos Creek Trail pictured left and Guadalupe River Trail pictured right. 4 Date Selection and Count Periods San José Trail Program staff have consistently conducted counts in mid- September as recommended by the National Pedestrian and Bicycle Documentation project (NPBD). This time of the year is desirable for counts for the following reasons: 1. School is in session; 2. Weather is mild with rain unlikely; 3. Daylight hours extend past 6:00 pm; and 4. Several State grants are due in the fall making data collection timely. The NPBD recommends a one-day count and suggests it occur between September 9 and 15. San José’s Trail Count 2020 occurred on Wednesday, September 9. San José’s Trail Count has occurred on Wednesdays in September since its initiation in 2007. In 2020, the fourteenth annual Trail Count included eleven count stations: • Seven stations were monitored for a 12-hour count period from 7:00 am to 7:00 pm (This 12-hour period is recommended by the NPBD); • One station was monitored for eight hours (Three Creeks Trail at Willow Street); and • Three count stations were monitored during morning peak hours (7:00 am to 9:00 am) and evening peak hours (4:00 pm to 7:00 pm) due to limited resources and anticipated low volumes of below 200 counts (Coyote Creek Trail at Stonegate Park, Los Gatos Creek Trail at Auzerais Avenue, and Thompson Creek Trail near Tully Road). Sustaining stations for over a decade has created a robust data set that offers Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Services (PRNS) Planners unique insights and guidance for improving projects and has made San José well-recognized as a resource for pedestrian and bicycle data. Over the years, the Trail Count data set has been shared with agencies to support research: • University of Texas - Dallas • Rails to Trails Conservancy • Metropolitan Transportation Commission Count Stations Ideally, the City would establish count stations across the entire Trail Network, but limited staff time, volunteers and resources focus data collection on a limited number of sites. Staff has sustained count stations along the Guadalupe River Trail since the first Trail Count in 2007. This trail system is one of the largest systems in the Network, extending from downtown through Silicon Valley, and is 5 defined as a Core Trail in the Network (i.e. a primary, long-distance route that extends past varied land uses). Over time, staff has added additional count stations. In 2008, staff added the two stations along Los Gatos Creek Trail and in 2012, the count station at Los Alamitos was incorporated into the annual tradition. Additional short-term or permanent stations have also been added throughout the years. The strategy for adding short-term or permanent stations has been: • Document popular regional systems (Guadalupe River Trail, Los Gatos Creek Trail, Coyote Creek Trail, and Los Alamitos Creek Trail); • Document the value and impact of upcoming trail extensions (Coyote Creek Trail, Los Gatos Creek Trail at Auzerais Avenue, Thompson Creek Trail, and Three Creeks Trail); • Obtain data needed to submit compelling grant applications to fund the design and construction of projects; and • Support community groups that wish to advocate for trail development or operational changes (Five Wounds Trail and Communications Hill Trail).
Recommended publications
  • Senate Bill No. 739 Passed the Senate July 22, 2001 Secretary Of
    Senate Bill No. 739 Passed the Senate July 22, 2001 Secretary of the Senate Passed the Assembly July 16, 2001 Chief Clerk of the Assembly This bill was received by the Governor this day of , 2001, at o’clock M. Private Secretary of the Governor SB 739 — 2 — CHAPTER An act making appropriations for the support of the government of the State of California and for several public purposes in accordance with the provisions of Section 12 of Article IV of the Constitution of the State of California, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST SB 739, Peace. 2001–02 Budget. This bill would make appropriations for support of state government for the 2001–02 fiscal year. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an ur- gency statute. Appropriation: yes. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: SECTION 1.00. This act shall be known and may be cited as the ‘‘Budget Act of 2001.’’ SEC. 1.50. (a) In accordance with Section 13338 of the Govern- ment Code, as added by Chapter 1284, Statutes of 1978, and as amended by Chapter 1286, Statutes of 1984, it is the intent of the Leg- islature that this act utilize a coding scheme compatible with the Gov- ernor’s Budget and the records of the State Controller, and provide for the appropriation of federal funds received by the state and deposited in the State Treasury. (b) Essentially, the format and style are as follows: (1) Appropriation item numbers have a code which is common to all the state’s fiscal systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Cunningham Park Regional Park 8 4 183.25 Alum Rock Park 15350 Penitencia Creek Rd
    Developed Council Park Area (in Name Address Park Type District District acres) Lake Cunningham Park Regional Park 8 4 183.25 Alum Rock Park 15350 Penitencia Creek Rd. Regional Park 4 6 77.5 Kelley Park Regional Park 7 7 47.44 Kelley Park - Happy Hollow Park and Zoo Regional Park 7 7 41.57 Penitencia Creek Park Neighborhood Park 4 8 36.65 Emma Prusch Farm Park Regional Park 5 6 36.41 Cataldi Park Neighborhood Park 4 8 33.97 Overfelt Gardens Regional Park 5 6 32.04 Almaden Lake Park 6099 Winfield Blvd Regional Park 10 1 30.4 Guadalupe Gardens Regional Park 3 5 27.23 Watson Park Neighborhood Park 3 5 22.32 Municipal Baseball Stadium Sports Facility 7 7 19.22 Edenvale Garden Park Regional Park 2 2 18.76 Jeffery Fontana Park Neighborhood Park 10 1 18.05 T.J. Martin Park Neighborhood Park 10 1 15.75 Calabazas Park Neighborhood Park 1 3 15.12 Arcadia Ballpark Regional Park 8 4 15.08 P.A.L. Stadium Park Sports Facility 5 6 14.28 Hillview Park Neighborhood Park 5 6 14.04 Willow Street Frank Bramhall Park Neighborhood Park 6 3 13.63 Roosevelt Park Neighborhood Park 3 5 13.62 Flickinger Park Neighborhood Park 4 8 13.53 La Colina Park Neighborhood Park 2 1 12.58 Houge Park Neighborhood Park 9 3 12.22 Evergreen Park Neighborhood Park 8 4 12.1 Capitol Park Neighborhood Park 5 6 11.91 Los Paseos Park Neighborhood Park 2 1 11.8 Fowler Creek Park Neighborhood Park 8 4 11.68 Great Oaks Park Neighborhood Park 2 2 11.54 Groesbeck Hill Park Neighborhood Park 8 4 11.46 John Mise Park Neighborhood Park 1 3 11.45 Backesto Park 13th Street and Empire Street
    [Show full text]
  • Online Feedback Form Results
    San José Diridon Station Area Online Feedback Form Summary Total Responses: 693 Raimi + Associates October 2, 2018 Table of Contents Housing/Displacement ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Q1 General Principles .................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Q2 Development of the Diridon Station Area: .............................................................................................................................. 4 Q3 Citywide Impacts and Benefits New resources generated by Google and other companies/developers go to: ....................... 5 Jobs/Education .................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Q5 General Principles .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Q6 Development of the Diridon Station Area: .............................................................................................................................. 7 Q7 Citywide Impacts and Benefits ................................................................................................................................................ 8 Land
    [Show full text]
  • Panoche Valley
    THE Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society Established 1926 AVOCET The Newsletter of the Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society September-October 2017 Panoche Valley: Saving an Important Bird Area (IBA) by Shani Kleinhaus, Environmental Advocate oncluding almost eight years of advocacy and litiga- tion, SCVAS, Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter, and Defenders of Wildlife have signed a settlement agree- Cment that allows a photovoltaic solar farm to be built on about 1,000 acres of Panoche Valley floor, while at the same time preserving 26,000 acres, including 4,000 acres of valley floor grasslands, as habitat for endangered species. Califor- nia Department of Fish and Wildlife and Con Edison have also signed the agreement. We are proud of this achievement! Monterey Audubon Society first alerted SCVAS to the plans to construct a solar farm in Panoche Valley. In 2009, plans for solar arrays and supportive infrastructure encompassed most of the valley floor, as well as Little Panoche Valley. No mitigation was offered for the inevitable loss of habitat for the many endangered species that call the valley home, so we started mobilizing. In early 2010 we organized a work- shop that formed an alliance of farmers and environmental organizations in opposition to the project. This alliance has never faltered. In the years that followed, our advocacy and permit require- ments by state and federal wildlife agencies resulted in changing project ownership as investors came and went. The project footprint shrunk and mitigation lands were added. San Benito County produced additional environmental re- view documents, asserting repeatedly that the construction of a solar project on thousands of acres of valley floor could Ferruginous Hawk by Debra Shearwater cont’d on page 4 Wednesday, September 20, 2017 Cuba - The Isle of Endemics: Birds and Bats! with Dave Johnston Wednesday, October 18, 2017 Understanding California's Whales with Ted Cheeseman The Avocet 1 Please carpool if possible; bring binoculars, field guides, layered September-October Field Trips clothing.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace, Trees, and Good Governance
    The Newsletter of the Santa Clara Audubon Society January - February 2005 Peace, trees, and good governance Young Audubon Nobel Prize winner also started have to acknowledge over time, Green Belt Movement in Kenya but which greatly complicates whale-watching our mission of conservation . by Craig Breon Must we get rid of the despotic trips Jan. 22 The Associated Press headlined its article "First African government of Myanmar (for­ -Page4 Woman Awarded Nobel Prize" but quickly went on to note that merly Burma) to preserve the Kenyan Wangari Maathai , 64, is also the first environmentalist great forests of the earth? Must to receive the honor. we transfer huge amounts of Maathai founded the Green Belt Movement , ostensibly to wealth from the United States and Europe to countries such as teach the women of Kenya that planting trees was essential to India and Brazil in order to mount a serious effort against global their long-term livelihood and the health of the land around climate change? Will fighting for the right to unionize in China them (of course, those two are one and the same). In this goal or at Wal-Mart bring us closer to the sustainable use of natural she has no doubt been a huge success, with more than 30 million resources? Will the war in Iraq mean fewer birds along the trees planted and her ideas spread to surrounding countries. Pacific Flyway? I believe I could make a credible argument that However, perhaps more important has been her integrated the answer to each of the questions above is "Yes ." approach to the strands of social progress .
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Benefits of San Jose Parks
    Guadalupe River Trail City of San José The Economic Benefits of the Park & Recreation System in San José, California February 17, 2016 The Trust for Public Land: How we do it PLAN Identify the most important land for conservation FUND Help enact measures for public funding PROTECT Acquire and protect land CREATE Create innovative parks EDUCATE Produce analyses, research, tools, and reports Local Economic Benefits • Benefits accrue to ‒ Local government(s) ‒ Residents ‒ Local businesses Enhanced Property Value P ?E"(F&$O"1(>&;%"7(23( <$2<"$10"7(;2G&1":(5"&$(&( <&$O(2$(1$&0;(&$"(3$"N%"51;'( E0KE"$(1E&5(1E27"(23( G2F<&$&#;"(<$2<"$10"7( ;2G&1":(";7"UE"$"V( P B5(05G$"&7"(05(<$2<"$1'( >&;%"7(K"5"$&;;'($"7%;17(05( 05G$"&7":(<$2<"$1'(1&W( $">"5%"7V Enhanced Property Value P @$"7"$>05K(2<"5(7<&G"( K"5"$&;;'(05G$"&7"7( 5"0KE#2$05K( E2F"(>&;%"7+( #%1(1E"(>&;%"7(>&$'V(( P ?E"(F&K501%:"(23(1E"( 0F<&G1(E&7(#""5(7E2U5(12( #"(%<(12(,-X(32$(<&$O7(&5:( )YX(32$(1$&0;7V P Z"(%7"([X P DF<&G1(E&7(#""5(F"&7%$":( %<(12(,+---(3""1(3$2F(&( <&$O(2$(1$&0; P Z"(%7"([--(3""1 Enhanced Property Value P B::01025&;(&77"77":( >&;%"(:%"(12(<&$O7\(((((((( !"#$%&&%'( P B::01025&;(<$2<"$1'(1&W( $">"5%"(:%"(12(<&$O7\( !")*"#+%&&%'(#,((-,&&. Reducing Stormwater P @&$O7(&5:(1$&0;7(G&5( $":%G"(1E"(G2717(23( 712$FU&1"$(F&5&K"F"51( #'(G&<1%$05K(<$"G0<01&1025( FLICKR/DONJD2 &5:]2$(7;2U05K(017($%5233V R H50>"$701'(23(/&;032$50&+( I&>07(F2:";(G&;G%;&1"7( 1E"(>2;%F"(23(U&1"$( $"1&05":(#'(<&$O7(&5:( 1$&0;7V R M710F&1"(1E"(G271(23( 1$"&105K(1E&1(>2;%F"(23( U&1"$V Reducing Stormwater P
    [Show full text]
  • Field Notes Eastern Vagrants in for the Park
    SP (HA), one of only a handful of records Field Notes Eastern vagrants in for the park. Returning nesters included (April-May 2016) an Olive-sided Flycatcher at Loma Prieta May follow a Little on 16 Apr (SMi) and a Western Wood- by Pete Dunten Pewee at Twin Creeks south of Almaden Geese through Phalaropes Stint in April! Reservoir on 15 Apr (JPa). Depending The four Greater White-fronted Geese study of the hundreds of peeps in the upon how one feels about difficult spending the winter near the Palo Alto impoundment between Alviso salt pond identification problems, this spring was Golf Course were last seen on 4 Apr A12 and the railroad tracks. First noted either fantastic or a nightmare, with (WGB). Three singles were with Canada on 20 Apr (WBr) and identified on 21 Apr four migrant Empidonax species found. Geese in May, one near the bay on 3 May (MI), the Stint stayed through 4 May (m. Transients passing through on their (MSh), one at Anderson Reservoir on 13 ob.) and may well have spent the winter way north included Willow Flycatcher, May (SCR), and one outside San Martin in in the south bay. The Stint drew many Hammond’s Flycatcher, and two species Coyote Valley on 19 May (MP). Cackling admirers, and the extensive coverage rare this far west, Dusky Flycatcher Geese were last seen in April, when of the peeps yielded a flagged Western and Gray Flycatcher. Single Willow groups of four were at Byxbee Park on Sandpiper on 26 Apr that had been Flycatchers, typically the latest flycatcher the 4th (MDo) and at Lake Cunningham banded near Panama City, Panama on 28 to pass through in the spring, were found on the 10th (BH, BSw), and a lone bird Jan, 2014 (PDu).
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Air Quality Conformity Analysis for the Amended Plan Bay
    The Final Transportation-Air Quality Conformity Analysis for the Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 and the 2021 Transportation Improvement Program February 2021 Bay Area Metro Center 375 Beale Street San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 778-6700 phone [email protected] e-mail www.mtc.ca.gov web Project Staff Matt Maloney Acting Director, Planning Therese Trivedi Assistant Director Harold Brazil Senior Planner, Project Manager 2021 Transportation Improvement Program Conformity Analysis Page | i Table of Contents I. Summary of Conformity Analysis ...................................................................................................... 1 II. Transportation Control Measures .................................................................................................... 7 History of Transportation Control Measures .............................................................................. 7 Status of Transportation Control Measures................................................................................ 9 III. Response to Public Comments ...................................................................................................... 12 IV. Conformity Findings ...................................................................................................................... 13 Appendix A. List of Projects in the 2021 Transportation Improvement Program Appendix B. List of Projects in Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 2021 Transportation Improvement Program Conformity Analysis Page | ii I. Summary of Conformity Analysis The
    [Show full text]
  • Audubon at Home
    The Newsletter of the Santa Clara Audubon Society May-June 2004 Audubon at home wanted to plant native and Annual Potluck Youryard is an importantbird habitat- Mediterranean plants to landscapeand maintainit accordingly minimize water use. They did Dinner June 9 great for the first few years, -all members by Nancy Teater but were soon shaded out by welcome! -Page4 Many yards in the Bay Area are landscaped using the "one of my large California Live Oak, these and one of those" plan. Since most things grow well here, redwood tree, and my those cute little bushes and trees that were planted a few years neighbor's Deodora and Incense Cedars. The natives are now ago may now be a hodgepodge that is difficult to maintain and on their last gasp because they don't get enough sun. Only the not particularly attractive. If this describes your yard and Western Sword Fern flourishes; I have replaced the others with you're thinking of making some changes, you can find many plants more suitable for shade. However, with the oak and resources to help you create a healthy yard that is safe for people redwood, I do have some nice habitat. My birding yard list and pets and attractive to birds and other wildlife. includes resident Bewick's Wren, Oak Titmouse, Chestnut­ One such resource is a new section of National Audubon backed Chickadee, House Finch, California Towhee, Anna's Society's website called "Audubon At Home" Hummingbird, and Western Scrub-Jay as well as visiting <www.audubon .org/bird/at_home/ >. Audubon suggests what Nuttall' s Woodpecker, Cedar Waxwing, Black Phoebe, Lesser I'll call the "more and less" approach: more bird feeding, native and American Goldfinch, White-crowned Sparrow, and Hermit plants, water features, and nest sites; less invasive plants, turf Thrush.
    [Show full text]
  • Trail Count 2019 Summary Report
    TRAIL COUNT 2019 Annual Count & Survey of San José Trails Trail Count 2019 Trail Count is an annual count and survey conducted along San José Trails. The volunteer-supported effort accomplishes four goals; 1) document the volume of trail usage with per day and annual figures 2) improve trail development (planning and design) 3) improve operations (maintenance and event coordination) 4) improve capability to obtain grant funding This regular effort to collect data can help prioritize projects, shape policy or change the approach to design. Two years ago, staff reviewed a decade of data as the network grew by about 25 miles. • Gap closure projects have a significant impact (86% increase with completion Guadalupe River Trail’s Airport Parkway Under-Crossing). • Build trails and they will come (422% more trail users along Guadalupe River Trail as the system was paved and extended). • Highly-used trails may encourage more women to use trails (the percentage of women using trails increased from 25% to 44%). • More trails mean more fun (46% reported fun as a primary motivator in 2007, this climbed to 70% in 2015). Trail Count was initiated in 2007 to document the impact of trail closures due to downtown’s frequent and large-scale special events. City staff, partnering with the Guadalupe River Park Conservancy and Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition, were seeking to show that frequent closures were disruptive to a larger number of trail users and could discourage greater usage of trail systems. The data supported engagement with the City Council’s Transportation and Environment Committee (T&E) to refine and promote a Trail Closure Process to limit future closures, require early coordination to limit impacts to users, and establish protocols for early public notification of unavoidable closures.
    [Show full text]
  • San Jose Edinburgh Roam Halifax 26 Toronto 28 Edinburgh 30 Photo: Siliconvalleystock/Alamy Photo
    KEEP ME! WESTJETMAGAZINE.COM | JUNE • JUIN 2018 GARDEZ-MOI! ARTICLES DE FOND EN FRANÇAIS PARIS YOUR BEGINNER’S Je GUIDE TO THE CITY T'aime OF LIGHTS ON THE A JOURNEY POWWOW TRAIL IN TIME FOLLOWING THE DISCOVERING HEARTBEAT OF IRELAND’S MOTHER EARTH ETERNAL ARAN ISLANDS CALGARY HALIFAX SAN JOSE EDINBURGH ROAM HALIFAX 26 TORONTO 28 EDINBURGH 30 PHOTO: SILICONVALLEYSTOCK/ALAMY PHOTO: 3 DAYS IN he San Jose area is known for being home to some of the world’s biggest Internet and tech companies—including Google, Apple, Facebook SAN JOSE and Intel. As the capital of Silicon Valley, San Jose CALIFORNIA is one of the wealthiest cities in the United States Tand the largest in the San Francsico Bay region. However, its This Silicon Valley city is not just a tech hub, appeal extends beyond technology, with fine food and wine, it’s also a vibrant place to play. scenic mountain hikes, and a young, multicultural population bringing international energy to both work and play. WESTJET.COM | JUNE 2018 23 ROAM 3 D AY S I N DAY 1 Morning Fuel up for the day with a breakfast bur- rito at downtown’s Cafe Rosalena. Then, tour a few of the tech giants: explore Apple’s headquarters via augmented reality at the new Apple Park Visitor 1 Center (1) in Cupertino, or take selfies in the colourful Android sculpture garden at Googleplex. DAY 2 Afternoon Back down- town, swing by Good Karma Morning Journey 45 min- producer in the Santa Cruz Artisan Ales & Cafe for utes outside San Jose to Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Coyote Valley Agriculture Feasibility Study
    CONSERVING COYOTE VALLEY AGRICULTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY PHASE ONE REPORT Sustainable Agriculture Education (SAGE) March 2012 Page 2 Contents Acknowledgements............................................................................................................................3 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................5 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................7 Background........................................................................................................................................... 7 Project Inspiration, Purpose and Phasing ............................................................................................ 7 Components of Phase One Feasibility Study ........................................................................................ 8 Overview of Existing Conditions .........................................................................................................9 Current Land Uses ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Location and Regional Context ............................................................................................................ 9 Acreage, Parcelization and Major Land Uses ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]