Cotoneaster Franchetii Bois, 1902

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Cotoneaster franchetii Bois, 1902 Identifiants : 9616/cotfra Association du Potager de mes/nos Rêves (https://lepotager-demesreves.fr) Fiche réalisée par Patrick Le Ménahèze Dernière modification le 28/09/2021 Classification phylogénétique : Clade : Angiospermes ; Clade : Dicotylédones vraies ; Clade : Rosidées ; Clade : Fabidées ; Ordre : Rosales ; Famille : Rosaceae ; Classification/taxinomie traditionnelle : Règne : Plantae ; Sous-règne : Tracheobionta ; Division : Magnoliophyta ; Classe : Magnoliopsida ; Ordre : Rosales ; Famille : Rosaceae ; Genre : Cotoneaster ; Synonymes : Cotoneaster wardii hort, p.p. 618 ; Nom(s) anglais, local(aux) et/ou international(aux) : Orange cotoneaster ; Note comestibilité : * Rapport de consommation et comestibilité/consommabilité inférée (partie(s) utilisable(s) et usage(s) alimentaire(s) correspondant(s)) : Fruit (fruits~~5(K),8,27) comestible5(K),8,27.(1*) Détails : Les fruits des cotoneasters sont comestibles, mais fades et farineux{{{8. Le fruit a une saveur douce mais il est très farineux et plein de graines 5(K). (1*)ATTENTION : toutes les autres parties des plantes du genre, comme chez toutes les rosacées, contiennent en quantités variables des composés cyanogénétiques dangereux.(1*)ATTENTION : toutes les autres parties des plantes du genre, comme chez toutes les rosacées, contiennent en quantités variables des composés cyanogénétiques dangereux{{{27(+x). Illustration(s) (photographie(s) et/ou dessin(s)): Page 1/2 Curtis´s Botanical Magazine (vol. 140 [ser. 4, vol. 10]: t. 8571, 1914) [M. Smith], via plantillustrations.org Autres infos : dont infos de "FOOD PLANTS INTERNATIONAL" : Distribution : C'est une plante tempérée. Au Yunnan{{{0(+x) (traduction automatique). Original : It is a temperate plant. In Yunnan{{{0(+x). Localisation : Asie, Australie, Chine, Tasmanie{{{0(+x) (traduction automatique). Original : Asia, Australia, China, Tasmania{{{0(+x). Liens, sources et/ou références : Wikipedia : - https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cotoneaster_franchetii (en français) ; - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cotoneaster_franchetii (source en anglais) ; 5"Plants For a Future" (en anglais) : 5https://www.pfaf.org/user/Plant.aspx?LatinName=Cotoneaster+franchetii ; dont classification : "The Plant List" (en anglais) : www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/tro-27801494 ; "GRIN" (en anglais) : https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomydetail?id=11737 ; dont livres et bases de données : 8Le régal végétal: plantes sauvages comestibles (livre page 241, par François Couplan, éditions Ellebore), 27Dictionnaire des plantes comestibles (livre, page 100, par Louis Bubenicek) ; dont biographie/références de 0"FOOD PLANTS INTERNATIONAL" : Zhang, L., et al, 2016, Ethnobotanical study of traditional edible plants used by the Naxi people during droughts. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 12:39 Page 2/2 Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org).

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Egg–Laying by the Butterfly Iphiclides Podalirius (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae) on Alien Plants: a Broadening of Host Range Or Oviposition Mistakes?
Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 29.1 (2006) 83 Egg–laying by the butterfly Iphiclides podalirius (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae) on alien plants: a broadening of host range or oviposition mistakes? C. Stefanescu, J. Jubany & J. Dantart Stefanescu, C., Jubany, J. & Dantart, J., 2006. Egg–laying by the butterfly Iphiclides podalirius (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae) on alien plants: a broadening of host range or oviposition mistake? Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 29.1: 83–90. Abstract Egg–laying by the butterfly Iphiclides podalirius (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae) on alien plants: a broadening of host range or oviposition mistakes?— Iphiclides podalirius is an oligophagous butterfly which feeds on plants of the Rosaceae family. In 2002 and 2005 in NE Spain, we recorded for the first time oviposition on two alien plant species, Cotoneaster franchetii and Spiraea cantoniensis. To ascertain if this unusual behaviour represents a broadening of host range or, alternatively, an oviposition mistake, larval performance on the new plants was investigated in the laboratory and compared with performance on the most common host plants used in the study area. Although larval performance on common hosts differed to some extent, the use of a wide range of plants of different quality at population level may in fact respond to the so-called "spreading of risk" strategy in variable environments. On the other hand, larval performance and survival to adulthood were so low on the two new hosts that our observations probably represent a case of maladaptive oviposition behaviour. This may be due to an evolutionary lag between the newly introduced plants and the insect, although other possible explanations are also taken into account.
[Show full text]
Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Lewis and Clark National Historic Park Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NCCN/NRR—2012/597 ON THE COVER Benson Beach, Cape Disappointment State Park Photograph by: Lindsey Koepke Wise Lewis and Clark National Historic Park Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NCCN/NRR—2012/597 James S. Kagan, Eric M. Nielsen, Matthew D. Noone, Jason C. van Warmerdam, and Lindsey K. Wise Oregon Biodiversity Information Center Institute for Natural Resources – Portland Portland State University P.O. Box 751 Portland, OR 97207 Gwen Kittel NatureServe 4001 Discovery Dr., Suite 2110 Boulder, CO 80303 Catharine Copass National Park Service North Coast and Cascades Network Olympic National Park 600 E. Park Avenue Port Angeles, WA 98362 December 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
[Show full text]
Cotoneaster Franchetii
Cotoneaster franchetii COMMON NAME Cotoneaster, Franchet’s Cotoneaster FAMILY Rosaceae FLORA CATEGORY Vascular – Exotic STRUCTURAL CLASS Trees & Shrubs - Dicotyledons BRIEF DESCRIPTION Widely branched shrub with arching branchlets, foliage conspicuously grey from a distance (young leaves densely hairy on both surfaces and remaining white-felted below when mature). Flowers with pink erect petals. Fruit orange with 3-5 pyrenes. HABITAT Cotoneaster franchetii. Photographer: Nic Terrestrial. Outcompetes native shrub species in a wide variety of Singers habitats. Usually dry forest and shrubland up to 300 m, forest margins, dry rangeland, bluffs, rocky sites, slips, riverbeds. FEATURES Evergreen shrub up to c. 3 m high; stems spreading and often somewhat arching; young shoots pale buff-tomentose, later becoming dark reddish brown. Leaves up to 35 x 18 mm, more or less shining and finely pilose with impressed veins above, usually with white to grey woolly tomentum (rarely pale buff) below. Flowers in clusters of 7-15 scattered along branches, Petals erect and pink. Fruit ellipsoid, oblong-obovoid, obovoid, or subglobose, 5-9 mm long, scarlet or orange scarlet. SIMILAR TAXA Cotoneaster franchetii. Photographer: Colin Has been confused with C. pannosus, but that species has flowers with Ogle spreading petals and almost always has 2 pyrenes (‘seeds’) per fruit, whereas C. franchetii has flowers with erect petals and mostly has 3 (up to 5) pyrenes per fruit. FLOWERING November, December, January FLOWER COLOURS Red/Pink LIFE CYCLE Perennial. Very long lived. Large numbers of viable seed are produced in each fruit. Fruit are readily dispersed by birds. YEAR NATURALISED 1958 ORIGIN China REASON FOR INTRODUCTION Ornamental TOLERANCES Very tolerant of damp and drought, hot and cold, salt, and a range of soils.
[Show full text]
Vascular Plants of Santa Cruz County, California
ANNOTATED CHECKLIST of the VASCULAR PLANTS of SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SECOND EDITION Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland & Maps by Ben Pease CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CHAPTER Copyright © 2013 by Dylan Neubauer All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission from the author. Design & Production by Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland Maps by Ben Pease, Pease Press Cartography (peasepress.com) Cover photos (Eschscholzia californica & Big Willow Gulch, Swanton) by Dylan Neubauer California Native Plant Society Santa Cruz County Chapter P.O. Box 1622 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 To order, please go to www.cruzcps.org For other correspondence, write to Dylan Neubauer [email protected] ISBN: 978-0-615-85493-9 Printed on recycled paper by Community Printers, Santa Cruz, CA For Tim Forsell, who appreciates the tiny ones ... Nobody sees a flower, really— it is so small— we haven’t time, and to see takes time, like to have a friend takes time. —GEORGIA O’KEEFFE CONTENTS ~ u Acknowledgments / 1 u Santa Cruz County Map / 2–3 u Introduction / 4 u Checklist Conventions / 8 u Floristic Regions Map / 12 u Checklist Format, Checklist Symbols, & Region Codes / 13 u Checklist Lycophytes / 14 Ferns / 14 Gymnosperms / 15 Nymphaeales / 16 Magnoliids / 16 Ceratophyllales / 16 Eudicots / 16 Monocots / 61 u Appendices 1. Listed Taxa / 76 2. Endemic Taxa / 78 3. Taxa Extirpated in County / 79 4. Taxa Not Currently Recognized / 80 5. Undescribed Taxa / 82 6. Most Invasive Non-native Taxa / 83 7. Rejected Taxa / 84 8. Notes / 86 u References / 152 u Index to Families & Genera / 154 u Floristic Regions Map with USGS Quad Overlay / 166 “True science teaches, above all, to doubt and be ignorant.” —MIGUEL DE UNAMUNO 1 ~ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ~ ANY THANKS TO THE GENEROUS DONORS without whom this publication would not M have been possible—and to the numerous individuals, organizations, insti- tutions, and agencies that so willingly gave of their time and expertise.
[Show full text]
Cotoneaster Franchetii Boiss.; Orange Cotoneaster Cotoneaster Lacteus W.W
A WEED REPORT from the book Weed Control in Natural Areas in the Western United States This WEED REPORT does not constitute a formal recommendation. When using herbicides always read the label, and when in doubt consult your farm advisor or county agent. This WEED REPORT is an excerpt from the book Weed Control in Natural Areas in the Western United States and is available wholesale through the UC Weed Research & Information Center (wric.ucdavis.edu) or retail through the Western Society of Weed Science (wsweedscience.org) or the California Invasive Species Council (cal-ipc.org). Cotoneaster franchetii Boiss.; orange cotoneaster Cotoneaster lacteus W.W. Smith; Parney’s cotoneaster Cotoneaster pannosus Franch.; silverleaf cotoneaster Cotoneasters Family: Rosaceae C. franchetii Range: Coastal areas of California, Oregon, and Washington. Habitat: Disturbed places, mixed evergreen forest, coastal scrub, and grassland, often near residential areas. Origin: Introduced as ornamental plants from China and escaped to become invasive in coastal regions. Impacts: On occasion, populations can become dense and crowd out native species. However, fruit likely provide a food source for some bird species. California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC) Inventory: All three species are Moderate Invasiveness C. lacteus Cotoneasters are evergreen to semi-evergreen shrubs usually C. pannosus less than 10 ft tall, but occasionally taller. All species have simple alternate leaves and distinctive orange or red berry-like fruits. The upper surfaces of the leaves are generally dull with few or no hairs. The lower surface is usually covered with woolly hairs, but can lack hairs. Flowers are white in both Parney’s and silverleaf cotoneaster, but pink to rose in orange cotoneaster.
[Show full text]
I. Lett Et Al
Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 50 (3) 2015 I. Lett et al. - Genetic diversity of CotoneasterISSN 0373-580franchetii X Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 50 (3): 377-384. 2015 NO DIFFERENCES IN GENETIC DIVERSITY OF COTONEASTER FRANCHETII (ROSACEAE) SHRUBS BETWEEN NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE RANGES IRENE LETT1*, ISABELL HENSEN2,3, HEIDI HIRSCH2,4 and DANIEL RENISON1,5 Summary: It is commonly assumed that plants have more genetic diversity in their native range than in areas where they have been introduced due to founder effects. However, few studies have proven this assumption and included the comparison between non-native and native ranges. We analyzed AFLP fingerprint patterns of 149 individuals from five native (China) and five non-native (Argentina) populations of Cotoneaster franchetii, a shrub which successfully invades different habitats and forms extensive monospecific stands. We compared genetic diversity estimates and assessed genetic differentiation among populations by inspecting FST values and conducting a PCoA, an AMOVA and a Mantel test. No evidence was found for reduced genetic diversity in non-native populations while the PCoA revealed two distinct groups, reflecting their Chinese and Argentine origin. The exceptions were ten individuals from two Chinese populations that clustered within the Argentine populations, supporting the idea of multiple introductions from China to Argentina. Key words: AFLP, Argentina, biological invasion, China, genetic differentiation, multiple introductions. Resumen: No hay diferencias en la diversidad genética entre arbustos de Cotoneaster franchetii (Rosaceae) de rangos nativos y no nativos. La diversidad genética de los arbustos de Cotoneaster franchetii es similar entre los rangos de distribución nativo y no nativo. Debido al efecto fundador comúnmente se asume que las plantas tienen mayor diversidad genética en su rango nativo que en las áreas donde fueron introducidos.
[Show full text]
Plant Check List
1 Vascular Plants of MacKerricher State Park A Latin Binomial Common Name Glass Bch. only FERNS Athyriaceae Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosorum lady fern Azollaceae Azolla filiculoides mosquito fern Blechnaceae Struthiopteris spicant deer fern Woodwardia fimbriata giant chain fern Cystopteridaceae Cystopteris fragilis fragile fern Dennstaedtiaceae Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens bracken Dryopteridaceae Drypoteris arguta wood fern Polystichum munitum western sword fern Equisetaceae Equisetum arvense field horsetail Equisetum hyemale ssp. affine common scouring-rush Equisetum laevigatum smooth scouring-rush Equisetum telmateia ssp. braunii giant horsetail Ophioglossaceae Sceptridium multifidum moonwort; grape fern Polypodiaceae Polypodium californicum California polypody Polypdium calirhiza polypody fern Polypodium scouleri Pteridaceae Pentagramma triangularis goldback fern GYMNOSPERMS Cupressaceae Hesperocyparis macrocarpa* Monterey cypress Sequoia sempervirens coast redwood Pinaceae Abies grandis grand fir Pinus contorta ssp. contorta shore pine; beach pine Pinus muricata Bishop pine Pinus radiata* Monterey pine Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas-fir NYMPHAEALES Nymphaeaceae Nuphar polysepala yellow pond-lily EUDICOTS Adoxaceae Sambucus racemosa var. racemosa red elderberry Aizoaceae Carpobrotus chilensis* sea fig; iceplant Carpobrotus edulis* Hottentot-fig; iceplant Lampranthus spectabilis* redflush iceplant Tetragonia tetragonioides* New Zealand spinach Anacardiaceae Toxicodendrom diversilobum poison-oak Apiaceae Angelica hendersonii
[Show full text]
A Phyto Pharmacological Review on Cotoneaster Microphyllus Species
S.Swati et al /J. Pharm. Sci. & Res. Vol. 10(9), 2018, 2166-2168 A Phyto Pharmacological Review on Cotoneaster microphyllus Species S.Swati*1,R.R. Manjula2,K.Sowjanya3,Y.Vennela4,K.Tanuja5 1Assistant Professor,Department of Pharmaceutics,Nirmala college of Pharmacy,Atmakur,Guntur,A.P,India 2,3Associate Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical and Phytochemistry,,Nirmala college of Pharmacy,Atmakur,Guntur,A.P,India 4,5 Bachelor of Pharmacy, Nirmala college of Pharmacy,Atmakur,Guntur,A.P,India Abstract: Rockspray Cotoneaster is a prostrate, mat-forming shrub which will climb over rocks. It is a strong contender for the plant found at highest altitudes.In this review a brief discussion of cotoneaster microphyllus species were discussed and compared its habit and habitats of various species . It has wide uses and benefits along with toxic effects as well as phytochemical and pharmacological activity responsible for anti diabetic activity and anti diarrhoearial activity. Keywords : cotoneaster microphyllus, toxic effects, phytochemical and pharmacological activity. INTRODUCTION: River valley, Tibet. The fruit has important ornamental value Cotoneaster microphyllus is a evergreen unpopular plant mostly due to its persistent brilliant color.[9] Common name is found in the hill station areas Cotoneaster microphyllus is a cotoneaster conspicuous Decorus.[10]And these are native to medicinal plant belonging to the family rosaceae and is a rich south east Tibet.It grows to 1to 1.5 meters height with white source of flavonoids and glycosides which are distributed in the five stellate flowers followed by fruit.[11] parts leaves,berries,flowers of the plant. These flavonoids have • Cotoneaster microphyllus var .
[Show full text]
Planting Plan Layout and Density/Centres As Shown
© Floyd Matcham (Dorset) Ltd 2019 NOTE: NDR planting THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PRODUCED BY ELECTRONIC MEANS. SOFT LANDSCAPE WORKS SPECIFICATION SHOULD THE SCALE MEASUREMENTS BE TAKEN BY MEANS OTHER THAN ELECTRONIC (e.g. FROM A PRINTED COPY), THE FOLLOWING MUST BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION NDR PREPARATION BEFORE SCALING IS UNDERTAKEN: planting SUBSOIL SURFACE PREPARATION Loosening: - Light and non-cohesive subsoils: When ground conditions are reasonably dry, loosen thoroughly to a depth of 300 mm. - Stiff clay and cohesive subsoils: When ground conditions are reasonably dry, 1. ENSURE THAT THE COPY HAS BEEN PRINTED/PLOTTED loosen thoroughly to a depth of 450 mm. ON THE STATED SHEET SIZE WITH THE PLOTTING SCALE SET TO A CORRECT RATIO IMPORTED TOPSOIL (TO BS 3882) Provide to fill planting beds Grade: To BS 3882, Multi Purpose Grade. Source: Submit 2. ENSURE THAT AN ADEQUATE ALLOWANCE (DEPENDANT proposals. Submit: Declaration of analysis including information detailing each of the relevant parameters given in BS 3882, ON THE STATED SCALE) IS MADE FOR THE INEVITABLE clause 6 and table 2. DISTORTIONS INTRODUCED BY PLOTTING/PRINTING AND COPYING PROCESSES SPREADING TOPSOIL Layers: - Depth (maximum): 150 mm. - Gently firm each layer before spreading the next. Depths after firming and settlement (minimum): 450 mm for shrub planting and 150mm for lawn Crumb structure: Do not compact topsoil. Preserve a friable texture of separate visible crumbs wherever possible. FINISHED LEVELS OF TOPSOIL AFTER SETTLEMENT Above adjoining paving or kerbs: 20 mm. Shrub areas: Higher than adjoining grass areas by 25 mm. Within root spread of existing trees: Unchanged. Adjoining soil areas: Marry in.
[Show full text]
Frankston Vegetation Study 2006
Frankston Vegetation Study 2006 Project 05-5 Planning Review Prepared for: Frankston City Council Ecology Australia Pty Ltd Flora and Fauna Consultants 88B Station Street, Fairfield, Victoria, Australia 3078 Tel: (03) 9489 4191 Fax: (03) 9481 7679 www.ecologyaustralia.com.au [email protected] Copyright 2006 Ecology Australia Pty Ltd This publication is copyright. It may only be used in accordance with the agreed terms of the commission. Except as provided for by the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without prior written permission of Ecology Australia Pty Ltd. Document information This is a controlled document. Details of the document ownership, location, distribution, status and revision history and are listed below. All comments or requests for changes to content should be addressed to the document owner. Owner Ecology Australia Pty Ltd Author Sarah Bedggood, Lisa Crowfoot, Nina Roberts, Cherie Campbell, Jamie McMahon and Ann McGregor Location Frankston Vegetation Study 2006.doc Document History Status Changes By Date Draft Draft 0.1 Sarah Bedggood 07/04/06 Final Draft Draft 0.2 Sarah Bedggood 12/05/2006 Final final Sarah Bedggood 02/08/2006 Final Frankston Vegetation Study 2006 with maps & App 4.doc i Frankston Vegetation Study 2006 Contents Summary 1 1 Introduction 2 2 Study Area 3 3 Methods 4 3.1 Literature review 4 3.2 GIS 4 3.3 Taxonomy 5 3.4 Field surveys 5 4 Vegetation 7 4.1 Ecological Vegetation Classes 7 4.2 EVC Descriptions 11 4.3 Significance of vegetation 34 5 Management Issues 36 6 Review of legislation and planning controls relating to native vegetation 39 6.1 Legislation and policies for native vegetation protection 39 6.2 Native vegetation protection in the Frankston Planning Scheme 48 7 Recommendations 51 8 Acknowlegements 53 9 References 54 Tables Table 1.
[Show full text]
Risk Assessment Cotoneaster
Risk assessment Cotoneaster Edu Boer September 2014 Table of contents 1. Introduction — 3 2. Cotoneaster: taxonomy, morphology and ecology — 4 2.1. Taxonomy — 4 2.2. Morphology — 4 2.3. Ecology — 5 3. Risk assessment — 6 3.1. Selection of species — 6 3.2. Entry — 7 3.3. Establishment — 8 3.4. Spread — 10 3.5. Endangered areas — 11 3.6. Impact — 11 4. Risk management — 13 4.1. Prevention of deliberate plantings — 13 4.2. Prevention of dispersal — 13 4.3. Eradication and control — 13 4.4. Conclusions — 14 5. References — 15 Annex 1. Risk assessment scores using the ISEIA protocol — 17 Annex 2. Photo credits — 19 This report was commissioned by the Invasive Alien Species Team of the Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. My colleagues Dr. Filip Verloove, Dr. Leni Duistermaat and Dr. Johan van Valkenburg are acknowledged for their valued suggestions for improvement. 2 Naturalis Biodiversity Center 1. Introduction Cotoneaster divaricatus Exotic, invasive plant species have a negative impact on biodiversity, economy and/or public health. Cotoneaster species are potentially invasive alien plant species. For this reason the Invasive Alien Species Team of the Netherlands Food and Con- sumer Product Safety Authority has requested a risk assessment for Cotoneaster. The current risk assessment will focus on the situation in the Netherlands and discuss the following subjects: • Determination of what Cotoneaster species are potentially invasive in the Netherlands • Probability of entry • Probability of establishment in the Netherlands • Probability of spread • Identification of endangered areas based on the results of the probabilities of entry, establishment and spread • I mpact of Cotoneaster spp.
[Show full text]
Mckay Forest Trails Special-Status Plant Survey Report
FINAL REPORT ◦ SEPTEMBER 2019 Special-Status Plant Surveys for the McKay Community Forest Trail Plan Implementation Project Humboldt County, California PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY Humboldt County Stillwater Sciences Department of Public Works 850 G Street, Suite K 1106 Second Street Arcata, CA 95501 Eureka, CA 95501 Stillwater Sciences Special-Status Plant Surveys for the McKay Community Forest Trail Plan Implementation Project Suggested citation: Stillwater Sciences. 2019. Special-status Plant Surveys for the McKay Community Forest Trail Plan Implementation Project. Final Report. Prepared by Stillwater Sciences, Arcata, California for Humboldt County Department of Public Works, Eureka, California. Cover photos (clockwise from upper left): Dense forest understory vegetation within Mid-McKay trail planning unit (May 2019), dispersed trail near Ryan Creek to be incorporated into the trail system (July 2019), special-status plant Pleuropogon refractus (nodding semaphore grass) observed within the South-McKay trail planning unit (May 2019), and Picea sitchensis (Sitka spruce) in the Mid-McKay trail planning unit (July 2019). September 2019 Stillwater Sciences i Special-Status Plant Surveys for the McKay Community Forest Trail Plan Implementation Project Table of Contents 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Project Location
[Show full text]