Today We Are Going to Turn Away from the Near East for the First Time and Begin to Look at Europe. the First Civiliza- Tion of E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Today We Are Going to Turn Away from the Near East for the First Time and Begin to Look at Europe. the First Civiliza- Tion of E WESTERN CIV. I C Greece: From Oikos to The Greek Art of War Sparta Polis and The Polis Page 4 Page 9 Page 13 Today we are going to turn away from the Near East for the first time and begin to look at Europe. The first civiliza- tion of Europe that we are to study is that of Greece; but before turning to history, we must look briefly at the geog- raphy of the Greek lands. In ancient times, the center of the Greek world was not the modern country of Greece at all, but the body of water called the Aegean Sea. The Greeks settled along the coasts of this sea, including the eastern fringe which is now a part of Turkey. In general, the most important Greek areas were those close to the sea. There was also considerable settlement in the islands of the Aegean. The Aegean area where the Greeks lived was very different from the Near Eastern regions which we have discussed so far. There are no large rivers in the Greek world, so that Greek development was not dominated by rivers as in Egypt and Mesopotamia. Fortunately, rainfall in Greece was heavier than in the East so that desert conditions Mycenaean Civilization did not appear. The country is generally broken up by mountains which form many Mycenae was a citadel small valleys but few large plains. Because of the mountains it was difficult for Greeks palace that included exten- to travel from one place to another by land. This is why from very earliest times, the sive fortifications, granaries, Greeks relied on the sea as a means of getting from place to place. They were sailors guardrooms, shrines and a and traders. few private dwellings situ- This Aegean region was inhabited by civilized peoples from about 1950 B.C. on- ated around the palace ward. The civilization in this early period differed in many respects from the civiliza- tion of later Greece, and I want to consider it as a separate phase of Aegean history. complex. It is among the Bronze Age civilization in Greece is called by historians the Mycenaean Civilization, best examples of Bronze or sometimes, the Helladic. It lasted from about 1600 to 1200 B. C. The name Myce- Age Aegean architecture. naean was given to the period by archaeologists who read their Homer and believed that the first Greek site that they discovered was the city of Mycenae in the Iliad. P a g e 1 o f 16 Until relatively recently, modern scholars had very little information as to what this Mycenaean Civilization was like. The Greeks of later times had many myths and legends about great heroes who lived in Greece in the Bronze Age, but most of these stories were long regarded as fictitious. Then, in 1876, a German archeologist named Heinrich Schliemann decided to go to Greece to look for traces of the Bronze-Age inhabitants. He conducted archeological work at a place called Mycenae in southern Greece. As a re- sult, he found the first important remains of the Bronze Age peoples. For this reason, the civilization is called Mycenaean. Since Schliemann’s time, there have been many finds at other sites. Most of the discoveries have consisted merely of buildings and artifacts, but in 1938, an American expedition found a series of 600 clay tablets which were preserved in a build- ing that had burned down at Pylos. The tab- lets are written in a kind of syllabic picture writing, which archeologists called Linear B script. In 1953, an Englishman named Mi- Bronze Age Aegean Civilization chael Ventris succeeded in deciphering this script, thus making it possible to read the tab- Three distinct Bronze Age Civilizations grew up in the Aegean lets and to identify the language in which they area. The Minoan culture (in an earlier lecture) grew up on the were written. The discovery was important island of Crete. The Cycladic culture grew up on the Aegean because it showed that the language was not islands in the late Neolithic and early Bronze Age, and the only a member of the Indo-European family, Mycenaean culture (see map but an ancestor of later classical Greek. So above). Mycenaean culture the Mycenaeans were evidently one group of was a Late Bronze Age ancestors of later Greeks who migrated into Culture that employed the Aegean world before the other Greeks chariot warfare and fell arrived. during the Catastrophe of On the basis of this evidence, it is now 1200 to be replace with a possible to draw some tentative conclusions new Iron Age Culture in about the organization of the Mycenaean Greece after about 1100 Civilization. There were many different cen- ters of Mycenaean settlement, and they are B.C.. all very similar. Each is dominated by a large fort set on a high hill. Inside the fort is a pal- ace, residences for a few officials, and large storerooms for grain, wine and other prod- Right: A Mycenaean ucts. The fort itself was reserved for the ruler and his aides. Most of the population lived in amphora, ca. 1350 B.C. small crude villages scattered in the farmlands surrounding the fort. P a g e 2 o f 16 Mycenaean Society This suggests that there was a clearly dominant class of rulers who were set apart from everyone else. The graves seem to bear this out. A few Mycenaean families were buried in elaborate tombs dug out of the ground and lined with blocks of stone. They were often buried with gold and other precious items. But most people were buried simply in the ground with a few pots. The 600 clay tablets are all economic records, lists of goods deposited in the forts. But they do give us some idea of what the government was like. There was no central government in Greece extending over the whole civilization. Each fort was the residence of an independent ruler called a wanax. The word wanax, which means lord, is significant in itself. The later classical Greeks used this world only in referring to gods. We also know from the tablets that the wanax was con- nected in some way with various fertility gods of the Mycenaeans. From this evidence, modern scholars have concluded that the wanax was either considered to be a god or appointed by gods. The very fact that the tablets are economic records suggests that the wanax controlled economic life in the region he ruled. The wanax at Pylos, where the records were found, collected tribute from a large area in southwestern Greece – an area greater than any ruled by a single state in classical Greek times. He apparently had a number of lesser administrative and military officials to help him maintain his government. Now all of this ought to sound familiar to you because it is similar to what we saw earlier in the ancient Near Eastern civilizations. The Mycenaeans had a divine or semi-divine ruler, they had a highly centralized government and economy, and a small ruling class. Why it is so similar to the Near East is not hard to figure out, because the Mycenaeans had a lot of contact with the East. They were good sailors, and it was easy for them to trade with the more advanced peoples of the Near East. We know from pottery and other objects that they did trade with the Hittites, the Canaanites, and especially with Egypt. They seem to have gotten their ideas of what government should be like from the Near East. They were far enough away so that there was some differences in organization, art, and religion. But basically they were not too different from the Near Easterners. Collapse of Mycenaean Civilization The Mycenaean culture flourished until about 1200 B.C. At this time, new settlements and burial patterns became established all over the Aegean – especially in Greece. Somewhat later, Bronze Age tools began to be replaced with iron technology. The Mycenaean culture that had dominated Greece vanished altogether. In fact, archaeological evidence indi- cates that around 1200 B.C. civilizations all over the eastern Med. were either destroyed or aversely effected by something, and scholars have come to call that something the catastrophe of the 1200s B.C. Various scholars have come up with a number of interpretations to try to explain the catastrophe. So, we should review the main interpretations briefly. Whatever the cause, the collapse was complete. All of the traits which we associate with the civilization disappeared. Linear B writing disappeared, and it was not found again. Writing does not start again until about 750 B. C., and it is a completely different kind of writing introduced from Phoenicia. The forts were abandoned, and no large buildings or elaborate tombs are found again for about 400 years. Metal did not disappear completely, but bronze tended to be re- placed by a very inferior, at first, kind of iron. Written records vanished along with Bronze Age technology. The period of Greek history from the collapse of the Bronze Age to about 800 B.C. is often called the Greek Dark Age because so little written evidence of the period exists. We will look at this period in a bit, but first, let’s take a look at the geography of the Aegean and Greece because the geography of the area will have a great deal of influence on Greek civilization. P a g e 3 o f 16 Greece: From Oikos to Polis Location and Climate: The Greek world consists of the Mediterranean basin.
Recommended publications
  • The Evolution of Power and Politics in the Mycenaean World and Its Reflection in the Homeric Epic: the Iliad
    Near East University (NEU) Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Department of International Relations The Evolution of Power and Politics in the Mycenaean World and its Reflection in the Homeric Epic: the Iliad By: Nicolaie A. Şorodoc We certify that the thesis is satisfactory for the award of the Degree of Master of International Relations Examining committee: Prof. Dr. Levent Köker Faculty of Law, Department of Law, NEU Prof. Dr. Jouni Suistola Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of International Relations, NEU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ali Efdal Özkul Faculty of Education, Department of History Teaching, NEU Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Aykut Polatoğlu 1 Jury Report June, 2010 Student Info: Full Name Nicolaie Alin Şorodoc Faculty Economics and Administrative Sciences Institution Near East University Department International Relations Thesis Info: Title: The Evolution of Power and Politics in the Mycenaean World and its Reflection in the Homeric Epic the Iliad Abstract: This study tries to go beyond the boundaries of present day issues and examine the evolution of power and politics of the Mycenaean people during the Bronze Age. At each stage, be it big-man leadership, chiefdom or state based society I examine how power and social complexity increases and what were the reasons behind such a phenomenon. I start with some few considerations regarding developments during the Neolithic and Early Bronze Age and then I jump to the question of the “coming of the Greeks.” I argue that any explanation of the political life shall start from early stages; it is only then that we might get a measured insight in respect to the workings of political and social institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Mycenaean Arkadia: Space and Place(S) of an Inland and Mountainous Region
    Early Mycenaean Arkadia: Space and Place(s) of an Inland and Mountainous Region Eleni Salavoura1 Abstract: The concept of space is an abstract and sometimes a conventional term, but places – where people dwell, (inter)act and gain experiences – contribute decisively to the formation of the main characteristics and the identity of its residents. Arkadia, in the heart of the Peloponnese, is a landlocked country with small valleys and basins surrounded by high mountains, which, according to the ancient literature, offered to its inhabitants a hard and laborious life. Its rough terrain made Arkadia always a less attractive area for archaeological investigation. However, due to its position in the centre of the Peloponnese, Arkadia is an inevitable passage for anyone moving along or across the peninsula. The long life of small and medium-sized agrarian communities undoubtedly owes more to their foundation at crossroads connecting the inland with the Peloponnesian coast, than to their potential for economic growth based on the resources of the land. However, sites such as Analipsis, on its east-southeastern borders, the cemetery at Palaiokastro and the ash altar on Mount Lykaion, both in the southwest part of Arkadia, indicate that the area had a Bronze Age past, and raise many new questions. In this paper, I discuss the role of Arkadia in early Mycenaean times based on settlement patterns and excavation data, and I investigate the relation of these inland communities with high-ranking central places. In other words, this is an attempt to set place(s) into space, supporting the idea that the central region of the Peloponnese was a separated, but not isolated part of it, comprising regions that are also diversified among themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient History Sourcebook: 11Th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA an Ancient City in Greece, the Capital of Laconia and the Most Powerful State of the Peloponnese
    Ancient History Sourcebook: 11th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA AN ancient city in Greece, the capital of Laconia and the most powerful state of the Peloponnese. The city lay at the northern end of the central Laconian plain, on the right bank of the river Eurotas, a little south of the point where it is joined by its largest tributary, the Oenus (mount Kelefina). The site is admirably fitted by nature to guard the only routes by which an army can penetrate Laconia from the land side, the Oenus and Eurotas valleys leading from Arcadia, its northern neighbour, and the Langada Pass over Mt Taygetus connecting Laconia and Messenia. At the same time its distance from the sea-Sparta is 27 m. from its seaport, Gythium, made it invulnerable to a maritime attack. I.-HISTORY Prehistoric Period.-Tradition relates that Sparta was founded by Lacedaemon, son of Zeus and Taygete, who called the city after the name of his wife, the daughter of Eurotas. But Amyclae and Therapne (Therapnae) seem to have been in early times of greater importance than Sparta, the former a Minyan foundation a few miles to the south of Sparta, the latter probably the Achaean capital of Laconia and the seat of Menelaus, Agamemnon's younger brother. Eighty years after the Trojan War, according to the traditional chronology, the Dorian migration took place. A band of Dorians united with a body of Aetolians to cross the Corinthian Gulf and invade the Peloponnese from the northwest. The Aetolians settled in Elis, the Dorians pushed up to the headwaters of the Alpheus, where they divided into two forces, one of which under Cresphontes invaded and later subdued Messenia, while the other, led by Aristodemus or, according to another version, by his twin sons Eurysthenes and Procles, made its way down the Eurotas were new settlements were formed and gained Sparta, which became the Dorian capital of Laconia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battlefield Role of the Classical Greek General
    _________________________________________________________________________Swansea University E-Theses The battlefield role of the Classical Greek general. Barley, N. D How to cite: _________________________________________________________________________ Barley, N. D (2012) The battlefield role of the Classical Greek general.. thesis, Swansea University. http://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa43080 Use policy: _________________________________________________________________________ This item is brought to you by Swansea University. Any person downloading material is agreeing to abide by the terms of the repository licence: copies of full text items may be used or reproduced in any format or medium, without prior permission for personal research or study, educational or non-commercial purposes only. The copyright for any work remains with the original author unless otherwise specified. The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder. Permission for multiple reproductions should be obtained from the original author. Authors are personally responsible for adhering to copyright and publisher restrictions when uploading content to the repository. Please link to the metadata record in the Swansea University repository, Cronfa (link given in the citation reference above.) http://www.swansea.ac.uk/library/researchsupport/ris-support/ Swansea University Prifysgol Abertawe The Battlefield Role of the Classical Greek General N. D. Barley Ph.D. Submitted to the Department of History and Classics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2012 ProQuest Number: 10821472 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Greek Society by Mark Cartwright Published on 15 May 2018
    Ancient Greek Society by Mark Cartwright published on 15 May 2018 Although ancient Greek Society was dominated by the male citizen, with his full legal status, right to vote, hold public oce, and own property, the social groups which made up the population of a typical Greek city-state or polis were remarkably diverse. Women, children, immigrants (both Greek and foreign), labourers, and slaves all had dened roles, but there was interaction (oen illicit) between the classes and there was also some movement between social groups, particularly for second-generation ospring and during times of stress such as wars. The society of ancient Greece was largely composed of the following groups: male citizens - three groups: landed aristocrats (aristoi), poorer farmers (periokoi) and the middle class (artisans and traders). semi-free labourers (e.g the helots of Sparta). women - belonging to all of the above male groups but without citizen rights. children - categorised as below 18 years generally. slaves - the douloi who had civil or military duties. foreigners - non-residents (xenoi) or foreign residents (metoikoi) who were below male citizens in status. Classes Although the male citizen had by far the best position in Greek society, there were dierent classes within this group. Top of the social tree were the ‘best people’, the aristoi. Possessing more money than everyone else, this class could provide themselves with armour, weapons, and a horse when on military campaign. The aristocrats were oen split into powerful family factions or clans who controlled all of the important political positions in the polis. Their wealth came from having property and even more importantly, the best land, i.e.: the most fertile and the closest to the protection oered by the city walls.
    [Show full text]
  • Allotment and Democracy in Ancient Greece
    Allotment and Democracy in Ancient Greece Paul DEMONT Contrary to the view generally accepted among historians of antiquity on the authority of Plato and Aristotle, allotment does not strictly go hand in hand with democracy. According to Paul Demont, it was rather the establishment of democracy that gradually democratized a practice that was originally aristocratic and religious. ''Democracy arises after the poor are victorious over their adversaries, some of whom they kill and others of whom they exile, then they share out equally with the rest of the population political offices and burdens; and in this regime public offices are usually allocated by lot'' (Plato, Republic VIII, 557a). ''It is accepted as democratic when public offices are allocated by lot, and as oligarchic when they are filled by election'' (Aristotle, Politics IV. 9, 1294b8). “The characteristics of democracy are as follows: the election of officers by all out of all; and that all should rule over each, and each in his turn over all; that the appointment to all offices, or to all but those which require experience and skill, should be made by lot” (Aristotle, Politics VI. 2, 1317b17-21). This feature of ancient democracy, much commented upon by ancients and moderns alike, must be contextualized. Allotment was a common procedure for making choices in all ancient societies, democratic or not, and in Greek society 1 of the archaic and classic periods, it often had a religious importance. Mogens H. Hansen, in 2 his important book on Athenian democracy , denies this fact, in order to refute Fustel de 1 See Pubblico sorteggio e cleromanzia: alcuni esempi, a.c.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the TROUBLE with ARISTOCRACY Hans Van
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UCL Discovery 1 THE TROUBLE WITH ARISTOCRACY Hans van Wees and Nick Fisher ‘The history of aristocracies … is littered with self-serving myths which outsiders have been surprisingly willing to accept uncritically’, a recent study warns (Doyle 2010, xv). Our volume shows that ancient ‘aristocracies’ and their modern students are no exception. In antiquity, upper classes commonly claimed that they had inherited, or ought to have inherited, their status, privilege and power because their families excelled in personal virtues such as generosity, hospitality and military prowess while abstaining from ignoble ‘money-making’ pursuits such as commerce or manual labour. In modern scholarship, these claims are often translated into a belief that a hereditary ‘aristocratic’ class is identifiable at most times and places in the ancient world, whether or not it is in actually in power as an oligarchy, and that deep ideological divisions existed between ‘aristocratic values’ and the norms and ideals of lower or ‘middling’ classes. Such ancient claims and modern interpretations are pervasively questioned in this volume.1 We suggest that ‘aristocracy’ is only rarely a helpful concept for the analysis of political struggles and historical developments or of ideological divisions and contested discourses in literary and material cultures in the ancient world. Moreover, we argue that a serious study of these subjects requires close analysis of the nature of social inequality in any given time and place, rather than broad generalizations about aristocracies or indeed other elites and their putative ideologies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Riddle of Ancient Sparta: Unwrapping the Enigma
    29 May 2018 The Riddle of Ancient Sparta: Unwrapping the Enigma PROFESSOR PAUL CARTLEDGE (Sir Winston) Churchill once famously referred to Soviet Russia as ‘a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma’. My title is a simplified version of that seemingly obscure remark. The point of contact and comparison between ancient Sparta and modern Soviet Russia is the nature of the evidence for them, and the way in which they have been imagined and represented, by outsiders. There was a myth - or mirage – of ancient Sparta, as there was of Soviet Russia: typically, the outsider who commented was both very ignorant and either wildly PRO or – as in Churchill’s case – wildly ANTI. There was no moderate, middle way. The ‘Spartan Tradition’ (Elizabeth Rawson) is alive and – well, ‘well’ to this day. To start us off, I give you a relatively gentle, deliberately inoffensive and very British example of the PRO myth, mirage, legend or tradition of ancient Sparta. In 2017 Terry’s of York confectioners would have been celebrating its 150th anniversary, had it not been taken over by Kraft in 1993. A long discontinued but still long cherished Terry’s line was their ‘Spartan’ assortment: hard-centre chocolates, naturally. Because the Spartans were the ultimate ancient warriors, uber-warriors, if you like. And their fearsome reputation on the battlefield had won them not just respect but fame – and not just in antiquity: think only of the Battle of Thermopylae in 480 BCE – and of the movie 300. But of course the Spartans were no mere chocolate box soldiers - they were the real thing, the hard men of ancient Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonlit | Greek Society
    Name: Class: Greek Society By Mark Cartwright From Www.Ancient.Eu 2013 Mark Cartwright is a scholar of Greek philosophy and a frequent contributor to the Ancient History Encyclopedia. Ancient Greece (c. 8th to 5th centuries BC) was populated by a diverse number of social groups divided by age, gender, wealth, citizenship, and legal establishment of freedom. The following text explores these various social groups and paints a picture of what life was like in ancient Greek society. As you read, take notes on the similarities and differences in lifestyle between the different social classes and groups of people in ancient Greece. [1] Although the male citizen, with his full legal status, right to vote, hold public office, and own property, may well have dominated1 Greek Society, the social groups which made up the population of a typical Greek city-state or polis were remarkably diverse. Women, children, immigrants (both Greek and foreign), laborers, and slaves all had defined roles, but there was interaction (often illicit2) between the classes and there was also some movement between social groups, particularly for second generation offspring3 and during times of stress such as wars. ; Classes Although the male citizen had by far the best position in Greek society, there were different classes within this group. The top of the social tree was the “best people,” the aristoi.4 Possessing more money than everyone else, this class could provide themselves with armor, weapons, and a horse when on military "Greece-0120 - Caryatids" by Dennis Jarvis is licensed under CC BY- 5 6 campaign. The aristocrats were often split into SA 2.0.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscapes of the Ancient Peloponnese. a Humangeographical Approach Shipley, Graham
    Landscapes of the ancient Peloponnese. A humangeographical approach Shipley, Graham Citation Shipley, G. (2006). Landscapes of the ancient Peloponnese. A humangeographical approach. Leidschrift : Cultuur En Natuur, 21(April), 27-44. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/72722 Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown) License: Leiden University Non-exclusive license Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/72722 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). Landscapes of the ancient Peloponnese. A human- geographical approach Graham Shipley Landscape and environment are currently of compelling cultural significance, as fields of scholarly research, sites of artistic creativity and arenas of public concern. As both imaginative representations and material realities, landscape and environment matter as a medium for the expression of complex ideas and feelings, about beauty, belonging, access to resources, relations with nature, the past and the future, making sense of the world and people’s place in it.1 This paper suggests new approaches to the ancient history of the Peloponnese, Greece. It is intended as a spur to discussion rather than the consolidated result of complete work. It proposes that ancient historians could now go further than before in adopting ideas from geographical approaches, which may allow us to investigate – in greater depth than before – aspects such as the meanings and emotions attached to landscapes, the nature of regionalism, and the extent and nature of connections and interactions between regions and smaller units. This suggestion arises from the author’s current work on Macedonian power in the Peloponnese. The period this article deals with approximately runs from the defeat of the southern Greeks by Philip II of Macedonia in 338 BC to the Roman intervention in the Peloponnese during the 190s BC.
    [Show full text]
  • New Hippopotamid Finds in Eurotas Valley (Laconia, Greece)
    Scientific Annals, School of Geology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki Special volume 99 57-62 Proceedings of the XIX CBGA Congress, Thessaloniki, Greece 2010 NEW HIPPOPOTAMID FINDS IN EUROTAS VALLEY (LACONIA, GREECE) Athanassiou A. and Bouzas D. Hellenic Ministry of Culture, Department of Palaeoanthropology–Speleology, Ardittou 34B, 116 36 Athens, Greece. [email protected],[email protected] Abstract: A new locality tracked down in the Eurotas Valley (Laconia, Greece) yielded mammalian dental remains of a young individual referred to as Hippopotamus antiquus. The findings are of very large size compared to already known specimens from Greece and W. Europe. The new locality is bi- ochronologically dated at the Early–Middle Pleistocene. Keywords: Hippopotamus Laconia, Peloponnesus, Greece, Pleistocene 1. Introduction area of the Eurotas Valley: Georgalas (1941) de- scribes a proboscidean molar from Skoúra, SE of During a geological survey in Eurotas valley (La- Sparta, which he refers to the Pliocene species conia, Peloponnesus) in October 2006, a new Anancus arvernensis. Sidiropoulou (1972) refers mammal locality was discovered. The site, dubbed an equid maxillary fragment from Vrontamás, pre- ―Myrtiá‖ (MYP), is located in the area among the serving cheek teeth in both sides, to Equus cabal- small town of Vlachiótis and the villages of Myrtiá lus forma primitiva; however, its dental characters, and Peristéri, near the road that leads from Myrtiá as the short protocones and the narrow styles, indi- to the main road of Skála–Vlachiótis (Fig. 1). It is cate that the specimen belongs to a stenonid horse a small remnant of an old terrace of the river Euro- of Late Pliocene or Early Pleistocene age.
    [Show full text]
  • BEEKEEPING in the MEDITERRANEAN from ANTIQUITY to the PRESENT Front Cover Photographs
    Edited by: Fani Hatjina, Georgios Mavrofridis, Richard Jones BEEKEEPING IN THE MEDITERRANEAN FROM ANTIQUITY TO THE PRESENT Front cover photographs Part of a beehive lid. Early Byzantine period (Mesogeia plain, Attica. “Exhibition of Archaeological Findings”, Athens International Airport. Photo: G. Mavrofridis). Beehive from a country house of the 4th century B.C. (Mesogeia plain, Attica. “Exhibition of Archaeological Findings”, Athens International Airport. Photo: G. Mavrofridis). Traditional ceramic beehive “kambana” (bell) in its bee bole (Andros Island. Photo: F. Hatjina). Back cover photographs Stone built apiary of the 18th century from Neochori, Messinia, Peloponnese (Photo: G. Ratia). Ruins of a bee house from Andros Island. Inside view (Photos: G. Ratia). Walls of a mill house with bee balls from Andros Island. Inside view (Photo: G. Ratia). Traditional pottery beehives and their bee boles: the ‘bee garden’, Andros Island (Photo: G. Ratia). Ruins of a bee house (the ‘cupboards’) from Zaharias, Andros Island. Outside view (Photo: G. Ratia). Bee boles from Andros Island (Photo: G. Ratia). Edited by: Nea Moudania 2017 Fani Hatjina, Georgios Mavrofridis, Richard Jones Based on selected presentations of the INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM of BEEKEEPING IN THE MEDITERRANEAN SYROS, OCTOBER 9-11 2014 © DIVISION of APICULTURE Hellenic Agricultural Organization “DEMETER”-GREECE CHAMBER of CYCLADES EVA CRANE TRUST - UK Dedicated to the memory of Thanassis Bikos hanassis Bikos was a pioneer of the valuable legacy for current and future research- systematic research on traditional bee- ers of the beekeeping tradition. keeping in Greece. From the early 1990s The creation of a museum of Greek beekeep- until the end of his life he studied the ing was a life dream for Thanassis, for which traditionalT beekeeping aspects in most regions he gathered material for more than thirty-five of Greece.
    [Show full text]