Hiding in Plain Sight: Gender, Sexism and Press Coverage of the Jimmy Savile Case Author: Karen Boyle Affiliation: Communications, Media & Culture; University of Stirling; UK. Email:
[email protected] Acknowledgements: Thanks to Clare McFeely and Oona Brooks at the University of Glasgow for the invitation to participate in the seminar on moral panics and sexual abuse which gave rise to my research on Savile; to colleagues at the Feminist and Women’s Studies Association conference in Leeds where I presented the first stages of this research; and to Susan Berridge for her comments on an earlier draft of this article. Abstract In 2012 – less than 12 months after his death – TV personality Jimmy Savile was revealed to have been a prolific sexual abuser of children and young adults, mainly girls and women. This study advances research on the gendering of violence in news discourse by examining press coverage in the period leading up to Savile’s unmasking. It investigates the conditions in which Savile’s predatory behaviour – widely acknowledged in his lifetime – finally became recast as (child sexual) abuse. Specifically, it challenges the gender-blind analyses of media coverage which have typified academic responses to date, arguing that Savile’s crimes – and the reporting of them – need to be understood in the broader context of everyday sexism: a contemporary, as well as an historic, issue. Keywords Jimmy Savile; news; journalism; gender; child sexual abuse; gender-based violence. Wordcount (excl title page): 8706 Hiding in Plain Sight: Gender, Sexism and Press Coverage of the Jimmy Savile Case Jimmy Savile was a fixture of British broadcasting – and, in particular, the BBC - for more than four decades.