Dynamics of Interaction Between Solitary and Rogue Wave of the Space-Time Fractional Broer–Kaup Models Arising in Shallow Water of Harbor and Coastal Zone
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Research Article Dynamics of interaction between solitary and rogue wave of the space-time fractional Broer–Kaup models arising in shallow water of harbor and coastal zone Selina Akter1,2 · Ratan Kumar Sen1 · Harun‑Or‑ Roshid1 Received: 26 May 2020 / Accepted: 28 October 2020 / Published online: 16 November 2020 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Abstract Under inquisition, we consider the space-time fractional Broer–Kaup model that replicate the real coastal profle to describe bidirectional wave transmission of long waves in shallow water. We integrate of the model via the unifed scheme to derive exact solitary wave solutions. The achieved results present the hyperbolic, trigonometric, and rational func- tions solutions. All of these solutions convey the periodic and solitonic natures. In particular, we present combo waves that imply a curvy periodic waves in which rogue waves occur in both sides of each waves. The dynamics of obtained nonlinear wave solutions are demonstrated in 3-D and 2-D shapes with defnite parametric values. It is shown that the obtained solutions of the model pact a very rich dynamical behavior and can be used to describe seismic type nonlinear wave motion in shallow water waves of the coastal and harbor region. Keywords The space-time fractional Broer–Kaup equation · The unifed method · Conformable derivative · Traveling wave solution 1 Introduction on numerical modeling of wave propagation [3–5]. Non- linear fractional derivatives are the appropriate tools for Generally, overall the world, configurations in the low modeling highly non-linear problems including seismic lying area of coastal region are often afected by Tsunami waves in harbor and coastal region. One of this model is wave pressure or cyclonic storm surge and such massive the space-time fractional Broer–Kaup model (FBKM) [3]. waves of the ocean and consequently damages. Mostly In this article, we shed light on the space-time fractional broken tsunami wave moves inland in the form of tur- Broer–Kaup model (FBKM) which is signifcant model to bulent hydraulic bores [1]. During tsunami type seismic describe bidirectional wave transmission of long waves in occur, region is severely damaged. Tsunamis type massive shallow water. The usual form of the space-time FBKM [3] waves create dissipated energy that travels through water is as follows medium and when the depth of the ocean decreases, the T uT u T v 0, wave height increase to higher. The velocity of tsunami t + x + x = waves depends on ocean intensity instead of the gap from � � � � � � the source of the wave [2]. It is, therefore, an important Tt v + Tx u + Tx (uv)+Tx Tx Tx u = 0, t > 0, 0 <�, � ≤ 1. event whose study will contribute to better understand- (1) ing of coastal hazards from seismic waves. Right now, such massive wave related research for the most part focuses * Harun-Or- Roshid, [email protected]; [email protected] | 1Department of Mathematics, Pabna University of Science and Technology, 6600, Pabna, Bangladesh. 2Department of Applied Mathematics, Gono Bishwabidyalay, Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh. SN Applied Sciences (2020) 2:2000 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03779-8 Vol.:(0123456789) Research Article SN Applied Sciences (2020) 2:2000 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03779-8 Here Tt and Tx indicate conformable fractional derivative sides of each waves and express in terms of rational, trigo- [4] reverence to t and x, respectively. Besides, the seismic nometric and hyperbolic functions. (earthquake, tsunami and typhoon) waves are refect as The structure of this paper goes along with: In Sect. 2, the solitary waves. Solitons are stable and confned non- we have recalled the unifed method. In Sect. 3, we have linear wave progressed balancing between nonlinearity presented the exact solutions to the space-time fractional and dispersion in an arrangement. Due to their rising in a Broer–Kaup equations employing the unifed method. In massive diversity in media, extending from fuids [5, 6] and Sect. 4, we have discussed obtaining solutions with the astrophysical plasmas [7, 8] to semiconductors [9, 10] and graphical representation and in the last section, conclu- nonlinear optics [11, 12], solitons have converted a sensi- sions are given. ble purpose for technical exploration. Such hip in natural structures, solitons can similarly be formed in laboratories as dual plasma schemes [13, 14], Joseph-son junctions [15, 2 The unifed method 16] and so on. With this point of view, deriving soliton and its interaction solution of nonlinear wave models attract a Here, we illustrate the unifed method [29, 30] for govern- much interest of young scientist [17–19]. Currently, many ing exact solutions of nonlinear partial diferential equa- scientists are working with considerable eforts on the tions (NLPDEs) in the subsequent way. Adopt a NPDE in fractional diferential models as it gives the real proper- two independent variables x and t is given by ties of natural phenomena [20, 21]. Tozar et. al. [22], Kurt P u, u , u , u , u , u , 0, [23], Kurt et. al. [24], Tasbozan [25] and Tasbozan et. al. [26] x xxt xxx t tt … = (2) investigated new solutions for the time fractional integra- where p is a polynomial in u = u(x, t) and its several deriva- ble dispersive model that arises in ocean engineering, the tives including the highest order derivatives and non- fractional Bogoyavlensky-Konopelchenko model that linear terms. arising in fuid dynamics, the fractional coupled Burgers’ Step-1: To convert the NLPDE into Ordinary diferential equation that arises as a model of poly-dispersive sedi- equation (ODE), we operate the traveling wave variable mentation, the time fractional Benjamin-Ono model that arises internal waves in deep water and the fractional u(x, t) = U(), = kx − t, (3) Drinfeld-Sokolov-Wilson system in shallow water waves respectively. Iyiola et. al. [27] studied on the analytical where k is constant and ω is the wave velocity. Now switch- solutions of the system of conformable time-fractional ing (3) into (2) we attain an ODE Robertson equations with 1-D difusion. Cenesiz et. al. [28] R u u u uu u , , , , … = 0. (4) established new exact solutions of Burgers’ type equations with conformable derivative. Step-2: Now we integrate (4) as many times as possible. Various approaches are used to study the above frac- Keep the integrating constant to zero. tional models. Recently, Gozukizil et. al. [29] proposed a unifed scheme that receiving much attention of young Assume that the solution of ODE (4) takes the follow- researcher to handle non-linear fractional diferential mod- ing form els. Beside this, some researcher has compared the all tanh N methods [8, 9] with the unifed method [29]. Akcagil and U() = l + l S()i + m S()−i , Aydemir [30] have exemplifed that the unifed method 0 i i (5) i=1 is not only more general than the family of tanh function methods but also it gives many more general solutions whose li (i = 0, 1, 2, …, N) and mi(i = 0, 1, 2, …, N) are con- than the new members of the family of (G′/G)-expansion stants to be calculated subsequently on the situation that method. They come to verdict that the unifed method lN and mN cannot be zero at a time. The function S(ξ) satis- gives many more general solutions in an elegant way than fes the Riccati equation, the family of the tanh-function methods. S� S 2 Therefore, the aim of this paper is to solve the space- = ( ()) + , (6) time fractional Broer–Kaup equation for finding exact whose solutions are specifed as follows: solitary wave solutions via the efective unifed method Case-1: Hyperbolic function (when λ < 0): [29, 30]. This method produces combo waves that imply a curvy periodic waves in which rogue waves occur in both Vol:.(1234567890) SN Applied Sciences (2020) 2:2000 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03779-8 Research Article 3 Solutions for the space-time FBK model −(l2+d2)−l − cosh 2 −(+E) , via the unifed method l sinh 2√ −(+E�) √+d � ⎧ √ − −(l2+d2)�−l√ − cosh� 2 −(+E) ⎪ , Now, we apply the unifed integral scheme to extract exact ⎪ l sinh 2√−(+E)� +√d � solutions of (1). First, we consider the following transfor- S() = ⎪ √ − cosh 2 �−√(+E) −sinh� 2 −(+E) −l mation to convert (1) into ordinary diferential equation ⎪ , ⎪ √ l+�cosh �2√−(+E)�−sinh �2√−(+E)� � (ODE): ⎨ l � �E � �E ⎪ − −cosh √2 −(+ ) −sinh √2 −(+ ) t x , u x t U a b ⎪ √ l+�cosh 2� −√(+E) +�sinh 2� −√(+E) �� ( , ) = (); = + , (7) ⎪ ⎪ � √ � � √ � Case-2⎪ : Trigonometric function (when λ > 0): where a, b are constants. ⎩ Plugging (7) into (1), we have the following ODE (l2−d2)−l cos 2 (+E) , aU� + bUU� + bV � = 0. (8) l sin 2√(+E�) √+d � ⎧ √ − (l2−d2)�−√l cos� 2 (+E) � � � � 3 ��� ⎪ , aV + bU + b UV + VU + b U = 0.. (9) ⎪ l sin 2 √(+E)� +√d � S() = ⎪ √ i cos 2� √(+E) +�sin 2 (+E) −il One time integration of (8) with respect to ξ, yields ⎪ , � � � � � � ⎪ √ l+cos 2√(+E) −i sin 2√ (+E) C 2 ⎨ 1 U a −i cos� √2 (+E�) +sin� 2√ (+E�) +il V = − − U. (10) ⎪ , b 2 b ⎪ √ �l+cos �2 √(+E) �+i sin �2√(+E)� � ⎪ Switching (8) into (7) yields a unique equation ⎪ � √ � � √ � where l⎪ ≠ 0 and d, E are real arbitrary constant. b 3a a2 ⎩ b3U�� − U3 − U2 + C + b − U − C = 0, Case-3: Rational function solutions (when λ = 0) 2 2 1 b 2 (11) 1 S() =− . here C and C are integration constants. + E 1 2 Now balancing the terms U″ and U3 of (11), unknown N Step-03: By homogeneous balance principle, we deter- becomes N = 1. mine the positive integer N of (4).