Seismotectonics of the April 25, 1992, Petrolia Earthquake and The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Seismotectonics of the April 25, 1992, Petrolia Earthquake and The TECTONICS, VOL. 14, NO. 5, PAGES, 1095-1103,OCTOBER 1995 Seismotectonicsof the April 25, 1992, Petrolla earthquake and the Mendocino triple junction region Yuichiro Tanioka, Kenji Satake,and Larry Ruff Departmentof GeologicalSciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Abstract. The April 25, 1992, Petrolia earthquake(Ms 7.1) 124ø34.47'W.The parametersof the secondaftershock (AF2) are occurredat the southerntip of the Cascadiasubduction zone. origin time 11:18:25.8 (GMT); location, 40ø23.40'N, This is thelargest thrust earthquake ever recorded instrumentally 124ø34.30'W.These earthquakes occurred near Cape Mendocino, in the Cascadiasubduction zone. The earthquakewas followed where the Pacific, North American, and Gorda plates meet by two large strike-slip aftershocks(both Ms 6.6). Moment (Figure 1). The Gorda plate is the southernpart of the Juan de releaseof eachof theearthquakes is as follows: 4.0 x 1019Nm in Fuca plate, south of the Blanco Fracture Zone. In order to the first 10 s for themainshock, 0.7 x 1019Nm in the first 8 s for explain the spaceproblem betweenthe Blanco FractureZone in the first aftershock,and 0.9 x 1019Nm in the first 2 s for the the north and the Mendocino Fault Zone in the south, Wilson second aftershock. These indicate that the mainshock and each of [1986] claimed that the Gorda plate is not a rigid plate and the aftershocksmay have different tectonicbackgrounds. The deforms internally. He called it the Gorda deformation zone bestdepth estimates of the mainshockand the two aftershocksare (GDZ). Seismicitystudies by Smithand Knapp [1980] andSmith 14 km, 18 km, and 24 km, respectively.The slip directionof the eta/. [ 1993] alsosupported this hypothesis. mainshockis betweenN75øE andN80øE. This slip directionis The potentialfor a largeinterplate earthquake in the Cascadia not consistent with either the relative motion of the North subductionzone (CSZ) where the Juan de Fuca plate or GDZ Americanand Juan de Fucaplates (N60øE) or betweenthe North subductsbeneath the North American plate has been debated. Americanplate and the Gordadeformation zone (N40øE).It has The CSZ possessesmany featuresof typical subduction,zones been suggestedthat the North American-Pacificplate motion is includingan active volcanicarc and accretionaryprism. On the accommodatedby right-lateralslip on both the San Andreasand basisof comparativesubductology [Uyeda, 1982], Heaton and Maacama-RodgersCreek-Hayward fault systems;the intervening Kanamori [1984] argued that CSZ is capable of great block is the Humboldtplate. If we modify the relativemotion of earthquakes.Geological studies seem to offer strongevidence for the southernmost Gorda deformation zone to conform with the greatearthquakes in CSZ [Adams, 1990; Atwater, 1992; Atwater seismicitytrends and allow the Humboldt-Pacificplate motion to et al., 1995]. On the otherhand, it hasbeen essentially aseismic be about half the total North American-Pacific motion, then the through recorded history; there has not been a single verified Gorda deformation zone-Humboldt relative motion matches the underthrustingearthquake. directionof the Peta'oliaslip vector.Also, the mixture of focal The tectonicsof the CapeMendocino region is complex.First, mechanisms in the two distinct aftershock clusters can be the locationof the San Andreasfault (SAF) in this region is not explained by motion between the Gorda deformation zone and well known becausethere is little seismicactivity (Figure 1) and Pacificplate and the Humboldtand North Americanplates. The the fault is coveredby thick sedimentsalong the coast.Second, Gorda deformationzone is subductingbeneath the Humboldt on the eastern side of SAF, several active faults exist and are plate in the Cape Mendocinoarea, and the Petroliaearthquake parallel to the SAF [Herd and Helley, 1977; Hill et al., 1990]. ruptured the entire subduction segment between the Gorda These are called the Garberville-Maacama-Rodgers Creek- deformationzone andHumboldt plate. Hayward fault zone (GMRH). Seismicity on the GMRH fault zone is much more active than the S^F in this region. The continuationof this GMRH fault systemextends into the Cape Introduction Mendocinoregion. Herd [1978] suggestedthat thesefaults form the easternboundary of a Humboldt plate which is boundedon An earthquakewith Ms 7.1 occurrednear Cape Mendocino on the west by S^F and on the north by GDZ. Prescott and Yu April 25, 1992. The origin time and location given by the [1986], Griscom and Jachens [1989], and Smith et al. [1993] NationalEarthquake Information Center (NEIC) are 18:06:05.25 discussedvarious aspectsof the eastwardstepping of the S^F. (Greenwich mean time (GMT)), 40ø19.94'N, 124ø13.70'W. The Third, the region north of the Cape Mendocino region is the mainshockepicenter is near the town of Petrolia, Californiai It accretionaryprism of the CSZ, with rising anticlinesthat are wasfollowed by two large(both Ms 6.6) aftershocksthe next day underlainedby active thrusts and high angle reverse faults (April 26). The NEIC parametersof the first aftershock(AF1) [Kelseyand Carver, 1988; Clark, 1992]. The orientationof these are origin time 7:41:40.0 (GMT); location, 40ø26.12'N, anticlinesand faultsis E-W to SE-NW near the Cape Mendocino region. In thispaper, we reportour analysisof teleseismicsurface and Copyright1995 by the AlnericanGeophysical Union. body waves to determine the source parametersof the 1992 earthquakesequence. We will then show that the mainshockhas Paper number95TC01975. the characteristicsof a subductionearthquake between the GDZ 0278 -7407/95/95TC-01975 $10.00 and the Humboldt plate. The tectonicsof the Cape Mendocino 1095 1096 TANIOKAET AL.: SEISMOTECTONICSOF1992 PETROLIA EARTHQUAKE 50 41 45 NA 40 z 40 ß' 120 Petrolia Eq. oi.. I Southern edge of ß I. I GoFJGSlab I I Pacific I ?, Ocean I I Focal Depths + <15.0 km 39 • >15.0 km Point Arena AF + ß 4, ß 50 km x"• GVF 125 124 123 longitude, w Figure1. Seismicityof northernCalifornia for 1980-1991time period after Castillo and Ellsworth [ 1993]. Stars arethe epicenters of the 1992Petrolia main shock and two largeaftershocks, AF1 andAF2. The dashedline is thesurface projection of thesouthern edge of theGorda slab after Jachens and Griscom [ 1983]. Inset map shows theentire Cascadia subduction zone with plate boundaries. Abbreviations are BSF, Bartlett Springs fault; CSZ, Cascadiasubduction zone; GDZ, Gorda deformation zone; GF, Garberville fault; GVF, Green Valley fault; HBF, Healdsburgfault; JDF, Juande Fucaplate; LMF, Lake Mountainfault; MF, Maacamafault; MFZ, Mendocino faultzone; NA, NorthAmerican plate; PAC, Pacific plate; and SAF, San Andreas fault. region,as we mentionedabove, can be well explainedby theslip periodsurface waves recorded at 15 stationsof GlobalDigital directionand aftershock distribution of thePetrolia earthquake. SeismographNetworks (GDSN), IncorporatedResearch Institute for Seismology(IRIS), and GEOSCOPE networks.The station parameters are shown in Table 1. The inversion was canied out Mechanism of the Mainshock in thetime domain on thefiltered records (period range from 50 s to 300 s). The depth is fixed at 15 km. The doublecouple We performed centroid moment tensor (CMT) inversion solutions of the moment tensor are shown in Table 2 as well as in [Dziewonskiet al., 1981'Fukushirna et al., 1989]using very long Figure 2. The mechanismis a thrusttype, with a shallowdip TANIOKA ET AL.: SEISMOTECTONICS OF 1992 PETROLlA EARTHQUAKE 1097 Table 1. Station Parmneters Station Azimuth, Distance, Mainshock Aftersl•ck 1 Aftersl•ck 2 Name deg deg CMT Body CMT Body CMT Body Wave Wave Wave ALE 9.1 46.7 P ANMO 105.4 14.9 x x x BDF 110.7 89.8 BJI 317.8 83.0 CHU 301.5 71.9 COL 338.7 28.2 x x COR 7.1 4.3 x x ERM 305.6 66.3 P s P GSC 128.7 7.6 x x x GUMO 281.1 82.2 x P HKY 301.7 72.8 P HRV 69.0 38.9 x P s x P x P s ISA 134.7 6.4 x x x KIP 247.1 34.4 P s KIV 9.6 95.3 P KMI 317.6 101.7 x P KONO 22.6 73.3 x P x P x LZH 323.0 92.2 x P NNA 129.2 67.9 P MAJO 303.3 72.6 x P x P x P OBN 10.8 82.6 P P PAS 140.8 7.7 x x x PPT 207.7 62.3 P RAR 215.5 69.7 x SBC 148.1 6.8 x x x SCP 148.1 34.8 P P s SNZO 221.9 98.4 P SSB 33.8 83.1 P TKO 302.0 72.4 P TOL 42.1 83.3 x P ZOBO 125.1 76.6 P Note that azimuthand distanceare for the mainshock.The symbolX representsthe station which we usedfor CMT inversion.The symbolsPans S representthe stationswhich we usedfor P wave andS wave. CMT is the centroid moment tensor. angle of 11ø and a strike of 342ø. The seismicmoment from the dip angle.On the otherhand, body wave analysisoffers a better CMT inversionis 4.9 x 1019Nm. controlon the dip anglebut lesscontrol on the stxike.From the In the case of a shallow thrust event, surface wave analysis CMT inversionwe fixed the strikeof the fault planeat 342ø and constrainsthe strike of the focal planesbut poorly determinesthe performedthe body wave inversionto find the dip anglesand Table 2. Source Parameters of Mainshock and Aftershocks Mainshock Aftershock 1 Aftershock 2 CMT Strike 342 ø / 144 ø 32 ø / 296 ø 36 ø / 127 ø Dip 11o / 79ø 62ø / 79ø 80ø / 85ø Rake 107 ø /87 ø 13 ø / 152 ø -6 ø/-169 ø Mo 4.9x 1019Nm 0.9x 1019Nm 1.3x 1019Nm Mw 7.1 6.6 6.7 Non-DC 12 % 5 % 1% Centroid time 12.3 s 6.0 s 4.4 s Body wave Depth 14 km 18km 24 km or deeper Strike 342ø(fixed)/170ø 212ø /116 ø (fixed) 216ø/307 ø (fixed) Dip 20ø / 70ø 74ø / 70ø 70ø / 87ø Rake 83 ø /93 ø 21 ø / 163 ø -3 ø/-160 ø Mo 4.0x 1019Nm 0.7 x 1019Nm 0.9x 1019Nm Duration 10 s 8 s 1.6 s Localstress drop 50 bar 20bar 2,800bar CMT is centroid moment tensor 1098 TANIOKA ET AL.: SEISMOTECTONICS OF 1992 PETROLlA EARTHQUAKE Mainshock a) Initial deth estimate using CMT solution O ........
Recommended publications
  • Seismicity, Seismotectonics and Preliminary Earthquake Hazard Analysis of the Teton Region, WY
    FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT DEVELOPMENT OF EARTHQUAKE GROUND SHAKING HAZARD MAPS FOR THE YELLOWSTONE- JACKSON HOLE-STAR VALLEY, WYOMING Submitted to the U.S. Geological Survey Under the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program Program Element II Evaluate Urban Hazard and Risk USGS Award 05HQGR0026 Prepared by Bonnie Jean Pickering White Department of Geology and Geophysics The University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT 94112 and Robert B. Smith Department of Geology and Geophysics The University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT 94112 Principal Investigator Ivan Wong Seismic Hazards Group URS Corporation 1333 Broadway, Suite 800, Oakland, CA 94612 Phone: (510) 874-3014, Fax: (510) 874-3268 E-mail: [email protected] 26 September 2006 __________________________ This research was supported by the U. S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department of the Interior, under USGS Award Number 05HQGR0026. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied of the U.S. Government. PREFACE The Yellowstone-Jackson Hole-Star Valley corridor is located within the seismically and tectonically active Intermountain Seismic Belt in westernmost Wyoming and eastern Idaho. The corridor has the highest seismic hazard in the Intermountain U.S. based on the U.S. Geological Survey’s National Hazard Maps. The region contains the heavily visited Yellowstone and Teton National Parks and the rapidly growing areas of Jackson Hole and Star Valley. Although there has only been one large earthquake in this region in historical times (1959 moment magnitude [M] 7.5 Hebgen Lake), abundant geologic evidence exists for the past occurrence of surface-faulting earthquakes of M 7 or greater.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 the Evolution of Seismic Monitoring Systems at the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory
    Characteristics of Hawaiian Volcanoes Editors: Michael P. Poland, Taeko Jane Takahashi, and Claire M. Landowski U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1801, 2014 Chapter 2 The Evolution of Seismic Monitoring Systems at the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory By Paul G. Okubo1, Jennifer S. Nakata1, and Robert Y. Koyanagi1 Abstract the Island of Hawai‘i. Over the past century, thousands of sci- entific reports and articles have been published in connection In the century since the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory with Hawaiian volcanism, and an extensive bibliography has (HVO) put its first seismographs into operation at the edge of accumulated, including numerous discussions of the history of Kīlauea Volcano’s summit caldera, seismic monitoring at HVO HVO and its seismic monitoring operations, as well as research (now administered by the U.S. Geological Survey [USGS]) has results. From among these references, we point to Klein and evolved considerably. The HVO seismic network extends across Koyanagi (1980), Apple (1987), Eaton (1996), and Klein and the entire Island of Hawai‘i and is complemented by stations Wright (2000) for details of the early growth of HVO’s seismic installed and operated by monitoring partners in both the USGS network. In particular, the work of Klein and Wright stands and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The out because their compilation uses newspaper accounts and seismic data stream that is available to HVO for its monitoring other reports of the effects of historical earthquakes to extend of volcanic and seismic activity in Hawai‘i, therefore, is built Hawai‘i’s detailed seismic history to nearly a century before from hundreds of data channels from a diverse collection of instrumental monitoring began at HVO.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismotectonics of the Zagros (Iran) from Orogen-Wide Earthquake Relocations
    Final Project Report, NSF Award 1524815 Seismotectonics of the Zagros (Iran) from orogen-wide earthquake relocations Edwin Nissen1;2 & Ezgi Karas¨ozen2 1 School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada 2 Department of Geophysics, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 03/15/2016{02/28/2019 Note: this final report is modifed and abridged from our recent paper: Karas¨ozen,E., Nissen, E., Bergman, E. A., and Ghods, A. (2019). Seismotectonics of the Zagros (Iran) From Orogen-Wide, Calibrated Earthquake Relocations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB017336. This related paper was also supported directly through this NSF award: Nissen, E., Ghods, A., Karas¨ozen,E., Elliott, J. R., Barnhart, W. D., Bergman, E. A., Hayes, G. P., Jamal-Reyhani, M., Nemati, M., Tan, F., Abdulnaby, W., Benz, H. M., Shahvar, M. P., Talebian, M., and Chen, L. (2019). The 12 November 2017 Mw 7.3 Ezgeleh-Sarpolzahab (Iran) earthquake and active tectonics of the Lurestan arc. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 124, 2124-2152. Summary We use calibrated earthquake relocations to reassess the distribution and kinematics of faulting in the Zagros range, southwestern Iran. This is amongst the most seismically-active fold-and- thrust belts globally, but knowledge of its active faulting is hampered by large errors in reported epicenters and controversy over earthquake depths. Mapped coseismic surface faulting is extremely rare, with most seismicity occurring on blind reverse faults buried beneath or within a thick, folded sedimentary cover. Therefore, the distribution of earthquakes provides vital information about the location of active faulting at depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Nazca Plate Region) GRENADA 80°W 60°W 40°W 11900900 a A' 1 1 1 2 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 BARBADOS Compiled by Gavin P
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OPEN-FILE REPORT 2015–1031-E U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY This report supplements Open-File Report 2010–1083-E 80°W 70°W 60°W 50°W PRE-INSTRUMENTAL SEISMICITY 1500 – 1899 SAINT LUCIA Seismicity of the Earth 1900–2013 BARBADOS Deaths, tsunami, MMI VIII+, or M 8 SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES HONDURAS M 8.5 labeled with year ARUBA CURAÇAO Seismotectonics of South America (Nazca Plate Region) GRENADA 80°W 60°W 40°W 11900900 A A' 1 1 1 2 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 BARBADOS Compiled by Gavin P. Hayes, Gregory M. Smoczyk, Harley M. Benz, Antonio Villaseñor, TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CURAÇAO NICARAGUA Barranquilla Maracaibo Caracas HONDURAS GRENADA 3 Valencia Maracay Demerara Plain and Kevin P. Furlong Cartagena TRENCH AXIS Managua Barquisimeto NICARAGUA 19921992 0 2014 11950950 Clark Basin 10° COSTA RICA PANAMA 1U.S. Geological Survey VENEZUELA 2 GUYANA Institute of Earth Sciences, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, (CSIC), Barcelona, Spain COSTA RICA Panama FRENCH 3Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa., USA San Jose Cucuta VENEZUELA SURINAME GUIANA 10°N 11983983 PANAMA –200 COLOMBIA Bucaramanga TECTONIC SUMMARY 19341934 GUYANA Equator The South American arc extends over 7,000 kilometers (km), from the Chilean margin triple junction offshore of southern Chile, to Medellin Equator ECUADOR its intersection with the Panama fracture zone, offshore of the southern coast of Panama in Central America. It marks the plate –400 Manizales FRENCH boundary between the subducting Nazca plate and the South America plate, where the oceanic crust and lithosphere of the Nazca Bogota SURINAME PROFILE A plate begin their descent into the mantle beneath South America.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismotectonics of the Algarve Region (Onshore Area) Dias, R
    Seismotectonics of the Algarve Region (onshore area) Dias, R. P.; Cabral, J. & Ressurreição, R. The Algarve is the southernmost area of Portugal mainland, corresponding to the region in the Portuguese territory closest to the Azores-Gibraltar plate boundary zone, between the Nubian and the Eurasian plates. At this longitude, this plate boundary corresponds to a wide, E-W trending, dextral transpressive deformation zone associated with oblique convergence of the plates (Rosas et al., 2008; Zitellini et al., 2009) at approximately 4mm/yr in the NW-SE direction. This tectonic setting is responsible for significant seismicity and regional tectonic activity which are evidenced by numerous earthquakes and by Pliocene to Pleistocene deformation, presenting a scenario of important seismogenic potential (Dias & Cabral, 2000; Dias, 2001; Terrinha et al., 1998). The seismic activity is expressed by important historical and instrumental events, being located at the northern edge of a broad belt of seismicity that extends approximately from the Straits of Gibraltar to the Gorringe submarine ridge (1755 Lisbon earthquake, M = 8.5; 1969 Horseshoe Abyssal Plain earthquake, MS = 8) and also near the littoral and onshore (1719 Portimão earthquake, IMM max. IX; 1722 Tavira earthquake, IMM max. X; 1856 Loulé earthquake, IMM max. VIII and a scattered low magnitude instrumental seismicity) (Carrilho et al., 1997, Carrilho, 2005). However, the earthquake activity does not propagate significantly inland, suggesting the presence of submarine geologic structures that absorb an important part of the Iberia-Nubia interplate deformation (Dias, 2001; Dias & Cabral, 2002; Dias et al., 2004). The particular location of Algarve in the plate tectonics framework explains the significant neotectonic activity, intended as the tectonic activity from the Upper Pliocene to the Present.
    [Show full text]
  • Course: Seismotectonics
    COURSE: SEISMOTECTONICS ACADEMIC YEAR: 2017-2018 TYPE OF EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY: (Basic, Characterizing, Affine, Free choice, Other) TEACHER: FILIPPOS VALLIANATOS e-mail: [email protected] website: phone: mobile (optional): Language:English ECTS: (lessons e n. of hours: (lessons e Campus:Potenza/Matera Semester: 1st tutorials/practice) 6 tutorials/practice) 56 Dept./School: Potenza Program: Laurea Magistrale Internationale in Geoscienze e Georisorse EDUCATIONAL GOALS AND EXPECTED LEARNING OUTCOMES Knowledge The course aims to provide an understanding of the dynamics of the solid Earth from theoretical and observational seismology and seismotectonics in relation to earthquake hazard and mitigation. It provides an in-depth study of earthquake seismology and earthquake hazard covering the following topics: Propagation of Seismic Waves; Earthquake Source Mechanics; Crustal Tectonics; Statistics of Earthquake. This is a geophysics based course, which covers the breadth of traditional seismology, developed from the seismic wave equation, and the physics of the earthquake source. The course covers fault mechanics, seismotectonics and earthquake statistics Skills and Abilities The aim of the course is students to gain knowledge and understanding seismotectonics based on fundamental geophysics of the seismic wave propagation and earthquake mechanics, in relation to earthquake hazard and mitigation. The course provides students with the mathematical and physical underpinning of the subject. The students will acquire the following practical
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Coastal Geomorphology and Evolution of Tierra Del Fuego
    Geologica Acta: an international earth science journal ISSN: 1695-6133 [email protected] Universitat de Barcelona España Bujalesky, G. G. Coastal geomorphology and evolution of Tierra del Fuego (Southern Argentina) Geologica Acta: an international earth science journal, vol. 5, núm. 4, 2007, pp. 337- 362 Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=50550407 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Geologica Acta, Vol.5, Nº 4, 2007, 337-362 Available online at www.geologica-acta.com Coastal geomorphology and evolution of Tierra del Fuego (Southern Argentina) G.G. BUJALESKY Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CONICET) Av. Houssay nº 200, V9410BFD Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The northeastern Atlantic coast and the Beagle Channel are significant geomorphological areas of Tierra del Fuego (Southern Argentina). The northeastern Atlantic coast is located at the extra Andean lowlands (South- American Plate Domain). This coast line undergoes a macrotidal regime and is exposed to high energy waves and intense westerly winds. Extensive and wide beaches and littoral forms are composed of gravel and coarse sand. This zone was a free-ice area since 1,8 Ma B.P. Glacigenic deposits were re-worked by litoral processes that formed gravel beaches during sea level highstands of the. During the Holocene (i.e. approximately 5,000 years B.P.) gravel barriers plugged the inner estuaries of the palaeoembayments These barriers suggest a relative sea level fall of 0.214 m each 1,000 years, but a portion of this gradient could be due to wave dynamics since greater set-up of the storm waves enters the embayments.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismotectonics of the Koyna-Warna Area, India
    Pure appl. geophys. 150 (1997) 511–550 0033–4553/97/040511–40 $ 1.50+0.20/0 Seismotectonics of the Koyna-Warna Area, India PRADEEP TALWANI1 Abstract—Reservoir-induced seismicity has been observed near Koyna Dam, India since the early 1960s. In order to understand the seismotectonics of the region we analyzed available seismicity data from 1963 to 1995. Over 300 earthquakes with M]3.0 were relocated using revised location parameters (station locations, velocity model, station delays and Vp /Vs ratio). The spatial pattern of earthquakes was integrated with available geological, geophysical, geomorphological data and observations following the M 6.3 earthquake in December 1967, to delineate and identify the geometry of seismogenic structures. From this integration we conclude that the area lying between Koyna and Warna Rivers can be divided into several seismogenic crustal blocks, underlain by a fluid-filled fracture zone. This zone lies between 6 and 13 km and is the location of the larger events (M]3.0). The seismicity is bounded to the west by the Koyna River fault zone (KRFZ) which dips steeply to the west. KRFZ lies along the N–S portion of the Koyna River and extends S10°W for at least 40 km. It was the location of the 1967 Koyna earthquake. The seismicity is bounded to the east by NE–SW trending Patan fault, which extends from Patan on the Koyna River, SW to near Ambole on the Warna River. Patan fault dips 45° to the NW and was the location of the M 5.4 earthquake in February 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismotectonics of the Explorer Region
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 107, NO. B10, 2208, doi:10.1029/2001JB000220, 2002 Seismotectonics of the Explorer region Jochen Braunmiller1 and John Na´beˇlek College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA Received 19 September 2001; revised 15 January 2002; accepted 20 January 2002; published 2 October 2002. [1] The Explorer region offshore western Canada is a tectonically complex area surrounded by the Pacific, North America, and Juan de Fuca plates. Existing tectonic models for the region differ fundamentally. Proposed plate configurations range from multiple independent plate fragments to an Explorer plate now fused to North America along the continental margin and cut by Pacific–North America transform faults in the west. We present new seismological data constraining the region’s current tectonics. We use three-component regional waveforms to determine the source parameters of 84 earthquakes with magnitude greater than 4. Combined with 34 Harvard centroid moment tensor solutions, they represent the region’s largest earthquake source parameter data set obtained by robust waveform modeling techniques. In addition, we perform joint epicenter determination to relocate larger earthquakes recorded since 1918. The source parameters and improved locations provide a consistent tectonic picture. Earthquake slip vector azimuths along the Pacific plate boundary change smoothly and are significantly less northerly oriented than the Pacific-North America plate motion direction, requiring an independent Explorer plate. The present-day Pacific-Explorer boundary is formed by transform faults subparallel to the Revere-Dellwood-Wilson fault. Plate motion vectors indicate that the Winona block is part of the Explorer plate. Current Explorer motion is more northerly than indicated by magnetic anomalies prior to 2 Ma, implying a recent change, possibly coinciding with a northwestward ridge jump near Explorer plate’s northern end transferring the Winona block from the Pacific to the Explorer plate.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismotectonics of the Northern Longitudinal Valley, Taiwan, Inferred from Aftershock Sequences of 2018 Mw6.4 and 2019 Mw6.2 Hualien Earthquakes
    EGU2020-21398 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-21398 EGU General Assembly 2020 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Seismotectonics of the northern Longitudinal Valley, Taiwan, inferred from aftershock sequences of 2018 Mw6.4 and 2019 Mw6.2 Hualien earthquakes Wei-Fang Sun1, Hao Kuo-Chen2, Zhuo-Kang Guan2, and Wen-Yen Chang1 1Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien, Taiwan 2Department of Earth Sciences, National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan In the Hualien area, two Mw6.4 and Mw6.2 earthquakes, 20 km apart, occurred in February 2018 and April 2019 respectively. The former to the northeast, located offshore to the Liwu river, triggered several earthquake clusters along the Milun fault and southward to the Longitudinal Valley, the suture of the Eurasian and the Philippine Sea plates; the latter to the southwest, located in the Central Range, also triggered several seismic swarms in the Central Range, along the Liwu river to the northeast and at Ji'an to the southeast. Except for the Milun fault, neither GPS nor InSAR observations detects significant surface deformation after the occurrence of these two main shocks, indicating that the earthquake ruptures mainly developed within the crust. Therefore, seismic observation becomes an efficient tool for revealing the seismotectonics of the two earthquake sequences. For monitoring the aftershock sequences, two days after the main shocks, we deployed two geophone arrays, 70 Z-component RefTek 125A TEXANs for two weeks in 2018 and 47 three-component Fairfield Nodal Z-Lands for one month in 2019, with 1-5 km station spacing around the Hualien City.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismotectonics of the Pamir
    Originally published as: Schurr, B., Ratschbacher, L., Sippel, J., Gloaguen, R., Yuan, X., Mechie, J. (2014): Seismotectonics of the Pamir. - Tectonics, 33, 8, p. 1501-1518 DOI: http://doi.org/10.1002/2014TC003576 PUBLICATIONS Tectonics RESEARCH ARTICLE Seismotectonics of the Pamir 10.1002/2014TC003576 Bernd Schurr1, Lothar Ratschbacher2, Christian Sippl1,3, Richard Gloaguen2,4, Xiaohui Yuan1, 1 Key Points: and James Mechie • New crustal seismicity, focal 1 2 mechanism data from local Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ, Potsdam, Germany, Institut für Geologie, Technische Universität Bergakademie network for the Pamir Freiberg, Freiberg, Germany, 3Now at Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, • New comprehensive neotectonic map Australia, 4Now at Helmholtz-Institut Freiberg für Ressourcentechnologie, Freiberg, Germany for the Pamir • Seismic deformation is dominated by N-S shortening and westward extrusion Abstract Based on a 2 year seismic record from a local network, we characterize the deformation of the seismogenic crust of the Pamir in the northwestern part of the India-Asia collision zone. We located more Supporting Information: than 6000 upper crustal earthquakes in a regional 3-D velocity model. For 132 of these events, we determined • Readme • Table S1 source mechanisms, mostly through full waveform moment tensor inversion of locally and regionally • Table S2 recorded seismograms. We also produced a new and comprehensive neotectonic map of the Pamir, which • Figure S1 we relate to the seismic deformation. Along Pamir’s northern margin, where GPS measurements show • Figure S2 fi fi • Figure S3 signi cant shortening, we nd thrust and dextral strike-slip faulting along west to northwest trending planes, indicating slip partitioning between northward thrusting and westward extrusion.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Seismotectonics of Sweden
    TECHNICAL REPORT 93-13 A review of the seismotectonics of Sweden Robert Muir Wood EQE International Ltd, Warrington, Cheshire, England April 1993 SVENSK KARNBRANSLEHANTERING AB SWEDISH NUCLEAR FUEL AND WASTE MANAGEMENT CO BOX 5864 S-102 48 STOCKHOLM TEL 08-665 28 00 TELEX 13108 SKB S TELEFAX 08-661 57 19 A REVIEW OF THE SEISMOTECTONICS OF SWEDEN Robert Muir Wood EQE International Ltä, Warrington, Cheshire, England April 1993 his report concerns a study which was conducted "Tor SKB. The conclusions and viewpoints presented in the report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily coincide with those of the client. Information on SKB technical reports from L977-1978 (TR 121), 1979 (TR 79-28), 1980 (TR 80-26), 1981 (TR 81-17), 1982 (TR 82-28), 1983 (TR 83-77), 1984 (TR 85-01), 1985 (TR 85-20), 1986 (TR 86-31), 1987 (TR 87-33), 1988 (TR 88-32), 1989 (TR 89-40), 1990 (TR 90-46) and 1991 (TR 91-64) is available through SKB. A REVIEW OF THE SEISMOTECTONICS OF SWEDEN Robert Muir Wood EQE International Ltd 500 Longbarn Boulevard Birchwood Warrington WA2 OXF Cheshire England April 1993 (With contributions from Ove Stephansson, Rutger Wahlström and Ronald Arvidsson) Keywords: Sweden, seismotectonics, seismicity, deglaciation, postglacial rebound, neotectonics, stress-field, strain-field. ABSTRACT A study has been undertaken of data relating to the seismotectonic state of Sweden, both under current conditions and also through the glaciation/deglaciation cycle. The focus of the study has been to explore primary data on all the separate sources of information bearing on seismotectonics including: a) regional tectonics; b) neotectonic surface faulting; c) geodetic and tide-gauge observations of land-level changes; d) the horizontal strain field; e) Holocene land-level changes; f) historical and instrumental seismicity; g) palaeoseismicity; h) stress determinations, and i) geothermal observations.
    [Show full text]