And Grand Overview
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Pharmacologic Considerations in the Disposition of Antibodies and Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Preclinical Models and in Patients
antibodies Review Pharmacologic Considerations in the Disposition of Antibodies and Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Preclinical Models and in Patients Andrew T. Lucas 1,2,3,*, Ryan Robinson 3, Allison N. Schorzman 2, Joseph A. Piscitelli 1, Juan F. Razo 1 and William C. Zamboni 1,2,3 1 University of North Carolina (UNC), Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; [email protected] (J.A.P.); [email protected] (J.F.R.); [email protected] (W.C.Z.) 2 Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; [email protected] 3 Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-919-966-5242; Fax: +1-919-966-5863 Received: 30 November 2018; Accepted: 22 December 2018; Published: 1 January 2019 Abstract: The rapid advancement in the development of therapeutic proteins, including monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), has created a novel mechanism to selectively deliver highly potent cytotoxic agents in the treatment of cancer. These agents provide numerous benefits compared to traditional small molecule drugs, though their clinical use still requires optimization. The pharmacology of mAbs/ADCs is complex and because ADCs are comprised of multiple components, individual agent characteristics and patient variables can affect their disposition. To further improve the clinical use and rational development of these agents, it is imperative to comprehend the complex mechanisms employed by antibody-based agents in traversing numerous biological barriers and how agent/patient factors affect tumor delivery, toxicities, efficacy, and ultimately, biodistribution. -
Dinutuximab for the Treatment of Pediatric Patients with High-Risk Neuroblastoma
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology ISSN: 1751-2433 (Print) 1751-2441 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ierj20 Dinutuximab for the treatment of pediatric patients with high-risk neuroblastoma Jaume Mora To cite this article: Jaume Mora (2016): Dinutuximab for the treatment of pediatric patients with high-risk neuroblastoma, Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology, DOI: 10.1586/17512433.2016.1160775 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/17512433.2016.1160775 Accepted author version posted online: 02 Mar 2016. Published online: 21 Mar 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 21 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ierj20 Download by: [Hospital Sant Joan de Deu], [Jaume Mora] Date: 30 March 2016, At: 23:12 EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/17512433.2016.1160775 DRUG PROFILE Dinutuximab for the treatment of pediatric patients with high-risk neuroblastoma Jaume Mora Department of Pediatric Onco-Hematology and Developmental Tumor Biology Laboratory, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Passeig Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common extra cranial solid tumor of childhood, with 60% of patients Received 14 December 2015 presenting with high risk (HR) NB by means of clinical, pathological and biological features. The 5-year Accepted 29 February 2016 survival rate for HR-NB remains below 40%, with the majority of patients suffering relapse from Published online chemorefractory tumor. Immunotherapy is the main strategy against minimal residual disease and 21 March 2016 clinical experience has mostly focused on monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) against the glycolipid dis- KEYWORDS ialoganglioside GD2. -
NINDS Custom Collection II
ACACETIN ACEBUTOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE ACECLIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE ACEMETACIN ACETAMINOPHEN ACETAMINOSALOL ACETANILIDE ACETARSOL ACETAZOLAMIDE ACETOHYDROXAMIC ACID ACETRIAZOIC ACID ACETYL TYROSINE ETHYL ESTER ACETYLCARNITINE ACETYLCHOLINE ACETYLCYSTEINE ACETYLGLUCOSAMINE ACETYLGLUTAMIC ACID ACETYL-L-LEUCINE ACETYLPHENYLALANINE ACETYLSEROTONIN ACETYLTRYPTOPHAN ACEXAMIC ACID ACIVICIN ACLACINOMYCIN A1 ACONITINE ACRIFLAVINIUM HYDROCHLORIDE ACRISORCIN ACTINONIN ACYCLOVIR ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE ADENOSINE ADRENALINE BITARTRATE AESCULIN AJMALINE AKLAVINE HYDROCHLORIDE ALANYL-dl-LEUCINE ALANYL-dl-PHENYLALANINE ALAPROCLATE ALBENDAZOLE ALBUTEROL ALEXIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE ALLANTOIN ALLOPURINOL ALMOTRIPTAN ALOIN ALPRENOLOL ALTRETAMINE ALVERINE CITRATE AMANTADINE HYDROCHLORIDE AMBROXOL HYDROCHLORIDE AMCINONIDE AMIKACIN SULFATE AMILORIDE HYDROCHLORIDE 3-AMINOBENZAMIDE gamma-AMINOBUTYRIC ACID AMINOCAPROIC ACID N- (2-AMINOETHYL)-4-CHLOROBENZAMIDE (RO-16-6491) AMINOGLUTETHIMIDE AMINOHIPPURIC ACID AMINOHYDROXYBUTYRIC ACID AMINOLEVULINIC ACID HYDROCHLORIDE AMINOPHENAZONE 3-AMINOPROPANESULPHONIC ACID AMINOPYRIDINE 9-AMINO-1,2,3,4-TETRAHYDROACRIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE AMINOTHIAZOLE AMIODARONE HYDROCHLORIDE AMIPRILOSE AMITRIPTYLINE HYDROCHLORIDE AMLODIPINE BESYLATE AMODIAQUINE DIHYDROCHLORIDE AMOXEPINE AMOXICILLIN AMPICILLIN SODIUM AMPROLIUM AMRINONE AMYGDALIN ANABASAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE ANABASINE HYDROCHLORIDE ANCITABINE HYDROCHLORIDE ANDROSTERONE SODIUM SULFATE ANIRACETAM ANISINDIONE ANISODAMINE ANISOMYCIN ANTAZOLINE PHOSPHATE ANTHRALIN ANTIMYCIN A (A1 shown) ANTIPYRINE APHYLLIC -
Federal Register Notice 5-1-2020 Pdf Icon[PDF – 358
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 85 / Friday, May 1, 2020 / Notices 25439 confidential by the respondent (5 U.S.C. schedules. Other than examination DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 552(b)(4)). reports, it provides the only financial HUMAN SERVICES Current actions: The Board has data available for these corporations. temporarily revised the instructions to The Federal Reserve is solely Centers for Disease Control and the FR Y–9C report to accurately reflect responsible for authorizing, supervising, Prevention the revised definition of ‘‘savings and assigning ratings to Edges. The [CDC–2020–0046; NIOSH–233–C] deposits’’ in accordance with the Federal Reserve uses the data collected amendments to Regulation D in the on the FR 2886b to identify present and Hazardous Drugs: Draft NIOSH List of interim final rule published on April 28, potential problems and monitor and Hazardous Drugs in Healthcare 2020 (85 FR 23445). Specifically, the develop a better understanding of Settings, 2020; Procedures; and Risk Board has temporarily revised the activities within the industry. Management Information instructions on the FR Y–9C, Schedule HC–E, items 1(b), 1(c), 2(c) and glossary Legal authorization and AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and content to remove the transfer or confidentiality: Sections 25 and 25A of Prevention, HHS. withdrawal limit. As a result of the the Federal Reserve Act authorize the ACTION: Notice and request for comment. revision, if a depository institution Federal Reserve to collect the FR 2886b chooses to suspend enforcement of the (12 U.S.C. 602, 625). The obligation to SUMMARY: The National Institute for six transfer limit on a ‘‘savings deposit,’’ report this information is mandatory. -
Individualized Systems Medicine Strategy to Tailor Treatments for Patients with Chemorefractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Published OnlineFirst September 20, 2013; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0350 RESEARCH ARTICLE Individualized Systems Medicine Strategy to Tailor Treatments for Patients with Chemorefractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Tea Pemovska 1 , Mika Kontro 2 , Bhagwan Yadav 1 , Henrik Edgren 1 , Samuli Eldfors1 , Agnieszka Szwajda 1 , Henrikki Almusa 1 , Maxim M. Bespalov 1 , Pekka Ellonen 1 , Erkki Elonen 2 , Bjørn T. Gjertsen5 , 6 , Riikka Karjalainen 1 , Evgeny Kulesskiy 1 , Sonja Lagström 1 , Anna Lehto 1 , Maija Lepistö1 , Tuija Lundán 3 , Muntasir Mamun Majumder 1 , Jesus M. Lopez Marti 1 , Pirkko Mattila 1 , Astrid Murumägi 1 , Satu Mustjoki 2 , Aino Palva 1 , Alun Parsons 1 , Tero Pirttinen 4 , Maria E. Rämet 4 , Minna Suvela 1 , Laura Turunen 1 , Imre Västrik 1 , Maija Wolf 1 , Jonathan Knowles 1 , Tero Aittokallio 1 , Caroline A. Heckman 1 , Kimmo Porkka 2 , Olli Kallioniemi 1 , and Krister Wennerberg 1 ABSTRACT We present an individualized systems medicine (ISM) approach to optimize cancer drug therapies one patient at a time. ISM is based on (i) molecular profi ling and ex vivo drug sensitivity and resistance testing (DSRT) of patients’ cancer cells to 187 oncology drugs, (ii) clinical implementation of therapies predicted to be effective, and (iii) studying consecutive samples from the treated patients to understand the basis of resistance. Here, application of ISM to 28 samples from patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) uncovered fi ve major taxonomic drug-response sub- types based on DSRT profi les, some with distinct genomic features (e.g., MLL gene fusions in subgroup IV and FLT3 -ITD mutations in subgroup V). Therapy based on DSRT resulted in several clinical responses. -
Association of Oral Anticoagulants and Proton Pump Inhibitor Cotherapy with Hospitalization for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding
Supplementary Online Content Ray WA, Chung CP, Murray KT, et al. Association of oral anticoagulants and proton pump inhibitor cotherapy with hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.17242 eAppendix. PPI Co-therapy and Anticoagulant-Related UGI Bleeds This supplementary material has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 10/02/2021 Appendix: PPI Co-therapy and Anticoagulant-Related UGI Bleeds Table 1A Exclusions: end-stage renal disease Diagnosis or procedure code for dialysis or end-stage renal disease outside of the hospital 28521 – anemia in ckd 5855 – Stage V , ckd 5856 – end stage renal disease V451 – Renal dialysis status V560 – Extracorporeal dialysis V561 – fitting & adjustment of extracorporeal dialysis catheter 99673 – complications due to renal dialysis CPT-4 Procedure Codes 36825 arteriovenous fistula autogenous gr 36830 creation of arteriovenous fistula; 36831 thrombectomy, arteriovenous fistula without revision, autogenous or 36832 revision of an arteriovenous fistula, with or without thrombectomy, 36833 revision, arteriovenous fistula; with thrombectomy, autogenous or nonaut 36834 plastic repair of arteriovenous aneurysm (separate procedure) 36835 insertion of thomas shunt 36838 distal revascularization & interval ligation, upper extremity 36840 insertion mandril 36845 anastomosis mandril 36860 cannula declotting; 36861 cannula declotting; 36870 thrombectomy, percutaneous, arteriovenous -
Update in Pediatric Oncology Pediatric Leukemia
9/21/2016 Objectives • Review newest therapies in pediatric oncology • Discuss the use of Blinatumomab in pediatric Update in Pediatric Oncology patients • Review Car T‐Cell immunotherapy in pediatric Katie Bruce, PharmD, BCPPS patients Pharmacy Clinical Specialist • Discuss the latest therapy approved for use in Pediatric Oncology and BMT The Children’s Hospital at TriStar neuroblastoma Centennial Disclosure • I have no financial conflicts to disclose Pediatric Leukemia Pediatric Leukemia Classification • Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most • Over 85% of childhood ALL is B‐cell ALL common cancer in children ▫ Most commonly precursor‐B cell ALL ▫ Accounts for ~30% of all cancers 2% mature B‐cell ALL ▫ 3000 new cases in US each year ▫ 15% T‐cell ALL (Birth –21 years old) Investigating use of nelarabine and/or high dose methotrexate ~ 80% are ALL and ~20% are AML ▫ Incidence of 3.4 cases per 100,000 • Risk Criteria ▫ Most common between 2 and 5 years old ▫ Initial WBC count ▫ Boys > girls ▫ Age • Higher incidence in Caucasians and Hispanics vs. African ▫ Cytogenetics American Children ▫ Immunologic subtype www.curesearch.org www.curesearch.org 1 9/21/2016 Risk Stratification Outcomes • ~85% overall 5‐year event‐free survival ▫ 90 –95 % in low‐ or standard‐risk pre‐B ALL with good response to induction chemotherapy ▫ 75 –85 % in high‐risk with good early response ▫ <75% in very high‐risk (Ph+, hypodiploid, CNS3) or slow response to chemo • T‐cell ALL survival lower at 70 –75 % • Infant ALL ▫ Poor prognosis with 10‐30% event‐free -
Qarziba, INN-Dinutuximab Beta
ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS 1 This medicinal product is subject to additional monitoring. This will allow quick identification of new safety information. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions. See section 4.8 for how to report adverse reactions. 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT Qarziba 4.5 mg/mL concentrate for solution for infusion 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION 1 mL of concentrate contains 4.5 mg dinutuximab beta. Each vial contains 20 mg dinutuximab beta in 4.5 mL. Dinutuximab beta is a mouse-human chimeric monoclonal IgG1 antibody produced in a mammalian cell line (CHO) by recombinant DNA technology. For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Concentrate for solution for infusion Clear, colourless liquid. 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications Qarziba is indicated for the treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma in patients aged 12 months and above, who have previously received induction chemotherapy and achieved at least a partial response, followed by myeloablative therapy and stem cell transplantation, as well as patients with history of relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma, with or without residual disease. Prior to the treatment of relapsed neuroblastoma, any actively progressing disease should be stabilised by other suitable measures. In patients with a history of relapsed/refractory disease and in patients who have not achieved a complete response after first line therapy, Qarziba should be combined with interleukin-2 (IL-2). 4.2 Posology and method of administration Qarziba is restricted to hospital-use only and must be administered under the supervision of a physician experienced in the use of oncological therapies. -
High Risk Therapy Made Easy: Supporting High Risk Patients Through Complex Therapy
8/21/2018 High Risk Therapy Made Easy: Supporting high risk patients through complex therapy Lori Ranney, MSN, APRN, CPNP, CPHON Mylynda Livingston, MSN, APRN, AC PC-PNP, CPON Teresa Herriage, DNP, APRN, CPNP, CPHON Children’s Minnesota Disclaimers and Confidentiality Protections Children’s Minnesota makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the content. Content is provided “as is” and is for informational use only. It is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Children’s disclaims all warranties, express or implied, statutory or otherwise, including without limitation the implied warranties of merchantability, non-infringement of third parties’ rights, and fitness for a particular purpose. This content was developed for use in Children’s patient care environment and may not be suitable for use in other patient care environments. Children’s does not endorse, certify, or assess third parties’ competency. You hold all responsibility for your use or nonuse of the content. Children’s shall not be liable for claims, losses, or damages arising from or related to any use or misuse of the content. This content and its related discussions are privileged and confidential under Minnesota’s peer review statute (Minn. Stat. § 145.61 et. seq.). Do not disclose unless appropriately authorized. Notwithstanding the foregoing, content may be subject to copyright or trademark law; use of such information requires Children’s permission. This content may include patient protected health information. You agree to comply with all applicable state and federal laws protecting patient privacy and security including the Minnesota Health Records Act and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and its implementing regulations as amended from time to time. -
Phenotype-Based Drug Screening Reveals Association Between Venetoclax Response and Differentiation Stage in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Acute Myeloid Leukemia SUPPLEMENTARY APPENDIX Phenotype-based drug screening reveals association between venetoclax response and differentiation stage in acute myeloid leukemia Heikki Kuusanmäki, 1,2 Aino-Maija Leppä, 1 Petri Pölönen, 3 Mika Kontro, 2 Olli Dufva, 2 Debashish Deb, 1 Bhagwan Yadav, 2 Oscar Brück, 2 Ashwini Kumar, 1 Hele Everaus, 4 Bjørn T. Gjertsen, 5 Merja Heinäniemi, 3 Kimmo Porkka, 2 Satu Mustjoki 2,6 and Caroline A. Heckman 1 1Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, Helsinki Institute of Life Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki; 2Hematology Research Unit, Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki; 3Institute of Biomedicine, School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland; 4Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia; 5Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, De - partment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway and 6Translational Immunology Research Program and Department of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland ©2020 Ferrata Storti Foundation. This is an open-access paper. doi:10.3324/haematol. 2018.214882 Received: December 17, 2018. Accepted: July 8, 2019. Pre-published: July 11, 2019. Correspondence: CAROLINE A. HECKMAN - [email protected] HEIKKI KUUSANMÄKI - [email protected] Supplemental Material Phenotype-based drug screening reveals an association between venetoclax response and differentiation stage in acute myeloid leukemia Authors: Heikki Kuusanmäki1, 2, Aino-Maija -
Pharmaceuticals As Environmental Contaminants
PharmaceuticalsPharmaceuticals asas EnvironmentalEnvironmental Contaminants:Contaminants: anan OverviewOverview ofof thethe ScienceScience Christian G. Daughton, Ph.D. Chief, Environmental Chemistry Branch Environmental Sciences Division National Exposure Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development Environmental Protection Agency Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 [email protected] Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada Why and how do drugs contaminate the environment? What might it all mean? How do we prevent it? Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada This talk presents only a cursory overview of some of the many science issues surrounding the topic of pharmaceuticals as environmental contaminants Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada A Clarification We sometimes loosely (but incorrectly) refer to drugs, medicines, medications, or pharmaceuticals as being the substances that contaminant the environment. The actual environmental contaminants, however, are the active pharmaceutical ingredients – APIs. These terms are all often used interchangeably Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada Office of Research and Development Available: http://www.epa.gov/nerlesd1/chemistry/pharma/image/drawing.pdfNational -
Antibodies for the Treatment of Brain Metastases, a Dream Or a Reality?
pharmaceutics Review Antibodies for the Treatment of Brain Metastases, a Dream or a Reality? Marco Cavaco, Diana Gaspar, Miguel ARB Castanho * and Vera Neves * Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.A.R.B.C.); [email protected] (V.N.) Received: 19 November 2019; Accepted: 28 December 2019; Published: 13 January 2020 Abstract: The incidence of brain metastases (BM) in cancer patients is increasing. After diagnosis, overall survival (OS) is poor, elicited by the lack of an effective treatment. Monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based therapy has achieved remarkable success in treating both hematologic and non-central-nervous system (CNS) tumors due to their inherent targeting specificity. However, the use of mAbs in the treatment of CNS tumors is restricted by the blood–brain barrier (BBB) that hinders the delivery of either small-molecules drugs (sMDs) or therapeutic proteins (TPs). To overcome this limitation, active research is focused on the development of strategies to deliver TPs and increase their concentration in the brain. Yet, their molecular weight and hydrophilic nature turn this task into a challenge. The use of BBB peptide shuttles is an elegant strategy. They explore either receptor-mediated transcytosis (RMT) or adsorptive-mediated transcytosis (AMT) to cross the BBB. The latter is preferable since it avoids enzymatic degradation, receptor saturation, and competition with natural receptor substrates, which reduces adverse events. Therefore, the combination of mAbs properties (e.g., selectivity and long half-life) with BBB peptide shuttles (e.g., BBB translocation and delivery into the brain) turns the therapeutic conjugate in a valid approach to safely overcome the BBB and efficiently eliminate metastatic brain cells.