February Challenge Complete Alphabetical List

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

February Challenge Complete Alphabetical List February Challenge Complete Alphabetical List Acorn Woodpecker Chestnut-headedOropendola Evening Grosbeak African Gray Hornbill Chipping Sparrow Fischer's Lovebird Allen's Hummingbird Clay-colored Thrush Fish Crow American Crow Coal Tit Flame-rumped tanager American Goldfinch Collared Aracari Galah American Robin Common Buzzard Golden-hooded tanager American Tree Sparrow Common Bronzewing Gray Catbird American White Pelican Common Bulbul (Dark- Gray-cowled Wood-Rail American Wigeon capped) Gray-headed Chachalaca Anna's Hummingbird Common Chaffinch Gray-headed Woodpecker Arrow-marked Babbler Common Grackle Gray heron Australian King Parrot Common Myna Great Blue heron Australian Magpie Common Ostrich Great Egret Bald Eagle Common Redpoll Greater Roadrunner Baltimore Oriole Common Raven Great Horned Owl Barn Owl Common Wood Pigeon Great Spotted Woodpecker Bermuda Petrel Cooper's Hawk Green Hermit Bewick's Wren Crested Pigeon Green Woodhoopoe Black-billed Magpie Crested Tit Great Tit Black-capped Chickadee Crimson-backed tanager Hadada Ibis Black-chested Jay Crimson Rosella Hairy Woodpecker Black-collared Barbet Cut-throat Hawfinch Black-crested Titmouse Dark-eyed Junco Herring Gull Blacksmith Lapwing Denham's Bustard Hoary Redpoll Black Vulture Diamond Dove House Finch Blue-capped Motmot Downy Woodpecker House Sparrow Blue-gray Gnatcatcher Dunnock Iberian Magpie Blue-gray Tanager Dusky-faced Tanager Japanese Grosbeak Blue Jay Eastern Bluebird Japanese Tit Blue Tit Eastern Screech-Owl Karoo Thrush Boat-tailed Grackle Eastern Phoebe Keel-billed Toucan Brambling Eastern Towhee Knob-billed Duck Brown Pelican Egyptian Goose Ladder-backed Woodpecker Brown Thrasher Eurasian Blackbird Laughing Dove Brown-eared Bulbul Eurasian Bullfinch Laughing Kookaburra Brown-headed Cowbird Eurasian Collared-Dove Lesser Spotted Woodpecker Brown-headed Nuthatch Eurasian Jackdaw Lillian's Lovebird Buff-throated Saltator Eurasian Jay Little Blue Heron Bushtit Eurasian Kestrel Little Corella Canada Goose Eurasian Magpie Long-eared Owl Canada Jay Eurasian Nuthatch Long-tailed Tit Cape Sparrow Eurasian Tree Sparrow Mallard Cape Starling Eurasian Siskin Middle Spotted Woodpecker Cape White-eye European Goldfinch Mountain Chickadee Carolina Chickadee European Robin Mountain Bluebird Carolina Wren European Greenfinch Mourning Dove Carrion Crow European Starling Noisy Miner Northern Cardinal Sandhill Crane Northern Flicker Shining Honeycreeper Northern Gray-headed Snowy-bellied Hummingbird Sparrow Snowy Egret Northern Harrier Song Sparrow Northern Mockingbird Song Thrush Northern Pintail Southern Boubou Northern Saw-whet owl Southern Masked Weaver Orange-crowned Warbler Speckled Mousebird Orange-billed Sparrow Speckled Pigeon Orchard Oriole Spotted Dove Oriental Greenfinch Spotted Towhee Oriental Turtle Dove Spur-winged Goose Osprey Steller's Jay Painted Bunting Streaked Saltator Palm Warbler Sulphur-crested Cockatoo Pelagic Cormorant Swainson's Francolin Pied Butcherbird Tawny Owl Pileated Woodpecker Thick-billed Euphonia Pine Grosbeak Three-banded Plover Pine Siskin Tricolored heron Pine Warbler Tufted Titmouse Purple Finch Varied Tit Pygmy Woodpecker Western Meadowlark Rainbow Lorikeet White-breasted Nuthatch Reddish Egret White-crowned Sparrow Red-bellied Woodpecker White-faced Whistling-Duck Red-breasted Nuthatch White-throated Sparrow Red-crowned Woodpecker White-tipped Dove Red-knobbed Coot White-winged Dove Red-legged Honeycreeper White Ibis Red-legged partridge Wild Turkey Red-tailed Hawk Willie-wagtail Red-winged Blackbird Willow Tit Red-winged Starling Woodhouse's Scrub Jay Ring-necked Dove Yellow-bellied Sapsucker Ring-necked Pheasant Yellow-crowned Euphonia Rock Pigeon Yellow-rumped Cacique Roseate Spoonbill Yellow-rumped Warbler Rosy-faced Lovebird Yellow-throated Warbler Royal Albatross Ruby-crowned Kinglet Ruddy Ground Dove Ruffed Grouse Rufous Hummingbird Rufous Motmot Rufous-tailed Hummingbird Saffron Finch .
Recommended publications
  • 345 Fieldfare Put Your Logo Here
    Javier Blasco-Zumeta & Gerd-Michael Heinze Sponsor is needed. Write your name here Put your logo here 345 Fieldfare Fieldfare. Adult. Male (09-I). Song Thrush FIELDFARE (Turdus pilaris ) IDENTIFICATION 25-26 cm. Grey head; red-brown back; grey rump and dark tail; pale underparts; pale flanks spotted black; white underwing coverts; yellow bill with ochre tip. Redwing Fieldfare. Pattern of head, underwing co- verts and flank. SIMILAR SPECIES Song Thrush has orange underwing coverts; Redwing has reddish underwing coverts; Mistle Thrush has white underwing coverts, but lacks pale supercilium and its rump isn’t grey. Mistle Thrush http://blascozumeta.com Write your website here Page 1 Javier Blasco-Zumeta & Gerd-Michael Heinze Sponsor is needed. Write your name here Put your logo here 345 Fieldfare SEXING Male with dark or black tail feathers; red- dish feathers on back with blackish center; most have a broad mark on crown feathers. Female with dark brown tail feathers but not black; dull reddish feathers on back with dark centre (but not blackish); most have a thin mark on crown feathers. CAUTION: some birds of both sexes have similar pattern on crown feathers. Fieldfare. Sexing. Pattern of tail: left male; right fe- male. Fieldfare. Sexing. Pat- AGEING tern of Since this species doesn’t breed in Aragon, only crown feat- 2 age groups can be recognized: hers: top 1st year autumn/2nd year spring with moult male; bot- limit within moulted chestnut inner greater co- tom female. verts and retained juvenile outer greater coverts, shorter and duller with traces of white tips; pointed tail feathers.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.4. Changes in the Bird Communities of Sierra Nevada Zamora ,R.1 and Barea-Azcón, J.M.2 1 Andalusian Institute for Earth System Research
    5.4. Changes in the bird communities of Sierra Nevada Zamora ,R.1 and Barea-Azcón, J.M.2 1 Andalusian Institute for Earth System Research. University of Granada 2 Environment and Water Agency of Andalusia Abstract The changes in the composition and abundance of passerine communities were studied along an elevational gradient, comparing the results found by censuses made in three different habitats (oak forest, high-mountain juniper scrublands, and high-mountain summits) at the beginning of the 1980s and at present. The results indicate that in the last 30 years, notable changes have taken place in the composition and, especially, in the abundance of the passerine communities. Significant declines in populations were appreciated in many of the species that were dominant in the 1980s, particularly in oak forests and in high-mountain juniper scrublands. The magnitude of the changes diminishes with elevation, and therefore the ecosystem that has changed the most was the oak woodland and those that changed the least were the ecosystems of the high-summits. The bird communities in Sierra Nevada showed a strong spatio-temporal dynamic that appears to be accentuated by global change. Aims and methodology The censuses of reproductive birds compiled censuses were made along linear transects with [13 - 17]. The current censuses were undertaken at the beginning of the 1980s and at present a fixed bandwidth of 50 m, 25 m on each side of within the framework of the Sierra Nevada (2008-2012) were compared. The sites studied the observer. The sampling effort was similar in Global Change Observatory from 2008 to 2012, were the same in both periods: an oak forest both periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Methods of the Song Thrush.-A Recent Review by Clark (Wilson Bull
    September 1976 . GENERAL NOTES 497 the weight loss is impressive, particularly since these caged birds had access to a super- abundant food supply. Ricklefs (1968) analyzed the relationship between maximum nestling weight and average adult weight for individual species. For this he constructed a ratio (R) of the asymptote from the growth curve to the average adult weight. Ratios greater than 1.10 were most common in aerial feeders, while ratios less than 0.90 were most common for ground feeders. Also, species with high R values tended to have long nestling periods. The ratio for Monk Parakeets was 1.28. This was somewhat higher than the intermediate levels that might be expected of an arboreal and ground feeder such as this species. However, the high R value of Monk Parakeets is in accord with what would be expected in species with similarly long nestling periods. Since the energy requirements for nestlings is the sum of maintenance energy and energy for growth, a low growth rate would tend to decrease the rate of energy demand for a nestling. If the number of surviving offspring is limited by the rate at which the parents can deliver energy to the young, then changes in the factors tending to lower the rate of energy demand of the nestlings could increase the number of potential offspring reared by the parents. One way to effect such a change is to lower the growth rate. However a low growth rate also increases the chances for predation and other nest losses by increasing the time in the nest.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Turdus Philomelos)
    The role of blunt egg pole characteristics for recognition of eggs in the song thrush (Turdus philomelos) Lenka Polacikovᡠ1,2,4), Bård G. Stokke3), Petr Procházka2), Marcel Honza2), Arne Moksnes3) & Eivin Røskaft3) (1 Department of Zoology, Palacký University, tr.ˇ Svobody, 26, CZ-771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic; 2 Institute of Vertebrate Biology, v. v. i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Kvetnᡠ8, CZ-603 65 Brno, Czech Republic; 3 Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway) (Accepted: 9 November 2009) Summary Colour and speckling of avian eggshells play important roles in egg recognition behaviour. However, only a few studies have paid attention to whether specific parts of eggs may be more important than others in rejection decisions by hosts. We hypothesised that the blunt pole in song thrush (Turdus philomelos) eggs possesses important cues for recognition of own eggs because this is the most visible part of the egg in the nest. We examined host response towards conspecific eggs painted blue either at the blunt or sharp poles, and used unpainted conspecific eggs as a control. We found, as predicted, that the experimental eggs painted blue at the blunt poles were rejected significantly more often than the experimental eggs unpainted at this pole. Rejection rates of experimental eggs were higher with increasing differences in number of spots between the two poles of own eggs. Our results confirmed that the essential cues used for egg discrimination in song thrushes are found at the blunt egg pole. Keywords: brood parasitism, egg discrimination, eggshell characteristics, recognition cues, rejection behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Methods for the Field Survey and Monitoring of Breeding Short-Eared Owls (Asio Flammeus) in the UK: Final Report from Pilot Fieldwork in 2006 and 2007
    BTO Research Report No. 496 Developing methods for the field survey and monitoring of breeding Short-eared owls (Asio flammeus) in the UK: Final report from pilot fieldwork in 2006 and 2007 A report to Scottish Natural Heritage Ref: 14652 Authors John Calladine, Graeme Garner and Chris Wernham February 2008 BTO Scotland School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA Registered Charity No. SC039193 ii CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................v LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................v LIST OF APPENDICES...........................................................................................................vi SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... viii CRYNODEB............................................................................................................................xii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS....................................................................................................xvi 1. BACKGROUND AND AIMS...........................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Rose-Breasted Cockatoo (Galah Cockatoo) Eolophus Roseicapilla
    Rose-breasted Cockatoo (Galah Cockatoo) Eolophus roseicapilla Class: Aves Order: Psittaciformes Family: Cacatuidae Characteristics: L. 35-38 cm; wt 300-435 gms. Females smaller. Gray back and flight feathers; pale pink crown; rose-red neck and underparts. Bone- colored beak; gray legs. Male: dark brown iris. Female: pink iris. Color of juveniles duller than adults. A highly intelligent, social and highly adaptable animal. Behavior: Bold and loud. Rely heavily on sense of sight. Highly social and long-lived. Bonded pairs have strong lifelong bonds with their partners. Preen facial feathers to show affection. Not highly territorial and often share roosting trees and food sources though minor squabbles frequently occur. Flocks congregate and forage on foot for food in open grassy areas. Communication consists of a high-pitched, splintered identifying call "chill chill; " harsher screeches when threatened, fighting or just having fun; and Range & Habitat: Mainland soft, muffled calls to initiate close contact. Australia and Tasmania in open habitats and urban areas such as Reproduction: Bonded pairs separate from flock and nest in tree cavities semi-desert, plains, open where a clutch of 2-5 white eggs is incubated 25 days by both parents. Fed with regurgitated food, chicks leave the nest about 49 days after hatching; woodland, farmlands and fields. reaching maturity in 4 years. Young have grayish plumage and a grey periophthalmic ring (naked area around their eyes) that fades as they approach maturity. Diet: Wild: grasses, herbs, seeds, nuts, berries, roots, green shoots, leaf buds, cereal crops, sunflower seeds; insects and larvae during breeding. Zoo: Cockatoo pellets, chopped fruit and vegetables, sunflower seeds (for training).
    [Show full text]
  • Best of the Baltic - Bird List - July 2019 Note: *Species Are Listed in Order of First Seeing Them ** H = Heard Only
    Best of the Baltic - Bird List - July 2019 Note: *Species are listed in order of first seeing them ** H = Heard Only July 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th 17th Mute Swan Cygnus olor X X X X X X X X Whopper Swan Cygnus cygnus X X X X Greylag Goose Anser anser X X X X X Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis X X X Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula X X X X Common Eider Somateria mollissima X X X X X X X X Common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula X X X X X X Red-breasted Merganser Mergus serrator X X X X X Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo X X X X X X X X X X Grey Heron Ardea cinerea X X X X X X X X X Western Marsh Harrier Circus aeruginosus X X X X White-tailed Eagle Haliaeetus albicilla X X X X Eurasian Coot Fulica atra X X X X X X X X Eurasian Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus X X X X X X X Black-headed Gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus X X X X X X X X X X X X European Herring Gull Larus argentatus X X X X X X X X X X X X Lesser Black-backed Gull Larus fuscus X X X X X X X X X X X X Great Black-backed Gull Larus marinus X X X X X X X X X X X X Common/Mew Gull Larus canus X X X X X X X X X X X X Common Tern Sterna hirundo X X X X X X X X X X X X Arctic Tern Sterna paradisaea X X X X X X X Feral Pigeon ( Rock) Columba livia X X X X X X X X X X X X Common Wood Pigeon Columba palumbus X X X X X X X X X X X Eurasian Collared Dove Streptopelia decaocto X X X Common Swift Apus apus X X X X X X X X X X X X Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica X X X X X X X X X X X Common House Martin Delichon urbicum X X X X X X X X White Wagtail Motacilla alba X X
    [Show full text]
  • Individual Repeatability, Species Differences, and The
    Supplementary Materials: Individual repeatability, species differences, and the influence of socio-ecological factors on neophobia in 10 corvid species SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS 2 Figure S1 . Latency to touch familiar food in each round, across all conditions and species. Round 3 differs from round 1 and 2, while round 1 and 2 do not differ from each other. Points represent individuals, lines represent median. SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS 3 Figure S2 . Site effect on latency to touch familiar food in azure-winged magpie, carrion crow and pinyon jay. SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS 4 Table S1 Pairwise comparisons of latency data between species Estimate Standard error z p-value Blue jay - Azure-winged magpie 0.491 0.209 2.351 0.019 Carrion crow - Azure-winged magpie -0.496 0.177 -2.811 0.005 Clark’s nutcracker - Azure-winged magpie 0.518 0.203 2.558 0.011 Common raven - Azure-winged magpie -0.437 0.183 -2.392 0.017 Eurasian jay - Azure-winged magpie 0.284 0.166 1.710 0.087 ’Alal¯a- Azure-winged magpie 0.416 0.144 2.891 0.004 Large-billed crow - Azure-winged magpie 0.668 0.189 3.540 0.000 New Caledonian crow - Azure-winged magpie -0.316 0.209 -1.513 0.130 Pinyon jay - Azure-winged magpie 0.118 0.170 0.693 0.488 Carrion crow - Blue jay -0.988 0.199 -4.959 0.000 Clark’s nutcracker - Blue jay 0.027 0.223 0.122 0.903 Common raven - Blue jay -0.929 0.205 -4.537 0.000 Eurasian jay - Blue jay -0.207 0.190 -1.091 0.275 ’Alal¯a- Blue jay -0.076 0.171 -0.443 0.658 Large-billed crow - Blue jay 0.177 0.210 0.843 0.399 New Caledonian crow - Blue jay -0.808 0.228 -3.536
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Reducing Cockatoo Damage(PDF, 973.6
    Guidelines for Reducing Cockatoo Damage Wildlife Management Methods Photo and Figure credits Cover photograph: Sulphur Crested Cockatoo – Nick Talbot Figure 1: Long-billed Corella – Drawing courtesy of Jess Davies Sulphur-crested Cockatoo and Galah – Drawings courtesy of Nic Day Figure 2: Kite to simulate bird of prey – Zoe Elliott Figure 3: Galah – Nick Talbot Figure 4: Long-billed Corella – Ian Temby Figure 5: Cockatoo damage to timber frames – Jim O’Brien Figure 6: Cockatoo damage to outdoor furniture – Ian Temby Figure 7: Cockatoo damage to sporting ground – Mark Breguet Figure 8: Corellas feeding on grain – Mark Breguet Figure 9: Cockatoo damage to crops – Ian Temby © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2018 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ISBN 978-1-76047-876-6 pdf/online Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Threatened Species: Carnaby's Black-Cockatoo
    AustralianAustralian ThreatenedThreatened SpeciesSpecies Carnaby’s Black-Cockatoo Calyptorhynchus latirostris Conservation Status Commonwealth: Endangered (Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999) WA: ‘Specially protected fauna’ (Western Australian Wildlife Conservation Act 1950) What do they look like? This large black cockatoo (also known as the Short-billed Black-Cockatoo) has white tail panels, white cheek patches and a short bill. It lives only in southwest Australia where large-scale clearing for farming has fragmented much of its habitat, particularly mature eucalypts such as salmon gum and wandoo that have suitable hollows for nesting. Where do they live? Carnaby’s Black-Cockatoo is endemic to southwest Western Australia, extending from the Murchison River to Esperance, and inland to Coroow, Kellerberrin and Lake Cronion. Most breeding occurs in areas with an average annual rainfall of 300-750mm, typically in the Wheatbelt and Great Southern regions. For nesting, Carnaby’s Black-Cockatoos require HowHow many areare there?there? eucalypt woodland, comprising principally of salmon gum or It is difficult to know how many Carnaby’s Black-Cockatoos wandoo. Their food is found in shrubland, or kwongan heath. are left, but it is known that their populations have declined by over 50% in the past 45 years, and that they no longer breed The cockatoos require a close association between breeding in up to a third of their former breeding sites in the Wheatbelt. and feeding sites during the breeding season. If these two very different habitats are not within a reasonable distance of each They are gregarious birds and live in pairs or small flocks during other, breeding attempts fail.
    [Show full text]
  • Living with Cockatoos: Problems and Solutions by Jenny Drummey
    Living with Cockatoos: Problems and Solutions by Jenny Drummey Cockatoos are their own worst enemy: The traits that draw us to them –beauty, intelligence, playfulness, and curiosity –bring a set of challenges that few families can meet long term. They’re beautiful, so we want to cuddle them. This can cause frustration and aggression in the bird. They learn quickly to forage, but that same skill can be used to open a cage door. I’ve shared my life with two cockatoos, so I am by no means an expert. But these two (Zeus, a male umbrella cockatoo, and Zoe, a female Moluccan) have taught me a lot. I’ve also learned about other types of cockatoos (goffins, bare-eyeds, Sulphur-crest- ed) while working with foster and adopting families as an adoption coordinator for Phoenix Landing. If you are thinking of bringing a cockatoo into your home, please consider the serious challenges. (Cockatiels, the smallest cockatoos, are much eas- ier to care for because of their size alone. Cockatiels make a great first bird, and Phoenix Landing has lots of tiels looking for homes too.) While every bird is unique, a few generalizations apply to cockatoos: All cockatoos will be loud at some point during the day, if even just at dawn and dusk, and so are not appropriate to keep in an apartment, townhouse, or house holds where quiet times are mandatory. Cockatoos shed a fine powder down that can irritate those with allergies or compromised breathing. Cockatoos require more than the average parrot to keep them busy, as they are highly intel- ligent and need activities to occupy them.
    [Show full text]