DOCSLIB.ORG

Financial Action Task Force Groupe D'action Financière

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Financial Action Task Force Groupe D'action Financière Financial Action Task Force Groupe d'action financière THIRD MUTUAL EVALUATION REPORT ON ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND COMBATING THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM PORTUGAL 13 OCTOBER 2006 © 2006- FATF/OECD All rights reserved. No reproduction or translation of this publication may be made without prior written permission. Applications for such permission should be made to: FATF Secretariat, 2 rue André-Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France Fax: +33 1 44 30 61 37 or [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Preface - information and methodology used for the evaluation ...............................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................................4 1 Background Information.........................................................................................................................................4 2 Legal System and Related Institutional Measures .................................................................................................5 3 Preventive Measures - Financial Institutions..........................................................................................................6 4 Preventive Measures – Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions ..................................................9 5 Legal Persons and Arrangements & Non-Profit Organisations ..............................................................................9 6 National and International Co-operation...............................................................................................................10 1 GENERAL .....................................................................................................................................................12 1.1 General information on Portugal.....................................................................................................................12 1.2 General Situation of ML and Financing of Terrorism......................................................................................13 1.3 Overview of the Financial Sector and DNFBP................................................................................................15 1.4 Overview of commercial laws and mechanisms governing legal persons and arrangements.......................22 1.5 Overview of strategy to prevent ML and TF....................................................................................................23 2. LEGAL SYSTEM AND RELATED INSTITUTIONAL MEASURES...............................................................33 2.1 Criminalisation of ML (R.1 and 2)...................................................................................................................33 2.2 Criminalisation of Terrorist Financing (SR.II)..................................................................................................39 2.3 Confiscation, freezing and seizing of proceeds of crime (R.3)........................................................................41 2.4 Freezing of funds used for TF (SR.III) ............................................................................................................44 2.5 The Financial Intelligence Unit and its functions (R.26, 30 and 32)................................................................49 2.6 Law enforcement, prosecution and other competent authorities – the framework for the investigation and prosecution of offences, and for confiscation and freezing (R.27, 28, 30 and 32)...................................................57 2.7 Cross Border Declaration or Disclosure (SR.IX and R.32).............................................................................61 3. PREVENTIVE MEASURES - FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ..........................................................................65 3.1 Risk of ML or TF.............................................................................................................................................65 3.2 Customer due diligence, including enhanced or reduced measures (R.5 to 8) ..............................................65 3.3 Third parties and introduced business (R.9)...................................................................................................79 3.4 Financial institution secrecy or confidentiality (R.4)........................................................................................80 3.5 Record keeping and wire transfer rules (R.10 & SR.VII) ................................................................................81 3.6 Monitoring of transactions and relationships (R.11 & 21)...............................................................................83 3.7 Suspicious transaction reports and other reporting (R.13-14, 19, 25 & SR.IV) ..............................................85 3.8 Internal controls, compliance, audit and foreign branches (R.15 & 22) ..........................................................89 3.9 Shell banks (R.18)..........................................................................................................................................93 3.10 The supervisory and oversight system - competent authorities and SROs ....................................................95 3.11 Money or value transfer services (SR.VI).....................................................................................................113 4. PREVENTIVE MEASURES – DESIGNATED NON-FINANCIAL BUSINESSES AND PROFESSIONS ...115 4.1 Customer due diligence and record-keeping (R.12).....................................................................................115 4.2 Suspicious transaction reporting (R.16)........................................................................................................120 4.3 Regulation, supervision and monitoring (R.24-25) .......................................................................................125 4.4 Other non-financial businesses and professions..........................................................................................128 5. LEGAL PERSONS AND ARRANGEMENTS & NON-PROFIT ORGANISATIONS....................................129 5.1 Legal Persons – Access to beneficial ownership and control information (R.33) .........................................129 5.2 Legal Arrangements – Access to beneficial ownership and control information (R.34)................................132 5.3 Non-profit organisations (SR.VIII)................................................................................................................133 FATF/ME(2006)7 6. NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL CO-OPERATION ..............................................................................136 6.1 National co-operation and coordination (R.31 & 32).....................................................................................136 6.2 The Conventions and UN Special Resolutions (R.35 & SR.I).......................................................................138 6.3 Mutual Legal Assistance (R.36-38, SR.V) ....................................................................................................140 6.4 Extradition (R.37, 39, SR.V) .........................................................................................................................144 6.5 Other Forms of International Co-operation (R.40 & SR.V) ...........................................................................147 7. OTHER ISSUES..........................................................................................................................................151 7.1 Resources and Statistics..........................................................................................................................151 7.1.1 Resources – Compliance with Recommendation 30....................................................................................151 7.1.2 Statistics (Summary of Recommendations and Comments) ........................................................................151 7.1.3 Compliance with Recommendation 32.........................................................................................................151 7.2 Other relevant AML/CFT measures or issues ..............................................................................................151 7.3 General framework for AML/CFT system (see also Section 1.1)..................................................................152 8. TABLES............................................................................................................................................................153 Table 1. Ratings of Compliance with FATF Recommendations..........................................................................153 Table 2: Recommended Action Plan to Improve the AML/CFT System...............................................................160 2 FATF/ME(2006)7 Preface - information and methodology used for the evaluation 1. The evaluation of the Anti-Money Laundering (AML)1 and combating the financing of terrorism (CFT) regime of Portugal was based on the Forty Recommendations 2003 and the Nine Special Recommendations on TF 2001 of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), and was prepared using the AML/CFT Methodology 2004. The evaluation was based on the laws, regulations and other materials supplied by Portugal, and information obtained by the evaluation team during its on-site visit to Portugal from 6 March to 17 March 2006, and subsequently. During the on-site
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Penal Code Chapter 32. Fraud
    PENAL CODE TITLE 7. OFFENSES AGAINST PROPERTY CHAPTER 32. FRAUD SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec.A32.01.AADEFINITIONS. In this chapter: (1)AA"Financial institution" means a bank, trust company, insurance company, credit union, building and loan association, savings and loan association, investment trust, investment company, or any other organization held out to the public as a place for deposit of funds or medium of savings or collective investment. (2)AA"Property" means: (A)AAreal property; (B)AAtangible or intangible personal property including anything severed from land; or (C)AAa document, including money, that represents or embodies anything of value. (3)AA"Service" includes: (A)AAlabor and professional service; (B)AAtelecommunication, public utility, and transportation service; (C)AAlodging, restaurant service, and entertainment; and (D)AAthe supply of a motor vehicle or other property for use. (4)AA"Steal" means to acquire property or service by theft. Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994. Sec.A32.02.AAVALUE. (a) Subject to the additional criteria of Subsections (b) and (c), value under this chapter is: (1)AAthe fair market value of the property or service at the time and place of the offense; or 1 (2)AAif the fair market value of the property cannot be ascertained, the cost of replacing the property within a reasonable time after the offense. (b)AAThe value of documents, other than those having a readily ascertainable market value, is: (1)AAthe amount due and collectible at maturity less any part that has been satisfied, if the document constitutes evidence of a debt; or (2)AAthe greatest amount of economic loss that the owner might reasonably suffer by virtue of loss of the document, if the document is other than evidence of a debt.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Court Ruling on Criminal Defamation
    THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA 5 CORAM: HON. JUSTICE A.E.N. MPAGI-BAHIGEINE, JA HON. JUSTICE S.G. ENGWAU, JA HON. JUSTICE C.K. BYAMUGISHA, JA HON. JUSTICE S.B.K. KAVUMA, JA 10 HON. JUSTICE A.S. NSHIMYE, JA CONSTITUTIONAL REFERENCE NO. 1/2008 (Arising out of Criminal Case No. 41 of 2008 in the Chief Magistrates Court at Nakawa) 15 1. JOACHIM BUWEMBO 2. BERNARD TABAIRE 3. EMMANUEL DAVIES GYEZAHO 4. MUKASA ROBERT ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: APPLICANTS VERSUS 20 ATTORNEY GENERAL ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: RESPONDENT (Statutory interpretation - Whether Section 179 of the Penal Code Act (Cap 120) is inconsistent with Article 29(1) (a) of the Constitution. - Whether or not Sections 179 of the Penal Code Act is a restriction permitted under Article 43 of the Constitution as being demonstrably justifiable in a free and democratic society.) 25 Ruling of the Court This Constitutional Reference arose out of Criminal Case No. 41 of 2008, instituted at Nakawa Magistrates Court, wherein the four applicants, namely Joachim Buwembo, Bernard Tabaire, 30 Emmanuel Davies Gyezaho and Mukasa Robert, were jointly charged with libel, contrary to sections 179 and 22 of the Penal Code Act. 1 The facts giving rise to this charge are that the said applicants who are journalists with the Monitor Newspaper, published articles in their Sunday issues of 19th and 26th August 2007 captioned “IGG IN SALARY SCANDAL” and “GOD’S WARRIOR FAITH MWONDHA 5 STUMBLES” respectively. Following a complaint to the police by the Hon. Lady Justice Faith Mwondha, the IGG, the applicants were investigated and later charged, at the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Nakawa, with the offence of unlawful publication of defamatory matter under sections 179 and 22 of the Penal Code Act (Cap 120).
    [Show full text]
  • Penal Code Offenses by Punishment Range Office of the Attorney General 2
    PENAL CODE BYOFFENSES PUNISHMENT RANGE Including Updates From the 85th Legislative Session REV 3/18 Table of Contents PUNISHMENT BY OFFENSE CLASSIFICATION ........................................................................... 2 PENALTIES FOR REPEAT AND HABITUAL OFFENDERS .......................................................... 4 EXCEPTIONAL SENTENCES ................................................................................................... 7 CLASSIFICATION OF TITLE 4 ................................................................................................. 8 INCHOATE OFFENSES ........................................................................................................... 8 CLASSIFICATION OF TITLE 5 ............................................................................................... 11 OFFENSES AGAINST THE PERSON ....................................................................................... 11 CLASSIFICATION OF TITLE 6 ............................................................................................... 18 OFFENSES AGAINST THE FAMILY ......................................................................................... 18 CLASSIFICATION OF TITLE 7 ............................................................................................... 20 OFFENSES AGAINST PROPERTY .......................................................................................... 20 CLASSIFICATION OF TITLE 8 ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Punishment
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY S~NATOR BILL LOCKYER, CHAIRMAN Special Hearing on THE PROCESS OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT MARCH 19, 1985 111137 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated l' in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily 1'1 represent the official position or pOlicies of the National !l1stitute of ........ Justice . ....... ...... ....... r p. 0:::«z -<C Z to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). ~~ Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ [J,J '--J.U sion of the copyright owner. 0:= oe= O~ ::J ::><C l­ -:>J: CI}:C « e= to -I zC: t:f) Cl)CrJ CO Ql (/) offi r: 0"1,........ ?Z ..... "'-I .... &) Q;:) lad .. C<Q 0 -c.9 UJr 0"1 'f:" fa Z ,........ ~ [J,J UJ~ C» U as r -I (---4U .., Q :: O;J :r: I""'l (3)""'" « (-0_ -I I'!~ IG U U >- ;:J -z -0"" ~~ 0:: < 2:-1 U ~ ~ 0 0:= <» « ::Ed ,..J ~ 0 o 00 e- ~ ~ 0 el) -I--- '-U~ « uO:=o U LLll­ :ct: (-<C ~~ ZllJ«Z W{/) ~ en U SPECIAL HEARING ON THE PROCESS OF CAPITAL PUNISFlMENl' CASES March 19, 1985 Senate Judiciary Committee Bill Lockyer, Chairman Ed Davis Nicholas C. Pettis Jolm Doolittle Robert Presley Barry Keene Art Torres Mil ton Marks Diane Watson Senate Judiciary Ccmnittee Tuesday, March 19, 1985 1 :30 p.m., Roan 4203 AGENDA: TI1E PROCESS OF A CAPITAL PUNISHMENT CASE 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • 1192.7. (C) As Used in This Section, "Serious Felony"
    Penal Code 1192.7 (c) 1192.7. (c) As used in this section, "serious felony" means any of the following: (1) Murder or voluntary manslaughter; (2) mayhem; (3) rape; (4) sodomy by force, violence, duress, menace, threat of great bodily injury, or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury on the victim or another person; (5) oral copulation by force, violence, duress, menace, threat of great bodily injury, or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury on the victim or another person; (6) lewd or lascivious act on a child under 14 years of age; (7) any felony punishable by death or imprisonment in the state prison for life; (8) any felony in which the defendant personally inflicts great bodily injury on any person, other than an accomplice, or any felony in which the defendant personally uses a firearm; (9) attempted murder; (10) assault with intent to commit rape or robbery; (11) assault with a deadly weapon or instrument on a peace officer; (12) assault by a life prisoner on a noninmate; (13) assault with a deadly weapon by an inmate; (14) arson; (15) exploding a destructive device or any explosive with intent to injure; (16) exploding a destructive device or any explosive causing bodily injury, great bodily injury, or mayhem; (17) exploding a destructive device or any explosive with intent to murder; (18) any burglary of the first degree; (19) robbery or bank robbery; (20) kidnapping; (21) holding of a hostage by a person confined in a state prison; (22) attempt to commit a felony punishable by death or imprisonment in the state prison
    [Show full text]
  • Crime and Criminal Justice
    Population and social conditions Statistics in focus 58/2010 Authors: Cynthia TAVARES, Geoffrey THOMAS Crime and Criminal Justice Recent work at European level to improve the In a few southern countries such as Portugal, comparability of the data makes it possible to Slovenia, Spain, Italy and Cyprus, crime rates have make some analysis of trends in crime and risen. There is also some indication among the criminal justice. Nordic Member States that, after a period of National sources of information about crime decreasing crime, the trend is now upwards. show considerable differences in approach and Underlying the total crime trends, there are coverage, which makes it necessary to exercise different tendencies for specific types of offence. caution in making direct comparisons between For the EU as a whole, police recorded instances of countries. domestic burglary and drug trafficking have Main findings remained virtually unchanged since 2005, while The total number of crimes recorded by the police violent crime (including robbery) and thefts of in the European Union is decreasing. Until 2002, motor vehicles have fallen. the trend was upwards. The countries where the The prison population rate (per head of population) decreases are most noticeable include the remains generally much higher in most countries in United Kingdom, the Netherlands and France. In the eastern part of the European Union than in the some of the new Member States, crime rates west, but it is gradually falling, while the prison peaked slightly later, but here also they are now populations have grown in some western Member falling. States such as Spain and the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • O Arqueólogo Português Série V
    © DISTRIBUIÇÃO GRATUITA. NÃO É PERMITIDA A COMERCIALIZAÇÃO. © DISTRIBUIÇÃO GRATUITA. NÃO É PERMITIDA A COMERCIALIZAÇÃO. revista_OAP_10.indd 1 31/03/2017 00:40 Revista fundada em 1895 por José Leite de Vasconcelos © DISTRIBUIÇÃO GRATUITA. NÃO É PERMITIDA A COMERCIALIZAÇÃO. revista_OAP_10.indd 2 31/03/2017 00:40 Revista fundada em 1895 por José Leite de Vasconcelos © DISTRIBUIÇÃO GRATUITA. NÃO É PERMITIDA A COMERCIALIZAÇÃO. revista_OAP_10.indd 3 31/03/2017 00:40 SÉRIE V . VOLUME 4/5 MUSEU NACIONAL DE ARQUEOLOGIA IMPRENSA NACIONAL LISBOA, 2014-2015 © DISTRIBUIÇÃO GRATUITA. NÃO É PERMITIDA A COMERCIALIZAÇÃO. revista_OAP_10.indd 4 31/03/2017 00:40 SÉRIE V . VOLUME 4/5 MUSEU NACIONAL DE ARQUEOLOGIA IMPRENSA NACIONAL LISBOA, 2014-2015 © DISTRIBUIÇÃO GRATUITA. NÃO É PERMITIDA A COMERCIALIZAÇÃO. revista_OAP_10.indd 5 31/03/2017 00:40 DIRETOR António Carvalho COORDENAÇÃO Ana Ávila de Melo Lívia Cristina Coito CONSELHO EDITORIAL Prof. Doutor Armando Coelho F. da Silva – Universidade do Porto Prof. Doutor João Luís Cardoso – Universidade Aberta Prof. Doutor José d’Encarnação – Universidade de Coimbra Dr. Luís Raposo – Museu Nacional de Arqueologia Prof. Doutor Nuno Bicho – Universidade do Algarve Prof.ª Doutora Rosa Varela Gomes – Universidade Nova de Lisboa Prof. Doutor Victor S. Gonçalves – Universidade de Lisboa DESIGN GRÁFICO Artlandia PAGINAÇÃO Undo PRÉ -IMPRESSÃO E IMPRESSÃO Imprensa Nacional -Casa da Moeda TIRAGEM 1000 exemplares Impresso em abril de 2017 Periodicidade anual ISSN 0870 -094X Depósito legal n.º 3161/83 Solicita-se permuta – On prie l’échange – Exchange wanted – Tauschverkehr erwunscht – Sollicitiamo scambio As opiniões expressas em texto e imagens são da exclusiva responsabilidade dos seus respetivos autores, salvo quando devidamente assinalado.
    [Show full text]
  • SM. Criminal Attempt., Model Penal Code § 5.01
    § SM. Criminal Attempt., Model Penal Code § 5.01 Uniform Laws Annotated Model Penal Code (Refs & Annos) Part I. General Provisions Article 5. Inchoate Crimes Model Penal Code § 5.01 § 5.01. Criminal Attempt. Currentness (1) Definition of Attempt. A person is guilty of an attempt to commit a crime if, acting with the kind of culpability otherwise required for commission of the crime, he: (a) purposely engages in conduct that would constitute the crime if the attendant circumstances were as he believes them to be; or (b) when causing a particular result is an element of the crime, does or omits to do anything with the purpose of causing or with the belief that it will cause such result without further conduct on his part; or (c) purposely does or omits to do anything that, under the circumstances as he believes them to be, is an act or omission constituting a substantial step in a course of conduct planned to culminate in his commission of the crime. (2) Conduct That May Be Held Substantial Step Under Subsection (1)(c). Conduct shall not be held to constitute a substantial step under Subsection (1)(c) of this Section unless it is strongly corroborative of the actor's criminal purpose. Without negativing the sufficiency of other conduct, the following, if strongly corroborative of the actor's criminal purpose, shall not be held insufficient as a matter of law: (a) lying in wait, searching for or 'following the contemplated victim of the crime; (b) enticing or seeking to entice the contemplated victim of the crime to go to the place contemplated for its commission; (c) reconnoitering the place contemplated for the commission of the crime; (d) unlawful entry of a structure, vehicle or enclosure in which it is contemplated that the crime will be committed; (e) possession of materials to be employed in the commission of the crime, that are specially designed for such unlawful use or that can serve no lawful purpose of the actor under the circumstances; WEST A.
    [Show full text]
  • CRIMINAL CODE (Wholly Amended As of Jan
    CRIMINAL CODE (Wholly amended as of Jan. 1, 1998) PART I GENERAL RULES CHAPTER I LIMIT OF APPLICABILITY OF CRIMINAL CODE Article 1 (Criminality and Punishability of Act) (1) The criminality and punishability of an act shall be determined by the law in effect at the time of the commission of that act. (2) When a law is changed after the commission of a crime, such act thereby no longer constitutes a crime under the new law, or the punishment therefore under the new law becomes less severe than under the previous law, the new law shall apply. (3) When a law is changed after the sentence for a crime committed under the previous law has become final and such act thereby no longer constitutes a crime, the execution of the punishment shall be remitted. Article 2 (Domestic Crimes) This Act shall apply to both Korean nationals and aliens who commit crimes in the territory of the Republic of Korea. Article 3 (Crimes by Koreans outside Korea) This Act shall apply to all Korean nationals who commit crimes outside the territory of the Republic of Korea. Article 4 (Crimes by Aliens on Board Korean Vessel, etc. outside Korea) This Act shall apply to aliens who commit crimes on board a Korean vessel or Korean aircraft outside the territory of the Republic of Korea. Article 5 (Crimes by Aliens outside Korea) This Act shall apply to aliens who commit any of the following crimes outside the territory of the Republic of Korea: Crimes concerning insurrection; Crimes concerning foreign aggression; Crimes concerning the national flag; Crimes concerning currency; Crimes concerning securities, postage and revenue stamps; Crimes specified in Articles 225 through 230 among crimes concerning documents; and Crimes specified in Article 238 among crimes concerning seals.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13, Crimes Against Property
    Chapter 13 CHAPTER 13: CRIMES AGAINST PROPERTY INTRODUCTION Crimes against property can take many forms and have many different names. Texas prefers “theft” over the older term ‘larceny,’ has a consolidate theft statute, and a whole chapter dealing with computer crimes. Like all states, Texas has statutes dealing with robbery and forgery. Theft, embezzlement, and related statutes are found in Texas Penal Code (TPC) ch. 31, “Theft:” http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/PE/content/word/pe.007.00.000031.00.doc The robbery statutes are found in TPC ch. 29: http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/PE/content/word/pe.007.00.000029.00.doc TPC ch. 32 “Fraud” contains forgery, credit card abuse and related statutes: http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/PE/content/word/pe.007.00.000032.00.doc “Computer Crimes” are found in ch. 33 of the TPC: http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/PE/content/word/pe.007.00.000033.00.doc THEFT Like many states, Texas has a consolidated theft statute: Sec. 31.02 provides: CONSOLIDATION OF THEFT OFFENSES. Theft as defined in Section 31.03 constitutes a single offense superseding the separate offenses previously known as theft, theft by false pretext, conversion by a bailee, theft from the person, shoplifting, acquisition of property by threat, swindling, swindling by worthless check, embezzlement, extortion, receiving or concealing embezzled property, and receiving or concealing stolen property. The consolidated theft statute (sec. 31.03) is a long, complex and difficult statute. There are three basic ways to commit theft: (b) (1), (2) and (3).
    [Show full text]
  • Portugal 7 October 2017
    THE COUNCIL OF EUROP E CONVENTION ON PREVEN TING AND COMBATING VIOLENCE A GAINST WOMEN AND DOMESTIC V IOLENCE NGO SHADOW REPORT TO GREVIO Portugal 7 October 2017 The Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence | NGO shadow report to GREVIO Portugal CONTENT Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 3 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 8 2. Purposes, definitions, equality and non-discrimination, general obligations (articles 1 to 6) .................................................................................................................................................................... 9 3. Integrated policies and data collection (articles 7 to 11) .................................................... 13 4. Prevention (articles 12 to 17) ......................................................................................................... 19 5. Protection and support (articles 18 to 28) ................................................................................ 24 6. Substantive law (article 29 to 48) and Investigation, prosecution, procedual law and protective measures (articles 49 to 58)....................................................................................... 30 7. Migration and asylum (articles 59 to 61) ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Standards for Capital Punishment in the Law of Criminal Homicide*
    A PUNISHMENT IN SEARCH OF A CRIME: STANDARDS FOR CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN THE LAW OF CRIMINAL HOMICIDE* FRANKLIN E. ZIMRING** GORDON HAWKINS*** The substantive criminal law is rarely discussed in debates about the wisdom and utility of the death penalty. But the criminal law of homicide, important in its own right, also provides insight into the problems of selection, moral coherence, and practical ad- ministration that bedevil attempts to harness the punishment of death for public purposes. If that task is to be performed, the sub- stantive criminal law must be the mechanism by which it is accom- plished. Yet, since mid-century, the attempt to fashion standards for capital sentencing has been a fight against historical forces stronger than the power of legal classification. The current juris- prudence of death thus demonstrates the futility of the exercise. In this essay, we discuss the development of standards for the death penalty in the Model Penal Code (the Code), analyze the influ- ence of the Code provisions on modem death penalty legislation in the states, and question whe.ther legal standards are closely linked to the propensity to condemn murders and conduct executions. We conclude that efforts to provide a legal rationale for executions oc- curred far too late in the progress toward abolition of capital pun- ishment in Western Society to have any hope of success. I. A PENAL PARADIGM The most ambitious attempt to define the principles of substan- tive criminal law, at least in this century, is the American Law Insti- tute's Model Penal Code. A product of reform efforts in the 1950s and 1960s, the Code addressed the issue of standards for capital punish- * A version of this essay was delivered by Frank Zimring as the Simon E.
    [Show full text]