Statement and Return Report for Certification General Election 2018
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
November 2020 Election Results (Results As of November 30, 2020) U.S
New York State Congressional Delegation November 2020 Election Results (Results as of November 30, 2020) U.S. Senate 116th Congress (Jan. 2019 - Jan. 2021) 117th Congress (Jan. 2021 - Jan. 2023) Senator Charles Schumer (D) Senator Charles Schumer (D) (Up for re-election in 2022) Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D) Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D) (Up for re-election in Jan 2024) U.S. House of Representatives 116th Congress (Jan. 2019 - Jan. 2021) 117th Congress (Jan. 2021 - Jan. 2023) NY – 1 Lee Zeldin (R-Shirley) Lee Zeldin (R-Shirley) NY – 2 Peter King (R-Seaford) (Ret.) Andrew Garbarino (R-Sayville) NY – 3 Thomas Suozzi (D-Glen Cove) Thomas Suozzi (D-Glen Cove) NY – 4 Kathleen Rice (D-Mineola) Kathleen Rice (D-Mineola) NY – 5 Gregory Meeks (D-Far Rockaway) Gregory Meeks (D-Far Rockaway) NY – 6 Grace Meng (D-Queens) Grace Meng (D-Queens) NY – 7 Nydia Velazquez (D-Brooklyn) Nydia Velazquez (D-Brooklyn) NY – 8 Hakeem Jeffries (D-Brooklyn) Hakeem Jeffries (D-Brooklyn) NY – 9 Yvette Clarke (D-Brooklyn) Yvette Clarke (D-Brooklyn) NY – 10 Jerrold Nadler (D-Manhattan) Jerrold Nadler (D-Manhattan) NY – 11 Max Rose (D-Staten Island) Nicole Malliotakis (R-Staten Island) NY – 12 Carolyn Maloney (D-Manhattan) Carolyn Maloney (D-Manhattan) NY – 13 Adriano Espaillat (D-Manhattan) Adriano Espaillat (D-Manhattan) NY – 14 Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-Queens) Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-Queens) NY – 15 Jose Serrano (D-Bronx) (Ret.) Ritchie Torres (D-Bronx) NY – 16 Eliot Engel (D-Bronx) Jamaal Bowman (D-Yonkers) NY – 17 Nita Lowey (D-Harrison) (Ret.) Mondaire -
1605026 NY Spotlight Memo
! MEMORANDUM TO: Interested Parties FROM: Alixandria Lapp, Executive Director, House Majority PAC DATE: May 26, 2016 RE: Congressional Democrats Poised for Pick-Ups Across the Empire State With just over a month until New York’s June 28 congressional primaries, and just under six months from the November general election, Democrats are poised for significant pick-ups in congressional districts across the Empire State. This year Democrats are overwhelmingly on offense in New York – with at least six Republican held seats that could be flipped this November. Multiple Republican incumbents and challengers are finding their already-precarious political prospects diminishing even further as they struggle with a damaging party brand, a toxic presidential ticket-mate, and increasingly prove themselves out of touch with their own districts. Bottom line: With New York’s congressional Republicans increasingly vulnerable heading into the fall, Democrats are overwhelmingly on offense and well-positioned to win key districts across the state in 2016. New York Republicans Tied to Toxic Brand As in any presidential year, down-ballot races will be heavily shaped by the top of the ticket. For Republicans, particularly in New York, that’s bad news. Even before the GOP presidential race took shape, New York’s congressional Republicans faced significant structural political challenges. In six competitive Republican-held districts, President Obama either won or came within 1% of winning in 2008 and 2012. Now with Donald Trump as their presidential ticket-mate, down-ballot prospects for New York Republicans are far worse. Earlier this month, a poll by Morning Consult found that nearly half of all Americans would “be less likely to support candidates for public office if they say they back Donald Trump.” And despite Donald Trump’s big win in New York’s presidential primary, there’s no indication that it will translate to success in November. -
"Goodness Without Godness", with Professor Phil Zuckerman
THE SECULAR CIRCULAR Newsletter of the Humanist Society of Santa Barbara www.SBHumanists.org FEBRUARY 2011 February Program The First Amendment: a Public Discussion "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." The February meeting will be led by John Suarez, MD, retired Professor of Psychiatry. John is also a Trustee of Americans United for Separation of Church and State; Outreach Coordinator at the Center For Inquiry, Los Angeles; and a member of the Community Advisory Board at KCET-TV. When: Saturday, February 19, 2011 Where: The Patio Room at Vista del Monte, 3775 Modoc Road, Santa Barbara. Time: Doors open for socializing 2:30pm. Meeting starts at 3pm. Fee: Optional. $2 student, $5 general donations appreciated. Dinner Following: Dinner will be at Del Pueblo Mexican Restaurant, 5134 Hollister- in the Magnolia Shopping Center, at 5pm. Please e-mail [email protected] to reserve your seating. For more information: 805-689-2716 Website: http://www.SantaBarbaraHumanists.org Please park only in spaces behind the church marked "VDM" 2 The HSSB Secular Circular -- February 2011 Welcome New Members! that effect by April 30. Mary can be reached at 805- 967-3045, or mailto:[email protected]. Donald Archer, Santa Barbara Lloyd Simms, Lompoc Newsletter Delivery HSSB Book Club A large number of our members receive their by Marty Shapiro Secular Circular by email, our preferred method of distribution. -
Newly Elected Representatives in the 114Th Congress
Newly Elected Representatives in the 114th Congress Contents Representative Gary Palmer (Alabama-6) ....................................................................................................... 3 Representative Ruben Gallego (Arizona-7) ...................................................................................................... 4 Representative J. French Hill (Arkansas-2) ...................................................................................................... 5 Representative Bruce Westerman (Arkansas-4) .............................................................................................. 6 Representative Mark DeSaulnier (California-11) ............................................................................................. 7 Representative Steve Knight (California-25) .................................................................................................... 8 Representative Peter Aguilar (California-31) ................................................................................................... 9 Representative Ted Lieu (California-33) ........................................................................................................ 10 Representative Norma Torres (California-35) ................................................................................................ 11 Representative Mimi Walters (California-45) ................................................................................................ 12 Representative Ken Buck (Colorado-4) ......................................................................................................... -
2019 Political Disbursements Federal Candidates Disbursement Ratio
2019 Political Disbursements Federal Candidates Disbursement Ratio Name Amount Democrat Alabama Sen. Doug Jones (D) $2,500 41% California Rep. Amerish Bera (D) $2,000 59% Rep. Devin Nunes (R) $2,000 Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D) $1,000 Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R) $5,000 Republican Rep. Linda Sanchez (D) $2,000 Rep. Mark Takano (D) $1,000 Rep. Raul Ruiz (D) $2,500 Name Amount Rep. Scott Peters (D) $1,000 Sen. Joyce Krawsiec (R) $1,000 Rep. Ted Lieu (D) $500 Rep. Graig Meyer (D) $500 Delaware Sen. Jim Perry (D) $500 Sen. Christopher Coons (D) $1,000 Rep. Larry Potts (R) $500 Rep. Robert Reives (D) $500 Florida Sen. Gladys Robinson (D) $500 Rep. Greg Steube (R) $1,000 Rep. Wayne Sasser (R) $500 Rep. Stephanie Murphy (D) $2,000 Sen. Mike Woodard (D) $500 Georgia Rep. Mark Meadows (R) $1,000 Rep. Douglas Collins (R) $2,500 Rep. Richard Hudson (R) $5,000 Sen. Thom Tillis (R) $4,000 Hawaii Sen. Mazie Hirono (D) $500 North Dakota Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R) $500 Illinois Rep. Brad Schneider (D) $4,000 Nebraska Rep. Cheri Bustos (D) $2,500 Rep. Adrian Smith (R) $2,500 Rep. Darin LaHood (R) $2,500 Nevada Rep. Mike Bost (R) $2,000 Sen. Jacky Rosen (D) $1,000 Rep. Mike Quigley (D) $1,000 Rep. Robin Kelly (D) $1,000 New Hampshire Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R) $1,000 Rep. Ann McClane Kuster (D) $2,000 Rep. S. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D) $1,000 New York Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D) $1,000 Rep. Elise Stefanik (R) $2,000 Sen. -
Fee March Final.Qxd
VOLUME 62, NO 2 MARCH 2012 Features 6 How Government Distorts Labor Markets by Robert P.Murphy 10 The Politics of Health Care Rationing by Chidem Kurdas 16 Why the Titanic Is Sinking by James L. Payne 19 Never Mind the Gap by Max Borders 25 Of Constituents and Clans by Richard W.Fulmer 28 The Smoot-Hawley Tariff and the Great Depression by Thomas C. Rustici, Theodore Phalan, and Deema Yazigi 35 The Best Bet Is Freedom by Jason Riddle Page 10 37 The Volcker Rule by Warren C. Gibson Columns 2 Perspective ~ Lawrence O’Donnell and Government Job-Creation by Sheldon Richman 4 The Buffett Rule Will Create Jobs? It Just Ain’t So! by Roy Cordato 14 Our Economic Past ~ Are We Looking at the Wrong Depression? by Stephen Davies 23 Peripatetics ~ Fearing Hayek by Sheldon Richman 33 The Therapeutic State ~ Who Killed Michael Jackson? by Thomas Szasz 41 Give Me a Break! ~ Obamacare Abominations by John Stossel Page 23 47 The Pursuit of Happiness ~ The Case Against Sanctions on Iran by David R. Henderson Book Reviews 42 Adam Smith: An Enlightened Life by Nicholas Phillipson Reviewed by Martin Morse Wooster 43 Homeschooling: A Hope for America edited by Carl Watner Reviewed by Karen Y.Palasek 44 The Cultural and Political Economy of Recovery: Social Learning in a Post-Disaster Environment by Emily Chamlee-Wright Reviewed by Daniel J. D’Amico 45 Handbook on Contemporary Austrian Economics edited by Peter J. Boettke Reviewed by George Leef Page 42 Perspective Lawrence O’Donnell Published by and Government The Foundation for Economic Education Irvington-on-Hudson, NY 10533 Phone: (914) 591-7230; E-mail: [email protected] Job-Creation www.fee.org he commercial seems like a parody,but that sure President Lawrence W.Reed looks like Lawrence O’Donnell of MSNBC’s Editor Sheldon Richman “Last Word.” In the spot O’Donnell mocks Managing Editor Michael Nolan T Book Review Editor George C. -
Nos. 20-3434, 20-3492 in the UNITED STATES COURT OF
Case: 20-3434 Document: 26 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/29/2021 Nos. 20-3434, 20-3492 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________________________________________________________ FDRLST MEDIA, LLC, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. _____________________________________________________________ BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE THE CATO INSTITUTE, REASON FOUNDATION, INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION, DKT LIBERTY PROJECT, NADINE STROSSEN, P.J. O’ROURKE, CLAY CALVERT, ROBERT CORN-REVERE, MICHAEL JAMES BARTON, AND PENN & TELLER IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER/CROSS-RESPONDENT _____________________________________________________________ On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board _____________________________________________________________ Ilya Shapiro Counsel of Record Trevor Burrus Thomas A. Berry CATO INSTITUTE 1000 Mass. Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20001 (202) 842-0200 [email protected] Case: 20-3434 Document: 26 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/29/2021 RULE 26.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to FRAP 26.1(b) and 28(a)(1) and Third Circuit LAR 26.1, corporate amici curiae Cato Institute, Reason Foundation, Individual Rights Foundation, and DKT Liberty Project state that none of them have publicly traded parent companies, subsidiaries, or affiliates, and that they do not issue shares to the public. Dated: March 29, 2021 /s/ Ilya Shapiro Ilya Shapiro i Case: 20-3434 Document: 26 Page: 3 Date Filed: 03/29/2021 TABLE OF -
The Use of Style in the Arguments of Penn Jillette
SINCERELY, PENN: THE USE OF STYLE IN THE ARGUMENTS OF PENN JILLETTE Miles Cochran B.A., California State University, Sacramento, 2006 THESIS Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in COMMUNICATION STUDIES at CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, SACRAMENTO SPRING 2010 © 2010 Miles Cochran ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii SINCERELY, PENN: THE USE OF STYLE IN THE ARGUMENTS OF PENN JILLETTE A Thesis by Miles Cochran Approved by: ____________________________, Committee Chair Mark A.E. Williams ____________________________, Second Reader Barbara O’Connor ____________________________, Third Reader Elaine Gale ____________________________ Date iii Student: Miles Cochran I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this thesis is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the thesis. Approved by: ____________________________, Department Chair _______________ Nicholas F. Burnett Date Department of Communication Studies iv Abstract of SINCERELY, PENN: THE USE OF STYLE IN THE ARGUMENTS OF PENN JILLETTE by Miles Cochran This thesis rhetorically analyzes two artifacts from Penn Jillette on the topic of atheism using the methodology laid out in On Types of Style by Hermogenes. By examining two artifacts from the same general timeframe, by the same author on the same subject this thesis highlights the differences in style in order to draw conclusions about how the variations offered by a single author provide insight into the rhetor’s purpose. All of these conclusions help describe how style is used in argumentation to emphasize and even create arguments. Secondarily this thesis suggests that the Hermogenic method could be used more broadly in the discipline to offer a broad based unifying methodology for further examinations of style in rhetoric and argumentation. -
Liberalismen Er Skeptisk Miniessay PKK 2 AP
Munich Personal RePEc Archive Liberty - between reason and skepticism Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter University of Copenhagen December 2012 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/43542/ MPRA Paper No. 43542, posted 04 Jan 2013 11:28 UTC Kritik, nr. 206 (December 2012) Frihed mellem fornuft og skepsis Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard “Min vinkel på liberalismen er kort og godt, at jeg ikke ved, hvad der er bedst for andre mennesker.” Penn Jillette, tryllekunstner, 2011 Man siger, at ”kært barn har mange navne”, men nok så rigtigt er det måske, at mange børn har ét kært navn. Det gælder i hvert fald ”liberalismen” som politisk ideologi, der over de seneste to århundreder er blevet eksproprieret som betegnelse af snart sagt enhver del af det politiske spektrum, uanset hvor indbyrdes forskellige og modstridende, disse ellers måtte være. Man behøver kun at betragte de ganske forskellige meninger afhængigt af, om der er tale om anglo-amerikansk eller europæisk sprogbrug, hvor ”liberal” kan betyde alt fra en tilhænger af en minimalstat til en fortaler for en maksimalstat.1 Andre gange skelnes der indenfor den akademiske verden under tiden mellem ”politisk liberalisme” og ”økonomisk liberalisme”, ligesom der på dansk ofte foretages en kunstig og generelt ukendt distinktion mellem ”liberal” og ”liberalistisk”. I sagens natur er den store uenighed om betydningen af ”liberalisme” ikke mindre, når det gælder, en sådans normative fundament. Er den primært en økonomisk og nytte-fokuseret 1 Om forvandlingen af liberalisme fra at være synonymt med en lille og begrænset statsmagt, der primært skal sikre personlig frihed og fri markedsøkonomi, til ofte at betyde det stik modsatte, se f.eks. -
GUIDE to the 117Th CONGRESS
GUIDE TO THE 117th CONGRESS Table of Contents Health Professionals Serving in the 117th Congress ................................................................ 2 Congressional Schedule ......................................................................................................... 3 Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 2021 Federal Holidays ............................................. 4 Senate Balance of Power ....................................................................................................... 5 Senate Leadership ................................................................................................................. 6 Senate Committee Leadership ............................................................................................... 7 Senate Health-Related Committee Rosters ............................................................................. 8 House Balance of Power ...................................................................................................... 11 House Committee Leadership .............................................................................................. 12 House Leadership ................................................................................................................ 13 House Health-Related Committee Rosters ............................................................................ 14 Caucus Leadership and Membership .................................................................................... 18 New Members of the 117th -
The Economist/Yougov Poll May 8 - 11, 2021 - 1500 U.S
The Economist/YouGov Poll May 8 - 11, 2021 - 1500 U.S. Adult Citizens List of Tables 1. Direction of Country............................................................................. 2 2. State of the Economy............................................................................ 4 3. Direction of News Stories about the Economy............................................................... 6 4. National Unemployment Problem...................................................................... 8 5. Local Unemployment Problem ....................................................................... 10 6. Best Economic Indicator .......................................................................... 12 7. Current Unemployment Rate........................................................................ 14 8. Knowledge of Direction of Previous Months Unemployment Rate .................................................... 17 9. Good Job Indicator ............................................................................. 19 10. Unemployment Statistics ......................................................................... 21 11. Economist Predictions........................................................................... 23 12. Improving Economy............................................................................ 25 13. Presidential Credit............................................................................. 27 14A. Favorability of Financial Decision-Makers — Janet Yellen ...................................................... -
1 July 6, 2021 the Honorable Rosa Delauro Chairwoman
July 6, 2021 The Honorable Rosa DeLauro The Honorable Kay Granger Chairwoman, Appropriations Committee and Ranking Member, Appropriations Committee Subcommittee on Labor-HHS-Education and U.S. House of Representatives Related Agencies Washington, DC 20515 U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 The Honorable Tom Cole Ranking Member, Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor-HHS-Education and Related Agencies U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Dear Chairwoman DeLauro and Ranking Members Granger and Cole: On behalf of our two organizations, the national network of local senior nutrition programs we represent and the millions of older adults they serve, we thank you for your longstanding leadership and support for the Older Americans Act (OAA) Title III-C Nutrition Program. We are sincerely grateful to the Committee for its work to provide much-needed federal funding to our network through annual appropriations and in the critical emergency COVID-19 relief legislation enacted over the last sixteen months. It has undoubtedly enabled senior nutrition providers to respond quickly to wholesale changes in their operations while still ensuring that the basic human needs of nutritious food and human connection were met for millions of older adults. To continue this vital support and sustain home-delivered and congregate nutrition services that effectively reduce hunger, improve health and well-being, and enable independence, we urge that a minimum of $1,903,506,000 for the OAA Nutrition Program be included in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies (Labor-HHS-Ed) Appropriations bill. This request is also backed by a bipartisan letter led by Representatives Suzanne Bonamici, Theodore E.