Draft Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Chelmsford in Essex
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Draft recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Chelmsford in Essex May 2000 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND The Local Government Commission for England is an independent body set up by Parliament. Our task is to review and make recommendations to the Government on whether there should be changes to local authorities’ electoral arrangements. Members of the Commission are: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Professor Michael Clarke CBE (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Kru Desai Pamela Gordon Robin Gray Robert Hughes CBE Barbara Stephens (Chief Executive) We are statutorily required to review periodically the electoral arrangements – such as the number of councillors representing electors in each area and the number and boundaries of wards and electoral divisions – of every principal local authority in England. In broad terms our objective is to ensure that the number of electors represented by each councillor in an area is as nearly as possible the same, taking into account local circumstances. We can recommend changes to ward boundaries, and the number of councillors and ward names. We can also make recommendations for change to the electoral arrangements of parish and town councils in the borough. © Crown Copyright 2000 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. ii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page SUMMARY v 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 5 3 REPRESENTATIONS RECEIVED 9 4 ANALYSIS AND DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 11 5 NEXT STEPS 25 APPENDICES A Chelmsford Borough Council’s Proposed Electoral Arrangements 27 B The Statutory Provisions 29 A large map illustrating the existing and proposed ward boundaries for Chelmsford town and the parishes of Great Baddow and Springfield is inserted inside the back cover of the report. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND iii iv LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND SUMMARY The Commission began a review of the electoral arrangements for Chelmsford on 30 November 1999. • This report summarises the representations we received during the first stage of the review, and makes draft recommendations for change. We found that the existing electoral arrangements provide unequal representation of electors in Chelmsford: • in six of the 27 wards the number of electors represented by each councillor varies by more than 10 per cent from the average for the borough, and one ward varies by more than 20 per cent from the average; • by 2004 this unequal representation is not expected to improve, with the number of electors per councillor forecast to vary by more than 10 per cent from the average in eight wards and by more than 20 per cent in one ward. Our main draft recommendations for future electoral arrangements (Figures 1 and 2 and paragraphs 76–77) are that: • Chelmsford Borough Council should have 57 councillors, one more than at present; • there should be 24 wards, instead of 27 as at present; • the boundaries of 19 of the existing wards should be modified, resulting in a net reduction of three, and eight wards should retain their existing boundaries; • elections should continue to take place every four years. These draft recommendations seek to ensure that the number of electors represented by each district councillor is as nearly as possible the same, having regard to local circumstances. • In only one of the proposed 24 wards would the number of electors per councillor vary by more than 10 per cent from the borough average. • This improved level of electoral equality is expected to improve further, with the number of electors per councillor in all wards expected to vary by no more than 10 per cent from the average for the borough in 2004. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND v Recommendations are also made for changes to parish and town council electoral arrangements which provide for: • revised warding arrangements and the redistribution of councillors for the parishes of Great Baddow and Springfield; • an increase in the number of councillors serving South Hanningfield Parish Council and a reduction in the number of councillors serving South Woodham Ferrers Town Council. This report sets out our draft recommendations on which comments are invited. • We will consult on our draft recommendations for eight weeks from 16 May 2000. Because we take this consultation very seriously, we may move away from our draft recommendations in the light of Stage Three responses. It is therefore important that all interested parties let us have their views and evidence, whether or not they agree with our draft recommendations. • After considering local views, we will decide whether to modify our draft recommendations and then make our final recommendations to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions. • It will then be for the Secretary of State to accept, modify or reject our final recommendations. He will also determine when any changes come into effect. You should express your views by writing directly to the Commission at the address below by 10 July 2000: Review Manager Chelmsford Review Local Government Commission for England Dolphyn Court 10/11 Great Turnstile London WC1V 7JU Fax: 020 7404 6142 E-mail: [email protected] vi LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Figure 1: The Commission’s Draft Recommendations: Summary Ward name Number of Constituent areas Map councillors reference 1 Bicknacre & East & 2 East & West Hanningfield ward; Woodham Ferrers Map 2 West Hanningfield & Bicknacre ward 2 Boreham & The 2 Boreham ward; Great & Little Leighs & Little Map 2 Leighs Waltham ward (part – Great Leighs parish) 3 Broomfield & The 3 Broomfield, Pleshey & Great Waltham ward (part Map 2 Walthams – the parishes of Broomfield and Great Waltham); Great & Little Leighs & Little Waltham ward (part – Little Waltham parish) 4 Chelmer Village & 3 Springfield North ward (part – part of Springfield Map 2 and Beaulieu Park North parish ward of Springfield parish); Large map Springfield South ward 5 Chelmsford Rural 1 Chignall, Good Easter, Mashbury, Highwood & Map 2 West Roxwell ward; Broomfield, Pleshey & Great Waltham ward (part – Pleshey parish) 6 Galleywood 2 Unchanged Map 2 7 Goat Hall 2 Goat Hall ward; Waterhouse Farm ward (part) Large map 8 Great Baddow East 3 Baddow Road & Great Baddow Village ward; Map 2 and Rothmans ward (part – part of Rothmans parish Large map ward of Great Baddow parish) 9 Great Baddow West 2 Rothmans ward (part – part of Rothmans parish Map 2 and ward of Great Baddow parish) Large map 10 Little Baddow, 3 Unchanged Map 2 Danbury & Sandon 11 Marconi 2 All Saints ward (part); Waterhouse Farm ward Large map (part) 12 Moulsham & 3 Cathedral ward (part); Old Moulsham ward Large map Central 13 Moulsham Lodge 2 Unchanged Large map 14 Patching Hall 3 All Saints ward (part); Patching Hall ward Large map 15 Rettendon & 2 Unchanged Map 2 Runwell 16 St Andrews 3 Unchanged Large map 17 South Hanningfield, 2 Margaretting & Stock ward; South Hanningfield Map 2 Stock & ward Margaretting LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND vii Ward name Number of Constituent areas Map councillors reference 18 South Woodham – 3 Unchanged Map 2 Chetwood & Collingwood 19 South Woodham – 3 Unchanged Map 2 Elmwood & Woodville 20 Springfield North 3 Springfield North ward (part – part of Springfield Map 2 and North parish ward of Springfield parish) Large map 21 The Lawns 2 The Lawns ward (part) Large map 22 Trinity 2 Cathedral ward (part); The Lawns ward (part) Large map 23 Waterhouse Farm 2 Waterhouse Farm ward (part) Large map 24 Writtle 2 Unchanged Map 2 Notes: 1 Chelmsford town is the only unparished part of the borough and comprises nine wards. 2 Map 2 and the large map in the back of the report illustrate the proposed wards outlined above. viii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Figure 2: The Commission’s Draft Recommendations for Chelmsford Ward name Number Electorate Number Variance Electorate Number of Variance of (1999) of electors from (2004) electors from councillors per average per average councillor % councillor % 1 Bicknacre & East 2 4,188 2,094 -1 4,212 2,106 -5 & West Hanningfield 2 Boreham & The 2 3,994 1,997 -6 4,534 2,267 3 Leighs 3 Broomfield & The 3 5,945 1,982 -7 6,118 2,039 -8 Walthams 4 Chelmer Village & 3 5,398 1,799 -15 6,814 2,271 3 Beaulieu Park 5 Chelmsford Rural 1 2,155 2,155 1 2,162 2,162 -2 West 6 Galleywood 2 4,684 2,342 10 4,690 2,345 6 7 Goat Hall 2 4,526 2,263 7 4,642 2,321 5 8 Great Baddow East 3 6,295 2,098 -1 6,418 2,139 -3 9 Great Baddow 2 4,130 2,065 -3 4,175 2,088 -5 West 10 Little Baddow, 3 6,533 2,178 3 6,574 2,191 -1 Danbury & Sandon 11 Marconi 2 4,361 2,181 3 4,665 2,333 6 12 Moulsham & 3 6,662 2,221 5 6,729 2,243 2 Central 13 Moulsham Lodge 2 3,962 1,981 -7 4,294 2,147 -3 14 Patching Hall 3 6,677 2,226 5 6,992 2,331 6 15 Rettendon & 2 4,069 2,035 -4 4,470 2,235 1 Runwell 16 St Andrews 3 6,812 2,271 7 6,905 2,302 4 17 South 2 4,237 2,119 0 4,361 2,181 -1 Hanningfield, Stock & Margaretting 18 South Woodham – 3 6,214 2,071 -2 6,222 2,074 -6 Chetwood & Collingwood LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ix Ward name Number Electorate Number Variance Electorate Number of Variance of (1999) of electors from (2004) electors from councillors per average per average councillor % councillor % 19 South Woodham – 3 6,189 2,063 -3 6,213 2,071 -6 Elmwood & Woodville 20 Springfield North 3 6,728 2,243 6 6,734 2,245 2 21 The Lawns 2 4,360 2,180 3 4,422 2,211 0 22 Trinity 2 4,387 2,194 3 4,417 2,209 0 23 Waterhouse Farm 2 3,999 2,000 -6 4,494 2,247 2 24 Writtle 2 4,544 2,272 7 4,553 2,277 3 Totals 57 121,049 – – 125,810 – – Averages – – 2,124 – – 2,207 – Source: Electorate figures are based on Chelmsford Borough Council’s submission.