DOCSLIB.ORG

Classifications of Mental Disorders 17 Wikipedia Articles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Classifications of Mental Disorders 17 Wikipedia Articles Classifications of Mental Disorders 17 Wikipedia Articles PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 23:23:46 UTC Contents Articles List of diagnostic classification and rating scales used in psychiatry 1 Classification of mental disorders 4 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 15 American Psychiatric Association 26 DSM-5 30 DSM-5 codes 40 DSM-IV codes 50 International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 65 World Health Organization 72 List of ICD-9 codes 83 ICD-9-CM Volume 3 83 ICD-10 130 Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV 133 Research Domain Criteria 135 Global Assessment of Functioning 138 Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual 140 Chinese Classification of Mental Disorders 142 References Article Sources and Contributors 144 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 146 Article Licenses License 147 List of diagnostic classification and rating scales used in psychiatry 1 List of diagnostic classification and rating scales used in psychiatry The following diagnostic systems and rating scales are used in psychiatry and clinical psychology. Diagnostic Classification Diagnostic Criteria • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) • ICD-10 Chapter V: Mental and behavioural disorders • Chinese Classification of Mental Disorders • Feighner Criteria • Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC), a 1970s-era criteria that served as a basis for DSM-III • Research Domain Criteria (RDoC), a on-going framework being developed by the National Institute of Mental Health Interview instruments using the above criteria • Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) • Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (SADS) • Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (K-SADS) • Mini-international neuropsychiatric interview (MINI) • World Health Organisation Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) • Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) • Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS) Rating Scales ADHD For further information see ADHD • Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS v1.1) • Brown Attention-Deficit Disorder Scales[1] Autism Spectrum For further information see Autism Spectrum • Adult Asperger Assessment[2] • ASAS (Australian scale for Asperger's syndrome)[3] • Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) • Childhood Autism Spectrum Test (CAST)[4] • Q-CHAT (Quantitative CHecklist for Autism in Toddlers)[5] List of diagnostic classification and rating scales used in psychiatry 2 Anxiety For further information see Anxiety disorders • Beck Anxiety Inventory • Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) • Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale • Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) • Panic and Agoraphobia Scale (PAS) • Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) • PTSD Symptom Scale – Self-Report Version • Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) • Trauma Screening Questionnaire • Yale–Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) • Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale Dementia and Cognitive Impairment For more further information see Dementia • Abbreviated mental test score • Clinical Dementia Rating • General Practitioner Assessment Of Cognition • Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly • Mini-mental state examination Depression For further information see Rating scales for depression • Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) • Beck Hopelessness Scale • Centre for Epidemiological Studies - Depression Scale (CES-D) • Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) • Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) • Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale • Kutcher Adolescent Depression Scale (KADS) • Major Depression Inventory (MDI) • Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) • Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale List of diagnostic classification and rating scales used in psychiatry 3 Eating Disorders For further information see Eating disorders • Anorectic Behavior Observation Scale • Binge Eating Scale (BES) • Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26) • Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) Mania and Bipolar Disorder For more further information see Mania and Bipolar Disorder • Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale (ASRM) • Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Personality and Personality Disorders For more further information see Personality and Personality Disorder • Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (AGQ) • Hare Psychopathy Checklist • Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory • Narcissistic Personality Inventory Schizophrenia and Psychosis For further information see Schizophrenia, Psychosis • Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) • Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) • Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) • Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Other • Barnes Akathisia Scale • CAGE Questionnaire Global Scales • Clinical Global Impression • Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS) • Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) • Children's Global Assessment Scale List of diagnostic classification and rating scales used in psychiatry 4 References [1] https:/ / psychcorp. pearsonassessments. com/ HAIWEB/ Cultures/ en-us/ Productdetail. htm?Pid=015-8029-240 [2] http:/ / www. autismresearchcentre. com/ arc_tests [3] http:/ / www. aspennj. org/ pdf/ information/ articles/ australian-scale-for-asperger-syndrome. pdf [4] http:/ / www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/ pubmed/ 11918111 [5] http:/ / www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/ pubmed/ 18240013 Classification of mental disorders Psychology • Outline • History • Subfields Basic types • Abnormal • Biological • Cognitive • Comparative • Cultural • Differential • Developmental • Evolutionary • Experimental • Mathematical • Personality • Positive • Quantitative • Social Applied psychology • Applied behavior analysis • Clinical • Community • Consumer • Educational • Environmental • Forensic • Health • Industrial and organizational • Legal • Military • Occupational health • Political • Religion Classification of mental disorders 5 • School • Sport Lists • Disciplines • Organizations • Psychologists • Psychotherapies • Publications • Research methods • Theories • Timeline • Topics Psychology portal The classification of mental disorders, also known as psychiatric nosology or taxonomy, is a key aspect of psychiatry and other mental health professions and an important issue for people who may be diagnosed. There are currently two widely established systems for classifying mental disorders—Chapter V of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) produced by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) produced by the American Psychiatric Association (APA). Both list categories of disorders thought to be distinct types, and have deliberately converged their codes in recent revisions so that the manuals are often broadly comparable, although significant differences remain. Other classification schemes may be in use more locally, for example the Chinese Classification of Mental Disorders. Other manuals have some limited use by those of alternative theoretical persuasions, such as the Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual. The widely used DSM and ICD classifications employ operational definitions.[1] There is a significant scientific debate about the relative validity of a "categorical" versus a "dimensional" system of classification, as well as significant controversy about the role of science and values in classification schemes and the professional, legal and social uses to which they are put. Definitions In the scientific and academic literature on the definition or categorization of mental disorders, one extreme argues that it is entirely a matter of value judgements (including of what is normal) while another proposes that it is or could be entirely objective and scientific (including by reference to statistical norms);[2] other views argue that the concept refers to a "fuzzy prototype" that can never be precisely defined, or that the definition will always involve a mixture of scientific facts (e.g. that a natural or evolved function isn't working properly) and value judgements (e.g. that it is harmful or undesired).[3] Lay concepts of mental disorder vary considerably across different cultures and countries, and may refer to different sorts of individual and social problems.[] The WHO and national surveys report that there is no single consensus on the definition of mental disorder/illness, and that the phrasing used depends on the social, cultural, economic and legal context in different contexts and in different societies.[][4] The WHO reports that there is intense debate about which conditions should be included under the concept of mental disorder; a broad definition can cover mental illness, mental retardation, personality disorder and substance dependence, but inclusion varies by country and is reported to be a complex and debated issue.[] There may be a criterion that a condition should not be expected to occur as part of a person's usual culture or religion. However, despite the term "mental", there is not necessarily a clear distinction drawn between mental (dys)functioning and brain (dys)functioning, or indeed between the brain and the rest of the body.[5] Most international clinical documents avoid the term "mental illness", preferring the term "mental disorder".[] However, some use "mental illness" as the main overarching term to encompass mental disorders.[6] Some Classification
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hoe Moeilijk Is Het Om Te Stoppen Met Psychofarmaca? Afbouwen Als
    Psychofarmaca afbouwen de Harm Reduction methode Uitgegeven door Het Icarus Project en het Freedom Center Psychofarmaca afbouwen de Harm Reduction methode door Will Hall Uitgegeven door het Icarus Project en het Freedom Center Uitgeverij Tobi Vroegh The Icarus Project Freedom Center www.theicarusproject.net www.freedom-center.org [email protected] [email protected] Het Icarus project is een website, een netwerk van Het Freedom Center is een belangenorganisatie die lokale groepen en een mediaproject dat is opgezet door ondersteunt en actie voert in West-Massachusetts. mensen die last hebbben van de gekke gave die ook wel Het is een cliëntgestuurde organisatie van mensen met ‘psychische ziekte’ wordt genoemd. We bouwen aan een psychische problemen en/of ervaring met extreme nieuwe cultuur en taal die onze ervaringen met gekte bewustzijns toestanden. Het Freedom Center zet zich weerspiegelt in plaats van te proberen onze levens in een in voor holistische alternatieven, zorg met een ziel conventioneel kader te laten passen. en wil een eind maken aan gedwongen psychiatrische behandelingen. Tweede editie, juni 2012. Vertaling augustus 2015 Input en ideeën zijn welkom voor volgende edities van deze gids. Oorspronkelijke titel: TheHarm Reduction Guide to Coming Off Psychiatric Drugs Door Will Hall. Gepubliceerd door The Icarus Project and Freedom Center Met dank aan: Ben Abelow, George Badillo, John Banister, Amy Bookbinder, Dave Burns, Kent Bye, Mick Bysshe, Monica Cassani, Oryx Cohen, Colin, Mary Kate Connor, Laura Delano, Jacqui
    [Show full text]
  • Coming Off Psychiatric Drugs
    This guide brings together the best information we’ve discovered and lessons we’ve learned at The Icarus Project and Freedom Center. It is not intended to persuade anyone to stop taking psychiatric medications, but instead aims to educate people about their options if they decide to explore going off. In a culture polarized between the pro-medication propaganda of pharmaceutical companies on the one hand, and the anti-medication agenda of some activists on the other, we offer a harm reduction approach to help people make their own Harm Reduction Guide to decisions. We also present ideas and information for people who decide to stay on or reduce their medications. Coming Off Psychiatric Drugs Many people do fi nd psychiatric drugs helpful and choose to continue taking them: even with the risks, this may be a better option given someone’s situation and circumstances. At the same time, psychiatric drugs carry great dangers and can sometimes do terrible harm, even becoming bigger problems than the conditions Published by they were prescribed to treat. Too often, people who need help getting off The Icarus Project and Freedom Center psychiatric drugs are left without guidance, and medication decisions can feel like fi nding your way through a labyrinth. We need honest information that widens the discussion, and we hope this guide helps people trust themselves more and take better care of one another. www.theicarusproject.net www.freedom-center.org Second Edition, revised and expanded. ISBN 978-0-9800709-2-7 Health Professional Advisors, continued
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Dcounpsy Gordon.Pdf
    "At the time I didn’t know what was going on, so they diagnosed me with schizophrenia". The lived experience of being diagnosed with schizophrenia for people of Black African and/or Black Caribbean heritage: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Abigail Gordon A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of East London for the Professional Doctorate in Counselling Psychology University of East London September 2020 ! ! !!"#$%&$%'! ! "#$%&'()*+),)%-.!///////////////////////0! 1! 2)*1#3-1&%!//////////////////////////000! 11! "445)613-1&%.!/////////////////////////00! 111! 78&-)!95&,!:35-1#1:3%-!//////////////////////! 16! ()*+,-.+!///////////////////////////00! /! 01+,234.+521!/////////////////////////000! 6! ;).)35#<!-)5,1%&(&+=!//////////////////////00! >! 75+8,-+4,8!98:58;!//////////////////////000000! <! ?6)561)'!///////////////////////////0! @! A1-)53-85)!.)35#<!.-53-)+=!/////////////////////! @! 2)91%1-1&%!&9!:.=#<13-51#!*13+%&.1.!////////////////00000! @! B<)!#855)%-!#&%-)C-!&9!*13+%&.-1#!.=.-),.//////////////000! D! E&8%.)((1%+!:.=#<&(&+=!3%*!:.=#<13-51#!*13+%&.1.!///////////0! F! "*63%-3+).!3%*!*1.3*63%-3+).!&9!8.1%+!-<)!*13+%&.-1#!.=.-),!//////00! GH! 2)91%1-1&%!&9!.#<1I&:<5)%13!////////////////////0! GG! J-3-1.-1#3(!5).)35#<!&%!-<)!53-).!&9!.#<1I&:<5)%13!////////////! GK! B<)!41&L,)*1#3(!,&*)(!&9!,)%-3(!3%*!),&-1&%3(!*1.-5)..!////////00! GK! J#<1I&:<5)%13!/////////////////////////00! GM! N&%LO).-)5%!#8(-853(!)C:(3%3-1&%.!&9!:.=#<&.1.!////////////! G@! P.=#<13-51#!1,:)513(1.,!/////////////////////000!
    [Show full text]
  • SOWKPRP1.Pdf (307.2Ko)
    Running Head: MODELS OF PSYCHOSIS AND LIMITATIONS OF PSYCHIATRY 1 Models of Psychosis and the Limitations of Psychiatric Knowledge Practice-Based Research Paper Maya Ricker-Wilson Instructor: Amy Rossiter York University School of Social Work April 15, 2014 MODELS OF PSYCHOSIS AND LIMITATIONS OF PSYCHIATRY 2 Table of Contents Author Note……………………………………………………………………………………..3 Abstract…………………………………………………………………...……………………….4 Chapter One: Introduction……………………………………………………………………….. 5 Theoretical Framework…………………………………………………………………..11 Chapter Two: Research Design………………………………………………………………….13 Chapter Three: Literature Review and Analysis…………………………………………………15 Psychosis and Schizophrenia: Definitions……………………………………………….15 Psychiatric Explanations and Treatment…………………………………………………20 Alternative Theories and Evidence on Psychosis………………………………………..23 History and social control of madness…...………………………………………23 Evidence against psychiatric models…………………………………………….27 Existential and psychological themes of psychosis……………………………...33 Theories of “symptoms” of psychosis……………………………………….…..40 “Insight” as social control………………………………………………………..44 Voices of Consumers and Survivors……………………………………………………..45 Chapter Four: Discussion………………………………………………………………………...53 Relevance for Social Work in the Support of Individuals with Psychosis………………57 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….60 References………………………………………………………………………………………..62 MODELS OF PSYCHOSIS AND LIMITATIONS OF PSYCHIATRY 3 Author Note I would like to thank my parents, Carol Ricker-Wilson and John Wilson, my brother
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/Theme Health/HSQ31.Pdf
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Wachowska, Anna (2017). In the facets of powerlessness: agency as an essential aspect of the self. (Unpublished Doctoral thesis, City, University of London) This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/16924/ Link to published version: Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] In the Facets of Powerlessness: Agency as an Essential Aspect of the Self Anna Wachowska Portfolio for Professional Doctorate in Counselling Psychology (DPsych) City University London Department of Psychology February 2017 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... 7 City University Declaration ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]