2015 Nepal Earthquake Event Recap Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2015 Nepal Earthquake Event Recap Report Aon Benfield Analy tics | Impact Forecasting 2015 Nepal Earthquake Event Recap Report September 2015 Risk. Reinsurance. Human Resources. Aon Benfield Analy tics | Impact Forecasting Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 Seismological Recap 5 Human Casualty 9 Property Effects 10 Commercial Effects 13 Utility Effects 15 Infrastructure Effects 15 Impact Forecasting Reconnaissance 16 Impact Forecasting: Real-Time Response 26 Financial Losses 29 Appendix A 34 Appendix B 35 Appendix C 37 Contact Information 38 2015 Nepal Earthquake Event Recap Report 2 Aon Benfield Analy tics | Impact Forecasting Executive Summary A major magnitude-7.8 earthquake struck central Nepal on April 25, 2015, leaving catastrophic impacts across the country. It was the largest earthquake to strike Nepal in over 80 years. That tremor, plus subsequent aftershocks, left more than 9,100 people dead and nearly 25,000 others injured. Extensive damage was recorded throughout Nepal, particularly in the capital city of Kathmandu. The main jolt was later followed by a major magnitude-7.3 aftershock on May 12, 2015. Ground shaking from the first earthquake lasted for two minutes according to local reports and was felt as far away as New Delhi in India, Lahore in Pakistan, Lhasa in Tibet, and Dhaka in Bangladesh. Minimally 379 aftershocks rattled Nepal and the surrounding region with magnitudes 4.0 or greater in the months after the event, including five which registered above magnitude-6.0. Extensive catastrophic damage to property was reported throughout central Nepal, including in Kathmandu and throughout the Kathmandu Valley. Hundreds of thousands of buildings collapsed across many parts of Nepal as a result of the earthquakes, and the combined total of houses destroyed stood at 605,254. A further 288,255 were partially destroyed. Tens of thousands of other structures, including schools, health facilities and public government buildings, were also impacted. Additional damage to thousands of structures was reported in parts of India, Tibet, and Bangladesh. Several important historical buildings collapsed or sustained severe damage in Kathmandu and in the surrounding area including monuments that comprised the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization’s (UNESCO) cultural heritage site of the Kathmandu Valley. More than 30 monuments in the Kathmandu Valley collapsed, and an additional 120 incurred partial damage. Nationwide, more than 1,000 monasteries, temples, historic houses, and shrines were impacted. Nepal’s state utility provider, Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA) reported that 16 hydropower facilities – out of 23 that were operational – were significantly damaged (one of which was under construction at the time of the temblor). Collectively, the shutdowns resulted in a loss of 150 megawatts from Nepal’s power grid which represents approximately one-fifth of the country’s total power supply. The road and highway network across Nepal was heavily impacted, with more than 2,000 kilometers (1,242 miles) – or 13 percent of the network – damaged or destroyed. Worst affected were the districts of Sindhupalchowk, Dolakha, and Nuwakot. Impact Forecasting sent a team of seismological and engineering experts to survey the damage in Nepal. The main building typologies in Nepal are adobe structures, brick or stone masonry with mud mortar (BM/SM), brick or stone masonry with cement mortar (BC/SC), wooden structures (W), and reinforced concrete (RC) buildings. Impact Forecasting was able to determine how the differing building types and structures performed. This analysis was critical as we work to further improve the earthquake scenario model that we have developed for Nepal. The model is to be used as a tool for companies and clients to further analyze their earthquake hazard risks and exposures in the country. The overall economic cost of the Nepal earthquake(s) – including damage in Nepal, India, Tibet and Bangladesh – is estimated around USD8.0 billion. A World Bank assessment tentatively listed total economic damage solely in Nepal at USD5.1 billion and valued additional economic losses (including business interruption and specific sector losses) at nearly USD1.9 billion. This value is equivalent to more than one-third of Nepal’s entire Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Overall insured losses in Nepal, India, Tibet and Bangladesh were estimated around USD200 million. As of August 2015, the Nepal Insurance Board (IB) reported that 16,603 claims were filed to the 17 non-life insurance companies operating in the country with a total value of NPR18.43 billion (USD175 million). The agency expected total non-life claims to settle around NPR20 billion (USD190 million). 2015 Nepal Earthquake Event Recap Report 3 Aon Benfield Analy tics | Impact Forecasting Introduction A major magnitude-7.8 earthquake struck central Nepal on April 25, 2015, leaving catastrophic impacts across the country. It was the largest earthquake to strike Nepal in over 80 years. That tremor, plus subsequent aftershocks, left more than 9,100 people dead and nearly 25,000 others injured. Extensive damage was recorded throughout Nepal, particularly in the capital city of Kathmandu. The main jolt was later followed by a magnitude-7.3 aftershock on May 12, 2015. The combined death toll from both tremors stood at 8,891 and the number of injured was 22,302 in Nepal alone. A further 229 fatalities were registered in India, Epicenter of April 25, 2015 M7.8 event (Source: USGS) Bangladesh, China’s Tibet, and Mount Everest. The first earthquake struck at 11:56 AM local time (06:11 UTC) with an epicenter located 77 kilometers (48 miles) northwest of Kathmandu at a shallow depth of 15.0 kilometers (9.3 miles). The second earthquake struck at 12:50 PM local time (07:05 UTC) with a shallow epicenter located 18 kilometers (11 miles) southeast of Kodari, on the southwestern flanks of Mount Everest, also at a depth of 15.0 kilometers (9.3 miles). Ground shaking from the first earthquake lasted for two minutes according to local reports and was felt as far away as New Delhi in India, Lahore in Pakistan, Lhasa in Tibet, and Dhaka in Bangladesh. Minimally 379 aftershocks rattled Nepal and the surrounding region with magnitudes 4.0 or greater in the months after the event, including five which registered above magnitude-6.0. The European Space Agency’s satellite Sentinel-1A used imagery obtained before and after the earthquake to determine that the maximum land deformation occurred only 17 kilometers (11 miles) from Kathmandu which explained the catastrophic levels of damage experienced in that area. The earthquake’s slip – defined by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) as relative displacement of formerly adjacent points on opposite sides of a fault, measured on the fault surface – occurred over an area roughly 2,600 to 5,200 square kilometers (1,000 to 2,000 square miles) across a zone that included the cities of Kathmandu and Pokhara in one direction and nearly the entire Himalaya mountain width in the other. It is estimated that as much as 3.0 meters (10 feet) of northern India’s Bihar state slid beneath Nepal in a matter of seconds. Plot of M6.0+ earthquakes following main April 25 event in blue (Source: USGS) 2015 Nepal Earthquake Event Recap Report 4 Aon Benfield Analy tics | Impact Forecasting Seismological Recap The active collision of the Indian tectonic plate with its Eurasian counterpart is the driving force for tectonic activity in the Himalayan region. The subduction of the Indian plate beneath the Eurasian plate at a rate of 40-50 millimeters per year has produced an active fault system that extends from the Karakoram Ridge in the west to the Bengal Plain in the east. It comprises several major faults including the Himalayan Frontal Thrust (HFT), the Main Boundary Thrust (MBT), and the Main Central Thrust (MCT) (Figure 1). These active boundaries are located within Nepal and are the primary source of earthquakes in the country. Figure 1: Active faults in and around Nepal (Nakata and Kumahara 2002) Seismic Hazard The geographical location of Nepal naturally makes it one of the most seismically hazardous regions in the world. Nepal resides on the boundary of the Indian and Eurasian plates and numerous active faults have been identified in the Himalayan region. Several significant earthquakes (Mw > 7.5) have occurred in the past 500 years, including the Mw7.8 Kangara earthquake in 1905 and the Mw8.1 Nepal-Bihar earthquake in 1934 (Bilham and Ambraseys 2005). The complexity and uniqueness of the tectonic setting has attracted the attention of several researchers from across the globe. As a result, there is a wealth of knowledge available related to tectonic settings, seismic sources, and seismicity of the Himalayan region. However, the lack of observations of ground motion from earthquakes has been a major setback, especially for the quantification of seismic hazard. The global scientific community has yet to develop robust ground motion predictive models specific to this region. Despite that, hazard studies have progressed and Ram and Guoxin (2013) have developed a hazard map for Nepal for different return periods. Figure 2 shows peak ground acceleration (PGA) maps for 475 and 2,475 years return periods. The hazard maps show larger hazards in the far-western and eastern portions of Nepal, and lower hazards in southern Nepal. The estimated PGA values are in the range of 0.21-0.62 g, and 0.38-1.1 g for 475 and 2,475 years return periods respectively. 2015 Nepal Earthquake Event Recap Report 5 Aon Benfield Analy tics | Impact Forecasting 475 years return period hazard 2,475 years return period hazard Figure 2: Seismic hazard maps of Nepal showing the peak ground acceleration distribution at bedrock level (Ram and Guoxin 2013) 2015 Nepal Earthquake Sequence On April 25, 2015, a magnitude Mw 7.8 earthquake struck the Kathmandu region.
Recommended publications
  • Damage Mapping of April 2015 Nepal Earthquake Using Small
    J-Rapid Final Workshop 21 June, 2016, Kathmandu Inventory mapping of landslides induced by the Gorkha earthquake 2015 and a proposal for hazard mapping of future landslides for making a plan of better reconstruction "Impact on infrastructure by Gorkha earthquake 2015 induced landslides" Masahiro CHIGIRA Masahiro CHIGIRA Professor, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Professor, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University Kyoto University Vishnu DANGOL Vishnu DANGOL Professor, Department of Geology, Professor, Department of Geology, Tribhuvan University Tribhuvan University Objective 1. to make an inventory mapping on landslides, cracks, and landslide dams induced by the Nepal earthquake and to investigate their formative mechanisms 2. to detect displaced areas of slope surfaces, of which future susceptibility to landslides would be evaluated on the basis of geology, geomorphology, and groundwater conditions. 3. propose a methodology of hazard mapping for earthquake-induced landslides in Nepal. Members (Japan side) 1. Masahiro CHIGIRA (Kyoto Univ.) PI Applied Geology 2. Daisuke HIGAKI (Hirosaki Univ.) Landslide control 3. Hiroshi YAGI (Yamagata Univ.) Landslide susceptibility mapping 4. Akihiko WAKAI (Gunma Univ.) Geotechnical analysis of landslide 5. Hiroshi, P. SATO (Nihon Univ.) Remote sensing 6. Go, SATO (Teikyo Heisei Univ.) Geomorphology 7. Ching-Ying, TSOU (Hirosaki Univ.) GIS analysis 8. Akiyo YATAGAI (Res. Inst. Humanity and Nature) Meteorology Members (Nepali side) 1. Vishnu DANGOL (Tribhuvan Univ.) PI Applied Geology 2. Smajwal BAJRACHARYA (ICIMOD) Remote sensing 3. Shanmukhesh Chandra AMATYA (DWIDP) Hydrogeology 4. Tuk Lal ADHIKARI (ITECO-Nepal) Geotechnical Field survey • Trishuli River catchment from Trishuli to Syabrubesi (29 October to 1 November, 2015) • Sun Kosi and Bhote Kosi River catchments from Bansaghu to Kodari.
    [Show full text]
  • All Change at Rasuwa Garhi Sam Cowan [email protected]
    Himalaya, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies Volume 33 | Number 1 Article 14 Fall 2013 All Change at Rasuwa Garhi Sam Cowan [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/himalaya Recommended Citation Cowan, Sam (2013) "All Change at Rasuwa Garhi," Himalaya, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies: Vol. 33: No. 1, Article 14. Available at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/himalaya/vol33/iss1/14 This Research Report is brought to you for free and open access by the DigitalCommons@Macalester College at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Himalaya, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Research Report | All Change at Rasuwa Garhi Sam Cowan From time immemorial, pilgrims, traders, artisans, and Kyirong to aid the transshipment of goods and to carry religious teachers going to Lhasa from Kathmandu had to out major trading on their own account. Jest records that decide between two main routes. One roughly followed as late as 1959 there were forty five Newar households in the line of the present road to Kodari, crossed the border Kyirong and forty in Kuti (Jest 1993). where Friendship Bridge is built and followed a steep trail The two routes were used for the invasion of Tibet in 1788 to Kuti (Tib. Nyalam). Loads were carried by porters up to and 1791 by the forces of the recently formed Gorkha this point but pack animals were used for the rest of the state under the direction of Bahadur Shah, which led to journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal: Rural Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program
    Environmental Assessment Document Initial Environmental Examination Grant Number: 0093 NEP February 2010 Nepal: Rural Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program Sildhunga-Jethal-Tauthali-Tekanpur Road Subproject, Sindhupalchowk District Prepared by the Government of Nepal The Environmental Assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Government of Nepal Ministry of Local Development Department of Local Infrastructure Development and Agricultural Roads Rural Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program [ADBGrant 0093NEP] Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Report of Sildhunga-Jethal-Tauthali-Tekanpur Road Subproject, Sindhupalchowk District Submitted to: Ministry of Local Development Government of Nepal Proponent: Office of District Development Committee/ District Technical Office Chautara, Sindhupalchowk Prepared by: Frisa-Iteco Joint Venture (in association with SKAT) District Implementation Support Team (DIST) Chautara, Sindhupalchowk, Nepal Telephone No.: 011-620338 Fax No.: 011-620087 February, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations ………………………………………………………………………….....i Name and Address of Proponent………………………………………………..……...ii Executive Summary in Nepali………………………………………………………….iii Executive summary in English………………………………………………….…… viii Salient Features of the sub-Project………………………………………..………….xiii 1. Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………… 1 1.1. Background………………………………………………………………...........1
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Technology of Multi-Tiered Temples and Their Rehabilitation After 2015 April Earthquake in Bhaktapur
    Construction Technology of Multi-Tiered Temples and Their Rehabilitation after 2015 April Earthquake in Bhaktapur Rabina Shilpakar1, Prem Nath Maskey2, Pramila Silpakar3 Abstract Kathmandu Valley comprises of numerous tiered temples ranging from single-tiered to the multi-tiered. The 2015 Gorkha earthquake and the following aftershocks caused damages to many temples; the damages ranging from minor to few fully collapsed state. This paper focuses on Nepal’s tallest temple the Nyatapola, square-shaped in the plan and the Bhairavnath temple, rectangular-shape in the plan - representing the tiered temples with more than three tiers of the Kathmandu Valley. The paper investigates the employed indigenous construction technology, materials, structural and seismic performance of these temples. The paper also deliberates on the condition/ level of damage suffered by these temples during the 2015 earthquake; presents the existing condition and the ongoing reconstruction/ renovation works and interventions introduced following the recommendations of the structural, architectural and conservation experts. Keywords: Earthquake, technology, reconstruction, renovation Introduction Nepal is a culturally diversified and rich country in art and architecture. The Kathmandu Valley, in particular, has numerous temples of different styles/ types - shikhara, dome, and tiered temples. The tiered temples also vary from a single-tiered to five-tiered temples with its distinctive features. All the temples of the Kathmandu Valley constructed in the medieval period are based on the structural system of unreinforced brick masonry in mud mortar and wood. The tiered temples consist of various parts and elements performing the structural and decorative functions, and these elements are located at various strategic levels and places.
    [Show full text]
  • Kasthamandap
    asianart.com | articles Asianart.com offers pdf versions of some articles for the convenience of our visitors and readers. These files should be printed for personal use only. Note that when you view the pdf on your computer in Adobe reader, the links to main image pages will be active: if clicked, the linked page will open in your browser if you are online. This article can be viewed online at: http://asianart.com/articles/kasthamandap Kasthamandap: Microcosm of Kathmandu’s Living Culture and Storied History by Dipesh Risal September 03, 2015 (click on images to go to larger image and full captions) Kasthamandap is no more. It collapsed into a pile of rubble in the first of the earthquakes that rattled Nepal in April-May, 2015. Kasthamandap (literally Wooden Hall), originally a public rest-house (sattal), has also served many social and religious functions over its lifetime. It was easily the oldest standing building in all of Nepal, dating back to at least 1143 CE. Kasthamandap underwent numerous repairs, remodeling, and renovations over the centuries. However, the large platform with its surrounding quartet of tall, one-piece, “ship-mast” pillars and carved capitals – collectively making up its defining core – most likely date from the original foundation. Kasthamandap is also the largest structure ever built in the traditional triple-tiered roof style. In Nepal, its grand interior space was never surpassed until the eighteenth century. Further, it alone preserves the original configuration and may have established some sort of prototype for a suite of sattals built during the fourteenth through sixteenth centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Human Rights Year Book 2021 (ENGLISH EDITION) (This Report Covers the Period - January to December 2020)
    Nepal Human Rights Year Book 2021 (ENGLISH EDITION) (This Report Covers the Period - January to December 2020) Editor-In-Chief Shree Ram Bajagain Editor Aarya Adhikari Editorial Team Govinda Prasad Tripathee Ramesh Prasad Timalsina Data Analyst Anuj KC Cover/Graphic Designer Gita Mali For Human Rights and Social Justice Informal Sector Service Centre (INSEC) Nagarjun Municipality-10, Syuchatar, Kathmandu POBox : 2726, Kathmandu, Nepal Tel: +977-1-5218770 Fax:+977-1-5218251 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.insec.org.np; www.inseconline.org All materials published in this book may be used with due acknowledgement. First Edition 1000 Copies February 19, 2021 © Informal Sector Service Centre (INSEC) ISBN: 978-9937-9239-5-8 Printed at Dream Graphic Press Kathmandu Contents Acknowledgement Acronyms and Abbreviations Foreword CHAPTERS Chapter 1 Situation of Human Rights in 2020: Overall Assessment Accountability Towards Commitment 1 Review of the Social and Political Issues Raised in the Last 29 Years of Nepal Human Rights Year Book 25 Chapter 2 State and Human Rights Chapter 2.1 Judiciary 37 Chapter 2.2 Executive 47 Chapter 2.3 Legislature 57 Chapter 3 Study Report 3.1 Status of Implementation of the Labor Act at Tea Gardens of Province 1 69 3.2 Witchcraft, an Evil Practice: Continuation of Violence against Women 73 3.3 Natural Disasters in Sindhupalchok and Their Effects on Economic and Social Rights 78 3.4 Problems and Challenges of Sugarcane Farmers 82 3.5 Child Marriage and Violations of Child Rights in Karnali Province 88 36 Socio-economic
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Kodari Scheme of Rikaze-Kathmandu Railway
    2017 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Environment Protection (ICSEEP 2017) ISBN: 978-1-60595-464-6 Study on Kodari Scheme of Rikaze-Kathmandu Railway Location Yaoping ZHANG1,a 1Institute of Vacuum Tube Transport, Xijing University, Xi’an 710123, China a [email protected] Keywords: Rikaze, Kathmandu, Railway location, Rack rail, Linear motor, Himalaya tunnel Abstract: Building Rikaze-Kathmandu Railway will change the broken road situation of Lasa-Rikaze Railway, activate the potential of Qingzang Railway, have Tibet as well as Lasa and Rikaze become the node of south Asia channel of “One Belt and One Road”, strengthen commercial trade and bilateral relations between China and Nepal. It is the shortest route for Rikaze-Kathmandu railway to go through Zhangmu port. By primary analysis, the feasible route should extend from the current Rikaze railway station, going through Qumei county, entering into the current G318 highway belt, then going through Jiding, Liuxiang and Resa, arriving Lazi. The route extends from Lazi, then goes through Jiacuola mountain by tunnel with 45km length, going through Jiacuo county and arriving Dingri. After Dingri, the route extends to west along with Pengqu river valley, going through Zhaguo, then arriving Gangga. Extending to southwest from Gangga, the route goes under Labujikang peak by a 42km tunnel, then arriving Yalai, then Nielamu and Zhangmu. The nature gradient between Nielamu and Zhangmu is 110‰, line mileage 20km, thus the rack rail technology or the linear motor driving should be considered for train to climb the steep slope more than 110‰. Another possible scheme is to build an 88km tunnel with a 28‰ gradient between Gangga and Zhangmu for going under Himalaya, so as to avoid the 110‰ steep slope between Nielamu-Zhangmu.
    [Show full text]
  • NEPAL Earthquake ECHO CRISIS FLASH No
    NEPAL Earthquake ECHO CRISIS FLASH No. 10 shortage Period covered 1. Map 25 April – 4 May 2015 Time of validity 18:00 (Kathmandu) – 12:15 (UTC) ECHO Field Office New Delhi – INDIA Number of dead (Government of Nepal): 7 276 Number of wounded (Government of Nepal): 14 362 2. Situation The death toll resulting from the earthquake which struck central Nepal on 25 April has risen to 7 276, with 14 362 injured (Government of Nepal-GoN figures, 4 May). It is anticipated that these figures will further increase as remote areas are becoming accessible for government officials and humanitarian actors. On 3 May, the GoN declared the USAR (Urban Search and Rescue) phase over; it is now paramount that the emergency humanitarian response is further scaled up to reach remote and most affected Village Development Committees (VDCs), ensuring speedy movement and delivery of relief items. According to UN estimates, up to 8 million people have been affected by the ECHO Emergency Contact earthquake. Over 54% of the deaths have been recorded in the districts of Tel.: +32 2 29 21112 Sindhupalchowk and Kathmandu, but there remain entire districts, such as Fax: +32 2 29 86651 Rasuwa, which have yet to be accessed. Approximately 2.8 million people are [email protected] believed to have been temporarily displaced from their homes (USAID Factsheet 7), though numbers are decreasing as people return home in the ECHO Crisis Flash No. 10 – NEPAL Earthquake Kathmandu Valley or are moving from there to their rural districts of origin. Over 10 700 houses have been reported destroyed, with over 14 700 damaged; the GoN estimates that over 200 000 houses have been destroyed and more than 188 000 damaged (GoN, 3 May).
    [Show full text]
  • Club Health Assessment MBR0087
    Club Health Assessment for District 325A1 through April 2021 Status Membership Reports Finance LCIF Current YTD YTD YTD YTD Member Avg. length Months Yrs. Since Months Donations Member Members Members Net Net Count 12 of service Since Last President Vice Since Last for current Club Club Charter Count Added Dropped Growth Growth% Months for dropped Last Officer Rotation President Activity Account Fiscal Number Name Date Ago members MMR *** Report Reported Report *** Balance Year **** Number of times If below If net loss If no When Number Notes the If no report on status quo 15 is greater report in 3 more than of officers thatin 12 months within last members than 20% months one year repeat do not haveappears in two years appears appears appears in appears in terms an active red Clubs less than two years old SC 138770 Bansbari 07/12/2019 Active 41 15 0 15 57.69% 26 0 N 1 $600.02 P,MC 138952 Bargachhi Green City 07/12/2019 Active 25 1 0 1 4.17% 24 4 N 5 142398 Biratnagar A One 08/09/2020 Active 32 32 0 32 100.00% 0 2 N 1 M,MC,SC 138747 Biratnagar Birat Medical 07/12/2019 Active 21 1 0 1 5.00% 20 3 N 3 90+ Days P,S,T,M,VP 138954 Biratnagar Capital City 07/12/2019 Active 20 0 0 0 0.00% 20 21 1 None N/R 90+ Days MC,SC M,MC,SC 140415 Biratnagar Entrepreneur 01/06/2020 Active 18 0 0 0 0.00% 20 10 2 R 10 90+ Days M 139007 Biratnagar Greater 07/12/2019 Active 31 8 3 5 19.23% 26 1 4 3 N 3 Exc Award (06/30/2020) VP 139016 Biratnagar Health Professional 07/12/2019 Active 26 4 1 3 13.04% 23 1 0 N 3 Exc Award (06/30/2020) 138394 Biratnagar Mahanagar
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation Report
    EVALUATION REPORT Nepal Earthquake Emergency Response Project SEPTEMBER 8, 2017 HURDEC PVT LTD, NEPAL Thasikhel, Lalitpur, Nepal Table of Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 4 A. Evaluation Context and Methodology ........................................................................ 4 B. Project Achievements ................................................................................................ 4 C. Good and Highly Appreciated Practices .................................................................... 6 D. Key Issues and Challenges ....................................................................................... 6 E. Lessons from the Project Experience ........................................................................ 7 F. Major Recommendations ........................................................................................... 7 1. Background and Context ................................................................................................... 9 2. Evaluation Objectives and Methodology .......................................................................... 10 3. Evaluation Findings ......................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Overall Findings ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Geographical Location • Map K • Latitudinal & Longitudinal Location on the Map
    Contents Geographical Location • Map k • Latitudinal & longitudinal location on the map. k r • Craft Pockets r o • Place / Village etc, with details of the distance from the nearest town or capital o w w Detailed Description of the craft i • History (reputation & traditional value of the craft) i k • Proof & evidences (related articles, newspaper columns, journals etc) k k • Raw Material k i i • Product S • Production ( Method / process / technique ) S Uniqueness Value of the Craft ŸEconomic Aspect Visual identity Profile of the Crafts People. r r • Crafts People Involved at Present (Family detail) Artisans profile in detail • Present Economic status a • Market Linkages (Any formal groups etc formed to produce or market the craft a Products) • Cost & Price • Annual Turnover h h Personal (of the craftsperson) i For the state (overall) i NGOs / Craft Clusters / Co operatives or Associations Acknowledgement of Sources of Information B B National Institute of Design-Outreach programme Protection and Development of Handicrafts of India under IPR / DC(H) 01 Geographical location SITAMARHI The district of Sitamarhi was k carved out of Muzaffarpur district k r on 11th December 1972. It is r o situated in the northern part of o w Bihar. Its headquarter is located at w i Dumra, five kilometers south of i k Sitamarhi. The district k k headquarter was shifted here after k i the town of Sitamarhi was i S devastated in one of the worst S ever earthquake in January 1934. Sitamarhi is a sacred place in Hindu mythology. It's history goes back to Treta Yug. Sita, the wife of Lord Rama sprang to life out of an earthern pot, when Raja Janak was ploughing the field somewhere near Sitamarhi to r r impress upon Lord Indra for rain.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Marriage in Humanitarian Settings
    POLICY BRIEF JUNE 2021 © UNICEF/UNI185604/Page Girls wash their hands with soap and spring water by the roadside in Dolakha District - one of the hardest-hit CHILD earthquake districts in Nepal. EARTHQUAKE- MARRIAGE AFFECTED DISTRICTS IN IN HUMANITARIAN NEPAL SETTINGS C onsistent with other countries in South households, the displacement As of 2019, Asia, Nepal has experienced declines lasted weeks or months, with some 7 per cent in rates of child marriage during the setting up temporary shelters next of Nepalese men aged last two decades, though it still has to their damaged houses. Others 20-24 in urban areas the second highest rate in the region. were displaced for years, and some – – and 14 per cent in rural areas – had been Within Nepal, higher rates of child especially young men -- chose to move married before age 18. marriage tend to correlate with permanently to Kathmandu or abroad. lower rates of education, rural setting, and lower socioeconomic This policy brief summarizes key 40 per cent status, which is historically tied to findings from two of the most of Nepalese women caste and ethnic discrimination. severely affected districts, aged 20–24 said that Sindhupalchowk and Dolakha, marriage was the main reason to discontinue In April and May of 2015, two major based on the report, Child Marriage their education. earthquakes and their aftershocks in Humanitarian Settings in South struck Nepal, triggered landslides Asia: Study Results from Bangladesh that devastated rural villages, and and Nepal. While the report covers damaged some of the most densely a wider range of aspects of child populated parts of Kathmandu.
    [Show full text]