DOCSLIB.ORG

The Real Economy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Real Economy THE REAL ECONOMY THE REAL ECONOMY ESSAYS IN ETHNOGRAPHIC THEORY Edited by Federico Neiburg and Jane I. Guyer Hau Books Chicago The Real Economy by Federico Neiburg & Jane I. Guyer, with support from the Instituto de Economia Real, is licensed under CC-BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode Cover and layout design: Daniele Meucci Typesetting: Prepress Plus (www.prepressplus.in) ISBN: 9781912808267 LCCN: 2019956202 Hau Books Chicago Distribution Center 11030 S. Langley Chicago, IL 60628 www.haubooks.com Hau Books is printed, marketed, and distributed by The University of Chicago Press. www.press.uchicago.edu Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper. Table of Contents Contributors vii introduction The real in the real economy 1 Federico Neiburg and Jane Guyer chapter one The live act of business and the culture of realization 27 Fabian Muniesa chapter two Deductions and counter-deductions in South Africa 47 Deborah James chapter three Resisting numbers: The favela as an (un)quantifiable reality 77 Eugênia Motta chapter four What is a ‘real’ transaction in high-frequency trading 103 Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra vi THE REAL ECONOMY chapter five Soybean, bricks, dollars, and the reality of money in Argentina 129 Mariana Luzzi and Ariel Wilkis chapter six A political anthropology of finance in cross-border investment in Shanghai 153 Horacio Ortiz chapter seven Corporate personhood and the competitive relation in antitrust 179 Gustavo Onto chapter eight Making workers real on a South African border farm 203 Maxim Bolt chapter nine How will we pay? Projective fictions and regimes of foresight in US college finance 229 Caitlin Zaloom chapter ten Smuggling realities: On numbers, borders, and performances 253 Fernando Rabossi afterword The method of the real: What do we intend with ethnographic infrastructure? 283 Bill Maurer Contributors Maxim Bolt is a Reader in Anthropology and African Studies at the University of Birmingham, UK, and a Research Associate at the University of the Witwa- tersrand, South Africa. His first book, Zimbabwe’s migrants and South Africa’s border farms: The roots of impermanence (2015), explores wage labor in a place of transience and informal livelihoods. Jane I. Guyer is Professor Emerita at Johns Hopkins University. A graduate of the London School of Economics (1965) and the University of Rochester (1972), she undertook field research projects on economic life in Nigeria and Cameroon. She has held faculty appointments at Harvard, Boston, and North- western Universities. At Northwestern, she was Director of the Program of African Studies (1994–2001). Book publications include Family and farm in Southern Cameroon (1984), An African niche economy (1997), Marginal gains: Monetary transactions in Atlantic Africa (2004), Legacies, logics, logistics (2016), and a new translation of Marcel Mauss, The gift (Expanded Edition, 2016). Deborah James is Professor of Anthropology at London School of Economics. She is the author of Money from nothing: Indebtedness and aspiration in South Africa (2015), which documents the precarious nature of both the aspirations of upward mobility and the economic relations of debt that sustain the newly upwardly mobile in that country. Other books include Gaining ground? “Rights” viii THE REAL ECONOMY and “property” in South African land reform (2006) and Songs of the women mi- grants: Performance and identity in South Africa (1999). Mariana Luzzi is Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of General Sarmiento (Argentina) and a researcher at Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET). She holds a PhD in Sociology from the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS-Paris). She has conducted research on Argentina’s economic crisis of 2001–2, on community currencies experiments, and on the conflicts over economic reparations to the victims of State Terrorism in Argentina. She is currently doing research on the uses and meanings of the US dollar in Argentina’s economy. Bill Maurer is Professor of Anthropology and Law and Dean of Social Sci- ences at the University of California—Irvine. He is also the Director of the In- stitute for Money, Technology, and Financial Inclusion (www.imtfi.uci.edu). He conducts research on law, property, money, and finance, focusing on the tech- nological infrastructures and social relations of exchange and payment. He has particular expertise in emerging, alternative, and experimental forms of money and finance, and their legal implications. Eugênia Motta has a Postdoctoral Fellowship (PNPD/Capes) and is Assistant Professor in the Sociology Graduate Program of the Institute of Social and Po- litical Studies (IESP) of the State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ). Fabian Muniesa is a researcher at the Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation, École des Mines de Paris (Mines ParisTech, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR 9217). He studies the culture of business performance and the politics of economic expertise. He is the author of The provoked economy: Economic reality and the performative turn (2014) and the coauthor of Capitalization: A cultural guide (2017). Federico Neiburg is Professor in Social Anthropology at the Museu Nacional, Universidad Federal do Rio de Janeiro. He is also lead researcher for the Brazil- ian National Research Council (CNPq) and the coordinator of the Center for Research in Culture and Economy (NuCEC, www.nucec.net). Neiburg has held many fellowships and awards for his work including the Wenner Gren Founda- tion for Anthropological Research, the John Simon Guggenheim Foundation, Contributors ix and the Institute for Advanced Study (Princeton). He has done fieldwork in México, Argentina, Brazil, and the Republic of Haiti. His most recent publi- cations are Conversas Etnográficas Haitianas (2019) and The cultural history of money in the age of Empire (edited with Nigel Dodd, 2019). Gustavo Onto is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Graduate Program in Sociol- ogy and Anthropology of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. He is also an associate researcher of the Center for Research on Culture and Economy (NuCEC), where he coordinates the Anthropology of Finance Study Group (GEAF) in partnership with the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commis- sion (BSEC). He was a visiting researcher at the École Normale Supérieure (ENS) in Paris and at Copenhagen Business School. He is also a member of the Behavioural Studies Group of the Brazilian SEC and a collaborator on the website Estudios de la Economia (http://estudiosdelaeconomia.wordpress. com). Horacio Ortiz is associate professor of the Research Institute of Anthropology, East China Normal University, and researcher at Université Paris-Dauphine, PSL Research University, CNRS, IRISSO. He graduated from Sciences Po, Paris, obtained an MA in philosophy from the New School for Social Research, New York, and a PhD in social anthropology from the Ecole de hautes études en sciences sociales, Paris. His research focuses on the global financial industry from a perspective of political anthropology. He is the author of Valeur financière et vérité: Enquête d’anthropologie politique sur l’évaluation des entreprises cotées en bourse (2014). Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra is Assistant Professor in Sociology at University of California—San Diego and Research Fellow at the University of Edinburgh. Trained in physics (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico) and Science and Technology Studies (University of Edinburgh), he is author of Automating finance: Infrastructures, engineers, and the making of electronic markets (2019). Fernando Rabossi is Professor of Cultural Anthropology at the Federal Uni- versity of Rio de Janeiro. He coordinates the graduate program in Sociology and Anthropology (PPGSA) at the same university. He is author of En las calles de Ciudad del Este: Una etnografía del comercio de frontera (2008). His re- search is focused on the relation between rules and economic practices, dealing x THE REAL ECONOMY with informal economies, informal politics, markets, borders, mobility, and circulation. Ariel Wilkis is Researcher at Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET) and Dean of the Instituto de Altos Estudios So- ciales, Universidad de San Martín (IDAES-UNSAM). His most recent books are The moral power of money: Morality and economy in the life of urban poor (2017) and Las sospechas del dinero: Moral y economía en la vida popular (2013). He has edited El poder de (e)valuar (2018) and El Laberinto de las finanzas. Nuevos es- tudios sociales de la economía (with Alexandre Roig, 2015). His book The moral power of money received “honorable mention” for the Best Book Award 2016–17 by the American Sociological Association Section on Economic Sociology (Zelizer Award). A French version will be published by École de Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales in 2020. Caitlin Zaloom is a cultural anthropologist and Associate Professor of Social and Cultural Analysis at NYU. Her book Indebted: How families make college work at any cost (2019) examines how the struggle to pay for college transforms family relationships and defines middle-class life in America today. Zaloom has held many fellowships and awards for her work, including from the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford, the Russell Sage Foundation, and the National Science Foundation. She is also the author of Out of the pits: Traders and technology from Chicago to London (2006) and is Editor in Chief of Public Books.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nber Working Paper Series Financial Markets and The
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES FINANCIAL MARKETS AND THE REAL ECONOMY John H. Cochrane Working Paper 11193 http://www.nber.org/papers/w11193 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 March 2005 This review will introduce a volume by the same title in the Edward Elgar series “The International Library of Critical Writings in Financial Economics” edited by Richard Roll. I encourage comments. Please write promptly so I can include your comments in the final version. I gratefully acknowledge research support from the NSF in a grant administered by the NBER and from the CRSP. I thank Monika Piazzesi and Motohiro Yogo for comments. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. © 2005 by John H. Cochrane. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Financial Markets and the Real Economy John H. Cochrane NBER Working Paper No. 11193 March 2005, Revised September 2006 JEL No. G1, E3 ABSTRACT I survey work on the intersection between macroeconomics and finance. The challenge is to find the right measure of "bad times," rises in the marginal value of wealth, so that we can understand high average returns or low prices as compensation for assets' tendency to pay off poorly in "bad times." I survey the literature, covering the time-series and cross-sectional facts, the equity premium, consumption-based models, general equilibrium models, and labor income/idiosyncratic risk approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Nominal Rigidity and Some New Evidence on the New Keynesian Theory of the Output-Inflation Tradeoff Rongrong Sun1
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Nominal Rigidity and Some New Evidence on the New Keynesian Theory of the Output-Inflation Tradeoff Sun, Rongrong University of Wuppertal 2012 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/45021/ MPRA Paper No. 45021, posted 15 Mar 2013 06:19 UTC Nominal Rigidity and Some New Evidence on the New Keynesian Theory of the Output-Inflation Tradeoff Rongrong Sun1 Abstract: This paper develops a series of tests to check whether the New Keynesian nominal rigidity hypothesis on the output-inflation tradeoff withstands new evidence. In so doing, I summarize and evaluate different estimation methods that have been applied in the literature to address this hypothesis. Both cross-country and over-time variations in the output-inflation tradeoff are checked with the tests that differentiate the effects on the tradeoff that are attributable to nominal rigidity (the New Keynesian argument) from those ascribable to variance in nominal growth (the alternative new classical explanation). I find that in line with the New Keynesian hypothesis, nominal rigidity is an important determinant of the tradeoff. Given less rigid prices in high-inflation environments, changes in nominal demand are transmitted to quicker and larger movements in prices and lead to smaller fluctuations in the real economy. The tradeoff between output and inflation is hence smaller. Key words: the output-inflation tradeoff, nominal rigidity, trend inflation, aggregate variability JEL-Classification: E31, E32, E61 1 Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal, [email protected]. I would like to thank Katrin Heinrichs, Jan Klingelhöfer, Ronald Schettkat and the seminar (conference) participants at the Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, the DIW Macroeconometric Workshop 2009, the 2011 meeting of the Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES) and the 26th Annual Congress of European Economic Association (EEA), 2011 Oslo for their helpful comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Monetary Theory: a Marxist Critique
    Class, Race and Corporate Power Volume 7 Issue 1 Article 1 2019 Modern Monetary Theory: A Marxist Critique Michael Roberts [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower Part of the Economics Commons Recommended Citation Roberts, Michael (2019) "Modern Monetary Theory: A Marxist Critique," Class, Race and Corporate Power: Vol. 7 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. DOI: 10.25148/CRCP.7.1.008316 Available at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower/vol7/iss1/1 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts, Sciences & Education at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Class, Race and Corporate Power by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Modern Monetary Theory: A Marxist Critique Abstract Compiled from a series of blog posts which can be found at "The Next Recession." Modern monetary theory (MMT) has become flavor of the time among many leftist economic views in recent years. MMT has some traction in the left as it appears to offer theoretical support for policies of fiscal spending funded yb central bank money and running up budget deficits and public debt without earf of crises – and thus backing policies of government spending on infrastructure projects, job creation and industry in direct contrast to neoliberal mainstream policies of austerity and minimal government intervention. Here I will offer my view on the worth of MMT and its policy implications for the labor movement. First, I’ll try and give broad outline to bring out the similarities and difference with Marx’s monetary theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Paper Series No 2016/23
    University of Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper Series No 2016/23 Constitution-making and Political Settlements in Times of Transition Christine Bell Professor of Constitutional Law - University of Edinburgh, School of Law [email protected] Charmaine Rodrigues PhD candidate at the University of Melbourne Law School. Silvia Suteu Lecturer in Public Law - University College London Faculty of Laws - [email protected] Tom Gerald Daly Edinburgh Centre for Constitutional Law Jenna Sapiano University of St Andrews - [email protected] To appear in: Global Constitutionalism, special section, forthcoming 2017. This text may be downloaded for personal research purposes only. Any additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copy or electronically, requires the consent of the author(s). If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the name(s) of the author(s), the title, the number, and the working paper series © 2016 Christine Bell, Charmaine Rodrigues, Silvia Suteu, Tom Gerald Daly and Jenna Sapiano Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper Series University of Edinburgh Abstract This special section is an output of the Political Settlement Research Programme – PSRP (www.politicalsettlements.org). The PSRP examines how to use peace processes to create inclusive and open political settlements. This special issue addresses in particular constitution-making and political settlements in times of transition. We consider how constitutional design and adjudication must be understood to have a specific political role in constructing and enabling a political settlement, as in the shared understandings as to how power is to be held and exercised, that forms the political constitution which the constitution attempts to institutionalised.
    [Show full text]
  • Nber Working Paper Series David Laidler On
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES DAVID LAIDLER ON MONETARISM Michael Bordo Anna J. Schwartz Working Paper 12593 http://www.nber.org/papers/w12593 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 October 2006 This paper has been prepared for the Festschrift in Honor of David Laidler, University of Western Ontario, August 18-20, 2006. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. © 2006 by Michael Bordo and Anna J. Schwartz. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. David Laidler on Monetarism Michael Bordo and Anna J. Schwartz NBER Working Paper No. 12593 October 2006 JEL No. E00,E50 ABSTRACT David Laidler has been a major player in the development of the monetarist tradition. As the monetarist approach lost influence on policy makers he kept defending the importance of many of its principles. In this paper we survey and assess the impact on monetary economics of Laidler's work on the demand for money and the quantity theory of money; the transmission mechanism on the link between money and nominal income; the Phillips Curve; the monetary approach to the balance of payments; and monetary policy. Michael Bordo Faculty of Economics Cambridge University Austin Robinson Building Siegwick Avenue Cambridge ENGLAND CD3, 9DD and NBER [email protected] Anna J. Schwartz NBER 365 Fifth Ave, 5th Floor New York, NY 10016-4309 and NBER [email protected] 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Neo-Classical Economics: a Trail of Economic Destruction Since the 1970S Erik S
    real-world economics review, issue no. 60 Neo-classical economics: A trail of economic destruction since the 1970s Erik S. Reinert [The Other Canon Foundation, Norway] Copyright: Erik S. Reinert, 2012 You may post comments on this paper at http://rwer.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/rwer-issue-60/ ‘...soon or late, it is ideas, not vested interests, which are dangerous for good or evil’. John Maynard Keynes, closing words of The General Theory (1936). Abstract This paper argues that the international financial crisis is just the last in a series of economic calamities produced by a type of theory that converted the economics profession from a study of real world phenomena into what in the end became mathematized ideology. While the crises themselves started by halving real wages in many countries in the economic periphery, in Latin America in the late 1970s, their origins are found in economic theory in the 1950s when empirical reality became academically unfashionable. About half way in the destructive path of this theoretical tsunami – from its origins in the world periphery in the 1970s until today’s financial meltdowns – we find the destruction of the productive capacity of the Second World, the former Soviet Union. Now the chickens are coming home to roost: wealth and welfare destruction is increasingly hitting the First World itself: Europe and the United States. This paper argues that it is necessary to see these developments as one continuous process over more than three decades of applying neoclassical economics and neo-liberal economic policies that destroyed, rather than created, real wages and wealth.
    [Show full text]
  • “Modern” Economics: Engineering and Ideology
    Working Paper No. 62/01 The formation of “Modern” Economics: Engineering and Ideology Mary Morgan © Mary Morgan Department of Economic History London School of Economics May 2001 Department of Economic History London School of Economics Houghton Street London, WC2A 2AE Tel: +44 (0)20 7955 7081 Fax: +44 (0)20 7955 7730 Additional copies of this working paper are available at a cost of £2.50. Cheques should be made payable to ‘Department of Economic History, LSE’ and sent to the Economic History Department Secretary. LSE, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK. 2 The Formation of “Modern” Economics: Engineering and Ideology Mary S. Morgan* Economics has always had two connected faces in its Western tradition. In Adam Smith's eighteenth century, as in John Stuart Mill's nineteenth, these might be described as the science of political economy and the art of economic governance. The former aimed to describe the workings of the economy and reveal its governing laws while the latter was concerned with using that knowledge to fashion economic policy. In the twentieth century these two aspects have more often been contrasted as positive and normative economics. The continuity of these dual interests masks differences in the way that economics has been both constituted and practiced in the twentieth century when these two aspects of economics became integrated in a particular way. Originally a verbally expressed body of scientific law-like doctrines and associated policy arts, in the twentieth century these two wings of economics became conjoined by a set of technologies routinely and widely used within the practice of economics in both its scientific and policy domains.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Debt Booms and the Real Economy: Do the Benefits Outweigh the Costs?
    Private Debt Booms and the Real Economy: Do the Benefits Outweigh the Costs? Emil Vernery Prepared for the INET Initiative on Private Debt August 2019 Abstract Probably not. Economic development coincides with rising private debt-to-GDP. This partly reflects the economic benefits of credit deep- ening, which facilitates a better allocation of savings towards productive investment. However, private debt booms, episodes of rapid expansion in private debt-to-GDP, systemically predict growth slowdowns that re- sult in lower real GDP. Debt booms distort the economy by boosting demand instead of productive capacity and by fueling asset price booms. These booms leave in their wake private debt overhang, banking sec- tor distress, and an overvalued real exchange rate. Private debt booms are thus distinct from credit deepening episodes, and the costs of these booms likely outweigh the benefits. yMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management; [email protected] thank Holger Mueller, Karsten M¨uller,Moritz Schularick, and Ole Risager for valuable comments and Fanwen Zhu for outstanding research assistance. 1 1 Introduction Private debt booms are episodes of rapid expansion in credit to households and firms. These booms have been playing an increasingly prominent role in economic fluctuations over the past few decades. A rapid expansion in debt can reflect structural improvements in the financial sector's ability to intermediate funds towards productive investment or an acceleration in productivity growth. Thus, private debt booms may part of the road to financial and economic development through the beneficial effects of credit deepening. However, debt booms have also been followed by growth slowdowns and severe financial crises.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Functions of Law in Modern Society Featured
    Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 23 Issue 2 Article 3 1972 Major Functions of Law in Modern Society Featured David A. Funk Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation David A. Funk, Major Functions of Law in Modern Society Featured, 23 Case W. Rsrv. L. Rev. 257 (1972) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol23/iss2/3 This Featured is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Law Review by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 1972] Major Functions of Law in Modern Society* David A. Funk Jurisprudentialwriting has often failed to examine extensively the important question of the purposes or functions of law. The author sug- gests that such an inquiry implies a relationship between law and some "and-in-view." He selects social utility in attaining an ideal modern Western European society in constructing the theoretical framework for his inquiry. He then lists and explicates seven maJor functions of law in¢ this sense and examines their interrelationshipsin preparationfor empiri- cal research. In conclusion he even suggests how existing empirical studies may test the adequacy of this theoretical framework. I. THE METALANGUAGE AND GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS N THE PURSUIT of jurisprudential understanding, legal phi- losophers have more often dealt with what law is and what is good law than the third of the fundamental issues of jurisprudence what law is for.2 This does not mean that the importance of this line of inquiry has been over- looked.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spectre of Monetarism
    The Spectre of Monetarism Speech given by Mark Carney Governor of the Bank of England Roscoe Lecture Liverpool John Moores University 5 December 2016 I am grateful to Ben Nelson and Iain de Weymarn for their assistance in preparing these remarks, and to Phil Bunn, Daniel Durling, Alastair Firrell, Jennifer Nemeth, Alice Owen, James Oxley, Claire Chambers, Alice Pugh, Paul Robinson, Carlos Van Hombeeck, and Chris Yeates for background analysis and research. 1 All speeches are available online at www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Pages/speeches/default.aspx Real incomes falling for a decade. The legacy of a searing financial crisis weighing on confidence and growth. The very nature of work disrupted by a technological revolution. This was the middle of the 19th century. Liverpool was in the midst of a golden age; its Custom House was the national Exchequer’s biggest source of revenue. And Karl Marx was scribbling in the British Library, warning of a spectre haunting Europe, the spectre of communism. We meet today during the first lost decade since the 1860s. In the wake of a global financial crisis. And in the midst of a technological revolution that is once again changing the nature of work. Substitute Northern Rock for Overend Gurney; Uber and machine learning for the Spinning Jenny and the steam engine; and Twitter for the telegraph; and you have dynamics that echo those of 150 years ago. Then the villains were the capitalists. Should they today be the central bankers? Are their flights of fancy promoting stagnation and inequality? Does the spectre of monetarism haunt our economies?i These are serious charges, based on real anxieties.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Neoclassical Synthesis and the Role of Monetary Policy
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1997, Volume 12 Volume Author/Editor: Ben S. Bernanke and Julio Rotemberg Volume Publisher: MIT Press Volume ISBN: 0-262-02435-7 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/bern97-1 Publication Date: January 1997 Chapter Title: The New Neoclassical Synthesis and the Role of Monetary Policy Chapter Author: Marvin Goodfriend, Robert King Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c11040 Chapter pages in book: (p. 231 - 296) Marvin Goodfriendand RobertG. King FEDERAL RESERVEBANK OF RICHMOND AND UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA; AND UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA, NBER, AND FEDERAL RESERVEBANK OF RICHMOND The New Neoclassical Synthesis and the Role of Monetary Policy 1. Introduction It is common for macroeconomics to be portrayed as a field in intellectual disarray, with major and persistent disagreements about methodology and substance between competing camps of researchers. One frequently discussed measure of disarray is the distance between the flexible price models of the new classical macroeconomics and real-business-cycle (RBC) analysis, in which monetary policy is essentially unimportant for real activity, and the sticky-price models of the New Keynesian econom- ics, in which monetary policy is viewed as central to the evolution of real activity. For policymakers and the economists that advise them, this perceived intellectual disarray makes it difficult to employ recent and ongoing developments in macroeconomics. The intellectual currents of the last ten years are, however, subject to a very different interpretation: macroeconomics is moving toward a New NeoclassicalSynthesis. In the 1960s, the original synthesis involved a com- mitment to three-sometimes conflicting-principles: a desire to pro- vide practical macroeconomic policy advice, a belief that short-run price stickiness was at the root of economic fluctuations, and a commitment to modeling macroeconomic behavior using the same optimization ap- proach commonly employed in microeconomics.
    [Show full text]
  • Financing the Capital Development of the Economy: a Keynes-Schumpeter-Minsky Synthesis
    Working Paper No. 837 Financing the Capital Development of the Economy: A Keynes-Schumpeter-Minsky Synthesis by Mariana Mazzucato* University of Sussex L. Randall Wray† Levy Economics Institute of Bard College May 2015 * [email protected] † [email protected] This paper was prepared for the project “Financing Innovation: An Application of a Keynes-Schumpeter- Minsky Synthesis,” funded in part by the Institute for New Economic Thinking, INET grant no. IN012-00036, administered through the Levy Economics Institute of Bard College; Mariana Mazzucato (Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex) and L. Randall Wray (Levy Institute) are the project’s co-principal investigators. The authors thank INET, SPRU, and the Levy Institute for support of this research. The Levy Economics Institute Working Paper Collection presents research in progress by Levy Institute scholars and conference participants. The purpose of the series is to disseminate ideas to and elicit comments from academics and professionals. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, founded in 1986, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, independently funded research organization devoted to public service. Through scholarship and economic research it generates viable, effective public policy responses to important economic problems that profoundly affect the quality of life in the United States and abroad. Levy Economics Institute P.O. Box 5000 Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504-5000 http://www.levyinstitute.org Copyright © Levy Economics Institute 2015 All rights reserved ISSN 1547-366X Abstract This paper discusses the role that finance plays in promoting the capital development of the economy, with particular emphasis on the current situation of the United States and the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]