March 1973 1 - Year Averaged in the 1960'S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

March 1973 1 - Year Averaged in the 1960'S This publication was digitized and made available by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas' Historical Library ([email protected]) Natural Gas- Higher Prices Might Help Slow the Growing Shortage - Just how critical the shortage in per thousand and maybe as much however, is in areas that would be na~ural gas has become was amply as $1 or more. And even with tech­ hard to explore and develop. About Pdi?Inted up this winter. Not only nological advances, it would take 14 percent is at depths of over d prices move sharply upward years to build the plant capacity 15,000 feet. About 20 percent is ~t suppliers were simply unable needed to provide an effective sup­ under waters offshore. And some n;eet the demand in many areas, plement to natural gas reserves. 28 percent is in Alaska. But even haVIng to cut off the flow to some The most direct solution to the so, the estimate is reassuring. users. Plants and schools had to problem in the long run, then-bar­ Some Government estimates are close, and hospitals and power ring adequate substitution-is an even more promising. One study plants had to shift to other fuels. increase in the rate of discovery of sets the nation's potential for in­ This Was true even in Texas new reserves. By all estimates, creasing its proved reserves at more source of more than a third ~f the there are still ample reserves to be than 2,000 trillion cubic feet. nation's natural gas. found in this country. Looking for further increases in t !f anything, with demand for One industry estimate has fixed exploration, the Federal Power his convenient, clean-burning fuel the nation's undiscovered gas at Commission foresees a reversal in Continuing to rise the shortage is 1,178 trillion cubic feet-50 times the downtrend that brought new apt to become mo~e acute. Con­ more gas than is now marketed. discoveries in 1970 to only two­ sUmption reached about 23 trillion Over 60 percent of this potential, thirds of the 17 trillion cubic feet a ~~bic feet in 1971, for example, and h I~f new discoveries totaling about 2;9 t~a~, proved reserves fell to 1 tnllion cubic feet-14 trillion Development of pipelines ess than four years before. sets off boom in use of gas ... Y Drilling picked up somewhat last ear. But it can take four or five TRILLION CUBIC FEET Years for new reserves to affect the 25---------------------------------------- market supply. By the time these newdi. sCoveries have been brought Into actual production, annual con­ sumth p t·Ion may be running more an 30 trillion cubic feet. Other SOurces of gas are obvi­ f~SlY required. For the near future, Ports probably offer the only ~1ans of obtaining gas in sufficient ? urnes. Imported gas is expen- m'SIVe ho wever. The huge mvest-. a ents and costs required to liquefy n d transport natural gas could rUSh consumer prices for imports f~e ~ore than $1 per thousand cubic Of about twice the average price fuas now produced domestically. b 1 Ventually, synthetic gas could c: ~anufactured from other hydro­ o I I I I I no~o o~s. But without a major tech­ 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 not ~Ical breakthrough, gas could SOURCE: U.S. Bureau of Mines fu I e manufactured from other e s for sale at less than 70 cents nUs'llless Review I March 1973 1 - year averaged in the 1960's. The With construction of large inter­ ceived manufactured, mixed, or commission's projection shows dis­ state pipelines, the picture began liquid petroleum gas through util­ coveries returning to this average to change-and rapidly. When lines ity mains, by the midsixties fewer level by about 1980. laid during World War II to carry than one out of ten users was re­ The problem, of course, is oil from the Southwest to the ceiving anything but natural gas. whether even that rate would ever North and Northeast were C\!)l'l­ Even with this rapid expansion be adequate again. Demand for verted to gas after the war, a vast in the market for natural gas, how­ natural gas has been going up new market was already waiting. ever, there was still little need for sharply for 20 years. And with the Suppliers had only to capture an incentive to explore for more gas. increases in both energy needs and existing market from manufactured One reason was the vastness of the concern over pollution problems, gas. Distribution systems were al­ reserves built up in the search for the outlook is for demand to rise ready installed to deliver manufac­ oil at a time when there were still even faster. tured gas, and users were equipped few opportunities to market gas. In to burn gas. Before the advance of Matter of incentives 1946, for example-when demand this inexpensive wonder fuel, other for natural gas was already clearly Basic to the matter of increasing heating fuels rapidly retreated. on the rise-there were still enough reserves, however, is the problem of The lower price of natural gas and proved reserves to meet production providing incentives for bearing the the need to keep pipelines flowing needs for at least 39 years. high costs and enormous risks of at capacity even allowed suppliers Large reserves continued to hang exploring for gas. In a very real to shoulder their way int0 the over the market for several years. sense, there have never been many market for low-value boiler fuel. Even after reserves began nosing incentives to stimulate production By the midfifties, almost every downward, putting upward pres­ of natural gas-and certainly not major population center was con­ sure on prices, there was little con­ any long-term incentives. nected with oil fields in the South­ cern over the incentives to look for , Based originally on what was west. And where as late as the start new reserves. By the time the issue until very recent years a fairly low­ of the 1950's at least four out of of incentives was raised, the gas in- I value byproduct of the oil industry, ten of the nation's gas users re- dustry was caught in a cost-price natural gas did not emerge as a ma­ jor industry in its own right until pipelines were laid to connect some of the world's largest oil fields in . .. but reserves taper oft, the Southwest with large fuel mar­ dropping relative to production kets in the North and Northeast. Until transmission lines were TRILLION CUBIC FEET YEARS built, the enormous pools of gas 300 ------------------------------__________ 45 being discovered in the oil fields of Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, and later New Mexico were isolated from large markets. Early in the development of these fields, gas was 200 - often flared or vented to the atmo­ - 30 sphere simply to get rid of it. Always a highly desirable fuel if it could be made available, some gas was sold to local utilities. But - 20 because of its great abundance and 100 - the small markets served, prices were cheap, providing far more in­ centive for people in the Southwest ----------CRiTiCALLEVEL--------- - 10 to consume gas than to produce it. Large quantities went, for example, into such low-value uses as the manufacturing of carbon black. O-rl----'I-----rl----,lr---~I----~I o And residential and commercial 1946 1951 1956 1961 1966 1971 users in many local markets re­ SOURCE: American Gas Association ceived unmetered service. 2 - squeeze that made interest in ex­ serves in the continental United ket conditions totally unrelated to ploratory drilling hard to arouse. States are rapidly approaching that the demand for natural gas. level. From a total 14.6 times Other problems bearing on the Cost-price squeeze greater than production in 1968, re­ rate of withdrawal grow out of the Costs of drilling oil and gas wells in serves fell to 11.9 times production need to protect the rights of others 1971, for example, averaged 85 per­ in 1970. to a share in the discovery. Be­ cent higher than in 1956. But For more than two decades after cause a productive field is ordinar­ prices for natural gas were only 37 World War II, additions to reserves ily large enough to cross the land percent higher, and oil prices were usually exceeded the increases in of many owners, withdrawals must up only 17 percent. consumption. But although re­ be regulated to protect the interest ,The result was a significant de­ serves were rising, consumption of everyone with a property right clIne in drilling. By 1971, the num­ was growing fast enough to force a in the underground reservoir. ber of wells drilled had dropped to continuous decline in reserves rela­ Without regulation, a well on one less than half the number drilled in tive to the demands on them. And property might deplete the oil and 1956. And with all the pressure for since 1968, reserves have been ex­ gas under neighboring properties. th7 discovery of new reserves, only panding only about half as fast as And still other withdrawal prob­ a ~ttle more than half as many withdrawals, forcing reserve-to­ lems relate to holding back produc­ WIldcat wells were drilled in the production ratios in some areas be­ tion to keep wells from choking up search for new fields. low the 10-to-1Ievel. with sand. Often, when wells are , W~th exploration being pushed There are several reasons for as­ produced too fast, sand begins Into Increasingly difficult locations, signing crucial importance to a blocking off the flow, creating the ~osts are bound to increase still fur- 10-to-1 ratio.
Recommended publications
  • Hayghe, Howard TITLE Families and the Rise of Working Wives--An Overview
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 131 235 CE 008 295 AUTHOR Hayghe, Howard TITLE Families and the Rise of Working Wives--an Overview. Special Labor Force Report 189. INSTITUTION Bureau of Labor Statistics (DOL), Washington, D.C., PUB DATE 76 NOTE 12p.; Reprint from Monthly Labor Review; May 1976 EDRS PRICE MF-=0.83 HC-81.67 Plus'Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Birth Rate; Business Cycles; Economic Climate; *Eiployment Trends; *Family (Sociological Unit); *Labor Force; *Manpower Needs; National Surveys; Population Trends; Statistical Surveys; *Working Women IDENTIFIERS United States ABSTRACT Past and current trénds in the growth of families with two workers or more are examined in this article. It discusses such subjects as influence of trends in fertility On the growth of these families, the relation between husbands' and wives' occupations, and some of the impact of the recession and inflation on these families. Tables and statistical data are included to support content. (WL) Families and the Rise of Working Wives an Overview Special Labor Force Report 189 U.S. DEPARTMENT Of LABOR Bureau Of Labor Statistics Unless identified as copyrighted, articles and tabulations in this publication are in the public domain and may be reproduced without permissionof the 'Federal government. Please credit the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Following is a list of reprints of Special Labor Force Reports which have been published in the Monthly Labor Review since February 1970. Copies may be obtained, while the supply lasts, upon request to the Bureya u of Labor Statistic or to any of its regional offices. Number 151 Employment of Recent College Graduates, October 1971 152 Changes in the Employment Situation in 1972 153 Marital and Family Characteristics of the Labor Force, March 1972 • 154 Children of Working Mothera, March 1973 155 Employment of High School Graduates and Dropouts, October 1972 156 The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal No. 1918 - John Marshall STUART, Jr
    Appeal No. 1918 - John Marshall STUART, Jr. v. US - 30 March, 1973 ________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF MERCHANT MARINER'S DOCUMENT NO. Z-1277892 AND ALL OTHER SEAMAN'S DOCUMENTS Issued to:John Marshall STUART, Jr. DECISION OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 1918 John Marshall STUART, Jr. This appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239b and Title 46 Code Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 26 March 1970, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, holder of the document above captioned, was on 19 March 1969 convicted by a court of record at Balboa, Canal Zone, for violation of a narcotic drug law of the zone, possession of marijuana. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by Professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence records of the Magistrate's Court of Balboa, Canal Zone. In defense, Appellant offered no evidence. file:////hqsms-lawdb/users/KnowledgeManagementD...20&%20R%201680%20-%201979/1918%20-%20STUART.htm (1 of 9) [02/10/2011 10:27:55 AM] Appeal No. 1918 - John Marshall STUART, Jr. v. US - 30 March, 1973 At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved.
    [Show full text]
  • Marital and Family Characteristics of Workers, March 1973
    DOCUMEMT RESUME ED 096 517 CE 002 150 TITLE Marital and FamilyCharacteristics of Workers, March 1973. INSTITUTICN Bureau of LaborStatistics (DOL), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Aug 73 NOTE 6p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.75 HC-61.50 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS Employment; *EmploymentStatistics; Females; Housewives; *Labor Force; LaborSupply; dales; *Manpower Utilization;Marital Status; Mothers; *Working Women ABSTRACT This brief report presentsand discusses statistics and family characteristicsof workers in 1973[e.g., on the marital among nearly 40 million married menand 20 million married women were the 88 million personlabor force, and of the1.7 million increase in the labor force,three-quarters consisted ofmarried women (34 percent), single men (24percent) , and single women(15 percent)]. Family statistics are reviewed,and tables show employmentstatus of labor persons 16 yearsold and over by maritalstatus, sex, and race; force participation rolesof warted women(husband present) by presence and age ofchildren; and employmentstatus of family head and other family membersby race. (NH) u- Su--ary/SPECIAL LABOR V U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Bureau of Labor Statistics FORCE REPORTk' 1J U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEENREPRO DUCE° EXACTLY AS RECEIVEDFROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATIONORIGIN ATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRE SENT OFFICIAL NATIONAL INSTITUTEOF EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY -Maritaland Family Characteristics ofWorkers, March 1973 For every two married men in the labor force in March 1973,one married woman was also working or looking for work.Nearly 40 mil- lion married men and 20 million marriedwomen were among the 88 million persons in the labor force.There were almost as many workers who had never married-19 million- -as married women, and 10 million were widowed, divorced, or separated persons.
    [Show full text]
  • Protocol Relating to an Amendment to the Convention on International Civil Aviation
    PROTOCOL RELATING TO AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ARTICLE 56, SIGNED AT VIENNA ON 7 JULY 1971 Entry into force: The Protocol entered into force on 19 December 1974. Status: 136 parties. State Date of deposit of instrument of ratification Algeria 2 February 1977 Andorra (5) 25 February 2001 Angola 10 April 1977 Antigua and Barbuda 17 October 1988 Argentina 18 August 1972 Australia 4 March 1974 Austria 10 September 1973 Bahrain 1 November 1971 Barbados 6 January 1972 Belarus 24 July 1996 Belgium 16 February 1972 Benin 30 March 2004 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 30 December 1974 Bosnia and Herzegovina 7 March 1995 Botswana 28 March 2001 Brazil 17 December 1971 Brunei Darussalam 25 August 2000 Bulgaria 12 April 1972 Burkina Faso 15 June 1992 Cameroon 8 August 1972 Canada 3 December 1971 Chad 2 March 1973 Chile 6 September 1972 China (1) 28 February 1974 Congo 13 November 1978 Cook Islands 29 August 2005 Croatia 5 October 1993 Cuba 3 January 1975 Cyprus 5 July 1989 Czech Republic 15 April 1993 Democratic People’s Republic of Korea 27 June 1978 Democratic Republic of the Congo 22 January 1973 Denmark 10 September 1971 Dominica (12) 14 March 2019 Dominican Republic 30 May 1972 Ecuador 2 May 1975 Egypt 17 July 1972 El Salvador 13 February 1980 Eritrea 6 June 1995 Estonia 21 August 1992 Eswatini 31 January 1974 Ethiopia 9 September 1971 Finland 7 October 1971 France 13 September 1972 Gabon 10 January 1973 Gambia 25 January 1978 Germany (2) 16 September 1977 Greece 15 November 1971 Guatemala 11 February 1974
    [Show full text]
  • 26/March 1973 TARIFFS and TRADE Limited Distribution
    GENERAL AGREEMENT ON 26/March 1973 TARIFFS AND TRADE Limited Distribution TRADE ARRANGEMENTS BETWEENINDIA, THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT AND YUGOSLAVIA Decision of 22 March 19732 Considering that the CONTRACTING PARTIES, by the Decision of 14 November 19682, agreed that the Governments of India, the Arab Republic of Egypt and Yugoslavia (hereinafter referred to as the "participating States") may implement, subject to specified conditions and procedures, the Trade Expansion and Economic Co-operation Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement"), dated 23 December 1967, and effective 1 April 1968; Considering further that the CONTRACTING PARTIES, by the Decision of 20 February 1970 , agreed that the participating States may continue, subject to the conditions and procedures set forth in paragraph 1 of that Decision, to implement the Agreement as amended by a Protocol amending the Agreement and constituting an integral part thereof (hereinafter referred to as the "Protoccl"), dated 16 July 1969; Considering further that the aforesaid Decision of 20 February 1970 was intended to expire no later than 31 March 1973; Noting that the participating States have notified the CONTRACTING PARTIES of their agreement to extend the Agreement, as amended by the Protocol, until 31 March 1978 and have requested that the Decision of 20 February 1970 be extended to 31 March 1978; Desirous of according contracting parties an opportunity to consult with the participating States in accordance with paragraph 1(b) of the Decision and to carry out the review of the Decision in accordance with paragraph 1(c); The CONTRACTING PARTIES decide to extend the validity of the Decision of 20 February 1970 subject to the relevant terms and conditions specified therein, until the end of the twenty-ninth session of the CONTRACTING PARTIES.
    [Show full text]
  • TRO LAT Inoamc F-'MCANO DE DEM06RAFIA
    ^Nl o f f , 'S % LATIN A^SSICA United Nations Development Programe (Special Fund) LATIN AMERlCyUI DEMOGRAPHIC CBNI’HE Semi-Azumal Report £or the Period 1 October 1972 - 31 March 1973 1 :8LiOTECA "GIORGIO MORTARA" f .TRO LATiNOAMc F-'MCANO DE DEM06RAFIA <0 REGULAS TEAINIIÍG PRCKJHAMMS The fiJPteenth Basic Cource of CBLADE, the first given at the Subcentre in San J osé (COSTA RICA), céanc to its conclusion by the middle of December» The final monographs, carried out under the guidance of the teachiz^ staff, covered the following general subjects» sources of demographic data (4 ), mortality (4 ), migration (3), demographic aspects of the labour force (5 ) and population projections (1 )» The sixteenth Basic Course started on 19 Febzniary of this year, attended by 20 fellows, selected from 16 countries of the region. As in previous years, an important proportion of students has an academic background in Statistics, Mathematics and Econcmics (12). 15 students of the 20 participants have bean granted United Nations fellowships, the remaining being financed byt the Ford Foundation (4 ) and A.I.D, (l). The fourteenth Advanced Course, the last given at Santiago Headquarters concluded by the end of December. During the first part of the period under report, October-Deceraber 1972, the students carried out a second monograph lander the supervision of the teaching staff. These reports covered the following general topics» family (2), nuptiality (2), female en^loyiaent (1 ), fertility (2), fertility and mortality (I), mortality (2). The Advanced Course will not be given during 1973. It is planned to start this p v o g rsm n eagain at San José in 1974.
    [Show full text]
  • Name Files 807 Abshire, David M
    Name Files 807 Abshire, David M. [June 28, 1973] Acheson, Dean [1969-1971] Acheson meeting with President March 19, 1969 [Empty] Agnew, Harold M. Dr. [May-July 1971] Box Folder Date Extent Aiken - Cooper Mtg. (Senators) [1970-1971] Alexander, Lamar [1969-1970] Allen, R.V. [1969-1971] Allin, Mort [May 7, 1970] Alsop, Joseph [1969-1973] Anderson, Jack [1971-1972] Anderson, Martin [September 9, 1969] Anderson, Robert [1969-1973] Armstrong, Willis [December 1969-July 1970] Aubrac, Raymond [1971-1972] 808 Baker, Richard T. [April 1971] Barnett, Richard [December 1969] Bauer, Etienne [August 1971] Behr, Robert M. Col. [May 1971-April 1972] Archbishop Benelli [January 1970] Bergford, James [February 1970] Berry, Sidney B. Brig Gen. [October 1970] Box Folder Date Extent Name Files 808 Black, Eugene [April 1969-March 1970] Black, Shirley Temple [February 1970-June 1974] Blocker, Joel [October-December 1969] Bohlen, Charles E. [June 1969-August 1971] Borman, Frank [January-October 1969] Bowles, Chester [March-April 1970] Brandon, Henry [September 1969-July 1971] Brooke, Edward W. [July 1971-April 1973] Brown, Harold [May 1970-May 1971] Brown, John R. III [February 1969-February 1971] 809 Brownell, Herbert [August 1969-August 1972] Bruce, David [April 1969-July 1971] Buchanan, Patrick J. [March 1969-August 1973] Buckley, William [May 1970-August 1972] Bull, Steve [December 1971-April 1973] Bundy, McGeorge (The Ford Foundation) [September 1969-October 1971] Bunker, Ellsworth [June 1973] Box Folder Date Extent Name Files 809 (Gen.) Burchinal [December 1969-June 1971] Burchett, Wilfred [June 1969-November 1971] 810 Burke, Arleigh (Adm. Ret) [1973] Burns, Arthur F. [1969-1973] Bushnell, John [October 1973] Butterfield, Alexander P.
    [Show full text]
  • White House Central Files, Staff Member and Office Files: Susan
    CONTAINER NO. CONTENTS CORRESPONDENCE FILE, 1970-74 1 Thank-You Letters [2/70-7/70] Thank-Yous--1970 C[oralJS[chmidJ--Thank You's--1971 C[oralJS[chmid] Thank Yous 1972 October 1970-February 1972 Stephanie Wilson [1 of 3J October 1970-February 1972 Stephanie wilson [2 of 3] October 1970-February 1972 Stephanie Wilson [3 of 3] ~tephan ie Carbons [February 1972-August 1972] [1 of 2] Stephan ie Carbons [February 1972-August 1972] [2 of 2] 2 October 1970-July 1972 TN, JNE, DOE [1 of 3] October 1970-July 1972 TN, JNE, DOE [2 of 3] October 1970-July 1972 TN, JNE, DOE [3 of 3] Carbons Alphabetically (9/1/72-Election) [1 of 6] Carbons Alphabetically (9/1/72-E1ection) [2 of 6] [A-C) Carbons Alphabetically (9/1/72-Election) [3 of 6] [D-H) Carbons Alphabetically (9/1/72-E1ection) [4 of 6] [ I-M] Carbons Alphabetically (9/1/72-E1ection) [5 of 6] [N-R] Carbons Alphabetically (9/1/72-Election) [6 of 6] [S-Z) Carbons Alphabetically (Election-Inauguration) [1 of 4] Carbons Alphabetically (Election-Inauguration) [2 of 4] [A- C) Carbons Alphabetically (Election-Inauguration) [3 of 4] [O- M] Carbons Alphabetically (Election-Inauguration) [4 of 4] [N- Z] 3 Carbons Alphabetically (Inaug .-6/1/73) A-M [1 of 5] [A-B) Carbons Alphabetically (Inaug. -6/1/73) A-C-t [2 of 5] [C-D] Carbons Alphabetically (Inaug .-6/1/73) A-M [3 of 5] [E-G] Carbons Alphabetically (Inaug. -6/1/73) A-I-t [4 of 5] [H-K] Carbons Alphabetically (Inaug .-6/1/73) A-M [5 of 5] [L-!wJ] Carbons Alphabetically (Inaug.-6/l/73) N-Z [1 of 3] [N-Q] Carbons Alphabetically (Inaug.-6/1/73) N-Z [2 of 3] [R-S] Carbons Alphabetically (Inaug .-6/1/73) l-l-Z [3 of 3] IT-Z 1 Memos, Anne Armstrong (& [Pam] Powell) Memos, Jim Cavanaugh Memos, Clem Conger Memos, r-1ike Farrell/Bob Genader 4 Memos, Barbara Flynn (& [Eliska] Hasek) Memos, Gift Unit ~emos, William Henkel Memos, Miscellaneous Memos, National Security Council Memos, David Parker (& [Terrence] O'Donnell) ~emos, Coral Schmid Memos, \'lilliam Timmons C[oral]S[chmid]--Reading File 1970 Travel Vouchers C[oral]S[chmid] 8 CONTAINER NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal of the European Communities Having Regard to the Council Directive (') of 4 March 1969 on the Harmonization Of
    No L 286/ 14 Official Journal of the European Communities 23 . 10 . 74 COMMISSION DIRECTIVE of 30 September 1974 amending Commission Directive of 26 March 1973 applying Articles 13 and 14 of the Council Directive of 4 March 1969 on the harmonization of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in respect of inward processing ( 74/508/EEC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN Directive amending Article 13 of the Directive of 4 COMMUNITIES, March 1969 were approved, would be rendered nuga­ tory as regards products from those industrial sectors consigned by the authorized processor in the circum­ Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European stances mentioned in the previous recital ; Economic Community ; Whereas the state of discussion on the proposed Direc­ tive for the amendment of Article 13 is such that Having regard to the Council Directive (') of 4 March amendment cannot be expected in the near future ; 1969 on the harmonization of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in respect of Whereas the time limit of six months imposed on the inward processing, as last amended by the Act ( 2 ) Member States for the bringing into force of the annexed to the Treaty ( 3 ) on the accession of new measures required by implementing Directive of 26 Member States to the European Economic Commu­ March 1973 has already been extended to twelve nity and to the European Atomic Energy Community, months by Commission Directive ( 5 ) of 5 October signed at Brussels on 22 January 1972, and in parti­ 1 973
    [Show full text]
  • This Special Labor Force Report of March 1973, Shows
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 099 545 CE 002 631 AUTHOR Hayghe, Howard TITLE Marital and Family Characteristics of the LaborForce in March 1973. Special Labor Force Report No.164. INSTITUTION Bureau of Labor Statistics (DOL), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 74 NOTE 43p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.75 HC-$1.85 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS Employment Patterns; *Employment Statistics; *Employment Trends; Heads of Households; *Labor Force; *Marital Status; Tables (Data); *Working Women ABSTRACT This Special Labor Force Report of March 1973, shows a continued decline in labor force participation rates of married men and an increase in rates of married women withyoung children. It also explores the trends of husbands' and wives' labor force participation, as well as labor force activity of othergroups, such as women heads of families and single persons. Data by race as well as by family income are presented. Most of this information is based on the annual nationwide survey of the marital and family characteristics of workers. (Appended to the reportare an explanatory note, and numerous statistical tables and charts.) (Author/HP) OF HEALTH. U S DEPARTMENT EDUCA'JN &WELFARE INSTITUTE OF Marital and NATION..I EDUCATION Pwo Family Characteristics 0MI NItin'.titI N 1,10, AN WI IVI 0 1140M MI( I I A( 1 /A IION OHIC,IN OWI,AN, PINION', of the Labor Force Ulf WI WION I., 01\,1I OH AlINC, POIN ,NAWit WI OWE AIt p Ot)Nol NI t I I Olt01 in March 1973 t A, NAItONAt NI NI Of iON ()I40l)l IC`1, I DU( A l IONl'0`,1, Special Labor Force Report 164 U.S, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Bureau of Labor Statistics 1974 SCOPE OF INTEREST NOTICE The ERIC Facility hasassigned this document for processing to: so In our judgement, this document is also of interest to the clearing- houses noted to the right.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (147Kb)
    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COM(74) 1008 final --::::- Brussels, 27 June 1974 ffipfOSA,L £:,9! .fl.~lJ!ZJL.~cy'JY! modifying the Commission Directive 73/95/EEC of 26 March 1973 applying Articles 13 and 14 of the Council Directive of 4 March 1969, on the harmonisation of provisions laid down by law, regu.1 ation or administrative action in respect of inward processit~ (submitted to the Council by the Coim!lission) COM(74) 1008 final 't Proposal for a Council Directive modifying the Commission Directive 73/95/E$0 of 26 March 1973 applying Articles 13 and 11 of the Council Directive of 4 March 1969, on the harmonisation of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in respect of inward processing. Having regard to the Tree.ty establishing the European Economic Community; Having regard to the Council Directive (1) of 4 March 1969, on the harmonisation of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrat~ve action in respect of inward processincr, ns last amende.d by th;e Act ( 2) annexed to -the Treaty on the Accession of new Member States to the European Economic Community and the European. Atomic Energy Community (3) signed at Brussels on 22 January 1972, and in particular Article 28 thereof; whereas the Directive, (4) applying Articles 13 and 14 of tho foresaid Council ·Directive,. adopted on 26 March 1973, make.s provision in Article 7 for entry into force not later than six months after its notification; Whereas the·notification ~ook place on 6 April 1973; Whereas for some time past the Council hss
    [Show full text]
  • Bangkok, 16 March 1973 .ENTRY INTO FORCE: 1 December 1974, In
    11. AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE ASIAN RICE TRADE FUND Bangkok, 16 March 1973 ENTRY. INTO FORCE: 1 December 1974, in accordance with article 19. REGISTRATION: 1 December 1974, No. 13679. STATUS: Signatories: 5. Parties: 5. TEXT: United Nations, Treaty Series , vol. 955, p. 195; depositary notifications C.N.26.1979.TREATIES-1 of 28 February 1979 and C.N.101.1979.TREATIES-2 of 22 May 1979 [amendments to paragraphs (i) and (iii) of article 1]. Note: The text of the Agreement was drawn up by the intergovernmental meeting on the establishment of an Asian Rice Trade Fund convened by the United Nations Economic Commission for Asia and the Far East at Bangkok, Thailand, from 12 to 16 March 1973; it was approved and initialled by the representatives of Democratic Kampuchea, the Philippines, Sri Lanka and Thailand. The signatories agreed on 29 November 1973 to extend to 31 May and 1 December 1974, respectively, the time-limits provided for by articles 17 and 19 of the Agreement for signature and deposit of instruments of acceptance. The Board of Directors of the Asian Rice Trade Fund, in a resolution adopted at Manila on 10 January 1979, proposed certain amendments to article 1 (i) and (iii) of the Agreement. In accordance with the provisions of article 13 of the Agreement the proposed amendments have come into force on 15 December 1981 upon acceptance by all members of the Fund. Following is a list of the States which have accepted the amendments and the dates of their acceptance: . Participant Date of Acceptance Bangladesh...................................................14
    [Show full text]