Helderberg District Plan
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
FINAL DRAFT HELDERBERG DISTRICT PLAN 2012 SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK TECHNICAL REPORT Approved as a Structure Plan in terms of section 4(10) of the Land Use Planning Ordinance, Ordinance 15 of 1985 31 October 2012 REFERENCE GUIDE TO CONTENTS OF THE DISTRICT PLAN: Section Purpose and focus 1. INTRODUCTION • Outline of background and legislative status of SDP and EMF 2. DEVELOPMENT AND POLICY • Planning directives and policy that inform the SDP. CONTEXT 3. KEY STRATEGIES: THE CONTEXT • Key spatial strategies of the CTSDF and how they are applied to the district. AND CENTRAL SPATIAL IDEAS • Contextualises strategies in terms of the “district now” and “what action is needed” to address issues. • Identifies what spatial concepts should be applied to achieve strategy and address issues. • Highlights the central spatial ideas, specific to the district, that are key to reinforcing a positive long term metropolitan and district spatial structure 3.1. Plan for employment and • Identifies the key challenges in respect of economic activity and employment in the improve access to economic district, giving consideration to the form and functioning of economic activity, the opportunities relationship between transport systems and land use • Spatial concepts and structuring elements include: multi-directional accessibility grid, areas for intensification. 3.2. Manage urban growth and • Identifies the key challenges in terms of the natural environment and managing create a balance between urban urban growth within the district. development and • Spatial concepts and structuring elements include: natural assets, development environmental protection edges, future urban growth areas. 3.3. Build inclusive, integrated and • Identifies opportunities for integration and improving public environments including vibrant city opportunities for civic precincts, destination places. • Spatial concepts and structuring elements include: civic precincts, destination places, structuring open space and critical public links, integrated settlement patterns. 4. SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN: • Application of the spatial concepts and structuring elements identified in section 3, to DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT the district. GUIDELINES • Forms the “broad level” guide to the desired future spatial form of the district and is supplemented by more detailed “sub-district land use guidelines” in section 6.2. Guidelines are grouped into 5 sections. 4.1. Spatial planning categories • This includes development guidelines at a broad district scale for the major land areas in the district (e.g. natural, agricultural and urban areas). The categories are aligned to those adopted by the PSDF and CTSDF. 4.2. Transport infrastructure and route • Provides direction to the desired positive functioning of land use / transport network designation to support the public transport network and the accessibility of social and economic opportunities in the district. 4.3. Conceptual designations • Provides broad guidance in relation to spatial concepts that are not precisely spatially defined at the district scale. (e.g. urban nodes, civic precincts, destination places). Land use and form implications may be detailed through local area plans. 4.4. Development edges • Provides direction to urban growth in relation to the definition of development edges in the district. 4.5. Precautionary areas and utility • Provides development guidance in relation to areas which may present a risk or service infrastructure installations limits land use or activities in the district (e.g. flood prone areas, buffers associated and networks with noxious uses). 5. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT • Provides support mechanism (inclusive of spatial development plan: district FRAMEWORK (EMF) development guidelines) in review of development applications. 5.1. Environmental Impact • Provides a summary of status, environmental management priorities for Management Zones (EIMZs) environmental attributes. • Based on environmental attributes, describes EIMZs, which provide an indication of possible impacts of activities on environmental attributes. 6. IMPLEMENTATION • Provides guidance in terms of actions required to implement the proposals contained in the spatial development plan. 6.1. Urban restructuring and • Provides an informant to aligning spatial planning (including new development areas upgrading: framework for capital and areas for land use intensification) with service and infrastructure planning. investment • Identifies sector specific proposals (capital investment framework) in support of the spatial development plan (including for example new transport links, areas for public i Helderberg District Plan – Technical Report 2012 space investment, publicly assisted housing, new district scale open space proposals). 6.2. Sub-district development • Supplements the spatial development plan: district development guidelines with more guidelines detailed “sub-district development guidelines” that provide further direction in terms of achieving desired spatial form at a local level. • Reference is made to where more detailed local area plans exist and will continue to provide guidance to decision making. 6.3. Local area planning priorities • Identifies key local area planning priorities for the district where further work is required along with lead actions and role players. REFERENCE GUIDE TO ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (EMF)*: Content elements Guide to location of content in the district plan • Identification of the area to which EMF applies • Baseline information and analysis report: Section 2.1: Section 2.1 • An indication of the conservation status of the area • A description of how information was captured; • Baseline information and analysis report: Section 1 • Identification of information gaps • Baseline information and analysis report: Section 1 • Specification of the environmental attributes in the area as • Baseline information and analysis report: Section 2.1 – 2.3 well as parts of the area to which attributes relate • Summarised in Vol 2: Section 5.2 • Interrelationship and significance of the attributes; • Development pressures and trends; opportunities and • Baseline information and analysis report: Section 2.4. (see also section constraints 3) • Description of the environmental (management) priorities in • Baseline information and analysis report: Section 2.4 the area • Summarised in Vol 2: Section 5.2 • Information on activities that would have a significant impact • Technical report: Section 5.2 read with Section 4. on those attributes and those that would not • Information on activities that would be undesirable in the area or specific parts of the area • Management proposals and guidelines • Technical report: Section 5.2 (see also section 4 and section 6.2) • The desired state of the environment • Technical report: Section 4 (see also section 3) • Revision schedule for the environmental management • Technical report: Section 1.6 framework • A description of the public participation process including • Technical report: Section 1.5 issues raised by I&APs • Baseline information and analysis report (annexure) *The EMF is an integrated though distinguishable component of the district plan. For ease of reference, the table indicates how the EMF is structured across the district plan product. ii Helderberg District Plan – Technical Report 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................................... 10 1.2 Towards a rationalised policy-drive land use management system ................................ 11 1.3 Legal status of the district plan and the consistency principle ........................................ 12 1.4 Alignment with Cape Town Zoning Scheme .................................................................. 15 1.5 Overview of the District Plan drafting process ................................................................ 15 1.6 Review of the District Plan ............................................................................................. 16 1.7 Study area ..................................................................................................................... 16 2. DEVELOPMENT AND POLICY CONTEXT .............................................................................. 18 2.1 Legislative context ......................................................................................................... 18 2.2 Strategy and policy planning informants ........................................................................ 18 2.3 Local Area Plan Informants ........................................................................................... 20 3. KEY STRATEGIES: THE CONTEXT AND CENTRAL SPATIAL IDEAS ................................. 22 3.1 Strategy 1: Plan for employment and improve access to economic opportunities ......... 22 3.2 Strategy 2: Manage urban growth and create a balance between urban development and environmental protection .................................................................................................... 31 3.2 Strategy 3: Build an inclusive, integrated and vibrant City ............................................. 36 .................................................................................................................................................. 40 4. SPATIAL