DOCSLIB.ORG

Building a Business Case for Compressed Natural Gas in Fleet Applications George Mitchell National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Building a Business Case for Compressed Natural Gas in Fleet Applications George Mitchell National Renewable Energy Laboratory Building a Business Case for Compressed Natural Gas in Fleet Applications George Mitchell National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Technical Report NREL/TP-5400-63707 March 2015 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Building a Business Case for Compressed Natural Gas in Fleet Applications George Mitchell National Renewable Energy Laboratory Prepared under Task No. VTP2.0200 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Technical Report NREL/TP-5400-63707 March 2015 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/scitech Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 phone: 865.576.8401 fax: 865.576.5728 email: mailto:[email protected] Available for sale to the public, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 phone: 800.553.6847 fax: 703.605.6900 email: [email protected] online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/help/ordermethods.aspx Cover Photos by Dennis Schroeder: (left to right) NREL 26173, NREL 18302, NREL 19758, NREL 29642, NREL 19795. NREL prints on paper that contains recycled content Author George Mitchell, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Acknowledgments This report was produced with funding from the Clean Cities activity in the U.S. Department of Energy Vehicle Technology Program. The author is grateful for the contributions of the following individuals involved in developing the Vehicle Infrastructure and Cash-flow Evaluation (VICE) model that is the basis of this report: Rob Adams, Marathon Technical Services Andy Burnham, Argonne National Laboratory Caley Johnson, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Margo Melendez, National Renewable Energy Laboratory All assumptions and inaccuracies are the responsibility of the author alone. iii This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 General Overview ................................................................................................................................. 2 2.1 Baseline Parameters ...................................................................................................................... 2 2.1.1 Project Type ..................................................................................................................... 2 2.1.2 Investment Type ............................................................................................................... 2 2.1.3 Tax Exemption Status for Fuel ......................................................................................... 3 2.1.4 Vehicle Data ..................................................................................................................... 3 2.1.5 Infrastructure, Fuels, Operations, and Incentives ............................................................. 4 3 Compressed Natural Gas Project Development ................................................................................ 9 3.1 Upfront Project Decisions ............................................................................................................. 9 3.1.1 Understanding the Financial Soundness of a Compressed Natural Gas Project ............ 10 3.2 Results From the Base Case ........................................................................................................ 11 3.3 Simple Payback ........................................................................................................................... 12 3.4 Rate of Return ............................................................................................................................. 12 3.5 Project Net Present Value ........................................................................................................... 13 3.6 Fuel Consumption and Cost ........................................................................................................ 15 3.7 Fleet Composition ....................................................................................................................... 16 3.8 Additional Considerations Affecting Project Profitability .......................................................... 17 3.8.1 Station Cost .................................................................................................................... 17 3.8.2 Incremental Vehicle Cost ............................................................................................... 19 3.8.3 Vehicle Maintenance Costs ............................................................................................ 21 3.8.4 Compressed Natural Gas Station Electricity and Maintenance Costs ............................ 22 3.8.5 Subsidies and Tax Credits .............................................................................................. 23 4 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................ 24 4.1 Most Influential Parameters ........................................................................................................ 24 Glossary ..................................................................................................................................................... 29 iv This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. List of Figures Figure 1. CNG station costs .......................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 2. Investment strategy visualization—fuel use and availability ........................................................ 9 Figure 3. Investment timing effect .............................................................................................................. 10 Figure 4. Example of cumulative cash flow, by year .................................................................................. 11 Figure 5. Relationship between fleet size and simple payback period ........................................................ 12 Figure 6. Effect of fleet size on the project ROR ........................................................................................ 13 Figure 7. Fleet size effect on project NPV, discount rate = 6% .................................................................. 14 Figure 8. Fleet size and VMT sensitivity .................................................................................................... 15 Figure 9. Fuel price differential effect on simple payback ......................................................................... 16 Figure 10. Effects of CNG station cost on simple payback (diesel) ........................................................... 18 Figure 11. Effects of CNG station cost on simple payback (gasoline) ....................................................... 19 Figure 12. Effects of vehicle incremental cost on simple payback (diesel) ................................................ 20 Figure 13. Effects of vehicle incremental cost on simple payback (gasoline) ............................................ 20 Figure 14. Vehicle M&O cost effects on simple payback .......................................................................... 21 Figure 15. CNG station M&O cost effects on simple payback ................................................................... 22 Figure 16. CNG station electricity cost effects on simple payback ............................................................ 23 List of Tables Table 1. Project Investment, NPV, and Break-Even Point ......................................................................... 14 Table 2. 100 Vehicle Mixed Fleet Comparison .......................................................................................... 17 Table 3. Effect of Tax Credits on Simple Payback ....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U.S. Energy in the 21St Century: a Primer
    U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46723 SUMMARY R46723 U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Since the start of the 21st century, the U.S. energy system has changed tremendously. Technological advances in energy production have driven changes in energy consumption, and Melissa N. Diaz, the United States has moved from being a net importer of most forms of energy to a declining Coordinator importer—and a net exporter in 2019. The United States remains the second largest producer and Analyst in Energy Policy consumer of energy in the world, behind China. Overall energy consumption in the United States has held relatively steady since 2000, while the mix of energy sources has changed. Between 2000 and 2019, consumption of natural gas and renewable energy increased, while oil and nuclear power were relatively flat and coal decreased. In the same period, production of oil, natural gas, and renewables increased, while nuclear power was relatively flat and coal decreased. Overall energy production increased by 42% over the same period. Increases in the production of oil and natural gas are due in part to technological improvements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling that have facilitated access to resources in unconventional formations (e.g., shale). U.S. oil production (including natural gas liquids and crude oil) and natural gas production hit record highs in 2019. The United States is the largest producer of natural gas, a net exporter, and the largest consumer. Oil, natural gas, and other liquid fuels depend on a network of over three million miles of pipeline infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • ID 233 Optimization of Network Design for Charging Station
    Proceedings of the 5th NA International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Detroit, Michigan, USA, August 10 - 14, 2020 Optimization of Network Design for Charging Station Placement : A Case Study Silvi Istiqomah, Wahyudi Sutopo Master Program of Industrial Engineering Department Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Indonesia [email protected], [email protected] Abstract The use of electric vehicles (EV) is quite a lot. With so many EVs scattered, it is necessary to plan the placement of a filling station that takes into account all the components of tractive effort, regenerative braking, and parasitic power users. Actual driving distance and altitude data from Google Maps are used as data for placement of filling stations and can therefore far more accurately predict the range that can be achieved from a given EV than a typical Euclidean distance model. In addition, the optimization model for filling station placement considers the number of affordable households in the filling station procurement plan. One problem in this study is the importance of meeting the increasing demand for EV fuels. Considerations for adjusting existing EV levels. The proposed optimization technique is applied to the transportation network, and in the case study in the Solo area, where the focus is to reach the maximum range with the minimum number of filling station distances. The results are promising and show that flexibility, smart route selection, and numerical efficiency of the proposed design techniques, can choose strategic locations to fill stations from thousands of possible locations without numerical difficulties. Keywords Optimization, Charging station, Placement 1. Introduction With the development of EV, the planning of electric vehicle charging stations (EV) has become an important concern of distribution network planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Sale of Adulterated Or Export Bound Motor Fuels in the Local Market
    SALE OF ADULTERATED OR EXPORT BOUND MOTOR FUELS IN THE LOCAL MARKET The Energy Regulatory Commission is mandated under Section 95 of the Energy Act No. 12 of 2006 to monitor petroleum products offered for sale in the local market with the aim of preventing motor fuel adulteration or dumping of export bound fuels. In this regard, the Commission undertakes a program of continuous monitoring of the quality of petroleum motor fuels on sale, transport and storage throughout the country. During the period July 2018 - September 2018, 4,456 tests were conducted at 675 petroleum sites (including illegal petroleum sites). From the tests, 637 sites were compliant which represents a 94.4% compliance level. However, tests from 38 sites turned out to be non-compliant. Pursuant to Regulation 15 of the Energy (Retail Facility Construction and Licensing) Regulations 2013, the non-compliant stations and their particular offences are listed hereunder: Test Date Name of Station County Physical Location Nature of non-compliance Status as at 1st July to 27th September 2018 Station reopened after upgrading the product and paying 1 10.07.2018 Texas Energy Service Station – Awendo Migori Awendo Offering for sale Diesel contaminated with Kerosene. penalties amounting to KShs 500,000 2 12.07.2018 Mwito Filling Station Meru Kangeta Offering for sale Diesel contaminated with Kerosene. Station closed. Station reopened after upgrading the product and paying 3 17.07.2018 Petroplus Magharibi Malaba Filling Station Busia Malaba Offering for sale Super Petrol contaminated with Kerosene. penalties amounting to KShs 130,000 4 19.07.2018 Kyang’ombe Illegal Fuel Site I Nairobi Kyang’ombe Diesel contaminated with Kerosene found at the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Gas and Propane
    Construction Concerns: Natural Gas and Propane Article by Gregory Havel September 28, 2015 For the purposes of this article, I will discuss the use of natural gas and propane [liquefied propane (LP)] gas in buildings under construction, in buildings undergoing renovation, and in the temporary structures that are found on construction job sites including scaffold enclosures. In permanent structures, natural gas is carried by pipe from the utility company meter to the location of the heating appliances. Natural gas from utility companies is lighter than air and is odorized. In temporary structures and in buildings under construction or renovation, the gas may be carried from the utility company meter by pipe or a hose rated for natural gas at the pressure to be used to the location of the heating appliances. These pipes and hoses must be properly supported and must be protected from damage including from foot and wheeled traffic. The hoses, pipes, and connections must be checked regularly for leaks. For permanent and temporary structures, LP gas is usually stored in horizontal tanks outside the structure (photo 1) at a distance from the structure. September 28, 2015 (1) In Photo 1, note the frost on the bottom third of the tank that indicates the approximate amount of LP that is left in the tank. LP gas for fuel is heavier than air and is odorized. It is carried from the tank to the heating appliances by pipe or hose rated for LP gas at the pressure to be used. As it is for natural gas, these pipes and hoses must be properly supported and protected from damage including from foot and wheeled traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • FACT SHEET 7: Liquid Hydrogen As a Potential Low- Carbon Fuel for Aviation
    FACT SHEET 7: Liquid hydrogen as a potential low- carbon fuel for aviation This fact sheet aims to explain how current aviation fuels operate before providing descriptions of how alternative fuel options, like sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) and liquid hydrogen, could help meet the rigorous climate targets set by the aviation industry. Secondly, this document explores the limitations and opportunities of liquid hydrogen when it comes to the manufacturing, safety, current uses and outlooks. This document concludes with a discussion on policy, mandates and incentives on the topic of hydrogen as a potential fuel for aviation. Introduction – Why hydrogen? Aircraft fly thanks to a combination of air and a combustion process that occurs in the aircraft engines. The primary source of energy is the fuel. Each kilogram of fuel, which would occupy less than 1 litre of volume, contains a significant amount of energy, 42.8 MJ [1]. If we could convert the energy of a 1L bottle of fuel into electric energy to power a cell phone, the battery would last for over 2 months. This energy is extracted in the combustion chamber of the engine in the form of heat; Compressed air enters the combustion chamber and gets heated up to temperatures nearing 1,500°C. This hot high- pressure air is what ultimately moves the aircraft forward. Kerosene is composed of carbon and hydrogen (hence it’s a hydrocarbon fuel). When the fuel is completely burned, these carbon and hydrogen molecules recombine with oxygen to create water vapor (H2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) (Fig.1). August 2019 Emissions: From Combustion: H2O + CO2 Other: NOx, nvPM SOx, soot Fuel in (C + H) Figure 1 Schematic of a turbofan engine adapted from: [2] Carbon dioxide will always be created as a by-product of burning a carbon-based fuel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Liquid Biofuels for APEC Economies
    NREL/TP-6A2-43709. Posted with permission. The Future of Liquid Biofuels for APEC Economies Energy Working Group May 2008 Report prepared for the APEC Energy Working Group under EWG 01/2006A by: Anelia Milbrandt National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Golden, Colorado, USA Web site: www.nrel.gov Dr. Ralph P. Overend NREL Research Fellow (Retired) Ottawa, Ontario, Canada APEC#208-RE-01.8 Acknowledgments The authors would like to acknowledge and thank the project overseer Mr. Rangsan Sarochawikasit (Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Thailand) for his leadership of this project. We also would like to thank Dr. Helena Chum (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, USA) for contributing materials, and providing review and feedback; and the chair of APEC Biofuels Task Force, Mr. Jeffrey Skeer, (Department of Energy, USA) for his support and guidance. The authors also greatly appreciate the time and valuable contributions of the following individuals: Ms. Naomi Ashurst and Ms. Marie Taylor, Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources, Australia Ms. Siti Hafsah, Office of the Minister of Energy, Brunei Darussalam Mr. Mark Stumborg, Agriculture and Agri-Food, Canada Ms. Corissa Petro, National Energy Commission, Chile Mr. Song Yanqin and Mr. Zhao Yongqiang, National Development and Reform Commission, China Mr. K.C. Lo, Electrical and Mechanical Service Department, Hong Kong, China Dr. Hom-Ti Lee, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Chinese Taipei Mr. Hendi Kariawan, Indonesia Biofuels Team, Indonesia Dr. Jeong-Hwan Bae, Korea Energy Economics Institute, Republic of Korea Mr. Diego Arjona-Arguelles, Secretariat for Energy (SENER), Mexico Mr. Angel Irazola and Mr. Diego de la Puente Consigliere, Agricola Del Chira S.A., Peru Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Nebraska Liquid Fuel Carriers Information Guide
    Information Guide March 2021 Nebraska Liquid Fuel Carriers Overview Any person transporting motor fuels or aircraft fuels in a transport vehicle into, within, or out of Nebraska must obtain a liquid fuel carriers license. A copy of the license must be carried in the transport vehicle whenever motor fuels or aircraft fuels are carried in this state. In addition, a copy of the bill of lading, manifest, bill of sale, purchase order, sales invoice, delivery ticket, or similar documentation must be carried in the transport vehicle at all times when transporting motor fuels or aircraft fuels in Nebraska. This documentation must include the following information: v Date; v Type of fuel; v Amount of fuel; v Where and from whom the fuel was obtained; v Destination state or delivery location; v Name and address of the owner of the fuel; and v Name and address of the consignee or purchaser. A license is not required for persons transporting motor fuels or aircraft fuels within Nebraska for their own agricultural, quarrying, industrial, or other nonhighway use; nor is it required for the transportation of leaded racing fuels, propane, or compressed natural gas, regardless of its ownership or use. This guidance document is advisory in nature but is binding on the Nebraska Department of Revenue (DOR) until amended. A guidance document does not include internal procedural documents that only affect the internal operations of DOR and does not impose additional requirements or penalties on regulated parties or include confidential information or rules and regulations made in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying the Potential of Renewable Natural Gas to Support a Reformed Energy Landscape: Estimates for New York State
    energies Review Quantifying the Potential of Renewable Natural Gas to Support a Reformed Energy Landscape: Estimates for New York State Stephanie Taboada 1,2, Lori Clark 2,3, Jake Lindberg 1,2, David J. Tonjes 2,3,4 and Devinder Mahajan 1,2,* 1 Department of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA; [email protected] (S.T.); [email protected] (J.L.) 2 Institute of Gas Innovation and Technology, Advanced Energy Research and Technology, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA; [email protected] (L.C.); [email protected] (D.J.T.) 3 Department of Technology and Society, Stony Brook University, 100 Nicolls Rd, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA 4 Waste Data and Analysis Center, Stony Brook University, 100 Nicolls Rd, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Public attention to climate change challenges our locked-in fossil fuel-dependent energy sector. Natural gas is replacing other fossil fuels in our energy mix. One way to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) impact of fossil natural gas is to replace it with renewable natural gas (RNG). The benefits of utilizing RNG are that it has no climate change impact when combusted and utilized in the same applications as fossil natural gas. RNG can be injected into the gas grid, used as a transportation fuel, or used for heating and electricity generation. Less common applications include utilizing RNG to produce chemicals, such as methanol, dimethyl ether, and ammonia. The GHG impact should be quantified before committing to RNG. This study quantifies the potential production of biogas (i.e., Citation: Taboada, S.; Clark, L.; the precursor to RNG) and RNG from agricultural and waste sources in New York State (NYS).
    [Show full text]
  • Producing Fuel and Electricity from Coal with Low Carbon Dioxide Emissions
    Producing Fuel and Electricity from Coal with Low Carbon Dioxide Emissions K. Blok, C.A. Hendriks, W.C. Turkenburg Depanrnent of Science,Technology and Society University of Utrecht Oudegracht320, NL-351 1 PL Utrecht, The Netherlands R.H. Williams Center for Energy and Environmental Studies Princeton University Princeton, New Jersey08544, USA June 1991 Abstract. New energy technologies are needed to limit CO2 emissions and the detrimental effects of global warming. In this article we describe a process which produces a low-carbon gaseousfuel from coal. Synthesis gas from a coal gasifier is shifted to a gas mixture consisting mainly of H2 and CO2. The CO2 is isolated by a physical absorption process, compressed,and transported by pipeline to a depleted natural gas field where it is injected. What remains is a gaseousfuel consisting mainly of hydrogen. We describe two applications of this fuel. The first involves a combined cycle power plant integrated with the coal gasifier, the shift reactor and the CO2 recovery units. CO2 recovery and storage will increase the electricity production cost by one third. The secondprovides hydrogen or a hydrogen-rich fuel gas for distributed applications, including transportation; it is shown that the fuel can be produced at a cost comparable to projected costs for gasoline. A preliminary analysis reveals that all components of the process described here are in such a phase of development that the proposed technology is ready for demonstration. ~'> --. ~'"' .,.,""~ 0\ ~ 0\0 ;.., ::::. ~ ~ -.., 01) §~ .5~ c0 ~.., ~'> '" .~ ~ ..::. ~ ~ "'~'" '" 0\00--. ~~ ""00 Q....~~ '- ~~ --. ~.., ~ ~ ""~ 0000 .00 t¥") $ ~ .9 ~~~ .- ..~ c ~ ~ ~ .~ O"Oe) """1;3 .0 .-> ...~ 0 ~ ,9 u u "0 ...~ --.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Gas Energy Efficiency: Progress and Opportunities
    Natural Gas Energy Efficiency: Progress and Opportunities Steven Nadel July 2017 Report U1708 © American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy 529 14th Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20045 Phone: (202) 507-4000 • Twitter: @ACEEEDC Facebook.com/myACEEE • aceee.org NATURAL GAS ENERGY EFFICIENCY © ACEEE Contents About the Author ...............................................................................................................................iii Acknowledgments ..............................................................................................................................iii Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... iv Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 The Natural Gas Industry................................................................................................................... 1 Natural Gas Efficiency Trends ........................................................................................................... 2 Contributors to Natural Gas Efficiency Progress ............................................................................ 2 New Technologies .................................................................................................................... 3 Price Effects ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Liquid Injection Propane System for Spark-Ignited Engines Via Fuel Temperature Control" (2007)
    Scholars' Mine Masters Theses Student Theses and Dissertations Summer 2007 Development of a liquid injection propane system for spark- ignited engines via fuel temperature control Brian Charles Applegate Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses Part of the Mechanical Engineering Commons Department: Recommended Citation Applegate, Brian Charles, "Development of a liquid injection propane system for spark-ignited engines via fuel temperature control" (2007). Masters Theses. 4555. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses/4555 This thesis is brought to you by Scholars' Mine, a service of the Missouri S&T Library and Learning Resources. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEVELOPMENT OF A LIQUID INJECTION PROPANE SYSTEM FOR SPARK- IGNITED ENGINES VIA FUEL TEMPERATURE CONTROL by BRIAN CHARLES APPLEGATE A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-ROLLA In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING 2007 Approved by _______________________________ _______________________________ James A. Drallmeier, Advisor Virgil Flanigan _______________________________ Chris Ramsay © 2007 Brian Charles Applegate All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT This thesis entails the development of a liquid injected propane fuel system. Propane fuel offers opportunities in emissions reductions and lower carbon dioxide production per kilogram of fuel. However, drawbacks to the fuel include current storage in a saturated state. The storage method allows higher fuel volume density storage to minimize storage size. This method of storing the fuel presents fuel metering challenges resultant from the variable density of the two-phase flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Dynamics and Forensic Analysis of Liquid Fuel Fires
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Fire Dynamics and Forensic Analysis of Liquid Fuel Fires Author: Christopher L. Mealy, Matthew E. Benfer, Daniel T. Gottuk Document No.: 238704 Date Received: May 2012 Award Number: 2008-DN-BX-K168 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. FIRE DYNAMICS AND FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF LIQUID FUEL FIRES Final Report Grant No. 2008-DN-BX-K168 Prepared by: Christopher L. Mealy, Matthew E. Benfer, and Daniel T. Gottuk Hughes Associates, Inc. 3610 Commerce Drive, Suite 817 Baltimore, MD 21227 Ph. 410-737-8677 FAX 410-737-8688 February 18, 2011 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]