Connective Tissue Disorders

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Connective Tissue Disorders UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA PHYSICIANS OUTREACH LABS Submit this form along with the appropriate Molecular requisition (Molecular Diagnostics or MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS (612) 273-8445 Molecular NGS Oncology). DATE: TIME COLLECTED: PCU/CLINIC: AM PM PATIENT IDENTIFICATION DIAGNOSIS (Dx) / DIAGNOSIS CODES (ICD-9) - OUTPATIENTS ONLY SPECIMEN TYPE: o Blood (1) (2) (3) (4) PLEASE COLLECT 5-10CC IN ACD-A OR EDTA TUBE ORDERING PHYSICIAN NAME AND PHONE NUMBER: Tests can be ordered as a full panel, or by individual gene(s). Please contact the genetic counselor with any questions at 612-624-8948 or by pager at 612-899-3291. _______________________________________________ Test Ordered- EPIC: Next generation sequencing(Next Gen) Sunquest: NGS FBN1 Connective tissue Asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy Cranioectodermal dysplasia 2 disorders Full panel WDR35 IFT80 Achondrogenesis DYNC2H1 Craniolenticulosutural dysplasia Full panel TTC21B SEC23A SLC26A2 WDR19 Craniosynostosis TRIP11 Atelosteogenesis Full panel COL2A1 Full panel FGFR2 Achondroplasia SLC26A2 IL11RA FGFR3 FLNB CYP26B1 Acrocapitofemoral dysplasia Brachydactyly TWIST1 IHH Full panel MSX2 Acrodysostosis GDF5 FGFR1 Full panel BMP2 FGFR3 PRKAR1A PTHLH PDE4D Brachyolmia Cutis laxa Acrofacial dysostosis Full panel Full panel Full panel PAPSS2 ATP6V0A2 SF3B4 TRPV4 EFEMP2 DHODH Campomelic dysplasia with autosomal PYCR1 Acromesomelic dysplasia sex reversal ALDH18A1 Full panel SOX9 GDF5 Camurati-Engelmann disease De la Chapelle dysplasia NPR2 TGFB1 SLC26A2 Alport syndrome Cenani-Lenz syndactyly syndrome Full panel DesBuquois syndrome COL4A3 LRP4 CANT1 COL4A4 COL4A5 Chondrocalcinosis Diaphanospondylodysostosis Aortopathy ANKH BMPER Full panel MYH11 Chondrodysplasia Diaphyseal medullary stenosis with ACTA2 Full panel malignant fibrous histiocytoma MYLK IMPAD1 MTAP SLC2A10 PTH1R FBN2 BMPR1B Diastrophic dysplasia COL5A2 SLC26A2 COL5A1 Cleidocranial dysplasia Dyssegmental dysplasia, Silverman- COL3A1 RUNX2 Handmaker type CBS HSPG2 TGFBR1 Craniodiaphyseal dysplasia, autosomal TGFBR2 dominant Ectopia lentis et pupillae SMAD3 SOST ADAMTSL4 4/1/2014 Version 1 Metaphyseal anadysplasia Osteopoikilosis Ehlers Danlos syndrome Full panel LEMD3 Full panel MMP13 Paget disease, juvenile FLNA MMP9 TNFRSF11B FKBP14 Metaphyseal chondrodysplasia Polydactyly, preaxial type II CHST14 Full panel LMBR1 B4GALT7 PTH1R Pycnodysostosis B3GALT6 COL10A1 CTSK COL5A2 Metaphyseal dysplasia with maxillary Raine syndrome COL5A1 hypoplasia with or without FAM20C COL1A1 brachydactyly RoBinow syndrome COL3A1 RUNX2 Full panel PLOD1 Mirror-image polydactyly WNT5A COL1A2 MIPOL1 ROR2 ADAMTS2 Multicentric carpotarsal osteolysis SchneckenBecken dysplasia SLC39A13 syndrome SLC35D1 Eiken syndrome MAFB Short riB-polydactyly syndrome PTH1R Multicentric osteolysis, nodulosis, and Full panel FiBrodysplasia ossificans progressiva arthropathy NEK1 Full panel MMP2 DYNC2H1 ACVR1 Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia WDR35 BMP4 Full panel Small patella syndrome Geleophysic dysplasia COMP TBX4 ADAMTSL2 COL9A2 Split hand/foot malformation frontonasal dysplasia COL9A3 Full panel Full panel SLC26A2 SHFM1 ALX3 MATN3 DLX5 ALX4 COL9A1 WNT10B ALX1 Multiple pterygium syndrome TP63 HEM skeletal dysplasia CHRNG Spondylo-megaepiphyseal-metaphyseal LBR Omodysplasia dysplasia Hereditary multiple exostoses GPC6 Full panel Osteogenesis imperfecta NKX3-2 EXT1 Full panel Spondylocarpotarsal synostosis EXT2 COL1A1 syndrome Hypertrophic osteoarthropathy, COL1A2 primary, autosomal recessive 2 PPIB SCT SLCO2A1 IFITM5 Spondylocostal dysostosis Langer mesomelic dysplasia SERPINF1 SHOX CRTAP Full panel Laron dwarfism LEPRE1 DLL3 GHR SERPINH1 MESP2 Leiomyomatosis, diffuse, with Alport FKBP10 LFNG syndrome SP7 HES7 COL4A6 BMP1 Spondyloenchondrodysplasia Leri-Weill dyschondrosteosis Osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis SHOX AMER1 ACP5 Loeys-Dietz syndrome Osteopetrosis Spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia Full panel Full panel TGFBR1 CLCN7 Full panel TGFBR2 TCIRG1 ACAN SMAD3 TNFSF11 KIF22 TGFB2 CA2 MMP13 TGFBR1 OSTM1 TRAPPC2 TGFBR2 PLEKHM1 WISP3 Marfan syndrome TNFRSF11A CHST3 FBN1 SNX10 DDR2 B3GALT6 4/1/2014 Version 1 Stickler syndrome AKR1C2 Kallmann syndrome 1 Full panel 17-alpha-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase KAL1 COL2A1 deficiency Leydig cell hypoplasia with COL11A1 CYP17A1 pseudohermaphroditism COL11A2 Adrenal hyperplasia, congenital, due to LHCGR COL9A1 11-beta-hydroxylase deficiency Lipoid adrenal hyperplasia Stuve-Wiedemann syndrome/Schwartz- CYP11B1 Jampel type 2 syndrome STAR Adrenal insufficiency, congenital, with LIFR Mullerian aplasia and hyperandrogenism 46XY sex reversal, partial or complete synpolydactyly CYP11A1 WNT4 HOXD13 PERSISTENT MULLERIAN DUCT Synpolydactyly, 3/3'4, associated with Alpha-thalassemia/mental retardation SYNDROME metacarpal and metatarsal synostoses syndrome FBLN1 ATRX AMH Thanatophoric dysplasia Androgen insensitivity AMHR2 FGFR3 AR Pseudohermaphroditism, male, with Treacher Collins syndrome gynecomastia Antley-Bixler syndrome with genital Full panel HSD17B3 anomalies and disordered TCOF1 steroidogenesis Short riB-polydactyly syndrome POLR1D POR Full panel POLR1C Aromatase deficiency Ulna and fiBula, aBsence of, with sever NEK1 limB deficiency CYP19A1 DYNC2H1 WNT7A Campomelic dysplasia with autosomal WDR35 Van Buchem disease sex reversal Smith Lemli Opitz syndrome SOST SOX9 DHCR7 Weill-Marchesani syndrome CHARGE syndrome Full panel Sudden infant death with dysgenesis of CHD7 ADAMTS10 the testes syndrome ADAMTS17 Cryptorchidism TSPYL1 Full panel Chrondrodysplasia, acromesomelic, with genital anomalies INSL3 BMPR1B RXFP2 Testicular anomalies with or without Disorders of sex Desmosterolosis congenital heart disease development DHCR24 GATA4 Denys-Drash syndrome 3-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, type II, deficiency WT1 HSD3B2 Disorders of sex development 46,XY ovotesticular DSD EMX2 FGF9 DMRT1 ZFPM2 46,XY sex reversal Fraser syndrome Full panel Full panel AKR1C4 FRAS1 SRY FREM2 RSPO1 GRIP1 SRY Hypospadias 2, X-linked NR0B1 MAMLD1 NR5A1 Pseudovaginal perineoscrotal hypospadias CBX2 SRD5A2 MAP3K1 IMAGE syndrome DHH CDKN1C 4/1/2014 Version 1 Intellectual AFF2 PHF8 disability NLGN4X Autosomal domimant intellectual IQSEC2 disability RPS6KA3 Full panel IL1RAPL1 SCN8A ARX MBD5 PAK3 CACNG2 GDI1 EPB41L1 ZNF81 ARID1B ARHGEF6 ARID1A TSPAN7 SMARCB1 ACSL4 SMARCA4 RAB39B CTNNB1 AGTR2 DOCK8 ZNF41 ZBTB18 FTSJ1 CDH15 DLG3 KIRREL3 ZDHHC15 SYNGAP1 ZNF674 GRIN2B BRWD3 DYRK1A GRIA3 GRIN1 SYP KIF1A ZNF711 Autosomal recessive intellectual disability KIAA2022 Full panel HSD17B10 FGD1 ANK3 PRSS12 SLC9A6 ST3GAL3 UBE2A ZDHHC9 TRAPPC9 TECR HUWE1 MAN1B1 SMS MED23 UPF3B CRBN CLIC2 CC2D1A KDM5C CC2D1A RAB40AL CRADD SOX3 HERC2 PQBP1 TTI2 SHROOM4 NSUN2 AP1S2 TUSC3 CUL4B DIP2B FOXP1 X-linked Intellectual disaBility Full panel PHF6 FMR1 (sequence) 4/1/2014 Version 1 Aural atresia Camptodactyly-arthropathy- Syndromes TSHZ1 coxa vara-pericarditis syndrome 3M syndrome Auriculocondylar syndrome PRG4 Full panel PLCB4 Carpenter syndrome CUL7 Autoimmune disease, RAB23 OBSL1 syndromic multisystem Cerebellar ataxia, mental CCDC8 ITCH retardation, and dysequiliBrium 3MC syndrome Autoinflammation, syndrome 2 Full panel lipodystrophy, and dermatosis WDR81 MASP1 syndrome Cerebral dysgenesis, COLEC11 PSMB8 neuropathy, ichthyosis, and Aarskog-Scott syndrome Bamforth-Lazarus syndrome palmoplantar keratoderma FGD1 FOXE1 syndrome Abruzzo-Erickson syndrome Bardet Biedl syndrome SNAP29 TBX22 Full panel CHARGE syndrome Adams-Oliver BBS1 CHD7 Full panel BBS10 SEMA3E ARHGAP31 TRIM32 CHILD syndrome DOCK6 BBS12 NSDHL ADULT syndrome MKS1 CHIME syndrome TP63 CEP290 PIGL Aicardi-goutieres syndrome WDPCP Choanal atresia and Full panel SDCCAG8 lymphedema TREX1 BBS2 PTPN14 RNASEH2B ARL6 CK syndrome RNASEH2C BBS4 NSDHL RNASEH2A BBS5 Cleft palate and mental SAMHD1 MKKS retardation ADAR BBS7 SATB2 Alagille syndrome TTC8 CluBfoot, congenital, with or Full panel BBS9 without deficiency of long JAG1 Birk-Barel mental retardation bones and/or mirror-image NOTCH2 dysmorphism syndrome polydactyly Alopecia, neurologic defects, KCNK9 PITX1 and endocrinopathy syndrome Blepharophimosis, epicanthus Cocoon syndrome RBM28 inversus, and ptosis, type 2 CHUK Alpha-thalassemia/mental FOXL2 Coffin-Lowry syndrome retardation syndrome Borjeson-Forssman-Lehmann RPS6KA3 ATRX syndrome Cohen syndrome Angelman syndrome PHF6 VPS13B Full panel Bosley-Salih-Alorainy syndrome Congenital cataracts, facial Methylation analysis HOXA1 dysmorphism, and neuropathy SLC9A6 Bowen-Conradi syndrome UBE3A EMG1 CTDP1 Arthrogryposis Brachydactyly-mental Congenital hypothyroidism Full panel retardation syndrome TPM2 HDAC4 PAX8 TNNI2 Brooke-Spiegler syndrome Cornelia de Lange syndrome MYBPC1 CYLD MYH3 Bruck syndrome 2 Full panel MYH8 PLOD2 NIPBL GLE1 Brunner syndrome SMC1A VPS33B MAOA SMC3 VIPAS39 C syndrome (Opitz RAD21 TNNT3 Trignocephaly) HDAC8 AthaBaskan Brainstem CD96 Cousin syndrome dysgenesis syndrome C-like syndrome HOXA1 ASXL1 TBX15 4/1/2014 Version 1 Cranioectodermal dysplasia EVC2 Hemorrhagic destruction of the Full panel EmBerger syndrome brain, subependymal IFT122 GATA2 calcification, and cataracts WDR35 Encephalopahty, lethal, due to JAM3 IFT43 defective mitochondrial Hennekam lymphangiectasia- WDR19 peroxisomal fission lymphedema syndrome Craniofacial anomalies and DNM1L CCBE1 anterior segment dysgenesis Endocrine- Hereditary hemorrhagic syndrome cereBroosteodysplasia telangiectasia VSX1 ICK Full panel Craniofacial dysmorphism, Feingold syndrome SMAD4 skeletal anomalies, and mental MYCN ENG retardation syndrome MIR17HG ACVRL1 TMCO1 Floating-HarBor
Recommended publications
  • Next Generation Sequencing Panels for Disorders of Sex Development
    Next Generation Sequencing Panels for Disorders of Sex Development Disorders of Sex Development – Overview Disorders of sex development (DSDs) occur when sex development does not follow the course of typical male or female patterning. Types of DSDs include congenital development of ambiguous genitalia, disjunction between the internal and external sex anatomy, incomplete development of the sex anatomy, and abnormalities of the development of gonads (such as ovotestes or streak ovaries) (1). Sex chromosome anomalies including Turner syndrome and Klinefelter syndrome as well as sex chromosome mosaicism are also considered to be DSDs. DSDs can be caused by a wide range of genetic abnormalities (2). Determining the etiology of a patient’s DSD can assist in deciding gender assignment, provide recurrence risk information for future pregnancies, and can identify potential health problems such as adrenal crisis or gonadoblastoma (1, 3). Sex chromosome aneuploidy and copy number variation are common genetic causes of DSDs. For this reason, chromosome analysis and/or microarray analysis typically should be the first genetic analysis in the case of a patient with ambiguous genitalia or other suspected disorder of sex development. Identifying whether a patient has a 46,XY or 46,XX karyotype can also be helpful in determining appropriate additional genetic testing. Abnormal/Ambiguous Genitalia Panel Our Abnormal/Ambiguous Genitalia Panel includes mutation analysis of 72 genes associated with both syndromic and non-syndromic DSDs. This comprehensive panel evaluates a broad range of genetic causes of ambiguous or abnormal genitalia, including conditions in which abnormal genitalia are the primary physical finding as well as syndromic conditions that involve abnormal genitalia in addition to other congenital anomalies.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Long-Read Genome Sequencing for the Diagnosis Of
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.02.185447; this version posted September 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Long-read genome sequencing for the diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders Susan M. Hiatt1, James M.J. Lawlor1, Lori H. Handley1, Ryne C. Ramaker1, Brianne B. Rogers1,2, E. Christopher Partridge1, Lori Beth Boston1, Melissa Williams1, Christopher B. Plott1, Jerry Jenkins1, David E. Gray1, James M. Holt1, Kevin M. Bowling1, E. Martina Bebin3, Jane Grimwood1, Jeremy Schmutz1, Gregory M. Cooper1* 1HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA, 35806 2Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA, 35924 3Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA, 35924 *[email protected], 256-327-9490 Conflicts of Interest The authors all declare no conflicts of interest. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.02.185447; this version posted September 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Abstract Purpose Exome and genome sequencing have proven to be effective tools for the diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), but large fractions of NDDs cannot be attributed to currently detectable genetic variation. This is likely, at least in part, a result of the fact that many genetic variants are difficult or impossible to detect through typical short-read sequencing approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of Congenital Ptosis
    13 Review Article Page 1 of 13 Treatment of congenital ptosis Vladimir Kratky1,2^ 1Department of Ophthalmology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada; 21st Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic Correspondence to: Vladimir Kratky, BSc, MD, FRCSC, DABO. Associate Professor of Ophthalmology, Director of Ophthalmic Plastic and Orbital Surgery, Oculoplastics Fellowship Director, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada; 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. Email: [email protected]. Abstract: Congenital ptosis is an abnormally low position of the upper eyelid, with respect to the visual axis in the primary gaze. It can be present at birth or manifest itself during the first year of life and can be bilateral or unilateral. Additionally, it may be an isolated finding or part of a constellation of signs of a specific syndrome or systemic associations. Depending on how much it interferes with the visual axis, it may be considered as a functional or a cosmetic condition. In childhood, functional ptosis can lead to deprivation amblyopia and astigmatism and needs to be treated. However, even mild ptosis with normal vision can lead to psychosocial problems and correction is also advised, albeit on a less urgent basis. Although, patching and glasses can be prescribed to treat the amblyopia, the mainstay of management is surgical. There are several types of surgical procedure available depending on the severity and etiology of the droopy eyelid. The first part of this paper will review the different categories of congenital ptosis, including more common associated syndromes. The latter part will briefly cover the different surgical approaches, with emphasis on how to choose the correct condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Medical Genetics April 1992 Vol 29 No4 Contents Original Articles
    Journal of Medical Genetics April 1992 Vol 29 No4 Contents Original articles Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: a demonstration of the mechanisms responsible for the excess J Med Genet: first published as on 1 April 1992. Downloaded from of transmitting females C Moutou, C Junien, / Henry, C Bonai-Pellig 217 Evidence for paternal imprinting in familial Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome D Viljoen, R Ramesar 221 Sex reversal in a child with a 46,X,Yp+ karyotype: support for the existence of a gene(s), located in distal Xp, involved in testis formation T Ogata, J R Hawkins, A Taylor, N Matsuo, J-1 Hata, P N Goodfellow 226 Highly polymorphic Xbol RFLPs of the human 21 -hydroxylase genes among Chinese L Chen, X Pan, Y Shen, Z Chen, Y Zhang, R Chen 231 Screening of microdeletions of chromosome 20 in patients with Alagille syndrome C Desmaze, J F Deleuze, A M Dutrillaux, G Thomas, M Hadchouel, A Aurias 233 Confirmation of genetic linkage between atopic IgE responses and chromosome 1 1 ql 3 R P Young, P A Sharp, J R Lynch, J A Faux, G M Lathrop, W 0 C M Cookson, J M Hopkini 236 Age at onset and life table risks in genetic counselling for Huntington's disease P S Harper, R G Newcombe 239 Genetic and clinical studies in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease type 1 (ADPKD1) E Coto, S Aguado, J Alvarez, M J Menendez-DIas, C Lopez-Larrea 243 Short communication Evidence for linkage disequilibrium between D16S94 and the adult onset polycystic kidney disease (PKD1) gene S E Pound, A D Carothers, P M Pignatelli, A M Macnicol, M L Watson, A F Wright 247 Technical note A strategy for the rapid isolation of new PCR based DNA polymorphisms P R Hoban, M F Santibanez-Koref, J Heighway 249 http://jmg.bmj.com/ Case reports Campomelic dysplasia associated with a de novo 2q;1 7q reciprocal translocation I D Young, J M Zuccollo, E L Maltby, N J Broderick 251 A complex chromosome rearrangement with 10 breakpoints: tentative assignment of the locus for Williams syndrome to 4q33-q35.1 R Tupler, P Maraschio, A Gerardo, R Mainieri G Lanzi L Tiepolo 253 on September 26, 2021 by guest.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiences of Rare Diseases: an Insight from Patients and Families
    Experiences of Rare Diseases: An Insight from Patients and Families Unit 4D, Leroy House 436 Essex Road London N1 3QP tel: 02077043141 fax: 02073591447 [email protected] www.raredisease.org.uk By Lauren Limb, Stephen Nutt and Alev Sen - December 2010 Web and press design www.raredisease.org.uk WordsAndPeople.com About Rare Disease UK Rare Disease UK (RDUK) is the national alliance for people with rare diseases and all who support them. Our membership is open to all and includes patient organisations, clinicians, researchers, academics, industry and individuals with an interest in rare diseases. RDUK was established by Genetic RDUK is campaigning for a Alliance UK, the national charity strategy for integrated service of over 130 patient organisations delivery for rare diseases. This supporting all those affected by would coordinate: genetic conditions, in conjunction with other key stakeholders | Research in November 2008 following the European Commission’s | Prevention and diagnosis Communication on Rare Diseases: | Treatment and care Europe’s Challenges. | Information Subsequently RDUK successfully | Commissioning and planning campaigned for the adoption of the Council of the European into one cohesive strategy for all Union’s Recommendation on patients affected by rare disease in an action in the field of rare the UK. As well as securing better diseases. The Recommendation outcomes for patients, a strategy was adopted unanimously by each would enable the most effective Member State of the EU (including use of NHS resources. the
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic Basis for Skeletal Diseases
    insight review articles The genetic basis for skeletal diseases Elazar Zelzer & Bjorn R. Olsen Harvard Medical School, Department of Cell Biology, 240 Longwood Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA (e-mail: [email protected]) We walk, run, work and play, paying little attention to our bones, their joints and their muscle connections, because the system works. Evolution has refined robust genetic mechanisms for skeletal development and growth that are able to direct the formation of a complex, yet wonderfully adaptable organ system. How is it done? Recent studies of rare genetic diseases have identified many of the critical transcription factors and signalling pathways specifying the normal development of bones, confirming the wisdom of William Harvey when he said: “nature is nowhere accustomed more openly to display her secret mysteries than in cases where she shows traces of her workings apart from the beaten path”. enetic studies of diseases that affect skeletal differentiation to cartilage cells (chondrocytes) or bone cells development and growth are providing (osteoblasts) within the condensations. Subsequent growth invaluable insights into the roles not only of during the organogenesis phase generates cartilage models individual genes, but also of entire (anlagen) of future bones (as in limb bones) or membranous developmental pathways. Different mutations bones (as in the cranial vault) (Fig. 1). The cartilage anlagen Gin the same gene may result in a range of abnormalities, are replaced by bone and marrow in a process called endo- and disease ‘families’ are frequently caused by mutations in chondral ossification. Finally, a process of growth and components of the same pathway.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inactive X Chromosome Is Epigenetically Unstable and Transcriptionally Labile in Breast Cancer
    Supplemental Information The inactive X chromosome is epigenetically unstable and transcriptionally labile in breast cancer Ronan Chaligné1,2,3,8, Tatiana Popova1,4, Marco-Antonio Mendoza-Parra5, Mohamed-Ashick M. Saleem5 , David Gentien1,6, Kristen Ban1,2,3,8, Tristan Piolot1,7, Olivier Leroy1,7, Odette Mariani6, Hinrich Gronemeyer*5, Anne Vincent-Salomon*1,4,6,8, Marc-Henri Stern*1,4,6 and Edith Heard*1,2,3,8 Extended Experimental Procedures Cell Culture Human Mammary Epithelial Cells (HMEC, Invitrogen) were grown in serum-free medium (HuMEC, Invitrogen). WI- 38, ZR-75-1, SK-BR-3 and MDA-MB-436 cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Invitrogen) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). DNA Methylation analysis. We bisulfite-treated 2 µg of genomic DNA using Epitect bisulfite kit (Qiagen). Bisulfite converted DNA was amplified with bisulfite primers listed in Table S3. All primers incorporated a T7 promoter tag, and PCR conditions are available upon request. We analyzed PCR products by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry after in vitro transcription and specific cleavage (EpiTYPER by Sequenom®). For each amplicon, we analyzed two independent DNA samples and several CG sites in the CpG Island. Design of primers and selection of best promoter region to assess (approx. 500 bp) were done by a combination of UCSC Genome Browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu) and MethPrimer (http://www.urogene.org). All the primers used are listed (Table S3). NB: MAGEC2 CpG analysis have been done with a combination of two CpG island identified in the gene core. Analysis of RNA allelic expression profiles (based on Human SNP Array 6.0) DNA and RNA hybridizations were normalized by Genotyping console.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Loss of CASK Causes Severe Ataxia Through Cerebellar Degeneration
    Complete loss of CASK causes severe ataxia through cerebellar degeneration Paras Patel Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC Julia Hegert Orlando Health Corp Ingrid Cristian Orlando Health Corp Alicia Kerr National Eye Institute Leslie LaConte Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC Michael Fox Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC Sarika Srivastava Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC Konark Mukherjee ( [email protected] ) Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6922-9554 Research article Keywords: CASK, MICPCH, neurodegeneration, X-linked, X-inactivation, cerebellum, ataxia Posted Date: May 4th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-456061/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/34 Abstract Background: Heterozygous loss of X-linked genes like CASK and MeCP2 (Rett syndrome) causes neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) in girls, while in boys loss of the only allele of these genes leads to profound encephalopathy. The cellular basis for these disorders remains unknown. CASK is presumed to work through the Tbr1-reelin pathway in neuronal migration. Methods: Here we report clinical and histopathological analysis of a deceased 2-month-old boy with a CASK-null mutation. We rst analyze in vivo data from the subject including genetic characterization, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ndings, and spectral characteristics of the electroencephalogram (EEG). We next compare features of the cerebellum to an-age matched control. Based on this, we generate a murine model where CASK is completely deleted from post-migratory neurons in the cerebellum. Results: Although smaller, the CASK-null human brain exhibits normal lamination without defective neuronal differentiation, migration, or axonal guidance, excluding the role of reelin.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Anterior Segment Phenotypes Resulting from Forkhead Gene Alterations: Evidence for Cross-Species Conservation of Function
    Novel Anterior Segment Phenotypes Resulting from Forkhead Gene Alterations: Evidence for Cross-Species Conservation of Function Ordan J. Lehmann,1 Stephen Tuft,2 Glen Brice,3 Richard Smith,4 Åsa Blixt,5 Rachel Bell,3 Bengt Johansson,6 Tim Jordan,1 Roger A. Hitchings,2 Peng T. Khaw,2 Simon W. M. John,4 Peter Carlsson,5 and Shomi S. Bhattacharya1 PURPOSE. Mutations in murine and human versions of an ances- cause it may affect the clinical management of certain trally related gene usually result in similar phenotypes. How- glaucoma subtypes and lead to excessive treatment. The ever, interspecies differences exist, and in the case of two FOXC1 and Foxe3 data, taken together with the novel ocular forkhead transcription factor genes (FOXC1 and FOXC2), phenotypes of FOXC2 mutations, highlight the remarkable these differences include corneal or anterior segment pheno- cross-species conservation of function among forkhead genes. types, respectively. This study was undertaken to determine (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2627–2633) DOI:10.1167/ whether such discrepancies provide an opportunity for iden- iovs.02-0609 tifying novel human–murine ocular phenotypes. METHODS. Four pedigrees with early-onset glaucoma pheno- types secondary to segmental chromosomal duplications or ecognition that mutations in orthologous genes frequently deletions encompassing FOXC1 and 18 individuals from 9 Rcause similar phenotypes has allowed the field of compar- FOXC2 mutation pedigrees underwent detailed ocular pheno- ative genetics to contribute to the understanding of human typing. Subsequently, mice with mutations in Foxc1 or a re- disease. As the human, murine, and Drosophila PAX6 mutants lated forkhead gene, Foxe3, were assessed for features of the (aniridia, Small eye, and eyeless) demonstrate, genotypic con- human phenotypes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Etiologies by Frequencies
    2018 Etiologies in Order of Frequency by Category Hereditary Syndromes and Disorders Count CHARGE Syndrome 958 Down syndrome (Trisomy 21 syndrome) 308 Usher I syndrome 252 Stickler syndrome 130 Dandy Walker syndrome 119 Cornelia de Lange 102 Goldenhar syndrome 98 Usher II syndrome 83 Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (Trisomy 4p) 68 Trisomy 13 (Trisomy 13-15, Patau syndrome) 60 Pierre-Robin syndrome 57 Moebius syndrome 55 Trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrome) 52 Norrie disease 38 Leber congenital amaurosis 35 Chromosome 18, Ring 18 31 Aicardi syndrome 29 Alstrom syndrome 27 Pfieffer syndrome 27 Treacher Collins syndrome 27 Waardenburg syndrome 27 Marshall syndrome 25 Refsum syndrome 21 Cri du chat syndrome (Chromosome 5p- synd) 16 Bardet-Biedl syndrome (Laurence Moon-Biedl) 15 Hurler syndrome (MPS I-H) 15 Crouzon syndrome (Craniofacial Dysotosis) 13 NF1 - Neurofibromatosis (von Recklinghausen dis) 13 Kniest Dysplasia 12 Turner syndrome 11 Usher III syndrome 10 Cockayne syndrome 9 Apert syndrome/Acrocephalosyndactyly, Type 1 8 Leigh Disease 8 Alport syndrome 6 Monosomy 10p 6 NF2 - Bilateral Acoustic Neurofibromatosis 6 Batten disease 5 Kearns-Sayre syndrome 5 Klippel-Feil sequence 5 Hereditary Syndromes and Disorders Count Prader-Willi 5 Sturge-Weber syndrome 5 Marfan syndrome 3 Hand-Schuller-Christian (Histiocytosis X) 2 Hunter Syndrome (MPS II) 2 Maroteaux-Lamy syndrome (MPS VI) 2 Morquio syndrome (MPS IV-B) 2 Optico-Cochleo-Dentate Degeneration 2 Smith-Lemli-Opitz (SLO) syndrome 2 Wildervanck syndrome 2 Herpes-Zoster (or Hunt) 1 Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada
    [Show full text]
  • My Beloved Neutrophil Dr Boxer 2014 Neutropenia Family Conference
    The Beloved Neutrophil: Its Function in Health and Disease Stem Cell Multipotent Progenitor Myeloid Lymphoid CMP IL-3, SCF, GM-CSF CLP Committed Progenitor MEP GMP GM-CSF, IL-3, SCF EPO TPO G-CSF M-CSF IL-5 IL-3 SCF RBC Platelet Neutrophil Monocyte/ Basophil B-cells Macrophage Eosinophil T-Cells Mast cell NK cells Mature Cell Dendritic cells PRODUCTION AND KINETICS OF NEUTROPHILS CELLS % CELLS TIME Bone Marrow: Myeloblast 1 7 - 9 Mitotic Promyelocyte 4 Days Myelocyte 16 Maturation/ Metamyelocyte 22 3 – 7 Storage Band 30 Days Seg 21 Vascular: Peripheral Blood Seg 2 6 – 12 hours 3 Marginating Pool Apoptosis and ? Tissue clearance by 0 – 3 macrophages days PHAGOCYTOSIS 1. Mobilization 2. Chemotaxis 3. Recognition (Opsonization) 4. Ingestion 5. Degranulation 6. Peroxidation 7. Killing and Digestion 8. Net formation Adhesion: β 2 Integrins ▪ Heterodimer of a and b chain ▪ Tight adhesion, migration, ingestion, co- stimulation of other PMN responses LFA-1 Mac-1 (CR3) p150,95 a2b2 a CD11a CD11b CD11c CD11d b CD18 CD18 CD18 CD18 Cells All PMN, Dendritic Mac, mono, leukocytes mono/mac, PMN, T cell LGL Ligands ICAMs ICAM-1 C3bi, ICAM-3, C3bi other other Fibrinogen other GRANULOCYTE CHEMOATTRACTANTS Chemoattractants Source Activators Lipids PAF Neutrophils C5a, LPS, FMLP Endothelium LTB4 Neutrophils FMLP, C5a, LPS Chemokines (a) IL-8 Monocytes, endothelium LPS, IL-1, TNF, IL-3 other cells Gro a, b, g Monocytes, endothelium IL-1, TNF other cells NAP-2 Activated platelets Platelet activation Others FMLP Bacteria C5a Activation of complement Other Important Receptors on PMNs ñ Pattern recognition receptors – Detect microbes - Toll receptor family - Mannose receptor - bGlucan receptor – fungal cell walls ñ Cytokine receptors – enhance PMN function - G-CSF, GM-CSF - TNF Receptor ñ Opsonin receptors – trigger phagocytosis - FcgRI, II, III - Complement receptors – ñ Mac1/CR3 (CD11b/CD18) – C3bi ñ CR-1 – C3b, C4b, C3bi, C1q, Mannose binding protein From JG Hirsch, J Exp Med 116:827, 1962, with permission.
    [Show full text]