Arxiv:2008.10500V2 [Math.NT] 4 Apr 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Partitions into Beatty sequences Nian Hong Zhou April 6, 2021 Abstract Let α > 1 be an irrational number. We establish asymptotic formulas for the number of partitions of n into summands and distinct summands, chosen from the Beatty sequence ( αm )m∈N. This improves some results of Erd¨os and Richmond established in 1977.⌊ ⌋ 1 Introduction and statement of results A partition of an integer n is a sequence of non-increasing positive integers whose sum equals n. The study of the asymptotic behavior of various types of integer partition has a long history, see Hardy and Ramanujan [HR18], Ingham [Ing41], Roth and Szekeres [RS54], Meinardus [Mei54] and Richmond [Ric75] for example. One of the most celebrated results is the asymptotic formula for p(n), the number of unrestricted partitions of n. Hardy and Ramanujan [HR18] proved 1 p(n) eπ√2n/3, (1.1) ∼ 4√3n as integer n + . In the same paper, they also established an asymptotic formula → ∞ for the number q(n) of partitions of n with unequal parts. As n →∞ 1 q(n) eπ√n/3. ∼ 4 31/4 n3/4 · · arXiv:2008.10500v2 [math.NT] 4 Apr 2021 Let α > 1 be an irrational number and x denotes the largest integer x. ⌊ ⌋ ≤ As a natural extension which has not previously appeared in the literature, Erd¨os and Richmond [ER78] investigate the asymptotic behavior of pα(n), and qα(n), the number of partitions of n into summands, and distinct summands, respectively, chosen from the Beatty sequence ( αm )m N. They gave asymptotic formulas with an error ⌊ ⌋ ∈ term of pα(n) and qα(n) for almost all α (in the Lebesgue sense). To introduce the main results of Erd¨os and Richmond [ER78] conveniently, we introduce the definition of irrationality measure. Let x := minn Z x n and α R. k k ∈ | − | ∈ Recall that µ R is an irrationality exponent of α, if ∈ 1 µ 0 <q− qα <q− , k k 1 Partitions into Beatty sequences has (at most) finitely many solutions q N. We denote by µ(α) the infimum of such ∈ irrationality exponents µ and call it the irrationality measure of α. If µ(α)= then ∞ we call α a Liouville number. We note that the irrationality measure of an irrational number is always 2. ≥ One of the critical issues in [ER78] is the convergence of the following Dirichlet series B (αℓ) J (s) := 1 , (1.2) α ℓs ℓ 1 X≥ e where B (x)= x 1/2, and x := x x is the fractional part of x. Hardy and 1 { }− { } − ⌊ ⌋ Littlewood [HL22, p. 248, (a)] proved that if µ(α) [2, ) then J (s) is convergent ∈ ∞ α for s >e 1 1/(µ(α) 1) 1. Thanks to this result, Erd¨os and Richmond [ER78] − − established asymptotic formulas with error term of pα(n) and qα(n) when irrational number α > 1 has a finite irrationality measure µ(α), see [ER78, Theorem 2]2’ 3. However, for α> 1 being a Liouville number, that is µ(α)= , they only can prove ∞ n log q (n)= π + O(nε) α 3α r and 2n ε log pα(n)= π + O(n ), r3α for any ε> 0. In this paper, we are interesting the asymptotic formulas of pα(n) and qα(n), when α> 1 being a Liouville number. The main result of this paper is the following Theorem 1.1. Theorem 1.1. Let α> 1 be an irrational number. As n →∞ n exp π 3α qα(n) 2 1/2α 1/4 3/4 , ∼ 2 − (3αp) n 1The condition stated in [HL22, pp. 213, Equation (1.331)] is nh| sin(αnπ)|≥ A> 0 for all n ∈ N. This is equivalent to our definition for irrationality exponent when letting µ =1+ h. 2The condition stated in [ER78] is there exist λ ∈ R such that |ℓ1+λ+ε sin(αℓπ)|→∞, holds for any ε> 0, as integer ℓ →∞. This is equivalent to our definition for irrationality exponent when letting µ =2+ λ. 3Note that there exist serval typos in the statement of [ER78, Theorem 2] as well as its proof. For the corrected leading asymptotic formulas of pα(n) and qα(n) with µ(α) < ∞, see Theorem 1.1 of this paper. 2 Nian Hong Zhou and exp 2π n p (n)= 6α . (1.3) α 1 1/4α+o(1) n − p Furthermore, if the series (1.2) of Jα(1) is convergent, then n exp 2π 6α pα(n) 1 1/4α , (1.4) ∼ Λαn −p wherewith γ denote the Euler-Mascheroni constant, 1/4α γ 1 α αℓ 1 Λ = 4√3(πe− ) 2α 1 { } e 2αℓ . (1.5) α 6 − αℓ ℓ 1 Y≥ Remark 1.1. Theorem 1.1 is new for α > 1 being a Liouville number. Surprisingly, for all irrational numbers α > 1, we can find an asymptotic formula of type (1.1) for qα(n). However, for pα(n) if there is no additional assumption, such as the convergence of the series (1.2) of Jα(1), we can only get (1.3) at present. By using a result of Ostrowski [Ost22] on Diophantine approximation, we give an effective condition for the validity of the asymptotic formula (1.4). Corollary 1.2. If there exists a function ψ : R R of which is decreasing for all + → + sufficiently large x such that ψ(x) dx ∞ < + , x ∞ Z1 as well as for all integer q 1, ≥ 1 qψ(q) q− qα > e− . k k Then the series (1.2) of Jα(1) is convergent. Further, (1.4) in Theorem 1.1 holds. Remark 1.2. It might be an interesting problem that whether the series (1.2) of Jα(1) is convergent for all irrational numbers α. 1 δ Remark 1.3. Taking ψ(x) = x(log x + 1)− − , (δ > 0), then ψ(x) satisfies the condi- tions of Corollary 1.2. If α R Q has a finite irrationality measure, that is there ∈ \ exist a λ 2 such that ≥ 1 λ q− qα q− , k k≫ for all integer q 1. Then, since q λ e ψ(q), we have α> 1 satisfies the conditions ≥ − ≫ − of Corollary 1.2. Therefore, we can see from Wolfram Web Resources [Wei20] that α can take 1 + log 2, log 3, e, π, π2, ζ(3), all irrational algebraic numbers greater than 1 and so on. 3 Partitions into Beatty sequences We shall give some numerical data to support Theorem 1.1 and Corollary 1.2. Let us consider the cases of α = √2. One can prove in Appendix A that Λ (5.7331, 5.7339). √2 ∈ Denoting by π n 3/4 q 3√2 qˆ√2(n)= n− e and π 2n 1+1/4√2 q 3√2 pˆ√2(n)= n− e . Then, with the help of Mathematica, the use of Theorem 1.1 gives qˆ (n) (4.493 )q (n), andp ˆ (n) (5.773 )p (n). (1.6) √2 ∼ · · · √2 √2 ∼ · · · √2 We illustrate some of our results in the following(All computations are done in Math- ematica). Table 1: Numerical data for q√2(n). n q√2(n) qˆ√2(n) qˆ√2(n)/q√2(n) 50 552 2568.04 4.65225 ∼ 100 28870 133026.0 4.60774 ∼ 200 9582142 4.38416 107 4.57534 · ∼ 400 43472367216 1.97845 1011 4.55105 · ∼ 800 7972258288121676 3.61410 1016 4.53334 · ∼ 1600 273790497114888860128182 1.23780 1024 4.52097 · ∼ Table 2: Numerical data for p√2(n). n p√2(n) pˆ√2(n) pˆ√2(n)/p√2(n) 25 560 3412.03 6.09291 ∼ 50 28086 167998.0 5.98154 ∼ 100 8892735 5.26274 107 5.91802 · ∼ 200 38427241214 2.25740 1011 5.87448 · ∼ 400 6706078262183805 3.91959 1016 5.84483 · ∼ 800 219091729965354807601257 1.27599 1024 5.82401 · ∼ Comparing the above two tables with (1.6), we see that the numerical data supports our main result Theorem 1.1 and Corollary 1.2. 2 The proof of the main results In the section, we prove Theorem 1.1 and Corollary 1.2. Let α > 1 be an irrational number and t> 0. Denoting by t αℓ L (t)= log 1 e− ⌊ ⌋ . α − − ℓ 1 X≥ 4 Nian Hong Zhou The following Proposition 2.1 follows from Erd¨os and Richmond [ER78, Theorem 1]. Proposition 2.1. As n + → ∞ exp (Lα(x) Lα(2x)+ nx) qα(n) − , ∼ 2π(L (x) 4L (2x)) α′′ − α′′ where x R solves the equation: pL (x) 2L (2x)+ n = 0. ∈ + α′ − α′ Furthermore, as n + → ∞ exp (Lα(y)+ ny) pα(n) , ∼ 2πLα′′ (y) where y R solves the equation: L (y)+p n = 0. ∈ + α′ We see from Erd¨os and Richmond [ER78] that Proposition 2.1 follows from the work of Roth and Szekeres [RS54], as well as the equidistribution properties of the sequence ( αm )m N. Under above Proposition 2.1, Theorem 1.1 will follows from ⌊ ⌋ ∈ the following proposition. Proposition 2.2. Let t 0+. For any irrational α> 1 we have → π2 1 α 1 L (t)= + − − log t + o( log t ), α 6αt 2 | | π2 1 α 1 L (t) L (2t)= − − log 2 + o(1), α − α 12αt − 2 2 1 π 1 α− 1 L′ (t)= + − + o , α −6αt2 2t t and π2 1 L′′ (t)= + O . α 3αt3 t2 Furthermore, if the series (1.2) of Jα(1) is convergent then π2 1 α 1 L (t)= + − − log t + c + o(1), α 6αt 2 α where γ 1 1 α 1 1 αℓ c = log (2π)+ − − log α + + log 1 { } .